policy analysis models

85
An Abbreviated History of American Health Politics Dr. J. Hughes Bioethics and Public Policy Trinity College – Summer 2010

Upload: morrie

Post on 21-Jan-2016

50 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

An Abbreviated History of American Health Politics Dr. J. Hughes Bioethics and Public Policy Trinity College – Summer 2010. Policy Analysis Models. Who gets what and why Inputs: influences on government Process: the legislative bargaining and maneuvering - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Policy Analysis Models

An Abbreviated History of American Health Politics

Dr. J. HughesBioethics and Public Policy

Trinity College – Summer 2010

Page 2: Policy Analysis Models

Policy Analysis Models

Who gets what and why

Inputs: influences on government

Process: the legislative bargaining and maneuvering

Outputs: decisions, actions and implementation

Page 3: Policy Analysis Models

Type of Explanations

Government as rational actorPopular rule through

elections/rep elitesPolitical bargaining/

Interest groupsAmerican political cultureLegislative processElite ruleMarxist FunctionalismClass Struggle Marxism

Page 4: Policy Analysis Models

Dimensions of Power

Coercive: A and B fight, B loses

Remunerative: A buys B’s consent

Normative: A convinces B that A’s way is the only way

Nondebates: A keeps B from ever thinking about what she wants

Page 5: Policy Analysis Models

"Democratic Culture"

The Jacksonian compromise between capitalism and democracy

Domestic Medicine The Medical Counterculture

– Thomsonians, homeopaths– What is homeopathy (3min)

Professional Medicine – AMA founded 1847

Page 6: Policy Analysis Models

Germ Theory of Disease

1867 - Joseph Lister publishes On the Antiseptic Principle in the Practice of Surgery, showing that disinfection reduces post-operative infections.

1879 - Pasteur demonstrates anthrax vaccine

1882 – Koch demonstrates TB & cholera micro-organisms

1885 – Pasteur develops rabies vaccine 1916 - Polio epidemics break out,

continue for decades 1918-1919 - Flu pandemic kills 15

million people worldwide, 600,000 in U.S.

Page 7: Policy Analysis Models

Allopathic medicine triumphs

1910 – Flexner ReportHospitals become

centers for healingAMA becomes

powerful guild

Abraham Flexner

Page 8: Policy Analysis Models

Alternative: Social medicine

Role of poverty, housing and education

Growth of social insurance in Europe

John Snow and the removal of the Broad Street pump handle (8 min video)

John Snow

Page 9: Policy Analysis Models

Progressives and the AALL

Theodore Roosevelt 1901 -- 1909 AALL Bill 1915 AMA supported AALL Proposal AFL opposed AALL Proposal Private insurance industry

opposed AALL Proposal WWI and anti-German fever Why did the Progressives fail?

Page 10: Policy Analysis Models

1930s – Health Care in Crisis

Blue Cross and Blue Shield get started

FDR's first attempt at NHI -- failure to include in the Social Security Bill of 1935

Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act– FDA given control over drug safety

– Establishes class of drugs available by Prescription

FDR's second attempt at NHI -- Wagner Bill, Nat. Health Act of 1939

Page 11: Policy Analysis Models

1940s – Building Modernity

War, trauma and penicillin1946 – Hill/Burton Act1946 - British Nat. Health

ServiceWagner-Murray-Dingell Bills 1948 - Truman's SupportGrowth of private insurers

Page 12: Policy Analysis Models

1965 – Medicare/Medicaid

Medicare A: Hospital costs, paid for with payroll tax

Medicare B: Supp insurance for docs & outpatient

Medicaid: federal-state program for the poor, all hospital, doc, lab, home health and nursing home care

Expected goal – universal health coverage in 20 years No fee schedules for docs or hospitals Expected 1990 cost: $10 billion Actual 1990 cost: $180 billion 1969 – Canadians enact Nat. Health Insurance

Page 13: Policy Analysis Models

1970s – Costs spur innovation

Costs begin to riseGrowth of bureaucracyGrowth of medical specialists1973 – Nixon passes HMO Act;

provided subsidies and exempted from regs

1972-1979 Ted Kennedy’s campaign for NHI

Page 14: Policy Analysis Models

1980s – Managed Care

DRGs Growth of Managed care Growing interest among

employers in controlling costs

Capitation of physician payment

Growth in size of physician groups

Growth of for-profit institutions Selective contracting Price competition Mergers and acquisitions: Hospital Corporation of America Vertical and horizontal integration HMOs for Medicaid and Medicare

Page 15: Policy Analysis Models

Managed Care Types

Page 16: Policy Analysis Models

Type of Health Plan

HMOs v. PPOs (1min)HMO vs POS vs PPO (4min)

Page 17: Policy Analysis Models

1990-1994 – Clinton Effort

Harris Wofford elected on “single-payer” platform

1994 Clinton Health Plan– Committee of 500– Managed competition

Page 18: Policy Analysis Models

Clinton’s Plan

ConsumerChoice

ConsumersVouchers Health Alliances

Producing report cards on- benefits and access- pt satisfaction/ disenrollment- clinical outcomes- cost

ReportCards

Plan A Plan B Plan C Plan D

Page 19: Policy Analysis Models

1994-2008

1996: HIPAA – patient info privacy1997: CHIPS – subsidized children’s

insurance1997 Part C: Medicare Advantage plansStates: Patient Bill of Rights2006: Part D: Prescription Drug plans

Page 20: Policy Analysis Models

Reform Support Was High

Page 21: Policy Analysis Models

Majorities Favored Elements

Page 22: Policy Analysis Models

2009 – Obama’s Reform

Frontline history 60min Compromises:

– Pharmaceutical prices

– Public option

Individual MandateExpansion of Medicaid and

subsidiesHealth Insurance ExchangesNo pre-existing condition &

high-risk pool

Page 23: Policy Analysis Models

But, we are still the most expensive

Total health spending 17% of GDP in the United States in 2009, highest in OECD

Canada and France about 10%OECD avereage 8.6%$2,000,000,000,000 a year$1 trillion increase in health care

spending over the last decade

Page 24: Policy Analysis Models

As a Percent of Family Income

Page 25: Policy Analysis Models

Health Care Costs per Capita

  1970 1980 1990 2003

United States $352 $1,072 $2,752 $5,711

Switzerland $351 $1,031 $2,029 $3,847

Norway $141 $665 $1,393 $3,769

Iceland $163 $703 $1,593 $3,159

France $205 $697 $1,532 $3,048

Belgium $148 $636 $1,341 $3,044

Canada $299 $783 $1,737 $2,998

Austria $193 $770 $1,328 $2,958

Netherlands NA $755 $1,435 $2,909

Australia $252 $691 $1,306 $2,886

Sweden $312 $944 $1,589 $2,745

Denmark $384 $927 $1,522 $2,743

Ireland $117 $519 $794 $2,455

United Kingdom $163 $480 $987 $2,317

Italy NA NA $1,387 $2,314

Japan $149 $580 $1,116 $2,249

Finland $191 $590 $1,419 $2,104

Page 26: Policy Analysis Models

Cost per Year per Capita

Page 27: Policy Analysis Models

Cost Trends 1980-2004

Page 28: Policy Analysis Models

Public/Private Expenditures

More than 75% of health spending is through public insurance in other countries, just half in US

Page 29: Policy Analysis Models

Putting Off Care Because of Cost

Page 30: Policy Analysis Models

Consequences

Page 31: Policy Analysis Models

Causes of Health Care Inflation

TechnologyAging of population, longer lifespanLack of effective competition or global

budgeting

Page 32: Policy Analysis Models

Administrative Overhead

Page 33: Policy Analysis Models

Admin Staff per Patient

Page 34: Policy Analysis Models

Life Expectancy

Page 35: Policy Analysis Models

Spending & Life Expectancy

Page 36: Policy Analysis Models

Infant Mortality

Page 37: Policy Analysis Models

Obesity

Page 38: Policy Analysis Models

Mental Illness

OECD 2009 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/538536332624

Page 39: Policy Analysis Models

Uninsured in the US

The problem of the uninsured is continuing to grow. The federal government estimates that over 45 million individuals lacked health insurance coverage of any kind during 2008.

Source: SHADAC estimates from the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplements, 1995-2008. Note: 1995-2003 data are adjusted for Census correction announced in March 2007.

Page 40: Policy Analysis Models

Future Trends

Financial Viability of Medicare and Medicaid

Pressures for universal coverage and cost containment

Emerging technologies could:– dramatically reduce or expand costs, – eliminate, create or transform professions, – enable consumer choice and quality

measurement

Page 41: Policy Analysis Models

IDEOLOGIES AND MARKETS

Page 42: Policy Analysis Models

Democracy

Liberty/AutonomySolidarity/BeneficenceEquality/Justice

Page 43: Policy Analysis Models

Autonomy/Liberty

Negative freedom from coercionPositive: freedom to Exit and Voice Patient autonomy and informed

consent Right to refuse 

 

Page 44: Policy Analysis Models

Beneficence/Solidarity

Positive rights to demand entitlements of citizenship

Should access to basic health care be a right?

Which services should health care providers be obligated to provide regardless of risks or their moral or economic reservations?

Page 45: Policy Analysis Models

Justice/Equality

Equal opportunitiesEquality before the lawThe right to control institutions

through equal sufferage

Page 46: Policy Analysis Models

Market vs. State

Exit vs. VoiceEfficiency vs. EqualityFlexibility vs. AccountabilityResponsibility vs. SolidarityFreedom from vs. Freedom to

Page 47: Policy Analysis Models

Rights

Dems, liberals, women, the young, seculars support healthcare rights

Page 48: Policy Analysis Models

Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions

Page 49: Policy Analysis Models

Emanuel et al’s Proposal

Page 50: Policy Analysis Models

GOVERNMENT IN HEALTH CARE

Page 51: Policy Analysis Models

TransNational Agencies

UN: World Health OrganizationForeign AidInternational Family PlanningRefugee Assistance and Famine ReliefWTO and Transnat. Treaties on

Environmental Protection

Page 52: Policy Analysis Models

Executive Branch

Health and Human Services The Secretary of Health and Human Services (OS) Administration for Children and Families (ACF) Administration on Aging (AOA) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Indian Health Service (IHS) Program Support Center (PSC) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Page 53: Policy Analysis Models

National Institutes of Health

Office of the Director (OD) Nat. Cancer Institute (NCI) Nat. Eye Institute (NEI) Nat. Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Nat. Human Genome Research Institute

(NHGRI) Nat. Institute on Aging (NIA) Nat. Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism

(NIAAA) Nat. Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

(NIAID) Nat. Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal

and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) Nat. Institute of Child Health and Human

Development (NICHD) Nat. Institute on Deafness and Other

Communication Disorders (NIDCD) Nat. Institute of Dental and Craniofacial

Research (NIDCR) Nat. Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and

Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Nat. Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Nat. Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

(NIEHS) Nat. Institute of General Medical Sciences

(NIGMS) Nat. Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Nat. Institute of Neurological Disorders and

Stroke (NINDS) Nat. Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) Nat. Library of Medicine (NLM) Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center (CC) Center for Information Technology (CIT) Nat. Center for Complementary and Alternative

Medicine (NCCAM) Nat. Center for Research Resources (NCRR) John E. Fogarty InterNat. Center (FIC) Center for Scientific Review (CSR)

Page 54: Policy Analysis Models

Congressional Health Policy Committees

Senate Committee on Health and Labor

House Ways and Means Committee

Lobbyists

Page 55: Policy Analysis Models

Other Federal Health Policy

Supreme Court: Rulings on Assisted Suicide, Oregon scheme, etc.

EPACHAMPUS

Page 56: Policy Analysis Models

State and Local

State – State Legislative Committees– State Depts of Health– State Depts of Insurance Regulation– State Depts of Professional Regulation

Municipal and County Depts of HealthMicropolitics

– Hospitals

Page 57: Policy Analysis Models

COMPARATIVE SYSTEMS

Page 58: Policy Analysis Models

American Exceptionalism: Lack of Global Budgeting

Year in which elected representatives enacted universal

health care:

Germany1883

Switzerland 1911

New Zealand 1938

Belgium 1945

United Kingdom 1946

Sweden 1947

Greece 1961

Japan 1961

Canada 1966

Denmark 1973

Australia1974

Italy 1978

Portugal 1979

Spain 1986

South Africa 1996

Page 59: Policy Analysis Models

Causes of American Exceptionalism

Libertaran valuesWeak federal structuresRacial and ethnic diversityLack of a strong socialist

movement

Page 60: Policy Analysis Models

Over-Use of High-tech, Under-Use of Public Health

Over-specialization of physician labor force

Underuse of non-physician providersToo Few Primary Care DocsUnderinvestment in public health and

primary care

Page 61: Policy Analysis Models

Lack of Clear Priorities: Rationing

Priority-Setting in National Systems

British Informal RationingThe Oregon Approach

Page 62: Policy Analysis Models

Lack of Adequate Competition

Third Party Payment Makes No One Accountable

Health Purchasing Decisions are Too Complex 

Page 63: Policy Analysis Models

Canadian National Health Insurance (“Medicare”) 1946 - Swift Current, Sask. 1947 - Saskatchewan 1957 - Liberal government of Louis St. Laurent introduces a national

hospital insurance program. 1965 - Royal Commission headed by Emmett Hall calls for a universal

and comprehensive national health insurance program 1966 - Parliament enacts Bill 227, creating a national health insurance

system 1977 - Trudeau Liberals replaces from 50:50 cost-sharing with 5yr block

payments 1978 - Doctors begin “extra-billing” to raise their incomes above the

levels provided through public insurance schemes (1980-84) 1980-84 - CHC calls for Canada’s health care to reflect 5 principles:

public and non-profit; comprehensive; universal; portable; and accessible.

1984 - Canada Health Act

Page 64: Policy Analysis Models

British National Health Service

1942 - Beveridge report 1946 - The NHS Bill1948 – Implementation1980s – Thatcher reform attempts1991 – NHS Trusts2000 – Blair examining reforms

Page 65: Policy Analysis Models

Hospital Use per Capita in OECD, 2004

Page 66: Policy Analysis Models

Hospital Costs per Day in OECD, 1996

Page 67: Policy Analysis Models

Hospital Days

Page 68: Policy Analysis Models

Hospital Days, MI & Childbirth

Page 69: Policy Analysis Models

Doctor Visits per Capita

Page 70: Policy Analysis Models

Physician Incomes in OECD, 1996

• After adjusting for inflation, physician incomes increased most rapidly in the United States between 1965 and 1991

Page 71: Policy Analysis Models

Mean Physician Income 1992-1996

Managedcaremag.com

In 1973, the average income for physicians in private practice was $137,000, which was 4 times greater than the median income.

In 1997, the average income for physicians in private practice was $200,000, which was 10.6 times greater than the median U.S. income of $18,800.

Page 72: Policy Analysis Models

MRIs in the OECD, 2006

Page 73: Policy Analysis Models

INSURANCE AND MANAGED CARE

Page 74: Policy Analysis Models

Basic Ideas of Insurance

Risk poolsMeans testingRisk-rating and Community-ratingGuaranteed Issue, Renewability and

PortabilityPre-Existing ConditionsMandating Coverage

Page 75: Policy Analysis Models

What is Managed Care?

The Industrial Model Changes in Physician PracticeChanges in Physician Payment Exclusion of Expensive ProvidersChanges in Organizations

Page 76: Policy Analysis Models

Changes in Physician Practice

gate-keeping primary-care assignment pre-utilization authorizationutilization reviewdoc, unit, hospital & plan report cardspractice guidelines & critical pathways

Page 77: Policy Analysis Models

Where the Primary Care Docs Will Come From

Nurses, NPs, PAs

Family & General Practitioners

Internists

Retrained Specialists

Quasi-Primary

Primary Specialists

True Specialists

(Oncologists,Cardiologists,Rheumatologists) (Geriatrics, Pediatrics)

Page 78: Policy Analysis Models

Hospital Stays After Childbirth

Dr. Frank (Dartmouth Med School) studied 15,000 infants born in New Hampshire in 1993.

Of those newborns discharged early– 1.61% were re-admitted– additional 2.04% needed emergency care

among those who stayed at least two days, – 1.09% were re-admitted – 1.17% were treated in the emergency room.

The medical costs of all 361 infants who returned to the hospital was $670,000, while savings of discharging the 3600 newborns early was $7.5 million.

Page 79: Policy Analysis Models

Changes in Physician Payment

FFSCapitation“At-risk" capitation Salaried employment

Page 80: Policy Analysis Models

Physician Incentives

Salary

FFSCapitation

At-Risk Capitation

FFS with Ownership of Equipment

Have a Many Patients as Possible, But Do As Little As Possible For Them

Have a Many Patients as Possible, and Do As Much As Possible To Them

Have as Few Patients as Possible, and See Them As Little As Possible

Page 81: Policy Analysis Models

Exclusion of Expensive Providers

PPOs and "economic credentialing"

substitution for physicians: NPs, PAs, etc.

Gatekeeping

Page 82: Policy Analysis Models

Changes in Organizations

integration of all services and payments

shrinking hospitals: more ambulatory care, shorter stays, more home care

The Medical Loss Ratio

Page 83: Policy Analysis Models

Managed Care Models

Staff-Model HMOGroup-Model HMONetwork-Model HMOIndividual Practice Association (IPA)Point of Service (POS)Preferred Provider Organization (PPO)

Page 84: Policy Analysis Models

Alleged Decline of Managed Care

PPOs most popular PPOs contract with panels

of providers who agree to provide medical care and be paid according to a negotiated fee schedule.

Less oversight of services used than for HMOs.

Out-of-network visits more expensive but large numbers of providers often make going outside unnecessary.

Page 85: Policy Analysis Models

HMOs and Preventive Medicine

1. HMOs can't count of being rewarded for long-term investments

2. HMOs (and physicians) don't know how to deliver effective prevention, and to the extent that they have...

3. Effective prevention programs often are as expensive as treating the illness, especially across the life-course

4. Consequently, while there is plenty of evidence that HMOs have reduced tests, procedures and hospitalizations with little negative effect...

5. There is little evidence that HMOs provide more or better preventive medicine

Conclusion: If the only group sure to profit is society as a whole, than the appropriate investor is society.