pop art and semiotics. robert rauschenberg factum i & factum ii, 1957

68
Pop Art and Semiotics

Upload: arlene-hamilton

Post on 23-Dec-2015

261 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Pop Art and Semiotics

Page 2: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Robert RauschenbergFactum I & Factum II, 1957

Page 3: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Intro to Semiotics

Page 4: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Intro to Semiotics

Basic Terms

Sign - an object, quality, or event whose presence or occurrence indicates the probable presence or occurrence of something else

Signifier - a sign’s perceptible or physical form

Signified - the meaning, concept or idea expressed by a sign, distinct from its form

Page 5: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Intro to Semiotics

Basic Terms

Sign - an object, quality, or event whose presence or occurrence indicates the probable presence or occurrence of something else

=

Signifier - a sign’s perceptible or physical form

+

Signified - the meaning, concept or idea expressed by a sign, distinct from its form

Page 6: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Intro to Semiotics

René Magritte says that ‘This is not a pipe,” Yes…it is an image of a pipe, but what else?

Page 7: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Intro to Semiotics

SignA sign is anything that makes meaning. It is made up of the signifier and the signified. The signifier is the material and the signified is the concept

Page 8: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Roland Barthes: Mythologies

I am at the barber's, and a copy of Paris-Match is offered to me. On the cover, a young Negro in a French uniform is saluting, with his eyes uplifted, probably fixed on a fold of the tricolour. All this is the meaning of the picture. But, whether naively or not, I see very well what it signifies to me: that France is a great Empire, that all her sons, without any colour discrimination, faithfully serve under her flag, and that there is no better answer to the detractors of an alleged colonialism than the zeal shown by this Negro in serving his soc-called oppressors. I am therefore again faced with a greater semiological system: there is a signifier, itself already formed with a previous system (a black soldier is giving the French salute); there is a signified (it is here a purposeful mixture of Frenchness and militariness); finally, there is a presence of the signified through the signifier.

Barthes, “Myth Today,” Mythologies, 1957

Page 9: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Intro to Semiotics

http://www.semiotic-analysis.com/case-studies/bt-classic-case-study-its-good-to-talk-an-oldie-but-a-goodie/

Page 10: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957
Page 11: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Richard Hamilton, Just what is it that makes today's homes so different, so appealing?, 1956

Page 12: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Pop Art

Pop Art was an art movement in the late 1950s and 1960s that reflected everyday life and common objects. Pop artists blurred the line between fine art and commercial art.

Brillo Soap Pads Box, 1964, AWF

Page 13: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Pop Art

Once you “got” Pop, you could never see a sign the same way again. And once you thought Pop, you could never see America the same way again.

--Andy Warhol

Page 14: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

“Pop Artists did images that anybody walking down the street could recognize in a split second…all the great modern things that the Abstract Expressionists tried so hard not to notice at all.”—Gretchen Berg.

Three Coke Bottles, 1962, AWF

Page 15: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

The Pop artists moved away from Abstract Expressionism, the dominant style of art in the 50s. The Abstract Expressionist evoked emotions, feelings and ideas through formal elements such as:

• Line• Color• Shape• Form• Texture

Jackson Pollock, Number 4, 1950Carnegie Museum of Art; Gift of Frank R. S. Kaplan/ARS

Page 16: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Pop Artists used common images from everyday culture as their sources including:

Roy Lichtenstein, Masterpiece, 1962

• Advertisements

• Consumer goods

• Celebrities

• Photographs

• Comic strips

Page 17: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Pop Artists used bold, flat colors and hard edge compositions adopted from commercial designs like those found in:

• Billboards

• Murals

• Magazines

• Newspapers

Campbell's Soup II, 1969, AWF

Page 18: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Pop Artists reflected 60’s culture by using new materials in their artworks including:

•Acrylic Paints

• Plastics

• Photographs

• Fluorescent and

Metallic colors

Robert Rauschenberg, Retroactive II, 1963

Page 19: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

As well as new technologies and methods:

• Mass production

• Fabrication

• Photography

• Printing

• SerialsClaes Oldenburg, Floor Burger 1962, Claes Oldenburg

Page 20: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Pop art was appealing to many viewers, while others felt it made fun of common people and their lives. It was hard for some people to understand why Pop Artists were painting cheap, everyday objects, when the function of art historically was to uphold and represent culture’s most valuable ideals.

Listerine Bottle, 1963, AWF

Page 21: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Andy Warhol was one of the most famous Pop Artists. Part of his artistic practice was using new technologies and new ways of making art including:

• Photographic Silk-Screening

• Repetition

• Mass production

• Collaboration

• Media events

Andy Warhol, Brillo Boxes installation,

Page 22: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Warhol appropriated (used without permission) images from magazines, newspapers, and press photos of the most popular people of his time

Silver Liz [Ferus Type], 1963, AWF

©2006 Life Inc.

Page 23: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Warhol used the repetition of media events to critique and reframe cultural ideas through his art

Jackie paintings, 1964, AWF

Page 24: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Warhol took common everyday items and gave them importance as “art” He raised questions about the nature of art:

Knives, 1981, AWF

What makes one work of art better than another?

Brillo Soap Pads Box, 1964, AWF

Page 25: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Pop artists stretched the definitions of what art could be and how it can be made.

“The Pop idea, after all, was that anybody could do anything, so naturally we were all trying to do it all…” ---Andy Warhol

photo by Hervé Gloaguen

Page 26: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

The art world today reflects many of the ideas, methods and materials initiated by the Pop Art movement.

Barbara Kruger, Untitled, 1991Courtesy: Mary Boone Gallery, NY

In Untitled, 1991, Barbara Kruger uses the iconography of the American flag

and hard edge graphics to pose a series of provocative questions about

American cultural values.

In Rabbit, 1986, artist Jeff Koons cast a mass-produced inflatable Easter bunny in highly polished stainless steel. The sculpture became iconic of art in the 1980s.

Jeff Koons, Rabbit, 1986, Jeff Koons

Page 27: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Détournement and Culture Jamming

Page 28: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

A détournement ([French for "rerouting", "hijacking") is a technique developed in the 1950s by the Letterist International,[1] and later adapted by the Situationist International (SI),[2][3] that was defined in the SI's inaugural 1958 journal as "[t]he integration of present or past artistic productions into a superior construction of a milieu. In this sense there can be no situationist painting or music, but only a situationist use of those means. In a more elementary sense, détournement within the old cultural spheres is a method of propaganda, a method which reveals the wearing out and loss of importance of those spheres."[3][4] It has been defined elsewhere as "turning expressions of the capitalist system and its media culture against itself"[5]—as when slogans and logos are turned against their advertisers or the political status quo.[6] Détournement was prominently used to set up subversive political pranks, an influential tactic called situationist prank that was reprised by the punk movement in the late 1970s[7] and inspired the culture jamming movement in the late 1980s.[5]

Its opposite is recuperation, in which radical ideas are twisted, commodified, and absorbed in a more socially acceptable context

Page 29: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Marcel DuchampBicycle Wheel

1913wheel on painted stool

51 x 25 x 16 1/2"

Page 30: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Marcel DuchampFountain

1917Urinal

dimensions familiar

Page 31: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Marcel DuchampIn Advance of the

Broken Arm

1915 (original)Snow Shovel

dimensions familiar

Page 32: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Marcel DuchampL.H.O.O.Q.

1919pencil, readymade

19.7 x 12.4 cm

Page 33: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Enrique ChagoyaCrossing I

1994Acrylic and oil on paper

48" x 72"

Page 34: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Enrique Chagoya

Return to Goya's Caprichos

1999Etching, aquatint,

drypoint14 1/2" x 11"

Page 35: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Francisco José de Goya

El Sueño de la Razón Produce Monstruos

1799Etching on paper

21.5cm x 15cm

Page 36: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Enrique Chagoya

Misadventures of the Romantic Cannibals

2003woodcut and 13 color

lithographdimensions variable

Page 37: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Enrique Chagoya

Misadventures of the Romantic Cannibals,

detail

2003woodcut and 13 color

lithographdimensions variable"

Page 38: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Enrique Chagoya

Misadventures of the Romantic Cannibals, partially destroyed

2010

Page 39: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Carlos LatuffFrom The Coca Cola

Series

2003Digital Image

Page 40: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Carlos LatuffFrom The Coca Cola

Series

2003Digital Image

Page 41: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Carlos LatuffFrom The Coca Cola

Series

2003Digital Image

Page 42: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Elizabeth WongDétourned 7/11 Sign

2011Digital Image

Page 43: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Elizabeth WongDétourned Cadbury

Wrapper

2011Digital Image

Page 44: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

EyesawUnhealthy Balance

2011Bus stop advertisement

Dimensions Variable

Page 45: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

EyesawBurger King

2011Bus stop advertisement

Dimensions Variable

Page 46: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Eyesaw Statement on the Work

• "Both pieces question and explore our unhealthy relationship with junk food. Logos and brand identity have been cut from the original bus shelter advertising posters and juxtaposed with Eyesaw"s silhouette figures to produce images of ironic truth. "Burger king" suggests that from childhood we are bribed by greedy corporations in an attempt to gain life long customer loyalty ignoring the facts that this type of food is detrimental to our health and leads to conditions such as obesity. "Unhealthy balance" asks the viewer to weigh up their options when thinking about dining out in the city, it also suggests that we find comfort in junk food."

Page 47: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

2horaBeauty not the Beast Series

2009London Tube advertisementDimensions

Variable

Page 48: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

2horaBeauty not the Beast Series

2009London Tube advertisementDimensions

Variable

Page 49: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

2horaBeauty not the Beast

Series

2009London Tube advertisement

Dimensions Variable

Page 50: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Ron English, SWOON, Jet Set Graffiti, Banksy

Santa's Ghetto Exhibition, Bethlehem

2007Wheat pasted prints,

spray paintDimensions Variable

Page 51: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Ron EnglishFrom Santa's Ghetto

Exhibition, Bethlehem

2007Wheat pasted printsDimensions Variable

Page 52: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Ron English Grade School Guernica2006

Giclee Print27' x 12'

Page 53: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Ron EnglishKillfrogs Sugar Smack

2010Digital Image

Dimensions Variable

Page 54: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Ron EnglishKillfrogs Sugar Smack

2010Print on Cereal BoxDimensions Variable

Page 55: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Ron EnglishCamel Junior, NYC

1991Wheat pasted billboard

Dimensions Variable

Page 56: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Ron EnglishForever Kool, Jersey

City

1995Wheat pasted billboard

Dimensions Variable

Page 57: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Billboard Liberation FrontDrink Yourself Blind

2005Wheat pasted billboard

Dimensions Variable

Page 58: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Billboard Liberation Front

Money to Burn

2008Wheat pasted billboard

Dimensions Variable

Page 59: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

BanksyNapalm

2004Screenprint

Dimensions Variable

Page 60: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

BanksyFTD

2006Screenprint

Dimensions Variable

Page 61: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Original FTD Logo

Page 62: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

BanksyHaring Dog, London

2010Wheat paste, spray paint

Dimensions Variable

Page 63: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

Keith HaringDog

1986Plywood, silkscreen49 1/2" x 37 3/4" x 11

1/2"

Page 64: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

BanksyParis

2006modified CD

Dimensions Variable

Page 65: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

BanksyParis

2006modified CD

Dimensions Variable

Page 66: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

BanksyParis

2006modified CD

Dimensions Variable

Page 67: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

RTMarkBarbie Liberation

Organization

1993modified Barbie and GI

JoeDimensions Variable

Page 68: Pop Art and Semiotics. Robert Rauschenberg Factum I & Factum II, 1957

The Yes MenDétourned New York

Times

2008newspaper

Dimensions Variable