port state control in the black sea region...harmonized system of port state control through the...

PORT STATE CONTROLIN THE BLACK SEA REGION

Annual Report 2014

BLACK SEA PORT STATE CONTROL SECRETARIATISTANBUL / TURKEY

DISCLAIMER

The inspection and detention data in this publication are derived from data input by the member Authorities. The BS MOU (its member Authorities, the Secretariat and BSIS Manager) will not be held liable for any loss, damage or harm resulting from the use of information contained in this publication, or any reliance on the data accuracy, completeness or timeliness.

This work may be reproduced in whole or part subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source but not for commercial usage or sale.

Further information may be obtained from:

Black Sea Port State Control SecretariatKemankefl Karamustafapafla Mah. Kemankefl Cad.No: 63, Kat: 4/412 Beyo¤lu 34425 ‹stanbul/TurkeyTel : +90 212 249 1728Fax : +90 212 292 5277e-mail : [email protected] : www.bsmou.org

This report will be available at www.bsmou.org

BLACK SEA MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL

iAnnual Report 2014

Foreword

We are pleased to present the fourteenth issue of the Annual Report on Port State Control in the Black Sea

region which is published under the auspices of the Port State Control Committee of the Black Sea MOU.

Port State Control is of particular importance to the BS MOU member Authorities due to the role of shipping

in region’s trade, the sensitivity of the Black Sea basin and its coastline to environmental damage. Thereby BS

MOU member Authorities have dedicated considerable resources to having a rigorous port State control program

of the highest standard.

PSC inspections are conducted to ensure that foreign ships visiting the Black Sea ports are seaworthy, do not

pose a pollution risk, provide a healthy and safe environment and comply with relevant international regulations

and within the scope of the member Authorities’ national governing laws and regulations.

Through computerized ship risk profile based targeting system and publication of the monthly ship watch list,

the BS MOU is increasing the pressure on the substandard ships to encourage them to improve their performance

or to force them to leave the region. The BS MOU Member Authorities’ objective is to inspect eligible ships

based on risk, with lower risk ships given a lower priority compared to those that have been identified as having

a higher risk factor. In the light of the Paris MOU NIR, further refinement of the ship targeting and inspection

system is underway.

This PSC Annual report covers the period between 1st January and 31st December 2014. During this period the

BS MOU member Authorities conducted a total of 5,092 initial inspections, representing 0.24 per cent increase

as compared with 5,080 initial inspections in 2013. The regional inspection rate is 69.41% which is 5.80% increase

compared with 2013. A total of 151 detentions were warranted to ships found with serious deficiencies. This

represents a detention percentage of 2.97% which is 0.65% decrease as compared with 184 detentions in 2013.

During 2014 a total of 18,350 deficiencies were recorded. The average number of deficiencies per inspection

was 3.60; resulting in a 0.14 deficiency point improvement.

In further promoting safety and environment protection, Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC)s are conducted

in conjunction with the Paris and Tokyo Memorandas. Between 1st September 2014 and 30th November 2014,

a CIC was carried out with respect to the STCW Hours of Rest.

The BS MOU member Authorities are committed to ensuring that only high-quality ships, operated by competent

crew, trade in the region, by investing considerable resources and effort in the creation and maintenance of a

PSC program to eliminate substandard vessels in the region.

Captain Marian POPESCUChairmanBS MOU PSC Committee

Hüseyin YÜCESecretary BS MOU Secretariat

ForewordTable of Contents2014 Annual ReportOverv›evPort State Control Comm›tteeBlack Sea Informat›on System (BSIS)Concentrated Inspect›on Campa›gnTra›n›ngInterreg›onal Cooperat›on

Psc Inspect›ons 2014Reg›onal Inspect›on DataInspect›on Data by Author›tyInspect›on Data by FLAGInspect›on Data by Recogn›zed Organ›zat›onInspect›on Data by Sh›p TypeInspect›on Data by Def›c›ency

Port State Inspectıon Data for 2012-2014

L›st of Tables

iii1123344

5556778

9


iiAnnual Report 2014

Table of Contents

Table 1- 10 Year Summary of Inspections, Detentions and Deficiency RateTable 2- Inspection Data by Authority and RegionTable 3- 2014 Detentions by Flag, Exceeding Average Detention Percentage (Number of Inspections>10)Table 4- Inspection Data by FlagTable 5- Inspection Data by Recognized Organizations (Number of Inspections>10)Table 6- Inspection Data by Ship TypeTable 7- Inspection Data by Type of DeficienciesTable 8- Detentions and Average Detentions Percentage by Flag (2012-2014)Table 9- Inspection Data by Ship Type (2012-2014)Table 10- Inspection Data by Deficiency (2012-2014)

5569

111213141516

2014 Annual ReportOverv›ew

The Governments of Black Sea States in the “Strategic Action Plan for the Rehabilitation and Protection of the

Black Sea” (adopted at the Ministerial Conference held in Istanbul, 30-31 October, 1996) decided to launch a

harmonized system of port State control through the adoption of a Memorandum of Understanding on port State

control.

The Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control in the Black Sea Region (BS MOU) was completed

and signed in Istanbul, Turkey on 7 April 2000 by representatives of the Maritime Authorities of Bulgaria, Georgia,

Romania, the Russian Federation, Turkey and Ukraine.

On December 19, 2000 the Memorandum entered into force in the Black Sea region for three maritime States

accepted the BS MOU. By December 12, 2002 the BS MOU entered into effect for all maritime States in the

Black Sea, namely: Bulgaria, Georgia, Romania, the Russian Federation, Turkey and Ukraine.

The Port State Control Committee established under the Memorandum monitors and controls implementation

and on-going operation of the Memorandum. The Committee consists of representatives of the maritime

Authorities of the six member States and observers representatives from the International Maritime Organization

(IMO), the International Labour Organization (ILO). The Committee granted observer status to the USCG, Paris

MOU, MED MOU, West and Central Africa MOU, Riyadh MOU, the State Maritime Administration of the

Republic of Azerbaijan and Commission on the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution.

To coordinate daily activity of the organization, on the kind proposal by the Maritime Administration of Turkey,

the MOU Authorities decided to establish Headquarter and the Secretariat in Istanbul.

The Russian Federation has developed and launched the Black Sea Information System (BSIS), PSC computerized

information system for the Black Sea MOU, basing on the technique used for the Asia Pacific Computerized

Information System (APCIS), PSC information system for the Tokyo MOU, which was also developed by the

Russia Federation. The BSIS provides necessary tools to assist PSC Officers to conduct inspections. PSC Officers

use a comprehensive database which contains data received from a variety of sources on a large number of vessels.

This information includes the general particulars of a vessel, and its PSC inspection history.

To provide industry with the MOU news, procedures and inspection results the Black Sea MOU launched the

internet web-site at www.bsmou.org containing general information on MOU, regularly updated detention list.

Taking into account of successful operation of the BSIS, it was decided to start open publication of PSC inspection

results in internet through a direct link to the MOU database providing on-the-fly inspection results.

This annual report outlines recent activities on port State control in the Black Sea region, as well as international

perspectives on port State control and includes the statistical port State inspection data conducted by the member

Authorities of the BS MOU during the year 2014.


1Annual Report 2014

The Fifteenth Meeting of the Black Sea Port State Control Committee was held in Constanta, Romania from 8 to 10 April 2014. The meeting was chaired by Mrs. Radina RUSSEVA - Senior Expert European Union International Affairs and Projects Directorate Bulgarian Maritime Administration.

The meeting was attended by the member Authorities: Bulgaria, Georgia, Romania, the Russian Federation and Turkey. Representatives of the Republic of Azerbaijan, the Paris MOU, and the United State Cost Guard participated in the meeting as observers. The Mediterranean MOU was represented by the delegation of Turkey.

The member Authority of Ukraine, and observers from the International Maritime Organization (IMO), the International Labour Organization (ILO), the Abuja MOU, Riyadh MOU and the Commission on the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution were not able to attend.

Member Authorities presented information about their national arrangements for port State control activities including important organizational changes and availability of dedicated PSC structures.

The Committee agreed not to incorporate RO Performance List in the Annual report before taking decision on the determination of the RO performance model to be used in the ship risk profile matrix, since accurate reliable performance calculation models requires statistically significant amount of data. In this regards it was considered useful to elaborate alternatives for ranking of the RO performances.

The Committee considered draft amendments to the Memorandum regarding the introduction of a New Targeting and Inspection System in the BS MOU and agreed in principle to make necessary preparation and developments in order to launch New Targeting and Inspection System into operation by 1st January 2016. In this respect, the Committee also agreed:

• to review follow-up inspection scheme for further harmonization with the Paris MOU inspection scheme;• to compare the Tokyo and Paris MOU BGW List Models and possible alternatives for the Flag, RO

performance for the risk profile matrix; and • to investigate possibility to identify a technically simple and relaxed model.

The Committee approved the new structure and content of the PSC Manual in order further harmonization with the Paris MOU, in particular procedures on the relevant instruments and the amendments to the guidelines for the responsibility assessment of recognized organizations, amended guidelines on the detention review board and adopted new PSC guidelines on Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS) and revision to the followings taking into account revisions to the Paris MOU respective guidelines:

•Guidelines for the PSCO on the International Convention on Load Lines,•Guidelines for the PSCO on the MARPOL Annex I,•Guidelines on the inspection of Hours of Work/Rest and Fitness for Duty, and•Guidelines for PSC Inspection of Certification of Seafarers and Manning Requirements According to the

STCW convention, MLC and SOLAS.

Port State Control Comm›ttee


2Annual Report 2014


3Annual Report 2014

The Committee further agreed:

•on the revision of the Form A and Form B; •to study revision of the existing action taken codes in line the Paris MOU;

The Committee considering development of new guidelines, agreed on the development and incorporation of the following guidelines into the Manual with an effective date of 1st January 2015.

SOLAS Convention

•Guidelines on checking a VDR•Guidelines on Material Safety Data Sheets•Guidelines on Flag State exemptions•Guidelines for PSCO’s Thickness measurements•Guidelines for PSCO’s on checking ship’s hull thickness measurement on ships other than those covered

by ESP and CAS

MARPOL Convention

•Guidelines on crude oil washing •Guidelines on Unloading stripping and prewash operations under Annex II

The Committee further agreed on the incorporation of the Paris MOU “Definitions and Abbreviations” into the Manual for further harmonization with the Paris MOU with a view to avoid incorporate definitions into each guidelines.

In the light of the BS MOU follow-up action plan on the implementation of the Tokyo and Paris Memorandas Ministerial Declaration, the BS MOU has been conducting Concentrated Inspection Campaigns jointly with the Paris MOU and Tokyo MOU. In this respect the Committee agreed approve:

•Report on the result of the CIC on Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery; •the arrangements for the CIC on STCW Hours of rest to be carried out from 1st September to 30th

November 2014 with the Paris and the Tokyo MOU; and •the plan to conduct a joint CIC on Crew Familiarization Enclosed Space Entry with the Paris MOU in 2015.

In considering result of the CIC on Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery the Committee agreed to incorporate breakdown of the first three major non-compliances by ship flag, ship type and ship age.

The Committee reviewed and updated the list of the BS MOU follow-up actions emanating from the Second Joint Ministerial Conference of the Paris and Tokyo Memorandas on Port State Control in Canada 2004, work has been done, completed or in progress.

The Committee unanimously elected Captain Serban BERESCU (Romania) as Chairman and Captain Mamuka AKHALADZE as Vice Chairman of the Committee.

The committee agreed to conduct the BS MOU Port State Control Committee 16th meeting in Batumi, Georgia in April 2015.

The Black Sea Information System has been established in the Russian Federation, for the purpose of exchanging information on port State inspections, in order to make available to Authorities information on inspection of ships in other regional ports to assist them in their selection of foreign flag ships to be inspected and in the exercise of port State control on selected ships; and provide effective information exchange facilities regarding port State control in the region.

As the further step for providing more transparent and timely information on the BS MOU PSC activities, the Committee gave its approvals to on-line publication of the ship target factor, PSC inspection and detention data on the Memorandum web-site.

Black Sea Informat›on System (BSIS)

From 1st September 2014 to 30th November 2014, the BS MOU carried out a Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on STCW Hours of Rest. This campaign involved all member States of the BS MOU and was conducted in conjunction with the Paris MOU and Tokyo MOU. The Paris MOU Guidelines and Questionnaire were utilized.

Concentrated Inspect›on Campa›gn


4Annual Report 2014

Preliminary results from the campaign reveals that 6 ships were detained as a direct result of the CIC for deficiencies related to STCW Hours of Rest in the BS MOU region. During the campaign, a total of 1,146 inspections were carried out with the CIC questionnaire involving 1,146 individual ships. 21 ships were detained and 28.57% of these detentions were CIC-topic related. This means that in 6 cases the STCW Hours of Rest had deficiencies, which were serious enough to detain the ship resulting a CIC-topic related detention rate of 0.52%.

Concentrated inspection campaign in 2015

The BS MOU would join in with the Paris MOU and the Tokyo MOU to conduct a CIC on Crew Familiarization for Enclosed Space Entry which will be carried out from 1st September to 30th November 2015.

One PSCO from Georgia participated into the Paris MOU Expert Training Safety and Environment in Hague, Netherlands on 4-7 March 2014, one PSCO from Turkey participated into the Specialized Training the Inspection of Oil and Chemical Tanker and Gas Carriers in Hague, Netherlands on 15-18 April. One PSCO from Georgia participated into the Viña Del Mar Agreement and Tokyo MOU Expert Training Course which was held in Buenos Aires, Argentina, on 10-20 March 2014 and one PSCO from Turkey participated into the Tokyo MOU General Training Course for PSCO, Yokohama, Japan from 25 August to 19 September 2014.

PSCO Exchange Programme

Within the scope of regional and interregional PSCO Exchange Programmes two PSC officer exchanges were conducted in 2014, namely two PSCOs from Georgia to Romania, one PSCO from the Russian Federation to Turkey.

Tra›n›ng

The BS MOU currently has 6 members, some with dual or even triple membership: Bulgaria, Romania and the Russian Federation with the Paris MOU, while the Russian Federation is also a member of the Tokyo MOU, with Turkey there is further tie with the MED MOU.

In order to further strengthen co-operation with IMO, an agreement for co-operation was concluded with IMO, as an Intergovernmental Organization, which allows the BS MOU (and other MOUs) to submit papers and attend IMO meetings in its own rights. The BS MOU is represented at the IMO III sub-committee meetings and submitting its reports.

The BS MOU is accepted as an observer to several regional PSC agreements, that is, Paris MOU, Tokyo MOU, Mediterranean MoU, Viña Del Mar Agreement, and Indian Ocean MOU.

The BS MOU was represented by the Secretary at the Paris MOU PSCC47 meeting which was held in Vilnius, Lithuania from 19 to 23 May 2014.

The BS MOU was represented by the Secretary in the 1st session of the Implementation of IMO Instruments (III) Sub-Committee (14-18 July 2014) which was held in IMO Headquarter.

The BS MOU was represented by the Russian Federation at the PSCC21 meeting of the Viña Del Mar Agreement which was held in Antigua, Guatemala, from 13 to 17 October 2014.

The BS MOU was represented by the Republic of Turkey at the PSCC17 meeting of the MED MOU which was held in Tangier, Morocco from 28 to 30 October 2014.

The BS MOU was represented by the Russian Federation at the PSCC25 meeting of the Tokyo MOU which was held in Queenstown, New Zealand from 10 to 13 November 2014.

The BS MOU represented by the Republic of Turkey at the 27th and 28th meetings of the Paris MOU Technical Evaluation Group, which were held in Nantes, France from 11 to 13 December 2014 and the Hague, the Netherlands from 17 to 18 February 2015.

The Secretary attended the 2nd meeting of the Heads of Maritime Administrations of Member States form East Europe and West Asia and Seminar on acceptance and implementation of IMO instruments (Varna, Bulgaria 15-17 September 2014).

Interreg›onal Cooperat›on


5Annual Report 2014

PSC Inspect›ons 2014Reg›onal Inspect›on DataDuring the 2014 calendar year 5,368 individual ship visited inspection ports in the Black Sea region in which 3,726 (69.41%) individual ships inspected and 144 (3.86%) individual ships detained. The number of individual ships inspected in 2014 (3,726) is slightly increased compared with the number of individual ships inspected in 2013 (3,681) despite to 7.22 per cent decrease of the individual ship visit in 2014 as compared with 5,786 individual ship visits in 2013.

5,092 inspections carried out onboard 3,726 individual ships registered by 76 flag Administration. The number of inspections in 2014 (5,092) increased over 2013 (5,080).

The overall detention percentage in the region was 3.62% in 2013; in 2014 it decreased down to 2.97% as a per cent of inspections, rather than the number of individual ships inspected to take into account that many ships are detained more than once during any one year. Regional detention rate (percentage of number of individual ships inspected) is 3.86% which is lower than 5.60% in 2013.

The number of ships detained in 2014 for deficiencies clearly hazardous to safety, health or environmental amounted to 151. It compares with the number of detained 184 in 2013, 215 in 2012. Number of inspections decreased 12 (0.24%), total number of detentions decreased 33 (17.93%) which resulted 0.65% decrease in detention percentage in 2013 (3.62%). Table 1 displays 10-year summary of inspection, detention and deficiency rate.

Table 2 displays regional individual ship visit and inspection data (last line) together with the Authority inspection data. Inspection and detention rates by Authority are displayed in Figure 1.

The BS MOU member Authorities contributions into the regional inspection efforts displayed with Table 1. Member Authorities inspection rates (percent of number of individual ships inspected) varied between 31.76% and 59.44%. Regional inspection rate is 69.41%. Detention percentage of the member Authorities are varied from 0.65 to 5.08 per cent.

Average per cent of inspections with deficiencies in 2014 (59.92%) is 5,16 per cent lower than 2013 (65.08%). Per cent of inspections with deficiencies varies from 49.74 per cent up to 69.23 per cent in the region.

Inspect›on Data by Author›ty

(1) Data only Black Sea Ports, (2) Individual ships inspected in % of individual ships visited(3) Number of individual ships detained in % of individual ships visited, (4) Detentions in % of inspections

Table 2- Inspection Data by Authority and Region

BULGARIA

GEORGIA

ROMANIA

RUSSIA(1)

TURKEY(1)

UKRAINE

REGIONAL

AUTHORITY

NO. O

F IN

DIVI

DUAL

SH

IP V

ISIT

S

1,461

826

1,987

2,155

1,027

2,423

5,368

464

353

729

1,281

394

1,371

3,726

NO. O

F IN

DIVI

DUAL

SHIP

S IN

SPEC

TED

333

208

464

1,008

274

764

3.051

NO. O

F IN

SPEC

TION

S W

ITH

DEFI

CIEN

CIES

NO. O

F FO

LLOW

-UP

INSP

ECTI

ONS

15

218

66

743

170

382

1,594

NO. O

F IN

SPEC

TION

S

494

369

775

1,456

462

1,536

5,092

NO. O

F DE

FICI

ENCI

ES

1,862

2,054

2,195

7,965

1,453

2,821

18,350

NO. O

F IN

DIVI

DUAL

SHIP

S DE

TAIN

ED

17

11

24

74

15

10

151

DETE

NTIO

N RA

TE(3

)

3.66

3.12

3.29

5.78

3.81

0.73

3.86

DETE

NTIO

NPE

RCEN

TAGE

(4)

3.44

2.98

3.10

5.08

3.25

0.65

2.97

% O

F IN

SPEC

TION

SW

ITH

DEFI

CIEN

CIES

67.41

56.37

59.87

69.23

59.31

49.74

59.92

NO. O

F DE

TENT

IONS

INSP

ECTI

ON R

ATE(2

)

31.76

42.74

36.69

59.44

38.36

56.58

69.41

AVER

AGE

NO. O

FDE

FICI

ENCI

ESPE

R IN

SPEC

TION

% O

F M

OU T

OTAL

DETE

NTIO

NS W

ITH

RORE

LATE

D DE

TAIN

ABLE

DEFI

CIEN

CIES

9.70

7.25

15.22

28.59

9.07

30.16

3.77

5.57

2.83

5.47

3.15

1.84

3.60

3

0

1

2

1

0

7

17

11

24

74

15

10

144

Table 1- 10 Year Summary of Inspections, Detentions and Deficiency Rate

Number of InspectionsNumber of DetentionsDetention %Deficiencies / Inspection

20055,0693166.234.53

20064,6582595.564.90

20074,4993678.165.51

20085,1613296.374.87

20094,8052785.794.76

20104,9292865.804.35

20114,6572495.354.13

20124,6072154.673.89

20135,0801843.623.74

20145,0921512.973.60


6Annual Report 2014

Inspect›on Data by Flag

Inspections in 2014 were carried out on ships registered under 76 flags. The majority of inspections were Malta (12.5%), Panama (12.30%), and Turkey (8.6%) flagged vessels, with large number from Liberia (7.4%), Russia (6.3%), Marshall Islands (5.9%) and Moldova (5.9%) which represents 56.44 per cent of total inspections, amounted to 2,874 inspections.

In 2014, ships registered under 51 foreign flags were observed to have deficiencies sufficiently serious to impair the seaworthiness and warrant detention. High detention percentage observed Moldova (10.06%), Tanzania (9.76%) and Togo (7.69%) flagged vessels. Table 3 illustrates inspections data by flags exceeding average detention percentage (with inspections more than 10).

Table 3- 2014 Detentions by Flag, Exceeding Average Detention Percentage (Number of Inspections>10)

Figure 1- Inspection and Detention Rates by Authority

70,0

60,0

50,0

40,0

30,0

20,0

10,0

0,0

31,7

6

UKRAINETURKEYRUSSIAROMANIAGEORGIABULGARIA

3,66

42,7

4

3,12

36,6

9

3,29

59,4

4

5,78

38,3

63,

81

56,5

80,

73

REGIONAL

69,4

1

3,86

%

Detention Rate

Inspection Rate

FLAG

96

95

39

66

128

9

504

42

55

49

57

324

47

41

22

NUM

BER

OFIN

DIVI

DUAL

SHIP

VIS

ITS

NUM

BER

OFIN

DIVI

DUAL

SHIP

S IN

SPEC

TED

NUM

BER

OFIN

SPEC

TION

S

NO. O

FIN

SPEC

TION

SW

ITH

DEFI

CIEN

CIES

NUM

BER

OFDE

FICI

ENCI

ES

NUM

BER

OFDE

TENT

IONS

DETE

NTIO

NPE

RCEN

TAGE

% O

FIN

SPEC

TION

SW

ITH

DEFI

CIEN

CIES

EXCE

SS O

FAV

ERAG

E

96

92

34

63

111

7

455

40

45

45

54

281

38

22

21

147

165

75

101

179

16

626

66

74

82

104

437

53

25

32

118

157

67

75

165

14

377

49

59

79

101

291

36

14

29

776

1361

482

455

1260

85

2,387

363

424

784

764

1,541

241

75

154

6

14

6

5

18

1

22

3

4

8

8

14

4

1

2

4.08

8.48

8.00

4.95

10.06

6.25

3.51

4.55

5.41

9.76

7.69

3.20

7.55

4.00

6.25

80.27

95.15

89.33

74.26

92.18

87.50

60.22

74.24

79.73

96.34

97.12

66.59

67.92

56.00

90.63

1.11

5.51

5.03

1.98

7.09

3.28

0.54

1.58

2.44

6.79

4.72

0.23

4.58

1.03

3.28

Belize

Cambodia

Comoros

Cook Islands

Moldova, Republic of

Palau

Panama

Saint Kitts and Nevis

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Tanzania, United Republic of

Togo

Turkey

Ukraine

United Kingdom

Vanuatu

When considering the breakdown of ships inspected by ship type, largest group of the ship inspected during 2014 were general cargo/multi purpose ships with 2,129 (41.8%) inspections; bulk carrier 1,532 (31.0%) and oil tanker 558 (11.0%) were also inspected which represent 82.9 per cent of inspections amounted 4,219 inspections.

Majority of detained ships were type of general cargo/multi purpose ships with 94 (62.25%) detentions and bulk carriers with 28 (18.54%) detentions and followed by RO-Ro cargo ships with 10 (6.62%) detentions which were accounted for 87.42% of the total detentions Higher per cent of detentions were with Ro-Ro passenger ship (9.71%) Ro-Ro passenger ships (9.68%), other special activities (6.00%) and general cargo/multi-purpose ships (4.42%) (number of inspections more than 10). Figure 3 shows how the ship types inspected performed with regards to detention.


7Annual Report 2014

Inspect›on Data by Recogn›zed Organ›zat›on

The majority of ships inspected are in class with the Nippon Kaiji Kyokai (18.1%), Bureau Veritas (18.0%), Russian Maritime Register of Shipping (15.6%), Lloyd's Register (14.7%) and Germanischer Lloyd (12.0%). Higher per cent of detentions were with Phoenix Register of Shipping (9.80%), Isthmus Bureau of Shipping, S.A. (9.27%), followed by International Naval Surveys Bureau (9.27%) and Macosnar Corporation (8.89%) (with inspections more than 30). Higher per cent of inspections with deficiencies were Global Marine Bureau Inc. (95.35%), International Register of Shipping (94.62%), Maritime Lloyd Ltd, Georgia (94.20%) followed by International Naval Surveys Bureau (92.72%) and Dromon Bureau of Shipping (91.73%) (with inspections more than 30).

Inspect›on Data by Sh›p Type

Figure 2- Ratio of Share of Inspections to the Share of Detentions for Ship Types with Detentions

4

1,62

2,40

2,93

0 1

Oil tanker

Chemical tanker

Container

Gas carrier

Bulk carrier

Livestock carrier

General cargo / multi-purpose

Other special activites

Ro-Ro passenger ship

Ro-Ro cargo

Commercial yacht

3,31

2 3

1,87

0,67

1,07

0,49

0,31

5

0,31

0,06

15,4213,67

A total of 18,350 deficiencies were recorded during the port State control inspections in 2014. Majority of the deficiencies found upon inspection in 2014 were related to safety of navigation (18.08%), life saving appliances (13.67%), fire safety measures (8.54%) and living and working conditions-working conditions (8.50%) and these four categories make up 48.79% of the total deficiencies found.

Number of ISM related deficiencies were 523 which accounted for 2.85 per cent of the deficiencies, 285 marine pollution MARPOL Annex I related deficiencies observed accounting 1.55 per cent of the total deficiencies.

A total 506 detainable deficiencies and 30 RO related detainable deficiencies were recorded during the port State control inspections. 2.76 per cent of deficiencies in 2014 were detainable deficiencies, 5.93 per cent of detainable deficiencies in 2014 were RO related.

Majority of the detainable deficiencies found upon inspections in 2014 were related to lifesaving appliances (15.42%), safety of navigation (14.23%), fire safety measures (10.28%), followed by emergency systems (9.09%) and ISM (8.70%). These five categories make up 57.71% of the total detainable deficiencies found.

Majority of the RO related detainable deficiencies found upon inspection in 2014 were related to Water/Weathertight conditions (20.00%), lifesaving appliances (16,67%), structural conditions (13.33%), safety of navigation (13.33) and ISM (13.33). These five categories make up 76.67% of the total detainable deficiencies found. Average number of detainable deficiencies and RO related detainable deficiencies were 3.35 and 0.20 per detention.

Inspect›on Data by Def›c›ency


8Annual Report 2014

Figure 3- Major Deficiencies and Detainable Deficiencies as a Percent of Total Deficiencies

8,54

14,23

0 6

Safety of Navigation

Life Saving Apliances

Fire Safety

Living and Working Conditions-Working Conditions

Certificate and Documentation-Documents

Labour Conditions-Health Protection, Medical Care, Social Security

Radio Communications

Certificate and Documentation-Ship Certificates

Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery

Emergency Systems

Water/Weathertight Conditions

Structural Conditions

ISM

Certificate and Documentation-Crew Certificates

18,08

12

10,28

2 8 18

8,50

2,77

7,602,17

5,931,78

5,11

5,73

4,892,96

4,17

1,98

4,06

9,09

% of total deficiencies % of total detainable deficiencies

4 10 14 16

3,99

6,523,46

7,512,85

8,70

1,89

3,75


9Annual Report 2014

Port State Inspect›on Data for 2012-2014

Table 4- Inspection Data by Flag

1

119

1

111

3

14

6

147

1

2

24

165

7

28

75

101

8

4

36

18

4

15

3

3

5

4

27

125

1

175

8

1

5

1

22

2

78

1

1

68

1

54

2

11

2

118

0

2

12

157

1

5

67

75

3

2

18

12

3

11

2

1

3

2

15

35

1

65

2

1

3

1

9

1

28

0

1

105

1

95

2

12

5

96

1

1

11

92

7

24

34

63

8

4

35

17

3

8

3

3

3

4

24

112

1

154

8

1

5

1

18

2

64

1

100.00

57.14

100.00

48.65

66.67

78.57

33.33

80.27

0.00

100.00

50.00

95.15

14.29

17.86

89.33

74.26

37.50

50.00

50.00

66.67

75.00

73.33

66.67

33.33

60.00

50.00

55.56

28.00

100.00

37.14

25.00

100.00

60.00

100.00

40.91

50.00

35.90

0.00

0.00

0.84

0.00

0.90

33.33

0.00

0.00

4.08

0.00

0.00

0.00

8.48

0.00

0.00

8.00

4.95

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.57

12.50

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

3

421

3

234

28

50

2

776

0

34

46

1361

15

14

482

455

13

3

91

66

22

49

6

10

15

8

79

131

4

318

15

10

9

3

48

14

140

0

0

1

0

1

1

0

0

6

0

0

0

14

0

0

6

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

NUM

BER

OFIN

SPEC

TION

SW

ITH

DETE

NTIO

NS

NUM

BER

OFIN

SPEC

TION

S

% O

FIN

SPEC

TION

SW

ITH

DEFI

CIEN

CIES

FLAG

NUM

BER

OFDE

FICI

ENCI

ES

DETE

NTIO

NPE

RCEN

TAGE

Algeria

Antigua and Barbuda

Austria

Bahamas

Bangladesh

Barbados

Belgium

Belize

Bermuda (GB)

Bolivia

Bulgaria

Cambodia

Cayman Islands (GB)

China

Comoros

Cook Islands

Croatia

Curacao

Cyprus

Denmark

Dominica

Egypt

Ethiopia

France

Georgia

Germany

Gibraltar (GB)

Greece

Honduras

Hong Kong, China

India

Indonesia

Iran, Islamic Republic of

Ireland

Isle of Man (GB)

Israel

Italy

Jamaica

INSP

ECTI

ONS

WIT

HDE

FICI

ENCI

ES

NUM

BER

OFIN

DIVI

DUAL

SHIP

SIN

SPEC

TED


10Annual Report 2014

6

10

17

376

5

3

2

1

636

300

179

2

1

94

20

16

626

5

1

11

1

320

66

74

73

121

8

8

1

82

16

104

437

6

53

25

32

3

5,092

6

8

14

177

1

1

1

1

275

147

165

2

0

34

7

14

377

1

1

6

1

212

49

59

63

56

6

6

0

79

9

101

291

5

36

14

29

3

3,051

4

9

9

314

3

2

2

1

488

256

111

1

1

82

18

7

455

5

1

10

1

246

40

45

42

110

7

4

1

45

12

54

281

4

38

22

21

3

3,726

100.00

80.00

82.35

47.07

20.00

33.33

50.00

100.00

43.24

49.00

92.18

100.00

0.00

36.17

35.00

87.50

60.22

20.00

100.00

54.55

100.00

66.25

74.24

79.73

86.30

46.28

75.00

75.00

0.00

96.34

56.25

97.12

66.59

83.33

67.92

56.00

90.63

100.00

59.92

16.67

10.00

0.00

1.33

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.57

1.33

10.06

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

6.25

3.51

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

2.50

4.55

5.41

1.37

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

9.76

0.00

7.69

3.20

0.00

7.55

4.00

6.25

0.00

2.97

47

42

50

954

5

1

10

3

1364

738

1260

20

0

135

39

85

2387

12

1

42

10

1018

363

424

368

260

19

32

0

784

48

764

1541

61

241

75

154

15

18,350

1

1

0

5

0

0

0

0

10

4

18

0

0

0

0

1

22

0

0

0

0

8

3

4

1

0

0

0

0

8

0

8

14

0

4

1

2

0

151

NUM

BER

OFIN

SPEC

TION

SW

ITH

DETE

NTIO

NS

NUM

BER

OFIN

SPEC

TION

S

% O

FIN

SPEC

TION

SW

ITH

DEFI

CIEN

CIES

FLAG

NUM

BER

OFDE

FICI

ENCI

ES

DETE

NTIO

NPE

RCEN

TAGE

Kiribati

Korea, Republic of

Lebanon

Liberia

Libyan Arab Jamahiriya

Lithuania

Luxembourg

Malaysia

Malta

Marshall Islands

Moldova, Republic of

Mongolia

Montenegro

Netherlands

Norway

Palau

Panama

Philippines

Poland

Portugal

Qatar

Russian Federation

Saint Kitts and Nevis

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Sierra Leone

Singapore

Switzerland

Syrian Arab Republic

Taiwan, China

Tanzania, United Republic of

Thailand

Togo

Turkey

Tuvalu

Ukraine

United Kingdom

Vanuatu

Vietnam

TOTAL

INSP

ECTI

ONS

WIT

HDE

FICI

ENCI

ES

NUM

BER

OFIN

DIVI

DUAL

SHIP

SIN

SPEC

TED



Table 5- Inspection Data by Recognized Organizations (Number of inspections>10)

Note : Number of inspections and detentions are calculated corresponding to each recognized organization (RO) that issued certificate(s) for a ship. In case that ship’s certificates were issued more than one ROs, the inspection and detention would be counted to each of them.

American Bureau of Shipping

American Register of Shipping

Bulgarian Register of Shipping

Bureau Veritas

China Classification Society

Columbus American Register

Det Norske Veritas

DNV GL AS

Dromon Bureau of Shipping

Germanischer Lloyd

Global Marine Bureau Inc.

Global Shipping Bureau Inc

Intermaritime Certification Services, ICS Class

International Naval Surveys Bureau

International Register of Shipping

Isthmus Bureau of Shipping, S.A.

Korean Register of Shipping

Lloyd's Register

Macosnar Corporation

Maritime Bureau of Shipping

Maritime Lloyd Ltd, Georgia

National Shipping Adjuster Inc.

Nippon Kaiji Kyokai

Other

Overseas Marine Certification Services

Panama Register Corporation

Panama Shipping Registrar Inc.

Phoenix Register of Shipping

Polski Rejestr Statkow (Polish Register of Shipping)

Registro Italiano Navale

Russian Maritime Register of Shipping

Shipping Register of Ukraine

Turkish Lloyd

Venezuelan Register of Shipping

NUM

BER

OFIN

SPEC

TION

S

NUM

BER

OFIN

SPEC

TION

SW

ITH

DEFI

CIEN

CIES

NUM

BER

OFDE

TENT

IONS

DETE

NTIO

NSW

ITH

RORE

LATE

DDE

TAIN

ABLE

DEFI

CIEN

CIES

RECOGNIZED

ORGANIZATION

NUM

BER

OFDE

FICI

ENCI

ES

NUM

BER

OFRO

REL

ATED

DEFI

CIEN

CIES

485

11

83

915

128

15

509

169

133

611

43

17

24

151

93

31

58

748

45

15

69

40

922

134

18

17

18

51

51

221

796

200

241

62

208

6

73

478

31

15

202

72

122

330

41

12

12

140

88

24

27

349

32

12

65

34

513

115

17

14

14

43

43

105

515

172

184

59

1017

49

455

2492

183

143

916

308

745

1883

369

75

169

1082

692

198

109

1580

315

75

570

253

2660

872

117

95

114

341

366

601

2809

1354

1051

564

2

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

10

0

4

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

10

0

3

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

1

5

1

5

17

1

1

2

1

3

8

3

0

3

14

8

3

1

5

4

2

6

1

16

6

1

0

3

5

1

2

24

21

10

5

Table 6- Inspection Data by Ship Type


Annual Report 2014

Bulk carrier

Chemical tanker

Combination carrier

Commercial yacht

Container

Gas carrier

General cargo/multipurpose

Heavy load

High speed passenger craft

Livestock carrier

MODU and FPSO

NLS tanker

Offshore supply

Oil tanker

Other special activities

Passenger ship

Refrigerated cargo

Ro-Ro cargo

Ro-Ro passenger ship

Special purpose ship

Tugboat

Vehicle carrier

Woodchip carrier

ALL TYPES

1,532

296

10

2

162

63

2,129

5

2

36

3

6

16

558

50

38

18

103

31

4

25

2

1

5,092

752

149

6

1

112

36

1.548

2

2

35

2

3

7

224

37

8

15

74

21

3

12

1

1

3,051

4,018

776

28

7

642

111

10,175

12

9

251

8

10

27

952

199

48

46

799

154

8

65

4

1

18,350

1.83

1.01

0.00

50.00

1.23

1.59

4.42

0.00

0.00

2.78

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.90

6.00

0.00

0.00

9.71

9.68

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

2.97

49.09

50.34

60.00

50.00

69.14

57.14

72.71

40.00

100.00

97.22

66.67

50.00

43.75

40.14

74.00

21.05

83.33

71.84

67.74

75.00

48.00

50.00

100.00

59.92

28

3

0

1

2

1

94

0

0

1

0

0

0

5

3

0

0

10

3

0

0

0

0

151

1,232

260

9

2

126

49

1,390

5

1

25

3

5

16

447

38

30

18

48

15

4

22

2

1

3,726

NUM

BER

OFIN

DIVI

DUAL

SHIP

SIN

SPEC

TED

NUM

BER

OFIN

SPEC

TION

S

NUM

BER

OF

INSP

ECTI

ONS

WIT

HDE

TENT

IONS

% O

FIN

SPEC

TION

SW

ITH

DEFI

CIEN

CIES

TYPE OF SHIP

NUM

BER

OFDE

FICI

ENCI

ES

DETE

NTIO

NPE

RCEN

TAGE

12

INSP

ECTI

ONS

WIT

HDE

FICI

ENCI

ES



Table 7- Inspection Data by Type of Deficiencies

NUM

BER

OF D

EFIC

IENC

IES

NUM

BER

OF D

ETAI

NABL

EDE

FICI

ENCI

ES

% O

F TO

TAL

RO R

ELAT

EDDE

TAIN

ABLE

DEF

ICIE

NCIE

S

NATURE OF DEFICIENCY

NUM

BER

OF R

O RE

LATE

DDE

TAIN

ABLE

DEF

ICIE

NCIE

S

% O

F TO

TAL

NUM

BER

OF D

EFIC

IENC

IES

% O

F TO

TAL

DETA

INAB

LEDE

FICI

ENCI

ES

898

347

1,395

634

732

745

938

51

1,568

46

326

1,559

3317

2,509

36

765

285

11

3

69

214

24

4

523

131

7

37

88

1,088

18.350

15

19

11

38

33

46

29

2

52

3

1

14

72

78

0

10

10

0

0

1

2

1

0

44

3

0

12

1

9

506

4.89

1.89

7.60

3.46

3.99

4.06

5.11

0.28

8.54

0.25

1.78

8.50

18.08

13.67

0.20

4.17

1.55

0.06

0.02

0.38

1.17

0.13

0.02

2.85

0.71

0.04

0.20

0.48

5.93

2.96

3.75

2.17

7.51

6.52

9.09

5.73

0.40

10.28

0.59

0.20

2.77

14.23

15.42

0.00

1.98

1.98

0.00

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.20

0.00

8.70

0.59

0.00

2.37

0.20

1.78

3.33

3.33

3.33

13.33

20.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

6.67

0.00

0.00

0.00

13.33

16.67

0.00

6.67

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

13.33

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1

1

1

4

6

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

4

5

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

4

0

0

0

0

0

30

Certificate and Documentation - Ship Certificates

Certificate and Documentation - Crew Certificates

Certificate and Documentation - Documents


Water/Weathertight conditions

Emergency Systems


Cargo operations including equipment

Fire safety

Alarms

Living and Working Conditions - Living Conditions

Living and Working Conditions - Working Conditions


Life saving appliances

Dangerous goods

Propulsion and auxiliary machinery

Pollution prevention - Marpol Annex I

Pollution prevention - Marpol Annex II

Pollution prevention - Marpol Annex III

Pollution prevention - Marpol Annex IV

Pollution prevention - Marpol Annex V

Pollution prevention - Marpol Annex VI

Pollution prevention - Anti Fouling

ISM

Other

Labour Conditions-Minimum requirements for seafarers

Labour Conditions-Conditions of employment

Labour Conditions-Accommodation, recreational facilities, food & catering

Labour Conditions-Health protection, medical care, social security

TOTAL



Table 8 - Detentions and Average Detentions Percentage by Flag (2012-2014)

Antigua and BarbudaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelizeBoliviaCambodiaComoresCook IslandsCuracaoDenmarkDominicaGeorgiaGreeceGibraltar (GB)Hong Kong, ChinaHondurasIsle of Man (GB)ItalyKribatiKorea, Democratic People`s RepublicKorea, Republic ofLebanonLiberiaLuxembourgMaltaMarshall IslandsMoldovaNetherlandsPakistanPalauPanamaRomaniaRussian FederationSaint Kitts and NevisSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSierra LeoneSyrian Arab RepublicSwitzerlandTanzaniaTogoTurkeyUkraineUnited KingdomVanuatuTotal

397320

819

4186

48424622023351828

26246

4191244

20824111833

10558

1743818608145

316

171311

9632082692561615

269247

14131888348

14779

NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS NUMBER OF DETENTIONS AVERAGEDETENTION %FLAG TOTAL2012

No percentage is shown when total number of inspection in three years was less than thirty.

20139831

161

41221511171112114111

191

271571311

681

249

121921

4626471313

550

431141

16821017100001101181

114

30310

240832910

256

19501

215

TOTAL2012441060

1188010001011020006067

23000

221836911

131214400

184

20131348328

1224

172943318111419

13420

1151

16100

818

12309

55162252256610

4948

29464

101949

109850

47975405

4607

2014144126

311

1492

14777865

2449

12826

1293

28108100

1021

3703

5912932047920

5933

34978948975

8993

497601811

5080

111060

14650000001100110050

104

18001

22083410088

14412

151

20142,272,50

3,83

8,478,946,82

2,86

0,382,170,24

2,270,48

3,031,80

1,551,83

11,682,07

3,97

2,494,334,467,42

17,1010,533,336,911,206,253,72

119111

30

1470

16575

101000000

1758006

1000

3760

636300179

00

16626

032066747300

82104437532532

5092

Port State Inspect›on Data for 2012-2014



Table 9 - Inspection Data by Ship Type (2012-2014)

TOTAL

4,018

776

28

7

642

111

10,175

12

9

251

8

10

27

952

199

48

46

799

154

8

65

4

1

18,350

INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONSWITH DEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OFDEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OFDETENTIONS

AVER

AGE

DETE

NTIO

N %TYPE

OFSHIP

TOTAL

4,105

878

10

339

277

4,335

2,142

19

68

38

21

27

1,083

683

99

141

173

159

59

4

67

8

3

14,779

TOTAL

2,123

448

6

212

175

3,337

1,556

16

65

36

9

15

470

322

59

83

146

121

43

3

39

5

2

9,359

TOTAL

84

8

0

12

4

271

94

3

6

1

0

0

8

18

3

4

14

14

6

0

0

0

0

550

AVER

AGE

% O

F IN

S.W

ITH

DEFI

CIEN

CIES

AVER

AGE

NO. O

FDE

FICI

ENCY

PER

INSP

ECTI

ON

2.0

0.9

0.0

3.5

1.4

6.3

4.4

15.8

8.8

2.6

0.0

0.0

0.7

2.6

3.0

2.8

8.1

8.8

10.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0,0

3.7

51.7

51.0

60.0

62.5

63.2

77.9

72.6

84.2

95.6

94.7

42.9

55.6

43.4

47.1

59.6

58.9

84.4

76.1

72.9

75.0

58.2

62.5

66.7

63.3

2.7

2.5

2.8

3.6

3.2

5.0

4.8

5.2

8.5

6.8

1.6

2.1

1.7

2.3

3.2

3.4

6.8

7.1

4.7

9.8

2.0

1.6

1.0

3.7

Bulk Carrier

Chemical Tanker

Commercial Yacht

Container Ship

Gas Carrier

General Cargo/ Multi-purpose Ship

Heavy Load Carrier

High Speed Passenger Craft

Livestock Carrier

MODU and FPSO

NLS Tanker

Offshore Supply

Oil Tanker

Other Special Activities

Passenger Ship

Refrigerated CargoCarrier

Ro-Ro Cargo Ship

Ro-Ro Passenger Ship

Special Purpose Ship

Tanker, notOtherwise Specified

Tugboat

Vehicle Carrier

Woodchip Carrier

TOTAL

2012 2012 2012 20122014

1,179

276

0

160

49

2,063

5

5

38

1

11

13

515

59

17

51

75

28

20

0

20

0

0

4,607

2014 2014 2014

623

136

0

100

25

1,614

2

5

36

0

6

9

231

50

6

31

65

24

19

0

7

0

0

3,002

3,477

674

0

547

118

10,480

5

32

309

0

14

34

816

334

29

187

496

174

102

31

0

0

0

17,926

29

4

0

8

1

147

0

3

2

0

0

0

2

8

0

2

4

2

3

0

0

0

0

215

1,532

296

10

2

162

63

2,129

5

2

36

3

6

16

558

50

38

18

103

31

4

25

2

1

5,092

752

149

6

1

112

36

1,548

2

2

35

2

3

7

224

37

8

15

74

21

3

12

1

1

3,051

11,198

2,169

28

1,232

883

21,487

10,205

99

580

258

33

57

1,841

1,544

313

477

1,185

1,122

278

39

134

13

3

55,298

28

3

0

1

2

1

94

0

0

1

0

0

0

5

3

0

0

10

3

0

0

0

0

151

2013

1,394

306

0

177

66

2,209

8

9

28

1

7

8

552

66

32

52

80

28

8

0

22

6

2

5,080

2013

748

163

0

111

38

1,727

6

9

27

1

1

3

232

48

16

44

66

23

3

0

20

4

1

3,306

3,703

719

0

678

123

10,896

25

55

262

7

11

13

998

258

85

242

643

149

22

0

69

9

2

19,022

2013 2013

27

1

0

3

1

123

0

0

4

0

0

0

6

5

0

2

10

2

0

0

0

0

0

184



2012 20122014 2012

Table 10 - Inspection Data by Deficiency (2012-2014)

Certificate and Documentation -Ship Certificates

Certificate and Documentation - Crew Certificates

Certificate and Documentation -Documents


Water/Weathertight Conditions

Emergency Systems


Cargo Operations Including Equipment

Fire Safety

Alarms

Living and Working Conditions -Living Conditions

Living and Working Conditions - Working Conditions


Life Saving Appliances

Dangerous Goods

Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery

Pollution Prevention - Marpol Annex I

Pollution Prevention - Marpol Annex II

Pollution Prevention - Marpol Annex III

Pollution Prevention - Marpol Annex IV

Pollution Prevention - Marpol Annex V

Pollution Prevention - Marpol Annex VI

Pollution Prevention - Anti Fouling

ISM

Other

Labour Conditions-MinimumRequirements for Seafarers

Labour Conditions - Conditions of Employment

Labour Conditions - AccommodationRecreational Facilities, Food & Catering

Labour Conditions - Health Protection,Medical Care, Social Security

TOTAL

NUMBER OFDEFICIENCIES

NATURE OFDEFICIENCY

PERCENT OF THETOTAL

DEFICIENCIES

AVERAGE NUMBER OFDEFICIENCIES PERINSPECTIONSx100

AVERAGE NUMBER OFDEFICIENCIES PERINSPECTIONS WITHDEFICIENCIESx100

2012 2014

4,89

1,89

7,60

3,46

3,99

4,06

5,11

0,28

8,54

0,25

1,78

8,50

18,08

13,67

0,20

4,17

1,55

0,06

0,02

0,38

1,17

0,13

0,02

2,85

0,71

0,04

0,20

0,48

5,93

100,00

1030

240

1092

733

786

832

947

79

1709

109

512

2488

2837

2405

42

1035

261

8

6

65

73

56

3

424

154

17926

2014 2014

22,36

5,21

23,70

15,91

17,06

18,06

20,56

1,71

37,10

2,37

11,11

54,00

61,58

52,20

0,91

22,47

5,67

0,17

0,13

1,41

1,58

1,22

0,07

9,20

3,34

0,00

0,00

0,00

0,00

389,10

34,31

7,99

36,38

24,42

26,18

27,71

31,55

2,63

56,93

3,63

17,06

82,88

94,50

80,11

1,40

34,48

8,69

0,27

0,20

2,17

2,43

1,87

0,10

14,12

5,13

0,00

0,00

0,00

0,00

597,14

898

347

1395

634

732

745

938

51

1568

46

326

1559

3317

2509

36

765

285

11

3

69

214

24

4

523

131

7

37

88

1088

18350

5,75

1,34

6,09

4,09

4,38

4,64

5,28

0,44

9,53

0,61

2,86

13,88

15,83

13,42

0,23

5,77

1,46

0,04

0,03

0,36

0,41

0,31

0,02

2,37

0,86

0,00

0,00

0,00

0,00

100,00

17,64

6,81

27,40

12,45

14,38

16,63

18,42

1,00

30,79

0,90

6,40

30,62

65,14

49,27

0,71

15,02

5,60

0,22

0,06

1,36

4,20

0,47

0,08

10,27

2,57

0,14

0,73

1,73

21,37

360,37

27,16

10,50

42,20

19,18

22,14

22,53

28,37

1,54

47,43

1,39

9,86

47,16

100,33

75,89

1,09

23,14

8,62

0,33

0,09

2,09

6,47

0,73

0,12

15,82

3,96

0,21

1,12

2,66

32,91

555,05

2013

987

269

1252

687

731

824

1037

58

1744

73

435

2208

3401

2628

46

844

256

12

5

69

308

77

5

488

124

3

13

44

394

19022

2013

5,19

1,41

6,58

3,61

3,84

4,33

5,45

0,30

9,17

0,38

2,29

11,61

17,88

13,82

0,24

4,44

1,35

0,06

0,03

0,36

1,62

0,40

0,03

2,57

0,65

0,02

0,07

0,23

2,07

100,00

2013

19,43

5,30

24,65

13,52

14,39

16,22

20,41

1,14

34,33

1,44

8,56

43,46

66,95

51,73

0,91

16,61

5,04

0,24

0,10

1,36

6,06

1,52

0,10

9,61

2,44

0,06

0,26

0,87

7,76

374,45

2013

29,85

8,14

37,87

20,78

22,11

24,92

31,37

1,75

52,75

2,21

13,16

66,97

102,87

79,49

1,39

25,53

7,74

0,36

0,15

2,09

9,32

2,33

0,15

14,76

3,75

0,09

0,39

1,33

11,92

575,38

Mar›t›me Author›t›es

BulgariaBulgarian Maritime Administration Ministry of Transport,

Information Technology and Communication9, Dyakon Ignatiy St.,1000 Sofia Bulgaria

Tel: +359 2 930 0910 - Fax: +359 2 930 0920e-mail: [email protected]

GeorgiaMaritime Transport Agency

Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia23, Ninoshvili St., Batumi, 6000, Georgia

Tel: +995 422 74925 - Fax: +995 422 73929e-mail: [email protected]

RomaniaRomanian Naval Authority

Constanta Port No. 1 Gate 1-8700 Constanta, RomaniaTel: +40 241 61 6124 - Fax: +40 241 61 6229

e-mail: [email protected]

Russian FederationDepartment of the State Policy for Maritime and River Transport,

Ministry of Transport1, bldg 1, Rozhdestvenska St., Moscow 109012, Russia

Tel: +7 495 626 10 00 - Fax: +7 495 626 91 28; +7 495 626 90 38e-mail: [email protected]

TurkeyDirectorate General for Regulation of Maritime and Inland Waters

Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and CommunicationsHakk› Turayliç Cad. No: 5 Emek 06338 Ankara, Türkiye

Tel: +90 312 203 10 00 - Fax: +90 312 231 33 06e-mail: [email protected]

UkraineState Inspectorate of Ukraine for Maritime and Inland Water Transport Safety

14 Peremohy Ave., Kyiv, 01135, UkraineTel: +380 44 351 44 01 - Fax: +380 44 351 44 44

e-mail: [email protected]