positive clinical outcomes of the saphenous vein interposition technique for ruptured popliteal...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Positive clinical outcomes of the saphenous vein interposition technique for ruptured popliteal artery aneurysm](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030102/57509f171a28abbf6b16a08c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Positive clinical outcomes of the saphenous vein interpositiontechnique for ruptured popliteal artery aneurysm
Isa Coskun • Orhan Saim Demirturk •
Huseyin Ali Tunel • Cagatay Andic •
Oner Gulcan
Received: 24 May 2013 / Accepted: 20 August 2013
� Springer Japan 2014
Abstract
Purpose Popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) can be treated
successfully by surgical and endovascular methods; however,
the best treatment strategy for a ruptured PAA has yet to be
established. We assessed the clinical results of using saphe-
nous vein interposition to treat ruptured PAAs in our hospital.
Methods The subjects of this study were seven men
(average age 59 years, range 43–71 years), who underwent
emergency surgery for a ruptured PAA at our hospital
between January 2007 and November 2012. The patients
were assessed after 1, 6, and 12 months, postoperatively.
Results All included patients underwent saphenous vein
graft interposition via a medial approach. No complications
or graft thromboses were encountered in the immediate
postoperative period. The patients were discharged after an
average of 4 days postoperatively (range 3–5 days). The
patients were followed up for an average of 32 months
(range 2–60 months). The medium-term graft patency was
100 %. No patients suffered early or medium-term limb
loss and there was no mortality.
Conclusion Based on our positive results, saphenous vein
graft interposition should be considered as the first choice
of surgical treatment for a ruptured PAA.
Keywords Ruptured popliteal artery aneurysm � Surgical
treatment � Saphenous vein graft interposition
Introduction
Popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) is the most frequently
encountered peripheral artery aneurysm, with a reported
incidence of 0.1–2.8 % [1]. The major complications of
PAA are rupture, distal embolization, and thrombosis [2];
however, rupture is rare and described in the literature
solely as case reports [3]. Rupture has been reported to
occur in 1–5 % of PAAs [4].
In recent years, endovascular interventions have become
a treatment option for PAA, in addition to surgical treat-
ment, but there are few published studies on the treatment
of ruptured PAAs [5]. Consequently, the best treatment
strategy for PAAs remains uncertain. This study investi-
gates the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment in our
case series of seven patients who underwent emergency
surgery for ruptured PAA, using saphenous vein
interposition.
Methods
We evaluated retrospectively, seven patients who were
admitted to our clinic for ruptured PAA and treated with
emergency surgery between April 2007 and November
2012. In this series, PAA was diagnosed by color Doppler
ultrasonography (CDUS), magnetic resonance (MR) angi-
ography, computed tomography (CT) angiography
(Fig. 1a, b), or conventional angiography. All patients
included in the study were initially evaluated with CDUS
(Antares; Siemens; Erlangen; Germany). MR angiography
The paper has been presented as a poster presentation in the 14th
Congress of Asian Society for Vascular Surgery on October 26–29,
2013 in Istanbul, Turkey.
I. Coskun (&) � O. S. Demirturk � H. A. Tunel � O. Gulcan
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Baskent University
Faculty of Medicine, Dadaloglu mh. 39. Sk. No. 6,
01250 Adana, Turkey
e-mail: [email protected]
C. Andic
Department of Radiology, Baskent University Faculty of
Medicine, Adana, Turkey
123
Surg Today
DOI 10.1007/s00595-014-0891-7
![Page 2: Positive clinical outcomes of the saphenous vein interposition technique for ruptured popliteal artery aneurysm](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030102/57509f171a28abbf6b16a08c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
(Plus or Avanto; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), CT angi-
ography, or conventional angiography were performed as
additional tests. Peripheral angiographies were performed
at the angiography unit (Multisar, Siemens, Erlangen,
Germany or Innova 3100 IQ, General Electric, USA) under
local anesthesia, additional sedation, and analgesia.
Thromboembolic occlusion of the crural arteries was
diagnosed in three patients, the anterior and posterior tibial
arteries were occluded in two patients, the anterior and
posterior tibial arteries were occluded in one patient, and
the crural arteries were patent in the remaining patients.
Patients were operated on under general anesthesia. The
main femoral artery on the same side as the ruptured PAA
was controlled. The ipsilateral saphenous vein was harvested
supragenicularly to be used as an interposition graft. The
aneurysm was explored via a medial approach. The main
femoral artery was occluded following heparinization. The
aneurysm sac was opened and the thrombus contained within
was removed. The ostia of the proximal and distal popliteal
arteries were then prepared for anastomosis. Embolectomy
of the crural arteries was done for three patients who had no
backflow in their crural arteries. The prepared reverse
saphenous vein graft was interposed on the popliteal artery.
Proximal anastomosis was performed on the popliteal
arteries, while distal anastomosis was performed on the
trifurcation of the crural arteries in three patients, and on the
popliteal arteries of the other patients.
All patients were given low molecular weight heparin,
twice according to body weight, and oral anti-thrombotics,
as acetyl salicylic acid, 300 mg, following surgery. The
three patients with preoperative thromboembolic occlusion
of the crural arteries were also given warfarin as antico-
agulant treatment (INR: 2–3) for 6 months. Anti-throm-
botics were given as maintenance therapy to all patients.
Following the first control, the patients were requested to
attend follow-up controls 1, 6, and 12 months postopera-
tively, and then once every year thereafter. The distal
arterial pulses were evaluated during these controls. Graft
patency was controlled with CDUS (Fig. 1c).
Results
All of the patients in this study were men, with an age
average of 59 years (range 43–71 years). Clinical history
included coronary artery disease (n = 3), abdominal aorta
aneurysm (n = 1), bilateral PAA (n = 1), hypertension
(n = 4), hyperlipidemia (n = 5), smoking (n = 6), and
chronic kidney disease (n = 1). None of the patients had
diabetes mellitus.
Fig. 1 Image of a ruptured left
popliteal artery aneurysm prior
to surgical treatment in a
60-year-old man: a Computed
tomography (CT) angiography
axial cross-section image; b CT
angiography multi-planar
reformatting (MPR) coronal and
sagittal cross-section image;
c Color Doppler
ultrasonography gray scale
image following surgical
treatment
Surg Today
123
![Page 3: Positive clinical outcomes of the saphenous vein interposition technique for ruptured popliteal artery aneurysm](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030102/57509f171a28abbf6b16a08c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Three of the patients had marked ischemic symptoms
associated with thromboembolic occlusion of the crural
arteries. Three of the patients with ischemic symptoms had
a painful, cold, and pale extremity without a palpable
pulse, but there was no sensory or motor loss. These
patients had class IIA disease according to the Rutherford
classification. Symptoms such as pain and swelling asso-
ciated with the mass effect of the PAA were prominent in
four of the patients. The time between the onset of the
symptoms and the hospital admission was 12 days (range
2–30 days). There were no postoperative complications or
mortality. On average, patients were discharged from
hospital on postoperative day 4 (range, postoperative days
3–5).
Patients were followed up for an average of 32 months
(range 2–60 months). During follow-up, the patency and
distal circulation of the grafts were determined as normal in
all of the patients, none of whom lost an extremity. Table 1
summarizes the clinical data and surgical treatment out-
comes of the patients.
Discussion
Among the different types of peripheral artery aneurysm,
PAA is the most frequently encountered, with an incidence
of 0.1–2.8 % [1]. Rupture of these aneurysms is rare and
has been only been described in the literature as case
reports [3, 5]. The annual incidence of PAA rupture is
2.1 % [4]. Rupture of a PAA frequently causes pain, skin
erythema, and the formation of a pulsatile mass behind the
knee [6]. These symptoms are sometimes accompanied by
ischemic symptoms associated with distal thromboembo-
lism [7]. The most prominent presenting symptoms in this
series were ischemic symptoms associated with distal
thromboembolism, seen in three patients. The other four
patients complained only of pain, swelling behind the knee,
and skin erythema, all associated with the mass effect of
the aneurysm.
Diagnosing ruptured PAA is difficult when there are no
ischemic symptoms associated with the thromboembolic
occlusion of the crural arteries [8]. Three of our patients
presented to our hospital following the onset of ischemic
symptoms associated with thromboembolic occlusion of
the crural arteries, whereas four patients were admitted
with normal distal circulation. Various methods can be
used to diagnose a ruptured PAA, but in this series, we
used CDUS primarily. In patients who were clinically
suitable, MR angiography, CT angiography, and conven-
tional angiography were also done to measure the aneu-
rysm size and evaluate the crural arteries.
In addition to surgery, endovascular treatment methods
can also be used for PAA. In their clinical study, Pulli et al.
[9] concluded that surgical and endovascular treatment
have similar outcomes. Trinidad-Hernandez et al. [10]
reported a mortality rate of 6.4 %, a hematoma rate of
Table 1 Clinical data and treatment outcomes of the patients who underwent emergency surgery for a ruptured popliteal aneurysm
Age
(years)
Extremity Symptoms Aneurysm
diameter
(cm)
Crural
artery
status
Surgical treatment Duration of
follow-up
(months)
Patency on
follow-up
Status of
extremity
1 71 Left Popliteal swelling,
pain, and cold feet
5 Occluded Saphenous vein
graft
interposition
52 Open Normal
2 66 Right Popliteal swelling,
pain, erythema
10 Open Saphenous vein
graft
interposition
31 Open Normal
3 60 Left Popliteal swelling,
pain
9 Open Saphenous vein
graft
interposition
27 Open Normal
4 43 Left Popliteal swelling,
pain, and cold feet
9 Occluded Saphenous vein
graft
interposition
26 Open Normal
5 66 Left Popliteal swelling,
pain, and cold feet
8 Occluded Saphenous vein
graft
interposition
2 Open Normal
6 47 Left Popliteal swelling,
pain, erythema
5 Open Saphenous vein
graft
interposition
28 Open Normal
7 63 Right Popliteal swelling,
pain, erythema
5 Open Saphenous vein
graft
interposition
60 Open Normal
Surg Today
123
![Page 4: Positive clinical outcomes of the saphenous vein interposition technique for ruptured popliteal artery aneurysm](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030102/57509f171a28abbf6b16a08c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
13 %, a stent occlusion within 30 days rate of 29 %, an
endoleak rate of 13 %, a stent fracture rate of 3.2 %, and a
major adverse event rate of 35.5 %, in their study of
patients who underwent emergency and elective endovas-
cular surgery. The rate of major adverse events associated
with emergency endovascular treatments was found to be
higher than that associated with elective endovascular
treatment in patients who were anatomically suitable or for
whom surgery was considered too risky. Accordingly, in
the present study, endovascular treatment with stent grafts
had the highest rate of major adverse events under emer-
gency conditions, such as PAA rupture. Furthermore,
despite the high frequency of occlusions of stents inserted
in the arteries of the knee joint area, and other problems
such as early stent failure and stent migration, possibly
caused by the mobility of the knee joint area, many centers
still prefer endovascular treatment for PAA [11, 12].
Numerous types of grafts can be used in popliteal artery
surgery, including synthetic grafts (Dacron and polytetra-
fluoroethylene), biosynthetic grafts (Omniflow II�), and
autologous vein grafts [13]. Previous studies have shown
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts to be superior to
Dacron grafts [14], but Huang et al. [15] demonstrated that
autologous saphenous vein grafts had a higher patency rate
than PTFE grafts in their study. In recent years, biosyn-
thetic grafts (Omniflow II�) have also been used [16].
However, autologous saphenous vein grafts are still the
ideal type of graft [15, 17, 18].
For PAAs, saphenous vein graft interposition via the
medial approach is ideal [19]. In this series, we chose to
use autologous saphenous vein grafts considering the
higher rates of thrombosis and occlusion associated with
other types of grafts. The saphenous veins were obtained
from the region above the knee to avoid any incompati-
bility of the diameter between the graft and the popliteal
artery and there was no case of early or late graft
thrombosis.
There are numerous case reports describing the endo-
vascular and surgical treatment of ruptured PAAs [5, 20].
According to our search of the English language literature,
ours is the largest case series of ruptured PAA treated using
the saphenous vein interposition technique. We attribute
the clinical outcome and good graft patency to the use of
autologous vein grafts and to the close follow-up and
monitoring of the patients receiving antithrombotic and
anticoagulant treatments.
In conclusion, we reported good clinical outcomes of
saphenous vein interposition in the surgical treatment of
ruptured PAA, demonstrating that saphenous vein graft
interposition should be considered as the first-line surgical
treatment for these aneurysms.
Conflict of interest None declared.
References
1. Pulli R, Dorigo W, Troisi N, Innocenti AA, Pratesi G, Azas L,
et al. Surgical management of popliteal artery aneurysms: which
factors affect outcomes? J Vasc Surg. 2006;43(39):481–7.
2. Szilagyi DE, Schwartz RL, Reddy DJ. Popliteal arterial aneurysms.
Their natural history and management. Arch Surg. 1981;116:724–8.
3. Parmer SS, Skelly CL, Carpenter JP. Ruptured popliteal artery
aneurysm: a case report. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2006;40:71–4.
4. Illig KA, Eagleton MJ, Shortell CK, Quriel K, DeWeese JA,
Green RM. Ruptured popliteal artery aneurysm. J Vasc Surg.
1998;27:783–7.
5. Pratesi G, Marek J, Fargion A, Pulli R, Dorigo W, Pratesi C.
Endovascular repair of a ruptured popliteal artery aneurysm
associated with popliteal arteriovenous fistula. Eur J Vasc En-
dovasc Surg. 2010;40(5):645–8.
6. Rits Y, Erben Y, Ricotta JJ 2nd. Endovascular repair of ruptured
giant popliteal artery aneurysm. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc
Ther. 2009;2:190–4.
7. Dorigo W, Pulli R, Turini F, Pratesi G, Credi G, Innocenti AA,
et al. Acute leg ischaemia from thrombosed popliteal artery
aneurysms: role of preoperative thrombolysis. Eur J Vasc En-
dovasc Surg. 2002;23:251–4.
8. Agrafiotis AC, Horn D, Segers B, Lemaitre J, Bosschaerts T.
Ruptured aneurysm of the popliteal artery. Is the diagnosis still
difficult? Minerva Chir. 2012;67:355–60.
9. Pulli R, Dorigo W, Fargion A, Pratesi G, Innocent AA, Angiletta
D, et al. Comparison of early and midterm results of open and
endovascular treatment of popliteal artery aneurysms. Ann Vasc
Surg. 2012;26:809–18.
10. Trinidad-Hernendez M, Ricotta JJ 2nd, Gloviczki P, Kalra M,
Oderich GS, Duncan AA, et al. Results of elective and emergency
endovascular repairs of popliteal artery aneurysms. J Vasc Surg.
2013;57(5):1299–305.
11. Henry M, Amor M, Henry I, Klonaris C, Tzvetanoy K, Buniet
JM, et al. Percutaneous endovascular treatment of peripheral
aneurysms. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2000;41:871–83.
12. Van Sambeek MR, Gussenhoven EJ, van der Lugt A, Honkoop J, du
Bois NA, van Urk H. Endovascular stent-grafts for aneurysms of the
femoral and popliteal arteries. Ann Vasc Surg. 1999;13:247–53.
13. Mataracı I, Buyukbayrak F, Sasmazel A, Aksut M, Sarıkaya S,
Saclı H, et al. Early and late period results of the cases who
underwent surgical repair because of popliteal artery aneurysm.
Turkish J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;17:173–8.
14. Erdogan A, Irfan E, Turk T, Gurses U, Demircan A. Prostetik
vaskuler greft cinsleri ve uzun donem sonucları. Turk Gogus Kalp
Dama. 2002;10:37–41.
15. Huang Y, Gloviczki P, Noel AA, Sullivan TM, Kalra M, Gullerud RE,
et al. Early complications and long-term outcome after open surgical
treatment of popliteal artery aneurysm: Is exclusion with saphenous
vein bypass still the gold standard? J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:706–15.
16. Topel I, Betz T, Uhl C, Wiesner M, Brockner S, Steinbauer M. Use
of biosynthetic prosthesis (Omniflow II�) to replace infected in-
frainguinal prosthetic grafts-first results. Vasa. 2012;41(3):215–20.
17. Cihan HB, Gulcan O, Hazar A, Turkoz R. Peripheric vascular
injuries. Ulusal Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2001;7:113–6.
18. Takayama Y, Takagi A, Sato O, Miyata T, Kimura H, Sugawara
Y, et al. Use of a nondissection method in lower extremity
revascularization: a report on our 12-year experience of autoge-
nous vein bypass surgery. Surg Today. 1996;26(11):910–4.
19. Galland RB. History of the management of popliteal artery
aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;35:466–72.
20. Bowman JN, Ellozy SH, Ting J, Ghiassi S. Successful repair of
popliteal artery pseudoaneurysm after tibial lengthening osteot-
omy in a 7-year-old boy. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;42:610–4.
Surg Today
123