post-activation potentiation regarding baseball swing velocity

22
Manipulation of Postactivation Potentiation vs. the Use of a Weighted Bat Matt Salacienski Austen Hutton David Kimmich

Upload: austen-hutton

Post on 14-Jul-2015

474 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Manipulation of Postactivation Potentiation vs. the Use of a Weighted Bat

Matt SalacienskiAusten HuttonDavid Kimmich

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to whether or not the idea of postactivation potentiation can be utilized by collegiate baseball players prior to batting to

increase their swing velocity.

Background

It takes less than half a second for a 90 mph fastball to reach the home plate.

A faster swing = Competitive advantage for the hitter

Traditionally, hitters tend to use weighted “donuts”, or multiple bats to achieve this

Background

Montoya et al. conducted a study in which warming up with a weighted bat was shown to actually decrease swing velocity

“Kinetic Link Theory”

This refers to the transfer of momentum beginning in the lower body, up through hips and torso, and ending with the upper body.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtniXJk-mhE&feature=related

Postactivation Potentiation (PAP)

This suggests that maximal contraction of certain muscles prior to performing an explosive action can enhance overall power output during that action

Two theories exist as to why this occurs:

Increased phosphorylation of myosin light chains

Excitation of the Hoffman Reflex (H-Reflex)

Complex Training

Training protocol most commonly used in manipulating PAP

Combines heavy resistance exercises with plyometric exercises

Targets same muscle group to help transfer strength gains into power

Enhances nervous system involvement

Complex Training

Farup and Sorenson (2010)

1-RM bench press followed by a bench throw

Hrysmallis and Kidgell (2001)

5-RM bench press followed by explosive push-ups

Effect of Training Status

Chiu et al. (2003)

Heavy load squats followed by jump squats

Found that athletically-trained individuals are more apt to elicit PAP than are recreationally-active individuals

More resistant to fatigue

Methods

Interest: Effect of heavy resistance training prior to swing

10 DIII Collegiate Baseball Players Similar weight and stature (levers)

Only those who make plate appearances

This study will have been approved by the Institutional Review Board

All subjects have read and signed an informed consent

Methods Cont.

Acute Study

No training program implemented

Focus on muscle activation

Pre-Test

1RM for bench and squat

Needed for 1RM % during exercises

Methods Cont.

3 days of testing

Begin with dynamic warm-up (10 mins)

First 2 Days: Complex Training

Day 1: Bench paired with medicine ball power drops

3 sets of 3 reps at 80-90% 1RM (2 min rest)

After 3rd set, 1 min rest before power drops

3 min rest before taking 5 swings with normal weighted bat

Methods Cont.

Complex Training Cont.

Day 2: Squat paired with depth jumps

Load, volume, # of sets same as day 1

Depth Jumps: 36 inch box

Same rest periods

Day 3: Weighted Bat

5-8 swings with weighted bat/donut

Followed by velocity test

Technology

Technology

Detects X and Y velocity to give slope

Pick point on bat

Lower mph: v = rω

Higher radius = higher speed

Lower radius = lower speed

Statistics

Independent Variable

Mode of exercise/warm-up

○ Upper Body

○ Lower Body

○ Weighted Bat

Dependent Variable

Bat Swing Velocity

○ Comparing speed of swing after implementing 3 modes of warm-up

Statistical Analyses

Test

One-way ANOVA

○ 1 group

○ 3 means being compared

○ Shows difference between velocity means

Tukey Post-Hoc

○ Shows where difference is located

P-Value ≤ 0.05

Expected Results

May see a loss in velocity after weighted bat warm-up

Any increase in velocity: lower body exercises

Baseball focuses on lower body strength (anaerobic)

Data Collection

Subject 1 Subject2

Subject 3

Subject 4

Subject 5

Base 24.5 47.9 31.0 24.3 24.5

Weighted Bat

25.2 36.7 33.6 32.9 24.9

Lower-Body

35.2 67.7 31.5 58.5 36.4

Upper-Body

30.8 40.7 34.3 55.1 31.7

Data Collection

Data Collection

Significant at the 0.05 alpha level

Unfortunately, data collection produced error

Hand motion

Height

Level swing

Point analysis

N value was very low