EBM 3 ~ Spring 2012Poster and Podium Presentations

Poster Completion:Week 1: incorporation of faculty review

recommendations

Week 2: Poster figures, graphs, and text Final Poster version upload to the portal

Poster PresentationsWe’ll have your posters printed March 5th please review your printed posters

stored in the PD LabEBM Event March 8th evening

Mount and display postersInitiate discussion and Field questions

EBM Podium Presentation

Podium Presentation:15-20 minutes split between 2 speakers

SlidesReferencesthen questions

Schedule of assignments Week 3:

same or new partner? upload to the portal page one of rubric: self evaluation with PICO and partner at the

bottom

Week 4: look up references

Week 5: upload to the portal page two of rubric: self evaluation of some of your references, with

references listed at the bottom

Week 6: keep working on presentation, consider page three of the grading rubric

Week 7: upload draft presentation to portal (faculty review thereof determines EBM event speakers)

Week 8: practice speaking . . .

***Due Sunday March 4th Final version of podium presentation, uploaded.***

Graded by faculty/preceptors using:

EBM Project Evaluation Rubric

Self assessments using page 1 due week 3 ~ Topic evaluationPage 3 due week 5 ~ Reference evaluation

EBM Project Evaluation RubricRelevance to Preceptorship  4The topic is of interest to the medical community, relevant to the

preceptorship and the student will have the opportunity to see patients who exhibit the condition.

 3The topic is of interest to the medical community, relevant to the

preceptorship but the student my not have the opportunity to see patients who exhibit the condition.

 2The topic is of interest to the medical community but does not have

direct relevance to the preceptorship. 1The topic is not of general interest to the medical community, is

outdated and does not have relevance to preceptorship.

EBM Project Evaluation Rubric Patient(s) / Condition 4The patient(s) population represents a well defined set of those who have

the condition. 3The patient(s) population represents some of those who have the condition. 2The patient(s) population is broadly defined but not specific to the

condition . 1The patient(s) population is not clearly defined.

EBM Project Evaluation Rubric Intervention / Comparison 4The intervention /comparison is a new and promising treatment of the condition. 3The intervention / comparison is a needed review of current practice for the

treatment of the condition. 2The intervention /comparison is a new drug or treatment not showing significant

promise over existing practice(s). 1The intervention / comparison is outdated and is not relevant to existing

practice.

EBM Project Evaluation Rubric Outcome 4The outcome for the patient is clearly defined and measurable with a

clearly defined prognosis.  3The outcome for the patient is defined but not measurable. 2The outcome for the patient is incompletely defined, thus making it

difficult to measure. 1The outcome for the patient is not defined.

Reference Self Evaluation Week 5Quality of the referencesMethodologyOutcomes

***Due Sunday March 4th Final version of podium presentation, uploaded.***

Summatives Week- EBM Podium Presentation talks throughout the week,

schedule TBD.

EBM Event: Thursday March 8th 6:30pm-9pm at Durrwachter Alumni Conference

CenterInvitations to all of LHU!Guests encouragedProfessional attireSchedule:

6:30-7: poster reception7-8:15: Three podium talks8:15-9: Poster Session

Light catering

EBM 3 Grade:Semester Participation Poster Podium Talk Professionalism

Spring 20% 10% 60% 10%

Other things to considerPress Release to hometownsCopy of presentations to keep

Good Luck and Have Fun!