poster syllables
TRANSCRIPT
8/3/2019 Poster Syllables
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/poster-syllables 1/2
• Incorporating pronunciation variations of the schwa in the
standard transcriptions of sentences (using EBNF notation).
• Performing a phonetic recognition test using acoustic models
of phones (trained with and without linguistic knowledge of
the schwa deletion/alternation).
Investigating New Syllable Prototypes
for the Portuguese LanguageSara Candeias1, Fernando Perdigão1,2
Examples of schwa pronunciation variation.The vertical slash | is used to signify phone alternation probability, between round brackets.mea
• Schwa contexts:
- word-beginning (T1);
- word-ending (T2);
- opened syllable (T3);
- closed syllable (T4).
1Institute of Telecommunications – Pole of Coimbra (PORTUGAL) 2 Dep. of Electrical & Computer Eng. – University of Coimbra (PORTUGAL)
{saracandeias, fp}@co.it.pt
The database is composed by 401,345 Portuguese words
• from Natura Project’s corpora;
• without acronyms, foreign-words, abbreviations;
• with syllables divided automatically:
• using the Natura Project tool Lingua::PT::PLN module);
• changing some syllable prototypes, according to new
syllabification rules.
Conclusions:
• [@], [] and [i] are variants (allophones);
• [] between two consonants allows new types of consonant
new syllable patterns;
• Schwa is not subjected to any rule which systematically rende
[i] obligatory.
• Syllable structures for Portuguese,
deriving from various acoustic-
phonetic restrictions of Portuguesespeech.
(MULTI)REALIZATION OF THE SCHWA
[@] Schwa presence
[] Schwa deletion
[i] Schwa alternation c
What is this study about? • To describe statistically the syllable structure pro
Portuguese (complementing the existing approaches).
• To present the syllabification architecture closer to ac
(based on acoustic-phonetic properties).
• To guide development of complementary models processing in speech applications.
What are the purposes of this study?
How do we do that?
Example of phone alignment between transcriptions
with (+ SPINF) and without (- SPINF) schwa multi-pronunciation information.
• Analysing the output utterances to point out the oc
schwa presence vs. schwa deletion and alternation wphone (comparative method).
Aligned transcription
- SPINF SIL R @ f u r m a d u sp d @ sp u m 6 sp k o~ p 6 J i 6 sp d @ sp p @ t r O l i u S SIL
+ SPINF SIL R f u r m a d u d u m 6 sp k o~ p 6 J i 6 d @ sp p t r O l i u S SIL
Schwa
pronunciation
variation
Phonetic forms Orthographic fo
(@|)
m u L E r (@|) S mulheres (wom
d (@|)
k o~ b a t (@|) S
f (@|) r O z (@|) S
de combates fe
fierce fight )
(@|i|) (@|i|) S t i m u l a r estimular (to in
What are evaluated?
How is it evaluated?
• The influence on the schwa realization from the:
- stress position; - number of word phones; - schwa position in the word.
What are the results?
2469
22535
6116
13897
963
21422
6186
12837
553
39
0
923
1
2
3
4
Occurrences
C o n t e x t T y p e s
Schwa Deletion
Schwa Retencion
Schwa Substitution
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
V a l u e s
Delections (%)vs schwapositioninword
-1 1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
V a l u e s
Delections (%
• Proportion between
the schwa realizations
for a single context
type.
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 1 2 13 1 4 15 1 6 17 1 8
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
V a l u e s
Delections (%) vs NumberofPhones
Contexts of Schwa Examples
Types left @ Right
T1 SIL @ <*>
@Sforsu
@StaZiu
@Stadu
T2 <*> @ SIL
sEri@
ko~tinu@
tutalme~t@
T3 <*> @ <C.>| <CC.>
imigr6~t@S
d@Zvi6~dus@
sup@rStis6~w~
T4 <.C> @ <.C>|<.V>
m@LOr
R@kuJ@sime~tu
R@S@ad6
• Neighbours of the schwa (left-to-right).
• Schwa deletion
could be
influenced by:
- the presence of the
fricative, nasal and
lateral features;
- the number of word-phones;
- the schwa position
into the word.
• Schwa presence and deletion are almost with the same p
• There are no significant - the relation between the schwa deletion phenomen
syllable stress position.
8/3/2019 Poster Syllables
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/poster-syllables 2/2
Investigating New Syllable Prototypes
for the Portuguese LanguageSara Candeias1, Fernando Perdigão1,2
1Institute of Telecommunications – Pole of Coimbra (PORTUGAL), 2Dep. of Electrical & Computer Eng. – University of Coimbra (PORTUGAL)
{saracandeias, fp}@co.it.pt
• Syllable structures for Portuguese (PS)
based on acoustic-phonetic restrictions of speech.
What is this study about?
• To describe statistically the PS prototypes (complemexisting approaches).
• To present the PS architecture closer to actual speech (deacoustic-phonetic properties).
• To guide development of complementary models for PSin speech applications (PS is an intermediary level betwand phones to explore).
What are the purposes of this study?
• Focusing on the PS structures (in 401,345 words);
• Splitting syllables automatically (tool: LINGUA::PT::PLN module);
How did we do that?
CANONICAL PS STRUCTURE
PORTUGUESE GRAMMAR
RHYME has a mandatory
nucleus (V)
ONSET and CODA are optional
(Csimple, Ccluster )
syllable: <graus> (degrees)
onset: <gr > rhyme: <aus>
nucleus: <a> coda: <us>
<r eunir > (to meet)<gasól eo> (diesel oil)<biunívoco> (biunivocal)
<r eu | nir ><ga | ó | l eo><biu | ní | vo | co>
• Keeping the sequential Vssince they were consideredgrowing diphthongs.
<r e | u | nir > : <r e>(again) + <unir >unite) <bi | u | ní | vo | co>: <bi >(t<unívo | co>
• Taking into account atendency to make locasyllable boundaries cowith potential morphe
• Applying some new splitting rules to the canonical PS str
• Mapping all sequential C/V syllable patterns and relating
structuring.
Examples of canonical PS splitting: Examples of alternative PS splitti
<adv ertir > (to warn)<obt er> (to obtain)
<o pç ão> (option)
<ad | v er | tir ><ob | t er ><o p | ç ão>
• Having the syllable boundarybetween the V and the C plosive.
<a | dv er | tir ><o | bt er ><o | pç ão>
• Linking a C sequence in oput plosives always in anlocation.
DATABASE
• 401,345 Portuguese words• from Natura Project’s corpora;
• without acronyms, foreign-words, abbreviations;
• with syllables divided automatically:
• using the Natura Project tool Lingua::PT::PLN m
• changing some syllable prototypes, according t
syllabification rules.
What conclusions we have?
What were the results?