potential problems with ethylene-vinyl acetate for ... problems with ethylene-vinyl acetate ... (pv)...

1
G' (Pa) POTENTIAL PROBLEMS WITH ETHYLENE-VINYL ACETATE FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC PACKAGING Michael D. Kempe 1 , Gary J. Jorgensen 1 , Kent M. Terwilliger 1 , Tom J. McMahon 1 , Cheryl E. Kennedy 1 , and Theodore T. Borek 2 1 National Renewable Energy Laboratory • Golden, CO 80401; 2 Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87123 Abstract Materials and Methods EVA Decomposes to Produce Acetic Acid Photovoltaic (PV) devices are typically encapsulated using (1) EVA was obtained from a commercial source and was well ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) to provide mechanical support, formulated for use in photovoltaic applications. 1 (2) EVA acetic acid formation was evaluated by collecting the effused gases from the thermal decomposition of EVA using a heating apparatus and an ion chromatograph (IC) vial that contained a weighed amount of 4.8-mM KOH. This collection solution was tested using IC analysis to determine the acetic acid formation rate. Acid Formation Rate (ng/min/g) 100 10 electrical isolation, optical coupling, and protection against environmental exposure. Under exposure to atmospheric water and/or ultraviolet radiation, EVA will decompose to produce acetic acid, lowering the pH and increasing the surface corrosion rates of embedded devices. Even though acetic acid is produced at a very slow rate it may not take much to catalyze reactions that lead to rapid module deterioration. Another consideration is that the glass transition of EVA, as measured (3) Aluminum mirrors were produced in the sputtering chamber of using dynamic mechanical analysis, begins at temperatures of a Pernicka multichamber vacuum deposition system. The final about -15ºC. Temperatures lower than this can be reached for Al thickness was approximately 800±25 Å. extended periods of time in some climates. Due to increased moduli below the glass transition temperature, a module may be more vulnerable to damage if a mechanical load is applied by snow or wind at low temperatures. Modules using EVA should not be rated for use at such low temperatures without additional low-temperature mechanical testing beyond the scope of UL 1703. EVA Produces Acidic Environments in Non-Breathable Packaging Acetic acid has a pKa of 4.76 so it will tend to buffer solutions to pH~4.76 corresponding to a hydronium ion concentration of 1.74×10 -5 mol/L. As an order of magnitude estimate of the time necessary to reach pH~4.76, we extrapolate down to 27ºC where EVA will produce 3.31×10 -12 g Acid /g EVA /min and assume that the ratio of acetic acid to water in the polymer is the same as would be found for a solution in equilibrium with the polymer. This assumption provides a relationship between the chemical potential of the acetic acid in the polymer as compared to an aqueous solution. At 27ºC EVA has at most 0.00223 g H 2 O /g EVA [1], and at pH~4.76 there will be equal amounts of acetic acid and acetate ions (or 2.136×10 -6 g Acid /g H 2 O ). Under these conditions it will take about 1 day to approach a chemical potential for acetic acid roughly equivalent to pH=4.76. A module constructed using EVA will quickly equilibrate to a pH less than 4.76 (probably around 2 to 3) if it has an impermeable back-sheet, and to a pH between 4.76 and 7.0 if it has a breathable back-sheet. [1] M. D. Kempe, Modeling of rates of Moisture Ingress Into Photovoltaic Modules, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, Accepted 00 (2006) 000-000 Alternative Encapsulants Reduce Rather than Accelerate Corrosion Al only (A) Al / EVA Al / DC700 (B) Al only Figure 4. Aluminum mirror laminated with (A) EVA (B) DC 700 acetic acid cure silicone after 1000 hours of 85°C and 85% RH exposure with a soda-lime glass back-sheet having polymer located only in the center and the outer ~25mm. Thermally Deduced T g is Significantly Lower than the Mechanical T g (4) Dynamic mechanical analysis was performed on a TA Instruments Ares Rheometer using a rectangular torsional testing fixture. (5) A TA Instruments DSC Q1000 was used for differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Aluminum Mirrors Oxidize When Acetic Acid is Trapped (A) (B) Figure 2. Aluminum mirror laminated with EVA and a glass back-sheet after 1003 hours of 85°C with (A) 85% RH exposure and (B) 100% RH exposure. Exposure to Acidic Solutions Quantifies Acetic Acid Exposure (A) (B) Figure 5. (A) Aluminum mirror laminated using EVA without a back-sheet. The sample on the left was placed on top of a jar (mirror/EVA side down) with a saturated salt solution. The sample jar on the right contained 20% acetic acid. (B) Backlit photo of an aluminum mirror after 1024 hrs at 85ºC exposure on top of a jar containing a saturated KCl with 1% acetic acid (pH ~ 3). At 85ºC this produced a vapor at approximately 79% RH. Low Temperature Mechanical Testing of Modules is Needed 1 E+9 10 9 90 0.0024 0.00245 0.0025 0.00255 0.0026 0.00265 0.0027 1/Temperature (1/K) Figure 1. Nanograms Acetate per minute per gram EVA. Acetate was also detected at 80°C (1/K=0.00283) but was not quantified. This test was performed using a humidified N 2 carrier gas. Breathable Back-Sheet Allows Acetic Acid to Escape (A) (B) Figure 3. EVA on an Al mirror without a back-sheet, (A) 1003 h at 85ºC/85% RH and (B) 357 h at 85ºC/100% RH. Acetic acid escape is beneficial, but saturated water is very detrimental. A Low pH is Required to Oxidize the Aluminum Mirrors The pH was estimated using BAKER-pHIX pH indicator strips. At 1%, 4%, and 7% acetic acid a pH of approximately 3, 2.5, and 2.5 was obtained. For higher concentrations, the pH was at least 2 or lower. The control solutions (no acetic acid) did not oxidize significantly and had an appearance similar to Fig. 3a after 1024 hrs. Solutions containing 10%, 15% and 20% acetic acid experienced severe corrosion after about a 1 day exposure at 85ºC (e.g. Fig. 5a Right Side). At 4% and 7%, 200 to 300 hours were necessary to produce severe corrosion. Finally, the 1% solution experienced a small but significant amount of oxidation after 1024 hrs exposure at 85ºC (Fig. 5b). The amount of corrosion seen at 1% is similar to that experienced at the perimeter of the samples with impermeable glass back-sheets (e.g. Fig. 2a). Therefore, as a first order approximation, the 10.2 cm square samples with glass back-sheets can trap enough acetic acid at 85ºC to produce an acid environment with a chemical potential approximately equal to a solution at pH~3. These findings are consistent with the fact that Al oxides become highly soluble in water at pH~2.4 and are only slightly soluble at pH~4 [2]. This analysis demonstrates the large potential for EVA to produce a corrosive environment in a sealed package where acetic acid can not escape. More experimentation is necessary to determine the specific relevance to PV devices. [2] T. E. Graedel, Corrosion Mechanisms for Aluminum Exposed to the Atmosphere, J. Electrochem. Soc., 136(4) (1989) 204-212. Conclusions 100 rad/s (1) During exposure to water and/or UV radiation EVA will decompose to produce acetic acid, thereby lowering the pH and generally increasing surface corrosion rates. Heat Capacity (mJ / o C) 80 EVA DSC data 10 rad/s 1 E+8 10 8 G' Phase Angle (deg) 70 1 rad/s 60 0.1 rad/s 1 E+7 10 7 50 T g Cooling -23 o C -19 o C -15 o C 40 (2) Thin film PV technologies are more likely to be -33.1 o C -27 o C 10 6 1 E+6 sensitive to acetic acid induced corrosion than are crystalline wafer based technologies. 30 1 E+5 10 5 δ 20 10 T g Heating -36.8 o C 1 E+4 10 4 (3) EVA goes through a T g beginning at about -15°C, 0 making its use at lower temperatures a significant -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 -90 -70 -50 -30 -10 10 30 50 70 90 Temperature ( o C) concern. Temperature ( o C) Figure 7. Dynamic mechanical analysis of cured EVA. The moduli increased by a Figure 6. Heat capacity of cured EVA measured by DSC at a heating/cooling rate factor of about 500 because of the presence of both a melting point and a glass (4) Without low temperature mechanical testing, a of 10ºC/min. This is the usual method for determining the glass transition transition. For many environments, a temperature of –15°C is often reached, temperature rating of –15°C may be appropriate for temperature (T ) even though mechanical methods are more relevant. making cells in EVA-based modules significantly more susceptible to breakage modules constructed using EVA. g from sudden impacts and rapid flexing. The information contained in this poster is subject to a government license. 2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion • Waikoloa, Hawaii • May 7-12, 2006 • NREL/PO-520-39977 0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Upload: nguyenhuong

Post on 18-May-2018

245 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

G (

Pa)

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS WITH ETHYLENE-VINYL ACETATE FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC PACKAGING

Michael D Kempe1 Gary J Jorgensen1 Kent M Terwilliger1 Tom J McMahon1Cheryl E Kennedy1 and Theodore T Borek2

1 National Renewable Energy Laboratory bull Golden CO 80401 2 Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque NM 87123

Abstract Materials and Methods EVA Decomposes to Produce Acetic AcidPhotovoltaic (PV) devices are typically encapsulated using (1) EVA was obtained from a commercial source and was well

ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) to provide mechanical support formulated for use in photovoltaic applications

1

(2) EVA acetic acid formation was evaluated by collecting the effused gases from the thermal decomposition of EVA using a heating apparatus and an ion chromatograph (IC) vial that contained a weighed amount of 48-mM KOH This collection solution was tested using IC analysis to determine the acetic acid formation rate

Aci

d Fo

rmat

ion

Rat

e(n

gm

ing

)

100

10

electrical isolation optical coupling and protection against environmental exposure Under exposure to atmospheric water andor ultraviolet radiation EVA will decompose to produce acetic acid lowering the pH and increasing the surface corrosion rates of embedded devices Even though acetic acid is produced at a very slow rate it may not take much to catalyze reactions that lead to rapid module deterioration Another consideration is that the glass transition of EVA as measured (3) Aluminum mirrors were produced in the sputtering chamber of using dynamic mechanical analysis begins at temperatures of a Pernicka multichamber vacuum deposition system The final about -15ordmC Temperatures lower than this can be reached for Al thickness was approximately 800plusmn25 Aring

extended periods of time in some climates Due to increased moduli below the glass transition temperature a module may be more vulnerable to damage if a mechanical load is applied by snow or wind at low temperatures Modules using EVA should not be rated for use at such low temperatures without additional low-temperature mechanical testing beyond the scope of UL 1703

EVA Produces Acidic Environments in Non-Breathable Packaging

Acetic acid has a pKa of 476 so it will tend to buffer solutions to pH~476 corresponding to a hydronium ion concentration of 174times10-5

molL As an order of magnitude estimate of the time necessary to reach pH~476 we extrapolate down to 27ordmC where EVA will produce 331times10-12 gAcidgEVAmin and assume that the ratio of acetic acid to water in the polymer is the same as would be found for a solution in equilibrium with the polymer This assumption provides a relationship between the chemical potential of the acetic acid in the polymer as compared to an aqueous solution At 27ordmC EVA has at most 000223 gH2OgEVA [1] and at pH~476 there will be equal amounts of acetic acid and acetate ions (or 2136times10-6 gAcidgH2O) Under these conditions it will take about 1 day to approach a chemical potential for acetic acid roughly equivalent to pH=476

A module constructed using EVA will quickly equilibrate to a pH less than 476 (probably around 2 to 3) if it has an impermeable back-sheet and to a pH between 476 and 70 if it has a breathable back-sheet [1] M D Kempe Modeling of rates of Moisture Ingress Into Photovoltaic Modules Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells Accepted 00 (2006) 000-000

Alternative Encapsulants Reduce Rather than Accelerate Corrosion

Al only

(A)

Al EVA

Al DC700 (B)

Al only

Figure 4 Aluminum mirror laminated with (A) EVA (B) DC 700 acetic acid cure silicone after 1000 hours of 85degC and 85 RH exposure with a soda-lime glass back-sheet having polymer located only in the center and the outer ~25mm

Thermally Deduced Tg is Significantly Lower than the Mechanical Tg

(4) Dynamic mechanical analysis was performed on a TA Instruments Ares Rheometer using a rectangular torsional testing fixture

(5) A TA Instruments DSC Q1000 was used for differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)

Aluminum Mirrors Oxidize When Acetic Acid is Trapped

(A)

(B)

Figure 2 Aluminum mirror laminated with EVA and a glass back-sheet after 1003 hours of 85degC with (A) 85 RH exposure and (B) 100 RH exposure

Exposure to Acidic Solutions Quantifies Acetic Acid Exposure

(A) (B)

Figure 5 (A) Aluminum mirror laminated using EVA without a back-sheet The sample on the left was placed on top of a jar (mirrorEVA side down) with a saturated salt solution The sample jar on the right contained 20 acetic acid (B) Backlit photo of an aluminum mirror after 1024 hrs at 85ordmC exposure on top of a jar containing a saturated KCl with 1 acetic acid (pH ~ 3) At 85ordmC this produced a vapor at approximately 79 RH

Low Temperature Mechanical Testing of Modules is Needed

1 E+9109 90

00024 000245 00025 000255 00026 000265 00027

1Temperature (1K)

Figure 1 Nanograms Acetate per minute per gram EVA Acetate was also detected at 80degC (1K=000283) but was not quantified This test was performed using a humidified N2 carrier gas

Breathable Back-Sheet Allows Acetic Acid to Escape

(A)

(B)

Figure 3 EVA on an Al mirror without a back-sheet (A) 1003 h at 85ordmC85 RH and (B) 357 h at 85ordmC100 RH Acetic acid escape is beneficial but saturated water is very detrimental

A Low pH is Required to Oxidize the Aluminum Mirrors

The pH was estimated using BAKER-pHIX pH indicator strips At 1 4 and 7 acetic acid a pH of approximately 3 25 and 25 was obtained For higher concentrations the pH was at least 2 or lower The control solutions (no acetic acid) did not oxidize significantly and had an appearance similar to Fig 3a after 1024 hrs Solutions containing 10 15 and 20 acetic acid experienced severe corrosion after about a 1 day exposure at 85ordmC (eg Fig 5a Right Side) At 4 and 7 200 to 300 hours were necessary to produce severe corrosion Finally the 1 solution experienced a small but significant amount of oxidation after 1024 hrs exposure at 85ordmC (Fig 5b) The amount of corrosion seen at 1 is similar to that experienced at the perimeter of the samples with impermeable glass back-sheets (eg Fig 2a) Therefore as a first order approximation the 102 cm square samples with glass back-sheets can trap enough acetic acid at 85ordmC to produce an acid environment with a chemical potential approximately equal to a solution at pH~3

These findings are consistent with the fact that Al oxides become highly soluble in water at pH~24 and are only slightly soluble at pH~4 [2] This analysis demonstrates the large potential for EVA to produce a corrosive environment in a sealed package where acetic acid can not escape More experimentation is necessary to determine the specific relevance to PV devices [2] T E Graedel Corrosion Mechanisms for Aluminum Exposed to the Atmosphere J Electrochem Soc 136(4) (1989) 204-212

Conclusions

100 rads (1) During exposure to water andor UV radiation EVA will decompose to produce acetic acid thereby lowering the pH and generally increasing surface corrosion rates

Hea

t Cap

acity

(mJ

o C) 80EVA DSC data 10 rads1 E+8108 G

Phas

e A

ngle

(deg

)

701 rads6001 rads

1 E+7107

50Tg Cooling -23oC -19oC -15oC 40 (2) Thin film PV technologies are more likely to be-331 oC -27oC1061 E+6

sensitive to acetic acid induced corrosion than are crystalline wafer based technologies

30

1 E+5105 δ 20

10Tg Heating -368 oC

1 E+4104 (3) EVA goes through a Tg beginning at about -15degC0

making its use at lower temperatures a significant -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80

-90 -70 -50 -30 -10 10 30 50 70 90 Temperature (oC) concernTemperature (oC) Figure 7 Dynamic mechanical analysis of cured EVA The moduli increased by a

Figure 6 Heat capacity of cured EVA measured by DSC at a heatingcooling rate factor of about 500 because of the presence of both a melting point and a glass (4) Without low temperature mechanical testing a of 10ordmCmin This is the usual method for determining the glass transition transition For many environments a temperature of ndash15degC is often reached temperature rating of ndash15degC may be appropriate fortemperature (T ) even though mechanical methods are more relevant making cells in EVA-based modules significantly more susceptible to breakage modules constructed using EVAg

from sudden impacts and rapid flexing

The information contained in this poster is subject to a government license2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion bull Waikoloa Hawaii bull May 7-12 2006 bull NRELPO-520-39977

0

10

20

30

40

50

60