power point rocia fani kaban
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 Power Point Rocia Fani Kaban
1/18
By : Rocia Fani KabanNPM : 0902050371
-
7/28/2019 Power Point Rocia Fani Kaban
2/18
Based on experience through Teaching
Training Program (PPL) Students havemuch memory about grammar and
vocabulary but have less confidence inspeaking because they are lack ofpracticing speaking
Students are ashamed to speak becausethey are afraid that sentences are usedincorrectly and their friends laughed ontheir speaking
-
7/28/2019 Power Point Rocia Fani Kaban
3/18
The effect of applying communicativeactivities on the students speaking ability
The students speaking ability tought byapplying communicative activities
C . The Scope and LimititationIn this research, the writer just focuses on
pair work activity because there are manybenefits that students will get by doing pair
work activities, such as: more communicationwill take place; motivation can be high, buildstudents confidence, and develop other skills.
-
7/28/2019 Power Point Rocia Fani Kaban
4/18
Based on the background of the study, theproblem is formulated as follows: DoesCommunicative Activities significantly
affect on students speaking ability?E. The Objective of The Study
The objective of the study is toinvestigate the significant effect of applyingcommunicative activities on studentsspeaking ability.
-
7/28/2019 Power Point Rocia Fani Kaban
5/18
Increasing the students confidence in
using English, especially in speaking abilityEnriching the teach creativity in applying
the various techniques in the order to
make the class room atmosphere lively
and interesting.
-
7/28/2019 Power Point Rocia Fani Kaban
6/18
This research will be conducted at SMPSwasta Galih Agung Pesantren Darul
Arafah Raya.The location of research is atJl. Lau Bakeri Deli Serdang, Medan Tj.Sari. This research will carry out theseventh year sudents 2013/2014. This
students are choosen because otherresearcher has never been conducted yetin this school and also the location in termfund and time is accessible one.
-
7/28/2019 Power Point Rocia Fani Kaban
7/18
The population of this research will be
taken from the 2012/ 2013 seventh year
students of SMP which is consisted of 34
students in 2 parallel classes. The number
of population is shown in tableTable I
Class Population Sample
V II - 1 34 34
V II - II 34 34
Total 68 68
-
7/28/2019 Power Point Rocia Fani Kaban
8/18
Based on the total population, the populationwill be regarded as the sample. It is based on
the statements of Arikunto ( 2006 : 134 )states just for the assumption, so if thesubjects are less than 100, it is better to takeall the subject so the researcher is called
population research . Then, if the number ofsubjects are greater, it can take the rangefrom 10 % - 15% or 20 % - 25% or more.Based on the quotation, the researcher will
take all the students or it will be equal 100 %from the whole population.
-
7/28/2019 Power Point Rocia Fani Kaban
9/18
Table II
Population and Sample
Class Population Sample
Experimental 34 34
Control 34 34
Total 68 68
-
7/28/2019 Power Point Rocia Fani Kaban
10/18
This study will be conducted by using anexperimental design with two groups. Theywill be experimental and control groups.
Experimental group will be the group thatreceives treatment by usingcommunicative activities, while the controlgroup will be the group that receivestreatment by without using communicativeactivities. The design of research can bedrawn as follow:
-
7/28/2019 Power Point Rocia Fani Kaban
11/18
Group Test Teaching Test
Experimental Pre - Test Using
communicativeactivities
Post - Test
Control Pre - Test Without using
communicativies
activities
Post - Test
-
7/28/2019 Power Point Rocia Fani Kaban
12/18
This study will use test as the instrument to collect datain which the teacher makes interview test. Theresearcher will ask the students to pick a paper from abox that consisted of ten diffrent names and then the
students are interviewed individually. This test is givenin order to know students vocabulary, structure,fluency, and pronunciation. For this study, pre-test anpost-test are given to both experimental and controlgroup.
In scoring the students answer, the researcherwilluse a clarks FSI (Foreign Services Institute) Weightingin Lubis (1988: 89) that gives the heaviest emphasis tostructure, secondary emphasis to vocabulary, and leastemphasis to pronunciation. Each criteria score isdescribed below:
-
7/28/2019 Power Point Rocia Fani Kaban
13/18
Proficient
Description
1 2 3 4
Structure 9 18 27 36
Vocabulary 7 14 21 28
Fluency 6 12 18 24
Pronunciation 3 6 9 12
-
7/28/2019 Power Point Rocia Fani Kaban
14/18
In teaching presentation,the sample isdivided into two groups. First group isexperimental group which is taught byusing communicative activities (pair work).Second group is control group which istaught without using communicative
activities.Pre testPost test
-
7/28/2019 Power Point Rocia Fani Kaban
15/18
Best and Khan (2002: 208) define that thequality of the data gathering instrument orprocedure that enables it measure what itis intended to measure.
This research will construct validity whichis concerned with the extent to which a testwill be measured specific trait or construct.
The term construct is used to refer tosomething that is not itself directlymeasurable but which explainedobservable effects.
-
7/28/2019 Power Point Rocia Fani Kaban
16/18
Reliability refers to the consistency of the
measurement. Arikunto (1988: 170) states
that a test can be measured more than one
and its result is stabile, it is reliability. This
study will use inter-rater reliability to gain theresult by calculating the real score from the
first rater and the second rater. The interview
is recorded, transcribed and assesed by the
two different raters.
To get the reliability of the test, the writer will
use Spearman Brown formula as follows:
-
7/28/2019 Power Point Rocia Fani Kaban
17/18
Where: N : The number of students
X : The total score of rater I Y : The total score of rater II According to Aruan (2007) asserts that
reliability of the test can be categorized as follows: 0,0- 0,20 The reliability is very low
0,21- 0,40 The reliability is low 0,41- 0,006 The reliability is fair 0,61- 0,80 The reliability is high 0,81- above The reliability is very high.
-
7/28/2019 Power Point Rocia Fani Kaban
18/18
Where :Mx :The mean score of experimental groupMy : The mean score of control group dx2 : The standard deviation of experimental group dy2 :The standard deviation of control group Nx :The total number samples of experimental
group Ny :The total number samples of control group