power trio of rules or why members and parliamentarians collide 38 th nap biennial conference st....

16
Power Trio of Rules or Why Members and Parliamentarians Collide 38 th NAP Biennial Conference St. Petersburg, FL September 24, 2011 Lorenzo R. Cuesta Professional Registered Parliamentarian http://www.roberts-rules.com

Upload: sibyl-hampton

Post on 21-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Power Trio of Rules or Why Members and Parliamentarians Collide 38 th NAP Biennial Conference St. Petersburg, FL September 24, 2011 Lorenzo R. Cuesta Professional

Power Trio of Rulesor Why Members and Parliamentarians

Collide

38th NAP Biennial Conference

St. Petersburg, FL September 24, 2011

Lorenzo R. Cuesta

Professional Registered Parliamentarian

http://www.roberts-rules.com

Page 2: Power Trio of Rules or Why Members and Parliamentarians Collide 38 th NAP Biennial Conference St. Petersburg, FL September 24, 2011 Lorenzo R. Cuesta Professional

September 24, 2011 LRCuesta, PRP 2

The Parliamentary Authority

Page 3: Power Trio of Rules or Why Members and Parliamentarians Collide 38 th NAP Biennial Conference St. Petersburg, FL September 24, 2011 Lorenzo R. Cuesta Professional

September 24, 2011 LRCuesta, PRP 3

The Member vs. the Parliamentarian

1. A member attends meetings of different associations and sees only inconsistencies in the handling of rules.

2. A member consults several parliamentarians on a specific issue and receives several different answers.

3. A member takes a class in Parliamentary Procedure but nothing in the class appears to relate to his association.

4. NAP units cannot recruit members because the subject is too overwhelming, too undecipherable, too remote.

The Members and the Parliamentarian Collidewith a Power Trio of Rules

Page 4: Power Trio of Rules or Why Members and Parliamentarians Collide 38 th NAP Biennial Conference St. Petersburg, FL September 24, 2011 Lorenzo R. Cuesta Professional

September 24, 2011 LRCuesta, PRP 4

1. The Members’ Rights

Page 5: Power Trio of Rules or Why Members and Parliamentarians Collide 38 th NAP Biennial Conference St. Petersburg, FL September 24, 2011 Lorenzo R. Cuesta Professional

September 24, 2011 LRCuesta, PRP 5

1. Fundamental Principles ofParliamentary Law (p. 263)

• One question at a time• Only members can vote• Must be present to vote• No cumulative voting• Presence of a quorum• Previous notice• Election by ballot• Cannot dispense with

order of business• Vote only in legal meeting

• Committee chair must not preside during own report

• Cannot postpone beyond next session

• Cannot deny a member the right – To attend meetings– To make and amend

motions– To speak in debate– To vote– To nominate

Page 6: Power Trio of Rules or Why Members and Parliamentarians Collide 38 th NAP Biennial Conference St. Petersburg, FL September 24, 2011 Lorenzo R. Cuesta Professional

September 24, 2011 LRCuesta, PRP 6

2. The Association’s Rules

Page 7: Power Trio of Rules or Why Members and Parliamentarians Collide 38 th NAP Biennial Conference St. Petersburg, FL September 24, 2011 Lorenzo R. Cuesta Professional

September 24, 2011 LRCuesta, PRP 7

2. The Association’s Rules (Bylaws)

A. Bylaws define the business of the association, and often contradict Robert’s Rules of Order, for example

a. An association has 3 kinds of members;Member type A has no power to vote

b. Members may attend board of director’s meeting;Member, not a member of the board, may move a new motion

c. New Business must be submitted 30 days before the meeting;New Business not allowed if it misses the deadline

d. The president may vote in case of a tie;The president may not vote by ballot or to cause a tie

Page 8: Power Trio of Rules or Why Members and Parliamentarians Collide 38 th NAP Biennial Conference St. Petersburg, FL September 24, 2011 Lorenzo R. Cuesta Professional

September 24, 2011 LRCuesta, PRP 8

2. The Association’s Rules (Bylaws)

B. Whereas, a Fundamental Principle of Parliamentary Law may not be suspended, it is acceptable for the association’s bylaws to violate it.

C. Additionally, bylaws may not be suspended except under 2 conditionsa. If they allow for their own suspension, or

b. If they are in the nature of a rule of order.

Page 9: Power Trio of Rules or Why Members and Parliamentarians Collide 38 th NAP Biennial Conference St. Petersburg, FL September 24, 2011 Lorenzo R. Cuesta Professional

September 24, 2011 LRCuesta, PRP 9

3. In the Nature of

Page 10: Power Trio of Rules or Why Members and Parliamentarians Collide 38 th NAP Biennial Conference St. Petersburg, FL September 24, 2011 Lorenzo R. Cuesta Professional

September 24, 2011 LRCuesta, PRP 10

3. Bylaws in the Nature of a Rule of Order

• Amend• Discharge committee• Create a committee• Appeal• Debate (duration or

frequency)• Point of order• Recognition• Rescind

• Order of business• Voting requirements• Consider informally• Consider by seriatim• Read papers• Reconsider vote• Withdraw a motion• Division of a question

(p. 17: line 22-25)

Page 11: Power Trio of Rules or Why Members and Parliamentarians Collide 38 th NAP Biennial Conference St. Petersburg, FL September 24, 2011 Lorenzo R. Cuesta Professional

September 24, 2011 LRCuesta, PRP 11

Members are Confusedby the Parliamentarian

Page 12: Power Trio of Rules or Why Members and Parliamentarians Collide 38 th NAP Biennial Conference St. Petersburg, FL September 24, 2011 Lorenzo R. Cuesta Professional

What’s a Parliamentarian’s Solution?

• How do we stop driving them crazy, and make it about them?

• How do we teach an association’s members, or our own potential members, about this Power Trio of Rules, and prove that Parliamentary Procedure is…– Consistent?– Manageable?– Relevant?– All about them?

September 24, 2011 LRCuesta, PRP 12

Page 13: Power Trio of Rules or Why Members and Parliamentarians Collide 38 th NAP Biennial Conference St. Petersburg, FL September 24, 2011 Lorenzo R. Cuesta Professional

Common Teaching Approach

September 24, 2011 LRCuesta, PRP 13

Page 14: Power Trio of Rules or Why Members and Parliamentarians Collide 38 th NAP Biennial Conference St. Petersburg, FL September 24, 2011 Lorenzo R. Cuesta Professional

Common Teaching Approaches

September 24, 2011 LRCuesta, PRP 14

Page 15: Power Trio of Rules or Why Members and Parliamentarians Collide 38 th NAP Biennial Conference St. Petersburg, FL September 24, 2011 Lorenzo R. Cuesta Professional

September 24, 2011 LRCuesta, PRP 15

An Improved Approach

• A lesson 1. Customized to the listener’s organization, and

2. Specifically incorporates the confusing trio of powers.

• Such as:1. An Interactive script based on the ranking of motions that

allows for questions and discussion, Script A , or

2. A lesson based on 1/3 lecture with a handout, and 2/3 interactive drill and discussion, Script B.

Page 16: Power Trio of Rules or Why Members and Parliamentarians Collide 38 th NAP Biennial Conference St. Petersburg, FL September 24, 2011 Lorenzo R. Cuesta Professional

In Summary

September 24, 2011 LRCuesta, PRP 16

The client that hires us, and the potential member that we try to recruit, see Parliamentary Procedure as a complex and remote set of obstacles to conducting business.

We need to teach with the purpose of simplifying this trio of powers in the member’s mind. We need to make it about them.

Lorenzo R. Cuesta, PRPhttp://[email protected]

Sacramento, CA