powerpoint 簡報 · good. more than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use...

54

Upload: others

Post on 24-Sep-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 2: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 3: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms

Page 4: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms

Wrong phytoplankton → zooplankton → fish → shark

phytoplankton → fish (not complete)

鯊吃魚, 魚吃浮游植物

錯別字

浮游植物 → 浮遊植物

浮游植物 → 浮游生物

Page 5: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 6: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 7: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 8: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms

The width of the bottom level should be at

least twice of that of the top level.

Page 9: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 10: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms

(a) is wrong

Page 11: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 12: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 13: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 14: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 15: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 16: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 17: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 18: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 19: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 20: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 21: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 22: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 23: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 24: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms

木質部提供機械性支持

Page 25: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 26: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 27: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms

植物細胞:軟縮 動物細胞:萎縮

Page 28: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms

flaccid

Page 29: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 30: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 31: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 32: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 33: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 34: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 35: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 36: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms

2015 DSE Bio 1B 10

Page 37: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms

Good. About half of the candidates managed to get full marks in this question. However, quite a number of candidates forgot to label the ancestor in the evolutionary tree. Many candidates gave the evolutionary tree in different forms: some resembled a dichotomous key used in classification, some did not indicate the timeline, and some showed unknown branches which were not labelled.

Page 38: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms

Mix up between pyramid

of number and

evolutionary tree.

No background

knowledge about

evolutionary tree

Page 39: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms

Mix up between

dichotomous key and

evolutionary tree.

Page 40: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms

No branch

Page 41: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms

‘Common ancestor’ not shown

Wrong branching pattern

Page 42: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 43: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms

Poorly answered. Many candidates simply reiterated information about separation of continents and migration of camels but failed to identify the situation as an isolation of animal groups which stopped the gene flow between the groups. When they explained how different traits resulted, they simply referred to a change in the environment rather than the fact that each animal group was facing a different set of environmental factors due to their locations in different geographical regions.

Page 44: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms

Some candidates did not attempt to use genetic materials to talk about inheritance. They simply stated that the traits were passed on to the next generation. Finally, when they described the speciation, they gave superficial answers such as ‘they failed to reproduce’ rather than using specific terms such as ‘interbreed’. Some candidates just wrote down textbook-type materials about natural selection and evolution or answers from past examinations to address this question, which were irrelevant.

Page 45: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms

‘Migrated to different places with

different environment/ climate’

not shown

Page 46: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms

Equivalent to adaptive traits

Page 47: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 48: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 49: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms

Poorly answered. Candidates gave very simple answers such as ‘compare their DNA’ or ‘check the DNA sequence’. In fact, they should specify that comparisons of some essential proteins were made specifically, the DNA sequence or amino acid sequence.

Page 50: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 51: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms

Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms ‘fossils’ and ‘fossil records’ in their answers, e.g. they gave answers such as ‘fossil records are located in inaccessible areas’ or ‘fossil records are destroyed’ which should have referred to the fossil itself rather than fossil records. Some gave very simple answers such as ‘it is difficult to find the fossils’ without referring to the actual reason.

Page 52: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 53: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms
Page 54: PowerPoint 簡報 · Good. More than half of the candidates gave at least one limitation of the use of fossil records as evidence for evolution. Candidates often mixed up the terms