[ppt]direct and indirect experience -...
TRANSCRIPT
Experience and Attitude-Behavior RelationshipAttitude influence is complex
PersonalitySituationDirect experienceIndirect experience
Example: A new foodReading about it
Attitude formed based on attributes or cognitions COGNITIVE
Tasting it - the 2nd Street Bakery BreadAttitude formed based on gut or emotional
reaction AFFECTIVE
Major questionIf direct and indirect experience changes the
degree that an attitude is affectively or cognitively based, then how does this change the attitude’s ability to predict behavior?
Many researchers have proposed that some behavior is more cognitively driven and others more affectively driven.
Terms to knowInstrumental behavior
preformed to accomplish a goal beyond the activity involved in performing it – more cognitively driven
Consummatory behaviorpreformed only for the activity involved in
performing it – more affectively driven (emotionally)
Millar & Millar - hypothesisAttitudes formed through direct experience
produce more affective reactions and are better predictors of consummatory behavior.
Alternatively, attitude formed through indirect experience produce more cognitive reaction and are better predictors of instrumental behavior.
Overall resultsResults are part of a body of evidence related
to the usefulness of the distinction between affective and cognitive based attitudes.
Application to Environmentally Responsible Behavior?
Advantages? Disadvantages?
Related articleTitle: Engaging with the natural environment:
The role of affective connection and identity
Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2008
Test: research that shows greater experience with the natural environment leads to more pro-environmental attitudes. Affect can be both an important predictor of environmental attitudes and rate as more important by participants than cognitions. Greater experiences = greater affective connections.