practical challenges and innovations in integrated ... · practical challenges and innovations in...
TRANSCRIPT
Practical Challenges and Innovations in Integrated Landscape Approaches
Nagaraja Rao Harshadeep (Harsh) Senior Environmental Specialist
Presentation at FAO Investment Days
Rome, December 16, 2014
Landscapes come in various forms…
• Basins/Watersheds • Habitats/Ecosystems • Floodplains • Agricultural Landscapes • UrbanScapes • DesertScapes • MountainScapes • LakeScapes • DeltaScapes • …
Multiple Development Objectives in Landscapes
Triple Bottom-Line Needs
Environmental Social
Economic
•Access to basic services (e.g. water
supply, energy)
•Poverty Alleviation/ income growth
•Employment/Jobs/Livelihoods
•Equity/Gender/Affordability/
Vulnerable/Indigenous People
•Reducing Resettlement/ Migration
•Community preparedness and mgmt.
of climate risks
•Sustainability of the resource base
(surface and ground water)
•Managing pollution and salinity
•Managing climate risks (floods,
droughts, climate change)
•Reducing erosion/siltation
•Conserving other ecosystem services
(biodiversity, wetlands, env flows) &
eco-tourism opportunities
•Net benefits of env. services across sectors
•Commodity exports (e.g. power, agriculture)
•Reducing imports
•Fueling sustainable growth and shared
prosperity
•Enhancing regional Cooperation
Ocean
River Basin Boundary
Irrigation
Navigation
A Typical River Basin…
…there is a need for a shared vision of the landscape
to integrate the activities of multiple actors…
Industry
Urban WSS
Precipitation
Agriculture Department
Irrigation Department
Rural Water Supply Department
Urban Water Supply Department
Power Department
Livestock Department
Industry Department
Environment Department
Fisheries Department
Transport Department
Tourism Department
Groundwater Department
Surface Water Department
Reservoir
Recreation
Hydropower
Forest Department
Ocean Development/CZM Department
Fishing
Rainfed Agr
Livestock
Forest
Rural WSS
Irrigation
Groundwater
Infiltration / Recharge
Base Flow / Pumping
Groundwater Inflow
Groundwater Outflow
Runoff
Return Flow
Community Use
Wetlands / Environment
Trans-boundary Water Institutions
Moving to a Multi-sectoral Perspective…
Sub-Watershed/Sub-Catchment
Watershed/Catchment
Sub-Basin
River Basin
Micro-Watershed/Micro-Catchment
Basin? Watershed? Catchments?
Information & Analysis
• Resource Information Base (data rescue; monitoring; comprehensive spatial, temporal and other databases; improved use of satellite data; documents)
• Knowledge Products/Special Studies (maps, Atlases, interactive toolkits, surveys)
• Access and Outreach mechanisms (publications, web portals, Apps with public access to open data services, technical/ success stories, multi-media documentation)
• Analytical Tools (models/Decision Support Systems for planning/operations support)
Khartoum
Asyut
Luxor
Nasir Reservoir
Kassala
Wad MadaniKusti
Malakal
Tana Lake
E G Y P T
S U D A N
S O U T H S U D A NE R I T R E A
E T H I O P I AAddis Ababa
Asmara
Cairo
JubaGonder
Bahir Dar
Jimma
GDP (million $/sq.km.)Data source: NOAA, 2006
Country boundaryMajor river
Capital city
Lake/Sea
E N T R OEastern Nile Technical
Regional Office
0 - 0.5
2 - 1
2 - 3
4 - 5
6 - 10
11 - 25
26 - 50
51 - 100
101 - 150
151 - 1,194
Monthly Blue Nile Flows at Khartoum
Annual Blue Nile Flows at Khartoum
Blue Nile Sub-Basin
Modernizing tools to support decisions…
• In investment planning
• In system operations
To optimize the development and management of the resource base for sustainable social, economic, and environmental benefits to current and future generations
-100%
-50%
0%
50%
100%
Tamur-1
Sun Kosi-2
Andhi Khola
Kali Gandaki-1
Kali Gandaki-2
Seti-1 (Central)
Marsyandi
Burhi Gandaki
Sapta Gandaki
TrisuliChisapani
Karnali-1B
Seti-6 (West)
Pancheswor
Kamala
Kulekhani-1
Sapt kosi
Arun III
Lower Arun
Hydropower Sensitivity to Climate Change Models (2050 A2 Scenarios)
%HP Change BCM
%HP Change CMA
%HP Change GFDL_CM2
%HP Change GISS
%HP Change MIU_ECHO
%HP Change CSIRO
%HP Change CNRM
%HP Change UKMO
%HP Change MIROC
%HP Change NCARPM1
• Strengthening Institutions (office modernization, stakeholder participation, capacity development and training incl. distance learning, improved links with academia, internships, visiting experts, professional networks/ communities of practice; forums, competitions)
• Strengthening Policies (economic instruments, streamlining institutional design/policy/mandates, improving synergy, decentralization)
Institutions & Policy
• Preparation of a robust on-the-ground investment pipeline (with adequate attention to technical, environmental, social, economic, and institutional aspects)
• Implementation facilitation, monitoring, and lessons (adequate technical assistance, ownership, M&E)
Investments & Operations
Shire Basin • Accounts for about 97%
of Malawi’s electricity • Has most of Malawi’s
irrigation • Supports rainfed
agriculture to millions – home of most of Malawi’s rural poor
• Provides water supply to Blantyre
• Has significant environmental, biodiversity, and fisheries assets
Mining
Fishing
Irrigation
Catchment Degradation
Flooding
Biodiversity
Water Infrastructure
Competing Water Uses
Droughts
Transboundary Issues
Hydropower Inland Port
Water Supply
Source: http://www.pecad.fas.usda.gov/cropexplorer/global_reservoir/gr_regional_chart.cfm?regionid=eafrica®ion=&reservoir_name=Malawi
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
Jan1900
Jan1910
Jan1920
Jan1930
Jan1940
Jan1950
Jan1960
Jan1970
Jan1980
Jan1990
Jan2000
Lake MalawiHistorical Time Series
Year Month
Average of Lake Level (m)
The Shire outflow from the Lake dried up from 1915-1935
High Erosion
Mangochi
Balaka
Machinga
Neno
Mwanza
Chiradzulu
Zomba
ChikwawaThyolo
Mulanje
Blantyre
Nkula
Kapichira
Hotspots with soil loss > 25 t/ ha/ y
Typical sedimentation blocking culverts downstream in a rivulet downstream of Chingale escarpment
Erosion gullies upstream
Sedimentation at hydropower plant downstream
Weeds interrupt power
Malawi Key Challenges
The Shire Basin Key Challenges
Need for modernizing monitoring systems
Need for Infrastructure
Biodiversity Extensive Rainfed Agriculture Flooding in the Lower Shire
Shire River Basin Management Program Sustaining long term growth and resilience
Long-term multi-sector program (15 years) to: “increase sustainable social, economic and environmental benefits by effectively and collaboratively planning, developing and managing the Shire River Basin’s natural resources. ”
Key proposed results of first phase: An intersectoral institutional mechanism for
Shire River Basin management A joint Shire River Basin Development Plan Improved flood management through better
early warning Improved climate resilience and downstream
power production through improvement land and water management practices Improved security and regulation of Shire
flows for hydropower, irrigation and water supply through upgrading Kamuzu Barrage Preparation for critical water investments
Phase –I US $125m IDA
+$6.6m GEF/LDCF
Phase –II US $125-150m
Phase –III US $125-150m
2012 2027 2017 2022
Malawi Shire River Basin Program: Proposed Phasing
Program Focus Areas: •Information: Improved collation, processing, communication, and use of information for decision support •Institutions: Improved capacity for modern shared-vision Basin planning & mgmt.; enhanced community adoption of improved land & water mgmt. practices •Investments: Preparation and implementation of a pipeline of water-related investments
•Information: Initial Basin knowledge base & real-time monitoring, Decision Support Systems for basin planning and management
•Institutions: Shire Basin Institution setup, Shire Basin Plan developed, Capacity-building of water and ecosystem related institutions and public awareness
•Investments: Kamuzu Barrage upgrading, Catchment management in selected catchments and flood management in targeted areas of Lower Shire, Preparation of new water investments
•Information: Continued knowledge base and hydromet improvement, detailed surveys, flood zoning, integration into national and regional hydromet networks
•Institutions: Strengthened Shire Basin Institution with strong legal framework, Basin Plan implementation and refinement , Continued capacity-building and public awareness
•Investments: Water investments undertaken and prepared (new and modernization), consolidation of Phase I catchment investments and work on additional priority catchments, rural energy investments
•Information: Continued knowledge base and hydromet improvement, improved integration into local, regional, and global networks
•Institutions: Shire Basin Plan implemented and updated, Continued capacity-building, Improved public-private partnerships, Disaster insurance
•Investments: Additional water investments undertaken and prepared (new and modernization), consolidation of catchment investments in earlier phases and work to cover remaining priority catchments
The Shire Basin Information
– Building a comprehensive knowledge base of the Shire Basin
– Working with modern technology (e.g. for data sharing http://masdap.mw monitoring, operational control, flood warning, conferencing)
– Using modern analytical/ modeling tools (for planning decision support, forecasting, operational decision support)
The Shire Basin Institutions
– Improving multi-sectoral coordination
– Improving training and capacity-building
– Improving links with Academia (incl. sourcing interns/young professionals to work on the Shire Basin)
– Improving stakeholder participation and communication (e.g. Shire Basin Forum & Conference
The Shire Basin Investments
– Hydromet systems
– Kamuzu Barrage rehabilitation
– Catchment management
– Forest and National Parks/ Ecological management
– Flood management
– Preparation of new water-related infrastructure and additional catchment/ flood management investments
Conclusion
• Despite challenges (complexity, multi-sectoral institutional coordination, investment needs)…
• …critical need to go beyond project-by-project, agency-by-agency approach to integrate the activities of key players in a landscape in a longer-term framework…
• Integrated Landscape approaches offer a useful way to
pursue multiple sectoral and administrative objectives (environmental, social, and economic) in a spatial context
• Interventions in a landscape context often include the 3Is that need to be considered in an integrated manner: – Information & Analysis
– Institutions & Policy
– Investments & Operations
Community Mapping example in Burundi
Going from Vision…
Mapping current situation and charting out the future
Humbo – March 2010
Humbo – February 2002 …to Reality
Tana& Beles Integrated Water Resources Development Project
For more information, please contact: Dr. Nagaraja Rao Harshadeep (Harsh) Senior Environmental Specialist The World Bank 1818 H St NW Washington, DC 20433 [email protected]
Thanks!