predation
DESCRIPTION
Predation . Lakes in North America When fish were introduced there were huge changes - predators preferred the larger zooplankton small zooplankton became dominant large phytoplankton become abundant. Brooks and Dodson 1965 (over 1350 citations). - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Predation](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081604/568164c0550346895dd6d1a0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Predation
![Page 2: Predation](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081604/568164c0550346895dd6d1a0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Effects of predation on morphology, distribution and
abundance1. Change in size structure of prey population (if predator prefers the largest individuals in a prey population)
Brooks and Dodson 1965 (over 1350 citations)
Lakes in North AmericaWhen fish were introduced there were huge changes- predators preferred the larger zooplankton- small zooplankton became dominant- large phytoplankton become abundant
![Page 3: Predation](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081604/568164c0550346895dd6d1a0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Effects of predation on morphology, distribution and
abundance2. Decreases in overall diversity – if predators are very efficient at removing prey, they drive populations to extinction which reduces diversity
3. Increase in diversity – in simple systems with few prey species, one of which is a dominant competitor. If a predator prefers the dominant competitor it can reduce the number of the dominant competitors, allowing the inferior competitors to exist.
All three of these can occur in “ecological time” = one to a few generations
![Page 4: Predation](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081604/568164c0550346895dd6d1a0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Effects of predation on morphology, distribution and
abundance4. Morphological modifications – inference from observationa. protective devices (spines on sea urchins; strong shells)
![Page 5: Predation](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081604/568164c0550346895dd6d1a0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Effects of predation on morphology, distribution and
abundance4. Morphological modifications – inference from observation
b. mimicry – organisms that resemble unpalatable species (usually because they contain toxic compounds)
![Page 6: Predation](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081604/568164c0550346895dd6d1a0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Effects of predation on morphology, distribution and
abundance4. Morphological modifications – inference from
observationc. crypsis – organisms match the color and shading of their habitats. This morphology is likely shaped by predatory pressure over time.
![Page 7: Predation](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081604/568164c0550346895dd6d1a0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Artificial camouflageDecorator crabs put algae on their backs, which increases their survivalIn areas with Dictyota spp. (algae), crabs use this species for decoration, but rarely food
![Page 8: Predation](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081604/568164c0550346895dd6d1a0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Inducible versus Constitutive defenses
A bryozoan makes spines when placed in contact with a predatory nudibranch.
A hydrozoan, Hydractinia, produces defense stolons armed with nematocysts when in contact with another colony.
![Page 9: Predation](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081604/568164c0550346895dd6d1a0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Inducible Defense:
The conical (right) and bent (left) forms of the acorn barnacle Chthamalus anisopoma. The animal develops the bent form if predatory snails are present.
![Page 10: Predation](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081604/568164c0550346895dd6d1a0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Mytilus edulis (Blue mussel)
Threat of predation leads to:• Thicker shells
• Leonard et al (1999)• Smith & Jennings (2000)
• Larger adductor muscle• Reimer & Tedengren
(1996)• Increased gonad ratios
• Reimer (1999)• Increased byssus volume
• Cote (1995)
![Page 11: Predation](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081604/568164c0550346895dd6d1a0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Predation: Indirect Effects• Non-lethal effects
– Injury by browsing predators – Trait-mediated indirect interactive effects
(TMII)• Risk averse foraging• More shelter dwelling in the presence of predators• Can produce larger effects than consumption does
– Trophic cascades
![Page 12: Predation](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081604/568164c0550346895dd6d1a0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: Predation](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081604/568164c0550346895dd6d1a0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Predation: Indirect Effects
• Non-lethal effects– Injury by browsing predators – Trait-mediated indirect effects (TMII)
• Risk averse foraging• More shelter dwelling in the presence of predators• Can produce more dramatic effects than actual
predation does– Trophic cascades
![Page 14: Predation](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081604/568164c0550346895dd6d1a0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Dugongs can modify the structure of seagrass beds through their foraging
Tiger sharks cause dugongs to change habitats, which can affect seagrass communities
![Page 15: Predation](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081604/568164c0550346895dd6d1a0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Predation: Indirect Effects
• Non-lethal effects– Injury by browsing predators – Trait-mediated indirect effects (TMII)
• Risk averse foraging• More shelter dwelling in the presence of predators• Can produce more dramatic effects than actual
predation does– Trophic cascades
![Page 16: Predation](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081604/568164c0550346895dd6d1a0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Trophic Cascade in Kelp Forests• When the keystone sea otter is removed, sea
urchins overgraze kelp and destroy the kelp forest
Figure 5.15b
![Page 17: Predation](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081604/568164c0550346895dd6d1a0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Emergent Multiple Predator Effects (MPEs)
• Types of interactions among predators (Soluk and Collins, 1988):– Neutral: predators do not affect one another’s rates
of prey consumption– Negative (interference): combined prey
consumption less than neutral values MPE– Positive (facilitation): combined prey consumption
greater than neutral values MPE