preferential accumulation of selectively preserved biomacromolecules in the humus fractions from a...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Preferential accumulation of selectively preserved biomacromolecules in the humus fractions from a peat deposit as seen by analytical pyrolysis and spectroscopic techniques](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080313/5750221a1a28ab877ea31dd8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Preferential accumulation of selectively preservedbiomacromolecules in the humus fractions from apeat deposit as seen by analytical pyrolysis and
spectroscopic techniques
Jose A. Gonzalez a,*, Francisco J. Gonzalez-Vila a,Gonzalo Almendros b, M. Cristina Zancada b, Oliva Polvillo a,
Francisco Martın a
a Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiologia de Sevilla, CSIC, Reina Mercedes 10, 41012 Sevilla, Spainb Centro de Ciencias Medioambientales, CSIC, Serrano, 115B, 28006 Madrid, Spain
Accepted 31 March 2003
Abstract
A series of structural features of the three main humic fractions (humic acid, fulvic acid and
humin) from different depths of a peat bog deposit in Mazagon (Huelva, Southern Spain) were
isolated and analysed by flash pyrolysis�/gas chromatography�/mass spectrometry, solid-state13C-nuclear magnetic resonance and Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy. Such
techniques demonstrate that the various humic fractions were very different not only in terms
of molecular weight but also in their composition and structural characteristics, showing well
differentiated patterns in the relative distribution of alkyl, O-alkyl and aromatic moieties in
each humic fraction. To a large extent, selectively preserved lignin accumulates in the humic
acid (HA) fraction, whereas the fulvic acid (FA) consists of a colloidal carbohydrate with a
substantial peptidic moiety and the humin includes the noteworthy concentration of insoluble,
macromolecular polyalkyl structures. A diagnostic lignin signature in the resolution-enhanced
infrared spectra of the HA points to processes of selective preservation of macromolecular
substances derived from vascular plants. In general, the humic fractions were not extensive
sources of chemotaxonomic descriptors of previously documented biodiversity changes along
the period of the peat deposit formation. This is in harmony with a substantial homogenising
effect of diagenetic transformations throughout the whole sedimentary record with peat
* Corresponding author. Fax: �/34-95-462-4002.
E-mail address: [email protected] (J.A. Gonzalez).
J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 68�/69 (2003) 287�/298
www.elsevier.com/locate/jaap
0165-2370/03/$ - see front matter # 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0165-2370(03)00069-X
![Page 2: Preferential accumulation of selectively preserved biomacromolecules in the humus fractions from a peat deposit as seen by analytical pyrolysis and spectroscopic techniques](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080313/5750221a1a28ab877ea31dd8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
stratigraphy recording mostly the authigenic processes of bog formation and development.
Anthropogenic perturbations may be also responsible for the loss of information in the humic
proxy resulting in the lack of an apparent relationship between any particular input and the
composition of the humic fractions from the peat bog.
# 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Histosols; Peat; Humic acids; Fulvic acids; Humin; Pyrolysis; Solid-state NMR; FT-IR
1. Introduction
Peat bog deposits were formed in peculiar paleoecosystems where the slow
biodegradation of plant residues depends on a series of pedo-climatic and
hydromorphic factors leading to a progressive accumulation of organic matter
(OM) stabilised in different evolutionary stages. Peat formation processes are slow
and the macromolecular organic components are particularly recalcitrant against
biodegradation ([1], and references therein).
From a pedological point of view, peat bog deposits are included into the
Histosols order, characterised by reduced biological activity and a complex abiotic
control of the OM transformation. The efficiency of degradation in this anoxic
environment is low, then polysaccharides are utilised preferentially over lignin [2�/4].
Due to the high performance of selective preservation processes in peat environ-
ments, the molecular composition of peat deposits may represent not only a valid
record of paleoclimatic information (usually encompassing the entire Holocene
period) but also a useful tool in paleoclimatic reconstructions. Thus, in contradiction
to the widespread view that peat stratigraphy reflects mostly the authigenic processes
of bog development, the current ideas in the field also stress the contribution of
external climatic/anthropogenic factors ([5] and references therein).
Different ways to take advantage from this geochemical information require the
study of peat stratigraphy [6], as well as the microfossil records [5�/8], which in some
cases are not present, or are not preserved at all. An alternative method is the
molecular characterisation of the different forms of OM present in the peat. In
particular, the structural characteristics of the macromolecular humic fractions have
been proved to be useful for the elucidation of diagenetic pathways during the
coalification process [9] and for obtaining information about the source of organic
materials and depositional environments [10,11]. On the other side, due to the
miscellaneous origin and variable composition of the humic materials, modern
biogeochemical research has also taken advantage of their specific molecular features
to obtain environmental information on the organisms and processes involved in soil
C sequestration mechanisms [12�/14].
Assuming the above statements, we have analysed the composition and diagenetic
processes of the OM from Laguna de las Madres peat-filled deposit (Huelva,
Southern Spain), close to the estuaries of Tinto and Odiel rivers. This ombrotrophic
bog is the most meridional among peat formations in the Northern Hemisphere, this,
together with a remarkably peculiar geomorphology [15], define a high-interest
J.A. Gonzalez et al. / J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 68�/69 (2003) 287�/298288
![Page 3: Preferential accumulation of selectively preserved biomacromolecules in the humus fractions from a peat deposit as seen by analytical pyrolysis and spectroscopic techniques](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080313/5750221a1a28ab877ea31dd8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
scenario for Mediterranean paleoclimatic research. The analytical approach included
the isolation of humic acids (HA), fulvic acids (FA) and humin fractions from a peat
section taken at different depths, and their characterisation by using both solid-state13C-NMR and FT-IR spectroscopies and flash pyrolysis (Py), in combination with
gas chromatography�/mass spectrometiy (GC�/MS).
Analytical pyrolysis has been previously employed in the research on peat origin
and degree of maturity. The volatile products released during pyrolysis oftencorrespond to well known components from plant and microbial origin [16,17]. In
particular pyrolysis is an analytical tool especially responsive to the presence and
composition of lignins. In fact, the monomer composition of lignins varies greatly
within the different botanical taxa, but it also varies in terms of their degree of
diagenetic alteration in the sedimentary environment [18,19].
On the other hand, non-destructive spectroscopic techniques provide reliable
information on the relative contribution of the different structural units to the OM
fractions of the peat considered as a whole. These analytical approaches have beenpreviously used in the study of a large variety of insoluble macromolecular
substrates, including humic and lignocellulosic materials [20�/22].
In this study pyrolytic and spectroscopic analyses of peat humic fractions were
used to study the origin and diagenetic degree of the peat OM. Data obtained here
complement previous sedimentological, palynological and lipid biomarker proxies
[23�/26], revealing vegetation history, OM diagnoses and possible anthropogenic
interferences in this depositional environment.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Sampling site
Laguna de las Madres bog is a thick peat formation of up to 5 m depth and
approximately 30 ha representing part of Mid- and the entire Late Holocene, namely
approximately 4000 years of peat accumulation. A detailed description of the peatdeposit, including vegetation and agronomical and hydrophysical properties has
been described elsewhere ([27] and references therein). Samples for this study were
collected from a 1-m depth core located in a well preserved area at the margin of the
lagoon. Two sections at 30�/40 and 70 cm were taken and dried at room temperature.
2.2. Isolation of organic matter fractions
The peat OM was separated into lipid, alkali-soluble and particulate (humin)fractions following standard procedures in humus chemistry [27,28]. Total organic
carbon and organic carbon distribution into the different fractions were determined
by wet oxidation with potassium dichromate.
The isolation of the extractable humic fractions was carried out after previous
extraction of lipid with 40�/60 8C petroleum ether. The peat residue was then
successively treated with water, to isolate the water-soluble fraction, and then with
J.A. Gonzalez et al. / J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 68�/69 (2003) 287�/298 289
![Page 4: Preferential accumulation of selectively preserved biomacromolecules in the humus fractions from a peat deposit as seen by analytical pyrolysis and spectroscopic techniques](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080313/5750221a1a28ab877ea31dd8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
0.1 M Na4P2O7 and 0.1 M NaOH, five-times each. The dark brown suprnatant
solution (total humic extract) was then precipitated by dropwise addition of 6 M
HCl to separate the acid-soluble FA from the acid-insoluble HA. The latter fraction
was then redissolved in 0.5 M NaOH and centrifuged at 43 500�/g , reprecipitated,
dialysed in cellophane bags, and desiccated at 40 8C.
The insoluble peat fraction (humin) was purified by 1 M HCl�/HF treatments at
room temperature, then dialysed for 1 week and desiccated.
2.3. Pyrolysis�/gas chromatography�/mass spectrometry
The FA, HA and humin fractions were analysed by Curie-point pyrolysis using a
Horizon Instruments device attached to a Varian Saturn 2000 GC/MS system.Samples were heated on ferromagnetic wires at 510 8C for 5 s. The interface of the Py
unit was set to 250 8C, and the gas chromatograph was programmed from 50 to
100 8C at 32 8C min�1 and then up to 320 8C at a rate of 6 8C min�1. The injection
port, attached to a liquid CO2 cryogenic unit, was adjusted from �/308 C (1 min) to
300 8C at 20 8C min�1. A fused-silica capillary column (25 m�/0.32 mm�/0.4 mm)
coated with CPSil was used. Mass spectra were acquired with a 70 eV ionising
energy. The identification of individual compounds was achieved by single ion
monitoring for different homologous series, low-resolution mass spectrometry andcomparison with published and stored (NIST and Wiley libraries) data.
2.4. Solid-state 13C-NMR spectroscopy
Solid-state 13C-NMR analyses of the fractions were performed on a Bruker DSX200 spectrometer (Bruker Analytische Messtechnik, Rheinstetten, Germany) oper-
ating at a 13C resonance frequency of 50.3 MHz. A commercial Bruker double-
bearing probe with 7-mm outer diameter and phase-stabilised zirconium dioxide
rotors was used. The cross-polarisation (CP) technique was applied during magic-
angle spinning (MAS) of the rotor at 6.8 kHz. A contact time of 1 ms was used. At
about 50 000 scans were accumulated using a pulse delay of 250 ms. Prior to Fourier-
transformation, a line broadening between 30 and 100 Hz was applied to determine
the relative C distribution. The spectra were integrated across four major chemicalshift regions, assignable to alkyl C (0�/45 ppm), N- and O-alkyl C (45�/110 ppm),
aromatic C (110�/160 ppm) and carboxyl/carbonyl C (160�/220 ppm).
2.5. Fourier-transformed IR spectroscopy
The Fourier-transformed infrared (FTIR) spectra were acquired with a Bruker
IFS28 spectrophotometer using KBr pellets with 2 mg sample. The spectra in digital
format were subjected to a procedure for resolution enhancement based on the
subtraction of the raw spectrum from a positive multiple of its second derivative
[29,30].
J.A. Gonzalez et al. / J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 68�/69 (2003) 287�/298290
![Page 5: Preferential accumulation of selectively preserved biomacromolecules in the humus fractions from a peat deposit as seen by analytical pyrolysis and spectroscopic techniques](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080313/5750221a1a28ab877ea31dd8/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Table 1
General analytical characteristics and distribution of total OM in different fractions isolated from Laguna de las Madres peat at 30�/40 and 70 cm
Sample
depth
Typea Organic C
(%)
N
(%)
C/
N
Lipidb Water-soluble
OMb
Total humic ex-
tractb
Humic acid
(HA)b
Fulvic acid
(FA)b
Huminb HA/
FA
30�/40 cm Fibric 38.0 (100) 1.87 24.3 3.08 0.75 (1.97) 15.32 (40.3) 10.87 (28.6) 4.45 (11.7) 21.92
(57.69)
2.44
70 cm Hemic 34.5 (100) 1.81 26.2 2.99 0.46 (1.33) 13.66 (39.6) 9.03 (26.2) 4.63 (13.4) 20.37
(59.05)
1.95
In brackets, percentage of the total organic carbon.a According to the size fractionation and the respective content in fibres.b g/100 g sample.
J.A
.G
on
zalez
eta
l./
J.
An
al.
Ap
pl.
Py
roly
sis6
8�
/69
(2
00
3)
28
7�
/29
82
91
![Page 6: Preferential accumulation of selectively preserved biomacromolecules in the humus fractions from a peat deposit as seen by analytical pyrolysis and spectroscopic techniques](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080313/5750221a1a28ab877ea31dd8/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
3. Results and discussion
Table 1 shows the total OM content and its quantitative distribution into the
different fractions in the two peat sections studied. A slight decrease with depth of
both total OM and humic fractions is observed. The relatively high concentrations of
lipids and the presence of water-soluble material reflect a low decomposition degree.
This is also in agreement with the low content in humic fractions and low
humification quality [27].Fig. 1 and Table 2 shows the solid-state 13C-NMR spectra obtained from the three
humic fractions and the quantitative distribution of the different C-types. The
spectra showed typical signals centred at 172 ppm (carbonyl carbons), 56 ppm
(methoxyl and a-amino carbons) most prominent signals correspond to (172 ppm),
33 ppm (signal assigned to alkyl carbons in polymethylene structures from lipid
polymers or condensed wax material) and the peaks for C1 (105 ppm) and C2, C3,
C5 (73 ppm) carbons in sugar-derived structures.
The integration values of the different C-types only reflected very small differences
between the humic fractions isolated downcore. However, outstanding differences
were found in the distribution patterns of the different C types in each humic
fraction In particular the predominantly O-alkyl character of the structures present
in the FA fraction (similar to a COOH containing, selectively preserved carbohy-
drate) and the dominance of aliphatic, mainly alkyl, structures in the humin were
Fig. 1. Solid-state 13C-NMR spectra of the humic fractions extracted from Laguna de las Madres peat.
J.A. Gonzalez et al. / J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 68�/69 (2003) 287�/298292
![Page 7: Preferential accumulation of selectively preserved biomacromolecules in the humus fractions from a peat deposit as seen by analytical pyrolysis and spectroscopic techniques](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080313/5750221a1a28ab877ea31dd8/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
evident. The presence of N-containing structures cannot be straightforwardly
recognised in the 13C-NMR because signals corresponding to amide structures
overlap those produced by alkyl, carbonyl and methoxyl structures (i.e. 33, 172 and
56 ppm).
The infrared spectra (Fig. 2) of the HA fraction show a featureless profile
corresponding to a heavily transformed macromolecular mixture. Nevertheless, after
Table 2
Solid-state 13C-NMR of the humic fractions extracted from Laguna de las Madres peat, quantitative
distribution of the different C-types
Integrated region (ppm) Fulvic acid Humic acid Humin
220�/161 Carbonyl/carbonyl C 13.729/0.24a 14.569/1.97 8.269/0.38
161�/141 Hydroxy aromatic C 4.059/2.01 8.419/0.60 5.539/0.38
141�/110 Aromatic C 9.119/3.38 20.129/2.85 13.979/1.16
110�/45 O/N-alkyl C 52.949/5.07 23.449/2.16 35.879/5.32
45�/(�/10) Alkyl C 20.169/4.87 33.449/7.51 36.339/5.85
a Standard deviation (n�/3).
Fig. 2. Detail of the 2000�/800 cm�1 region of the resolution-enhanced infrared spectra of humic and FAs
(the original spectra are superimposed).
J.A. Gonzalez et al. / J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 68�/69 (2003) 287�/298 293
![Page 8: Preferential accumulation of selectively preserved biomacromolecules in the humus fractions from a peat deposit as seen by analytical pyrolysis and spectroscopic techniques](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080313/5750221a1a28ab877ea31dd8/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
resolution enhancement the spectra showed a fairly well-defined band pattern with
diagnostic peaks centred at 1510, 1460, 1420, 1270 and 1230 cm�1, which is
interpreted as the presence of a substantial domain of selectively preserved lignin
[31,32].
No substantial differences downcore were found when analysing FT-IR spectra of
the isolated humic and FA fractions. Nevertheless, this pattern tends to be ill-defined
in the underlying 70 cm sample, as it could correspond to a more intense
transformation of plant-derived macromolecules. In addition, the spectrum shows
a low intensity alkyl stretching band (2920 cm�1) and a well-defined 1720 cm�1
carboxyl band. On the other hand, the FA spectra show no straightforwardly
recognisable lignin pattern but intense peaks centred at 1070 cm�1, suggesting a
substantial carbohydrate moiety. The resolution-enhanced spectra show a broad
band with maximum at approximately 1620 cm�1, which has probably a
miscellaneous origin [33]. Apart from the likely contribution of some aromatic
and quinoid structures to this band, the presence of ill-defined shoulders near 1550
and 1660 cm�1, to some extent recognisable in the resolution-enhanced spectrum
points to the contribution of amides coming from preserved proteinaceous materials
in the FA fraction.
Fig. 3 shows the Curie-point pyrolytic profiles of the various humic fractions
isolated from the peat core at 70 cm depth. The chemical identity and source
assignation of the major pyrolysis products is reported in Table 3. Upon pyrolysis,
the FA released typical anhydrosugar and furan compounds, as well as a wide set of
Fig. 3. Curie-point pyrograms of the HA, FA and humin fractions extracted from Laguna de las Madres
peat. The numbers on the peaks refer to Table 3; C-range refers to fatty acids.
J.A. Gonzalez et al. / J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 68�/69 (2003) 287�/298294
![Page 9: Preferential accumulation of selectively preserved biomacromolecules in the humus fractions from a peat deposit as seen by analytical pyrolysis and spectroscopic techniques](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080313/5750221a1a28ab877ea31dd8/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
N-containing products, respectively, arising from carbohydrate-derived and peptidic
structures.The HA fraction released typical methoxyphenols with both guaiacyl and syringyl
skeletons, pointing to the presence of a microbially reworked, not-extensively
demethoxylated lignin. The pyrolytic methoxyphenols have chemotaxonomic inter-
Table 3
Chemical identity of the pyrolysis products (other than long chain alkyl compounds) released from the HA
and FA fractions
Fulvic acids Humic acids
1 Pyrrole [Pr] 24 Pentanedione [Ps] 49 1-(4-Hydroxyphenyl) etha-
nol [Lig]
2 Toluene [Lig/Pp] 25 C2-Alkylbenzene [Lig/Pp] 50 Trans -4-propenylphenol
[Lig]
3 Furanone [Ps] 262-Methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one
[Ps]
51 5-Ethylpyrogallol [Lig]
4 Imidazole [Pr] 27 2-Acetylfuran [Ps] 52 4-Propylguaiacol [Lig]
5 Furaldehyde [Ps] 28 Isomer of 22 [Ps] 53 3-Methylindole [Lig]
6 Methylpyrrole [Pr] 29 5,6-Dihydropyran-2,5-dione
[Ps]
54 Vanillin [Lig/Pp]
7 Methylpyridine [Pr] 30 4 Hydroxy-5,6-dihydro-(2H)-
pyran-2-one [Ps]
55 Cis -isoeugenol [Lig]
8 Methylcyclopentenone [Ps] 31 2-Hydroxy-3 methyl-2 cyclo-
penten-1-one [Ps]
56 4-Hydroxyacetophenone
[Lig]
9 Styrene [Pp, Lig] 32 Methylphenol [Lig/Pp/Pr] 57 2,6-Dimethoxy-4-methyl-
phenol [Lig/Pp]
10 Dimethylpyrrole [Pr] 33 Isomer of 32 [Lig/Pp/Pr] 58 Trans -isoeugenol [Lig]
11 Dimethylpyridine [Pr] 34 Guaiacol [Lig] 59 Acetovanillone [Lig]
12 Methylfurancarboxaldehyde [Ps] 35 Phenylacetonitrile [?] 60 Vanillic acid methyl ester
[Lig]
13 Phenol [Lig/Pp/Pr] 36 2,4-Dimethylphenol [Lig/Pp] 61 4-Ethyl-2,6-dimethoxyphe-
nol [Lig/Pp]
14 Cyanobenzene [Pr] 37 Benzoic acid [Lig/Pp] 62 Guaiacylacetone [Lig]
15 Hydroxymethylcyclopentenone
[Ps]
38 4-Ethylphenol [Lig/Pp] 63 Vanillic acid [Lig]
16 Hydroxydihydropyranone [Ps] 39 3,4-Dihydroxybenzaldehyde
[Lig/Pp]
64 Propiovanillone [Lig]
17 Pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde [Pr] 40 Catechol [Lig/Pp] 65 2,6-Dimethoxy-4-propyl-
phenol [Lig/Pp]
18 2-Hydroxy-3-methyl-2-cyclopen-
ten-1-one [Ps]
41 4-Vinylphenol [Lig/Pp] 66 Acetosyringone [Lig]
19 Dimethylhydantoin [?] 42 4-Allylphenol [Lig/Pp] 67 Isomer of 66 [Lig]
20 4-Ethylphenol [Lig/Pp] 43 3-Methoxycatechol [Lig/Pp] 68 Syringylacetone [Lig]
21 Levoglucosenone [Ps] 44 4-Ethylguaiacol [Lig] 69 Syringic acid [Lig]
22 Hydroxymethylfuraldehyde [Ps] 45 4-Methylcatecbol [Lig/Pp] 70 Propiosyringone [Lig]
23 Hydroxypyridine [Pr] 46 Indole [Pr] 71 Syriyngyl vinyl ketone [Lig]
47 Cis -4-propenylphenol [Lig] 72 Ferulic acid [Lig]
48 4-Vinylguaiacol [Lig]
Probable source of the different Py products is indicated in brackets: Pr, protein; Lig, lignin; Ps,
polysaccharide; Pp, polyphenols ([34�/39] and references therein).
J.A. Gonzalez et al. / J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 68�/69 (2003) 287�/298 295
![Page 10: Preferential accumulation of selectively preserved biomacromolecules in the humus fractions from a peat deposit as seen by analytical pyrolysis and spectroscopic techniques](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080313/5750221a1a28ab877ea31dd8/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
est and have been previously used as sedimentary source indicators [40], since their
relative concentrations provide information on the extent to which plant-inherited
macromolecules are selectively preserved or substituted by microbially reworked or
newly formed substances.
The humin fractions yielded a high variety of alkyl molecules in agreement with
previous degradative studies, suggesting the accumulation in this fraction of
recalcitrant, insoluble, lipid polymer macromolecular material [41].In general, a correlation between pyrolytic (GC�/MS�/Pyr) and spectroscopic (13C-
NMR and FT-IR) data was found, and thus the reliable quantitative distribution of
C atoms pertaining to alkyl and aromatic structures obtained from NMR was in
acceptable agreement with the relative quantification of the pyrolysis products.
4. Conclusions
The results obtained support the view that different humic fractions originate from
relatively different precursors and were probably affected by independent mechan-
isms of selective preservation, diagenetic alteration, and microbially reworking,
being then incorporated in a different manner to the humic fractions. In particular,the humin fraction is enriched in insoluble alkyl material, revealed by both NMR
and mainly Py�/GC�/MS, whereas the HA fraction is enriched in altered lignin and
there is evidence for the preferential incorporation of carbohydrate, possibly low-
molecular weight polysaccharides (hemicelluloses), into the FA fraction, which also
contains some additional amount of N-containing compounds.
No qualitative fluctuations downcore were observed in the spectral and the
pyrolytic patterns of the different humic fractions. Consequently no clear changes in
the molecular assemblages of signature compounds along the period of the peatdeposit formation could be unambignously shown, which could in turn be used to
determine possible climatic or environmental changes.
In accordance with the view that peat stratigraphy records should reflect the
authigenic processes of bog development, it is probable that the peat formation from
Laguna de las Madres under study behaves as a highly resilient soil subsystem for the
whole peat formation period (Late-Holocene). It is a strong ombrothrophyc system,
where specialised hydrophytic vegetation and cycling hydromorphism, mostly
dependent on the microtopographic features of the area, have probably determineda peculiar internal/endogenous? dynamics, to a large extent irresponsive to the
general climatic and phytosociological changes that took place in the neighbouring
ecosystems.
Acknowledgements
This research has been supported by the Spanish CICyT under grants AMB99-
0907 and AMB99-0226-02. J.A. Gonzalez acknowledges financial support from the
J.A. Gonzalez et al. / J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 68�/69 (2003) 287�/298296
![Page 11: Preferential accumulation of selectively preserved biomacromolecules in the humus fractions from a peat deposit as seen by analytical pyrolysis and spectroscopic techniques](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080313/5750221a1a28ab877ea31dd8/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology and the European Regional Develop-
ment Fund (‘‘Ramon y Cajal’’ program).
References
[1] R.S. Clymo, in: A.I.P. Gore (Ed.), Mires: Swamp, Bog, Fen and Moor, Ecosystems of the World,
Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983, pp. 159�/224.
[2] T.K. Kirk, R.L. Farrell, Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 41 (1987) 465�/505.
[3] L.Y. Young, A.C. Frazer, J. Geomicrobiol. 5 (1987) 261�/293.
[4] P. Beguin, J.P. Aubert, FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 13 (1994) 25�/58.
[5] T. Kuder, M.A. Kruge, Org. Geochem. 29 (1998) 1355�/1368.
[6] K.E. Barber, Peat Stratigraphy and Climatic Change: A Palaeoecological Test of the Theory of Cyclic
Peat Bog Regeneration, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1981.
[7] B. van Geel, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 25 (1978) 1�/120.
[8] P. Moore, J.A. Webb, M.E. Collinson, Pollen Analysis, Blackwell Scientific, London, 1991.
[9] J.V. Ibarra, R. Juan, Fuel 64 (1985) 650�/656.
[10] T.V. Verheyen, R.B. Johns, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 45 (1981) 1899�/1908.
[11] T.V. Verheyen, R.B. Johns, D.T. Blackburn, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 46 (1982) 269�/277.
[12] D.E. Stott, J.P. Martin, Arid Soil Res. Rehab. 3 (1989) 115�/148.
[13] K. Haider, in: G. Stotzky, J.M. Bollag (Eds.), Soil Biochemistry, vol. 7, Marcel Dekker, New York,
1992, pp. 55�/94.
[14] P. Duchaufour, Euras. Soil Sci. 31 (1998) 803�/808.
[15] L.M. Caceres Puro, J. Rodrıguez Vidal, A. Rodrıguez Ramırez, V. Guerrero, in: J. Rodrıguez Vidal
(Ed.), Cuaternario Iberico, AEQUA, Huelva, Spain, 1997, pp. 143�/146.
[16] J.J. Boon, L. Dupont, J.W. de Leeuw, in: C.H. Fuchsman (Ed.), Peat and Water, Elsevier, London,
1986, p. 215.
[17] S.A. Stout, J.J. Boon, W. Spackman, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 52 (1988) 405.
[18] F. Martin, C. Saiz-Jimenez, F.J. Gonzalez-Vila, Holzforschung 33 (1979) 210�/212.
[19] J.R. Ertel, J.I. Hedges, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 48 (1984) 2065�/2074.
[20] R. Frund, D.H. Ludemann, Sci. Total Environ. 81/82 (1989) 157�/168.
[21] F.J. Gonzalez-Vila, D.H. Ludemann, F. Martin, Geoderma 31 (1983) 3�/15.
[22] M.A. Wilson, Techniques and Applications in Geochemistry and Soil Chemistry, Pergamon Press,
Oxford, 1987.
[23] J. Menendez-Amor, F. Florschutz, Estud. Geol. 20 (1964) 183�/186.
[24] A.C. Stevenson, J. Biogeogr. 12 (1985) 293�/314.
[25] C. Zazo, A.M. Lezıne, F. Borjs, M. Denefle, C.J. Dabrio, J. Lario, J. Rodrıguez Vidal, J.L. Goy, F.
Dıaz del Oimo, L. Caceres, L. Clemente, C. Baeteman, A. Rodrıguez Ramırez, INQUA Newslett. 18
(1996) 13�/17.
[26] L. Clemente, F.J. Gonzalez-Vila, O. Polvillo, J.A. Gonzalez, C. Yanez, G. Aimendros, M.C.
Zancada, Quaternary Climatic Changes and Environmental Crises in the Mediterranean Region,
Abstracts to the Meeting, Alcala de Henares, Madrid, 15�/18 July 2002, p. 38.
[27] G. Almendros, A. Polo, E. Dorado, Anales INIA 18 (1982) 29�/42.
[28] F.J. Gonzalez-Vila, G. Almendros, F. Madrid, Sci. Total Environ. 236 (1999) 215�/229.
[29] A. Rosenfeld, A. Kak, Digital Picture Processing, vol. 1 and 2, Academic Press, 1982.
[30] G. Almendros, J. Sanz, Soil Biol. Biochem. 23 (1991) 1147�/1154.
[31] V.C. Farmer, R.I. Morrison, Sci. Proc. R. Dublin Soc. 1 (1960) 85�/104.
[32] D. Fengel, G. Wegener, Wood: Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin,
1984.
[33] M.J.D. Low, A.S. Glass, Spectrosc. Lett. 22 (1989) 417�/429.
[34] D. Fabbri, G. Chiavari, G. Galletti, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 37 (1996) 161�/172.
[35] P. Leinweber, H.R. Schulten, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 49 (1999) 359�/383.
J.A. Gonzalez et al. / J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 68�/69 (2003) 287�/298 297
![Page 12: Preferential accumulation of selectively preserved biomacromolecules in the humus fractions from a peat deposit as seen by analytical pyrolysis and spectroscopic techniques](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080313/5750221a1a28ab877ea31dd8/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
[36] F. Martin, C. Sainz-Jimenez, A. Cert, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 41 (1977) 1114�/1118.
[37] F. Martin, C. Saiz-Jimenez, F.J. Gonzalez-Vila, Holzforschung 33 (1979) 210�/212.
[38] J. Ralph, R.D. Hatfield, J. Agric. Food Chem. 39 (1991) 426�/1437.
[39] H.R. Schulten, C. Sorge, Eur. J. Soil Sci. 46 (1995) 567�/579.
[40] P. Tinoco, G. Almendros, F.J. Gonzalez-Vila, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 64 (2002) 407�/420.
[41] G. Almendros, M.E. Guadalix, F.J. Gonzalez-Vila, F. Martin, Org. Geochem. 24 (1996) 651�/659.
J.A. Gonzalez et al. / J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 68�/69 (2003) 287�/298298