preliminary detailed design review

42
Preliminary Detailed Design Review Periodontal Measurement Test System February 1, 2013

Upload: ivrit

Post on 23-Feb-2016

49 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Preliminary Detailed Design Review. Periodontal Measurement Test System February 1, 2013. Periodontal Measurement Test System. Current method Goals of new method. Customer Needs. Specifications. Pugh Matrix. Canadianawareness.org. Phantom tooth. Specifications. Phantom Design. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Periodontal Measurement Test SystemFebruary 1, 2013

Page 2: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Periodontal Measurement Test System

• Current method• Goals of new method

Page 3: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Customer Needs

Page 4: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Specifications

Page 5: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Pugh Matrix

Page 6: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

PHANTOM TOOTH

Canadianawareness.org

Page 7: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Specifications

Spec Description CN

3.1 The phantom tooth shall be made of non-biological materials that mimic human tissue with respect to ultrasonic wave propagation properties. 8, 9, 10

3.2 The phantom tooth shall be able to be quickly replaced within the phantom holding fixture. 3, 11

3.3 The phantom tooth geometry shall allow for quick alterations of the physical relationship between the tooth and the gums. 1, 4

Page 8: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Phantom Design

Page 9: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Phantom Design

Page 10: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Relevant US Properties

• Density• Speed of sound• Acoustic impedance

Page 11: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Material Selection

Page 12: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Contacts

• Dr. Phillips – RIT bio medical engineering• Dr. Maria Helguera – RIT imaging science– Biomed ultrasound

• Eastman Dental Clinic – Dr. Caton• Bradley Rogge – RIT’s Pre-dental association• Professor Lamkin-Kennard – RIT Mechanical

Engineering• Hamad Ghazle, Jodie Crowley – RIT Ultrasound

Page 13: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

FIXTURE DESIGN

Page 14: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

SpecificationsSpecification Description Customer

Needs1.0 Test Probe Fixture 1.1 The test probe fixture must be able to move through 3 axis. 51.2 The test probe fixture shall be compact and portable. 3, 4, 11, 12

1.3The test probe fixture shall be simply constructed to allow for maintenance to be performed by untrained personnel relying only on a maintenance manual (to be provided). 3, 4, 11, 12

1.4

The test probe fixture shall allow for position changes on or about any axis to a programmatically specified point to within 0.1 mm for linear movement or 1° for angular movement. 2, 5, 6

1.5The test probe fixture shall hae minimal impact on the environment and noise levels within the surrounding area while active.

5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

2.0 Phantom Holding Fixture 2.1 The phantom holding fixture must be able to move through 2 axis. 5

2.2The phantom holding fixture shall be simply constructed to allow for maintenance to be performed by untrained personnel relying only on a maintenance manual (to be provided). 3, 4, 11, 12

2.3

The phantom holding fixture shall allow for position changes on or about any axis to a programmatically specified point to within 0.1 mm for linear movement or 1° for angular movement. 2, 5, 6

2.4The phantom holding fixture shall allow for the phantom tooth to be replaced by a human mandible. 11

2.5The phantom holding fixture shall be simply constructed to allow for maintenance to be performed by untrained personnel relying only on a maintenance manual (to be provided). 3, 4, 11, 12

Page 15: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Positioning System Model

Page 16: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Power Screw

Page 17: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Turn Table

Page 18: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Assembly Drawing

Page 19: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Pitch Movement

Page 20: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Power Screw Assembly

Page 21: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Power Screw Specs Power Screw Specs Nut Specs

Material 303 Stainless Self Lubricating Polyacetal

Total Length (in) 24 1.9

Pitch (in) 0.25 0.25

Diameter (in) 0.375 0.375

Supplier Haydon Kirk Haydon Kirk

Price 62.83 29.87

Efficiency (%) 70 70

Thread Direction Right Right

Dynamic Load - 10

Drag Torque (oz-in) - 1 to 5

Page 22: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Nut Detailed Drawing

Page 23: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Turn Table Drawing

Page 24: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Pitch Axis Drawing

Page 25: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Mounting Table Drawing

Page 26: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Guide Rail Clamp

Page 27: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Pitch Selection Calculations

Maximum Screw Pitch to Meet Accuracy Req's

Expected Stepper Motor Speeds

w/o Micro-Stepping (rev/sec) 16

w/ Micro-Stepping (rev/sec) 2 Pmax (mm) 36

Motor Angular Accuracy (deg) 1 Pmin (in) 1.417323

Desired Linear Accuracy (+/- mm) 0.1 Maximum Screw Pitch to Meet Travel Time Req's

Estimated Screw Length (in) 10

Estimated Screw Length (mm) 254

Estimated Time of Travel (s, full L) 12 Pmax (mm) 10.58333

Chosen Screw Pitch (in) 0.25 Pmax (in) 0.416667

Page 28: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Torque Requirement CalculationsProperty Symbol Units Value Required Torque to Overcome FrictionScrew Pitch P rev/in 4Load on Screw W oz 16Screw Efficiency e 0.7 Tfric (oz-in) 0.036378

Static Friction Coeff-nut on screw μs 0.04

Accel of Gravity G in/sec2 384 Jload 0.02533Time to reach constant Vel t sec 0.1Density of Screw ρ oz/in3 4.624 Jscrew 0.089772Length of Screw L in 10Radius of Screw R in 0.1875Load on Screw W oz 16

Ang velocity of motor ω rad/sec 12.5663706 Taccel (oz-in) 0.395513Screw Pitch P rev/in 4Motor Inertia Jmotor oz-in^2 1.0934959

Total Torque (oz-in) 0.431891

Note: All values for 1lb load on horizontal screw

Page 29: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Bearing Selection

• Very low radial loads– Guide rail support

• Small axial loads– Low friction nut– Guide rail support

• Basic radial bearing should handle loads

Page 30: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Bearing Specs

Bearing Specs

Style Double Sealed

ID (in) 0.375

OD (in) 0.6875

Width (in) 0.3125

Dyn. Load Cap (lbs) 255

Price (ea) 8.38

Quantity 6

Page 31: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Couplings

Coupling Specs

Material Steel

ID (in) 0.25

OD (in) 0.5

Length (in) 0.75

Set Screw Size 10-32

Max RPM 3450

Max Torque 59

Price 6.93

Page 32: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Collars

Collar Specs

Material Steel

ID (in) 0.25

OD (in) 0.5

Length (in) 0.28125

Set Screw Size 10-32

Price 0.63

Page 33: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

ELECTRICAL

Page 34: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Specifications

• 4.0 – Proof of concept put together, proved we could attain appropriate control required for final system

• 5.0 – Unable to test, waiting on probe, able to communicate with an oscilloscope, but no data has been attained from probe to date due to lack of probe

• 6.0 – Have data logging already written in code, working on limit comparison programming

Page 35: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

BLOCK DIAGRAM

Page 36: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

WIRING DIAGRAM

Page 37: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

PROGRAMMING FLOWCHART

Page 38: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

ELECTRICAL BOM AND COST

Preferred List

Item Part Number Manufacturer Lead Time Cost Qty Extended Cost

Arduino UNO UNO R3 Arduino 3-5 days $ 24.95 1 $ 24.95

Servo HS-225MG Hitec 3-5 days $ 35.99 2 $ 71.98

Stepper RB-SOY-14 SOYO 3-5 days $ 44.28 3 $ 132.84

EasyDriver B004G4XR60 Sparkfun 3-5 days $ 14.95 6 $ 89.70

Misc Budget $ 100.00 1 $ 100.00

$ 419.47

Page 39: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Justification

Control System• Arduino is very compatible with

LabVIEW• Arduino is low cost and as a skill

is going to be part of the new Control System curriculum at RIT

• EasyDriver motor control boards are inexpensive and individually replaceable if damaged.

• EasyDriver allows us to do Full, stepping to increase control.

Motors• Servos were chosen for

combination of price, mobility, and durability.

• Metal servo with high torque rating to allow ease of use with system design

• Stepper motors were picked based off of Voltage, Current, torque, and Driver limitations

Page 40: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Risk Assessment

Page 41: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

High Risk Items

• Non-bio materials– Availability– Similarity to human tooth

• Formation of phantom– Processes available hinge on materials chosen

• Probe!

Page 42: Preliminary Detailed Design Review

Questions/Comments/Suggestions