preliminary results from coal-bed methane drilling in panola county, texas · 2000. 3. 30. ·...
TRANSCRIPT
1
PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM COAL-BED METHANE DRILLING IN
PANOLA COUNTY, TEXASP.D. WARWICK, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VAC.E. BARKER, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO
J.R. SANFILIPO, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VAL.E. MORRIS, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Available on the Internet at http://energy.er.usgs.gov
U.S. Department of InteriorU.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-048
This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic
nomenclature. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.G.S.
Figure 1. Title page.
2
INTRODUCTION - OUTLINE
* This is work in progress! Only preliminary data are presented
* Overview of NE TX/LA coal geology & drill site location
* Results: coal and gas physical characteristics & geochemistry
* Conclusions and where do we go from here?
•Acknowledgements: Phillips Coal, TXU Mining Company, and co-workers at TX A&M and USGS
Figure 2. Introduction and outline. In June, 1999, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and Texas A&M University drilled two coal bed methane test holes in Panola County, Texas. The following diagrams provide some preliminary results from drilling and samples collected. The first hole (USGS-PA-1) contained no measurable gas. The second hole (USGS-PA-2), contained some coal gas, and is the focus of this presentation.
3
Coal Fields of the United States
~ 6,000 ft depth
Coal Rank
Lignite
Sub-bituminous
Medium and High-volatile BituminousLow-volatile Bituminous
Anthracite
*
*
*
*
** of unknown extent
Coal Fields of the United States
~ 6,000 ft depth
Figure 3. Coal field map of the United States. Note the relative size of the Gulf Coast coal region compared to other coal-bearing regions of the country. Also note that the Gulf coal-bearing strata dip southward into the Gulf of Mexico basin. An estimated 6,000 ft (1828 m) depth to top of the coal-bearing formations is shown.
4
TX LA
AROK
County/Parish Boundary
State Boundary
JACKSON GROUP
EXPLANATION
20 0 20 40 60 Miles
20 0 20 40 60 Kilometers
CLAIBORNE GROUP
WILCOX GROUP
Surface Geology
(Eocene)
(Eocene)
(Paleocene - Eocene)
Figure 4. Generalized outcrop of coal-bearing units and major structural features in the Sabine Uplift area of Northeast Texas and Northwestern Louisiana.
5
Eoc
ene
Pal
eoce
ne
Upp
er
Cre
t.
Claiborne Group
Navarro Group
Jackson Group
Wilcox Group
Midway Group
Stratigraphy of coal-bearingintervals in the U.S. Gulf Coastal Plain
Coal zone
Figure 5. Stratigraphy of coal-bearing units in the Gulf Coastal area. Arrows indicate position of major coal zones. Most coal mine production is from the Wilcox Group.
6
Historical Coal Mining Sites
County/Parish Boundary
State Boundary
JACKSON GROUP
EXPLANATION
20 0 20 40 60 Miles
20 0 20 40 60 Kilometers
CLAIBORNE GROUP
WILCOX GROUPCoal Mining Permit Areaand Mine Name
Surface Geology
TX LA
AROK
(Eocene)
(Eocene)
(Paleocene - Eocene)
Figure 6. Generalized outcrop of coal-bearing units and location of current and historic coal mines in the Sabine Uplift area of Northeast Texas and Northwestern Louisiana. Coal beds cored from shallow drill holes (<150 ft or 46 m deep), near the Calvert and Jewett mines, showed no gas content when tested.
7
x
x
County/Parish Boundary
State Boundary
JACKSON GROUP
EXPLANATION
20 0 20 Miles
20 0 20 Kilometers
CLAIBORNE GROUP
WILCOX GROUPCoal Mining Permit Areaand Mine Name
Surface Geology
(Eocene)
(Eocene)
(Paleocene - Eocene)
TX LA
AROK
Figure 7. Close-up map of the Sabine Uplift area. Green “X” indicates location of stratigraphic control from drill holes. Green line is approximate line of section for cross section from Luppens (1987). Black “X” indicates location of 1999 USGS coal-bed methane test holes. Areas colored red are surface coal mine permits.
8
Eoc
ene
Pal
eoce
ne
Upp
er
Cre
t.
Claiborne Group
Navarro Group
Jackson Group
Wilcox Group
Midway Group
Stratigraphy of the LA Sabine Area
100 ft
Black Lake B
Top coal
Naborton 2 or
Cow Bayou 1 or
Naborton 3 or
Naborton 4 or
Naborton 5
B lack Lake A Cow Bayou and Younger Forma tions
Dolet Hills Form ation
Naborton Formation
Sandstone and siltstone
Mudstone and claystone
Coal and carbonaceous shale
Limestone
Chemard Lake
Yellow seam
Red seam
Green seam
Coalbed names
Figure 8. Detailed stratigraphy of the coal-bearing part of the Louisiana Sabine Uplift. Italicized coalbed names are from Williamson (1986).
9
Regional Stratigraphy For TX Sabine
M in e d c o a l b e d
1 1 3 4 4 -O HR K - 4 C R E K L A WC A R R IZ OO A K H IL L M IN E
M A R T IN L A K E M IN E
U . W I L C O X
'S IM S B O R O ' (? )
B l a c k L a k e B e d(? ) o f L o u i s i a n a
D O L E T H IL L S M IN E
L . W I L C O X
M ID W A Y
S Y - 1 C
1 0 0 f t
1 2 5 0 -
0 -
R e s G a mD e n
Wilc
ox
Figure 9. Composite boreholes showing regional correlation of the undivided Wilcox Group in the Texas part of the Sabine Uplift. Data modified from Oak Hill mine permits (1134-OH) and Kaiser (1990). Red arrows indicate stratigraphic position of coal beds mined at surface mines shown on figure 6.
10
300
200
100
0
-100
-200
-300
-400
-500
300
200
100
0
-100
-200
-300
-400
-500
300
200
100
0
-100
-200
-300
-400
-500
300
200
100
0
-100
-200
-300
-400
-500
Elevation (ft)
Resistivity
Natural Gamma
Gamma - Gamma density
Mining area East West
TX|LA
After Luppens (1987)Naborton No. 2 ~20ft thick
WestEast
Figure 10. Regional cross section from Luppens (1987). Note that this is one cross section joined as indicated by the join line. Heavy black lines indicate stratigraphic position of the Naborton No. 2 or Chemard Lake coal zone. The arrow indicates an area where the Naborton No. 2 bed is about 20 ft (6 m) thick. Drill hole USGS-PA-2 was located in this area. Note the area where the coal is mined (upper section). Location of the line of section and mining area is shown on figure 7.
11
Figure 11. Photograph of Texas A&M drill rig on site at USGS-PA-2.
12
250
200
150
100
50
0
-50
-100
250
200
150
100
50
0
-50
-100
USGS-PA-1USGS-PA-2
Calipe
rGam
ma
Density
Resistiv
ity
Ele
vatio
n (f
t)
SandstoneMudstoneCalcareous SandstoneCoal
?
Figure 12. Generalized stratgraphic column and geophysical logs from USGS core holes in Panola County, Texas. Locations are shown on figure 7. Only USGS-PA-2 contained coal bed gas.
13
Figure 13. Coal core being measured and described prior to insertion into the desorption canisters at USGS-PA-1. Note clay parting in coal core on the left end of the core. The clay parting occurs at depth 331.2 – 331.35 ft (USGS-PA-1) or about 0.2 ft from the top of the coal bed in both USGS-PA-1 and PA-2.
14
Figure 14. Close-up of clay parting in USGS-PA-1. This is probably a volcanic ash or tonstein. The clay parting occurs at depth 331.2 – 331.35 ft (USGS-PA-1) or about 0.2 ft from the top of the coal bed in both USGS-PA-1 and PA-2. A similar ash parting occurs in the same position of the coal being mined at the Dolet Hills and Oxbow mines in Louisiana (fig. 6; also see Ruppert and Warwick, 1994). The occurrence of this ash layer supports Luppens (1987) regional correlation shown on figure 10.
15
354356358360362364366368370372374
0 10 20 30 40 50 60Percent
Ash and moisture vs depthUSGS-PA-2 (ar)
Moisture(x = 28.49%)
Ash(x = 13.82%)
USGS-PA-1 average ash = 11.6% and moisture = 34.67% (ar)
dept
h (f
t)
Figure 15. Plot of ash yield and moisture (as received basis, ar) for gas-bearing coal samples from USGA-PA-2. Note the high ash yield in the middle of the bed. Average ash and moisture values for the coal samples from USGA-PA-1 are given at the bottom of the illustration.
16
USGS-PA-2 Percent Sulfur (ar)
354356358360362364366368370372374
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Sulfur (x = 0.52%)
dept
h (f
t)
Figure 16. Plot of sulfur content (as received basis, ar) for gas-bearing coal samples from USGS-PA-2.
17
354356358360362364366368370372374
4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 8000 8500 9000 9500
Btu MMmFx = 8422
USGS-PA-2 Btu (MMmF)de
pth
(ft)
_
ligA subC
Figure 17. Plot of calorific values (Btu/lb on a moist, mineral matter free basis, MMmf) for gas-bearing coal samples from USGS-PA-2. Note most samples plot above 8300 Btu/lb, the boundary between lignite and sub-bituminous.
18
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
18000.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45
Ro mean
Depth vs Rofor Naborton No. 2 Coal
Dep
th (f
t)
PRB data from Mavor and others (1999)
% Ro mean
USGS-PA-2
Texas data from Mukhopadhyay (1989)
PRB
Figure 18. Plot of vitrinite reflectance data for the Naborton No. 2 (Chemard Lake) coal in Texas. Blue points from Mukhopadhy (1989). Red point is from USGS-PA-2. White stars are from Powder River basin (PRB) data (Mavor and others, 1999). The deep samples (>1400 ft) with high (>0.4%) Ro values indicate coal rank increase with depth.
19
Figure 19. Photograph showing constant temperature water baths used with the coal desorption canisters.
20
Cumulative Desorbed Volume (cc) (USGS-PA-2-CN5)
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 2 4 6 8
Square root of time (hr)
Cum
ulat
ive
deso
rbed
volu
me
(cc)
Cumulative Desorbedvolume (cc)
Lost gas estimate 40.0 ccraw total gas 0.26 g/cc (8.46 SCF/ton)daf total gas 0.43 g/cc (13.62 SCF/ton)
Figure 20. Example of one of the desorption plots from USGS-PA-2 (canister no. 5, which is about 5 ft (1.5 m) from the top of the coal bed; daf= dry, ash free basis).
21
USGS-PA-2Desorbed Gas SCF/ton
355
360
365
370
3750 10 20 30 40
SCF/Ton
Dep
th (f
t)
SCF/Ton daf
SCF/T rawx = (11 SCF/t)
x = (7 SCF/t)_
_
Figure 21. Results of all desorption tests on coal from USGS-PA-2. Note the higher gas content in the upper part of the coal bed. daf = dry, ash free basis.
22
(Modified from Whiticar, 1990; Clayton, 1998)
Figure 22. Isotopic composition of carbon (y axis) and hydrogen (x axis) for methane from a gas sample collected from one USGS-PA-2 coal sample. The values obtained from the sample are shown along the axes in red. Note that the gas sample plots in the mixed or transition zone between gases of biogenic and thermogenic origin and is different from Powder River basin (PRB) gases. Diagram after Clayton (1998).
23
Diagram modified from Bernard and others (1978); Faber and Stahl (1984); and Whiticar (1994).
Figure 23. Bernard diagram for a gas sample collected from one USGS-PA-2 coal sample. The plot shows the molecular ratio of C1, C2 and C3(methane, ethane, and propane) and carbon isotopic composition in methane. The values obtained from the USGS-PA-2 sample are plotted along the axes in red. Note that the gas plots in the transition region of the diagram. The dryness of the gas indicates it is out of the thermal region. Diagram modified from Bernard and others (1978); Faber and Stahl (1984); and Whiticar (1994).
24
USGS-PA-2-CN2 Methane Adsorption
020406080
100120140160180200
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Sample Cell Equilibrium Pressure (PSI)
Met
hane
Ads
orbe
d (S
CF/
Ton)
AS RECEIVED BASIS
DRY ASH FREE BASIS
Figure 24. Example of a methane sorption isotherm for a sample from near the top of the gas-bearing interval sampled in USGS-PA-2. Note the difference between the as-received and dry, ash-free bases.
25
USGS-PA-2 Methane Adsorption (As Received)
0102030405060708090
100
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Pressure (PSI)
Met
hane
Ads
orbe
d (S
CF/
Ton)
CN2 32.9, 7.9
CN6 32.7, 4.4
CN12 26.5, 19.1
CN16 32.2, 4.3
Moi
stur
e%
Ash
%
Fusain rich
Vitrain rich
PRB Pratt and others (1999)
Depths expected for Normal hydrostatic gradient (Tissot & Welte, 1978)
1000 ft 2000 ft
Figure 25. Plot of methane adsorption potential (as-received basis) for four samples from USGS-PA-2. The difference in adsorption potential may be associated with sample organic composition. Examination of sample CN16 in hand sample indicates it is fusain rich, and sample CN6 is vitrain rich. Expected depths are plotted above the corresponding pressures as derived from a normal hydrostatic gradient (from Tissot and Welte, 1978). Published adsorption values for Powder River basin (PRB) coals are plotted for comparison (green dots, data from Pratt and others, 1999). Sample number approximately indicates the depth in feet from the top of the coal.
26
USGS-PA-2 Methane Adsorption (dry, ash free)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Pressure (PSI)
Met
hane
Ads
orbe
d (S
CF/
Ton)
CN2
CN6
CN12
CN16
Fusain rich
Vitrain rich
Figure 26. Plot of methane adsorption potential (dry, ash free basis) for four samples from USGS-PA-2 (same samples as shown on figure 25). Note that on a dry basis CN16 (fusain rich) and CN6 (vitrain rich) still diverge. Also note the effect of removing ash and moisture on the range of gas adsorbed. The grouping of samples CN2, CN6, and CN12 probably indicates that have these samples have similar organic compositions.
27
USGS-PA-2-CN2CH4 and CO2 adsorption isotherms
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Pressure (PSI)
Sto
rage
Cap
acity
(SC
F/To
n)
CH4 (ar)
CO2 (ar)
CH4 (daf)
CO2 (daf)
Figure 27. Comparison of methane and CO2 adsorption isotherms on as-received (ar) and dry, ash-free (daf) basis for sample CN2. CO2adsorption characteristics are important for determining the CO2 storage capacity for the coal.
28
Kac
Kac
Ksm
Kol
Kes
Kes
Tm
Tk
Twi
Tin
Tin
Tc
Tc
Tr
Tb
Tb
Tqc
Tep
Tl
Tw Ts
Tcm
Ty
Tj
Tep
Ku
Ku
Tk
Kol
MEXICO
U.S.
100101
28
27
Laredo
Ki
Ki
Ki
Ki
Balcones Igneous Province
Ki
Qb
Ti
Ti
99
29
Ksm
Kl
Kl
Kl
CFE Power Plant
MICARE Mine Blocks
DosRepublicas Permit
FARCOMINING CO.
Eagle Pass
Uvalde
Qb
Qb
0 50 km
30 mi
KuKi
INDEX MAP
TX
N
BITUM
INO
US
SUBBITU
MIN
OU
SLIG
NITE
Geology &Rank mapof South Texas
(SanFilipo, 1999)
Figure 28. Geologic map lower Tertiary and Upper Cretaceous rocks in South Texas showing generalized rank boundaries. For explanation of map units see SanFilipo (1999). This area is currently undergoing exploration for coal bed gas. Note the anomalous increase in rank toward the southwest.
29
Conclusions
•USGS-PA-1 and shallow (<150 ft) Wilcox coals had only traces of gas
•USGS-PA-2 had a show of gas (about 7 (ar) or 11 (daf) scf/ton) •Isotopic signatures indicate the gas was generated in the transition zone between biogenic and thermogenic realms consistent with the approximate subbituminous rank of the coal
•Detailed coring and desorption/adsorption studies are needed to characterize the CBM production and CO2 storage potential for the Gulf Coastal Plain Province
•Our data suggest that deeper Gulf Coastal Plain Wilcox and Upper Cretaceous coal beds warrant testing for commercial CBM accumulations http://energy.er.usgs.gov
Figure 29. Conclusions.
30
References
Ruppert, L.F., and Warwick, P.D., 1994, Volcanic ash fall material in the Chemard Lake lignite, Naborton Formation, Desoto and Red River Parishes, Louisiana [abs.]: The Society for Organic Petrology, Eleventh Annual Meeting Abstracts and Program, Jackson, Wyoming, v. 11, p. 90.
SanFilipo, J.R., 1999, Some speculations on coal-rank anomalies of the South Texas Gulf Province and adjacent areas of Mexico and their impact on coal-bed methane and source rock potential, in Warwick, P.D., Aubourg, C.E. and Willett, J.C., eds., Tertiary Coals in South Texas: anomalous cannel-like Coals of Webb County (Claiborne Group, Eocene) and lignites of Atascosa County (Jackson Group, Eocene) - geologic setting, character, source-rock and coal-bed methane potential: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File 99-301, p. 37-47.
Tissot, B. P., and Welte, D. H., 1978, Petroleum formation and occurrence; a new approach to oil and gas exploration: Berlin, Springer-Verlag, p. 521.
Whiticar, M.J., 1990, A geochemical perspective of natural gas and atmospheric methane, in Durand, B., and Behar, F. eds., Advances in Organic Geochemistry 1989: Oxford,Pergamon Press, p. 531-547.
Whiticar, M.J., 1994, Correlation of natural gasses with their sources, in Magoon, L.B., Dow, W.G., eds., The petroleum system - from source to trap: American Association of Petroleum Geologist Memoir 60, p. 261-283.
Williamson, D.R., 1986, Lignites of northwest Louisiana and the Dolet Hills lignite mine, in Finkelman, R.B., Casagrande, D.J. (eds.), Geology of Gulf Coast Lignites: Environmental and Coal Associates, p. 13-28.
Bernard, B.B., Brooks, J.M., and Sackett, W.M., 1978, Light hydrocarbons in recent Texas continental shelf and slope sediments: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 83, p. 289-291.
Clayton, J.L, 1998, Geochemistry of coalbed gas - A review: International Journal of Coal Geology, v. 35, p. 159-173.
Faber, E., and Stahl, W., 1984, Geochemical surface exploration for hydrocarbons in the North Sea: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 68. P. 363-386.
Kaiser, W.R., 1990, The Wilcox Group (Paleocene-Eocene) in the Sabine Uplift area, Texas: depositional systems in deep-basin lignite: Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin Special Publication, 20 p.
Luppens, J.A., 1987, Distribution of lignite in the Lower Wilcox Group in the Sabine Uplift region of Texas and Louisiana, in Finkelman, R.B., Casagrande, D.J., and Benson, S.A., eds., Gulf Coast Lignite Geology: Environmental and Coal Associates, p. 262-267.
Mavor, Matt, Pratt, Tim, DeBruyn, Roland, 1999, Study quantifies Powder River coal seam properties: Oil and Gas Journal, April 26, 1999, p. 35-40.
Mukhopadhyay, P.K., 1989, Organic petrography and organic geochemistry of Texas Tertiary coals in relation to depositional environment and hydrocarbon generation: University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology Report of Investigations no. 188, 118 p.
Pratt, T.J., Mavor, M.J., and DeBruyn, R.P., 1999, Coal gas resource and production potential of subbituminous coal in the Powder River Basin: 1999 International Coalbed Methane Symposium Proceedings, Tuscaloosa, p. 23-34
Figure 30. References.