prematurity and academic achievement
TRANSCRIPT
Bryan L. Williams, Ph.D.,Associate Professor
What is it?
Who or what is responsible for it?
What are the consequences of poor achievement?
• Wide-spread attention to teacher quality in the education literature
(Borman & Kimball, 2005; Darling-Hammond, 2006; Hopkins & Stern,
1996; Newton et al., 2010).
• Value-Added Modeling (VAM) of the effect of teacher quality: some
evidence that teacher quality and effectiveness are positively related to
changes in performance over course of an academic year (Newton et
al., 2010; Wayne & Youngs, 2003).
• Maybe we should consider maternal and child health…
• Maybe prematurity, low birth weight, and maternal risk factors account for a significant proportion of unexplained, within-classroom variance in student achievement.
Being born too early increases the risk of:• Neonatal morbidity and mortality
• Early and long term neurological impairment
• Lower quality of life
Our ability to decrease prematurity is
increasing• Prenatal care
• Reexamination of standard clinical practice
• Interpregnancy and pre-conception care
Jain (2008) points out, “Needless to say, the
growing brain and body are deceptively
capable of keeping adverse effects masked
until cognitive and motor functions can be
meaningfully tested”.
What is the longer term consequences of
prematurity on children across the
gestational age spectrum?
What is the relationship
between prematurity,
birthweight for gestational age,
and performance on the
standardized test among
children born in Georgia?
Electronic Birth Record (1998-2003)
CRCT Test (2004-2010)
Grades 1-3
Linked Georgia Birth-
Education Data Set
Mother-
Infant
Hospital
Discharge
Data
Criterion-Referenced Competency Tests (CRCT)
• Designed to measure how well students acquire the skills and
knowledge described in the Georgia Performance Standards
• Administered in Grades 1-8
• Domains of interest:
English Language Arts
Reading
Source: http://www.doe.k12.ga.us/ci_testing.aspx?PageReq=CI_TESTING_CRCT
Inherent truncated variability of minimal competency
tests
Inability to obtain non-resident births
Incomplete or inaccurate maternal and infant records
Lack of earlier outcome measure (i.e., Pre-K)
Inability to assess longitudinal changes in achievement
NH White54%
NH Black36%
Hispanic10%
Maternal Ethnicity
NH White52%NH Black
37%
Hispanic11%
Child Ethnicity
• Births that have matching student
information
• Singleton births
• Infants with birth weight 400 g to 5000 g
• Infants of gestational age 20 to 43 weeks
• Infants without recorded congenital
anomalies and chromosomal defects
31%22% 19% 16% 17%
55%60% 60% 60% 59%
13%18%
22%25% 24%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Extreme Premature
(<28)
Moderately Premature
(29-33)
Late Premature
(34-36)
Term (37-41) Post Term (>41)
Does Not Meet Meets Exceeds X2=972.95;df=8; p.
< .0001N=354,781
23%
14% 11% 9% 10%
53% 55%52%
50% 50%
24%
31%
37%41% 39%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Extreme Premature
(<28)
Moderately Premature
(29-33)
Late Premature
(34-36)
Term (37-41) Post Term (>41)
Does Not Meet Meets ExceedsX2=1092.2df=8;
p. < .0001N=354,815
32%
19%15% 12% 13%
50%
55%52%
51% 50%
18%
26%
33%
37% 37%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Extreme Premature
(<28)
Moderately Premature
(29-33)
Late Premature
(34-36)
Term (37-41) Post Term (>41)
Does Not Meet Meets Exceeds X2=1587.5;df=8;
p. < .0001N=354,764
READING ELA MATH
AGA 340.0 329.0 338.5
SGA 333.3 323.2 330.6
310.0
315.0
320.0
325.0
330.0
335.0
340.0
345.0
Sta
nd
ard
ized
Scale
CR
CT
Sco
re
R2=.045 (p. < .05)
R2=.045 (p. < .05)
R2=.055 (p. < .05)
Covariates appearing in the model are evaluated at the following values: Mothers Age In Years = 26.11.
Standardized Scale Scores by Gestational Age
323.4
331.7
335.7
339.0 338.3
315.1
321.6
325.0
328.2 327.8
317.5
327.9
333.3
337.3 336.9
300.0
305.0
310.0
315.0
320.0
325.0
330.0
335.0
340.0
345.0
Extreme (<28)
Moderate (29-33)
Late (34-36) Term (37-41) Post Term (> 41)
CR
CT
Scal
ed
Sco
re 1
stG
rad
e
Gestational Age Category
Reading SS (n=354,815)
ELA SS (n=354,781)
MATH SS (n=354,764)
2.85
2.442.72
1.471.36 1.38
1.17 1.15 1.12 1.06 1.07 1.091
10
Extr
eme …
Mo
der
at…
Late
…
Post
…
Ad
just
ed
Od
ds
Rat
io
Gestational Age
Adjusted for maternal age at birth, maternal education, maternal race/ethnicity, child
race/ethnicity, sex of child, and year of birth
Math
Englis
h L
anguage A
rts
Readin
g
aOR for Association Of Gestational Age With Child’s 1st Grade CRCT Failure
Prematurity and Risk (odds) of CRCT Failure
Prematurity and Birthweight by Gestational Age on ELA Failure
Adjusted for maternal age at birth, maternal education, maternal race/ethnicity, child race/ethnicity, sex of child, and year of birth
aOR for Association of the Interaction Between Birthweight for Gestational Age and Prematurity on Failure of the ELA Test Only
5.43
2.45
1.611.35 1.17 1.15
0.98 1.09
0.10
1.00
10.00
Extreme (20-28)
Moderate (29-33)
Late Preterm (34-36)
Post Term (>42)
Ad
just
ed
Od
ds
Rat
ios
Gestational Age
SG
A
SG
A
SG
A
SG
A
AG
A
AG
A
AG
A
AG
A
Summary• Being born ‘preterm’ versus ‘term’ increases a first-grade child’s
risk of failure of all three components of the CRCT.
• Small for gestational age infants scored significantly lower on all three components of the CRCT.
• Being small for gestational age significantly increases a first-grade child’s risk of failure on the English Language Arts test among those born extremely, moderately, and late preterm.
Prematurity is an injury that can hurt a child for a
very long time
Not all premature infants are injured in the same
way
Like most injuries many forms of prematurity can
be prevented
• Teacher/school variables vs. maternal/infant
variables as predictor of school performance
• Factors under schools’ control
• Fairness of high stakes testing
Next Steps
• Link hospital discharge, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), and spatial data to existing data set
• Examine the impact of the neighborhood on maternal child health and academic achievement
• Obtain earlier and more relevant measures of development
Attention Cornhusker Nation