preparation and properties of alkaline functionalized carbon nanotubes reinforced polyurethane...
TRANSCRIPT
Fibers and Polymers 2013, Vol.14, No.4, 571-577
571
Preparation and Properties of Alkaline Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes
Reinforced Polyurethane Composites
Jingrong Wang1*, Haiping Xu, Dandan Yang, and Yihua Wu
School of Urban Development and Environmental Engineering, Shanghai Second Polytechnic University,
Shanghai 201209, P.R. China
(Received March 26, 2012; Revised August 24, 2012; Accepted September 7, 2012)
Abstract: Composites consisting of polyurethane (PU)/carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have been successfully prepared bysolution mixing method. CNTs were modified through mechano-chemical reaction to increase the compatibility with PU viahydrogen bondings. SEM microphotographs proved that modified CNTs (M-CNTs) became shorter and FTIR spectrashowed that hydroxyl groups had been introduced to the surface of M-CNTs. SEM images of PU/M-CNTs composites alsoproved that M-CNTs were effectively dispersed in PU matrix. Mechanical property tests showed that addition of M-CNTscould significantly improve the tensile properties of PU/M-CNTs composite (breaking strength enhancement ratio forcomposite with 5.0 wt% M-CNTs was 103.81 %). The thermal stability of composites with M-CNTs was also improved. Theinitial degradation temperature enhancement was 19.9 oC for the composite with 0.5 wt% M-CNTs. Electrical property testsshowed that the electrical properties were improved by adding M-CNTs. The volume conductivities increased 3 and 5 ordersof magnitude for the composites with 5.0 wt% and 10 wt% M-CNTs, respectively. The addition of M-CNTs had little effecton the elastic properties of the composites.
Keywords: Composite, Carbon nanotubes, Mechano-chemical reaction, Polyurethane
Introduction
Carbon nanotube (CNTs) is a kind of nano-material with
high thermal stability, exceptional mechanical and electrical
property, etc [1-3]. The most important is that the molecular
structure of CNTs is very similar to the polymeric chains of
polymer. CNTs’ flexility is also excellent and they have
good compatibility with polymer. Therefore, one of the most
attractive applications is to incorporate CNTs into polymer
matrix to prepare high performance composites [4]. CNTs
are considered to be the most promising candidates as ideal
fillers to improve mechanical properties, thermal stability,
and electrical conductivity of composites [5-8].
Polyurethane (PU) is an important class of polymer materials
for a variety of applications due to its useful properties such
as fine flexibility, elasticity and damping ability. Nevertheless,
some properties such as thermal stability, electrical and
electrical conductivity, etc, could be improved with the addition
of CNTs. In order to combine the excellent properties of
CNTs and PU, PU/CNTs composites have been intensively
studied [9-12].
However, the intrinsic van der Waals attraction among
CNTs, in combination with their high surface area and high
aspect ratio, often leads to significant agglomeration, thus
hindering the development of homogeneous composites and
preventing efficient transfer of their superior properties to
polymer matrix [13]. Chemical oxidation under ultrasonication
or reflux conditions using mixtures of strong acids has been
shown to be very effective in modifying CNTs. After treatment,
CNTs’ dispersity and the properties of composites can be
improved [14,15]. Sahoo et al. [16] treated CNTs in a mixture
of concentrated H2SO4/HNO3 and prepared PU nano-
composites. They reported the tensile strength of the composite
(2.5 wt% of CNTs) was improved by 37 % compared with
pure PU. But author’s previous research also showed that the
acid treated CNTs were still very long and long CNTs
aggregated seriously in the matrix [17]. Chen et al. [18]
reported a mechano-chemical reaction method to functionalize
the CNTs and the resulted CNTs were further cut into short
ones by mechanical milling technology. Wang et al. [19]
prepared palmitic acid based composite with CNTs under
such treatment. They found that CNTs had been dispersed
well in PA matrix and the enhancement of the thermal
conductivity was about 30 % higher than that of the similar
composite containing CNTs treated by concentrated acid
mixture. However, other properties of the composites were
not shown in this paper.
In the present work, mechano-chemical reaction via
alkaline was employed to treat the pristine CNTs which have
poor dispersibility. PU/CNTs composites were prepared by
solution mixing method. The effects of modified CNTs on
the mechanical, thermal, electrical, and elastic recovery
properties were also studied.
Experimental
Materials
Pristine CNTs (P-CNTs) were commercially supplied by
Chengdu Organic Chemicals Co., Ltd., Chinese Academy of
Sciences. The purity, diameter and average length of the P-
CNTs were 95 wt%, 10-20 nm and 50 um respectively.
Diphenyl methane-4,4’-diisocyanate (MDI) and polytetra-*Corresponding author: [email protected]
DOI 10.1007/s12221-013-0571-z
572 Fibers and Polymers 2013, Vol.14, No.4 Jingrong Wang et al.
hydrofuran (PTHF, MW=2000 g/mol) were received from
BASF Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. Potassium hydroxide
(KOH), 1,4-butanediol (BD), and N,N-dimethylacetamide
(DMAc) were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent
Co., Ltd., China.
Modification of P-CNTs
The mechano-chemical reaction treatment described in
Pan et al. [20] was applied to modify P-CNTs to enhance the
CNTs’ dispersibility. In a typical treatment, 1 g of P-CNTs
was mixed with 20 g of potassium hydroxide and the
mixture was ball-milled for 20 h as the rotating rate was
250 r/min. Then, the sample was washed by distilled water
and filtered. The processing was repeated until the used
water became neutral to ensure a complete removal of
potassium hydroxide residues, if any. Modified CNTs (M-
CNTs) were collected and dried at 100oC for 24 h to remove
the distilled water.
Preparation of the Composites
Pure PU was synthesized from its monomers, MDI and
PTHF, in a two-step process using BD as a chain extender. A
mole ratio of 3:1:2 of MDI:PTHF:BD was used, indicating
32 wt% of hard segment content. Here, MDI and BD acted
as hard segment in PU.
For the fabrication of PU/M-CNTs composite films, the
solution mixing method was adopted and the following
procedure was used: the necessary weight fraction of M-
CNTs was first dispersed in DMAC by sonication at room
temperature for 1.5 h using an ultrasonic homogenizer.
Thereafter, PU was added into this solution and the mixture
was stirred for 1.5 h. The mixture was then cast onto a clean
Teflon disk and dried completely in an oven. Free-standing
PU/M-CNTs composite film whose thickness was about
0.2 mm was obtained by peeling it from the disk. In the
composites, the weight ratios of M-CNTs were 0.5 %, 1 %,
5 % and 10 %, respectively. As a control, a pure PU film was
obtained using the same casting process.
Characterization
Scanning electron microscopy (Hitachi S-4800, Japan)
was conducted to observe the micro structure of CNTs and
the surfaces of PU and PU/M-CNTs composites which had
been fractured in liquid nitrogen. FTIR spectra were
recorded with spectrometer (Bruker V70, German) from
4,000 cm-1 to 400 cm-1 with a resolution of 2 cm-1.
Tensile tests were carried out on the universal material
testing machine (WDW3020, China). The specimens used
were dumb-bell samples with the length×width being 50×
5 mm and the thickness was measured by a micrometer. The
gauge length and strain rate were 10 mm and 50 mm/min,
respectively.
Thermogravimetric analysis was performed on a thermo
gravimetric-differential scanning calorimetry analyzer
(STA-449C Jupiter, Germany) heated from 35 to 700 oC at a
heating rate of 10oC/min in nitrogen.
The resistance of the specimen was measured by high
resistance tester (6517A, America). The diameter of the
sample was 10 mm. The volume conductivity was calculated
using the following equation:
In this equation, R, D and d indicates the resistance,
diameter and thickness of the sample, respectively.
The elastic recovery ratios were measured by a self-made
clamp. The samples were rectangular strips and the length
and width of the test specimens were 100 and 2 mm,
respectively. The sample was stretched to 300 %. After
being kept for 1 min, the sample was relaxed for 3 min and
the length of sample was measured. The elastic recovery
ratio was calculated using the following equation:
Elastic recovery ratio=(L1−L2)/(L1−L0) ×100 %
In this equation, L0 indicates the clamping length, L1
indicates the length after elongation and L2 indicates the
length after relaxation.
Results and Discussion
Characterization of M-CNTs
Figure 1 shows the scanning electronic microscope (SEM)
images of P-CNTs and M-CNTs. It is observed from Figure
1(a) that P-CNTs are very long and entangled with each
other. In comparison with the P-CNTs, M-CNTs which have
been cut into several hundred nanometers in length look
shorter and most of them are unentangled as shown in Figure
ρv
πD2R
4d-------------=
Figure 1. SEM images of P-CNTs (a) and M-CNTs (b).
Properties of PU/M-CNTs Composites Fibers and Polymers 2013, Vol.14, No.4 573
1(b). Compared with other modification method such as acid
oxidation method, the length of M-CNTs also became much
shorter after mechano-chemical treatment [16]. It indicates
that mechano-chemical reaction has obvious effect on the
micro-morphology of CNTs.
The chemical structures of P-CNTs and M-CNTs were
studied by micro-FTIR spectroscopy. As can be seen in
Figure 2, M-CNTs show a remarkably different FTIR
spectrum from that of P-CNTs. Consistent with previously
reported data [20,21], no detectable transmission band is
observed for P-CNTs in the wavenumber range covered in
this study. In contrast, the corresponding FTIR spectrum for
M-CNTs shows a very broad transmission band centered at
3,430 cm-1, characteristic of hydrogen bonded -OH. The
absorption peak at 1,170 cm-1 is corresponding to the stretching
band of C-O, while the peak at 1,372 cm-1 can be interpreted
to the bending stretching band of hydroxyl groups. The
strong transmission peak at about 1,580 cm-1 can be attributed
to the vibration of CNTs’ carbon skeleton and the peak at
1,625 cm-1 is assigned to the stretching mode of -C=C- in an
enol form [9,22]. It indicates that the -OH groups have been
introduced onto the M-CNTs’ surface.
As solution mixing method would be employed to prepare
PU/CNTs composite, the dispersion stability of P-CNTs and
M-CNTs in the solvent-DMAc was examined. The P-CNTs
and M-CNTs were respectively dispersed in DMAc under
ultrasonic condition for 2 h and then kept standing for a
certain period of time. The sediment of P-CNTs was observed
in half an hour while M-CNTs had good dispersion stability
after 15 days as shown in Figure 3. It indicates that the
hydroxyl groups on M-CNTs’ surface can improve the
interaction with the solvent. This provides a basis for preparation
of PU/CNTs composites through solution mixing method in
the presence of M-CNTs.
Characterization of PU and PU/M-CNTs Composite
Figure 4 shows the SEM images of PU and PU/M-CNTs
composites containing 5 and 10 wt% M-CNTs, respectively.
From the SEM images, M-CNTs’ dispersion in the polymer
matrix can be clearly observed with low magnification.
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of P-CNTs and M-CNTs.
Figure 3. Dispersion stability of CNTs in solvent-DMA; (a) P-
CNTs kept standing for 30 min and (b) M-CNTs kept standing for
15 days.
Figure 4. SEM images of PU and PU/M-CNTs composite with
different weight ratios of M-CNTs; (a) PU, (b) PU/5%M-CNTs,
and (c) PU/10%M-CNTs.
574 Fibers and Polymers 2013, Vol.14, No.4 Jingrong Wang et al.
Figure 4(a) represents PU matrix having no any filler. From
Figure 4(b), it can be seen that M-CNTs are uniformly
dispersed in the polymer matrix in which 5 wt% M-CNTs
were added. It is important that all of the M-CNTs are
individual and there are no entanglements and agglomerations.
As the weight ratio of M-CNTs is increased to 10 %,
individual M-CNTs also can be clearly discerned and only a
small cluster is found in the composite as shown in Figure
4(c).
The FTIR of PU and PU/M-CNTs composite containing
5 wt% M-CNTs are also shown in Figure 5. It can be seen
from Figure 5 that FTIR spectra of these two materials are
very similar and there are no new bands appearing. But from
the magnified inset, we can see that the peak intensity at
1,700 cm-1 of the PU/M-CNTs composite is much stronger
than that of PU as the peak intensity at 1,730 cm-1 are close.
According to the reference, the band centered at around
1,700 cm-1 is assigned to hydrogen-bonded urethane carbonyl
groups while the band at 1,730 cm-1 is attributed to free
urethane carbonyl groups [23,24]. It indicates that solution
mixing method doesn’t change the chemical structure of the
composite, but increases the amount of the hydrogen bondings.
The increased hydrogen bondings may be formed by the
physical adhesion between the -OH group of M-CNTs and
>C=O group of the PU matrix and enhance the interfacial
interaction between the surface of M-CNTs with the hard
segment of PU. The increased hydrogen bonding degree of
composite would help improve microphase separation structures
within PU matrix and enhance the material properties of PU/
M-CNT composite as follows [25].
Properties of PU and PU/M-CNTs Composites
As PU is a kind of self-strengthened material, normal
fillers have no effect on its’ tensile strength. Nevertheless,
CNTs can increase the mechanical properties of the composites.
Figure 6 presents the stress-strain curves of PU and PU/M-
CNTs composites with different weight ratios of M-CNTs. It
is clearly observed that the breaking strength of the
composites is increased compared to the corresponding value
of PU. There are two reasons to explain the phenomenon.
One is that the CNTs’ theoretical strength is up to 10 GPa
which is 100 times higher than steel’s. The other one is that
the M-CNTs which contain many hydroxyl groups form
hydrogen bondings with urethane carboxyl groups. The
hydroxyl groups can transfer the outer energy to M-CNTs
and thus the composites can make use of the high mechanical
property of M-CNTs. Figure 6 also shows that the breaking
elongation of the samples is lower in the presence of M-
CNTs, which is probably because that the M-CNTs in the
matrix easily become the stress concentration points [26].
The breaking elongation of the composite with 10 wt% M-
CNTs is mostly decreased, but it is still higher than 550 %
and this value remains in the range of high elongation-at-
break.
In order to show clearly the effect for the mechanical
property with adding M-CNTs to PU, the breaking strength
enhancement ratios of the PU/M-CNTs composites have
also been calculated as shown in Figure 7. kc and k0 represent
the breaking strength of composite and PU, respectively.
(kc−k0)/k0 is breaking strength enhancement ratio of the
composite. It indicates that the breaking strength enhancement
ratios of the PU/M-CNTs composites firstly increase then
decrease with the mass fractions of the M-CNTs. For
example, the breaking strength enhancement ratio is 103.81 %
for the composite with 5 wt% M-CNTs while it is 70.17 %
for the composite containing 10 wt% M-CNTs. It indicates
that the M-CNTs can improve the composites’ mechanical
properties, but the degree of improvement is limited. It can
be explained from the distribution of M-CNTs in the matrix.
From the images of the composites as shown in Figure 4, all
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of PU and PU/M-CNTs composite
containing 5 wt% M-CNTs.
Figure 6. Stress-strain profiles of PU and PU/M-CNTs composites
with different weight ratios of M-CNTs.
Properties of PU/M-CNTs Composites Fibers and Polymers 2013, Vol.14, No.4 575
of the M-CNTs are individual and dispersed evenly in the
matrix for the composite containing 5 wt% M-CNTs while
there is a small cluster in local matrix for the composite
containing 10 wt% M-CNTs. The agglomerates may reduce
the reinforcing effect of the M-CNTs as they are acting as
flaws in the matrix. The result has shown that the mechanical
properties of the composites are not only affected by the
amount of M-CNTs in polymer matrix, but also affected by
dispersion degree [16].
In our previous study, we prepared PU/CNTs composite in
which the pristine CNTs were pretreated by chemical
oxidation based on a concentrated acid mixture and the
CNTs mass fraction is 5 % [27]. Here we present the
mechanical property of the composite from Wang et al.
together with the measured data in this study. It is obvious
that the prepared PU/M-CNTs composites in this study have
much higher breaking strength than the composite described
in Wang et al. For example, the breaking strength enhancement
ratio for the prepared PU/M-CNTs composite containing
5 wt% M-CNTs in this study is 103.81 % while it is only
8.8 % for the composite containing the same amount CNTs
described in Wang et al. The marked discrepancy in the
breaking strength enhancement in these two composites
might be ascribed to the different length of the CNTs. As we
know that carboxylic acid groups are generated during the
acid treatment, which can enhance the dispersity of the
CNTs in the organic solvent, but the treatment has little
effect on the length of CNTs. Longer CNTs are easily
entangled with each other and agglomerated especially
during the solvent evaporation.
All polymers have a certain limit of service temperatures.
Improving the thermal stability can widen their application
areas. Figure 8 presents the thermal degradation behavior of
PU/M-CNTs composites with different M-CNTs contents.
Table 1 shows the initial degradation temperatures and the
residue ratios at 700oC of the samples. From Figure 8 and
Table 1, we can see that the initial degradation temperature is
increased. When M-CNTs content is 0.5 wt%, the initial
degradation temperature can be enhanced by 19.9 oC (from
280.8 to 300.7oC). It indicates that adding M-CNTs can
improve the composites’ thermal stability. The improvement
of the composites’ thermal stability might be attributed to
the hydroxyl bondings of the composites and the CNTs
themselves whose thermal stability can be up to 2800oC in
vacuum. Table 1 also indicates that the weight retention of
the composites at 700oC increases with the increase of M-
CNTs’ weight ratios. It is because that the M-CNTs can not
be decomposed at 700 oC. It is also observed that weight
retention is a little more than the theoretically retention. It is
probably because that some macromolecular segment may
enter the opened tubes of the cut M-CNTs or entangled
around the M-CNTs’ surface and such segments may have
been retained in the residue.
The effect of the weight ratios of M-CNTs on the electrical
properties of the composites is shown in Table 2. From the
table, we can see that the volume conductivities of the
composites increase with the increase of the weight ratios of
Figure 7. Breaking strength enhancement ratios of PU/M-CNTs
composites with different weight ratios of M-CNTs.
Figure 8. Thermal degradation curves of PU and PU/M-CNTs
composites with different weight ratios of M-CNTs.
Table 1. Initial degradation temperatures and weight retention at
700 oC of PU/M-CNTs composites with different weight ratios of
M-CNTs
Weight ratio of
M-CNTs (%)
Initial degradation
temperature (oC)
Weight retention at
700 oC (%)
0 280.8 5.51
0.5 300.7 7.57
1 300.7 9.15
5 295.7 12.98
10 300.7 18.70
576 Fibers and Polymers 2013, Vol.14, No.4 Jingrong Wang et al.
the M-CNTs. As the weight ratios of the M-CNTs are 5 %
and 10 %, the volume conductivities increase 3 and 5 order
of magnitude, respectively. It is concluded that M-CNTs can
improve the composites’ electrical properties. It is probably
because that CNTs have better electrical conductivity than
copper as well as they have excellent compatibility with
polymer. Therefore, comparing with other inorganic fillers,
the electrical property of polymer with less CNTs can be
improved largely.
The elastic recovery ratios of PU and PU/M-CNTs
composites including different amounts of M-CNTs were
measured as the samples were stretched 300 % for 1 min.
The results are shown in Table 3 and we can see that all of
the elastic recovery ratios are more than 95 %. It indicates
that the M-CNTs have little effect on the composites’
application.
Conclusion
After modified by mechano-chemical reaction, CNTs
become shorter and are added hydroxyl groups onto their
surface. PU/M-CNTs composites were prepared by solution
method. M-CNTs can be well dispersed in the matrix as well
as hydrogen bondings have been formed in the composites.
M-CNTs have remarkable effect on the mechanical properties
of the composites (103.81 % in breaking strength enhancement
ratio for the composite with 5.0 wt% M-CNTs). Thermal
property tests show that adding M-CNTs improves the
composites’ thermal stability (the initial degradation temperature
is increased by 19.9oC when content of M-CNTs is 0.5 wt%).
M-CNTs can also increase the composites’ electrical properties
and have little effect on the elastic properties of the
composites.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by Leading Academic
Discipline Project of Shanghai Municipal Education
Commission (J51803), Basic Key Research Programs of
Science and Technology Commission Foundation of Shanghai
City (09JC1406700), Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai
(11ZR141350), National Natural Science Foundation of
China (51207085) and Innovation Key Program of Shanghai
Municipal Education Commission (13ZZ140).
References
1. E. T. Thostenson, Z. Ren, and T. Chou, Compos. Sci.
Technol., 61, 1899 (2001).
2. R. Haggenmueller, H. H. Gommans, A. G. Rinzler, J. E.
Fischer, and K. I. Winey, Chem. Phys. Lett., 330, 219
(2000).
3. H. H. Gommans, J. W. Alldredge, H. Tashiro, J. Park, J.
Magnuson, and A. G. Rinzler, J. Appl. Phys., 88, 2509
(2000).
4. H. J. Barraza, F. Pompeo, E. A. O’Rear, and D. E. Resasco,
Nano. Lett., 2, 797 (2002).
5. T. E. Chang, A. Kisliuk, S. M. Rhodes, W. J. Brittain, and
A. P. Sokolov, Polymer, 47, 7740 (2006).
6. S. P. Sharma and S. C. Lakkad, Compos. A, 42, 8 (2011).
7. J. Yang, X. Wang, X. Wang, R. Jia, and J. Huang, J. Phys.
Chem. Solid., 71, 448 (2010).
8. B. J. Kim, K. M. Bae, M. K. Seo, K. H. An, and S. J. Park,
Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 528, 4953 (2011).
9. J. Xiong, Z. Zheng, X. Qin, M. Li, H. Li, and X. Wang,
Carbon, 44, 2701 (2006).
10. R. Zhang, D. Alice, D. Hua, B. Mark, and P. Ton, Compos.
Sci. Technol., 69, 1499 (2009).
11. W. Li and W. Bauhofer, Carbon, 49, 3891 (2011).
12. M. Raja, A. M. Shanmugharaj, S. H. Ryu, and J. Subha,
Mater. Chem. Phys., 129, 925 (2011).
13. H. M. Duong, D. V. Papavassiliou, K. J. Mullen, B. L.
Wardle, and S. Maruyama, J. Phys. Chem. C, 112, 19860
(2008).
14. Y. C. Jung, H. J. Yoo, Y. A. Kim, J. W. Cho, and M. Endo,
Carbon, 48, 1598 (2010).
15. B. F. Arlas, U. Khan, L. Rueda, J. N. Coleman, I.
Mondragon, M. A. Corcuera, and A. Eceiza, Compos. Sci.
Technol., 71, 1030 (2011).
16. N. G. Sahoo, Y. C. Jung, H. J. Yoo, and J. W. Cho, Compos.
Sci. Technol., 67, 1920 (2007).
17. H. Huang, C. H. Liu, Y. Wu, and S. Fan, Adv. Mater., 17,
1652 (2005).
18. L. Chen and H. Xie, Thermochim. Acta, 497, 67 (2010).
19. J. Wang, H. Xie, Z. Xin, Y. Li, and L. Chen, Sol. Energy,
84, 339 (2010).
20. H. Pan, L. Liu, Z. Guo, L. Dai, F. Zhang, D. Zhu, R.
Table 2. Electrical properties of PU/M-CNTs composites with
different weight ratios of M-CNTs
Weight ratio of M-CNTs (%) Volume conductivity (S/cm)
0 9.0×10-11
0.5 8.9×10-10
1 2.3×10-9
5 2.1×10-8
10 1.2×10-6
Table 3. Elastic recovery ratios of PU/M-CNTs composites with
different weight ratios of M-CNTs
Weight ratio of M-CNTs (%) Elastic recovery ratio (%)
0 96.09
0.5 96.07
1 95.97
5 95.68
10 95.28
Properties of PU/M-CNTs Composites Fibers and Polymers 2013, Vol.14, No.4 577
Czerw, and D. L. Carroll, Nano. Lett., 3, 29 (2003).
21. A. Koshio, M. Yudasaka, M. Zhang, and S. Iijima, Nano
Lett., 1, 361 (2001).
22. J. Wang, H. Xie, Z. Xin, and Y. Li, Carbon, 48, 3979
(2010).
23. L. S. Teo, C. Y. Chen, and J. F. Kuo, Macromol., 30, 1793
(1997).
24. L. Bistri i , G. Baranovi , M. Leskovac, and E. G. Bajsi ,
Eur. Polym. J., 46, 1975 (2010).
25. A. K. Barick and D. K. Tripathy, Mater. Sci. Eng., B, 176,
1435 (2011).
26. M. Zhu, T. Xiao, W. Zheng, B. Wei, Y. Wang, and P. Wu,
Chin. J. Mater Res., 26, 191 (2012).
27. J. R. Wang and H. Q. Xie, Fiber Reinfor. Plast. Compos.,
6, 35 (2009).
c
ê
cé cé cé