preparation of nanometer magnesia and its properties for fluoride removal
DESCRIPTION
Huifang Zhou, Wen Chen, Xianghui Zhang, Dan ShiTRANSCRIPT
- 97 -
http://www.ivypub.org/fes
Frontier of Environmental Science September 2014, Volume 3, Issue 3, PP.97-108
Preparation of Nanometer Magnesia and Its Properties for Fluoride Removal Huifang Zhou
1,2, Wen Chen
1,2#, Xianghui Zhang
1,2, Dan Shi
1
1. College of Materials and Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059,
China
2. Mineral Chemistry Key Laboratory of Sichuan Higher Education Institution, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
# Email: [email protected]
Abstract
Nano-MgO powders were prepared by direct chemical precipitation using polyethylene glycol (PEG 400) as dispersing agent. The
technological conditions for nano-MgO preparation were ammonia, Mg2+, PEG, reaction at 60 ℃, reaction time in 1.5 h and aging
time in 2 h, calcination at 500 ℃ after filtrating and vacuum drying. The optimum conditions for removal of fluoride are as
follows: pH range of 6.0~7.0, temperature is 25 ℃, adsorbent dosage is 20 mg/10 ml, initial concentration is 40 µg/mL, and ionic
strength is 0.1 mol/L KNO3. It was found that the nano-MgO had the largest adsorption capacity of 74 mg/g. The adsorption data
were well described by the Langmuir isotherm model and the two-constant rate equation kinetic model. According to these studies,
the nano-MgO has potential application in fluoride ions removal from water.
Keywords: Nano Magnesium; Defluorinate; Adsorption; Kinetics; Thermodynami
1 INTRODUCTION
The quality of drinking water is very important for public safety and the living quality. Excess fluoride in drinking
water causes dental, skeletal fluorosis, decreases growth and intelligence [1]. For example, skeletal fluorosis is
caused by continuous, excessive exposure to fluoride and is characterized by axial osteosclerosis, joint pain,
ligamentous ossification and fractures [2]. Fluoride enters the human body mainly through food and water intake.
Studies indicate that soluble fluoride in drinking water is the highest contributor to daily fluoride intake [3], and that
drinking water is thus the most significant source of human fluoride ingestion [4]. High fluoride level in groundwater
is a worldwide problem; India and China have the highest fluorosis prevalence in humans in Asia [5]. Fluorosis is a
serious public health problem throughout most of China. In 2010 there were 41.76 million fluorosis cases in 1325
different counties, out of which 58.2 % were caused by chronic exposure to high levels of fluoride in drinking
water[6].
Yuanmou County in Yunnan Province, China, has been identified by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) as an area where endemic fluorosis caused by using groundwater high in fluoride content for drinking
purposes, prevails [7]. Therefore, it is necessary to treat fluoride-contaminated water and control the fluoride
concentration to a permissible limit, which is 1.5 mg/L in the WHO guideline [8]. And The Chinese national
guideline value for fluoride in drinking water is 1.0 mg/L.
Compared with the common defluoridation methods, adsorption which is simple, high-efficiency, versatile and
economical is regarded as the most appropriate method [9]. It is reported that many adsorbents have been used in
defluoridation. Synthetic and biomass materials such as different types of aluminas [10], aluminum fluoride
complexation [11], Zr(IV)-loaded GP gel [12], stilbite zeolite modified with Fe(III) [13], Mg–Al–Fe [14], hydrous
zirconium oxide [15] , granular ceramic adsorption [16], Hydrous bismuth oxides (HBOs) [17], bauxite [18], Zr(IV)–
ethylenediamine [19], Zr–Mn composite material [20], and hydroxyapatite [21] .
These adsorbents have shown a certain degree of fluoride adsorption capacity but some of them can only be used in a
narrow pH range (5~6) and some of them are too expensive to be considered for full-scale water treatments.
- 98 -
http://www.ivypub.org/fes
Recently, considering their large specific area and great mass transfer efficiency, nanosized materials, such as
zirconium-loaded garlic peel [22], nano-goethite [23], CeO2-ZrO2 nanocages [24], polypyrrole/Fe3O4 magnetic
nanocomposite [25], Fe-Ti oxide nano-adsorbent [26], cellulose/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites [27], Fe-Al-Ce
nano-adsorbent [28], Fe3O4/Al2O3 nanoparticles [29] have been developed for effective removal of fluoride. The use
of nanoparticles in water treatment, however, is limited by the costly synthetic process , separation process.
Furthermore, some of them need a high temperature; interfering with coexisting ion and resulting in a supplementary
difficulty in eliminating residual chemicals in excess bring about secondary pollution.
MgO is avirulence and magnesium resources rich in China, not only exists in sea water, bittern, Well Brine etc liquid
resources, but also is very rich with magnesite, dolomite, brucite, serpentine etc natural mineral resources, these
provide a solid resource advantage for magnesium oxide adsorbent products. And China’s energy is abundant and
low-cost, providing a guarantee for production dedicated magnesia material. Thus, nano-MgO has a high potential to
be applied in adsorption systems.
Up to now, A few scholars had done some researches of active magnesium oxide for removal of fluoride. These
include conditions of active magnesium oxide for defluorination [30], Preparation of activated magnesium oxide
defluorination adsorbents by microwave radiation method [31], fluorine removal of fluorine-containing mineral
spring water [32]. However, active magnesium oxide is no match for nano-Mgo which has a larger specific surface
area. The study indicated that nano-MgO be able to achieve an adsorption capacity of 20.66 mg /g [33]. Now nano-
MgO’s application in thick films of Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 [34], removal of phosphate and nitrate from aqueous solutions
were investigated [35]. There were no literature reported the kinetics and thermodynamics of the F- adsorption on
nano-MgO in drinking water. It is an important part of the explanation nano-MgO adsorption mechanism, which is
crucial to further research and its application.
In this study, nano-MgO(100 nm) was obtained by high temperature calcination. The optimum removal of fluoride
ions on nano-MgO was evaluated. For this, batch and continuous mode sorption experiments were conducted by
using nano-MgO as the sorbent. Attempts have also been made to learn the adsorption kinetics and thermodynamics
of adsorption.
2 EXPERIMENTAL
2.1 Materials
PEG 400, NaOH, HCl, MgCl2 • 6H2O and absolute ethanol used were analytical grade. A stock solution (500.0
µg/mL) was prepared by dissolving 0.5525 g NaF (analytical grade, obtained after forging at 2 h in the temperature
range of 120 ℃) in 500 ml of distilled water. All the solutions for fluoride removal experiments and analysis were
prepared by an appropriate dilution from the stock solution.
2.2 Synthesis of Nano-Mgo Procedure
10.17 g MgCl2 • 6H2O and 13.7 mL PEG 400 (30 % mass of magnesium chloride) was dissolved in 50 mL of
absolute ethanol. 15 ml ammonia solution-ethanol (1:1) solution (with MgCl2 ratio of 2:1) was slowly added into the
mixed solution until the solution was heating to 60 ℃. Adding at a rate of one drop per second with continuous
magnetic stirring, then white precipitate formed. The solution keeps thermal insulation at 60 ℃ for 1.5 h. Then the
solution becomes ageing at room temperature for 2 h. The precipitate formed was in vacuum drying at 60 ℃ at the
end of the precipitate was separated by filter. This was followed by repeated washing with distilled water and ethanol.
The nano-MgO was calcined at 500 ℃ for 1.5 h, and then the nano-MgOs were obtained. The synthesis reaction
equations may be expressed by:
Mg2+
+2OH-=Mg(OH)2↓ (1)
Mg(OH)2=MgO+H2O (2)
2.3 Characterization of Nano-Mgo Precursor
A NETZSCH STA409PC simultaneous thermal analyzer was used for thermogravimetry (TG) and differential
- 99 -
http://www.ivypub.org/fes
thermal analysis (DTA) with different scanning rates (5, 10, 15, 20 K/min) from 30 to 1100 ℃. An alumina crucible
container was used in air. The gas flow rate was 30 ml/min. Sample weight was around 12 mg. The decomposition
product was collected at the temperature that was shown on the DTA-TG curves. Prior to experiments, temperature
calibration was performed. All experiments were performed twice to show the reproducibility. The thermokinetic
calculation was conducted with the help of NETZSCH thermokinetic software, using the detected TG data.
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of each sample were obtained from random mounts using a Rigaku D/MAX-
ШC powder diffractometer. The X-ray generator is equipped with a Ni filter and generates a beam of CuKa radiation
(λ=0.15418 nm). The operational settings for all the XRD scans are voltage: 40 kV, current: 30 mA, range: 5< 2θ
<70°, scanning speed: 0.6°/s.
Morphology of the samples was determined by scanning electron microscope (SEM) with S-3000N (Hitachi, Japan).
2.4 Determination of Fluoride Adsorption Capacity
10 ml 40 µg/mL fluoride solutions were added separately into 50 ml plastic pipe, with KNO3 as the background
electrolyte in a concentration of 0.1 mol/L, The solid-liquid ratio is 1:500 g/mL. The pH of the test solution was kept
at 6.0~7.0 by titrating with 2.0 mol/L HCl or 1.0 mol/L NaOH solution. The test solution was shaken at 25 ℃ for 0.5
h and standing for 24 h during the adsorption test. The blank control should be measured using 10 ml distilled water.
After adsorption, the solutions were filtered and the filtrate was analyzed. The fluoride ion concentration remaining
in the filtrate was measured with a JP-303 polarograph. The second order derivative linear sweep voltammetric peak
currents (ip〞) were recorded in the potential range from −0.30 V to −1.30 V (vs. SCE) at room temperature,
scanning rate and standing time was 500 mvs and 8 s respectively.
The adsorption capacity Q (µg/g); and fluoride removal efficiency P (%) was calculated from the mass balance
equation respective presented by:
Q=[(C0-C)/m]V (3)
P=[(C0-C)/C0]100% (4)
where C0 (µg/mL) is the initial fluoride concentrat ion and C (g/mL) is the final fluoride concentration after
adsorption, V is the volume of the solution containing fluoride ions, and m is the adsorbent granules dose of 20
mg/10 mL.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1 Thermal Decomposition Process of As-Prepared Products
1250
250
500
1000
0
750
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
(a)
Inte
nsi
ty (
Cou
nts
)
2-Theta (°)
(b)
FIG. 1 XRD PATTERN AND SEM PHOTO OF THE AS-PREPARED PRODUCTS:
(a) XRD PATTERN; (b) SEM IMAGE
- 100 -
http://www.ivypub.org/fes
The XRD patterns and SEM image of the as-prepared products were given in Fig.1. The XRD pattern shows that all
the diffraction peaks in the pattern are in agreement with those of the hexagonal type of Mg(OH)2 with space group
Pmp21(18) and lattice constants a= 3.144Å, b= 3.144 Å,c=4.777Å (standard card JCPD No. 44-1482). No
diffraction peaks of impurities are observed. Hence the single phase Mg(OH)2 is prepared successfully.
The SEM image (Fig.1b) shows that the Mg(OH)2 particles are uniform, consisting of plane-like grains.
Fig.2 shows the DTA-TG-DTG curves of the as-prepared products at a heating rate of 10 K/min in air below
1000 ℃. The thermal decomposition of the as-prepared products occurs in three steps in concordance with the DTG
peaks, and all steps are endothermic reaction.
The first step is from 80 to 220 ℃( Tmax=116.9 ℃ , WL=2.44%) and The second step is from 202 to 400 ℃
(Tmax=373.6 ℃, WL=31.58%), respectively, attributed for the evaporation of adsorbed water and hydroxide of the
magnesium and the formation of magnesium oxide. But the whole weight loss is 34.03%, higher than the theoretical
value (31.03%). we attempted to explain this due to the reason that the loss of the water of crystallization in the
magnesium hydroxide. The corresponding XRD patterns support the reaction process, a pure MgO (standard card
JCPD No.JCPD No.65-0476) is observed in Fig.3a. The SEM image (Fig. 3b) shows that the MgO particles are
uniform; consisting of sphericity-like grains about 20nm in size. Hence the nano-MgO is prepared successfully.
The third step is from 400 to 1000 ℃ (WL=0%, Tmax=779.4 ℃) without mass loss shows the phase transition process
of magnesium oxide.
FIG. 2 DTA-TG-DTG CURVES OF THE Mg(OH)2 AT A HEATING RATE of 10K/min in AIR
FIG. 3 XRD PATTERN AND SEM IMAGE OF THE AS-PREPARED NANO-MgO
(a) XRD PATTERN; (b) SEM IMAGE
30 1
0 2
0
40 5
0
6
0
70 8
0
0
(a)
2-Theta (°)
250
500
750
1000
Inte
nsi
ty (
Cou
nts
)
(b)
- 101 -
http://www.ivypub.org/fes
3.2 Fluoride Removal Studies.
1) Effect of pH and Ionic Strength
The pH of the medium is one of the important parameters that significantly affect the extent of fluoride adsorption.
Other parameters were equal to the fluoride adsorption capacity determination test. The effect of pH on fluoride
removal from aqueous solution by the nano-MgO was studied at various pH values (ranging from 4 to 9). Fig. 4
shows the adsorption capacity of fluorinion onto the nano-MgO in different pH. The nano-MgO exhibited a strong
adsorption of fluoride when the pH was 4.0. However, nano-MgO is alkaline in the water.
When the pH was 4.0, MgO has been partially dissolved, it will combine with fluorine ion in the solution of MgF2,
reduce fluorine ion concentration in the solution, showing the illusion of a large amount of adsorption. When the pH
was between 6.0 and 7.0, the nano-magnesium on fluorine adsorption capacity is high and stable. After pH 9, the
fluoride the adsorption adsorption capacity is decreased because the change in surface negative charge of the
adsorbent. removal is mainly governed by ion-exchange mechanism. So in the study, we selected the acidity between
6.0 and 7.0. The distilled water we use whose pH is between 6.0 and 7.0, so the experiments without pH adjustment.
To observe the effect of ionic strength on adsorption capacity, 0-0.5 mol/L KNO3 concentration was studied. Ionic
strength is very important variable in adsorption. Take the test solution 0.1 mL measured experimental results shown
in Fig. 5. When the ion concentration was 0.2 mol/L, the adsorption capacity of fluoride on nano-magnesium was
nearly balanced. However, in real life, the ion concentration of the solution reached a highest value of 0.1 mol/L, so
we chosen the ion concentration of 0.1 mol/L.
2) Effect of Temperature and Initial Fluoride Concentration
When other parameters were unchanged. The samples obtained at temperatures of 25℃, 35℃, and 45℃,
respectively. The adsorption rates keep balanced with the temperature changed. The adsorption rates is high when
the reaction temperature was 25℃. So the best temperature of this experiment is setting for room temperature, which
is 25 ℃.
Equal masses of nano-MgO were put into contact with solutions of different concentrations of fluoride-ion solutions
(from 10 to 60 µg/mL). Fig. 6 shows that as fluoride concentration increases, adsorbed amounts of fluoride increase
too at first. At 20 µg/mL, the adsorption reached equilibrium and the adsorption rates decreased more than 40 µg/mL.
This plateau occurs due to the saturation of active sites on the adsorbent surfaces. At low fluoride concentrations, the
ratio of surface active sites to fluoride ions is high. After the The adsorption quantity saturated, the adsorption rate is
reduced with the increase of initial fluoride concentration increase(c>40μg/mL). So the optimal initial concentration
is 40 µg/mL.
4 5 6 7 8 90
5
10
15
20
adso
rpti
on c
apac
ity
/(m
g/g)
pH
FIG. 4 EFFECT OF pH ON THE ADSORPTION
CAPACITY (THE INITIAL F− CONCENTRATION
WAS 40 µg/ml; ADSORBENT DOSAGE 20 mg/10
mL; 298 K)
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.512
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
adso
rpti
on c
apac
ity/
(mg/
g)
KNO3 concentration/(mol/L)
FIG. 5 EFFECT OF IONIC STRENGTH ON THE
ADSORPTION CAPACITY (THE pH=6.0~7.0; THE
INITIAL F− CONCENTRATION WAS 40 µg/ml;
ADSORBENT DOSAGE 20 mg/10 mL; 298 K).
- 102 -
http://www.ivypub.org/fes
3) Effect of Adsorbent Dosage
Changing adsorbent dosage from 5 mg/10 ml to 40 mg/10 ml in the solution, take the test solution 0.5 mL, measured
experimental. Fig. 7 shows the adsorption effect to flouride was increased with the increase of the amounts of nano-
MgO.
It is evident that the percent of fluoride removal increased with the increase of the adsorbent concentration which is
due to the fact that a greater amount of adsorbent provides greater number of available binding sites. When the
adsorbent dosage is 20 mg/10 ml, there were reaching a value of steady. Based on the above discussion, the
adsorbent dosage of 20 mg/10 ml was used as the optimum value for the fluoride ion adsorption experiments.
By the study of relation between single experimental factor such as solid-liquid ratio, initial concentration, initial pH
of solution, adsorption temperature and adsorption effect, the optimum adsorptive removal rate can be obtained:
adsorbent dosage = 20 mg/10 ml, pH=6.0 ~ 7.0, C0=40 mg/L, T=25 ℃, ionic strength was 0.1 mol/L. Adsorption
capacity of fluoride removal reaches 74 mg/g.
3.3 Effects of Coexisting Ions in Ground Water
Contaminated groundwater usually contains several other co-existing ions along with fluoride, which may compete
with fluoride for the active adsorption sites. Hence, it is imperative to investigate the possible interference of these
ions (HCO3−, Cl
−, NO3
−, SO4
2−, PO4
3−, Ca
2+, Mg
2+, Fe
3+ and Mn
2+) on fluoride removal by nano-MgO.
The adsorption studies were carried out in the presence of distilled water compare with ground water. This may
contain chloride, sulfate, nitrate, bicarbonate, phosphate and calcium. At an initial fluoride concentration of 20
µg/mL, the effects of these co-existing ions on fluoride removal in the ground water did not significantly affect the
removal of fluoride. Under the optimum conditions, in the distilled water, the adsorption rates is 96.53 %, and the
concentration of fluoride solution is 0.70 µg/mL by defluorinated. Regard to groundwater, the adsorption rates is
96.67 %; the concentration of fluoride solution is 0.67 µg/mL by defluorinated. All these were lower than drinking
water standard of China (1.0 µg/mL).
3.4 Adsorption behavior and possible mechanism of fluoride
Nano-MgO has smaller particle size than ordinary magnesium oxide, thus shows different surface effect which
ordinary magnesium oxide doesn’t have. Nano-MgO’s surface extremely increases when its particle size decreases,
and then making the surface adsorption sites increased greatly. The fluoride adsorption may be due to the combined
effect of both chemical and electrostatic interaction between the oxide surface and fluoride ion and also availability
of active sites on the oxide surfaces. As reported earlier, anion adsorption on metal oxide surface is through
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
adso
rpti
on
rat
e(%
)
adsorbent dosage /(mg/10 ml)
FIG..7 EFFECT of SOLID-LIQUID RATIO on THE
ADSORPTION RATE (THE INITIAL F−
CONCENTRATION WAS 40 µg/ml;
pH=6.0~7.0; 298 K).
10 20 30 40 50 6040
50
60
70
80
90
100
adso
rpti
on r
ate(
%)
initial concentration/(g/ml)
FIG.6 EFFECT of INITIAL FLUORIDE
CONCENTRATION on THE ADSORPTION RATE
(ADSORBENT DOSAGE 20 mg/10 mL;
pH=6.0~7.0; 298 K).
- 103 -
http://www.ivypub.org/fes
columbic forces and/or ligand exchange reactions, where the anions displace OH− or H2O from the surface [37]. In
our studies it was observed that the pH of the equilibrated solution slightly increased in acidic pH range, while it
slightly decreased when the initial solution was alkaline. Hence, the fluoride adsorption on nano-MgO may be due to
anion exchange at acidic pH and by van der Waals forces at alkaline pH ranges (Fig. 4). The most probable
mechanism for fluoride adsorption in acidic conditionis mainly as [38]:
MOH + H2O + F− ↔ MOH2
+ + F
− + OH
− ↔ MOH2–F + OH
−↔ MF + H2O+ OH
− (5)
3.5 Adsorption Isotherm Studies
Adsorption capacity is one of the basic parameters required for the design of any batch or fixed-bed adsorption
system. The equilibrium adsorption study of fluoride by nano-MgO was carried out at optimum adsorptive condition
which obtained above. The initial fluoride concentration was varied over a wide range from 10 µg/mL to 400 µg/mL,
in order to attain complete exhaustion of the adsorbent. The saturated adsorption capacity of fluoride on nano-MgO
powder was showed (Fig. 8).
The data obtained from this study are analyzed with the help of two isotherm models, including the well-known
Langmuir and Freundlich. The linearized form of the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm are given below.
Langmuir model:
Ce/qe = Ce/qm + 1/(KL×qm) (6)
Freundlich model:
lgqe = lgKF + 1/nlgCe (7)
where qe is the amount of solute adsorbed per unit weight of adsorbent at equilibrium (mg/g); Ce is equilibrium
concentration of the adsorbate in the solution (mg/L); qm represent maximum specific up take capacities at
equilibrium of Langmuir (mg/g); KL is the Langmuir isotherm constants (L/mg); KF is the Freundlich isotherm
constant [(mg/g) (m/g)−1/n
].
Fig. 9-10 show the Langmuir isotherm model and Freundlich isotherm model fit for fluoride sorption on the
adsorbents.
The Langmuir isotherm in its linear form is represented by:
qe =7.913Ce/ (1+0.102Ce). (8)
The Freundlich isotherm in its linear form is represented by:
qe=9.471Ce1/2.107
. (9)
FIG. 8 THE INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT INITIAL CONCENTRATION ON ADSORPTION
CAPACITY (ADSORBENT DOSAGE 20 mg/10 mL; pH=6.0~7.0; 298 K)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
q t / ( m
g / g
)
C/(μg/mL)
- 104 -
http://www.ivypub.org/fes
The Langmuir isotherm constants calculated are follows: qm=77.58, KL=0.102. The saturated adsorption capacity
depends on the quantity of adsorption activity sites, which directly related to the nano-MgO specific surface area of
the adsorbent. It is clear that the qmax of Langmuir model fitted reach to 77.58 mg/g. The Freundlich isotherm
constants calculated are follows: KF=9.471; n=2.107. It is believed to when n<0.5, the adsorption is difficult to
reaction. now n=2.107, the adsorption is an easy reaction. From Figure 9-10, Langmuir model fitted the isotherm
data well, yielding a correlation coefficient of 0.998. The adsorption of defluorination on nano-MgO obeys the
Langmuir monolayer adsorption.
The thermodynamic feasibility of the process in the present fluoride-iron oxide system was evaluated from the free
energy change following Eq. (10)
ΔG= -RT lnKd (10)
where ΔG is the change in free energy (kJ/mol); T is the absolute temperature (K); R is the universal gas constant
(8.314J/K·mol); Kd is the Langmuir isotherm constants (L/mg).
When the sorption equilibrium at studied systems is established, the fluoride adsorbed onto nano-MgO is in
equilibrium with the residual fluoride concentration remaining in the liquid phase. The value of the observed
equilibrium constants (Kd) of the adsorption process, the constants of F- distribution between the solid and liquid
phases at the equilibrium, were calculated with respect to temperature using the method of Khan and Singh,[36] by
plotting ln(qe/Ce) versus qe and extrapolating to zero qe. Kd =2.094, ΔG values was estimated at -1.83 kJ/mol. This
indicates that the adsorption process is spontaneous. From above indicated that nano-MgO is a wonderful absorbent
material for defluorination.
3.6 Adsorption Kinetic Studie
In this study, kinetics of adsorption of fluoride at various initial concentrations was carried out by using nano-MgO
as adsorbents. We chose three initial concentrations: 30 µg/mL, 100 µg/mL, and 200 µg/mL. Fig. 11 shows the time
dependence of fluoride sorption onto nano-MgO at these initial concentrations.
From Fig. 11, In the case of nano-MgO, most of sorption has taken place within 3 h of contact time. After 3 h, the
rate of adsorption was negligible and residual fluoride concentration reached almost a constant value. We can also
know that the higher initial concentration of absorption liquid, the higher equilibrium adsorption quantity is.
After the equilibrium period, the amount of adsorbed fluoride did not significantly change with time. Theoretically,
adsorption kinetics of fluoride onto solid particles is controlled by different mechanisms. These mechanisms involve
diffusion or transport of fluoride from bulk solution to exterior surface of the adsorbent particle. The rate of sorption
onto a solid surface depends upon a number of parameters such as structural properties of the sorbent, initial
concentrations of the solute, and the interaction between the solute and the active sites of the sorbent. Therefore,
FIG. 9 LANGMUIR ISOTHERM FITS FOR ADSORPTION
OF FLUORIDE ONTO NANO-MgO (INITIAL FLUORIDE
CONCENTRATIONS 40 µg/ml; ADSORBENT DOSAGE 20
mg/10 mL; pH=6.0~7.0).
0 50 100 150 200 250
0
1
2
3
4
y=0.01289x+0.1261
R2=0.9984
Ce/q
e (mg/
ml)
Ce/ (μg/ml)
FIG.10 FREUNDLICH ISOTHERM FITS FOR
ADSORPTION OF FLUORIDE ONTO NANO-MgO
(INITIAL FLUORIDE CONCENTRATIONS 40 µg/ml;
ADSORBENT DOSAGE 20 mg/10 mL; pH=6.0~7.0).
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
0.8
1.2
1.6
2.0
2.4
y=0.4746x+0.9764
R2=0.8493
logq
e
logCe
- 105 -
http://www.ivypub.org/fes
kinetics dates analyses for fluoride sorption onto nano-MgO were studied with different models. The pseudo first
order dynamic model, pseudo secondary dynamic model, banerm equation model and two-constant rate equation
models were tested to describe the kinetic process. The mathematical representations of models are given in Eqs (11),
(12), (13) and (14).
Pseudo-first-order adsorption kinetic model:
ln (qe−qt) = ln qe−k1t (11)
Pseudo-second-order adsorption kinetic model:
t/qt =1/(k2 qe2)+ t / qe (12)
banerm equation kinetic model:
ln qe/(qe-qt ) = k3 tn (13)
two-constant rate equation kinetic model:
ln qt = a+ k4 ln t (14)
where qe is the amount of solute adsorbed per unit weight of adsorbent at equilibrium (mg /g); qt is the amount of
fluoride sorbed by adsorption at time t (mg/g); k1, k2, k3, k4, a, n are the constants.
The adsorption kinetic model parameters obtained from the above equations are given (Fig. 12). From these results,
it is evident that kinetic datas of the fluoride adsorption onto nano-MgO fitted well with two-constant rate equation.
Yielding a correlation coefficient of 0.9 (Fig. 12d), this suggests that the adsorption kinetic of magnesium oxide
process is not a simple first order kinetics of reversible reaction, it is a complex reaction process, may be include
adsorption diffusion and chemical reaction process.
FIG. 11 THE TIME DEPENDENCE OF FLUORIDE SORPTION ONTO
NANO-MGO at 30 µg/ml, 100 µg/ml, 200 µg/ml INITIAL
CONCENTRATIONS
-50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
C0=100mg/ml
t/(min)
C0=30mg/ml
q t / (m
g/g)
C0=200mg/ml
- 106 -
http://www.ivypub.org/fes
3.7 The Desorption of Fluoride on Nano-MgO Adsorbent
Under the optimum conditions, the adsorptions test was done at an initial fluoride concentration of 30 µg/mL.
Separate MgO from solution after oscillating, assaying the fluoride concentration in the solution. The nano-MgO in
plastic tubes was washed with distilled water, adjusts the pH of 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and distilled water respectely,
the blank control be measured using distilled water, a total volume of 10 mL. The elution conditions: 3 hour of
shaking time and 25 ℃ temperature. The fluoride ions remaining in the test solution were measured with JP-303
Polarograph. The results show that pH has a nonsignificant influence on desorption of fluoride on nano-MgO
adsorbent. The hightest desorption rate was 0.73% in the pH of 8.0. It is also do slightly influence in distilled water.
So it can be learn that the fixation of F- by nano-MgO was the very strong. It is suitable for the fluoride adsorption
on nano-MgO, Which is hard to desorb of fluoride on nano-MgO adsorbent.
4 CONCLUSIONS
1) The calcination product of nano-MgO can be an efficient adsorbent for fluoride sequestering from water. The
optimal parameters for producing high performance adsorbent nano-MgO were at the adsorption temperature of 25
°C, a adsorbent dosage of 20 mg/10 ml, and an ionic strength of 0.1 mol/L KNO3. This nano-MgO had an adsorption
capacity for fluoride of 74 mg/g for water with an initial fluoride concentration of 40 µg/ml that was treated at pH
6.0~7.0. That is higher than usual adsorbents.
2) The adsorption process is well described by the Langmuir isotherm model and the two-constant rate equation
model, as assessed by the correlation coefficient values. This suggests that the adsorption of defluorination on nano-
MgO obeys the Langmuir monolayer adsorption; the adsorption kinetic of magnesium oxide process is not a simple
first order kinetics of reversible reaction, it is a complex reaction process, may be include adsorption diffusion and
chemical reaction process.
3) The interference of common ions in ground water is also investigated. The experiment showed that it been the
difficultly desorbed F- after adsorption. So the nano-MgO has a significant amount of potential by promising
environmental materials for fluoride removal from water.
REFERENCES
[1] Reimann, Clemens, et al. "Drinking water quality in the Ethiopian section of the East African Rift Valley I—data and health
aspects." Science of the Total Environment 311.1 (2003): 65-80.
[2] Joshi, S., et al. "Skeletal fluorosis due to excessive tea and toothpaste consumption." Osteoporosis international 22.9 (2011): 2557-
2560.
FIG. 12 KINETICS OF DIFFERENT CONCENTRATIONS F- ADSORPTION ON THE NANO-MgO (A), (B), (C)
AND (D) pH=6.0~7.0, T=25℃, I=0.1 mol/L KNO3, ADSORBENT DOSAGE 20 mg/10 mL. (A) PSEUDO-FIRST-
ORDER KINETIC; (B) PSEUDO-SECOND-ORDER KINETIC; (C) BANERM EQUATION KINETIC; (D) TWO-
CONSTANT RATE EQUATION KINETIC.
- 107 -
http://www.ivypub.org/fes
[3] De Almeida BS, Da Silva Cardoso Ve, Rabelo Buzalaf Ma, ―Fluoride ingestion from toothpaste and diet in 1-3-year-old Brazilian
children‖Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol, 2007, 35 (1): 53–63.
[4] Levy Sm, BroffiftR B, Marshall Ta, et al. ―Associations between fluorosis of permanent incisors and fluoride intake from infant
formula, other dietary sources and dentifrice during early childhood . J.Am. Dent. Assoc, 2010, 141 (10): 1190–1201.
[5] Barot, V. V. "Occurrence of endemic fluorosis in human population of North Gujarat, India: human health risk." Bulletin of
Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 61.3 (1998): 303-310.
[6] Ministry of Health of China ―China Health Statistical Yearbook 2010‖ Peking Union Medical College Press, Beijing, 2010.
[7] Chen Huafang, et al. "Spatial distribution and temporal variation of high fluoride contents in groundwater and prevalence of
fluorosis in humans in Yuanmou County, Southwest China." Journal of hazardous materials 235 (2012): 201-209.
[8] WHO (World Health Organization). ―Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality‖. First Addendum to Third Edition, 2006.
[9] Mohapatra M., et al. "Review of fluoride removal from drinking water." Journal of environmental management 91.1 (2009): 67-
77.
[10] Gong Wen-Xin, et al. "Adsorption of fluoride onto different types of aluminas." Chemical Engineering Journal 189 (2012): 126-
133.
[11] Gong Wen-Xin, et al. "Effect of aluminum fluoride complexation on fluoride removal by coagulation." Colloids and Surfaces A:
Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 395 (2012): 88-93.
[12] Deng Shubo, et al. "Mn–Ce oxide as a high-capacity adsorbent for fluoride removal from water." Journal of hazardous materials
186.2 (2011): 1360-1366.
[13] Sun You-bo, Fang Qing-hua, Dong Jun-ping, et al. Removal of fluoride from drinking water by natural stilbite zeolite modified
with Fe (III) [J]. Desalination 277(2011): 121-127.
[14] Ma Wei, et al. "Removal of fluoride ions from aqueous solution by the calcination product of Mg–Al–Fe hydrotalcite-like
compound." Desalination 268.1 (2011): 20-26.
[15] Dou Xiaomin, et al. "Remediating fluoride from water using hydrous zirconium oxide." Chemical Engineering Journal 198 (2012):
236-245.
[16] Chen Nan, et al. "Fluoride removal from water by granular ceramic adsorption." Journal of colloid and interface science 348.2
(2010): 579-584.
[17] Srivastav Arun Lal, et al. "Application of a new adsorbent for fluoride removal from aqueous solutions." Journal of hazardous
materials 263 (2013): 342-352.
[18] Sujana M. G and S. Anand. "Fluoride removal studies from contaminated ground water by using bauxite." Desalination 267.2
(2011): 222-227.
[19] Swain, S. K., et al. "Fluoride removal performance of a new hybrid sorbent of Zr (IV)–ethylenediamine." Chemical Engineering
Journal 184 (2012): 72-81.
[20] Tomar, Vaishali, Surendra Prasad, and Dinesh Kumar. "Adsorptive removal of fluoride from water samples using Zr–Mn
composite material." Microchemical Journal 111 (2013): 116-124.
[21] Jiménez-Reyes M and M. Solache-Ríos. "Sorption behavior of fluoride ions from aqueous solutions by hydroxyapatite." Journal of
hazardous materials 180.1 (2010): 297-302.
[22] Inoue Katsutoshi. "Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution onto Zr-loaded garlic peel (Zr-GP) particles." Journal of Central
South University of Technology 18.5 (2011): 1448-1453.
[23] Mohapatra, Mamata, et al. "Facile synthesis of additive-assisted nano goethite powder and its application for fluoride remediation."
Journal of Nanoparticle Research 12.2 (2010): 681-686.
[24] Wang Jing, Xu Wei-hong, Chen Liang et al. ―Excellent Fluoride Removal Performance by CeO2-ZrO2 Nanocages in Water
Environment‖ Chemical Engineering Journal 231(2013): 198-205.
[25] Bhaumik M, Leswifi T Y, Maity A, et al. ―Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution by polypyrrole/Fe3O4 magnetic
nanocomposite‖ Journal of hazardous materials 186 (2011): 150-159.
[26] Chen, Lin, et al. "Fe―Ti oxide nano-adsorbent synthesized by co-precipitation for fluoride removal from drinking water and its
adsorption mechanism." Powder Technology 227 (2012): 3-8.
[27] Yu, Xiaolin, et al. "Removal of fluoride from drinking water by cellulose@ hydroxyapatite nanocomposites." Carbohydrate
polymers 92.1 (2013): 269-275.
[28] Chen, Lin, et al. "Optimization of a Fe–Al–Ce nano-adsorbent granulation process that used spray coating in a fluidized bed for
fluoride removal from drinking water." Powder Technology 206.3 (2011): 291-296.
- 108 -
http://www.ivypub.org/fes
[29] Chai Li-yuan, Wang Yun-yan, Zhao Na et al. Sulfate-doped Fe3O4/Al2O3 nanoparticles as a novel adsorbent for fluoride removal
from drinking water." Water research 47.12 (2013): 4040-4049. Water research 2013, 47: 4040-4049
[30] Lv Yajuan, Yan Zichun, Bai Lin, ―Experimental Studies on Factors of Fluorine Ion Disposal using Active Magnesium Oxide‖
journal of gansu normal colleges (China) 15(2010): 22-24. (in Chinese)
[31] Li Zhenyu et al. "Preparation of activated magnesium oxide defluorination adsorbents by microwave radiation method [J]."
Inorganic Chemicals Industry 11 (2009): 005.
[32] Wang, Fengming and Wang Dong. "Fluorine removal of fluorine containing mineral spring water [j]." technology of water
treatment 4 (1996).
[33] Maliyekkal, Shihabudheen M., K. R. Antony, and T. Pradeep. "High yield combustion synthesis of nanomagnesia and its
application for fluoride removal." Science of the total environment 408.10 (2010): 2273-2282.
[34] Bhargava A, Alarco J A, Mackinnon I D R, et al. ―Synthesis and characterisation of nanoscale magnesium oxide powders and their
application in thick films of Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8‖ Materials Letters 34(1998): 133-142.
[35] Zhang, Ming, et al. "Synthesis of porous MgO-biochar nanocomposites for removal of phosphate and nitrate from aqueous
solutions." Chemical Engineering Journal 210 (2012): 26-32.
[36] Lyubchik, Sergei I., et al. "Kinetics and thermodynamics of the Cr (III) adsorption on the activated carbon from co-mingled
wastes." Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 242.1 (2004): 151-158.
[37] Wang Yan-xin, Reardon E J. ―Activation and regeneration of a soil sorbent for defluoridation of drinking water‖ Applied
Geochemistry16 (2001): 531-539.
[38] Sujana M G, Anand S. Iron and aluminium based mixed hydroxides: a novel sorbent for fluoride removal from aqueous
solutions[J]. Applied Surface Science 256 (2010): 6956-6962