prepared by the community service council august 2012

COMMUNITY PROFILE 2012EARLY CHILDHOOD INDICATORS OF

CREEK COUNTY

Prepared by the Community Service CouncilAugust 2012

CREEK COUNTY

Demographic Trends Economics and Employment Child Indicators

DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS

DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS

Population change--migration to suburban areas of Tulsa and Oklahoma City MSA with an overall decrease in new births

Age--aging population Race and ethnicity--more culturally

diverse Living arrangements--transitional for

family living arrangement

DE

MO

GR

AP

HIC

TR

EN

DS

Prepared by the Community Service Council

Population Trends for Total Population and Under Age 5Creek County, 1980 through 2030

Source: US Census Bureau, 1980, 1990, 2000 & 2010 Censuses; Population Estimates Program.

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020(proj)

2030(proj.)

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

Under age 5 4,676 4,432 4,587 4,385 4,604 4,834

Total population 59,395 60,915 67,367 69,967 71,917 73,148

DE

MO

GR

AP

HIC

TR

EN

DS


Population Trends and Projections by Age GroupCreek County, 1990 - 2030

Source: US Census Bureau, 1990, 2000, & 2010Censuses; US Census Bureau, Population Projections, 2000 - 2030.

6.6

6.4

6.3

6.8

7.3

18.3

17.7

18.4

20.3

20.8

7.2

7.4

8.1

8.2

8.6

45.9

49.9

52.3

51.8

50.4

19.7

16.9

13.3

11.4

11.6

2030

2020

2010

2000

1990

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Percent of population

0-4 5-17 18-24 25-64 65-84 85+

1.7

1.4

1.4

Pro

ject

ions 2.3

1.7

DE

MO

GR

AP

HIC

TR

EN

DS


Race for Total Population and Children under 18Oklahoma and Creek County, 2010

Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census.

55.9%

8.2%

10.8%

1.6%

14.3%

9.1%

68.9%

2.3%

13.4%

0.4%5.4%

9.7%

68.7%7.3%

8.2%

1.7%

8.9%

5.3%

78.4%

2.2%

9.8%

0.3%3.1%

6.3%

White Black American Indian Asian Hispanic Other/2+ races

Oklahoma

Under 18

Total Population

Creek County

N = 929,666

N = 3,751,351

N =17,263

N = 69,967

DE

MO

GR

AP

HIC

TR

EN

DS


Types of Families with Own Children Under 6by Race & Hispanic Origin

Creek County, 2010

Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census, 2010 Census Summary File

68.0% 19.4%

12.5%

70.4%

17.8%

11.8%

50.0%

34.4%

15.6%

65.3%

24.5%

10.2%

100.0%

55.1%

22.4%

22.4%

Married couple Female-headed Male-headed

Total NH White Black

American Indian Asian Hispanic

DE

MO

GR

AP

HIC

TR

EN

DS


Living Arrangements of Related Children Under 18Creek County, 1990, 2000 & 2010 Estimates

Source: US Census Bureau, 1990, 2000, & 2010 Censuses; .

Married Couple Male-headed Female-headed Other relatives0%

20%

40%

60%

80% 1990 2000 2010

1990 75.7% 5.2% 12.4% 6.7%

2000 69.6% 5.7% 15.5% 9.3%

2010 61.5% 7.7% 17.2% 13.6%

Children living with 1 or both parents

DE

MO

GR

AP

HIC

TR

EN

DS

ECONOMICS AND EMPLOYMENT

http://www.publicdomainpictures.net/view-image.php?image=10723&picture=police-helicopter&large=1

http://www.publicdomainpictures.net/view-image.php?image=4447&picture=coins&large=1

http://www.publicdomainpictures.net/view-image.php?image=485&picture=three-credit-cards&large=1


Mean Family Income by Quintile, in 2003 dollarsUnited States, 1970-2010

Source: US Census Bureau, Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2010.

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

$0

$50,000

$100,000

$150,000

$200,000

Real hourly wage (2010 dollars)

Lowest Second Middle Fourth Highest

Lowest $9,982 $10,719 $10,858 $10,849 $11,589 $11,855 $12,860 $11,900 $11,034

Second $27,039 $26,331 $27,024 $27,492 $29,158 $28,976 $32,110 $30,554 $28,636

Middle $43,540 $43,199 $44,594 $45,634 $48,161 $48,450 $53,472 $51,711 $49,309

Fourth $61,374 $62,772 $65,698 $68,643 $72,613 $74,480 $83,124 $81,334 $79,040

Highest $108,653 $110,828 $117,139 $128,221 $140,915 $155,428 $180,129 $178,230 $169,633

EC

ON

OM

IC

S &

EM

PL

OY

ME

NT


Self-Sufficiency

Wage(annual)

Poverty Guidelines

(annual)

Dollar Difference

Self-SufficiencyPercent of

Poverty

One person

$18,707 $11,170 $7,537 167%

Two persons

$31,933 $15,130 $16,803 211%

Three persons

$36,605 $19,090 $17,515 192%

Four persons

$45,015 $23,050 $21,965 195%

Comparison of Self-Sufficiency Wage to Poverty Guidelines, by Size of Family

Creek County, 2012

($8.86 per hour)

($15.12 per hour)

($17.33 per hour)

($10.66 per hour per adult)

Notes: For the self-sufficiency wages shown in table, family of two consists of one adult and one preschooler; family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child; family of four consists of two adults, one preschooler and one schoolage child. Hourly wages given assume full-time, year-round employment.

($5.29 per hour)

($7.16 per hour)

($9.04 per hour)

($5.46 per hour per adult)

Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma 2009; 2012 HHS Poverty Guidelines, Federal Register, Vol. 77, No. 13, January 26, 2012, p. 3637-3638. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Mar. 2012.

EC

ON

OM

IC

S &

EM

PL

OY

ME

NT


Family of Three, Creek County, 2012

$64,179

$49,967

$39,125

$10,800$15,312

$19,090

$35,317

$16,607

WelfareWage

MinimumWage

PovertyWage

185% PovertyWage

EstimatedMedian Family

Income*(2006-10 ACS)

$0

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

$60,000

$70,000Annual Wage

Self-Sufficiency Wage = $36,605($17.33/hr)

Comparison of Wages: Self-Sufficiency, Welfare, Minimum, Poverty, 185% of Poverty, and Median Family Income

($5.12/hr) ($7.25/hr) ($9.04/hr) ($16.73/hr)

Married-couple families w/ children <18

($24.02/hr) All families w/ children <18

Male-headed families w/ children <18

Female-headed families w/ children <18

($30.86/hr)

($18.81/hr)

($7.72/hr)

Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma 2009; 2012 HHS Poverty Guidelines, Federal Register, Vol. 77, No. 17, January 26, 2012, p. 4034-4035; Oklahoma State Dept. of Human Services; U.S. Census Bureau, 2006-10 American Community Survey.

Notes: For the self-sufficiency wage, family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child. Hourly wages given assume full-time, year-round employment. Welfare wage is the combined value of TANF, SNAP, & WIC. Values shown for median family income are midpoint estimates within a 90% confidence range, which can be very wide. Estimates with margins of error exceeding +/- 10% of estimate are shown in italics.

EC

ON

OM

IC

S &

EM

PL

OY

ME

NT


Monthly Budget Distribution for Typical Family of Three Earning Self-Sufficiency Wage

Creek County, 2012

Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma 2009.

Housing$678

Child Care$794

Food$488

Transportation$265

Health Care$399

Miscellaneous$262

Taxes$32

23%

27%

17%

9%

14%

9%1%

Notes: Family of three in this example consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child.

Self-sufficiency wage = $2,918 per month.

EC

ON

OM

IC

S &

EM

PL

OY

ME

NT


Participation in Public Assistance ProgramsNumber of Participants and Percentage of Population Participating

During a Single Month, Creek County, 2012

15,401

9,788

381

788

562

12,873

122

6,832

1,502

22%

53.6%

45.3%

22.2%

12.8%

18.4%

0.9%

51.9%

11.4%

Soonercare Total (185%/100%)

Soonercare <19 (185%)

WIC Infants (185%)

WIC age 1-5 (185%)

Child Care Subsidy <5 (185%)

SNAP Total (130%)

TANF <18 (50%)

Elem. School Free Lunch (130%)

Elem. School Reduced Lunch (185%)

05,00010,00015,00020,000

Number of Participants

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Percent of Population

Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Statistical Bulletin, Jun. 2012; Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2011-12; US Census Bureau, 2010 Census; Oklahoma State Department of Health-WIC Service, Caseload Report, Jun. 2012; Oklahoma Health Care Authority, Fast Facts, July, 2011.

EC

ON

OM

IC

S &

EM

PL

OY

ME

NT


Ratio of Income to Poverty LevelPercentage of Total Population and Children

Oklahoma and Creek County, 2006-10 Estimates

Source: US Census Bureau, 2006-10 American Community Survey.

Total Under 18 Under 6 6-17 Total Under 18 Under 6 6-170%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Percentage of population

Below 100% Below 185% Below 200%

Below 100% 16.2% 23.1% 27.1% 21.1% 15.4% 22.4% 26.1% 20.8%

Below 185% 34.8% 45.4% 51.2% 42.5% 33.8% 45.4% 50.4% 43.3%

Below 200% 37.9% 48.9% 54.9% 45.9% 37.1% 49.1% 54.4% 46.9%

Oklahoma Creek County

Note: Values shown are midpoint estimates within a 90% confidence range, which can be very wide. Estimates with margins of error exceeding +/- 10% of estimate are shown in italics.

EC

ON

OM

IC

S &

EM

PL

OY

ME

NT


Ratio of Income to Poverty LevelNumber of Persons: Total Population and ChildrenOklahoma and Creek County, 2006-10 Estimates


Population Cohort

All Income Levels

100% of poverty

level

185% of poverty level

200% of poverty level

Total population 3,559,437 577,247 1,238,511 1,349,831

Oklahoma Under 18 years 895,872 207,039 406,823 438,327

Under 6 years 301,806 81,792 154,557 165,696

6-17 years 594,066 125,247 252,266 272,631

Total population 68,104 10,473 23,019 25,238

Creek County Under 18 years 17,083 3,825 7,756 8,394

Under 6 years 5,059 1,318 2,549 2,754

6-17 years 12,024 2,507 5,207 5,640


EC

ON

OM

IC

S &

EM

PL

OY

ME

NT


Ratio of Income to Poverty Level for Total PopulationOklahoma and Creek County, 1989, 1999 and 2006-10 Estimates

Source: US Census Bureau, 1990 & 2000 Censuses, 2006-10 American Community Survey.

1989 1999 2006-10 1989 1999 2006-100%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Percentage of population

Below 100% Below 185% Below 200%

Below 100% 16.7% 14.7% 16.2% 14.5% 13.5% 15.4%

Below 185% 36.1% 33.8% 34.8% 36.6% 33.8% 33.8%

Below 200% 39.4% 36.9% 37.9% 40.3% 37.1% 37.1%

Oklahoma Creek County


EC

ON

OM

IC

S &

EM

PL

OY

ME

NT


Ratio of Income to Poverty Level for Total PopulationOklahoma and Creek County, 1989, 1999 and 2006-10

Source: US Census Bureau, 1990 & 2000 Censuses; US Census Bureau, 2006-10 American Community Survey.

YearAll Income

Levels100% of

poverty level185% of

poverty level200% of

poverty level

~1989 3,051,515 509,854 1,100,261 1,201,628

Oklahoma ~1999 3,336,224 491,235 1,126,400 1,230,608

~2006-10 3,559,437 577,247 1,238,511 1,349,831

~1989 60,132 8,722 22,013 24,212

Creek County ~1999 66,823 8,924 22,436 24,578

~2006-10 68,104 10,473 23,019 25,238

EC

ON

OM

IC

S &

EM

PL

OY

ME

NT


Percent in Poverty by RaceCreek County, 2006-10 Estimates


13.2%

86.8%

36.9%

63.1%

16.8%

83.2%

100.0%24.9%

75.1%

25.8%

74.2%

Below Poverty Above Poverty

NH White Black

Total: 53,788

American Community Survey data are midpoint estimates within a 90% confidence range, which can be very wide. Estimates with margins of error exceeding +/- 10% of estimate are shown in italics.

American Indian

Asian Hispanic Other

Total:1,359 Total: 4,386

Total: 6,225Total: 2,093Total: 253

EC

ON

OM

IC

S &

EM

PL

OY

ME

NT


Percent in Poverty by Race, Population 0-4Creek County, 2006-10 Estimates


26.5%

73.5%

36.6%

63.4%

25.9%

74.1%

100.0%

50.0%

50.0%

34.4%

65.6%

Below Poverty Above Poverty

NH White Black

Total:2,877

American Community Survey data are midpoint estimates within a 90% confidence range, which can be very wide. Estimates with margins of error exceeding +/- 10% of estimate are shown in italics.

American Indian

Asian Hispanic Other

Total:112 Total:305

Total: 610Total: 256Total: 21

EC

ON

OM

IC

S &

EM

PL

OY

ME

NT


Median Family IncomeBy Family Type and Presence of Children under 18

Oklahoma and Creek County, 2006-10 Estimates


$49,458

$64,992

$20,070

$33,728

$49,167

$64,179

$16,607

$39,125

$56,733

$61,951

$35,872

$42,333

$51,935

$56,005

$32,166

$31,058

Oklahoma

All families

Married-couple

Female-headed

Male-headed

Creek Co.

All families

Married-couple

Female-headed

Male-headed

$0$25,000$50,000$75,000

Families WITH children

$0 $25,000 $50,000 $75,000

Families WITHOUT children


EC

ON

OM

IC

S &

EM

PL

OY

ME

NT


Educational Attainment for Persons Age 25 & OlderCreek County, 2006-10 Estimates


16.6%

39.7%

22%

6.8%

11.1%

2.9%

0.6%

0.3%

Less than high school

High school graduate

Some college

Associate degree

Bachelor's degree

Master's degree

Professional school degree

Doctorate degree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Percent of persons 25+Note: Values shown are midpoint estimates within a 90% confidence range, which can be very wide. Estimates with margins of error exceeding +/- 10% of estimate are shown in italics.

EC

ON

OM

IC

S &

EM

PL

OY

ME

NT


Real Hourly Wage by Educational AttainmentUnited States, 1973-2007

Source: Economic Policy Institute, The State of Working America 2008-10, table 3.15.

1973

1975

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

$0

$10

$20

$30

$40


Less than high school High school Some college

College degree Advanced degree

EC

ON

OM

IC

S &

EM

PL

OY

ME

NT


Real Hourly Wage by Educational Attainment for MenUnited States, 1973-2007

1973

1975

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

$0

$10

$20

$30

$40





EC

ON

OM

IC

S &

EM

PL

OY

ME

NT


Real Hourly Wage by Educational Attainment for WomenUnited States, 1973-2007

1973

1975

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

$0

$10

$20

$30

$40





EC

ON

OM

IC

S &

EM

PL

OY

ME

NT


Real Hourly Wage by Educational Attainment, by SexUnited States, 2007

Less than high school High school College degree Advanced degree$0.00

$10.00

$20.00

$30.00

$40.00Real hourly wage (2007 dollars)

Both sexes Men Women

Both sexes $11.38 $15.01 $26.51 $33.57

Men $12.32 $16.68 $30.36 $38.10

Women $9.43 $13.10 $22.63 $28.77


EC

ON

OM

IC

S &

EM

PL

OY

ME

NT


Unemployment RatesCreek County, 1990 - 2012

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

1990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011 Jun.2012

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

Creek Co. 5.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 6.8 4.8 4.3 4.1 3.9 3.7 3.3 3.6 5.5 6.9 5.9 5.7 4.3 4.4 4.2 8.3 8.7 7.2 6.2

EC

ON

OM

IC

S &

EM

PL

OY

ME

NT

CHILD INDICATORS

THE ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES (ACE) STUDY PYRAMID

Early Death

Disease, Disability and Social Problems

Adoption of Health-risk Behaviors

Social, Emotional and Cognitive Impairment

Disrupted Neurodevelopment

Adverse Childhood Experiences

Conception

Death

Mechanisms by which Adverse Childhood Experiences Influence Health and Well-being throughout the Lifespan

Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “About the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study.”

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S

ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES…

Recurrent physical abuse

Recurrent emotional abuse

Sexual abuse An alcohol or drug

abuser An incarcerated

household member

Someone who is chronically depressed, suicidal, institutionalized or mentally ill

Mother being treated violently

One or no parents Emotional or physical

neglectSource: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “What are Adverse Childhood Experieinces (ACE’s).”

…GROWING UP IN A HOUSEHOLD WITH: CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S

…LEAD TO HEALTH-RISK BEHAVIORS… Smoking Overeating Physical inactivity Heavy alcohol use Drug use Promiscuity

Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S

…WHICH CAUSE DISEASE, DISABILITY AND SOCIAL PROBLEMS IN ADULTHOOD

Heart disease Cancer Chronic lung and liver

disease Stroke Diabetes Sexually transmitted

diseases

Nicotine addiction Alcoholism Drug addiction Obesity Depression Suicide Injuries Unintentional

pregnancy

Source: Felitti, Vincent J., “The Relationship of Adverse Childhood Experiences to Adult Health: Turning gold into lead;” CDC Media Relations, May 14, 1998, “Adult Health Problems Linked to Traumatic Childhood Experiences.”

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


Summary of Risk Factors for InfantsCreek County and State of Oklahoma, 2008

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Vital Statistics.

16.6%

39.2%

5.8%

18.8%

8.2%

1.4%

34.2%

22.6%

14%

13.7%

42.3%

5.4%

21.4%

6.9%

1.4%

34.8%

20.5%

11%

Teen mother(age 15-19)

Unmarried mother

Poor prenatal care(3rd trimester/no care)

Mother w/ <12th gradeeducation

Low birthweight(1500-2499 grams)

Very low birthweight(<1500 grams)

Short birth spacing(<24 mos. apart)

Very short birth spacing(<18 mos. apart)

Premature(<37 weeks gest.)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Percent of Births

Creek County

Oklahoma

Creek County births: 902Oklahoma births: 54,753

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


Characteristics of Births to Teen Mothers (Age 15-19)Creek County and State of Oklahoma, 2008


79.3%

6.8%

52.3%

9.3%

2.7%

74.3%

57.1%

12.8%

21.3%

2%

81.6%

7.1%

54.1%

7.9%

1.8%

67.6%

46.9%

11.6%

20.8%

3.6%

Unmarried

Poor prenatal care(3rd trimester/no care)

Mother w/ <12th gradeeducation

Low birthweight(1500-2499 grams)

Very low birthweight(<1500 grams)

Short birth spacing(<24 mos. apart)

Very short birth spacing(<18 mos. apart)

Premature(<37 weeks gest.)

1+ previous births

2+ previous births

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent of Births

Creek Co.

Oklahoma

Creek County births to teens: 150Creek County teen birth rate: 63.1 (per 1,000 females age 15-19)

Oklahoma births to teens: 7,492Oklahoma teen birth rate: 60.2 (per 100,000 females age 15-19)

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


Resident Births, by Trimester of Entry into Prenatal CareCreek County, 1980, 1990, 2000 and 2008


63.2%24.5%

7.9%

0.6%3.7%

67.6%

22.3%

5.6%

1.2%

3.4%

70.0%

21.6%

3.4%1.6%

3.3%

71.3%

22.5%

3.3%2.4%

0.4%

1st trimester 2nd trimester 3rd trimester None Unknown

1980 1990

2000 2008

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


Resident Births to Teens Age 15-17 and 18-19Washington County, 1980, 1990, 2000 and 2008


1980 1990 2000 20080

30

60

90

120

150

180

Number of births

0

30

60

90

120

150

180Specific birth rate

Births 15-17 70 58 54 43

Births 18-19 142 98 113 107

Birth rate 15-17 43.2 39.4 32.7 25.9

Birth rate 18-19 161 127.1 131.9 131.3

Note: Specific birth rate is the number of births to females in specified age group per 1,000 females in age group.

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


Infant Mortality Rates (5-year averages)Creek County and Oklahoma, 1980 through 2008

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health

19

80

-84

19

81

-85

19

82

-86

19

83

-87

19

84

-88

19

85

-89

19

86

-90

19

87

-91

19

88

-92

19

89

-93

19

90

-94

19

91

-95

19

92

-96

19

93

-97

19

94

-98

19

95

-99

19

96

-20

00

19

97

-20

01

19

98

-20

02

19

99

-20

03

20

00

-04

20

01

-05

20

02

-06

20

03

-07

20

04

-08

0

5

10

15

20Number of infant deaths per 1,000 live births

Creek Co. Oklahoma

Creek Co. 12 10.9 9.4 8.6 8.5 7 6.5 5.5 6.4 6.4 6.7 8.3 8.3 7.8 8.2 8.6 7.4 7.4 8.1 7.7 7.2 7.4 8.6 8.4 8.8

Oklahoma 11.2 10.9 10.6 10.1 9.8 9.3 9 8.9 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.6 8.4 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.3 8 8.1 8 7.9 7.8 8 8.1 8

From 2004 through 2008, there was an average of 7.8 infant deaths per year in Creek County, for a rate of 8.8 per 1,000 live births. In Oklahoma, the average was 425 infant deaths, for a rate of 8.0.

“Healthy People 2010” goal = 4.5 per 1,000

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


Enrollment and Percentage of Children Enrolled in Special Education, by School District

Creek County County, School Year 2009-10

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Education, Office of Accountability.

Allen

Bowde

n

Bristo

w

Depew

Drum

right

Gypsy

Kellyv

ille

Kiefer

Lone

Sta

r

Man

nfor

dM

ilfay

Mou

nds

Oilton

Olive

Pretty

Wat

er

Sapulp

a0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

Enrollment

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%Percent in Special Education

Enrollment % Spec. Ed.

Enrollment 332 1,695 376 653 128 1,183 468 892 1,486 55 695 313 403 266 4,149

% Spec. Ed. 16.9%16.0%27.1%17.6%10.9%14.6%14.7% 7.4% 16.2%20.0%26.9%21.7%16.4%13.5%14.7%

Creek County total enrollment = 12,762; percentage in special education = 15.9%

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


DHS Licensed Child Care Services Provided to Children Under Age 5, by Age

Creek County, October 2001 & 2011

Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Monthly Statistical Bulletins.

36

66

8380

92

26

8891

82

62

< Age 1 Age 1 Age 2 Age 3 Age 40

20

40

60

80

100 2001 2011 CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


DHS Child Care Licensed Facilities and Subsidized Care, by StarsCreek County, October 2011

Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Monthly Statistical Bulletin.

25

2

21

4

6

16

330

41

1 Star

1+ Star

2 Star

3 Star

01020304050

Facilities

0 100 200 300 400

Subsidized Care

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


DHS Child Care Licensed Facilities and Capacity, by TypeCreek County, October 2011

Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Monthly Statistical Bulletin.

52

28

25

19

27

9

1,692

1,262

1,458

1,179

234

83

Total

DHS Contract Total

Total Centers

DHS Contract Centers

Total Homes

DHS Contract Homes

0204060

Facilities

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000

Capacity

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


Early Childhood (Pre-K) Enrollment, by School DistrictCreek County, October 2003

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Education, Accreditation and Data Processing/Research Services.

32

0

15

1

0

51

1

6

95

0

40

15

0

0

227

0

95

0

8

20

0

22

0

0

7

0

0

27

21

0

Allen Bowden

Bristow

Depew

Drumright

Gypsy

Kellyville

Kiefer

Lone Star

Mannford

Milfay

Mounds

Oilton

Olive

Pretty Water

Sapulpa

050100150200250 0 50 100 150

4 year old half day 4 year old full day


Creek County total 4 year old half day pre-K = 483; full day = 200.

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


Early Childhood (Pre-K) Enrollment, by School DistrictCreek County, October 2010

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Education, Accreditation and Data Processing/Research Services.

1

3

0

0

0

59

0

2

7

0

0

0

0

0

2

35

86

10

52

20

0

45

77

88

8

34

15

15

25

233

Allen Bowden

Bristow

Depew

Drumright

Gypsy

Kellyville

Kiefer

Lone Star

Mannford

Milfay

Mounds

Oilton

Olive

Pretty Water

Sapulpa

020406080100 0 50 100 150 200 250 300



Creek County total 4 year old half day pre-K = 59; full day = 709; 3 year old half day pre-K = 15; full day = 34.

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


Child Deaths Due to AbuseOklahoma, Fiscal Years 1978 - 2009

Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Children & Family Services Division.

75

12 13

1821

16 16

24

31

2325

18

38

2023

3134

29

4245

47 48

3835

27

51

40

32

3941

52

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


Age of Children of Confirmed Abuse and NeglectOklahoma, FY 2011

Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Child Abuse and Neglect Statistics, State FY 2011.

Under 11,274 (15.7%)

1-21,399 (17.3%)

3-62,252 (27.8%)

7-111,869 (23.0%)

12 & older1,316 (16.2%)

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S

CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT In Creek County in FY 2011, there were 423 reports of child

abuse and/or neglect accepted for investigation or assessment. 695 children were involved in these reports (duplicated count).

113 children were confirmed victims of child abuse and/or neglect. Eight were abused, 90 were neglected, 10 were victims of both abuse and neglect.

Nine of every 1,000 children in Creek County are victims of abuse and/or neglect. In Oklahoma, the rate is nine of every 1,000 children.

Parents make up 77% of all perpetrators, followed by “no relation” at 6%, step-parents at 6%, and grandparents at 3%.

Substance abuse is a major contributing factor to child neglect.

Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Child Abuse and Neglect Statistics, State FY 2011.

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


Child Abuse and Neglect Reports Received and Accepted for Investigation or Assessment

Creek County, Fiscal Year 2002 - 2011

Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Child Abuse and Neglect Statistics.

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

500

1,000

1,500Number of reports received and accepted

Reports received 1,006 964 891 1,125 1,159 1,133 1,105 1,093 1,209 1,159

Reports accepted 554 546 509 643 605 504 559 513 546 423

Notes: Each “report” of child abuse and/or neglect “received” and “accepted” may involve multiple children.

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


Number of Children Assessed or Investigated and Confirmed Victims of Child Abuse and Neglect

Creek County, Fiscal Year 2002 - 2011

Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Child Abuse and Neglect Statistics.

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

400

800

1,200Number of reports and confirmations

0%

10%

20%

30%Confirmation rate

Assessed or Investigated 841 969 829 915 1,051 761 844 861 756 695

Confirmations 155 212 172 192 226 92 104 107 92 113

Confirmation rate 18% 22% 21% 21% 22% 12% 12% 12% 12% 16%

Notes: Each “confirmation” of child abuse and/or neglect indicates one child. Since a child may be confirmed abused and/or neglected multiple times in a year, “confirmations” is not an unduplicated count of children. “Confirmation rate” is the number of children confirmed abused and/or neglected per 100 children investigated or assessed.

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


Elementary School Students Eligible for Free and Reduced Lunch Program

By School District, Creek County, 2011-2012 School Year

Source: Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2011-2012.

51.9%

68%

55.1%

57.2%

63.9%

63.3%

59.5%

42.8%

43.7%

48.3%

92.1%

58.7%

46.2%

53.6%

42.1%

47.5%

11.4%

9.9%

11.7%

9.4%

10.8%

8.6%

12.4%

8.2%

11.3%

11.7%

3.2%

10.4%

15.3%

16.4%

9.1%

11.5%

Creek Co.Total

Allen Bowden

Bristow

Depew

Drumright

Gypsy

Kellyville

Kiefer

Lone Star

Mannford

Milfay

Mounds

Oilton

Olive

Pretty Water

Sapulpa

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent of Students Eligible

Free Reduced

Free lunch eligibility requirement: annual household income below 130% of poverty, which currently is $24,817 for a family of three.

Reduced lunch eligibility requirement: annual household income below 185% of poverty, which currently is $35,317 for a family of three.

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


Juvenile Arrests, by Type of CrimeCreek County, 2002 through 2010

Source: Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reports.

Index crimes Drug related Alcohol related Other crimes0

100

200

300

400Number of arrests

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Includes murder, rape, robbery aggravated

assault, burglary, larceny, and motor vehicle theft.

Includes sale/manufacturing

and possession of drugs.

Includes driving under the influence, liquor law violations, and

drunkenness.

Includes other assaults, disorderly conduct, curfew & loitering, runaway and all other non-traffic offenses

A total of 379 juvenile arrests were made in Creek County in 2010, for a rate of 47.0 per 1,000 juveniles age 10-17, down from 521 arrests for a

rate of 60.8 in 2002.

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


Source: Centers for Disease Control, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System; Oklahoma State Department of Health, OK2SHARE.

47.8%

22%

9.9%

22.2%

26.5%

17.5%

30.6%

40.5%

18.7%

7.1%

18.4%

28.6%

12.3%

25.8%

43.1%

15.9%

5.5%

19.1%

23.2%

13.3%

26.8%

39%

17.2%

4.8%

16.8%

22.6%

11%

23.1%

44.7%

19.7%

4.4%

22.3%

20%

10.5%

29.1%

Alcohol

Marijuana

Methamphetamine

Offered/sold/givenillegal drugs at school

Smoked cigarettesduring past month

Drove after drinkingalcohol in past month

Rode with drinkingdriver in past month

0% 20%40%60%80%100%

2003 Oklahoma

2005 Oklahoma

2007 Oklahoma

2009 Oklahoma

2007 US

Youth Risk Behavior Survey:Summary of Alcohol, Other Drug & Tobacco Use

High School Students, Oklahoma, 2003 through 2009, and U.S., 2007

Used once or more during past 30 days...

Ever used...

Note: National 2009 YRBSS data have not yet been released.

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


Source: Centers for Disease Control, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System; Oklahoma State Department of Health, OK2SHARE.

50%

5.8%

64.3%

17.7%

7%

14.2%

49.3%

6.5%

61.7%

16.4%

7.9%

15.9%

38.2%

50.9%

5.8%

59.6%

16.7%

5.9%

15.2%

49.6%

51.1%

4.7%

56.7%

22.7%

7%

16.4%

47.4%

47.8%

7.1%

61.5%

16%

6.9%

15.8%

34.7%

Ever hadsexual intercourse

Had sex before age 13

Used condom last time

Used birth controlpills last time

Attempted suicidein past year

Overweight(according to BMI)

Physical activity for60 min/day 5 of past 7 days

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2003 Oklahoma

2005 Oklahoma

2007 Oklahoma

2009 Oklahoma

2007 US

Youth Risk Behavior Survey:Summary of Sexual Behaviors, Suicide & Physical Health

High School Students, Oklahoma, 2003 through 2009, and U.S., 2007

Note: National 2009 YRBSS data have not yet been released.

na

CH

IL

D I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCESCREEK COUNTY RANKINGS

Rankings: 1 = best, 77 = worst*Indicates a tie with at least one other county

Source: Oklahoma KIDS COUNT Factbook, 2006-2007, Oklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy

Parental separation or divorce 33

Incarcerated household member 50

Mentally ill household member 67*

Substance abusing household member 1*

Violence against mother 36

Psychological, physical & sexual abuse 7

Emotional & physical neglect 16

Overall ranking 15

HE

AL

TH

IN

DIC

AT

OR

S

HEALTH INDICATORS


Health StatusOklahoma and United States, 1996 - 2011

Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“

'96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '110%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%Percent adults reporting fair or poor health

0

10

20

30

40

50State rank

Rank Oklahoma US

Rank 26 32 28 25 42 34 45 41 41 44 42 46 43 42 42 45

Oklahoma 13.1% 14% 13.4% 12.6% 17.4% 15.3% 19.6% 17.7% 17.8% 19.7% 18.7% 20.2% 19.2% 18.7% 19.6% 20.5%

US 12.9% 12.9% 12.8% 12.6% 13% 13.9% 14% 14.7% 14.7% 14.9% 14.8% 14.7% 14.9% 14.4% 14.5% 14.7%

HE

AL

TH

IN

DIC

AT

OR

S


Prevalence of ObesityOklahoma and United States, 1990 - 2011


'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '110%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%Percent of population estimated to be obese

0

10

20

30

40

50State rank

Rank Oklahoma US

Rank 23 23 22 37 14 14 12 27 14 35 37 22 38 29 37 37 38 44 43 46 46 40

Oklahoma 11.6% 11.6% 11.9% 14.1% 12.1% 13.2% 13.5% 16.8% 15.1% 19.5% 21.1% 19.7% 22.6% 22.9% 24.4% 24.9% 26.8% 28.8% 28.8% 30.9% 32% 31.3%

US 11.6% 11.6% 12.6% 12.6% 13.7% 14.4% 15.9% 16.8% 16.5% 18.3% 19.6% 20% 20.9% 21.9% 22.9% 23.2% 24.4% 25.1% 26.3% 26.7% 26.9% 27.5%

HE

AL

TH

IN

DIC

AT

OR

S


Oklahoma's Rankings in Health Determinants, 2012 (part 1)According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings

Note: Missing data values represent years in which variables were not measured/ranked.


#47

#12

#45

#25

#39

#42

#11

#24

#29

Personal Behaviors

Prevalence of smoking

Prevalence of Binge Drinking

Prevalence of obesity

Community & Environment

High school graduation

Violent crime

Occupational fatalities

Infectious disease

Children in poverty

Air pollution

#0 #10 #20 #30 #40 #50

1992 2002 2012

Ranking: 1=best, 50=worst

HE

AL

TH

I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


Oklahoma's Rankings in Health Determinants, 2012 (part 2)According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings

Notes: Missing data values represent years in which variables were not measured/ranked. Updated data for “early prenatal care” were not available. Shown results are for 1991, 2001, & 2011.


#35

#15

#20

#47

#49

#45

#42

Public & Health Policies

Lack of health insurance

Public health funding (per capita)

Immunization coverage

Clinical Care

Early prenatal care

Primary Care Physicians

Preventable Hospitalizations

All Determinants

#0 #10 #20 #30 #40 #50

1992 2002 2012


HE

AL

TH

I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


Oklahoma's Rankings in Health Outcomes, 2012According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings

Note: Missing data values represent years in which variables were not measured/ranked.


#46

#40

#20

#39

#48

#42

#46

#44

Poor mental health days

Poor physical health days

Geographic disparity

Infant mortality

Cardiovascular deaths

Cancer deaths

Premature death

All Health Outcomes

#0 #10 #20 #30 #40 #50

1992 2002 2012


Oklahoma’s overall health ranking for 2012 is # 43

HE

AL

TH

I

ND

IC

AT

OR

S


Health Insurance Status, by AgeOklahoma, 2009-10

Source: Kaiser Family Foundation, StateHealthFacts.org; Oklahoma Health Care Authority, Oklahoma County Chartbook, May 2009.

1,707,200(47.0%)

133,500(3.7%)

569,800(15.7%)

505,400(13.9%)

80,100(2.2%)

638,500(17.6%)

423,100(43.9%)

32,400(3.4%)

383,700(39.8%)

124,300(12.9%)

1,291,800(60.1%)

97,600(4.5%)

142,500(6.6%)

106,600(5.0%)

511,900(23.8%)

Employer Individual Medicaid Medicare Other public Uninsured

Total Population Under Age 19 Age 19-64

Estimated uninsured non-elderly population, 2008 (Oklahoma Health Care Authority, May 2009):

~ Creek County: 19.2%

HE

AL

TH

IN

DIC

AT

OR

S

…IN SUMMARY

KEY VARIABLES

Creek County is expected to have modest growth through 2030, with older age groups increasing dramatically in relative share of population

Creek County follows the state trend in decreasing married-couple families with children,

Creek County’s poverty trends are almost identical to that of the state total. Because the county’s minority groups are small, it’s difficult to gauge poverty accurately by race

SU

MM

AR

Y

BEST PRACTICES STRATEGIES

Outcome performance measures Community coalitions

Collaborative, public-private partnerships Consumer/client investments

Successful outreach and recruitment Case management/Care coordination Strong social marketing Risk reduction education Access to services and care

Child care Transportation Translation

SU

MM

AR

Y

COMMUNITY PROFILE 2012EARLY CHILDHOOD INDICATORS OF CREEK COUNTY

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater TulsaAugust, 2012

…is available on our website:www.csctulsa.org

prepared by the community service council august 2012

Documents