prepared by the community service council of greater tulsa

87
Bartlesville Regional United Way with Emphasis on Washington County Community Profile 2005 Prepared b y The Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Upload: wesley-dawson

Post on 29-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Bartlesville Regional United Waywith Emphasis on Washington County

Community Profile 2005

Prepared b y The Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Page 2: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Bartlesville Regional United WayCommunity Profile 2005

Human Investment IndustryDemographic TrendsImplications for the Community

���

Page 3: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

The Human Investment Industry and the Challenges it Faces

Page 4: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

What is the Human Investment Industry in BRUW Service Areas ?

Independent and collective action to address the education, health, housing, family support, emergency financial, and transportation needs of families and individuals in BRUW service areas.

Increasingly these efforts seek to prevent needs through promoting increased self-sufficiency among the communities' people while still intervening to respond to crises and other concerns.

Page 5: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

The Roots of the Challenge Thirty Years of Economic and Social Changes

Emergence of new persistent poor in late 1960's and early 1970's

Massive loss of low skill/high pay jobs

Sharp rise in working poor

Decline in young male workers' wages

Increase in female headed families

Increase in substance abuse

>

>

>

>

>

>

All trends disproportionately impact African-Americans and families with young children.

Page 6: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

04/22/2304/22/23 Prepared by the Community ServiPrepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsace Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Source: Hodgkinson, Harold, "The Client," Education Demographer, 1988.

1900 - 1940 1940 - 1990 1990 - ?0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Poor - 75%

Poor - 20%Poor - 10%

Rich - 20%

Middle - 60%

Rich - 5% Rich - 10%

Middle - 20%

Middle - 80%

The trend: housing patterns and income mirror the job structure, with more rich, more poor, and fewer in the middle -- the "hourglass effect"

The “Shrinking Middle Class” with Greater Dependence on the Local Communities

Page 7: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Washington CountyDemographic Trends

Population change--out-migration of 19-64 years oldsAge--aging populationRace and Ethnicity--more culturally diverseLiving arrangements--poor but stable

>

>>>

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Page 8: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

N

EW

S

Bartlesville

PawhuskaNowata

Dewey

Copan

Ramona

Lenapah

Vera

Delaware

Wann

Ochelata

74056

74048

7402274072

74003

74027

74006

74061

74083

74029

74051

74042

Osage

Nowata

Wash ington

Bartlesville Regional United Way (Oklahoma part)

BRUW

Page 9: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Population of Washington County and Bartlesville

1980, 1990, 2000, 2003 (est.), 2010 [est.] and 2020 [est.]

Source: U. S. Bureau of the Census.

48,113 48,066 48,996 49,121 49,718 50,777

34,568 34,256 34,748 34,710 35,250 36,030

1980 1990 2000 2003 2010 20200

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

Bartlesville

Washington Co.

Page 10: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Trends in Age Distribution, Washington County1990, 2000, 2003 (est.), 2010 (proj.) and 2020 (proj.)

Source: U. S. Bureau of the Census.

1990 2000 2003(est.)

2010(proj.)

2020(proj.)

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

0-4 3,255 2,918 2,894 3,228 3,280

5-17 9,170 9,345 8,709 7,898 8,401

18-24 3,563 3,794 4,735 5,156 4,241

25-64 24,289 24,239 24,014 24,356 24,250

65-84 6,991 7,651 7,624 7,486 8,838

85+ 798 1,049 1,145 1,594 1,767

Page 11: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa (1/2004).

Population by Age GroupTulsa, Washington, Osage and Nowata Counties, 2000

Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census.

Tulsa

Washington

Nowata

Osage

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent of population

0-4 5-17 18-24 25-64 65-84 85+

Tulsa Washington Nowata Osage

0-4 7.4 6 6.2 6.5

5-17 18.9 19.1 20.2 19.6

18-24 10 7.7 17.7 7.6

25-64 51.9 49.5 52.9 49

65-84 10.4 15.6 11.6 14.9

85+ 1.4 2.1 1.4 2.4

Page 12: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Race and Ethnicity Comparison for Children under 5 and Total Population

Oklahoma and Washington County, 2000

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census.

65.7%

9.5%

11.0%

1.3%

12.5%

71.1%

3.1%

12.3%

0.9%

12.6%

76.2%

7.6%

7.9%

1.4%

7.0%

81.2%2.5%

8.6%

0.7%

7.0%

White Black American Indian Asian Other/2+ races

Hispanic9.7%

Oklahoma Washington County

Hispanic5.0%

Under 5

Total Population

Hispanic5.2%

Hispanic2.6%

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Page 13: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Ratio of Income to Poverty LevelPercentage of Total Population and Selected Age Groups

Washington County, 1999

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000.

Total population

Under 5 5-17 Under 18 18-64 65 & older0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Percentage of population

Below 100% Below 130% Below 185%

Below 100% 11.9% 24.3% 13.9% 16.3% 11.2% 7.8%

Below 130% 17.5% 33.3% 20.7% 23.6% 15.9% 14.2%

Below 185% 28.8% 47.6% 33.9% 37.1% 25.7% 27%

Page 14: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Implications for the Community

Page 15: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Implications for the communityImplications for the community

Services for the aging populationServices for the aging population Employment to attract and retain young professionalsEmployment to attract and retain young professionals Culturally diverse servicesCulturally diverse services Services for young families that are fragileServices for young families that are fragile Services to maintain teen engagement in educationServices to maintain teen engagement in education Early childhood supportsEarly childhood supports

Page 16: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Services for the aging populationServices for the aging population

There is an increase in 65 to 85 year olds greater than There is an increase in 65 to 85 year olds greater than the 25 to 64 year olds.the 25 to 64 year olds.

The population will be disproportionately living alone The population will be disproportionately living alone especially women.especially women.

A small amount of the population will continue to work.A small amount of the population will continue to work. The health of the population coming into retirement is The health of the population coming into retirement is

poor.poor. Disability indicators for the aging population is growing.Disability indicators for the aging population is growing.

Page 17: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Trends in Age Distribution, Washington County1990, 2000, 2003 (est.), 2010 (proj.) and 2020 (proj.)

Source: U. S. Bureau of the Census.

1990 2000 2003(est.)

2010(proj.)

2020(proj.)

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

18-24 3,563 3,794 4,735 5,156 4,241

25-64 24,289 24,239 24,014 24,356 24,250

65-84 6,991 7,651 7,624 7,486 8,838

85+ 798 1,049 1,145 1,594 1,767

Page 18: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Living Arrangements of Persons Age 65 & OlderWashington County, 2000

Source: U. S. Census Bureau, Census 2000.

30.2%

65.0%

3.7%1.0%

Live alone Family households Group quarters Other

77.6% of those living alone are women

Page 19: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Labor Force Participation among Persons Age 65 & OlderWashington County, 2000

Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census.

94710.9%

7,73889.1% Employed

Unemployed

918 (96.9%)

29 (3.1%)

NOT in labor force

In labor force

Page 20: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Report Card on HealthOklahoma and United States, 2002

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Report Card on Health, 2004.

85.6%

58.7%

22.9%

30.5%

30.6%

16.9%

26.6%

77.4%

59.2%

22.2%

31.2%

24.4%

11%

23%

Eat <5 fruits/vegetables per day

Overweight

Obese

HS students inactive

Adults inactive

Youth smokers

Adult smokers

0%25%50%75%100% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

Oklahoma U.S.

F

C

C

F

F

F

(na)

Page 21: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Mortality Rates for the Three Leading Causes of DeathOklahoma, 1930 - 2000

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health.

1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 20000

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400Rate per 100,000 persons

Heart Disease

Cancer

Stroke

Page 22: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

What is a Disability?

Source: ARC-USA, 2000; Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA); Developmental Services Division (DDSD), Oklahoma Department of Human Services (DHS), 2000; National Organization on Disability (NOD), 2000; U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2001, Americans with Disabilities: 1997 .

A person is considered to have a disability if he or she has difficulty performing certain functions (e.g., seeing, hearing, talking, walking, climbing stairs, lifting and carrying, etc.), or has difficulty performing activities of daily living, or has difficulty with certain social roles (e.g., doing school work for children, working at a job and around the house for adults, etc.).

– A person who is unable to perform one or more activities, or who uses some type of assistive technology to improve daily participation in all aspects of work, school and community life, or who needs assistance from another person to perform basic activities is considered to have a severe disability.

1 in 5 Americans have some level of disability.1 in 8 Americans have a severe disability.1 in 9 children age 6 to 14 have a disability.

*

Page 23: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Disability Prevalence by Age and Level of DisabilityOklahoma, 1997

Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2001, Americans with Disabilities: 1997 (Aug.-Nov. 1997 data from Survey of Income and Program Participation).

2%

3.4%

11.2%

10.7%

13.4%

22.6%

35.7%

49%

73.6%

4.8%

5.3%

8.1%

13.9%

24.2%

31.8%

57.6%

0 to 2

3 to 5

6 to 14

15-24

25-44

45-54

55-64

65-79

80+

Age Group

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent with Specified Level of Disability

Level of disabilityAny Severe

Page 24: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Employment to attract and retain young Employment to attract and retain young professionalsprofessionals

The 25-64 year olds population is declining in the The 25-64 year olds population is declining in the twenty year trend. twenty year trend.

Labor market participation primarily white collar but Labor market participation primarily white collar but poverty levels indicate a blue collar economy.poverty levels indicate a blue collar economy.

The unemployment rate does not reflect the real The unemployment rate does not reflect the real picture.picture.

Page 25: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Trends in Age Distribution, Washington County1990, 2000, 2003 (est.), 2010 (proj.) and 2020 (proj.)

Source: U. S. Bureau of the Census.

1990 2000 2003(est.)

2010(proj.)

2020(proj.)

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

18-24 3,563 3,794 4,735 5,156 4,241

25-64 24,289 24,239 24,014 24,356 24,250

65-84 6,991 7,651 7,624 7,486 8,838

85+ 798 1,049 1,145 1,594 1,767

Page 26: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Labor Force Participation among Adults, Age 20-64Washington County, 2000

Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census.

20,06274.7%

6,78525.3%

In armed forces

Employed

Unemployed

6 (0.0%)

19,218 (95.8%)

838 (4.2%)

NOT in labor force

In labor force

Current unemployment rate for all ages (March 2005) = 4.4%

61.2% of jobs are white collar 38.8% are blue collar (2004 est.)

Page 27: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Family Income DistributionTulsa, Washington, Osage and Nowata Counties, 1999

Source: U. S. Census Bureau, Census 2000.

60,283 (40.7%)

68,178 (46.0%)

19,728 (13.3%)

6,377 (45.0%)

5,950 (42.0%)

1,855 (13.1%)

6,011 (48.7%)

5,486 (44.5%)

835 (6.8%)

1,694 (57.0%)

1,165 (39.2%)

111 (3.7%)

<$40,000 $40,000-$99,999 $100,000+

Tulsa County Washington County

Osage County Nowata County

Page 28: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Unemployment RatesWashington County, 1992 - 2005

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

'92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 Mar.'05

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

Rate 6.3% 7.0% 6.4% 5.7% 4.7% 3.8% 3.9% 4.0% 3.5% 3.3% 4.6% 6.1% 5.7% 4.4%

Page 29: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Participation in Public Assistance ProgramsNumber of Participants and Percentage of Population Participating

Washington County, June 2005

Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Statistical Bulletin, June 2005; Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2003-2004; Pop. Estimates Division - U.S. Census Bureau.

1,335

3,688

4,636

115

2,556

752

46.1%

31.8%

9.4%

1%

30.7%

9%

Medicaid <5

Medicaid <18

Food Stamps Total

TANF <18

School Free Lunch

School Reduced Lunch

01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,000

Number of Participants

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Percent of Population

Page 30: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Median Family IncomeBy Family Type and Presence of Children under 18

Washington County, 1999

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000.

$41,362

$51,118

$17,636

$23,920

$45,620

$47,970

$34,795

$32,708

Washington County

All families

Married-couple families

Female-headed families

Male-headed families

$0$20,000$40,000$60,000

Families WITH children

$0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000

Families WITHOUT children

Page 31: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Ratio of Income to Poverty LevelNumber of Persons: Total Population and Selected Age Groups

Washington County, 1999

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000.

All Income Levels

100% of poverty level

130% of poverty

level

185% of poverty

level

Total population 48,225 5,739 8,456 13,894

Under 5 years 2,806 683 933 1,337

5-17 years 9,304 1,293 1,929 3,157

Under 18 years 12,110 1,976 2,862 4,494

18-64 years 27,760 3,110 4,407 7,148

65 & older 8,355 653 1,187 2,252

Page 32: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Poverty Status by Family Type & Age of Related ChildrenWashington County, 1999

Source: U. S. Census Bureau, Census 2000.

4.8%

7.2%

11.7%

12.8%

4.4%

29.3%

36.6%

55%

52.7%

29.1%

20%

24.5%

44.6%

48.7%

13.6%

Married-coupleTotal

with children <18

with children <5 only

with children <5 & 5-17

with children 5-17 only

Female-headedTotal

with children <18

with children <5 only

with children <5 & 5-17

with children 5-17 only

Male-headedTotal

with children <18

with children <5 only

with children <5 & 5-17

with children 5-17 only

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%Percent below Poverty

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Page 33: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Educational Attainment for Persons Age 25 & OlderWashington County, 2000

Source: U. S. Census Bureau, Census 2000.

14.8%

32.1%

21.7%

5.6%

16.6%

6.3%

1.6%

1.4%

Less than high school

High school graduate

Some college

Associate degree

Bachelor's degree

Master's degree

Professional school degree

Doctorate degree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Percent of persons 25+

Page 34: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Real Hourly Wage by Educational AttainmentUnited States, 1973-2003

Source: Economic Policy Institute website.

1973

1975

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

$0

$5

$10

$15

$20

$25

$30

$35Real hourly wage (2003 dollars)

Less than high school High school College degree Advanced degree

Page 35: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Occupied Housing Units by Tenure and by Length of Residence

Washington County, 2000

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census.

Owner-occupied74.0% Renter-occupied

26.0%

15 months or less10.6%

16 months to 5 years23.4%

More than 5 years66.1%

15 months or less43.1%

16 months to 5 years36.2%

More than 5 years20.6%

Tenure

Owner-Occupied Housing Units

Renter-Occupied Housing Units

Length of Residence

Page 36: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Occupied Housing Units by Tenure and by Length of Residence

For Householders Age 65 & OlderWashington County, 2000

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census.

Owner-occupied84.8% Renter-occupied

15.2%

15 months or less3.2%

16 months to 5 years10.7%

More than 5 years86.1%

15 months or less22.0%

16 months to 5 years38.2%

More than 5 years39.7%

Tenure

Owner-Occupied Housing Units

Renter-Occupied Housing Units

Length of Residence

Page 37: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Culturally diverse servicesCulturally diverse services

The population is becoming more culturally diverse with The population is becoming more culturally diverse with a growth in the Hispanic population.a growth in the Hispanic population.

The births in 2003 to women of Hispanic origin are The births in 2003 to women of Hispanic origin are twice the population rate.twice the population rate.

The estimated trend for 2010 is that 15% of births will The estimated trend for 2010 is that 15% of births will be to women of Hispanic origin.be to women of Hispanic origin.

Page 38: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Race and Ethnicity Comparison for Population Age Groups

Under 19, 19-64 and 65 & OlderWashington County, 2000

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census.

73.1%

3.2% 12.2%0.8%

10.7%

81.8%

2.6%8.4%

0.9%6.3%

91.1%

1.1%3.8%

0.1%3.9%

White Black American Indian Asian Other/2+ races

Hispanic: 4.1%

Under 19

Hispanic: 2.5%

19-64

Hispanic: 1.0%

65 & Older

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Page 39: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

04/22/2304/22/23 Prepared by the Community ServiPrepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsace Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Births by Race and Ethnicity of MotherWashington County, 2003

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health

50781.8%

203.2%

8613.9%

71.1%

White Black Amer. Indian Other

Washington County(total births=623)

Hispanic origin: 29 (4.7%), 2010 (est. ) 15%

Page 40: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Services for young families that are Services for young families that are fragilefragile

There is a decline in married couple households.There is a decline in married couple households. This particularly effects the African-American and This particularly effects the African-American and

Native American families.Native American families. There is a large gap in wages and livable income.There is a large gap in wages and livable income. There is a large number who do not have health There is a large number who do not have health

insurance or are on Medicaid.insurance or are on Medicaid. The number of births receiving prenatal care early is The number of births receiving prenatal care early is

good.good. The number of births to unmarried women are The number of births to unmarried women are

increasingincreasing

Page 41: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

And……..And……..

There is a decline in teen parenting but it is still very There is a decline in teen parenting but it is still very high as a percentage of total births.high as a percentage of total births.

There is a decline in infant mortality but it is still high.There is a decline in infant mortality but it is still high. There is a decline in domestic violence but it is still There is a decline in domestic violence but it is still

high.high.

Page 42: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Living Arrangements of Children Under 18Washington County, 1990 and 2000

Source: U. S. Bureau of the Census.

Married Couple Male-headed Female-headed Other relatives0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1990 77.6% 2.8% 13.7% 4.4%

2000 71.3% 4.6% 16.3% 5.9%

Page 43: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Types of Families with Own Children Under 18,by Race & Hispanic Origin

Washington County, 2000

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census.

4,59674.7%

1,19919.5%

3575.8%

3,79476.4%

88817.9%

2815.7%

9050.6%

7240.4%

169.0%

41271.0%

13823.8%

305.2%

4085.1%

612.8%

12.1%

11476.5%

2718.1%

85.4%

Married couple Female-headed Male-headed

Total White Black

American Indian Asian Hispanic

Page 44: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

The Self-Sufficiency Standard...

...The level of income requiredfor a family to meet its needs on its own.

Source: Wider Opportunities for Women, with Community Action Project of Tulsa County, 2002, "The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma."

Customized by specific family compositionCustomized by geographic locationBased on all expense categoriesUpdated annually using consumer price index

>>>>

Page 45: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Self-Sufficiency

Wage(annual)

Poverty Guidelines

(annual)

Dollar Difference

Self-SufficiencyPercent of

Poverty

One person

$15,276 $9,570 $5,706 159.6%

Two persons

$24,995 $12,830 $12,165 194.8%

Three persons

$30,385 $16,090 $14,295 188.8%

Four persons

$39,237 $19,350 $19,887 202.8%

Comparison of Self-Sufficiency Wage to Poverty Guidelines, by Size of Family

Washington County, 2005

Source: Wider Opportunities for Women, with Community Action Project of Tulsa County, "The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma;" Federal Register, February 18, 2005.

($4.60 per hour)

($6.17 per hour)

($7.74 per hour)

($9.30 per hour)

($7.34 per hour)

($12.02 per hour)

($14.61 per hour)

($18.86 per hour)

Notes: For the self-sufficiency wages shown in table, family of two consists of one adult and one preschooler; family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child; family of four consists of two adults, one preschooler and one schoolage child. Per hour wages given assume pay for 40 hours per week for 52 weeks.

Page 46: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Family of Three, Washington County, 2005

Source: Wider Opportunities for Women, with Community Action Project of Tulsa Tulsa County, "The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma;" Federal Register, February 18, 2005; Oklahoma State Dept. of Human Services; Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census.

$8,220$10,712

$16,090

$29,767

$41,362

WelfareWage

MinimumWage

PovertyWage

185% PovertyWage

Median FamilyIncome

(2000 Census)

$0

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

$60,000Annual Wage

Self-Sufficiency Wage = $30,385 ($14.61/hr.)

Note: For the self-sufficiency wage, family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child.The hourly wages given assume employment at 40 hours per week and 52 weeks per year.

Comparison of Wages: Self-Sufficiency, Welfare, Minimum, Poverty, 185% of Poverty, and Median Family Income

Married-couple w/ kids: $51,118

Male-headed w/ kids: $23,920

Female-headed w/ kids: $17,636

All families

($3.95/hr.)($5.15/hr.)

($7.74/hr.)

($14.31/hr.)

($19.89/hr.)

Page 47: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Monthly Budget Distribution for Typical Family of Three Earning Self-Sufficiency Wage

Washington County, 2005

Source: Wider Opportunities for Women, "The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma."

Housing$470

Child Care$616

Food$396

Transportation$207

Health Care$249

Miscellaneous$194

Taxes$181

20%

27%

17%

9%

11%

8%8%

Notes: Family of three in this example consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child. Current self-sufficiency wage for a family of three of this composition is $2,532 per month.

Page 48: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Health Insurance Status, by TypeWashington County, 2001

Source: Oklahoma Health Care Authority.

29,610 (60.2%)

4,428 (9.0%)

8,856 (18.0%)6,306 (12.8%)

Private Medicaid Medicare Uninsured

13% of adults (4,953) and 11% of children (1,353) in Washington County are uninsured.

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Page 49: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Resident Births, by Trimester of Entry into Prenatal CareWashington County, 1980, 1990, 2000 and 2003

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health.

658 (85.7%)

85 (11.1%)

12 (1.6%) 4 (0.5%)9 (1.2%)

544 (83.6%)

69 (10.6%)

10 (1.5%)5 (0.8%)

23 (3.5%)

489 (82.5%)

56 (9.4%)

8 (1.3%)

40 (6.7%)542 (87.0%)

74 (11.9%)

3 (0.5%)4 (0.6%)

1st trimester 2nd trimester 3rd trimester No care Unknown

1980 1990

2000 2003

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Page 50: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Resident Births by Marital Status of MotherWashington County, 1980, 1990, 2000 and 2003

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health.

715

527

416 410

49

124177

213

1980 1990 2000 20030

200

400

600

800

Number of births

Single Married

% Single 6.4 19 29.8 34.2

% Married 93.6 81 70.2 65.8

Page 51: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Resident Births to Women under Age 20Washington County 1980 - 2003

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health.

'80 '81 '82 '83 '84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '030

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Number of births

Washington Co.

Washington Co. 80 111 100 109 91 89 84 67 69 84 81 94 99 83 76 86 81 84 77 84 92 96 78 73

Page 52: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Infant Mortality Rates Washington County

3-Year Averages, 1980 through 2003

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health

1980

-82

1981

-83

1982

-84

1983

-85

1984

-86

1985

-87

1986

-88

1987

-89

1988

-90

1989

-91

1990

-92

1991

-93

1992

-94

1993

-95

1994

-96

1995

-97

1996

-98

1997

-99

1998

-00

1999

-1

2000

-2

2001

-3

0

5

10

15

20

Number of infant deaths per 1,000 live births

Washington Co.

“Healthy People 2010” goal = 5 per 1,000

2001-03 Total Infant Deaths:

Washington Co.: 13 (7.3/1,000)

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Page 53: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Domestic Violence Cases Reported toLaw Enforcement Agencies

Oklahoma, 1994 - 2003

Source: Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation 2003 Uniform Crime Report.

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 20030

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

Cases 18,153 18,621 21,683 23,087 21,435 21,211 22,065 23,687 25,157 23,773

Page 54: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Domestic Violence Cases Reported to Law Enforcement Agencies, by Offense

Oklahoma, 2003

Source: Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation 2003 Uniform Crime Report.

57 406

5,282

18,028

Homicides Violent sex crimes Felony assaults Felony assaults& battery

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

A total of 23,773 domestic violence cases were reported to Oklahoma law enforcement agencies in 2003.

Page 55: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Services to maintain teen engagement Services to maintain teen engagement in educationin education

Teens are disconnected from education.Teens are disconnected from education. Teens are disconnected from the work force.Teens are disconnected from the work force. Teens are engaged in substance use.Teens are engaged in substance use. Teens are becoming parents.Teens are becoming parents. Teens are committing suicide.Teens are committing suicide. HIV and AIDS is high in Oklahoma.HIV and AIDS is high in Oklahoma.

Page 56: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Percentage of Change in Average Daily Membership for 9th to 12th Grade Classes 2001 to 2004

Washington County School Districts

Source: Oklahoma Department of Education, 2005

Bartlesville Caney Valley Copan Dewey Washington Co.

0%

5%

-5%

-10%

-15%

-20%

-25%

-30%

-35%

2001 -19.1% -5.6% -11% -32.1% -19.6%

2002 -18.3 -15.3 0.3 -28.9 -19.2

2003 -17.1% -10.8% -24.9% -33.9% -19.8%

2004 -11.7% -16% -1.7% -33.7% -15.1%

Note: County ranking shown at top of bars (#1=best, #77=worst).

Page 57: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Labor Force Participation among Youths, Age 16-19Washington County, 2000

Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census.

1,44553.1%

1,27846.9%

In armed forces

Employed

Unemployed

2 (0.1%)

1,213 (83.9%)

230 (15.9%)

NOT in labor force

In labor force

Page 58: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Disconnected Youth: Percent of Youth Age 16-19 Not in School and Not Working

By County and Oklahoma, 2000

Source: Oklahoma KIDS COUNT Factbook 2004.

Tulsa Washington Oklahoma State0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

Percent 9.7% 9.2% 9.3%

Number 3,090 262 19,758

Note: County ranking shown at top of bars (#1=best, #77=worst).

Page 59: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Teen Mothers and Poor Birth Outcomes

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Maternal, Infant and Child Health, 1997 Selected Demographic Information.

Risk Factor Teen Moms

Oklahoma ranked 8th in the nation in rate of births to teens in 2002.

42% higher20% lower81% higher86% higher2.7 times higher2.3 times higher23% higher30% higher

Low birth weight1st Trimester prenatal care3rd Trimester prenatal care

No prenatal careUnmarried

Short interval births (<24 months)Premature births (>3 weeks early)

Birth complications

Women under age 20, "teens," are more at risk of poor birth outcomes than are women age 20 & older.

*

Page 60: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Characteristics of Births to Teen MothersBy County and Oklahoma 3-year average 2001-03

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health

71.5%

0.8%

52.4%

6.1%

0.4%

18.4%

2.9%

79.7%

10.7%

20.6%

8.6%

1.2%

20.6%

3.9%

75.2%

6.8%

20.7%

7.9%

1.4%

20.7%

3.4%

Unmarried

Poor prenatal care

Mother w/ <12thgrade education

Low birthweight(1500-2499 grams)

Very low birthweight(<1500 grams)

1+ previous births

2+ previous births

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent of Teen Births

Washington Co. Tulsa Co. Oklahoma

Notse: Teen mothers include females age 15 to 19. Teen birth rates represent the number of teen births per 100,000 females age 15 to 19. "Poor prenatal care" = entering prenatal care in 3rd trimester or receiving no prenatal care.

Washington County: births to teens: 82 teen birth rate: 45.2Tulsa County: births to teens: 1,110 teen birth rate: 58.5Oklahoma: births to teens: 6,973 teen birth rate: 55.8

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Page 61: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Resident Births to Teens Age 15-17 and 18-19Washington County, 1980, 1990, 2000 and 2003

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health.

1980 1990 2000 20030

20

40

60

80

Number of births

0

40

80

120

160Birth rate

Births 15-17 22 35 25 22

Births 18-19 57 46 66 51

Birth rate 15-17 18.8 35 21.5 20.7

Birth rate 18-19 83.1 87.6 109.1 68.8

Note: Teen birth rate is the number of births to females age 15-19 per 1,000 females age 15-19.

Page 62: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Birth Rates for Women under Age 20Washington County 1980 - 2003

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health.

'80 '81 '82 '83 '84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '030

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Birth rate

Washington Co.

Washington Co. 22.6 30.6 27 29.5 25.4 25.2 24.7 20.5 21.5 26.7 25.1 28.5 29.7 24.8 22.4 24.8 23.2 23.7 21.6 23.5 25.8 26.7 21.7 20.7

Page 63: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Current* Youth Tobacco Use by School Level and Tobacco Product

Oklahoma, 1999 and 2002

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Oklahoma Youth Tobacco Surveys, 1999 and 2002.

21%

17%

6%

9%

5%

42%

33%

13%

20%

5%

16%

10%

5%

8%

4%

32%

24%

10%

16%

5%

Middle School

Any tobacco

Cigarettes

Smokeless tobacco

Cigars

Pipe tobacco

High School

Any tobacco

Cigarettes

Smokeless tobacco

Cigars

Pipe tobacco

0%10%20%30%40%50% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

1999 2002

* Used 1 or more times during the 30 days prior to survey.

Page 64: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Substance Abuse Among High School StudentsOklahoma and U.S., 2003

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Oklahoma Youth Risk Behavior Survey, 2003; Centers for Disease Control, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System, 2003.

47.8%

22%

9.9%

9.2%

9.9%

44.9%

22.4%

12.1%

8.7%

7.6%

Alcohol

Marijuana

Inhalants

Cocaine

Methamphetamine

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Percent Reporting Use

Oklahoma

U.S.

Used once or more during

prior 30 days...

Ever used...

Page 65: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Methamphetamine Labs Seized by AuthoritiesOklahoma, 1994 - 2004

Source: Oklahoma State Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs Website.

10 34125

241 275

781

946

1,1931,254 1,235

812

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 20040

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400Number of labs discovered

Page 66: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Page 67: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Suicide Rates Among Persons of All AgesSuicide Rates Among Persons of All Ages

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Oklahoma, 1930 - 2003

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health; National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics Report.

1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 20030

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16Rate per 100,000 persons

Rate 9.3 1,0.1 8 6.4 8.3 9 9.8 9.5 1,0.7 1,5.2 1,3.6 1,4.8 1,3.3 1,4.6 1,4.7 1,2.6

Page 68: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Cumulative Total of Oklahomans Living with HIV and AIDSBy Year, 1990 to 2004

Source: Oklahoma State Dept. of Health, "HIV/AIDS Statistics."

150

200

300

550

750

850

1,05

0

1,25

9

1,35

9

1,40

6

1,45

1

1,59

7

1,72

9

1,90

5

1,85

9

450 70

0 950 1,

100

1,25

0

1,45

0

1,65

0

1,79

6

1,98

0

2,07

3

2,20

9

2,39

4

2,45

8

2,52

9

2,44

2

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 20040

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000Number of persons living with HIV and AIDS

AIDS HIV

Page 69: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Early childhood supportsEarly childhood supports

Early brain development recognized as key to reducing Early brain development recognized as key to reducing adverse effects in childhood and adolescence.adverse effects in childhood and adolescence.

Top risk factors present in Washington County at birth Top risk factors present in Washington County at birth and during early years.and during early years.

Page 70: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Importance of Brain Development for Children 0-3

Excerpt from: "The First Years Last Forever: I am Your Child"

Eighty percent of brain development occurs by age three.

Early experiences help to determine brain structure, thus shaping the way people learn, think, and behave for the rest of their lives.

The outside world shapes the brain's wiring.

The outside world is experienced through the senses - seeing, hearing, smelling, touching, and tasting - enabling the brain to create or modify connections.

Relationships with consistent caregivers early in life are the major source of development of the emotional and social parts of the brain.

Principles of Brain Development

Page 71: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Top Risk Factors for Young Children Age 0-4

Low-income and poverty

Teen mother, especially those with more than one child

Absent father

Short spacing between births (less than 24 months)

Parent, especially the mother, without a high school education

Lack of positive emotional, physical and intellectual experiences

>

>

>

>

>

>

Page 72: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Risk Factors Increase Likelihood of Both Immediate and Longer

Term Adverse Outcomes

Immediate Adverse Outcomes:Poor healthPoor developmentAbuseLack of school readiness

Longer Term Adverse Outcomes:Juvenile delinquencySubstance abuseTeen pregnancySchool dropoutLower earnings

�––––

�–––––

*

Page 73: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Summary of Risk Factors for InfantsWashington and Tulsa Counties and Oklahoma 3-year average 2001-03

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health.

13.9%

32.7%

1.7%

19.4%

5.7%

0.9%

25.6%

13.9%

11.9%

36.7%

6.8%

23.5%

6.7%

1.2%

34.3%

19.6%

13.7%

37.1%

4.7%

23.2%

6.6%

1.2%

32.2%

17.9%

Teen mother(age 15-19)

Unmarried mother

Poor prenatal care

Mother w/ <12th gradeeducation

Low birthweight(1500-2499 grams)

Very low birthweight(<1500 grams)

Short birth spacing(<24 mos. apart)

Very short birth spacing(<18 mos. apart)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Percent of Births

Notes: "Poor pranatal care" = entering prenatal care in 3rd trimester or receiving no prenatal care.

Washington County births: 591Tulsa County births: 9,357Oklahoma births: 50,874

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Page 74: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Impact of Poverty on Early Brain DevelopmentMultiple Pathways

Source: National Center for Children in Poverty.

Inadequate Nutrition

Substance Abuse

Lack of Mother-ChildConnection due to

Maternal Depression

Exposure toEnvironmental Toxins

Trauma/Abuse

Quality of Daily Care

Inadequate Prenatal Care

Lack of Basic Health Care

Early BrainDevelopment

Poverty

Page 75: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Average Daily Membership and Percentage of Children Enrolled in Special Education, by School District

Washington County, School Year 2002-03

Source: Office of Accountability, Oklahoma State Department of Education.

6,021

834411

1,148

12.2%

15.7%

14.4%

12.9%

Bartlesville Caney Valley Copan Dewey

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

ADM

0%

4%

8%

12%

16%Percent in Special Education

ADM Percent in Special Education

Washington County total ADM=8,414; percentage in special education=12.7%

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Page 76: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Child Care Helps Shape Children's FuturesAnd is Key to School Readiness

Excerpt from: Children's Defense Fund, "Child Care Basics," 1999.

A recent major study found that children in high quality child care demonstrated greater mathematical ability, greater thinking and attention skills, and fewer behavioral problems. These differences held true for children from a range of family backgrounds, with particularly significant effects for children at risk.

Research shows that quality of child care has a lasting impact on children's well-being and ability to learn. Children in poor quality child care have been found to be delayed in language and reading skills, and display more aggression toward other children and adults.

*

Page 77: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Early Childhood (Pre-K) Enrollment, by School DistrictWashington County, October 2003

Source: Oklahoma Department of Education.

9

34

39

60

39

47

21

40

38

37

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Copan

Dewey

Caney Valley

Richard Kane

Hoover

Jane Phillips

Oak Park

Ranch Heights

Wayside

Woodrow Wilson

010203040506070 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Half day Full day

Washington County total half day pre-K enrollment = 364; full day = 0.

An estimated 63% of all 4 years olds in Washington County are enrolled in public pre-K programs.

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Page 78: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Licensed Child Care Facilities and Capacity, by TypeWashington County, December 2004

Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Licensing Services Statewide Star Activity Statistics Report.

6

6

0

1

13

3

61

57

0

58

714

222

Homes

1+ Star

2 Star

3 Star

Centers

1+ Star

2 Star

3 Star

051015

Facilities

0 200 400 600 800

Capacity

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Page 79: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Licensed Child Care Facilities and Children in Subsidized Care, by Type

Washington County, June 2005

Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Statistical Bulletin.

20

6

7

0

21

0

14

3

13

6

36

0

85

0

424

45

Homes

1 Star

1+ Star

2 Star

3 Star

Centers

1 Star

1+ Star

2 Star

3 Star

01020304050

Facilities

0 100 200 300 400 500

Children in Subsidized Care

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Page 80: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Child Deaths Due to Abuse and NeglectOklahoma, Fiscal Years 1978 - 2004

Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Children & Family Services Division.

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Deaths 7 5 12 13 18 21 16 16 24 31 23 25 18 38 20 23 31 34 29 42 45 47 48 38 35 27 51

Page 81: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Child Deaths Due to Abuse and Neglect, by Age of Child

Oklahoma, FY 2004

Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Children & Family Services Division.

Under 145.1%

1-227.5%

3-621.6%

7-113.9%

12 & older2.0%

Page 82: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Child Abuse and NeglectWashington County, FY 2004

Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services.

1,118

609

224

Reports of abuseor neglect

Reports accepted for investigation or assessment

Children confirmedabused or neglected

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400Washington Co.

Page 83: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Age of Children of Confirmed Abuse and NeglectOklahoma, FY 2004

Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services.

9.3%

16.3%

27.1%

23.8% 23.6%

Under 1 1-2 3-6 7-11 12 & older0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Page 84: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Perpetrators of Confirmed Abuse and NeglectTop 6, Oklahoma, FY 2004

Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services.

46.4%

27.9%

7.7% 6.6%3.8%

1.3%

Mother Father Stepparent No relation Grandparent Foster parent0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Page 85: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Participation in Public Assistance ProgramsNumber of Participants and Percentage of Population Participating

Washington County, June 2005

Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Statistical Bulletin, June 2005; Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2003-2004; Pop. Estimates Division - U.S. Census Bureau.

1,335

3,688

4,636

115

2,556

752

46.1%

31.8%

9.4%

1%

30.7%

9%

Medicaid <5

Medicaid <18

Food Stamps Total

TANF <18

School Free Lunch

School Reduced Lunch

01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,000

Number of Participants

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Percent of Population

Page 86: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Elementary School Students Eligible for Free and Reduced Lunch Program

By School District, Washington County, 2003-2004 School Year

Source: Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2003-2004.

38.4%

42.4%

38.7%

38.4%

29.1%

10.6%

12.7%

12.9%

10.1%

9.1%

Washington Co.total

Dewey

Caney Valley

Bartlesville

Copan

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent of Students Eligible

Free Reduced

Free lunch eligibility requirement: annual household income below 130% of poverty, which currently is $20,371 for a family of three.

Reduced lunch eligibility requirement: annual household income below 185% of poverty, which currently is $28,990 for a family of three.

Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

Page 87: Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa

If you have questions or are interested in having the Community Profile presented to your organization, please contact

Ginny Utter at the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa at 918-585-5551 or [email protected].

Please visit our website csctulsa.org for more presentations and reports on a wide array of human services topics.

Community Profile is a product of the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa.