prepared by the community service council of greater tulsa
TRANSCRIPT
Bartlesville Regional United Waywith Emphasis on Washington County
Community Profile 2005
Prepared b y The Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Bartlesville Regional United WayCommunity Profile 2005
Human Investment IndustryDemographic TrendsImplications for the Community
���
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
The Human Investment Industry and the Challenges it Faces
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
What is the Human Investment Industry in BRUW Service Areas ?
Independent and collective action to address the education, health, housing, family support, emergency financial, and transportation needs of families and individuals in BRUW service areas.
Increasingly these efforts seek to prevent needs through promoting increased self-sufficiency among the communities' people while still intervening to respond to crises and other concerns.
�
�
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
The Roots of the Challenge Thirty Years of Economic and Social Changes
Emergence of new persistent poor in late 1960's and early 1970's
Massive loss of low skill/high pay jobs
Sharp rise in working poor
Decline in young male workers' wages
Increase in female headed families
Increase in substance abuse
>
>
>
>
>
>
All trends disproportionately impact African-Americans and families with young children.
04/22/2304/22/23 Prepared by the Community ServiPrepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsace Council of Greater Tulsa
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Source: Hodgkinson, Harold, "The Client," Education Demographer, 1988.
1900 - 1940 1940 - 1990 1990 - ?0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Poor - 75%
Poor - 20%Poor - 10%
Rich - 20%
Middle - 60%
Rich - 5% Rich - 10%
Middle - 20%
Middle - 80%
The trend: housing patterns and income mirror the job structure, with more rich, more poor, and fewer in the middle -- the "hourglass effect"
The “Shrinking Middle Class” with Greater Dependence on the Local Communities
Washington CountyDemographic Trends
Population change--out-migration of 19-64 years oldsAge--aging populationRace and Ethnicity--more culturally diverseLiving arrangements--poor but stable
>
>>>
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
N
EW
S
Bartlesville
PawhuskaNowata
Dewey
Copan
Ramona
Lenapah
Vera
Delaware
Wann
Ochelata
74056
74048
7402274072
74003
74027
74006
74061
74083
74029
74051
74042
Osage
Nowata
Wash ington
Bartlesville Regional United Way (Oklahoma part)
BRUW
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Population of Washington County and Bartlesville
1980, 1990, 2000, 2003 (est.), 2010 [est.] and 2020 [est.]
Source: U. S. Bureau of the Census.
48,113 48,066 48,996 49,121 49,718 50,777
34,568 34,256 34,748 34,710 35,250 36,030
1980 1990 2000 2003 2010 20200
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
Bartlesville
Washington Co.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Trends in Age Distribution, Washington County1990, 2000, 2003 (est.), 2010 (proj.) and 2020 (proj.)
Source: U. S. Bureau of the Census.
1990 2000 2003(est.)
2010(proj.)
2020(proj.)
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0-4 3,255 2,918 2,894 3,228 3,280
5-17 9,170 9,345 8,709 7,898 8,401
18-24 3,563 3,794 4,735 5,156 4,241
25-64 24,289 24,239 24,014 24,356 24,250
65-84 6,991 7,651 7,624 7,486 8,838
85+ 798 1,049 1,145 1,594 1,767
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa (1/2004).
Population by Age GroupTulsa, Washington, Osage and Nowata Counties, 2000
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
Tulsa
Washington
Nowata
Osage
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percent of population
0-4 5-17 18-24 25-64 65-84 85+
Tulsa Washington Nowata Osage
0-4 7.4 6 6.2 6.5
5-17 18.9 19.1 20.2 19.6
18-24 10 7.7 17.7 7.6
25-64 51.9 49.5 52.9 49
65-84 10.4 15.6 11.6 14.9
85+ 1.4 2.1 1.4 2.4
Race and Ethnicity Comparison for Children under 5 and Total Population
Oklahoma and Washington County, 2000
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census.
65.7%
9.5%
11.0%
1.3%
12.5%
71.1%
3.1%
12.3%
0.9%
12.6%
76.2%
7.6%
7.9%
1.4%
7.0%
81.2%2.5%
8.6%
0.7%
7.0%
White Black American Indian Asian Other/2+ races
Hispanic9.7%
Oklahoma Washington County
Hispanic5.0%
Under 5
Total Population
Hispanic5.2%
Hispanic2.6%
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Ratio of Income to Poverty LevelPercentage of Total Population and Selected Age Groups
Washington County, 1999
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000.
Total population
Under 5 5-17 Under 18 18-64 65 & older0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Percentage of population
Below 100% Below 130% Below 185%
Below 100% 11.9% 24.3% 13.9% 16.3% 11.2% 7.8%
Below 130% 17.5% 33.3% 20.7% 23.6% 15.9% 14.2%
Below 185% 28.8% 47.6% 33.9% 37.1% 25.7% 27%
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Implications for the Community
Implications for the communityImplications for the community
Services for the aging populationServices for the aging population Employment to attract and retain young professionalsEmployment to attract and retain young professionals Culturally diverse servicesCulturally diverse services Services for young families that are fragileServices for young families that are fragile Services to maintain teen engagement in educationServices to maintain teen engagement in education Early childhood supportsEarly childhood supports
Services for the aging populationServices for the aging population
There is an increase in 65 to 85 year olds greater than There is an increase in 65 to 85 year olds greater than the 25 to 64 year olds.the 25 to 64 year olds.
The population will be disproportionately living alone The population will be disproportionately living alone especially women.especially women.
A small amount of the population will continue to work.A small amount of the population will continue to work. The health of the population coming into retirement is The health of the population coming into retirement is
poor.poor. Disability indicators for the aging population is growing.Disability indicators for the aging population is growing.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Trends in Age Distribution, Washington County1990, 2000, 2003 (est.), 2010 (proj.) and 2020 (proj.)
Source: U. S. Bureau of the Census.
1990 2000 2003(est.)
2010(proj.)
2020(proj.)
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
18-24 3,563 3,794 4,735 5,156 4,241
25-64 24,289 24,239 24,014 24,356 24,250
65-84 6,991 7,651 7,624 7,486 8,838
85+ 798 1,049 1,145 1,594 1,767
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Living Arrangements of Persons Age 65 & OlderWashington County, 2000
Source: U. S. Census Bureau, Census 2000.
30.2%
65.0%
3.7%1.0%
Live alone Family households Group quarters Other
77.6% of those living alone are women
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Labor Force Participation among Persons Age 65 & OlderWashington County, 2000
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
94710.9%
7,73889.1% Employed
Unemployed
918 (96.9%)
29 (3.1%)
NOT in labor force
In labor force
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Report Card on HealthOklahoma and United States, 2002
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Report Card on Health, 2004.
85.6%
58.7%
22.9%
30.5%
30.6%
16.9%
26.6%
77.4%
59.2%
22.2%
31.2%
24.4%
11%
23%
Eat <5 fruits/vegetables per day
Overweight
Obese
HS students inactive
Adults inactive
Youth smokers
Adult smokers
0%25%50%75%100% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Oklahoma U.S.
F
C
C
F
F
F
(na)
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Mortality Rates for the Three Leading Causes of DeathOklahoma, 1930 - 2000
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health.
1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 20000
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400Rate per 100,000 persons
Heart Disease
Cancer
Stroke
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
What is a Disability?
Source: ARC-USA, 2000; Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA); Developmental Services Division (DDSD), Oklahoma Department of Human Services (DHS), 2000; National Organization on Disability (NOD), 2000; U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2001, Americans with Disabilities: 1997 .
A person is considered to have a disability if he or she has difficulty performing certain functions (e.g., seeing, hearing, talking, walking, climbing stairs, lifting and carrying, etc.), or has difficulty performing activities of daily living, or has difficulty with certain social roles (e.g., doing school work for children, working at a job and around the house for adults, etc.).
– A person who is unable to perform one or more activities, or who uses some type of assistive technology to improve daily participation in all aspects of work, school and community life, or who needs assistance from another person to perform basic activities is considered to have a severe disability.
–
1 in 5 Americans have some level of disability.1 in 8 Americans have a severe disability.1 in 9 children age 6 to 14 have a disability.
*
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Disability Prevalence by Age and Level of DisabilityOklahoma, 1997
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2001, Americans with Disabilities: 1997 (Aug.-Nov. 1997 data from Survey of Income and Program Participation).
2%
3.4%
11.2%
10.7%
13.4%
22.6%
35.7%
49%
73.6%
4.8%
5.3%
8.1%
13.9%
24.2%
31.8%
57.6%
0 to 2
3 to 5
6 to 14
15-24
25-44
45-54
55-64
65-79
80+
Age Group
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percent with Specified Level of Disability
Level of disabilityAny Severe
Employment to attract and retain young Employment to attract and retain young professionalsprofessionals
The 25-64 year olds population is declining in the The 25-64 year olds population is declining in the twenty year trend. twenty year trend.
Labor market participation primarily white collar but Labor market participation primarily white collar but poverty levels indicate a blue collar economy.poverty levels indicate a blue collar economy.
The unemployment rate does not reflect the real The unemployment rate does not reflect the real picture.picture.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Trends in Age Distribution, Washington County1990, 2000, 2003 (est.), 2010 (proj.) and 2020 (proj.)
Source: U. S. Bureau of the Census.
1990 2000 2003(est.)
2010(proj.)
2020(proj.)
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
18-24 3,563 3,794 4,735 5,156 4,241
25-64 24,289 24,239 24,014 24,356 24,250
65-84 6,991 7,651 7,624 7,486 8,838
85+ 798 1,049 1,145 1,594 1,767
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Labor Force Participation among Adults, Age 20-64Washington County, 2000
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
20,06274.7%
6,78525.3%
In armed forces
Employed
Unemployed
6 (0.0%)
19,218 (95.8%)
838 (4.2%)
NOT in labor force
In labor force
Current unemployment rate for all ages (March 2005) = 4.4%
61.2% of jobs are white collar 38.8% are blue collar (2004 est.)
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Family Income DistributionTulsa, Washington, Osage and Nowata Counties, 1999
Source: U. S. Census Bureau, Census 2000.
60,283 (40.7%)
68,178 (46.0%)
19,728 (13.3%)
6,377 (45.0%)
5,950 (42.0%)
1,855 (13.1%)
6,011 (48.7%)
5,486 (44.5%)
835 (6.8%)
1,694 (57.0%)
1,165 (39.2%)
111 (3.7%)
<$40,000 $40,000-$99,999 $100,000+
Tulsa County Washington County
Osage County Nowata County
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Unemployment RatesWashington County, 1992 - 2005
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
'92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 Mar.'05
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
Rate 6.3% 7.0% 6.4% 5.7% 4.7% 3.8% 3.9% 4.0% 3.5% 3.3% 4.6% 6.1% 5.7% 4.4%
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Participation in Public Assistance ProgramsNumber of Participants and Percentage of Population Participating
Washington County, June 2005
Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Statistical Bulletin, June 2005; Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2003-2004; Pop. Estimates Division - U.S. Census Bureau.
1,335
3,688
4,636
115
2,556
752
46.1%
31.8%
9.4%
1%
30.7%
9%
Medicaid <5
Medicaid <18
Food Stamps Total
TANF <18
School Free Lunch
School Reduced Lunch
01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,000
Number of Participants
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Percent of Population
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Median Family IncomeBy Family Type and Presence of Children under 18
Washington County, 1999
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000.
$41,362
$51,118
$17,636
$23,920
$45,620
$47,970
$34,795
$32,708
Washington County
All families
Married-couple families
Female-headed families
Male-headed families
$0$20,000$40,000$60,000
Families WITH children
$0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000
Families WITHOUT children
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Ratio of Income to Poverty LevelNumber of Persons: Total Population and Selected Age Groups
Washington County, 1999
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000.
All Income Levels
100% of poverty level
130% of poverty
level
185% of poverty
level
Total population 48,225 5,739 8,456 13,894
Under 5 years 2,806 683 933 1,337
5-17 years 9,304 1,293 1,929 3,157
Under 18 years 12,110 1,976 2,862 4,494
18-64 years 27,760 3,110 4,407 7,148
65 & older 8,355 653 1,187 2,252
Poverty Status by Family Type & Age of Related ChildrenWashington County, 1999
Source: U. S. Census Bureau, Census 2000.
4.8%
7.2%
11.7%
12.8%
4.4%
29.3%
36.6%
55%
52.7%
29.1%
20%
24.5%
44.6%
48.7%
13.6%
Married-coupleTotal
with children <18
with children <5 only
with children <5 & 5-17
with children 5-17 only
Female-headedTotal
with children <18
with children <5 only
with children <5 & 5-17
with children 5-17 only
Male-headedTotal
with children <18
with children <5 only
with children <5 & 5-17
with children 5-17 only
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%Percent below Poverty
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Educational Attainment for Persons Age 25 & OlderWashington County, 2000
Source: U. S. Census Bureau, Census 2000.
14.8%
32.1%
21.7%
5.6%
16.6%
6.3%
1.6%
1.4%
Less than high school
High school graduate
Some college
Associate degree
Bachelor's degree
Master's degree
Professional school degree
Doctorate degree
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Percent of persons 25+
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Real Hourly Wage by Educational AttainmentUnited States, 1973-2003
Source: Economic Policy Institute website.
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35Real hourly wage (2003 dollars)
Less than high school High school College degree Advanced degree
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Occupied Housing Units by Tenure and by Length of Residence
Washington County, 2000
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census.
Owner-occupied74.0% Renter-occupied
26.0%
15 months or less10.6%
16 months to 5 years23.4%
More than 5 years66.1%
15 months or less43.1%
16 months to 5 years36.2%
More than 5 years20.6%
Tenure
Owner-Occupied Housing Units
Renter-Occupied Housing Units
Length of Residence
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Occupied Housing Units by Tenure and by Length of Residence
For Householders Age 65 & OlderWashington County, 2000
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census.
Owner-occupied84.8% Renter-occupied
15.2%
15 months or less3.2%
16 months to 5 years10.7%
More than 5 years86.1%
15 months or less22.0%
16 months to 5 years38.2%
More than 5 years39.7%
Tenure
Owner-Occupied Housing Units
Renter-Occupied Housing Units
Length of Residence
Culturally diverse servicesCulturally diverse services
The population is becoming more culturally diverse with The population is becoming more culturally diverse with a growth in the Hispanic population.a growth in the Hispanic population.
The births in 2003 to women of Hispanic origin are The births in 2003 to women of Hispanic origin are twice the population rate.twice the population rate.
The estimated trend for 2010 is that 15% of births will The estimated trend for 2010 is that 15% of births will be to women of Hispanic origin.be to women of Hispanic origin.
Race and Ethnicity Comparison for Population Age Groups
Under 19, 19-64 and 65 & OlderWashington County, 2000
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census.
73.1%
3.2% 12.2%0.8%
10.7%
81.8%
2.6%8.4%
0.9%6.3%
91.1%
1.1%3.8%
0.1%3.9%
White Black American Indian Asian Other/2+ races
Hispanic: 4.1%
Under 19
Hispanic: 2.5%
19-64
Hispanic: 1.0%
65 & Older
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
04/22/2304/22/23 Prepared by the Community ServiPrepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsace Council of Greater Tulsa
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Births by Race and Ethnicity of MotherWashington County, 2003
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health
50781.8%
203.2%
8613.9%
71.1%
White Black Amer. Indian Other
Washington County(total births=623)
Hispanic origin: 29 (4.7%), 2010 (est. ) 15%
Services for young families that are Services for young families that are fragilefragile
There is a decline in married couple households.There is a decline in married couple households. This particularly effects the African-American and This particularly effects the African-American and
Native American families.Native American families. There is a large gap in wages and livable income.There is a large gap in wages and livable income. There is a large number who do not have health There is a large number who do not have health
insurance or are on Medicaid.insurance or are on Medicaid. The number of births receiving prenatal care early is The number of births receiving prenatal care early is
good.good. The number of births to unmarried women are The number of births to unmarried women are
increasingincreasing
And……..And……..
There is a decline in teen parenting but it is still very There is a decline in teen parenting but it is still very high as a percentage of total births.high as a percentage of total births.
There is a decline in infant mortality but it is still high.There is a decline in infant mortality but it is still high. There is a decline in domestic violence but it is still There is a decline in domestic violence but it is still
high.high.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Living Arrangements of Children Under 18Washington County, 1990 and 2000
Source: U. S. Bureau of the Census.
Married Couple Male-headed Female-headed Other relatives0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1990 77.6% 2.8% 13.7% 4.4%
2000 71.3% 4.6% 16.3% 5.9%
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Types of Families with Own Children Under 18,by Race & Hispanic Origin
Washington County, 2000
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census.
4,59674.7%
1,19919.5%
3575.8%
3,79476.4%
88817.9%
2815.7%
9050.6%
7240.4%
169.0%
41271.0%
13823.8%
305.2%
4085.1%
612.8%
12.1%
11476.5%
2718.1%
85.4%
Married couple Female-headed Male-headed
Total White Black
American Indian Asian Hispanic
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
The Self-Sufficiency Standard...
...The level of income requiredfor a family to meet its needs on its own.
Source: Wider Opportunities for Women, with Community Action Project of Tulsa County, 2002, "The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma."
Customized by specific family compositionCustomized by geographic locationBased on all expense categoriesUpdated annually using consumer price index
>>>>
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Self-Sufficiency
Wage(annual)
Poverty Guidelines
(annual)
Dollar Difference
Self-SufficiencyPercent of
Poverty
One person
$15,276 $9,570 $5,706 159.6%
Two persons
$24,995 $12,830 $12,165 194.8%
Three persons
$30,385 $16,090 $14,295 188.8%
Four persons
$39,237 $19,350 $19,887 202.8%
Comparison of Self-Sufficiency Wage to Poverty Guidelines, by Size of Family
Washington County, 2005
Source: Wider Opportunities for Women, with Community Action Project of Tulsa County, "The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma;" Federal Register, February 18, 2005.
($4.60 per hour)
($6.17 per hour)
($7.74 per hour)
($9.30 per hour)
($7.34 per hour)
($12.02 per hour)
($14.61 per hour)
($18.86 per hour)
Notes: For the self-sufficiency wages shown in table, family of two consists of one adult and one preschooler; family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child; family of four consists of two adults, one preschooler and one schoolage child. Per hour wages given assume pay for 40 hours per week for 52 weeks.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Family of Three, Washington County, 2005
Source: Wider Opportunities for Women, with Community Action Project of Tulsa Tulsa County, "The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma;" Federal Register, February 18, 2005; Oklahoma State Dept. of Human Services; Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census.
$8,220$10,712
$16,090
$29,767
$41,362
WelfareWage
MinimumWage
PovertyWage
185% PovertyWage
Median FamilyIncome
(2000 Census)
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000Annual Wage
Self-Sufficiency Wage = $30,385 ($14.61/hr.)
Note: For the self-sufficiency wage, family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child.The hourly wages given assume employment at 40 hours per week and 52 weeks per year.
Comparison of Wages: Self-Sufficiency, Welfare, Minimum, Poverty, 185% of Poverty, and Median Family Income
Married-couple w/ kids: $51,118
Male-headed w/ kids: $23,920
Female-headed w/ kids: $17,636
All families
($3.95/hr.)($5.15/hr.)
($7.74/hr.)
($14.31/hr.)
($19.89/hr.)
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Monthly Budget Distribution for Typical Family of Three Earning Self-Sufficiency Wage
Washington County, 2005
Source: Wider Opportunities for Women, "The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma."
Housing$470
Child Care$616
Food$396
Transportation$207
Health Care$249
Miscellaneous$194
Taxes$181
20%
27%
17%
9%
11%
8%8%
Notes: Family of three in this example consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child. Current self-sufficiency wage for a family of three of this composition is $2,532 per month.
Health Insurance Status, by TypeWashington County, 2001
Source: Oklahoma Health Care Authority.
29,610 (60.2%)
4,428 (9.0%)
8,856 (18.0%)6,306 (12.8%)
Private Medicaid Medicare Uninsured
13% of adults (4,953) and 11% of children (1,353) in Washington County are uninsured.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Resident Births, by Trimester of Entry into Prenatal CareWashington County, 1980, 1990, 2000 and 2003
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health.
658 (85.7%)
85 (11.1%)
12 (1.6%) 4 (0.5%)9 (1.2%)
544 (83.6%)
69 (10.6%)
10 (1.5%)5 (0.8%)
23 (3.5%)
489 (82.5%)
56 (9.4%)
8 (1.3%)
40 (6.7%)542 (87.0%)
74 (11.9%)
3 (0.5%)4 (0.6%)
1st trimester 2nd trimester 3rd trimester No care Unknown
1980 1990
2000 2003
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Resident Births by Marital Status of MotherWashington County, 1980, 1990, 2000 and 2003
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health.
715
527
416 410
49
124177
213
1980 1990 2000 20030
200
400
600
800
Number of births
Single Married
% Single 6.4 19 29.8 34.2
% Married 93.6 81 70.2 65.8
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Resident Births to Women under Age 20Washington County 1980 - 2003
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health.
'80 '81 '82 '83 '84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '030
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Number of births
Washington Co.
Washington Co. 80 111 100 109 91 89 84 67 69 84 81 94 99 83 76 86 81 84 77 84 92 96 78 73
Infant Mortality Rates Washington County
3-Year Averages, 1980 through 2003
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health
1980
-82
1981
-83
1982
-84
1983
-85
1984
-86
1985
-87
1986
-88
1987
-89
1988
-90
1989
-91
1990
-92
1991
-93
1992
-94
1993
-95
1994
-96
1995
-97
1996
-98
1997
-99
1998
-00
1999
-1
2000
-2
2001
-3
0
5
10
15
20
Number of infant deaths per 1,000 live births
Washington Co.
“Healthy People 2010” goal = 5 per 1,000
2001-03 Total Infant Deaths:
Washington Co.: 13 (7.3/1,000)
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Domestic Violence Cases Reported toLaw Enforcement Agencies
Oklahoma, 1994 - 2003
Source: Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation 2003 Uniform Crime Report.
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 20030
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
Cases 18,153 18,621 21,683 23,087 21,435 21,211 22,065 23,687 25,157 23,773
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Domestic Violence Cases Reported to Law Enforcement Agencies, by Offense
Oklahoma, 2003
Source: Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation 2003 Uniform Crime Report.
57 406
5,282
18,028
Homicides Violent sex crimes Felony assaults Felony assaults& battery
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
A total of 23,773 domestic violence cases were reported to Oklahoma law enforcement agencies in 2003.
Services to maintain teen engagement Services to maintain teen engagement in educationin education
Teens are disconnected from education.Teens are disconnected from education. Teens are disconnected from the work force.Teens are disconnected from the work force. Teens are engaged in substance use.Teens are engaged in substance use. Teens are becoming parents.Teens are becoming parents. Teens are committing suicide.Teens are committing suicide. HIV and AIDS is high in Oklahoma.HIV and AIDS is high in Oklahoma.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Percentage of Change in Average Daily Membership for 9th to 12th Grade Classes 2001 to 2004
Washington County School Districts
Source: Oklahoma Department of Education, 2005
Bartlesville Caney Valley Copan Dewey Washington Co.
0%
5%
-5%
-10%
-15%
-20%
-25%
-30%
-35%
2001 -19.1% -5.6% -11% -32.1% -19.6%
2002 -18.3 -15.3 0.3 -28.9 -19.2
2003 -17.1% -10.8% -24.9% -33.9% -19.8%
2004 -11.7% -16% -1.7% -33.7% -15.1%
Note: County ranking shown at top of bars (#1=best, #77=worst).
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Labor Force Participation among Youths, Age 16-19Washington County, 2000
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
1,44553.1%
1,27846.9%
In armed forces
Employed
Unemployed
2 (0.1%)
1,213 (83.9%)
230 (15.9%)
NOT in labor force
In labor force
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Disconnected Youth: Percent of Youth Age 16-19 Not in School and Not Working
By County and Oklahoma, 2000
Source: Oklahoma KIDS COUNT Factbook 2004.
Tulsa Washington Oklahoma State0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
Percent 9.7% 9.2% 9.3%
Number 3,090 262 19,758
Note: County ranking shown at top of bars (#1=best, #77=worst).
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Teen Mothers and Poor Birth Outcomes
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Maternal, Infant and Child Health, 1997 Selected Demographic Information.
Risk Factor Teen Moms
Oklahoma ranked 8th in the nation in rate of births to teens in 2002.
42% higher20% lower81% higher86% higher2.7 times higher2.3 times higher23% higher30% higher
Low birth weight1st Trimester prenatal care3rd Trimester prenatal care
No prenatal careUnmarried
Short interval births (<24 months)Premature births (>3 weeks early)
Birth complications
Women under age 20, "teens," are more at risk of poor birth outcomes than are women age 20 & older.
*
Characteristics of Births to Teen MothersBy County and Oklahoma 3-year average 2001-03
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health
71.5%
0.8%
52.4%
6.1%
0.4%
18.4%
2.9%
79.7%
10.7%
20.6%
8.6%
1.2%
20.6%
3.9%
75.2%
6.8%
20.7%
7.9%
1.4%
20.7%
3.4%
Unmarried
Poor prenatal care
Mother w/ <12thgrade education
Low birthweight(1500-2499 grams)
Very low birthweight(<1500 grams)
1+ previous births
2+ previous births
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percent of Teen Births
Washington Co. Tulsa Co. Oklahoma
Notse: Teen mothers include females age 15 to 19. Teen birth rates represent the number of teen births per 100,000 females age 15 to 19. "Poor prenatal care" = entering prenatal care in 3rd trimester or receiving no prenatal care.
Washington County: births to teens: 82 teen birth rate: 45.2Tulsa County: births to teens: 1,110 teen birth rate: 58.5Oklahoma: births to teens: 6,973 teen birth rate: 55.8
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Resident Births to Teens Age 15-17 and 18-19Washington County, 1980, 1990, 2000 and 2003
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health.
1980 1990 2000 20030
20
40
60
80
Number of births
0
40
80
120
160Birth rate
Births 15-17 22 35 25 22
Births 18-19 57 46 66 51
Birth rate 15-17 18.8 35 21.5 20.7
Birth rate 18-19 83.1 87.6 109.1 68.8
Note: Teen birth rate is the number of births to females age 15-19 per 1,000 females age 15-19.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Birth Rates for Women under Age 20Washington County 1980 - 2003
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health.
'80 '81 '82 '83 '84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '030
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Birth rate
Washington Co.
Washington Co. 22.6 30.6 27 29.5 25.4 25.2 24.7 20.5 21.5 26.7 25.1 28.5 29.7 24.8 22.4 24.8 23.2 23.7 21.6 23.5 25.8 26.7 21.7 20.7
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Current* Youth Tobacco Use by School Level and Tobacco Product
Oklahoma, 1999 and 2002
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Oklahoma Youth Tobacco Surveys, 1999 and 2002.
21%
17%
6%
9%
5%
42%
33%
13%
20%
5%
16%
10%
5%
8%
4%
32%
24%
10%
16%
5%
Middle School
Any tobacco
Cigarettes
Smokeless tobacco
Cigars
Pipe tobacco
High School
Any tobacco
Cigarettes
Smokeless tobacco
Cigars
Pipe tobacco
0%10%20%30%40%50% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
1999 2002
* Used 1 or more times during the 30 days prior to survey.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Substance Abuse Among High School StudentsOklahoma and U.S., 2003
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Oklahoma Youth Risk Behavior Survey, 2003; Centers for Disease Control, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System, 2003.
47.8%
22%
9.9%
9.2%
9.9%
44.9%
22.4%
12.1%
8.7%
7.6%
Alcohol
Marijuana
Inhalants
Cocaine
Methamphetamine
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Percent Reporting Use
Oklahoma
U.S.
Used once or more during
prior 30 days...
Ever used...
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Methamphetamine Labs Seized by AuthoritiesOklahoma, 1994 - 2004
Source: Oklahoma State Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs Website.
10 34125
241 275
781
946
1,1931,254 1,235
812
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 20040
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400Number of labs discovered
Suicide Rates Among Persons of All AgesSuicide Rates Among Persons of All Ages
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Oklahoma, 1930 - 2003
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health; National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics Report.
1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 20030
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16Rate per 100,000 persons
Rate 9.3 1,0.1 8 6.4 8.3 9 9.8 9.5 1,0.7 1,5.2 1,3.6 1,4.8 1,3.3 1,4.6 1,4.7 1,2.6
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Cumulative Total of Oklahomans Living with HIV and AIDSBy Year, 1990 to 2004
Source: Oklahoma State Dept. of Health, "HIV/AIDS Statistics."
150
200
300
550
750
850
1,05
0
1,25
9
1,35
9
1,40
6
1,45
1
1,59
7
1,72
9
1,90
5
1,85
9
450 70
0 950 1,
100
1,25
0
1,45
0
1,65
0
1,79
6
1,98
0
2,07
3
2,20
9
2,39
4
2,45
8
2,52
9
2,44
2
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 20040
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000Number of persons living with HIV and AIDS
AIDS HIV
Early childhood supportsEarly childhood supports
Early brain development recognized as key to reducing Early brain development recognized as key to reducing adverse effects in childhood and adolescence.adverse effects in childhood and adolescence.
Top risk factors present in Washington County at birth Top risk factors present in Washington County at birth and during early years.and during early years.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Importance of Brain Development for Children 0-3
Excerpt from: "The First Years Last Forever: I am Your Child"
Eighty percent of brain development occurs by age three.
Early experiences help to determine brain structure, thus shaping the way people learn, think, and behave for the rest of their lives.
The outside world shapes the brain's wiring.
The outside world is experienced through the senses - seeing, hearing, smelling, touching, and tasting - enabling the brain to create or modify connections.
Relationships with consistent caregivers early in life are the major source of development of the emotional and social parts of the brain.
Principles of Brain Development
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Top Risk Factors for Young Children Age 0-4
Low-income and poverty
Teen mother, especially those with more than one child
Absent father
Short spacing between births (less than 24 months)
Parent, especially the mother, without a high school education
Lack of positive emotional, physical and intellectual experiences
>
>
>
>
>
>
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Risk Factors Increase Likelihood of Both Immediate and Longer
Term Adverse Outcomes
Immediate Adverse Outcomes:Poor healthPoor developmentAbuseLack of school readiness
Longer Term Adverse Outcomes:Juvenile delinquencySubstance abuseTeen pregnancySchool dropoutLower earnings
�––––
�–––––
*
Summary of Risk Factors for InfantsWashington and Tulsa Counties and Oklahoma 3-year average 2001-03
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health.
13.9%
32.7%
1.7%
19.4%
5.7%
0.9%
25.6%
13.9%
11.9%
36.7%
6.8%
23.5%
6.7%
1.2%
34.3%
19.6%
13.7%
37.1%
4.7%
23.2%
6.6%
1.2%
32.2%
17.9%
Teen mother(age 15-19)
Unmarried mother
Poor prenatal care
Mother w/ <12th gradeeducation
Low birthweight(1500-2499 grams)
Very low birthweight(<1500 grams)
Short birth spacing(<24 mos. apart)
Very short birth spacing(<18 mos. apart)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Percent of Births
Notes: "Poor pranatal care" = entering prenatal care in 3rd trimester or receiving no prenatal care.
Washington County births: 591Tulsa County births: 9,357Oklahoma births: 50,874
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Impact of Poverty on Early Brain DevelopmentMultiple Pathways
Source: National Center for Children in Poverty.
Inadequate Nutrition
Substance Abuse
Lack of Mother-ChildConnection due to
Maternal Depression
Exposure toEnvironmental Toxins
Trauma/Abuse
Quality of Daily Care
Inadequate Prenatal Care
Lack of Basic Health Care
Early BrainDevelopment
Poverty
Average Daily Membership and Percentage of Children Enrolled in Special Education, by School District
Washington County, School Year 2002-03
Source: Office of Accountability, Oklahoma State Department of Education.
6,021
834411
1,148
12.2%
15.7%
14.4%
12.9%
Bartlesville Caney Valley Copan Dewey
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
ADM
0%
4%
8%
12%
16%Percent in Special Education
ADM Percent in Special Education
Washington County total ADM=8,414; percentage in special education=12.7%
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Child Care Helps Shape Children's FuturesAnd is Key to School Readiness
Excerpt from: Children's Defense Fund, "Child Care Basics," 1999.
A recent major study found that children in high quality child care demonstrated greater mathematical ability, greater thinking and attention skills, and fewer behavioral problems. These differences held true for children from a range of family backgrounds, with particularly significant effects for children at risk.
Research shows that quality of child care has a lasting impact on children's well-being and ability to learn. Children in poor quality child care have been found to be delayed in language and reading skills, and display more aggression toward other children and adults.
*
Early Childhood (Pre-K) Enrollment, by School DistrictWashington County, October 2003
Source: Oklahoma Department of Education.
9
34
39
60
39
47
21
40
38
37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Copan
Dewey
Caney Valley
Richard Kane
Hoover
Jane Phillips
Oak Park
Ranch Heights
Wayside
Woodrow Wilson
010203040506070 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Half day Full day
Washington County total half day pre-K enrollment = 364; full day = 0.
An estimated 63% of all 4 years olds in Washington County are enrolled in public pre-K programs.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Licensed Child Care Facilities and Capacity, by TypeWashington County, December 2004
Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Licensing Services Statewide Star Activity Statistics Report.
6
6
0
1
13
3
61
57
0
58
714
222
Homes
1+ Star
2 Star
3 Star
Centers
1+ Star
2 Star
3 Star
051015
Facilities
0 200 400 600 800
Capacity
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Licensed Child Care Facilities and Children in Subsidized Care, by Type
Washington County, June 2005
Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Statistical Bulletin.
20
6
7
0
21
0
14
3
13
6
36
0
85
0
424
45
Homes
1 Star
1+ Star
2 Star
3 Star
Centers
1 Star
1+ Star
2 Star
3 Star
01020304050
Facilities
0 100 200 300 400 500
Children in Subsidized Care
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Child Deaths Due to Abuse and NeglectOklahoma, Fiscal Years 1978 - 2004
Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Children & Family Services Division.
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Deaths 7 5 12 13 18 21 16 16 24 31 23 25 18 38 20 23 31 34 29 42 45 47 48 38 35 27 51
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Child Deaths Due to Abuse and Neglect, by Age of Child
Oklahoma, FY 2004
Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Children & Family Services Division.
Under 145.1%
1-227.5%
3-621.6%
7-113.9%
12 & older2.0%
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Child Abuse and NeglectWashington County, FY 2004
Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services.
1,118
609
224
Reports of abuseor neglect
Reports accepted for investigation or assessment
Children confirmedabused or neglected
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400Washington Co.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Age of Children of Confirmed Abuse and NeglectOklahoma, FY 2004
Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services.
9.3%
16.3%
27.1%
23.8% 23.6%
Under 1 1-2 3-6 7-11 12 & older0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Perpetrators of Confirmed Abuse and NeglectTop 6, Oklahoma, FY 2004
Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services.
46.4%
27.9%
7.7% 6.6%3.8%
1.3%
Mother Father Stepparent No relation Grandparent Foster parent0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Participation in Public Assistance ProgramsNumber of Participants and Percentage of Population Participating
Washington County, June 2005
Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Statistical Bulletin, June 2005; Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2003-2004; Pop. Estimates Division - U.S. Census Bureau.
1,335
3,688
4,636
115
2,556
752
46.1%
31.8%
9.4%
1%
30.7%
9%
Medicaid <5
Medicaid <18
Food Stamps Total
TANF <18
School Free Lunch
School Reduced Lunch
01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,000
Number of Participants
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Percent of Population
Elementary School Students Eligible for Free and Reduced Lunch Program
By School District, Washington County, 2003-2004 School Year
Source: Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2003-2004.
38.4%
42.4%
38.7%
38.4%
29.1%
10.6%
12.7%
12.9%
10.1%
9.1%
Washington Co.total
Dewey
Caney Valley
Bartlesville
Copan
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percent of Students Eligible
Free Reduced
Free lunch eligibility requirement: annual household income below 130% of poverty, which currently is $20,371 for a family of three.
Reduced lunch eligibility requirement: annual household income below 185% of poverty, which currently is $28,990 for a family of three.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
If you have questions or are interested in having the Community Profile presented to your organization, please contact
Ginny Utter at the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa at 918-585-5551 or [email protected].
Please visit our website csctulsa.org for more presentations and reports on a wide array of human services topics.
Community Profile is a product of the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa.