presentation air pollution conference - pdf

Upload: vpolizzi

Post on 29-May-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    1/31

    The role of fungi, mycotoxins and volatile organiccompounds in indoor air pollution

    V. Polizzi 1, B. Delmulle 2, A. Adams 1, A. Moretti 3, Y. Rosseel 4, E. Adriaens 5, C. Van Peteghem 2, S. De Saeger 2

    and N. De Kimpe 1

    1Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Belgium.2Laboratory of Food Analysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium.

    3Institute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council, Bari, Italy 4Department of Data Analysis Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium

    5Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium

    1

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    2/31

    Overview

    1. Sick building syndrome (SBS) and its relation to fungalgrowth and metabolites

    2. Description of the procedure optimized for samplings inmould environments

    3. Results of indoor samplings

    4. Conclusions and recommendations

    2

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    3/31

    The Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) is described as a set of non-specific symptoms experienced by the occupants of a building withpoor indoor air quality (IAQ).

    SBS and its relation to fungal growth and MVOCs

    Eye IrritationDry ThroatRhinitis

    3

    Runny NoseHeadacheFatigueSkin IrritationShortness of BreathCoughDizzinessNauseaMental Confusion

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    4/31

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    5/31

    Airborne fungal metabolites as a concern for humanhealth

    Allergens

    Mycotoxins

    5

    Microbial volatile

    organic compounds(MVOCs)

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    6/31

    Some (M)VOCs have adverse effect onrespiratory system, blood vesselsystem, nerve system and may becarcinogenic (Yu et al., Int J Refrigerat , 2008) .

    (M)VOC odours are believed to have

    SBS and its relation to MVOCs

    an n uence on e per ormance opeople, causing mental and cognitivedistraction (Wolkoff et al., Indoor Air , 2006) .

    (M)VOCs may be indicative of fungalgrowth and/or mycotoxin production(Larsen and Frisvad, Mycol Res, 1995) .

    6

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    7/31

    Overview

    1. Sick building syndrome (SBS) and its relation to fungalgrowth and metabolites

    2. Description of the procedure optimized for samplings inmould environments

    3. Results of indoor samplings

    4. Conclusions and recommendations

    7

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    8/31

    8

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    9/31

    Optimized procedure for samplings in buildings

    Airborne Sample Analysis Platform(ASAP): for bioaerosol present in

    indoor airCyclone surface sampler: for dust

    Scalpel: for contaminated building

    Surface sampling through sterileswab and inoculation on 2 media

    9

    Solid Phase MicroExtraction (SPME) coupled with GC-MS analysisDynamic headspace with thermal desorption of tenax and GC-MS analysis

    Thermohygrometer for measurement of indoor temperature and relative humidity

    stick-to-it Exposition of Petridish to indoor airLC-MS/MS

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    10/31

    Overview

    1. Sick building syndrome (SBS) and its relation to fungalgrowth and metabolites

    2. Description of the procedure optimized for samplings inmould environments

    3. Results of indoor samplings

    4. Conclusions and recommendations

    10

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    11/31

    Mycotoxin analysis

    Mycotoxin Number of positive

    substratessamples

    Concentrationrange in

    substrates(ng/cm 3)

    Number of positive air

    samples

    Concentrationrange in air

    (ng/cm 3)

    Sterigmatocystin 28 0.063-778.4 3 0.0034-1.7674

    Roquefortin C 16 0.106-7.2 1 0.009-4

    Chaetoglobosin A 13 1.16-13830 3 0.0067-3.4205

    11

    Aflatoxin B 2 7 0.019-0.253 4 0.0003-0.0211

    Aflatoxin B 1 5 0.111-0.332 5 0.0024-0.1463

    Roridin E 0 0 3 0.0031-0.082

    Ochratoxin A 7 0.008-0.773 3 0.0115-0.228

    62 out of 99 samples showed presence of one or more mycotoxins afterLC-MS/MS analysis

    Polizzi et al., J Environ Monit , 2009

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    12/31

    Mycotoxin analysis

    Mycotoxin Number of positive

    substratessamples

    Concentrationrange in

    substrates(ng/cm 3)

    Number of positive air

    samples

    Concentrationrange in air

    (ng/cm 3)

    Sterigmatocystin 28 0.063-778.4 3 0.0034-1.7674

    Roquefortin C 16 0.106-7.2 1 0.009-4

    Chaetoglobosin A 13 1.16-13830 3 0.0067-3.4205

    12

    Aflatoxin B 2 7 0.019-0.253 4 0.0003-0.0211

    Aflatoxin B 1 5 0.111-0.332 5 0.0024-0.1463

    Roridin E 0 0 3 0.0031-0.082

    Ochratoxin A 7 0.008-0.773 3 0.0115-0.228

    62 out of 99 samples showed presence of one or more mycotoxins afterLC-MS/MS analysis

    Polizzi et al., J Environ Monit , 2009

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    13/31

    Observed counts Expected countsAir Wallpaper Mycelium Dust Silicone Air Wallpaper Mycelium Dust Silicone

    STERO Present 3 15 4 9 0 6 10 7 7 0.5Absent 9 5 10 4 1 6 10 7 6 0.5

    CHAETO Present 3 2 11 0 0 3 5 4 3.5 0.3Absent 9 18 3 13 1 9 15 10 9.5 0.7

    ROQC Present 1 7 7 2 0 3 6 4 3 0.3Absent 11 13 7 11 1 9 14 10 10 0.8

    The incidence of the detected mycotoxins on eachspecific type of sample

    13

    AFB2

    Present 4 0 0 7 0 2 4 3 2 0.2Absent 8 20 14 6 1 10 16 11 11 0.8

    AFB1 Present 5 0 3 1 1 2 3 2 2 0.2Absent 7 20 11 12 0 10 17 12 11 0.8

    RORE Present 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0.1Absent 9 20 14 13 1 11 19 13 12 0.9

    OTA Present 3 0 0 7 0 2 3 2 2 0.2

    Absent 9 20 14 6 1 10 17 12 11 0.8

    observed counts against the expected counts assuming the null hypothesis(there is no association between mycotoxin incidence and type of sample)

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    14/31

    Assessment of the correlation between the incidenceof a specific mycotoxin and the type of sample

    P-value Pearson residuals

    Air Wallpaper Mycelium Dust SiliconeSTERO 0.00629 -1.29 1.45 -1.2 0.88 -0.72

    CHAETO < 0.0001 -0.11 -1.44 3.76 -1.86 -0.52ROQC 0.102 -1.3 0.5 1.52 -0.88 -0.53

    14

    . . - . - . . - .

    AFB1 0.0016 2.12 -1.82 0.43 -0.79 2RORE 0.0336 3.10 -1.00 -0.84 -0.81 -0.22OTA < 0.0001 0.71 -1.83 -1.53 3.28 -0.41

    Positive values for Pearson residuals indicate that moreincidences are observed than expected

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    15/31

    Assessment of the correlation between the incidenceof a specific mycotoxin and the type of sample

    P-value Pearson residuals

    Air Wallpaper Mycelium Dust SiliconeSTERO 0.00629 -1.29 1.45 -1.2 0.88 -0.72

    CHAETO < 0.0001 -0.11 -1.44 3.76 -1.86 -0.52ROQC 0.102 -1.3 0.5 1.52 -0.88 -0.53

    15

    . . - . - . . - .

    AFB1 0.0016 2.12 -1.82 0.43 -0.79 2RORE 0.0336 3.10 -1.00 -0.84 -0.81 -0.22OTA < 0.0001 0.71 -1.83 -1.53 3.28 -0.41

    Positive values for Pearson residuals indicate that moreincidences are observed than expected

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    16/31

    No risk assessmenthas been erformedNo risk assessment

    has been erformed

    Mycotoxins can be 10 times more toxicthrough inhalation than by oral intake (Creasia etal., Fundam Appl Toxicol , 1987)

    for human inhalationexposure tomycotoxins

    for human inhalationexposure tomycotoxins

    16

    Studies concerning inhalation toxicity shouldaddress first aflatoxin B1 and B2, ochratoxin Aand roridin E

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    17/31

    To date, little is knownTo date, little is known

    Synergistic cytotoxic and inflammatoryproperties of amoebe and Stachybotryscalifornicus or Penicillium spinolosum spores has

    on synergistic effects of simultaneous exposure

    to mycotoxins

    on synergistic effects of simultaneous exposure

    to mycotoxins

    17

    een s own Y i-Piri a et a ., Environ Toxico , 2007

    Synergistic cytotoxicity and apoptosismechanisms of spore from co-coltures of S.chartarum and Aspergillus versicolor has been

    reported (Bloom et al., Appl Enviorn Microbiol , 2007)

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    18/31

    Fungal identification

    18

    Chaetomium spp.Cladosporium spp.Penicillium spp.

    Aspergillus spp.

    Trichoderma harzianum Stachybotrys chartarum

    Polizzi et al., J Environ Monit , 2009

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    19/31

    (M)VOCs117 (M)VOCs were detected in the indoor air of 11 buildings

    Common (M)VOCs in mouldy buildings:

    OH

    19

    Common (M)VOCs found also in the control house:

    o uene e y enzene xy enes s yrene , - - er - u y - -me y p eno

    O

    O

    O

    limonene

    -pinene 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene lilial

    nonanal

    decanal

    5-13

    linear alkanes (C9-C17)

    H

    H

    H

    Polizzi et al., J Environ Monit , 2009

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    20/31

    (M)VOCs117 (M)VOCs were detected in the indoor air of 11 buildings

    Common (M)VOCs in mouldy buildings:

    OH

    20

    Common (M)VOCs found also in the control house:

    o uene e y enzene xy enes s yrene , - - er - u y - -me y p eno

    O

    O

    O

    limonene

    -pinene 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene lilial

    nonanal

    decanal

    5-13

    linear alkanes (C9-C17)

    H

    H

    H

    Polizzi et al., J Environ Monit , 2009

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    21/31

    Mould-specific volatile compounds detected indoor

    O

    OH

    OMe

    OAc

    OMe

    5-methyl-3-heptanone

    valencene

    21

    Fungal species isolated from the contaminated building materials arecurrently under screening for VOC production

    MVOCs may be present in concentrations too low to be collected or tobe identified by standard analytical techniques (Wolkoff et al., Indoor Air ,2006)

    eugeno eugeno acetate

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    22/31

    (M)VOCs Health effectsMonoterpenes, benzyl acetate, bornylacetate, benzyl alcohol

    React with ozone and NO x to form secondary sensorypollutants which cause eye and respiratory tract

    irritation2-Hexylcinnamaldehyde, ionone derivatives,

    lilial, limonene, linaloolSuspected allergens causing skin irritation: they

    contain chemical groups considered responsible for

    binding with skin proteins

    1,4-Dichlorobenzene

    Short-term exposure gives irritation to the eyes andthe respiratory tract

    Long-term exposure regards liver, kidneys and blood

    Styrene

    , ,

    Classified as a possible human carcinogen by theInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)

    Toluene, xylenes, ethylbenzene,trimethylbenzene

    Narcotics, irritants, affect the central nervous system

    Alkanes Octane, decane and undecane are possible co-

    carcinogensSaturated short aldehydes Contact allergens due to the formation of imines withskin proteins

    Toluene diisocyanate Sensitizer; probable human carcinogen

    22

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    23/31

    Example of MVOC possibly related with SBS

    6-pentyl-2-pyrone

    High production of 6-pentyl-2-pyrone by a Trichoderma

    harzianum strain isolated froma mouldy environment

    6-pentyl-2-pyrone contains chemical groups heldresponsible for triggering skin irritation

    the mucosal irritation potency of this compound wastested by means of a slug mucosal irritation assay (SMI)

    23Polizzi et al., submitted , 2010

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    24/31

    Irritation and tissue damage caused by 6-pentyl-2-pyroneaccording to the SMI assay

    Total MP 1 Protein 1 LDH1 ALP1 Class

    (%) (g/ml.g) (U/l.g) n/5 Irritation Damage- PBS1 -3.8 2.8 9 2 - 0/5 No No

    +BAC1 1% 26.1 7.6 139 20 7.6 3.8 3/5 Severe Severe

    6-pentyl-2-pyrone 1% 14.9 5.0 34 11 0.1 0.1 0/5 Moderate Mild

    24

    6-pentyl-2-pyrone 5% 18.8 3.0 72 46 2.8 2.6 1/5 Severe Moderate

    6-pentyl-2-pyrone 10% 16.0 4.9 70 57 2.4 2.5 0/5 Severe Moderate1PBS= phosphate-buffered saline, BAC= benzalkonium chloride, MP=Mucos production, LDH=lactate dehydrogenase,

    ALP=alkaline phosphatase activity

    A heavy indoor contamination (e.g. 1 m2

    on plasterboard at 25C) by Trichodermasp. could produce quantities of 6-pentyl-2-pyrone that fall within theconcentration range classified in the SMI as irritating and damaging the mucosal

    membrane (Polizzi et al., submitted , 2010) .

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    25/31

    This is a first report on thesimultaneous analysis of fungi,

    mycotoxins and (M)VOCs in

    mouldy interiors

    Mainly sterigmatocystin,roquefortine C and

    chaetoglobosin A were found,in 31, 17 and 16 out of 99

    samples, respectively

    25

    en c um c rysogenum , sperg us vers co or group, aetom um spp.and Cladosporium spp. are the most common fungal species recovered

    In a sampling of a mouldybuilding, mould-specificvolatile compounds weredetected for the first time

    6-Pentyl-2-pyrone is a MVOCpotentially related to SBSsymptoms, as confirmed by

    the SMI assay

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    26/31

    Recommendations

    Research is needed on the inhalation toxicity of mycotoxinsand of co-occurring indoor mycotoxins.

    Studies concerning inhalation toxicity should address firstaflatoxin B1 and B2, ochratoxin A and roridin E.

    26

    There is a need of techniques with lower detection limits fordetection of (M)VOCs in indoor environments.

    The screening in vitro of fungal samples is useful foridentification of MVOCs potentially hazardous for humanhealth.

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    27/31

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    28/31

    28

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    29/31

    29

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    30/31

  • 8/9/2019 Presentation Air Pollution Conference - PDF

    31/31

    Slug mucosal irritation assay

    Cut-off values for the TotalMucus production are used toclassify the compounds intonon-irritants, mild, moderate &

    Daily during 5 successive days

    30 Contact Period with100 l of testsubstance

    Measure Mucusproduction

    Irritation

    Calculate Total Mucusproduction

    Test procedure (5Test procedure (5- -day)day)

    30 CP

    n=5

    EndpointsEndpoints CalculationsCalculations PredictionPredictionModelModel

    severe irritants .

    Transfer slug to newpetri dish. Add 1 mlPBS and remove thisafter 1 h.

    Transfer slug to newpetri dish. Add 1 mlPBS and remove thisafter 1 h.

    Tissue damageMeasure Protein,

    LDH & ALPrelease in samples

    Calculate MeanProtein, Mean LDHrelease and countnumber of slugsinducing ALP release

    Sample 1

    Sample 2

    A decision tree combining theresults of the Mean Protein,Mean LDH and number of slugsshowing ALP release is used toconvert the results into tissuedamage grades: no, mild,moderate and severe tissue damage

    31