presentation brasov
TRANSCRIPT
www.biomasseverband.at
The Biomass Supply Chain Operational Reference Processes (SCORPs)
www.biomasseverband.at
Condition of Forests in SerbiaOwnership structure of forests in Serbia
• State owned forests • Privately owned forests
www.biomasseverband.at
Selection of the Area for Analysis• Largest forest area• Big potential• 7,133 km2
• 8 municipalities• Bioenergy Point
www.biomasseverband.at
Forest Resources and Potential for Biomass Production in “Timok” Forest Area
Forest unit Areaha Yield from thining Yield from regeneration cutting Total annual Yield
ha m3 m3 m3
Zaječar 5,066.02 5,164 308 5,473
Knjaževac 18,241.88 11,621 6,775 18,396
Boljevac 24,529.93 21,829 19,212 41,041
Bor 11,417.52 5,068 16,641 21,709
Negotin 4,490.69 4,283 1,697 5,980
Kladovo 11,105.28 7,426 3,258 10,685
D.Milanovac 7,192.58 8,103 9,730 17,834
Grand 82,043.90 63,496 57,624 121,121
www.biomasseverband.at
Forest Resources and Potential for Biomass Production in “Timok” Forest Area
No Municipalites P Volume Increment Yield for thinnings
Regeneration cutting
Annual cutting
plan
ha m3/ha m3 m3/ha m3 ha m3 m3 m3
1 Boljevac 18.494 114 2108.1 1,75 32.401 1.274 16.538 2.188 18.726
2 Bor 24.925 127 3163.6 1,54 38.458 1.48 18.411 8.1 26.511
3 Knjaževac 27.094 106 3147.2 1,35 36.658 1.623 16.699 2.19 18.889
4 Zaječar 25.587 94 2336.8 1,13 29.117 1.14 10.038 2.11 12.148
5 Negotin 23.222 110 2566.3 1,14 26.536 1.219 10.475 1.47 11.945
6 Kladovo 7.917 110 872.25 1,23 9.73 613 5.756 - 5.756
7 D.Milanovac 5.194 141 731.27 1,80 9.429 430 5.214 660 5.874
Total: 132.43 115 14926 1,42 182.33 7.779 83.131 16.718 99.849
www.biomasseverband.at
Standing Trees in State Forests - Storage Pellet Plant
www.biomasseverband.at
Standing Trees in Private Forests - Storage Pellet Plant
www.biomasseverband.at
Pellet Plant to Customer (B2C)
www.biomasseverband.at
SWOT analysisInternal strengths Internal weaknesses
S1. Available, inexpensive and high quality raw materials.
S2. Good location in relation to the resource and communication.
S3. Representation of public and private forests.
S4. Lack of competition in relation to the production of pellets and biomass.
S5. Production volume (as all the other producers in Serbia together).
W1. Use of fuel wood instead wood residue, as a raw material for the production of pellets.
W2. No assurance for long-term supply of raw materials.
W3. Poor forest roads.
W4. Problems in the supply of raw materials in the winter.
External opportunities External threats
O1. Opportunities to use forest waste after harvest as a raw material that is now not in use.
O2. Activation potential from private forest.
O3. Ability to increase production capacities and additional quantities of raw materials.
O4. The leading company in the production of pellets and biomass
T1. The emergence of new competition especially in central heating systems.
T2. New investments in the production of pellets
T3. The limited potential of raw materials
T4. Lack of workforce for logging and harvesting
www.biomasseverband.at
Table A: status quo of ICT integrationOrally Analog Internet based
Navigation System GIS
face-to-face
by telephone
Letter
Fax
Internet hosting service
Online time management
Forest Resources Management + + + + + + + +
Contracting + + +
Harvesting + Logging + + +
Transporting + +
Chipping and other Processing +
Storing (Including Natural Drying) +
Technical Drying +
Pelletizing +
Transporting Pellets + + +
Accepting Shipment + +
www.biomasseverband.at
Table B: status quo of network communication structure
Forest owner
Forester
Logging
company
Wood haulier
Pellet producer
Pellet shipper
Custome
r
Book-keeper
Direct communication with …
Forest owner
Forester
Logging company
Wood haulier
Pellet producer
Pellet shipper
Customer
Book-keeper
www.biomasseverband.at
Table C: status quo of network communication structure
Wheel network Chain network Circle network All-channel network
Forest owner
Forester
Logging company
Wood haulier
Pellet producer
Pellet shipper
Customer
www.biomasseverband.at
THANKS FOR THE ATTENTION