presentation: how soil health can mitigate the effects of ......presentation: how soil health can...
TRANSCRIPT
HOW SOIL HEALTH CAN MITIGATE THE EFFECTS
OF EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS ON FARMS
Reducing the impact on production
CONTACT INFORMATION
Jerry L. HatfieldLaboratory Director National Laboratory for Agriculture and the
EnvironmentDirector, Midwest Climate Hub2110 University BlvdAmes, Iowa 50011515-294-5723515-294-8125 (fax)[email protected]
CLIMATE CHANGE
Precipitation changes
Temperature changes
Moving toward extremes
OBSERVED U.S. TRENDS IN
HEAVY PRECIPITATION
OBSERVED CHANGE IN VERY HEAVY
PRECIPITATION
EROSION: HOW MUCH IS TOLERABLE
THE WIND BLOWS TOO
SPRING PRECIPITATION (AMES)
Ames Spring Precipitation
Year
1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020
Pre
cip
ita
tio
n (
inch
es)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
Spring Precip (March-May)
Mean Spring Precip
The increase in spring
precipitation has
decreased the
number of workable
field days in April
through mid-May
across Iowa by 3.7 in
1995 to 2010
compared to 1979-
1994
y=-2.5991x+54.048R²=0.45023
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Suita
bleFieldDays
April-MayRainfall(inches)
SuitableFieldDays(Apr2-Jun3)versusApril-MayRainfall,IowaAverage(1959-2013)
PROJECTED
PRECIPITATION
CHANGE BY
SEASON
TEMPERATURE CHANGE BY DECADE
OBSERVED U.S. TEMPERATURE CHANGE
PROJECTED TEMPERATURE CHANGE
TEMPERATURE EFFECTS ON EVAPORATION
Air Temperature (C)
0 10 20 30 40 50
Satu
ratio
n V
ap
or
Pre
ssu
re (
kP
a)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
e* = 0.61121 exp(17.502Ta/Ta + 240.97)
𝐸𝑇 =𝜌𝑐𝑝(𝑇0 − 𝑇𝑠)
𝑟𝑎+
𝜌𝑐𝑝[𝑒𝑠 𝑇0 − 𝑒𝑎]
𝛾(1 + 𝑟𝑠
𝑟𝑎)𝑟𝑎
Calculations and plot by C. Anderson
Percentile
95th Percentile
Calculations and plot by C. Anderson
CROP PRODUCTION
US GRAIN PRODUCTION
US Wheat Production
Year
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
Yie
ld (
bu a
cre
-1)
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
US Soybean Production
Year
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
Yie
ld (
bu a
cre
-1)
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
US Corn Production
Year
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
Yie
ld (
bu a
cre
-1)
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
CURRENT AGRICULTURE IN THE MIDWEST
Midwest Corn Grain Production
Year
1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020
Yie
ld (
kg
ha
-1)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
Michigan
Iowa
Midwest Soybean Production
Year
1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020
Yie
ld (
kg
ha
-1)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Illinois
Indiana
Midwest Sweet Corn Production
Year
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
Yie
ld (
kg h
a-1
)
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Minnesota
Wisconsin
Midwest Potato Production
Year
1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020
Yie
ld (
kg
ha
-1)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Michigan
Wisconsin
CLIMATE FACTORS
Inputs
Temperature
Precipitation
Solar radiation
Carbon dioxide
Direct
Growth
Phenology
Yield
Indirect
Insects
Diseases
Weeds
Soil is the underlying factor as a resource
for nutrients and water
CROP PROGRESS-IOWA
CROP PROGRESS-INDIANA
Takle, E S, et al., 2013: Earth Interactions 18,
1-8
GOOD SOILS = GOOD YIELDS
Mean NCCPI
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Co
un
ty Y
ield
(g
m-2
)
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
Kentucky
Iowa
Nebraska
Kentucky(Double crop)Y = 131.187 + 187.458X. r
2 = 0.72***
Soybean yields
across Iowa,
Kentucky, and
Nebraska
NCCPI-AG
0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Mean
Co
un
ty Y
ield
(g
m-2
)
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Kentucky
IowaY = 436.096 + 478.149X, r2 = 0.58***
MAIZE COUNTY YIELDS
NCCPI
ACROSS THE
MIDWEST
OBSERVATIONS
Tillage increases the soil water evaporation rate
Differences among soils within a field which is related to organic matter content and soil water holding capacity
Water use patterns within a field cause “drought” stress to occur in every year
Organic Matter (%)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Ava
ilab
le W
ate
r C
on
ten
t (%
)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Data Points
Sand, AWC = 3.8 + 2.2 OM
Silt Loam, AWC = 9.2 + 3.7 OM
Silty clay loam, AWC = 6.3 + 2.8 OM
CO2 & H2O loss from Low vs High Disturbance Drills
0.38 0.35
3.01
0
1
2
3
4
5
None Low High
Disturbance Type
CO
2 l
os
s (
gC
O2
/m2
/h)
CO2 loss
Evaporation
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Ev
ap
ora
tio
n (
mm
/h)
0.70
0.17
0.35
Organic Matter Effects on Available Water Capacity
Silt loam
OM increase from 1% to 4.5%
AWC doubles!
5.7% 22.9% (% by Vol.)
Data from Soil Survey Investigation Reports
(surface horizons only)
- Sands: FL (n = 20)
- Silt loams: IA, WI, MN, KS (n = 18)
- Silty clay loams: IA, WI, MN, KS (n = 21)
Sands AWC = 3.8 + 2.2 (OM)
r2 = 0.79
Silt loams AWC = 9.2 + 3.7(OM)
r2 = 0.58
Silty clay loams AWC = 6.3 + 2.8 (OM)
r2 = 0.76
Hudson, B. D. 1994. Soil organic matter and available
water capacity. J. Soil Water Conserv. 49(2):189-194.
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
ET = Soil water evaporation + Plant transpiration
Energy
Input
(Net
radiation)
Water Vapor
Gradient
f (temp,
vapor
pressure)
Windspeed
Gradient
Soil Water
Availability
Components of ET
Potential ET (how much could evaporate) vs Actual ET (how much does)
Rate-limitation
WATER USE EFFICIENCY-REALITY
Water Use (mm)
200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550
Yie
ld (
kg
ha
-1)
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
22000
150 kg ha-1
Yield = 3022 + 27.9 Water Use r2= 0.63
100 kg ha-1
200 kg ha-1
50 kg ha-1
Corn Water Use Efficiency
Water Use (mm)
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Yie
ld (
kg
ha
-1)
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
22000
24000
26000
28000
Water deficit
need 5 inches more
water to grow 300 bu
corn
IOWA COUNTY YIELDS
Floyd County
Year
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
Yie
ld (
kg
ha
-1)
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
Observed Corn Yields
Maximum Corn Yields
Story County
Year
1940 1960 1980 2000 2020
Yie
ld (
kg
ha
-1)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
Observed Corn Yield
Maximum Corn Yield
Washington County
Year
1940 1960 1980 2000 2020
Yie
ld (
kg h
a-1
)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
Observed Corn Yield
Maximum Corn Yield
Cass County
Year
1940 1960 1980 2000 2020
Yie
ld (
kg h
a-1
)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
Floyd County
VARIATION IN YIELDS
Iowa County Maize Yields
Fraction of Potential Maize Yield
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Fre
quency
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Cass County
Floyd County
Story County
Washington County
The majority of the yield losses due to the weather are short-term stresses
20% of the yield
loss occurs 80%
of the time due to
water availability
FEEDBACKS BETWEEN TEMPERATURE
EXTREMES AND CROP WATER USE
Depends upon the soil water status and the
root exploration of the crop
Extreme temperatures increase atmospheric
demand and lead to short-term water stress
even in well-watered or saturated soils
Magnitude of the effect depends upon the prior
soil water conditions and rooting depth
TEMPERATURE EFFECTS ON CORN PHENOLOGY
Corn Hybrid RX730
Days after Planting
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Tota
l C
olla
rs
0
5
10
15
20
25
Normal Temperatures
Warm Temperatures
Corn Hybrid DK 61-72
Days after Planting
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Tota
l C
olla
rs
0
5
10
15
20
25
Normal Temperatures
Warm Temperatures
Corn Hybrid XL45A
Days after Planting
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Tota
l C
olla
rs
0
5
10
15
20
25
Normal Temperatures
Warm Temperatures
Rhizotron study with warm chamber 4C warmer than normal chamber
with simulation of Ames IA temperature patterns.
2139 13700 0 7323 2168 12962 kg ha-1
TEMPERATURE EFFECTS ON CORN PHENOLOGY
Corn Hybrid RX730
Days after Planting
20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Tota
l C
olla
rs
0
5
10
15
20
25
Normal Temperatures
Warm Temperatures
Corn Hybrid DKC61-72
Days after Planting
20 40 60 80 100 120
Tota
l C
olla
rs
0
5
10
15
20
25
Normal Temperatures
Warm Temperatures
Corn Hybrid XL45A
Days after Planting
20 40 60 80 100 120
Tota
l C
olla
rs
0
5
10
15
20
25
Normal Temperatures
Warm Temperatures
Rhizotron study with warm chamber 4C warmer than normal
chamber with simulation of Ames IA temperature patterns.
599 4711 342 3053 0 4197 kg ha-1
RHIZOTRON RESULTSY
ield
(g
/p
lan
t)
Soil Water Levels Soil Water Levels
0.5 1.0 1.5 0.5 1.0 1.5
Normal Temp High Temp (reprod)
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 6
0 7
0 8
0 9
0 1
00
Combinations of water
and temperature
stresses cause disruption
in pollination and grain-
fill
LEAF CHLOROPHYLL 2011
Corn 2011
Day of Year
140 160 180 200 220 240 260
Leaf C
hlo
rophyll
Readin
gs
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
SuperU 1 PB 0
SuperU 1/3 PB 2/3
SuperU 2/3 PB 1/3
CHLOROPHYLL SUMMATION INDEX
Corn 2009-2010
Summation of Chlorophyll Index Readings
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
Yie
ld (
kg h
a-1
)
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
Data points
Yield = 5019 + 2.78 CIs R2 = 0.84
“Passive protective blanket” “Active protective blanket”
SOIL AGGRADATION CLIMB
Biological Activity
Improved Nutrient Cycling
Organic Matter Turnover
Improved Soil Structure
Improved Water
Efficiency
Yield
Profit
SOIL HEALTH FACTORS
Water holding capacity
Aggregate stability (infiltration)
Rooting depth
Nutrient cycling and nutrient availability
Gas exchange between the soil and the atmosphere (oxygen and carbon dioxide)
Residue cover (living or dead)
Reduced tillage