1

Preparedness Now

! Available on YouTube ! From SCEC - Southern California

Earthquake Center

1

! Available on YouTube ! From SCEC - Southern California

Earthquake Center

Available on YouTube

2

January 31, 2017

Workshop

Dr. Lucy Jones Founder, Dr. Lucy Jones Center for Science and Society

January 31, 2017

Workshop

What’s at Stake?

3

Living on the plate boundary

Moving to San Francisco at 1 3/4 inches per year

4

Shaking Intensity ≠ MagnitudeEaster 2010 M7.2 El Mayor Cucaipa

January 1994 M6.7 Northridge

5

The other faults of southern California

5

6

ShakeOut Simulation of M7.8 on San Andreas

7

Our Urban Society Is At RiskUrban Disaster Resilience is having a society that functions after the disaster

8

A System of Systems

9

NECESSARY SYSTEMS

TRANSPORTATION

SUPPLY CHAIN

BUSINESS/JOBS

SCHOOLS

BANKING/FINANCE

HEALTH AND SAFETY

EMOTIONAL WELL-BEING

REPAIR AND RECOVERY

WATER

ELECTRICITY

CELL TOWERS PHONE SYSTEMS

INTERNET

GAS

BUILDINGS

10

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE

WATER

ELECTRICITY

GAS

INTERNET

PHONE SYSTEMSCELL TOWERS

BUILDINGS

11

NECESSARY SYSTEMS

TRANSPORTATION

SUPPLY CHAIN

BUSINESS/JOBS

SCHOOLS

BANKING/FINANCE

HEALTH AND SAFETY

EMOTIONAL WELL-BEING

REPAIR AND RECOVERY

WATER

ELECTRICITY

CELL TOWERS PHONE SYSTEMS

INTERNET

GAS

BUILDINGSBUILDINGS INTERNET

EMOTIONAL WELL-BEING

WATER

TRANSPORTATION

12

Water and the San Andreas Fault

LOS ANGELES

PALMDALE

IRVINE

LANCASTER

RIVERSIDE

HESPERIA

PALM SPRINGS

VICTORVILLE

INDIO

ANAHEIM

ONTARIO

APPLE VALLEY

MENIFEE

ADELANTO

FONTANA

CHINO

CORONA

PERRIS

BARSTOW

LONG BEACH

HEMET

SANTA CLARITA

CHINO HILLS

SIMI VALLEY

REDLANDS

LA QUINTA

TEMECULA

THOUSAND OAKS

ORANGE

MURRIETA

YUCAIPA

OXNARD

RIALTO

MORENO VALLEY

TWENTYNINE PALMS

GLENDALE

JURUPA VALLEY

LAKE ELSINORE

YUCCA VALLEY

BEAUMONT

POMONA

BANNING

SANTA ANA

COACHELLA

BREA

CARSON

WILDOMAR

PASADENA

SAN JACINTO

FULLERTON

UPLAND

NORCO

HIGHLAND

BURBANK

CAMARILLO

WHITTIER

CALIMESA

DOWNEY

CALABASAS

California Aqueduct East Branch

California Aqueduct East BranchExtension

Colorado River Aqueduct

Los

Ange

lesAq

uedu

ct

San

Diego

Canal

C oachalla Canal

Seco

ndSa

nDi

ego

Can

al

San Bernardino

Riverside

Los Angeles

Ventura

Orange

Imperial

Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA

MAJOR WATER CONVEYANCE & EARTHQUAKE FAULTSIN THE SCAG REGION

San Bernardino

Riverside

Imperial

Orange

Colora doRi

ve

r Aqueduct

Coachalla Canal

All American Canal

SanD

iegoCanal

Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA

Source: California Department of Water Resources, State of California Geoportal | Date: 10/10/2016 | P:\Feiyang Zhang\California Aqueduct\Map

° 0 10 205Miles

Major Water Conveyance

Nature Water Features

Historic

Holocene & Latest Pleistocene

Late Quaternary

WATER SYSTEMS EARTHQUAKE FAULTS

13

DAMAGED WATERSUPPLY

Damaged Water Supply Network

1313

DAMAGED WAWAW TERATERASUPPLYLYL

! All aqueducts cross the San Andreas to get to southern California and will be broken. ! 18 months to repair

!Widespread damage to pipes in the ground ! 6 months to restore all service

1414MASS

EVACUATIONBUSINESS

DISRUPTION

FAULTOFFSET

EARTHQUAKESHAKING

CHEMICALACCIDENTS

MANPOWERINTERNET FORWATER COMPANIES

TRANSPORTATION PURIFICATIONSYSTEMS

DAMAGED WATERSUPPLY

LIFE LOSS

LOSS OF SHELTER BUSINESSCLOSURE

DAMAGE TO BUILDINGSAND PROPERTY

IMPAIRED MEDICALRESPONSE

CAUSES

NEEDED FOR REPAIRS

SHORT-TERM CONSEQUENCES

LONG REPAIR TIME CONSEQUENCES

Damaged Water Supply Network

15

FIRE

15

Fire Following the Earthquake

!1,600 ignitions requiring a fire engine ! 1,200 exceed capability of 1st engine ! 200 million square feet burnt ! 133,000 single family dwellings • ~1.5% of total building stock

! Property loss: $65 billion15

FIRE

15

16DAMAGE TO COMMUNICATIONSNETWORKS

PHONE LINESOVERLOADED

DAMAGED CELLTOWERS

SEVERED FIBEROPTICS

Communication disruption

! Electricity could be out for weeks ! Cell tower backup power lasts 4 hours ! Two-thirds of Internet bandwidth in

fiber cables across the San Andreas

DAMAGE TO COMMUNICATIONSNETWORKS

PHONE LINESOVERLOADED

DAMAGED CELLTOWERS

SEVERED FIBEROPTICS

17

BUSINESSDISRUPTION

EMOTIONALHARDSHIP

FAULTOFFSET

EARTHQUAKESHAKING

FIRE

MANPOWER

TRANSPORTATION

DAMAGE TO COMMUNICATIONSNETWORKS

PHONE LINESOVERLOADED

DAMAGED CELLTOWERS

SEVERED FIBEROPTICS

IMPAIRED EMERGENCYRESPONSE

IMPAIRED MEDICALRESPONSE

BUSINESSCLOSURE

IMPAIRED FIRERESPONSECAUSES

NEEDED FOR REPAIRS

SHORT-TERM CONSEQUENCES

Communication disruption

LONG REPAIR TIME CONSEQUENCES

18

Damaged Transportation

Maule, Chile, M8.8February 27, 2010

1919

DAMAGE TO TRANSPORTATIONSYSTEMS

NO DEBRISREMOVAL

LOSS OF FOODSUPPLY

TRAFFIC JAMSAND ACCIDENTS

IMPAIRED EMERGENCYRESPONSE

IMPAIRED MEDICALRESPONSE

POWERDEBRISREMOVAL

MANPOWERINTERNET FORCALTRANS

BUSINESSINTERRUPTION

IMPEDEDRECONSTRUCTION

SUPPLY CHAINDISRUPTION

FIRE

WATER PIPEBREAKAGE

EARTHQUAKESHAKING

DAMAGED POWERSYSTEM

LANDSLIDES

DEBRIS INROADS

FAULTOFFSET

Damaged Transportation

DAMAGE TO TRANSPORTATIONSYSTEMS

TRAFFIC JAMSAND ACCIDENTS

IMPAIRED EMERGENCYRESPONSE

NO DEBRISREMOVAL

LOSS OF FOODSUPPLY

IMPAIRED MEDICALRESPONSE

FIRE

WATER PIPEBREAKAGE

EARTHQUAKESHAKING

DAMAGED POWERSYSTEM

LANDSLIDES

DEBRIS INROADS

FAULTOFFSET

CAUSES

SHORT-TERM CONSEQUENCES

NEEDED FOR REPAIRS

POWERDEBRISREMOVAL

MANPOWERINTERNET FORCALTRANS

LONG REPAIR TIME CONSEQUENCES

20

ShakeOut Damage to Buildings! Concrete buildings: ! Commercial buildings from 1950s and 1960s ! In highest shaking areas, 10% collapse! Biggest life loss in scenario

! Unreinforced masonry ! Collapse of 300+ buildings ! Complete financial loss for 90% within 30 km of

fault ! Pre-1994 steel frame high rises could collapse ! 300,000 buildings with loss >10% of value

DAMAGED BUILDINGS

20

DAMAGED BUILDINGS

2121

DAMAGE TO ADJACENTBUILDING PROPERTY $

BUSINESSDISRUPTION

EMOTIONALHARDSHIP

LONG REPAIR TIME CONSEQUENCES

EARTHQUAKESHAKING

FIRE

WATER PIPEBREAKAGE

POWERDEBRISREMOVAL

MANPOWERTRANSPORTATION

DAMAGED BUILDINGS

LIFE LOSS

LOSS OF SHELTER BUSINESSCLOSURE

NEEDED FOR REPAIRS

CAUSES

SHORT-TERM CONSEQUENCES

Building Damage and Destruction

LONG REPAIR TIME CONSEQUENCES

22

Retrofitting URMs has saved lives

! In the Northridge earthquake: •No one died in a URM •Only 19% of inspected URMs needed repairs

compared to 33% of buildings overall

!Statewide•Jurisdictions have retrofitted or demolished

88% of URMs with mandatory programs •Only 22% with voluntary programs

23

Buildings that Can Kill

! Unreinforced masonry (pre-1935) ! Soft-first-story (pre-1980) ! Non-ductile concrete (pre-1980) ! Steel moment frames (pre-1997)

23

24

Current building code

24

! In worst earthquake, 90% probability of not collapsing ! 10% probability of collapse = 10% of

new buildings collapsing

25

Impaired buildings are economic loss

!" !"

26

In California, many more buildings impaired

▪ Average of Loma Prieta & Northridge ▪ For each collapse

+ 13 red tags ▪ For each red tag,

+ 3.8 yellow tags ▪ = 63 impaired per collapse

Check: Napa 2014 had 57 impaired per collapse

2727

49% USABLE BUILDINGSAFTER EARTHQUAKE

1% COLLAPSED10% UNSAFE

40% LIMITED USE

CAN WE SURVIVE “THE “BIG ONE”?

28

Christchurch 2010

29

Christchurch, February 22, 2011 M6.3

29

30

Christchurch 2015

30

31

Most people don’t know what the code provides

!"#$%&'%$"(%)*&+,&-.%/0,(1'%0)2(/34(5

Survey of 814 people by Dr. Keith Porter, U. Colorado:

32

Most people want more than the code provides

!"#$%'"0*+,%&$%(-'*6(5

33

SOCIAL REPERCUSSIONS

77

34

Social Repercussions

1906 earthquake

Popu

latio

n

Year

SF

LA

1890 1900 1910 1920

35

Biggest Issues from San Andreas

▪ Life loss in old buildings ▪ Fire following earthquake ▪ Loss of housing ▪ Business disruption •Unusable commercial properties •Transportation disruption •Utility outages

▪ Region-wide disruption

36

37

What happened in New Orleans

37

38

What happened physically

! animation of hurricane path

38

! animation of hurricane path

39

Knowing risk ! planning ahead

40

Cascading failures

40

41

What happened politically

41

42

Economic consequences

NEW ORLEANS VS NASHVILLE ECONOMIC GROWTH

2004 2006 2008 2010 2012YEAR

84.0

78.0

72.0

66.0

60.0REAL

GROS

S DOM

ESTIC

PROD

UCT

(in Bi

llions

of Do

llars

) NASHVILLE

NEW ORLEANS

-$80 BILLION

-$105 BILLION

43

SOCIAL REPERCUSSIONSNEW ORLEANS

POPULATION GROWTH

2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

500,000

420,000

340,000

260,000

180,000

POPU

LATIO

N

YEAR

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

Contact

drlucyjonescenter.org