presentation1
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Presentation1](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070301/5469eddeaf7959e8488b4689/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
TED Talk Presentation
By: Zachary Mills
![Page 2: Presentation1](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070301/5469eddeaf7959e8488b4689/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Andrew Stanton’s “The Clues to a Great Story”
![Page 3: Presentation1](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070301/5469eddeaf7959e8488b4689/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Andrew began with a joke…
![Page 4: Presentation1](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070301/5469eddeaf7959e8488b4689/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Andrew’s thesis is using what you know to express and carry you through a good story; using story-telling techniques that aren’t even necessarily the
norm, and that all build up to the “punch-line”.
![Page 5: Presentation1](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070301/5469eddeaf7959e8488b4689/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Andrew engages the audience by giving examples of his work…
![Page 6: Presentation1](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070301/5469eddeaf7959e8488b4689/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
…and by explaining the paradigms of stories don’t have to follow a specific hierarchy or structure.
![Page 7: Presentation1](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070301/5469eddeaf7959e8488b4689/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
He also expresses that telling a story about what you know – through life experiences – is the best way to tell a story and to
capture an audience.
![Page 8: Presentation1](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070301/5469eddeaf7959e8488b4689/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
I’d rate Andrew Stanton a “5” in dynamism; He was capable of changing up his intensity, his approach, and his point in different ways – like a wave.
![Page 9: Presentation1](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070301/5469eddeaf7959e8488b4689/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
I’ve learned, in watching these speakers, that they seem much more effective by not using “uh” or “um”; they didn’t stumble along, and they never brought
light to a mistake.
![Page 10: Presentation1](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070301/5469eddeaf7959e8488b4689/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
In comparing Andrew Stanton and Sir Ken Robinson, Andrew’s speech was very on point, and didn’t stray too greatly from the main topic.
![Page 11: Presentation1](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070301/5469eddeaf7959e8488b4689/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Whereas Sir Ken seemed to meander into smaller stories and jokes, which kept the audience entertained, but carried on the main point for longer than
it could’ve been, I think.
![Page 12: Presentation1](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070301/5469eddeaf7959e8488b4689/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
His speech on creativity expressed ADHD as a problem vs. a different method of learning. The latter being his main priority
and view of his speech.
![Page 13: Presentation1](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070301/5469eddeaf7959e8488b4689/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
However, both of Sir Ken’s speeches were based on education.
![Page 14: Presentation1](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070301/5469eddeaf7959e8488b4689/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Creativity is the premise for both speakers. Creativity in schools and creativity in story-telling…
![Page 15: Presentation1](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070301/5469eddeaf7959e8488b4689/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
…and both speakers came to the conclusion that perhaps the predetermined mindset of each topic is “wrong” in a sense.
![Page 16: Presentation1](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070301/5469eddeaf7959e8488b4689/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
A tip I can attempt to give to my classmates in delivery is to refrain from using “um” and “uh” during a speech, and to collect your thoughts. Good luck all.
Thank you!