presented by leigh m. manasevit, esq. [email protected] brustein & manasevit, pllc fall...
TRANSCRIPT
Presented byLeigh M. Manasevit, [email protected]
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLCFall Forum 2013
Why “Supercircular”???1. Greater simplicity
2. Greater consistency
3. Obama Executive Order on Regulatory Review – 2011 Increase efficiency Strengthen oversight
2
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Greater “simplicity” means elimination of several compliance elements in the Compliance Supplement, including:
1. Equipment Management2. MOE/Ear-Marking3. Procurement4. Program Income
3
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
What is covered?
1. Administrative Requirements (A-102, A-110)
2. Cost Principles (A-87, A-21, A-122)
3. Audit Requirements (A-133)
4
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Who is covered?All non-federal entities expending federal awards
5
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
When is it effective?
NPRM – 2/1/13Close of comment period – 05/02/13Analysis of public commentFinal regulation – not likely before 1/1/14
EDGAR revisions – within one year of final regulation?
No splitting FY
6
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
When is it effective?Part 2BUT SEE highly critical comments of Council of Inspectors General for Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE)
7
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
A Battle Over the Future Direction of Federal Grants Management
OMB vs. OIG
8
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
9
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Who?OMB did not issue 2/1/13 NPRM (Super Circular) in vacuum
Drafters from Council of Finance Assistance Reform (COFAR)
HHS, ED, DOL, NSF, AG, HS, DOT, HUD, Energy
10
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Who?But did “COFAR” include “CIGIE”? Council of Inspectors General for Integrity and Efficiency
20 Federal Agencies 94% of $1.2 trillion in direct federal awards covered by A-133
11
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG Goal:
1.Promote accountability
2.Eliminate fraud, waste, abuse and improper payments
Why?
12
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Why?Because goals are not aligned, OIG
disagrees, strongly disagrees, and extremely disagrees with many of the proposed OMB changes
13
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
When?Prediction: The OIG comments will either delay the final regulation or result in issuance of new NPRM
14
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
When?EDGAR must be revised within 12 months of final regulation
Since changes must be prospective, effective date may be 7/1/16, not 7/1/15
15
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
16
1st Battleground
Time and Effort Certifications
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OMB ProposalEliminate reference to PARsNow “Certified Reports”Reports may be electronicSemi-Annual for single cost objective – same
17
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Time and Effort ManagementAfter the fact, unless mutually satisfactory alternative approved by awarding agency
Certification periods cannot exceed 12 months
Activities may be expressed as percentages
18
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Time and Effort Management
At postsecondary level, “reliance may be placed on estimates in which a degree of tolerance is appropriate
19
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Time and Effort Management
Certified Reports on 2 or more cost objectives certified by employee or individual responsible for verification
20
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Time and Effort ManagementNo additional support other than certification is necessary
21
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Time and Effort ManagementSubstitute systems may be used if approved by cognizant agency
Federal agencies are encouraged to approve alternative proposals based on outcomes
22
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Time and Effort ManagementAwarding agencies may approve “blended funding” where multiple programs are involved and “performance-oriented metrics” are used
23
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG Rebuttal – Certifications All certifications must reference consequences of false certificationBy signing this report… I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent information, or the omission of any material fact may subject me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties.
24
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG Rebuttal - Time and Effort
Any relaxation of time and effort rules would have “significant detrimental impact on government’s ability to protect from fraud, waste, abuse, improper payments.”
25
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG Rebuttal - Time and Effort
NPRM proposed standards “would seriously undermine our community’s ability to identify and question unallowable and even fraudulent charges.”
26
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG Rebuttal - Time and Effort
Do not issue final rule until results from four national pilot projects are considered
27
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG Rebuttal - Time and EffortOMB should provide uniform language:1. Time charged reflects time actually
worked on project2. Alerts signer that he/she is subject
to federal laws on submission of false information
28
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG Rebuttal - Time and EffortRetain A-87 language:“Where employees work on multiple activities or cost objectives, a distribution of their salaries or wages will be supported by personnel activity reports or equivalent documentation.”
29
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG Rebuttal - Time and EffortPayroll distributions are based on budget estimates that do not focus on actual activity
30
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG Rebuttal - Time and Effort
12 month certifications do not provide adequate oversight it is too extensive a period for persons to identify actual activity performed (unless supported by additional source documentation)
31
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG Rebuttal - Time and Effort
Drop phrase “mutually satisfactory alternative” in lieu of “after the fact certifications.” According to OIG, there are “no mutually satisfactory alternatives.”
32
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG Rebuttal - Time and Effort
How would quarterly adjustments be validated using 12 month certifications?
33
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG Rebuttal - Time and Effort
Certifications from supervisory personnel must include review of labor distribution reports to ensure effort being charged is reasonable.
34
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG Rebuttal - Time and EffortCharges for salaries and wages of nonprofessional employees (old A-21) must be supported by records that include time on tasks
Substitute systems must contain sufficient detail to be useful for audit purposes
35
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
36
2nd Battleground
Employee Morale, Health and Welfare Costs
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Employee MoraleA-87 / A-21 currently allows for expenses incurred in accordance with the entity’s “established practice or custom for the improvement of working conditions, employer – employee relations, employee morale”
37
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OMB - ProposalNo Change
38
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG Rebuttal - Employee MoraleDo not allow expenses for recipient’s established practices could result in purchase of:
Groceries Pizza partiesToiletriesT-shirtsGiftsJewelryFlowersBalloons
Funds must be closely related to grant purposes
39Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
403rd Battleground
Food / Meetings / Conferences
3 way battle
OMB / OIG / ED
? ? ? ?
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Current Law: A-87 / A-21Costs of meals and transportation if primary purpose of meeting / conference is dissemination of technical information
41
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OMB Proposal
Cost of MeetingsCosts from meetings and conferences “beyond the recipient entity” are allowable
42
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OMB ProposalTravel CostsGrantee must retain documentation
a) Participation of individual is necessary to the federal award
b) Costs are reasonable and consistent with entity’s established travel policy
43
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Cost Principle Changes
TravelIf no institutional travel policy, GSA rates apply
-48 CFR 31.205
44
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG Rebuttal – Meetings and ConferencesOIGs have found conferences held by recipients where per-person cost of daily catering was between 189% and 400% of applicable location’s federal per diem for meals and incidental expenses
45
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG Rebuttal – Meetings and ConferencesOMB should limit meal costs to federal per diem rates and document a cost comparison of at least three sites to determine most cost-advantageous location
46
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
New ED Guidance on Using Federal Funds for Conferences and Meetings
Very high burden of proof to show that paying for food is necessary
Grantee should structure agenda so there is time for participants to purchase own food; use location with easy access to food
47Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
48
Grantees should not use grant funds to pay for food and beverages for receptions and networking sessions
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
49
When grantees contract with a hotel, food and beverage costs should be “backed out”
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
50
4th BattlegroundSingle Audit Thresholds
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Single Audit ThresholdsSingle Audit Thresholds
Current Law $500,000OMB Increase to $750,000
51
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG Rebuttal - Single Audit Thresholds Increasing threshold from $500,000 to $750,000 loses audit coverage of 6,400 auditees
But these smaller auditees have more non-compliance and material weaknesses on internal control
52
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG Rebuttal - Audit QualityOIG recommends language that auditor engagement not exceed five consecutive years.
53
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG Rebuttal - Submission of Audit ReportsDo not eliminate requirement for subrecipients to submit audit reports to their “pass-through” entities. This would adversely impact the monitoring function.
54
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG Rebuttal - Questioned CostsRevise the proposed guidance to require the reporting of all known questioned costs, not just those over $25,000.
55
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
5th Battleground
Should computers be classified as “supplies?”
56
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Current Law:
34 CFR 80.3Tangible personal property having a useful life of more than one year and an acquisition cost of $5,000 or more per unit. A grantee may use its own definition of equipment provided such definition would at least include all equipment defined above.
57
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
58
OMB Costs of computing devices classified as
“supplies.”
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Reclassifying Computing Devices as “Supplies” OIG Opposes
Accounting definition of “supplies” are general purpose consumable items with shorter life span than machines
Computers would not be subject to basic inventory controls, although “misuse” is high
Federal agencies would not know if computers are being used for intended purposes or kept on entity’s premises
59Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
6th Battleground
Cash Management
60
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OMB – Cash ManagementRecipient shall maintain advances of federal funds in interest bearing accounts unless…a) Recipient receives less than
$120,000 in federal $ per yearb) Interest will not exceed $500c) Bank requires minimum balance
61
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OMB – Cash ManagementUnrecovered indirect costs may be included as match only with approval of federal agency
62
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OMB – Cash ManagementGeneral rule on program incomes: “program income shall be deducted from total allowable costs to determine the net allowable costs,” unless federal agency indicates otherwise
63
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIGRequest OMB require recipients and subrecipients to provide interim financial statements
Such statements must contain basic line item information on how federal funds are spent
Without such interim statements pass-throughs and federal agencies cannot effectively monitor grantees
64
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG - Cash Management
Recommend specific time frames for which recipient can draw cash
Terms such as “minimize” or “anticipated needs” are too general and not auditable
65
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG - Cash Management
Clarify the type of working capital analysis that is required of federal agencies prior to providing advance payments
66
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG - Cash Management
All recipients should account for program income using the “deduction method” unless federal agency indicates otherwise
67
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG - Cash ManagementAlign Circular with Compliance Supplement on “Reimbursement”
Compliance Supplement requires that costs must be paid by the recipient before reimbursement is requested.
Under accrual accounting, a cost could be expensed on an award that has not been paid.
68
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG - Cash ManagementRecommend that federal funds never be placed in non-insured depository accounts
69
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG - Cash ManagementDo not allow program income to meet matching requirements because it could skew equitable cost sharing
70
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG - Cash ManagementClear language is needed to assure “profit” is prohibited from all grants and cooperative agreements
71
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
7th BattlegroundAdministrative Costs
72
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OMB Proposes
Salaries of administrative and clerical staff should be treated as indirect, unless
a) Services are integral to project, and
b) Individuals can be specifically identified, and
c) Costs are explicitly set out in budget, and
d) Costs are not recovered as indirect
73
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG RebuttalAdministrative Costs vs. Indirect
Circular must explicitly state that it is recipient’s responsibility to prove through verifiable means that direct charging of administrative and clerical salaries are reasonable, necessary, allocable.
74
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG RebuttalAdministrative Costs vs. Indirect
OIG “would have a very difficult time auditing to determine whether administrative clerical salaries were charged both indirectly and directly, as indirect costs are not always identified by position.”
75
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG RebuttalAdministrative Costs vs. Indirect
OIG demands more detailed reporting to justify charging administrative and clerical salaries as a direct cost demonstrating that such costs “are so integral to a project or activity to warrant direct charging.”
76
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG RebuttalJanitorial Costs
Circular must clarify how janitorial costs charged directly or indirectly. OIG has same concerns on clerical salaries.
77
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
8th BattlegroundAudit Resolution
Attorney Fees
78
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OMB ProposesCosts for services of counsel (in-house or Bruman) for administrative proceedings (OALJ) may not be charged if the ALJ imposes a “monetary penalty.” Legal expenses are allowable if the proceeding is resolved by consent or compromise.
79
Section _.621 C-14(2)
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OIG Rebuttal - Attorney FeesAll costs related to administrative proceedings should be completely unallowable, regardless of disposition
80
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OMB - Audit Follow-UpFederal awarding agencies shall use “cooperative audit resolution mechanisms” to improve federal program outcomes through better audit resolution, follow-up and corrective action
81
Section _.713(c)(5)
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Cooperative Audit ResolutionImprove communication, foster collaboration, promote trust, and develop understanding between auditor and auditee
82
Appendix I - Definitions
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Cooperative Audit Resolution
This approach is based upon “Federal agencies offering appropriate amnesty for past noncompliance when audits show prompt corrective action”
83
Appendix I - Definitions
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Agency Determination LettersThe federal agency or pass-through entity may request additional information from auditee as a way of mitigating disallowed costs
84
Section _.714(a)
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
EnforcementAgencies that do not provide an opportunity to challenge suspension or terminations until after the action is taken (NSF) should be permitted to do so
85
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Internal Controls
Do not delete A-21 control“ensure that no one person has complete control overall aspects of a financial transactions.”
86
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Can a revised EDGAR be inconsistent with Supercircular?
Yes, but federal agencies applying more restrictive requirements need OMB approval
87
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
If program statute differs from Supercircular, statute governs
88
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
So what is new?89
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Federal agencies must evaluate risks to the program posed by each applicant
a) Financial stability
b) Management system
c) History of performance
d) Generally available information
e) Single audits
f) Capacity to implement programs
90Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Agencies may impose conditions on grantee based on risk assessed
91
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Performance Expectations
Award includes: timing and scope of expected performance – as related to intended outcomes
92
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Subawarding Scope of Work
Eligible recipients may perform or subaward the performance of all or a portion of the work
93
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Pass Through Agency should consider imposing risk conditions on subrecipients in noncompliance
94
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Pass Through Agency may impose “supplemental requirements”
95
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Pass Through monitoring shall include:
a) Analyzing financial and programmatic reports
b) Ensuring subrecipients take timely and appropriate corrective action
c) Issuing management decision on A-133 finding at subgrantee level
d) Other – as necessary
96
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Monitoring Tools of Pass Through
a) On-site reviews
b) Provide training and technical assistance
c) Arrange for “Agreed Upon Procedures”
97
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Risk Factors for Pass Through Monitoring
a) Previous audits
b) New subrecipients
c) New personnel or substantially changed system
d) Extent of federal monitoring
98
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Inventory Management
2 year inventory requirement remains
EquipmentDefinition same
a)Acquisition cost of $5,000
b)Useful life greater than one year
99
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Inventory Management
Use/Management/DispositionSame as EDGAR 80.32
100
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Procurement Management
States must follow same procurement rules it uses for procurements from nonfederal funds
All others must follow Section 504
101
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Procurement Management
Section 504 Procurement Standards derived from A-110, EDGAR Part 74 and A-102, EDGAR Part 80
102
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Record Retention ManagementSame as EDGAR: 3 years from date of submission of final expenditure report BUT – 5 year S/L
103
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Cost Principles – Basic Considerations
Similar to A-87 but restructured
104
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Cost Allocation
If a cost benefits two or more projects in a proportion easily determined, cost allocated on proportional benefit
105
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Cost Allocation
If proportion cannot be easily determined, allocate on any reasonable documented basis
106
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Indirect Costs
A federally approved negotiated rate shall be accepted by all federal agenciesException: If required by law/regulation (restricted rate)
107
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Indirect Costs
Pass through entities must abide by the federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the federal agency and subrecipient
108
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Indirect Costs
But if no such rate exists, the pass through must negotiate the rate, or a de minimis indirect cost rate equal to 10% of total modified direct costs (But what about restricted rates? Most LEAs have restricted rates in single digits.)
109
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Disclaimer
This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute
legal advice. Attendance at the presentation or later review of these printed materials does not
create an attorney-client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC. You should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first consulting legal
counsel familiar with your particular circumstances.
110
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC