preventing excessive weight gain

1
Commentary See Article by Brown et al. on pages 1431–1441 Preventing Excessive Weight Gain James O. Hill In this issue of Obesity Research, Brown et al. (1) provide more evidence that the obesity epidemic has arisen from gradual weight gain in the population produced by very small degrees of energy imbalance. The authors followed over 8000 middle-aged women in Australia for more than 5 years, from 1996 to 2001. They found that the women gained an average of 0.5 kg/yr. They estimated that this gradual weight gain represents an accumulation of 10 kcal/d. This research supports our previous research show- ing that the average American adult gains 0.45– 0.91 kg (1–2 lbs) each year, which would be an average accumula- tion of 15 kcal/d (2). There is an energy cost to storing excess energy, which we estimated to be 50%, so that the actual degree of energy imbalance causing the weight gain in middle-aged Australian women would be 20 kcal/d and 30 kcal/d in the U.S. adult population. The higher imbal- ance in the U.S. could be because of a more “obesigenic” environment or because the U.S. sample includes a wider range of adults than the Australian sample (i.e., middle-aged women may be gaining weight at a lesser rate than other age groups). We coined the term “energy gap,” which estimates the excess daily energy intake over daily energy expenditure that produces weight gain. Estimating the energy gap can provide an indication of how much behavior change is required to prevent weight gain in any given population. For example, we estimated that if we could modify energy balance (any combination of reducing energy intake and increasing energy expenditure) by 100 kcal/d, we could prevent weight gain in 90% of the U.S. adult population (2). The implications of this research are that prevention of excessive weight gain could be accomplished through small behavior changes to “close” the energy gap. We have a poor ability to produce and maintain the large behavior changes required to treat overweight and obesity. We have a better chance of producing and sustaining small behavior changes that may be sufficient to prevent weight gain in most of the population. This small change approach can give us some needed optimism that we might actually be able to begin to turn the tide on the increasing prevalence of obesity. A feasible goal is to prevent weight gain in all adults, regard- less of their current weight status. A feasible goal for children is to prevent excessive weight gain, which can be identified for specific groups of children by identifying the energy gap. Some groups are gaining weight at a higher rate than others and will have a greater energy gap. For example, Butte et al. (3) have studied a group of low income Hispanic children who are highly susceptible to weight gain and have estimated the energy gap in this group to be 200 –250 kcal/d. Targeting weight gain prevention is a long-term strategy to reduce the prevalence of obesity, but it seems to be our most feasible strategy given our current inability to produce and sustain most behavior changes. It is important to realize that any changes in behavior, even small ones needed to close the energy gap, will be difficult to sustain for the majority of the population unless we are able to make changes in the environment to make it easier for people to maintain the behavior changes. To do this, we will have to address the way we build communities, the way we market food and physical inactivity, the way we aim policies regarding food and physical activity, and even the way our sociocultural beliefs shape our individual and collective behavior. References 1. Brown WU, Williams L, Ford JH, Ball K, Dobson AJ. Identifying the energy gap: magnitude and determinants of five-year weight gain in mid-age women. Obes Res. 2005;13: 1431– 41. 2. Hill JO, Wyatt HR, Reed GW, Peters JC. Obesity and the environment: where do we go from here? Science. 2003;299: 853–5. 3. Butte NF, Ellis KJ. Comment on “Obesity and the environ- ment: where do we go from here?” Science. 2003;301:598. Address correspondence to James O. Hill, Ph.D., University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Center for Human Nutrition, Box 263, 4200 East Ninth Avenue, Denver, CO 80262. E-mail: [email protected] Copyright © 2005 NAASO 1302 OBESITY RESEARCH Vol. 13 No. 8 August 2005

Upload: james-o-hill

Post on 21-Jul-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Commentary See Article by Brown et al. on pages 1431–1441

Preventing Excessive Weight GainJames O. Hill

In this issue of Obesity Research, Brown et al. (1) providemore evidence that the obesity epidemic has arisen fromgradual weight gain in the population produced by verysmall degrees of energy imbalance. The authors followedover 8000 middle-aged women in Australia for more than 5years, from 1996 to 2001. They found that the womengained an average of 0.5 kg/yr. They estimated that thisgradual weight gain represents an accumulation of �10kcal/d. This research supports our previous research show-ing that the average American adult gains 0.45–0.91 kg(1–2 lbs) each year, which would be an average accumula-tion of 15 kcal/d (2). There is an energy cost to storingexcess energy, which we estimated to be 50%, so that theactual degree of energy imbalance causing the weight gainin middle-aged Australian women would be �20 kcal/d and�30 kcal/d in the U.S. adult population. The higher imbal-ance in the U.S. could be because of a more “obesigenic”environment or because the U.S. sample includes a widerrange of adults than the Australian sample (i.e., middle-agedwomen may be gaining weight at a lesser rate than other agegroups).

We coined the term “energy gap,” which estimates theexcess daily energy intake over daily energy expenditurethat produces weight gain. Estimating the energy gap canprovide an indication of how much behavior change isrequired to prevent weight gain in any given population. Forexample, we estimated that if we could modify energybalance (any combination of reducing energy intake andincreasing energy expenditure) by 100 kcal/d, we couldprevent weight gain in 90% of the U.S. adult population (2).

The implications of this research are that prevention ofexcessive weight gain could be accomplished through smallbehavior changes to “close” the energy gap. We have a poorability to produce and maintain the large behavior changes

required to treat overweight and obesity. We have a betterchance of producing and sustaining small behavior changesthat may be sufficient to prevent weight gain in most of thepopulation. This small change approach can give us someneeded optimism that we might actually be able to begin toturn the tide on the increasing prevalence of obesity. Afeasible goal is to prevent weight gain in all adults, regard-less of their current weight status. A feasible goal forchildren is to prevent excessive weight gain, which can beidentified for specific groups of children by identifying theenergy gap. Some groups are gaining weight at a higher ratethan others and will have a greater energy gap. For example,Butte et al. (3) have studied a group of low income Hispanicchildren who are highly susceptible to weight gain and haveestimated the energy gap in this group to be 200–250kcal/d. Targeting weight gain prevention is a long-termstrategy to reduce the prevalence of obesity, but it seems tobe our most feasible strategy given our current inability toproduce and sustain most behavior changes.

It is important to realize that any changes in behavior,even small ones needed to close the energy gap, will bedifficult to sustain for the majority of the population unlesswe are able to make changes in the environment to make iteasier for people to maintain the behavior changes. To dothis, we will have to address the way we build communities,the way we market food and physical inactivity, the way weaim policies regarding food and physical activity, and eventhe way our sociocultural beliefs shape our individual andcollective behavior.

References1. Brown WU, Williams L, Ford JH, Ball K, Dobson AJ.

Identifying the energy gap: magnitude and determinants offive-year weight gain in mid-age women. Obes Res. 2005;13:1431–41.

2. Hill JO, Wyatt HR, Reed GW, Peters JC. Obesity and theenvironment: where do we go from here? Science. 2003;299:853–5.

3. Butte NF, Ellis KJ. Comment on “Obesity and the environ-ment: where do we go from here?” Science. 2003;301:598.

Address correspondence to James O. Hill, Ph.D., University of Colorado Health SciencesCenter, Center for Human Nutrition, Box 263, 4200 East Ninth Avenue, Denver, CO 80262.E-mail: [email protected] © 2005 NAASO

1302 OBESITY RESEARCH Vol. 13 No. 8 August 2005