preview of “anorexic ks outline”

6
MOC P. SPAIN GFW 3CD Mutual Assent Offer and Acceptance  Lonegran, Izazi, Normille v.Miller Rev. v. Irrev.  Baird, Berryman, Star Paving v. Drennan, Firm Offer 2-205 indefiniteness Texaco, Walker v. Keith Acceptance Battle of Forms  Princess UCC 2-207  Hercules Option ks separate consideration,  Normille v. Miller Consideration RSMT 79  Hamer v. Sidway  Bataskis Pre-Exisiting duty Moral Obligation Webb v. McGowin Bilateral ks mutuality Promissory Estoppel RSMT 90 1) promise? Grenier v. Grenier 2) promisor should have forseen reliance by other party? inducement, totality of circumstances-->  Drennan 3) actual reliance?  justified?  Katz v. Danny Dare 4) injustice only avoided? RSMT 45-Cook v.Coldwell Banker Statute of Frauds 1) Is it in SOF? WOMAN 2) is there a writing and does it comply material terms w/ sufficient certainty? 3

Upload: agr0n9

Post on 10-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Preview of “anorexic ks outline”

8/8/2019 Preview of “anorexic ks outline”

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/preview-of-anorexic-ks-outline 1/6

MOC P. SPAIN GFW 3CD

Mutual Assent

Offer and Acceptance

Lonegran, Izazi, Normille v.Miller

Rev. v. Irrev. Baird, Berryman, Star Paving v. Drennan, Firm Offer 2-205

indefinitenessTexaco, Walker v. Keith

AcceptanceBattle of Forms

Princess

UCC 2-207 Hercules

Option ksseparate consideration, Normille v. Miller

Consideration

RSMT 79 Hamer v. Sidway

Bataskis

Pre-Exisiting dutyMoral Obligation

Webb v. McGowin

Bilateral ksmutuality

Promissory Estoppel

RSMT 901) promise? Grenier v. Grenier

2) promisor should have forseen reliance by other party?

inducement, totality of circumstances--> Drennan3) actual reliance?

justified? Katz v. Danny Dare

4) injustice only avoided?RSMT 45- Cook v.Coldwell Banker

Statute of Frauds

1) Is it in SOF?WOMAN

2) is there a writing and does it comply material terms w/ sufficient certainty?

3

Page 2: Preview of “anorexic ks outline”

8/8/2019 Preview of “anorexic ks outline”

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/preview-of-anorexic-ks-outline 2/6

Essential terms (parties, length, k terms) Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden

3) If fails, unenforceable unless..sub performance, PE- Alaska Democratic Party v. Rice

Parol Evidence Rule

UCC 2-202/RSMT 213If writing is incomplete integration, can bring in evidence but can't contradict

Nanakuli

4 corners (williston)Thompson v. Libby

Modern (Corbin)Taylor v. State Farm

Merger ClauseSherrod

Interpretation

look at k, what terms mean, how parties dealt withrule then exceptions

Frigalimnent v. BNS

cop--> cod-->tu

Good Faith (306, 205)

Wood v. Lucy Lady Duff

UCC 2-306(2)-good faith in exclusive dealigsSiedenberg

Sons of Thunder- fruits of k RSMT 205-good faith in conduct or transaction occured

Warrranties Bayliner

UCC 2-313express, "affirmation of fact or promise basis of bargain"

UCC 2-314implied, must be merchant"fit for ordinary purposes for which such goods are used"

UCC 2-315 parti purpose1) seller knows of purpose, 2) seller knows buyer relying on, 3) actualreliance

UCC 2-316disclaimer-any attempt to exclude that which is absolutely inconsistent fallsaway

Avoidance Doctrine (NP, CD, UMU)DTR

CapacityMaterial Beneift- Dodson v. Shreader

Mental Incapacity- Hauer v. Union

Page 3: Preview of “anorexic ks outline”

8/8/2019 Preview of “anorexic ks outline”

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/preview-of-anorexic-ks-outline 3/6

1) unable to act reasonably in relation to transaction2) other party should know

Duress-INC ( Totem v. Alyeska)

Non-disclosure- Hill v. Jones

PP- Valley Medical v. Farber scope?Unconscionable

Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture

Higgins v. Superrior Court CaliUCC 2-302/ RSMT 208

Undue Influence-"overbargaining"Oddorizi v. Bloomingfieild

MisrepresentationSyster v. Banta

Non Performance

MistakeRSMT 153

1) erroneous relation to fact, 2) basis of assumption ( Sherwood v.

Walker) , 3) material, 4) no risk ( Lenawee Co v. Messerly

RSMT 154-unilateral4+ Equity

1) unconscionable, 2) other party's interestsImp/imp/fop

EARR

Imp-RMST 455, UCC 2-613

Taylor v. Caldwell Imp UCC 2-615, RSMT 261,FOP, UCC 2-615, RSMT 265

Krell v. Henry

forseeabilty+ totalitymodification

pre-existing duty Alaska Packers

UCC 2-209(2)- good faith

RSMT 89-fair and equitable

3rd Parties (Assignment and Delegation)

Incidental v. IntentionalRSMT 302

recognition of right of the performance is appropriate to effectuate theintentions of the parties and

monies or promisee intended to give right to beneficiaryVogan v. Hayes Appraisal

Defenses

Page 4: Preview of “anorexic ks outline”

8/8/2019 Preview of “anorexic ks outline”

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/preview-of-anorexic-ks-outline 4/6

RSMT-309Assignment and Delegation

right-almost always assignableRSMT 317,

1) rights, 2) exceptions-material adverse effect, conflict w/ statuteUCC 2-210

duties-generally not delegable unless $

Sally Beauty Co v. NexxusUCC 2-210 -substantial interest in original party's performanceRSMT 318- against PP or terms of original promise

Conditions, Material Breach, Anticipatory Repudiation

Express Conditions-litterally performedRSMT 224Oppenhiemer v. Oppenheim

To mute: 1)waiver, 2) prevention doctrine, 3) estoppel, 4) relief fromforeiture

Constructive ConditionsSubstantial performance- Jacob & Youngs v. Kent

MBRSMT 241

courts look to extent of 1)injured parties deprived of expected benefit2) compensation possible3)party failing to perform suffer forefiture

4)party failing will cure failureAR

Must make clear intent, UCC 2-610, RSMT 250Adequate Assurance-UCC 2-609, RSMT 251

Hornell Brewing v.Spry

Damages

Expectation

benefit of bargain Roesch v. Bray , UCC 2-708

Damages=value lost+other loss (conseq)-cost avoided-loss avoidedForeseeable- Hadley v. Baxendale

Hadley v. Baxendale UCC 2-715, RSMT 351also required for consq. RSMT 351, 352

Mitgating- Havill v. Woodstock, Handicapped Children v. Ludawicz

Certainty

Reliance

still requires FMC RSMT 352

use in

Page 5: Preview of “anorexic ks outline”

8/8/2019 Preview of “anorexic ks outline”

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/preview-of-anorexic-ks-outline 5/6

PE-Wasler v.Toyota

can't calculate expected w/ certainty- Wartzman v. Hightower

RSMT 349d="core reliance damages+incidental

Restitution

Quantam Meritk loser

Alegenon Blair RSMT 373quasi k

Lancelloti

Gratiutousness + officousnessWebb v.McGowin, Watts v. Watts

RSMT 347-recovery is reasonable value of performance

Non-Recoverable

punitive-insuranceatty fees- Zapata, UCC 2-710, 2-715emotional-RSMT 353, Erlich v. Menezes

Specific Performance

City Stores v. Ammerman

RSMT 359, UCC 2-709

Liquidated Damages

West Haven Associates

Buyers/Sellers UCC

SellersUCC 2-508

buyer can't cancel if time remaining to fixUCC 2-602

rejection must be made in reasonable time to give noticeUCC 2-703f

seller can cancel if buyer wrongfully rejects, damages based on resale/mkt

UCC 2-706seller can recover (k price-retail price)

UCC 2-708if mkt measure inadequte, "benefit of bargain"lost volume

UCC 2-709 (class of '09)specific performance, accepted goods, risk of loss, unable to sell w/reasonable efforts

UCC 2-710

seller's incidental damages, atty fees

Page 6: Preview of “anorexic ks outline”

8/8/2019 Preview of “anorexic ks outline”

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/preview-of-anorexic-ks-outline 6/6

Buyer

UCC 2-602rejection must be in reasonable time to give notice

UCC 2-711 (if I go to 7-11)seller fails to deliver, buyer can cancel, recover what paid + damages

UCC 2-712 (12th man "uncover")recover difference between cover price and k +incid/consq damages

UCC 2-714 buyer who retains goods, still recover damages, (goods delivered-goodswarranted)

UCC 2-715 buyer's incidental (out of pocket)

UCC 2-716 buyer doesn't recieve goods and doesn't cancel, specific performance