preview of “anorexic ks outline”
TRANSCRIPT
8/8/2019 Preview of “anorexic ks outline”
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/preview-of-anorexic-ks-outline 1/6
MOC P. SPAIN GFW 3CD
Mutual Assent
Offer and Acceptance
Lonegran, Izazi, Normille v.Miller
Rev. v. Irrev. Baird, Berryman, Star Paving v. Drennan, Firm Offer 2-205
indefinitenessTexaco, Walker v. Keith
AcceptanceBattle of Forms
Princess
UCC 2-207 Hercules
Option ksseparate consideration, Normille v. Miller
Consideration
RSMT 79 Hamer v. Sidway
Bataskis
Pre-Exisiting dutyMoral Obligation
Webb v. McGowin
Bilateral ksmutuality
Promissory Estoppel
RSMT 901) promise? Grenier v. Grenier
2) promisor should have forseen reliance by other party?
inducement, totality of circumstances--> Drennan3) actual reliance?
justified? Katz v. Danny Dare
4) injustice only avoided?RSMT 45- Cook v.Coldwell Banker
Statute of Frauds
1) Is it in SOF?WOMAN
2) is there a writing and does it comply material terms w/ sufficient certainty?
3
8/8/2019 Preview of “anorexic ks outline”
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/preview-of-anorexic-ks-outline 2/6
Essential terms (parties, length, k terms) Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden
3) If fails, unenforceable unless..sub performance, PE- Alaska Democratic Party v. Rice
Parol Evidence Rule
UCC 2-202/RSMT 213If writing is incomplete integration, can bring in evidence but can't contradict
Nanakuli
4 corners (williston)Thompson v. Libby
Modern (Corbin)Taylor v. State Farm
Merger ClauseSherrod
Interpretation
look at k, what terms mean, how parties dealt withrule then exceptions
Frigalimnent v. BNS
cop--> cod-->tu
Good Faith (306, 205)
Wood v. Lucy Lady Duff
UCC 2-306(2)-good faith in exclusive dealigsSiedenberg
Sons of Thunder- fruits of k RSMT 205-good faith in conduct or transaction occured
Warrranties Bayliner
UCC 2-313express, "affirmation of fact or promise basis of bargain"
UCC 2-314implied, must be merchant"fit for ordinary purposes for which such goods are used"
UCC 2-315 parti purpose1) seller knows of purpose, 2) seller knows buyer relying on, 3) actualreliance
UCC 2-316disclaimer-any attempt to exclude that which is absolutely inconsistent fallsaway
Avoidance Doctrine (NP, CD, UMU)DTR
CapacityMaterial Beneift- Dodson v. Shreader
Mental Incapacity- Hauer v. Union
8/8/2019 Preview of “anorexic ks outline”
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/preview-of-anorexic-ks-outline 3/6
1) unable to act reasonably in relation to transaction2) other party should know
Duress-INC ( Totem v. Alyeska)
Non-disclosure- Hill v. Jones
PP- Valley Medical v. Farber scope?Unconscionable
Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture
Higgins v. Superrior Court CaliUCC 2-302/ RSMT 208
Undue Influence-"overbargaining"Oddorizi v. Bloomingfieild
MisrepresentationSyster v. Banta
Non Performance
MistakeRSMT 153
1) erroneous relation to fact, 2) basis of assumption ( Sherwood v.
Walker) , 3) material, 4) no risk ( Lenawee Co v. Messerly
RSMT 154-unilateral4+ Equity
1) unconscionable, 2) other party's interestsImp/imp/fop
EARR
Imp-RMST 455, UCC 2-613
Taylor v. Caldwell Imp UCC 2-615, RSMT 261,FOP, UCC 2-615, RSMT 265
Krell v. Henry
forseeabilty+ totalitymodification
pre-existing duty Alaska Packers
UCC 2-209(2)- good faith
RSMT 89-fair and equitable
3rd Parties (Assignment and Delegation)
Incidental v. IntentionalRSMT 302
recognition of right of the performance is appropriate to effectuate theintentions of the parties and
monies or promisee intended to give right to beneficiaryVogan v. Hayes Appraisal
Defenses
8/8/2019 Preview of “anorexic ks outline”
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/preview-of-anorexic-ks-outline 4/6
RSMT-309Assignment and Delegation
right-almost always assignableRSMT 317,
1) rights, 2) exceptions-material adverse effect, conflict w/ statuteUCC 2-210
duties-generally not delegable unless $
Sally Beauty Co v. NexxusUCC 2-210 -substantial interest in original party's performanceRSMT 318- against PP or terms of original promise
Conditions, Material Breach, Anticipatory Repudiation
Express Conditions-litterally performedRSMT 224Oppenhiemer v. Oppenheim
To mute: 1)waiver, 2) prevention doctrine, 3) estoppel, 4) relief fromforeiture
Constructive ConditionsSubstantial performance- Jacob & Youngs v. Kent
MBRSMT 241
courts look to extent of 1)injured parties deprived of expected benefit2) compensation possible3)party failing to perform suffer forefiture
4)party failing will cure failureAR
Must make clear intent, UCC 2-610, RSMT 250Adequate Assurance-UCC 2-609, RSMT 251
Hornell Brewing v.Spry
Damages
Expectation
benefit of bargain Roesch v. Bray , UCC 2-708
Damages=value lost+other loss (conseq)-cost avoided-loss avoidedForeseeable- Hadley v. Baxendale
Hadley v. Baxendale UCC 2-715, RSMT 351also required for consq. RSMT 351, 352
Mitgating- Havill v. Woodstock, Handicapped Children v. Ludawicz
Certainty
Reliance
still requires FMC RSMT 352
use in
8/8/2019 Preview of “anorexic ks outline”
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/preview-of-anorexic-ks-outline 5/6
PE-Wasler v.Toyota
can't calculate expected w/ certainty- Wartzman v. Hightower
RSMT 349d="core reliance damages+incidental
Restitution
Quantam Meritk loser
Alegenon Blair RSMT 373quasi k
Lancelloti
Gratiutousness + officousnessWebb v.McGowin, Watts v. Watts
RSMT 347-recovery is reasonable value of performance
Non-Recoverable
punitive-insuranceatty fees- Zapata, UCC 2-710, 2-715emotional-RSMT 353, Erlich v. Menezes
Specific Performance
City Stores v. Ammerman
RSMT 359, UCC 2-709
Liquidated Damages
West Haven Associates
Buyers/Sellers UCC
SellersUCC 2-508
buyer can't cancel if time remaining to fixUCC 2-602
rejection must be made in reasonable time to give noticeUCC 2-703f
seller can cancel if buyer wrongfully rejects, damages based on resale/mkt
UCC 2-706seller can recover (k price-retail price)
UCC 2-708if mkt measure inadequte, "benefit of bargain"lost volume
UCC 2-709 (class of '09)specific performance, accepted goods, risk of loss, unable to sell w/reasonable efforts
UCC 2-710
seller's incidental damages, atty fees
8/8/2019 Preview of “anorexic ks outline”
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/preview-of-anorexic-ks-outline 6/6
Buyer
UCC 2-602rejection must be in reasonable time to give notice
UCC 2-711 (if I go to 7-11)seller fails to deliver, buyer can cancel, recover what paid + damages
UCC 2-712 (12th man "uncover")recover difference between cover price and k +incid/consq damages
UCC 2-714 buyer who retains goods, still recover damages, (goods delivered-goodswarranted)
UCC 2-715 buyer's incidental (out of pocket)
UCC 2-716 buyer doesn't recieve goods and doesn't cancel, specific performance