prigogine vs. gal-or debate & paradoxes revealed by gravitism
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
1/37
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
2/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
The Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Paradox and Debate
While Prigogine won the Noble Prize in chemistry for his formalism in converting
symmetry Dynamics into Irreversible Thermodynamics [18], he did not really tellus how irreversible changes in living and non-living systems emerge from the
reversible mathematical equations of physics. In turn, as we had debated during the
historic Pittsburgh Conference on Classical and Relativistic Thermodynamics [18],
Gravitism [12-17] is asserted to be superior for it draws the same formalism [17,
Lecture VI] from two reliable and independent sources:
(1) The THEORETICAL: Einsteins Field Equations [EFE, or Gravity
Physics] accept no static cosmological solutions, namely, time itself, the
arrow of time and all irreversibilities in Nature, originate from Einsteins
General Relativity.Moreover, there is no need to resort to the fallacious and essentially
anthropomorphic concept entropy, which is neither mass nor energy.
Instead, the science of evolving dynamic systems and thermodynamics
must only be based on the physically sound, directly measurable,
dissipated energy that is derived from the EGR or from Newtonian
Gravity [17].
(2) The EMPIRICAL: Measured dynamics of energy-dissipation in expanding
voids between superclusters and clusters of galaxies [Figs. 1.1 and 1.2;
References 1 to 11] give rise to the 2nd Law in non-living and living SystemsDynamics [17].
Instead, Prigogine introduces the concept Symmetry Breaking, which is actually
breaking the law of symmetry conservation:
If one starts his formalism with the time-symmetric (reversible) equations of
all physics, he cannot end up with the time asymmetric equations of
thermodynamics.
In other words:
It is not science to smuggle irreversibility into the reversible equations of
physics without declaring the contraband.
2
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
3/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
Fig. 1.2: The Paradox involved in the Crisis about the Origin of time,Arrows of Time, Entropy Growth and all Irreversibilities in Nature.
Astronomical-astrophysical scales are expressed in terms of Light Years [ly],as demonstrated by Figs. 1.1 and 1.2.The 100 million lyscale depicted in Fig.
1.1 is ten times larger than that in Fig. 1.2. (Light Year is the distance
electromagnetic waves, including photons as light, travel during 100 million yearsat 300,000 km/sec.) Such actual scales translate into enormous delay times for light
from distant worlds to reach us.
3
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
4/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
Fig. 1.3: Our Non-Expanding Neighborhood is home to thousands of
galaxies. These are wrapped around by darkSPACE-3. Located in the Local
Group of about 30 galaxies [picture center], we feel its coldness each night. But
there is much more to say about this information. (Image Source: NASA/Wikipedia)
FIRST, most of the shining galaxies shown are assumed to contain super
massive black hole 6 at their center. Each Galactic Center therefore acts as a
gigantic matter-energy sinkin the immediate neighborhood of the black hole.
SECONDLY, black holes are neither universal nor the largest
thermodynamic sinks. The gigantic amount of radiation energy poured out
from all the shining galaxies is evenly dispersed in all space directions, and is
always proceeding from Space-3 into Space-2 that wraps clusters of galaxies.
Therefore, only a very small portion of this wide-spread universal radiation
energy reaches and irreversibly dissipated in galactic centers. In fact, most of it
4
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
5/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
proceeds outside the dark space that dominates Fig. 1.3, thereby being
irreversiblydissipated in expanding Space-1.
THIRDLY, and most important, without the observed Space-1 expansion, the
density of radiation energy (Fig. 1.2) in Spaces 1, 2 and 3, would increase with
time, eventually reaching the highest temperatures maintained by nuclearfusion4 in active stellar cores, causing not only our roasting on earth and
disintegrations of the all structures, but eventual equilibrium throughout all
space. So if we owe our life to the universal rules of physics and bio-physics,
we specifically owe it to Space-1 expansion.
The apparent paradox involved here is what causes what: Said dynamics give
rise to the 2nd Law of thermodynamics, or vice versa.
Gravitism is based on the first assertion. In other words, space-1 expansion is
the prime cause of cosmic time, the Master Arrow of Time, the origin ofentropy growth and ofall observed irreversibilities in Nature.
Next we plunge into specific verifiable facts that illustrate and support the
universal scales and dynamics of involved in the meaning of Gravitism.
OurLOCAL GROUP contains some 30 galaxies of different size and shape. Each
galaxy contains billions of active stars.
Superclusters Virgo include over 2,500 galaxies and is about 50,000,000 lightyears away from us. It stretches about 20,000,000 light years in diameter.
Only Fig. 1.1 -- on a 10 times bigger scale shows our nearby Coma
Superclusters, which contain about 800 major galaxies. Also the nearby
superclusters Hydra are out of the picture.
Further away are superclusters Hercules, which is about 50,000,000 light years
across -- the home of about 5,000,000 galaxies.
OurMilky-Way galaxy is less than a spot in the large-scale portrait of our visibleuniverse. [Fig. 1.1]. While our galaxy harbors billions of sun-like stars, it is only
0.1 million light years across. The distance from us to our sun is about 8 light
minutes.
5
http://home.honolulu.hawaii.edu/~pine/coma.htmhttp://home.honolulu.hawaii.edu/~pine/coma.htm -
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
6/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
Fig. 1.4: The Fundamentals of Gravitism vs. the Earliest Dark Voids (dark
blue) that had startedour endless world differentiation and aggregations and
have thus given rise to the history of our cold night sky and the cold-hot
world at large. (Fig. 1.3). (Image Source: Wikipedia)
The first-ever dark voids shown are the earliest differentiated components of
expanding SPACE-1 that wraps around the yellow-green-red hot sources and
irreversibly absorbs all the radiation poured into the voids from the
gravitationally-condensing, and, therefore, heated material emitters. (Fig. 1.2).
The universal differentiation-aggregation is isotropic and homogeneous.
The First Tools of Gravitism
Assertion 1:
To study the expansion of a single Space-1 cell (adiabatic envelope 7) that
wraps around a typical emitter, is equivalent to the study of the expansion of
the entire universe.
Assertion 2:
Dynamics and thermodynamic in such a single cell represent those of the entireuniverse.
Assertions 1 and 2 are based on the observed isotropic and homogeneous
distribution of the cosmic dark voids in both Figs. 1.1 and 1.4 and the science of
fusion. (Footnote 4).
6
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
7/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
With the additional definition of supernovae (Footnote 5), it also means that the
same max temperatures characterize all cosmic material emitters -- qualities that
have been approximately preserved as the universe has further expanded into
what is shown in Fig. 1.1.
Assertion 3:
SPACE-I expansion comprises the earliest and most universal clock. We therefore
define this unidirectional time as the 1st Cosmological Arrow of Time (Fig. 1.2) or
THE MASTER TIME ASYMMETRY of all processes in the universe, including
those of the living systems.
Assertion 4:
Socio dynamics on earth are subject to the same laws of physics and chemistry as in
the large-scale foundations of Gravitism. Said down-scaled dynamics are
demonstrated and explained in Lectures 1 and 2.
7
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
8/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
Lecture
1Synopsis
Starting from this Lecture, we search for the earliest and most remote origins oftime, arrows of time, irreversibilities, entropy growth, life and social dynamics.
Socio-dynamics deals with the origin of the most private and collective traits ofhumanity and civilization. Example: Why people dynamics cannot be ruled under
the objective dynamics that control the entire physical universe? Is there a
verifiable, large-scale, physico-chemical cause-and-effect that has given rise to
some destructive forces of humanity? What should be the science that deals with
this fundamental phenomenon during all historical times?
The methodology employed is to detect interconnecting facts that support the
optionalworld outlook provided by Gravitism, using minimal pre-suppositions
and imposed axioms. Though some fragments of these facts are scattered
throughout the literature on specific problems, there is yet no dedicatedprofessional framework to deal with the subject matter.
The subject matter has never before been presented as a unified field of study,
partially because it covers a relatively new field of integrated studies, and
partially because specialized fragments are scattered throughout the literature on
specific problems. As a result, different socio-proponents have approached this
subject from widely varying and sometimes misleading viewpoints, employing
disjointed concepts to what should be a unified methodology.
Consequently, these Lectures depart from traditional, isolated texts, in
emphasizing the interconnectedness of updated facts in different and apparently
unrelated disciplines. Thus, in trying to develop a new INTEGRATED
METHODOLOGY, we refrain from repeating well-known but isolated analyses,
and, instead, stress the integrated consequences from the point of view of large-
scale physics and bio-chemistry that, combined, are termed Gravitism.
8
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
9/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
For the sake of unification and simplicity, the physico-chemical supporting facts
are first introduced in as simple a manner as possible, using illustrated graphs,
pictures and drawings that can lead to testable consequences.
Verified evidence cannot yet be admitted to a number of topics presented here.
Therefore, if scientists are counted as moderate skeptics, as no doubt they
should, they must adopt the practice of suspend judgment. By this we do not
mean radical empiricism, or the denial of any rational addition to sociology. Thus,
we refrain from leaving the study of Gravitism in the various domains of socio-
dynamics to the sole care of disciplinary sociologists.
Gravitism: From Large to Small-Scale Systems Dynamics
Differences begin on the largest and earliest scales of the visible universe, asdemonstrated in Figs. 1.1 and 1.4. We first focus on the shining emitters vis--vis
the dark-cold cosmological Voids that absorb all the outpouring radiation, as
marked in Figs. 1.1 and 1.2.
It is an undisputed evidence that the dark voids not only expand, but their expansion
is accelerated [1-5, 7, 9, 10, 20-52, 55]. This expansion, we assert and discuss
below, not only causes the 2nd Law ofthermodynamics of living systems [12-16],
but via the Einsteinian-Gravity-Based evolution of galaxies, stars, planets andbiophysics, has generated all life and its diversity. [17 and below].
SUPPORTING FACTS:
1) The core pillar of modern astronomy and astrophysics is the empirical
HUBBLE LAW. It is based on verified observations since first discovered by
Hubble in the 1920s. [1-4, 7, 9, 11, 52, 53, 55]1,2.
Hubble Law is marked in Fig. 1.2 as Uo=Hor,
where r is the distance from earth to CLUSTER I.
r represents superclusters or a cluster of galaxies shown in Fig. 1.1. Here Ho is the
Hubble Constant and Uo the recession velocity, namely, how fast the observed
9
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
10/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
astronomical object is receding away from us, or how fast R(t) is increasing with
time, or how fast SPACE-1 is increasing with time.
2) SPACE -1 wraps all superclusters of galaxies.3 It contains all expanding dark
voids shown in both Figs. 1.1 and 1.4. It does not, however, includes the non
expanding superclusters.
3) SPACE 2 wraps around but does not include the non-expanding clusters of
galaxies, galaxies, stars, planets, moons, etc.
4) SPACE-3 wraps around but does not include the non-expanding moon, earth,
solar system, and galaxies. [Cf. Figs. 1.2 and 1.3].
At this point one may wonder
How such remote dynamics can affect us here-now?
To start with, we resort to a few additional assertions that relate to this common but
legitimate question:
Assertion 5:
To deny today the central role of astronomy and astrophysics in physics, is to deny
the very methodology of science, and to a priori reject a large portion of its verified
empirical evidence.
Assertion 6:
We are linked here-now to what is going on far out there by resorting to a thought
experiment:
SPACE-I stops expanding now, thereby the stellar radiation energy density
marked in Fig. 1.2 gradually rises all over spaces 3, 2 and 1, eventually causing the
entire universe to reach equilibrium [uniform temperature/energy-density],
whereby all processes in the universe stop, including life on earth.
Assertion-Factual Evidence 7:
The Cosmic Blackbody Microwave Background Radiation of the Early
Expanding Universe (discovered in 1964; Cf. Fig. 1.4), is the remnant left-over
radiation that has been expanded and cooled by SPACE-1-Expansion during the
13.72 (less about 500,000) billion years since creation -- the so-called Big
Bang. This radiation has been cooled down from about 4,000-3,000 K, and it
10
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
11/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
engulfs us here-now, as a reliable reminder that it constitutes a most direct
proof that SPACE-1 has indeed been expanding and is isotropic [the same in all
directions] and homogeneous.
Upscaling 1: Since Space-1 is expanding -- and its expansion rate has beenobservationally proved as being accelerated -- the universe is unidirectionally
cooling down forever. The corollary is that eventually all energy density
gradients depicted in Fig, 1.2 and in the solar system8 -- would flat, and all
processes here and there would stop in what is called the final cold death.
Downscaling 1: Said expansion generates the observed large-scale energy-density
gradients [Fig. 1.2], which, in turn, generate small-scale stellar and planetary
temperature gradients the ones that allow life to emerge and be sustained. [17].
Downscaling 2: Einsteinian gravity [general relativistic physics] is well-approximated by Newtonian Physics as one goes down the scales of size-mass.
Accordingly, above a certain size-mass, all is structured by specific gravity, the
heaviest components down in the core; the lightest up at the top. We term this
phenomenon gravitationally-induced selectivity or gravitationally-induced
survival of the fittest. [Lecture 2].
Downscaling 3: Adiabatic envelopes7 in the observed homogeneous and
isotropic universe are always located between any pair of superclusters or clusters
of galaxies. [Fig. 1.2]. Collecting all said spots forms Space-1 cells (adiabaticsurfaces-envelopes around superclusters or clusters7), each of which evolves as
representative of the entire universe that we cannot observe due to the event
horizon/Space-1-expansion discussed next.
Is the Maximum Speed of Light Violated?
The universal maximum speed of light is not violated when sectors of the
universe recede away from us [the Hubble expansion] at speeds higher than the
speed of light.
The expansion of the universe generates a large-scale event horizon an
observational limit for us to see the entire universe; namely, the light from such
far away receding emitters is gradually being redshifted until the most remote
sources totally disappear from our sights, for ever. Consequently, there is no
option but to study cells of the universe, like that shown in Fig. 1.1, or by the
11
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
12/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
adiabatic cells discussed above. However, the portion of the universe shown in
Fig. 1.1 is shrinking in time, not so our nearby selected adiabatic cell. Why?
Much of what we now observe in Fig. 1.1 would be unobservable in the future,
and forever lost to our sciences.
The relevance of Einsteins General Relativity in Gravitism
Einsteins General Relativity (EGR) is expressed by his field equations [17].
Without the so-called cosmological constant [20-51] EGR accepts no plausible
static cosmological solutions.
Thus, according to Einstein, the 1916 EGR had predicted the expansion of the
universe before Hubble detected it in the mid 1920s.
From this point of view our new astrophysical school of systems dynamics and
thermodynamics it is the agreement with EGR and said Einsteinian outlook, that
this outlook is deeply rooted in EGR.
Concluding Remarks;
A. If one retains the cosmological constant in EGR, which Einstein had rejected
due to the Hubble discovery in the mid 1920s, it well-explains the role of thespeculated dark energy and dark matter that are claimed, without strict
observational evidence, to fill the universe and explain its observed accelerated
expansion to a cold death. [20-51].
B. These matters bring this Lecture to a close.
C. String theories, black holes, gravity-based linguistics, Limitations of
Theories, dark matter and dark energy are treated in the next online Lectures.
12
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
13/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
FOOTNOTES
1. Einstein General Relativity (EGR) may also be referred to asEinsteins Gravity Physics.
Fundamental physics should the same for all observers, accelerating linearly,
rotating, standing on a small astronomical body, like earth, or on a massive star.
This need provides the basis for using coordinate translators that we call tensors.
EGRis expressed in terms of Einstein local metric tensor and its curved space-time mathematical derivatives [Volume I, Ref. 17].
Distances deduced theoretically can thus be determined locally between two
infinitesimally close points in curved space-time. It is, therefore, an unresolved
issue to determine within the framework of each model, how to evaluate large
distances between two distant points.
The issue should not be confused with the fact that SPACE-1 [the Master Black
Sink] size increases with time. Yet, in debating the validity of each proposedmodel, one must specify the space-time-curvature -- the curve-path-of-light that
connects two such cosmic-apart points. Unfortunately, for the theoretician who
wishes to gain support for his own specific model, that determination depends on
HIS OWNselected cosmological model.
In the Commoving Distance Model, for instance, commoving distances cannot
be fixed. In practice, the distance of distant objects are best measured by their
luminosity -- which is reduced by the square power of the distance to the
radiation source [17] and by the redshifts of their incoming electromagnetic
radiation.
2. The Expanding Universe and Hubble law.
Hubbles astronomical observations prove that all clusters and super-clusters of
galaxies [Fig. 1.1] are moving away from each other with speeds that are
proportional to their distance from each other and , therefore, also from earth.
13
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
14/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
Observations, including the 1964 discovery of the microwave black body
radiation, prove that the expansion of SPACE-1 is the same in all directions
(isotropic and homogeneous).
Isotropic distribution across the sky of distant gamma-ray bursts and ofsupernovae also support this general conclusion.
Our Net Motion in Space is about 400 km/sec. But this motion is not easy to
comprehend. The direction of the earths net motion lies in the same plane as its
orbit around the sun and at angle of 61 degrees tilted upward [northward] from
the plane of the disk-like Milky Way. We travel around the sun at about 30
km/sec.
These speeds should not be confused with the recession speed of clusters andsuper-clusters of galaxies away from each other. [R(t) Fig. 1.2]. This is the
Hubble expansion. Our galaxyis deviating from this uniform expansion motion
by about 600 km/sec.
3. Superclusters of galaxies, galaxies and our Milky Way
The shapes of superclusters vary considerably; from that of Virgo, Coma and
Hercules to long filaments. [Figs. 1.1
and 1.3]. 9,11
Our Milky-Way Galaxy 8 contains
billions of gravity-compacted stars and
other entities. Most stars are formed in
the dilute regions of the rotating inter-
stellar SPACE-3.
Our galaxy is almost 100,000 light-
years in diameter at its disk-like
longest spiral arms. It is in the form ofan almost flat spiral disk with an
average thickness of about 1,000 light-
years away from it center
Fig. 1.5: The Fog visible around this galaxy is composed of millions of
stars like our sun a reminder of the scales we discuss [12-18].
14
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
15/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
All Superclusters are receding away from us -- and from each other -- at great
speeds -- the further away they are, the greater is the observed speed. This fact is
termed the EXPANDING UNIVERSE. The receding superclusters follow the
observationally-based Hubble Law [R(t) in Fig. 1.2].
Spaces 3, 2 and 1 contain the cosmic black-body remnant radiation, stellarphotons, neutrinos, antineutrinos, gas, dust, etc. Intra-galactic gas may emit X-
rays and other types of radiation.
Andromeda (M31) is a member of our Local Group of galaxies. It is
characterized by a spiral structure similar to ours, and is located about 2,200,000
light-years away. Andromedaand our galaxy are the largest in our Local Group,
which is about 10,000,000 light-years in its largest spatial diameter, namely, the
size of our local group is about 100 times the size of our galaxy. Our local
group includes M31 (Andromeda), M49, M58, M59, M60, M61, M84, M86, M87
and M89.
Radiation pressure on any test-surface facing the lowest radiation-energy density
value in the universe [adiabatic envelopes in mid cold Voids of SPACE-1, are
less than that exerted by radiation impinging on that test surface from the other
side, namely, from the one facing the source of radiation. (This is the familiar
phenomenon behind SOLAR SAILS in space research.)
The result is the universal driving force for energy transport from all hot radiation
sources to cold SPACE-1, whereby the energy-density gradients inside adiabatic
envelopes constitute the driving force of all irreversible processes in K for all theenergy outpouring into it from all shining sources.
SPACE-1 expansion is the prime mover of all irreversible processes in nature.
Nature, and of the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
Conclusion: With or without localized black holes, only expanding, cold,
SPACE-1 [the Master Black Sink] provides us, with the universal,
UNSATURABLE SINK, the cause of the 2nd Law.
4. Nuclear Fusion is caused by the force-pressure of gravity in the core ofactive stars. It transforms (fuses) hydrogen plasma into heavier elements, like
carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, carbon, phosphor, iron. Fusion is the most
important process in the universe.
All active stars generate in their interiors all the basic chemical elements beyond
hydrogen and helium; namely, all the heavier basic elements of matter that we
15
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
16/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
observe on earth and in our body and brain.
According to both Einsteinian and Newtonian physics, the bigger the mass of a
star, the higher are its core pressures and temperatures and faster are the nuclear
fusion processes in its interior [17].
How do we know that?On both fusion and fission scientists know much. Fusion is also the driver of
hydrogen-bomb explosions, (not fission as in atomic reactors and in regular
atomic weapons).
When a certain amount of iron is formed in the interiors of active stars,
endothermic reaction replaces the exothermic one. (The exothermic reaction
generates energy in the stars, while the endothermic one consumes it.)
All active stars produce energy through such nuclear fusion.
5. Supernovae, Maximum Temperatures, Redshifts & Measuring
Astronomical Distances.
All active (shining) stars generate the heavier chemical elements at the high
temperatures-pressures that gravity induces in their interiors. But the massive
stars arrive to that End-of-life Stage earlier than smaller stars do. That End-
of-life Stage may, however, be the Beginning-of-life-Process in case the
supernova debris (ashes) gradually form orbiting planets around stars, as is the
case that we assert was the beginning of our solar system.
Supernovae are gravity-induced phenomena that astronomers observe in galaxies
when a massive star ends its life by internal collapse-implosion. The collapse
begins when the fusion process that produces energy, ends.
Supernovae are not only the originators of all chemistry beyond hydrogen and
helium [by nuclear fusion.], but serve in astronomy as reliable distance
yardsticks [candles] on which much of astronomy rests. The reason for this
selection is explained below.
A supernova explosion throws into Space 3 its interiors in the form of glowing
debris and gases that, initially, are much brighter than any other star in its home
galaxy. Hence, certain types of supernovae serve in astronomy as the max-cosmic
temperature standard for calibrating distances to far-away galaxies via the
absolute luminosity (brightness) method discussed in CPP Volume I [17].
16
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
17/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
Supernovas extremely bright glow has been studied since 1054, starting from the
Crab Nebula. At its center there is a neutron star spewing energy and
elementary particles into Space 3, from which they proceed to Space 2 and,
eventually, to Space 1.
That end is reached when a threshold amount ofiron is formed in the interiorof a massive star. [CPP, Vol. I]. At that stage all net energy generation inside the
star stops and the process reverses into an endothermic one during which energy
is consumed.
THE COLLAPSE: At this stage the core pressure falls and the doomed star
cannot support the gravity-induced weight of its upper layers. This leads to a
gigantic collapse-implosion of the entire star structure.
A few general-relativistic deterministic options then emerge, depending on the
mass and details of the doomed massive star:
(i) if the mass of the star is about 1.4 times that of the sun, the star slowly decaysinto a white dwarf,
(ii) if its mass is larger, the formation of an extremely packed neutron star or a
black hole is the end result (in which no atomic nuclei structure survives),
(iii) a gigantic supernova explosion follows the collapse-implosion by bouncing
back from a central dense body [neutron star].
Type Ia supernovae harbor consistent brightness (absolute luminosity) because
their progenitor is accreting mass from a nearby star, always imploding into the
central neutron star at exactly the same mass -- the Chandrasekhar Mass Limit.[CPP, Volume I].
The Canada-France-Hawaii TelescopeLegacy Survey Supernova Program is
designed to measure several hundred high-redshifted supernovae.
Massive stars: Due to their high, gravity-induced, inner-core pressures-
temperatures, massive stars are much faster than smaller stars, like the sun, to
exhaust their hydrogen-helium fuel by nuclear fusion.
The resulting higher pressures-temperatures in massive stars cause faster releasesof fusion energy in the interiors of these stars. From there the energy reaches the
outer layers of the star and eventually leaves the star and spreads out in Spaces 3,
2 and, eventually, 1.
6. Black holes are postulated astronomical local objects that are spreadthroughout galaxies and superclusters of galaxies that are wrapped around by
non-expanding SPACE-3, or may exist within Spaces 2 and 1.
17
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
18/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
Black holes come into being by gravity and the expansion of unsaturable
SPACE-1 [the Master Black Sink]. They act as additional unsaturable sinks to
that caused by the expansion of SPACE-1. Like stars and galaxies, black holes
cannot be formed without SPACE-1-expansion.
Astrophysicists expect to detect black holes ranging between roughly the mass of
a few suns to ten billion times greater. Such super-massive ones are postulated to
be in the center of some extremely bright galaxies, including the Milky Way
and quasars.
Black holes are LOCAL, general relativistic cosmological sinks for all matter-
energy arriving and falling into them. They are postulated to be highly
concentrated, local gravity-sinks where the gravity field is so strong that nothing,
not even light, can escape from them. General
relativistic cosmology predicts them as one-way sinks in space-time. Some are
assumed to be in the center of some galaxies. They may be associated with whatis observed and termed quasars.
Within a black hole all atomic and sub-atomic structures had already been
crushed to become only geometrically-curved space-time. This is due to the
extremely strong gravitational field within the black hole. The cause of that total
break down of all structures is only gravity.
Quasars and black holes.
Quasars are assumed to be super massive forms of black holes . Hundreds have
been detected by NASA's Spitzer space telescope, which measures infrared
light, and by Chandra, which measures X-ray emissions. These quasars are in
young (far-away) galaxies that are surrounded by relatively high-density gas that
emits X-rays as it is being sucked into and accelerated towards a one-way sink of
a massive black hole.
18
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
19/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
7. Adiabatic Envelopes and the Origin of Time-Asymmetries and
Irreversibilities in Nature.
An adiabatic wall, or surface, is a physical wall or an imaginary surface
through which no NET energy flow takes place. In Fig. 1.2 we mark only
three points on such imaginary surfaces, namely, where there is No netenergy flow across them. These surfaces wrap around superclusters of
galaxies in 3 dimensions. No net energy flow means that radiation [and matterparticles] somewhat similar to the ones detected within our solar wind do
not cross such adiabatic surfaces.
The maximum temperature attainable in each galaxy is about the same. It is
roughly the same as that generated initially by supernovae and is attributed to:
(i) the maximum temperature in stellar cores during fusion in all active
stars,(ii) The maximum temperature during supernovae explosions.
(iii) The maximum detectable temperatures attainable by at the external
surfaces of quasars or galactic centers that harbor gigantic black holes.
8. The Solar System is composed of our sun, the orbiting planets, moons,asteroids, comets, rocks, gases and dust, all bounded together by the
COMBINED attractive gravitational field of the sun, our galaxy, our local
group of galaxies, our superclusters of galaxies [Fig. 1.3] and the gravitationalfield of all the masses in the rest of the universe.
The sun, like all active stars, is a self-gravitating massive sphere of sub-atomic
particles in a state of hot plasmathat is pressed-heated by the attractive force ofgravity.
It accounts for about 99% of the solar systemtotal mass.
Its diameter is about 1.392 million km and is slightly larger than of an average
star in our Milky Waygalaxy.
About 74% of the suns mass is hydrogen, with about 25% helium.
Gravity-captured debris from previous generations of earlier gas or
stars/supernovae, had started to condense and fall into or orbit the sun, gradually
structuring the currently observed solar planets.
19
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_Wayhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_Wayhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium -
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
20/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
During more than half of its present age, the universe did not harbor our solar
system.
The Solar System extends far beyond the farthest planets, asteroids, comets,
rocks and dust in our community. It is located inside non-expanding Space 3
that wraps our entire galaxy and is spatially interconnected with Spaces 2 and 1.
The Solar Systems outer boundary is where the solar windclashes with other
stars-winds emerging from nearby stars. It may form there a gigantic shock
wavecalledheliosphere.
Our atmosphere comprises the following gravity-induced layers: Homosphere
from sea level to 80km (Troposphere up to about 13km; Ozone layerabout 13-
43km;Stratosphere 13-50km;Mesosphere 50-80km); Thermosphere 80-175 km
(dilute Nitrogen 80-15km, Oxygen 105-128km, Helium 128-150km, Hydrogen150-175km)].
On ATTRIBUTING CURRENT CLIMATE CHANGE to acts of humanity:
1. The monotonic increase in (automatically) measured global temperatures
does not show the 11-YEARS SOLAR CYCLE during which the sun
luminosity changes. These changes are the results of complicated sun-interior
convection currents, granulation, magnetic field lines between changing sunspot
pairs, huge solar flares, etc.
2. Such short-time cycles may correspond to the unexplained Little Ice
Age that chilled Northern Europe during the late 17 th century, suggesting acausal link between solar total luminosity activity and climate change on earth.
3. There have been 17 or 19 ice ages: From about 3,000,000 years ago until
the last one, which gradually ended from about12,000 to 8000 years ago. These
ages have strongly affected ecological systems on earth, and each lasted about
50,000 to 100,000 years and each had lowered the surface of the oceans, resulting
in climate-induced changes in life and all ecological systems.
No Net Suns Energy Remains in Earth: This is the verified result of
complicated thermal cycles in our atmosphere and on earths surface. Theincoming sun energy [Cf, Solar Wind] is partially reflected [and scattered] from
the upper layers of our atmosphere [about 30%] back to non-expanding Space-3,
and, eventually, to expanding SPACE-1.
Most incoming short-wave energy [about 64%] is reflected back to Spaces 3, 2
and eventually absorbed in the ever expanding VOIDS/SPACE-1 as long-wave
20
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
21/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
radiation that results from the suns energy undergoing complex processes in the
earths atmosphere and on the earth surface.
Thus, all incoming suns energy (plus about 6% of heat from the earths interior],
is proceeding further into the depths of Spaces 3, 2 and 1.
RECAP: On its way to SPACE-1, the solar wind engulfs earth and the other
solar planets. No equivalent amount of this incoming radiation energy remains
with earth and the other planets, as many wrongly assume.
Part of it is reflected immediately by our upper atmosphere to outer, cold-dark
spaces 3, 2 and, eventually, to Space-1.
The rest of the solar wind enters our atmosphere, and following complicated
thermal-ecological-hydrological cycles it dissipates irreversibly in outer cold-
dark Space 1.
The outgoing energy includes additional, small amount of energy from the earths
interior.
Together with similar solar winds generated by billions of stars in our galaxy,
this radiation reaches SPACE 1 -- the unsaturable, limitless, universal sinkof
all radiation energies pouring into it from all stellar and galactic sources [12-18].
9. Galactic Centers. The center of our galaxy is called Sagittarius A. It is a
source ofradio wavesthat originate from matterheated to millions of degrees K
as they fall into a super-massive black hole. Galactic centers of other galaxies
may also harbor super massive black holes. These are postulated to be in the
range of hundreds of thousands to tens of billions of the mass of the entire solar
system.
10. Symmetry-Asymmetry & Super symmetries. These subjects are treated in
other Lectures. At this point we only refer to a false primitive symmetry claim
that states:If the universe is eternal into the future it must be eternal into the past, or
prior to creation [the big-bang], there must have been a symmetriccontraction into an all-containing black hole.. As the density had increased
during that pre-creation contraction, gigantic black holes are claimed to be
formed, and, at the instant of maximum contraction, they had switched to
expansion, and only one of them has turned into our expanding universe.
21
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
22/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
Upcoming tests at CERN or by the Planck Satellite or by the ground-based
LIGO and VIRGO observatories, may reveal slight variations in gravitational
radiation that are claimed to be associated with such postulated effects, say, on
the polarization of the cosmic black body radiation.
11. Merging-Colliding Galaxies
The fog shown in these colliding galaxies is composed of millions of stars.
Our galaxy is predicted by some models to collide with the Andromeda galaxy in
about 5 billion years.
The rate of galactic collisions was much higher in the past, mainly because thegalaxies were closer to each other.
Andromedas system consists of Cassiopeia Dwarf, Pegasus dSph, M32, M110,NGC 147, NGC195, AND I-V, etc. The Triangulum Galaxy, the 3rd largest galaxy
in our local group, also includes thePisces Dwarfas a satellite.
Our satellite galaxies consist of theLarge and Small Magellanic Clouds, Ursa
Minor Dwarf, Darco Dwarf, Sculptor Dwarf, Canis Major Dwarf, Fornax
Dwarf, Carina Dwarf, Sextans Dwarf, Tucana Dwarf, Leo I, Leo II, Leo A, Sag
DEG, etc.
22
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
23/37
Many aspects of animals social organization and evolution can be predicted on
the basis of gravity-induced environmental variables.
Since biogeochemical evolution causes key natural resources to be distributed
non-uniformly in the spatial and temporal coordinates of the biosphere, resource
monopolizationdevelops in all levels of socio-biological systems.
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
Lecture2
Socio-Gravitism
Gravity Selection as a key Component of Natural Selection
The first local "aggregates" of matter in the solar system have already contained
atoms and simple molecules, and it was gravity that stratified these compounds in
horizontal layers according to theirspecific gravity.
The atmosphere and geological strata are ordered-selected by the specificgravity of their chemical components. It was gravity that put the early
components of living systems at one and the same strata.
23
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
24/37
Assertion 1
The origin of temporal behavior in
animals can be traced back in time
and out to external physical
influences. Even innate patterns" are
frequently associated with simple
orientation movement in the field of
gravitation, i.e., as "up-ward-
downward" balancing of the
biological body vis--vis the gravity
pointer. Gravity periodicities aroundthe sun emerge as prime sources of
order via time and the arrow of time.
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
Gravity Selection is therefore a key component ofNatural selection.
Gravity is also the universal builder of structures, including all chemistry in the
cores of gravitationally pressed-heated stars [See fusion in Lecture I], geological
strata, earth morphology the entire evolution of life, village/city structures,
transportation systems, linguistic hierarchy, recorded symbols, letters, grammarvs. time, structure of sentences, pages, books, shelves, houses.
1. Gravity-Induced Orientation, Order, Linguistics
Using gravity pointers up, down, left,
right, we generate signs and record
numbers and letters for a later use
and for other to read.
Animals are no exception. Each is'conscious' of the commonly-shared
"up-down" surroundings, and about
"weight" and acceleration. Plants also
harbor innate sensors that guide them
in which direction to grow even on amountain slope.
Additional examples range fromgyroscope inertial changes and gravity-induced changes involving the fluid in
the vertebrate inner ear to a crystallizing suspension of organic spheres in water.
3. Gravity-Induced Plant Growth and Animal Behavior
The sensing devices which plants and animals use for "gravity perception"("gravity receptors", "g-perception", "bio-accelerometers", "gravity-induced
biological clocks", etc.) are not yet well understood, even though a voluminous
24
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
25/37
Assertion 2
Plants know to grow vertically
upward when they start growing in
total darkness as seeds inserted deep
into the ground; -- even when they
grow on a steep mountain slope.
As most high-growing trees they align
their growth under the control of the
gravity vector.
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
literature has been published on this subject. But what we already know justifies
the central role we claim gravity plays in living systems and society.
If a growing higher plant isdisplaced with respect to the
"upright" position, some tens of
minutes later it will adapt its growth
in such a way as to restore its original
orientation in coincidence with the
gravity vector. (If it is displaced only
briefly and then restored to its
original orientation well before the
growth response can set in, it still
responds to that displacement.)
Gravity-induced orientation-adaptation of an organism may occur when an
organism orients itself by a gravity-induced gradient of density differences or
hydrostatic pressure.
Small organisms (including all bacteria) may have no means for sensing gravity,
but they are affected by it.
Animals low on the evolutionary scale characteristically exhibit innate patternsthat depend little on learning, and have a lesser adaptability to changes in the
environment.
Consequently, their dependence on heredity-geophysical-gravitational origins is
high in proportion to animals that are high on the evolutionary scale. While
the latter show some signs of innate patterns, they harbor a greater capacity to
produce a much more flexible mechanism to respond to a variety of other
external changes that stimulate them. The evolutionary origin of the so-called
"innate ideas" may, therefore, be external rather than internal.
4. Gravity-Induced Property, Domains, Wars
25
Assertion 3
When a limited terrestrial space is divided into lots in a community, it carries
economic and social standing, or "lebensraums" involving "well-defined
territories" and "Gravity-inducedNatural Selection"; from animals' mating
systems to animals' monopolies on water resources; from natural food
administration to the control of key strategic ridges; from controlling fossil
fuel resources to disputes over territories.
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
26/37
Assertion 4
Even the computer page is ordered by up,
bottom, left, right margins and footnotes.
And it takes time to read them and to
comprehend them; the time that always
advances from past to future; the time that
we term Linguistic Arrow of Time.
Similarly, gravity-induced ordering of
shelves, files, documents and books in a
library introduces order into our life.
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
Gravity-induced changes developterritoriality in a given spatial region or in agiven assembly of individuals, especially when key resources are not sufficiently
abundant and stable through long periods of historical times.
Inequality in human society begins with land demarcation and property, private
and tribal, stated owned or company run. Envy then drives competition, companyads, TV and academic rating, political candidates, religious rivalry and key
human traits, sometimes stronger than as death.
One species, or one sex, may control a larger quantity of resources, say, scarcewater ponds, than the other, until a small percentage of the population
monopolizes key resources.
We observe this phenomenon in both the animal and human domains of socio-
biology.
In humans these gravity-induced territoriality is often developed into nationality,
strategy and wars.
5. Gravity-Induced Law,
Seconds, Minutes, Days,
Year
Whole cultures, civilizationsand religions have been
26
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
27/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
constructed on gravity-induced human orientability, concepts, spirituality, art,
music, home structure, village structure, wells, canals, boats, trade, agriculture,
and even law enforcement by hanging [17].
History testifies that such gravity-induced cultural phenomena may proceedbeyond grammar and social order far into the spiritual and hierarchical domains:
High priest, low deck, high commissioner, and highness, heaven, lofty, go to the
bottom of the subject, etc.
6. Gravity-Induced Social Standards and Meaning
We train our brain-mind to appreciate gravity-induced, configuration-order-orientation and reject chaos and disorder. In short, we reject what does not wellalign with gravity-induced posture, standing and sitting modes.
Our brain-mind searches for what is 'right' via gravitationally induced
symmetries and asymmetry standards.
Each picture we observe, and each letter-symbol, word and sentence that we read,
or hear, forms in our brain-mind a specific aggregated, configuration-boundary,
-- a gravity-oriented asymmetry.
Each letter-symbol, each word and each sentence generates such an aggregated,configuration-boundary-asymmetry in our brain-mind, where it had been
irreversibly recorded and compared with what had been forced on our brain-mind
by previous forces of our education; -- the STANDARDS at home, school, social
group, tribe, nation, religion or a specific branch of civilization.
Time reversal of musical notes destroys our pleasure. One cannot enjoy it if it is
played in reverse. The structure and modulation of voice and the sentences a
human mind seeks to identify with are similarly affected.
Even a minor deviation from one's pre-trained language, intonation, accent,symmetry and asymmetry -- in face, body and walking way -- destroys our
gravity-induced concepts about what is 'right', young, healthy, and what is not.
27
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
28/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
In observing a person our mind generates a gravitationally induced structuralasymmetry that is compared with the stored standard
Any picture is gravitationally oriented in our brain-mind: up/down or
horizontal/left/right. Thus, inversion of a picture, or reversing the direction of
symbols, words and a meaningful text, destroys the meaning.
We maintain that this process generates gravity-induced form-orientation-
configuration of 'heading', beginning and 'end'.
7. Biological Clocks and Gravitation
The origin of temporal behavior in animals can be traced back in time and out
to external physical influences.
Gravity and geophysical periodicities emerge as prime sources of order and
information in all non-living and living systems.
Animals low on the evolutionary scale depend little on learning, and have a lesser
adaptability to changes in the environment. Consequently, their dependence on
heredity-geophysical-gravitational origins is high in proportion to animals high
on the evolutionary scale.
8. Vertigo, Loss of Coordination-Balancing & Gravity
Vertigo is a loss of coordination, balancing and orientation vis--vis space andthe gravity-induced horizon.
28
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
29/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
Biological structures in the inner ear include semicircular canals and a fluidthat moves, by gravity force, with respect to the gravity vector and activates a
system that transmits linear and rotational motions vis--vis the gravity vector to
the vestibular nerve, which carries these signals through the brainstem to our
brain cerebellum, which, in turn, uses them to control our balancing, orientation,
coordination and movement.
The vestibular system in our ears comprises two semi-circular canals, which are
used to indicate our rotational movements, and otoliths, which indicate linear
translations.
The vestibular system sends signals primarily to the neural structures thatcontrol our eye movements, and to the Cerebellum-muscles system that keeps us
upright and helps maintain clear vision-orientation vs. the gravity vector.
9. Biological Cells, Reproduction, Immunity System & Gravity
Gravity causes changes in cell division, metabolism and the immunitysystem. Reproduction is also impaired and the immune cells cannot differentiate
into mature cells in low or zero gravity conditions attainable in space crafts.
The size of a biological cell depends on the local gravity vector its size
increases in larger local gravitational field-force values.
Bone cells must attach themselves to something and will die if they cannot.
Without the gravity force-field they float around and perish.
When animals evolve on land, outside the oceans, they develop stronger
skeletons to cope with larger gravity forces vis--vis the reduced one due to
buoyancy in the waters.
Earlier lifeforms in the oceans were smaller and had a jellyfish-like
configuration. Thus, without strong skeletons, land animals cannot evolve
10. Animals and Gravity-Induced Effects
29
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
30/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
Gravimorphism, gravitropism and tropism are directional movements of aplant with respect to a directional stimulus. One such tropism is gravimorphism --
the growth or movement of a plant with respect to gravity. Plant roots grow in the
direction of gravity while shoots and stems grow against it.
RECAP:Gravity generates structures and controls all geological layers and global
phenomena ranging from mountain crests, gravity-induced tectonic folds, valleys,
beaches, oceans and lagoons, to springs, wells, swamps, glaciers and rivers, and
the bio-systems connected with them.
Without gravity-induced orientation-order and grammar we are lost in any given
written language. Gravity-induced grammar prevents us from vertical reversals.
Similarly, horizontal reversals prevent us, say, from reversals ofWto M.
There are more complicated gravity-induced grammar rules. They range from
preventing reversal of past into future, and vice versa, to use gravity-induced
structures as reference: A mountain crest, valley, beach line, river bed, sky, earth,
ocean, etc.
Gravity-sensing cells function as detectors of the direction of gravity. The fluid-
particles systems inside cells initiate inner convective currents that cease under
zero gravity. Thus, the absence of gravity affects the contacts of cells via their
membrane potential and their cytoskeletons.
11. Gravity-Induced Village and City Structures
Gravity generates structures andcontrols all geological layers and global
phenomena ranging from mountain
crests, tectonic folds, geological uplifts,
valleys, village and city structures,
transportation systems, oceans and
30
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
31/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
lagoons, to springs, wells, swamps, glaciers and rivers, as well asthe ecological-
systems connected with them.
12. Gravity and Global Warming
Gravity affects global warming and all ecological systems.[Cf. Solar System in Lecture I].
13. Gravity and Health
The evolution and everyday functioning of our bones, legs, hips, joints,
cartilages, ligaments, femurs, tibia, pelvis and muscles, has been "in response" to
the force and direction of gravity.
Gravity plays a key factor in heart failure associated with swollen legs, in flooded
lungs, walking, sleeping needs etc.
Nevertheless, the cardinal role gravity plays in the treatment of gravity-induced
disorders in biological systems, human perception, health and longevity, has been
largely overlooked by health providers and researchers, partly because the key
role of gravity as the universal generator of all socio-gravity-dynamics, has not
yet been well understood and investigated.
References
1. Hubble, Edwin, "A Relation between Distance and Radial Velocity among
Extra-Galactic Nebulae" (1929) Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp. 168-173
31
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=1929PNAS...15..168H&db_key=AST&data_type=HTML&format=&high=42ca922c9c30954http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=1929PNAS...15..168H&db_key=AST&data_type=HTML&format=&high=42ca922c9c30954http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=1929PNAS...15..168H&db_key=AST&data_type=HTML&format=&high=42ca922c9c30954http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=1929PNAS...15..168H&db_key=AST&data_type=HTML&format=&high=42ca922c9c30954 -
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
32/37
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
33/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
12. B. Gal-Or,A Critical Review of the Foundations of Relativistic and Classical
Thermodynamics, Pittsburgh, Pa. April 7-8, (1969), Mono Book, (1970);
13. Ibid. On The Origin of Irreversibility, Science, 176, 11 (1972); 178, 119
(1972);
14. Ibid. Nature 230, 1971); 234, 217 (1971);
15. Ibid. Entropy, Fallacy, and the Origin of Irreversibility: An Essay on the
New Astrophysical Revolutionary School of Thermodynamics. Annal. N.Y.
Acad. Acad. Sci.,196 (A6) 305 (1972) (Gold Medal);
16. Ibid. Cosmological Origin of Irreversibility, Time and Time-Anisotropies- I,
Found. Phys. 6, 407 (1976); 6, 623 (1976); 7, 50 (1977);
17. Ibid. Cosmology, Physics and Philosophy (CPP), Volumes I and II, Springer
Verlag, New York, 1981, 1983, 1987.
18. I. Prigogine, A. C. Eringen, P. Fong and B. Gal-Or, Panel Discussion, pp.
505-507, A Critical Review of of the Foundations of Relativistic and
Classical Thermodynamics, Proceedings, International Symposium, A
Critical Review of the Foundations of Relativistic and Classical
Thermodynamics, Pittsburgh, Pa. April 7-8, 1969, Mono Book, (1970)19. J.A. Wheeler and R. P. Feynman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 157 (1945); 21, 425
(1949)
20. Kroupa, P.; Famaey, B.; de Boer, Klaas S.; Dabringhausen, Joerg;
Pawlowski, Marcel; Boily, Christian; Jerjen, Helmut; Forbes, Duncan et al.
(2010). "Local-Group tests of dark-matter Concordance Cosmology:
Towards a new paradigm for structure formation". Astronomy and
Astrophysics, arXiv:1006.1647.
21. Merritt, D.; Bertone, G. (2005). "DarkMatter Dynamics and Indirect
Detection".Modern Physics Letters A 20: 1021
1036.doi:10.1142/S0217732305017391.
33
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArXivhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1006.1647http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Merritthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1142%2FS0217732305017391http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArXivhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1006.1647http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Merritthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1142%2FS0217732305017391 -
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
34/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
22. Bertone, G; Hooper, D; Silk, J (2005). "Particle darkmatter: evidence,
candidates and constraints".Physics Reports 405:
279.doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2001A.08.031.arXiv:hep-ph/0404175.
23. Freeman, K and G. McNamara,In Search ofDarkMatter. Birkhuser.
p. 37. ISBN0387276165, 2006
24. Salucci, P. and A. Borriello (J. Trampeti and J. Wess. ed.), The Intriguing
Distribution ofDarkMatter in Galaxies. Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin
Springer Verlag. 616. pp. 6677, 2003.
25. Koopmans, L. V. E. and T. Treu, "The Structure and Dynamics of Luminous
and DarkMatter in the Early-Type Lens Galaxy of 0047-281 at z =
0.485". The Astrophysical Journal583: 606
615. doi:10.1086/345423.arXiv:astro-ph/0205281,2003
26. Nature 463, 203-206 (14 January 2010) | doi:10.1038/nature08640,Bulgeless
dwarf galaxies and darkmatter cores from supernova-driven outflows
27. Minchin, R. et al., "A DarkHydrogen Cloud in the Virgo Cluster".The
Astrophysical Journal622: L21L21A. doi:10.1086/429538, 2005
28. Moore, B., et al, "DarkMatter Substructure within Galactic
Halos".Astrophysical Journal Letters, 524: L19L22.doi:10.1086/312287,
1999
29. "Hot News for Cold DarkMatter". Chandra X-ray Observatorycollaboration.
11 June 2003.
30. Massey, R.et al., "Darkmatter maps reveal cosmic
scaffolding".Nature 445 (7125): 286290. doi:10.1038/nature05497.PMID17206154, 2007.
31. Clowe, D., et al, "A direct empirical proof of the existence ofdark
matter".Astrophysical Journal Letters 648: 109
113.doi:10.1086/508162. arXiv:astro-ph/0608407, 2006.
34
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.physrep.2004.08.031http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArXivhttp://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0404175http://books.google.com/?id=C2OS1kmQ8JIC&pg=PA37&dq=%22rotation+curves+of+galaxies+%22+date:2000-2010http://books.google.com/?id=C2OS1kmQ8JIC&pg=PA37&dq=%22rotation+curves+of+galaxies+%22+date:2000-2010http://books.google.com/?id=C2OS1kmQ8JIC&pg=PA37&dq=%22rotation+curves+of+galaxies+%22+date:2000-2010http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Standard_Book_Numberhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0387276165http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003LNP...616...66Shttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003LNP...616...66Shttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003LNP...616...66Shttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003LNP...616...66Shttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...583..606Khttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...583..606Khttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...583..606Khttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...583..606Khttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...583..606Khttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1086%2F345423http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArXivhttp://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0205281http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v463/n7278/full/nature08640.htmlhttp://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v463/n7278/full/nature08640.htmlhttp://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v463/n7278/full/nature08640.htmlhttp://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v463/n7278/full/nature08640.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1086%2F429538http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...524L..19Mhttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...524L..19Mhttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...524L..19Mhttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...524L..19Mhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1086%2F312287http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2003/abell2029/http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2003/abell2029/http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2003/abell2029/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandra_X-ray_Observatoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Masseyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038%2Fnature05497http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PubMed_Identifierhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17206154http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1086%2F508162http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArXivhttp://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0608407http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.physrep.2004.08.031http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArXivhttp://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0404175http://books.google.com/?id=C2OS1kmQ8JIC&pg=PA37&dq=%22rotation+curves+of+galaxies+%22+date:2000-2010http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Standard_Book_Numberhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0387276165http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003LNP...616...66Shttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003LNP...616...66Shttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...583..606Khttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...583..606Khttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...583..606Khttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1086%2F345423http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArXivhttp://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0205281http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v463/n7278/full/nature08640.htmlhttp://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v463/n7278/full/nature08640.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1086%2F429538http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...524L..19Mhttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...524L..19Mhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1086%2F312287http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2003/abell2029/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandra_X-ray_Observatoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Masseyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038%2Fnature05497http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PubMed_Identifierhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17206154http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1086%2F508162http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArXivhttp://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0608407 -
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
35/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
32. Chandra, DarkMatter Mystery Deepens in Cosmic "Train Wreck" :: 16
August 07http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2007/a520/
33. 636. doi:10.1038/nature03597.arXiv:astro-ph/0504097.PMID15931216.
34. Freese, K..Death of Stellar BaryonicDarkMatter Candidates.arXiv:astro-
ph/0007444.
35. Freese, K.Death of Stellar BaryonicDarkMatter. arXiv:astro-ph/0002058.
36. Cline, D. B., "The Search forDarkMatter". Scientific American. 2003
37. Siddhartha G. et al, (ICN-UNAM) [astro-ph/0003105v2] Quintessence-like
Dark Matter in Spiral Galaxies [1]. 2000
38. Vittorio, N.; J. Silk, "Fine-scale anisotropy of the cosmic microwave
background in a universe dominated by cold darkmatter".Astrophysical
Journal, Part 2 Letters to the Editor285: L39L43. doi:10.1086/184361.
1984
39. Umemura, M. and S. Ikeuchi, "Formation of Subgalactic Objects within Two-
Component DarkMatter".Astrophysical Journal299: 583
592. doi:10.1086/163726. 1985
40. Goddard Space Flight Center, "DarkMatter may be Black Hole
Pinpoints".NASA's Imagine the Universe. 2004
41. Bertone, G., "Darkmatter dynamics and indirect detection". Modern Physics
Letters A 20: 10211036.doi:10.1142/S0217732305017391.arXiv:astro-
ph/0504422. 2005
42. Kane, G. and Watson, S., "DarkMatter and LHC: What is the
Connection?". Modern Physics Letters A23: 2103
2123.doi:10.1142/S0217732308028314. 2008
43. Drukier, A., K. Freese, and D. Spergel, "Detecting Cold DarkMatter
Candidates".Physical Review D 33: 3495
3508.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.33.3495. 1986.
35
http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2007/a520/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038%2Fnature03597http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArXivhttp://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0504097http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PubMed_Identifierhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15931216http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArXivhttp://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0007444http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0007444http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArXivhttp://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0002058http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=the-search-for-dark-mattehttp://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=the-search-for-dark-mattehttp://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=the-search-for-dark-mattehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_Americanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0003105v2http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1086%2F184361http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1086%2F163726http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/news/14may04.htmlhttp://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/news/14may04.htmlhttp://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/news/14may04.htmlhttp://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/news/14may04.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1142%2FS0217732305017391http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArXivhttp://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0504422http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0504422http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1142%2FS0217732308028314http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevD.33.3495http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2007/a520/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038%2Fnature03597http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArXivhttp://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0504097http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PubMed_Identifierhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15931216http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArXivhttp://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0007444http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0007444http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArXivhttp://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0002058http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=the-search-for-dark-mattehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_Americanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0003105v2http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1086%2F184361http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1086%2F163726http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/news/14may04.htmlhttp://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/news/14may04.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1142%2FS0217732305017391http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArXivhttp://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0504422http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0504422http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1142%2FS0217732308028314http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevD.33.3495 -
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
36/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
44. Aleksic, A., et al, "MAGIC Gamma-ray Telescope Observation of the
Perseus Cluster of Galaxies: Implications for Cosmic Rays, DarkMatter, and
NGC 1275".Astrophysical Journal710: 634647.doi:10.1088/0004-
637X/710/1/634. 2009
45. Freese, K., "Can Scalar Neutrinos or Massive Dirac Neutrinos be the
Missing Mass?".Physics Letters B167: 295300. doi:10.1016/0370-
2693(86)90349-7. 1986
46. Mandal, S., M. Buckley, K. Freese, D. Spolyar and H. Murayama, "Cascade
Events at IceCube+DeepCore as a Definitive Constraint on the DarkMatter
Interpretation of the PAMELA and Fermi Anomalies".Physical Review D 81:
043508.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.043508. 2010
47. Brownstein, J.R. and J. W. Moffat, "The Bullet Cluster 1E0657-558 evidence
shows modified gravity in the absence ofdarkmatter". Monthly Notices of
the Royal Astronomical Society 382: 2947.doi:10.1111/j.1365-
2966.2007.12275.x.arXiv:astro-ph/0702146. 2007
48. Peebles, J. E., and R. Bharat,"The cosmological constant and dark
energy". Reviews of Modern Physics, 75: 559
606.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.559. 2003
49. Carroll, S. (2001). "The cosmological constant". Living Reviews in
Relativity4: 1.doi:10.1038/nphys815-
-
8/3/2019 Prigogine vs. Gal-Or Debate & Paradoxes Revealed by Gravitism
37/37
All Rights Reserved to Benjamin Gal-Or and M.C. Fernandez
52. Exirifard, Q., "Phenomenological covariant approach to gravity". General
Relativity and Gravitation.doi:10.1007/s10714-010-1073-6. 2010
53. Hossenfelder, S., "A Bi-Metric Theory with Exchange Symmetry".Physical
Review D78: 044015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.044015. 2008
54. Lineweaver, C. and T. M. Davis, "Misconceptions about the Big Bang".
Scientific American. 2005
55. Loeb, A., "The Long-Term Future of Extragalactic Astronomy".Physical
ReviewD65 (4). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.047301. arXiv:astro-ph/0107568.
2002.
56. Faber, S.M. and R.E. Jackson, "Velocity dispersions and mass-to-light ratios
for elliptical galaxies".Astrophysical Journal204: 668
683.doi:10.1086/154215. 1976
57. Rejkuba, M., Dubath, P., Minniti, D. and G. Meylan, (E. Vesperini, M.
Giersz, and A. Sills. ed.),"Masses and M/L Ratios of Bright Globular Clusters
in NGC 5128".Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union. IAU
Symposium246: 418422.doi:10.1017/S1743921308016074, 2008.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10714-010-1073-6http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevD.78.044015http://space.mit.edu/~kcooksey/teaching/AY5/MisconceptionsabouttheBigBang_ScientificAmerican.pdfhttp://space.mit.edu/~kcooksey/teaching/AY5/MisconceptionsabouttheBigBang_ScientificAmerican.pdfhttp://space.mit.edu/~kcooksey/teaching/AY5/MisconceptionsabouttheBigBang_ScientificAmerican.pdfhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevD.65.047301http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArXivhttp://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0107568http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1086%2F154215http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008IAUS..246..418Rhttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008IAUS..246..418Rhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017%2FS1743921308016074http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10714-010-1073-6http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevD.78.044015http://space.mit.edu/~kcooksey/teaching/AY5/MisconceptionsabouttheBigBang_ScientificAmerican.pdfhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevD.65.047301http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArXivhttp://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0107568http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1086%2F154215http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008IAUS..246..418Rhttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008IAUS..246..418Rhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017%2FS1743921308016074