primary research cap220 copy
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Primary research cap220 copy](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081216/587761be1a28ab4e4f8b6df3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Abstract
Primary research was conducted among the students of Grand Valley State
University. The purpose of this was to gain real insight into the thoughts and
perceptions of Grand Valley Students to help Grand Valley Emergency Services. A
focus group and a survey were completed to help find possible solutions for GVES,
and also to provide the client with solid research. Research shows that Grand Valley
students are unaware of Grand Valley Emergency Services, and also mostly have a
negative perception with GVPD, of whom they believe GVES is. Primary research
proved to be helpful in provide answers and ideas for solutions for Grand Valley
Emergency Services.
![Page 2: Primary research cap220 copy](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081216/587761be1a28ab4e4f8b6df3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Methodology
Focus Group
The focus group for the primary research took place on a Wednesday night in
a private room inside the honors college. A moderators guide was created to
organize the information we wished to obtain from the participants. The questions
asked during the focus group ranged from their general knowledge about Grand
Valley Emergency Services to their opinions on several different aspects of GVES.
These included the website, the Rave Guardian App, and Safewalk. The
demographics of the group were two male and three female participants. These
students all came from different majors excluding Advertising and Public Relations.
The focus group results were genuine in the sense that the participants were not
afraid to speak among each other about their opinions. The focus group results are
crucial to the campaign in getting a firsthand look at the information needed for the
primary research. The diversity among the group was very helpful in getting
information that secondary research and a survey could not provide. It was very
telling to see the student’s facial expressions and talking face-‐to-‐face with these
participants. The focus group helped in getting a feel of what would work with the
students and how they really feel about Grand Valley Emergency Services.
Survey
After the focus group was conducted, a survey was created to get answers to
information that was not fully developed or answered during the process of the
focus group. The survey was comprised of ten different questions. These questions
asked about demographics, current knowledge of Grand Valley Emergency Services,
![Page 3: Primary research cap220 copy](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081216/587761be1a28ab4e4f8b6df3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
opinions on services the client offers, and a couple questions regarding where
students spent most of their time while at school. These questions were composed
with focus group results in mind. Anything that did not get answered in the focus
group was created into a question and included in the survey. Through the survey
we were able to obtain valuable information with a quantifiable aspect to it. The
survey results are important in obtaining hard facts from the students. The survey
was sent out via email to students. The majority of respondents for this survey were
Advertising and Public Relations majors, Graphic Design, and Communication
majors, as well as a few others. The majority of respondents were juniors, however,
there were respondents from every class standing. Females were also the majority
within the respondents. This survey was very helpful for the primary research and
to the client because there was a wider range of students that were reached. Instead
of the five members of the focus group, there were 98 respondents that answered
the survey questions. The feedback from the survey was exceptional in the fact that
there were 98 respondents, and also a very low amount of questions that were
skipped within the survey. The focus group proved to be a very helpful part to
getting more information to configure possible solutions for the client.
Results
Focus Group
During the focus group, many different questions were asked. The questions
began with just stating your name, major, and class standing. Participants were also
informed of the ground rules for the focus group. These included making sure the
participants knew that they did not have to answer a question if they felt
![Page 4: Primary research cap220 copy](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081216/587761be1a28ab4e4f8b6df3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
uncomfortable, and they were allowed to leave any time they felt necessary.
Participants were also informed that the information they would provide was very
important, and honesty was crucial in answering these questions. First, the current
perceptions of the Grand Valley Police Department and Emergency Service were
discussed. Participants revealed that they, along with their peers, think that GVPD is
intimidating and they do not have a good overall perception of them. Participants
also shared that they do not really have a current perception on Grand Valley
Emergency Services, nor did they know that it was separate from GVPD. Participants
said that they were more intimidated by the “real police”. During the focus group
participants also shared that they were not very aware of what the Rave Guardian
app was, some even saying they knew nothing about it. Half the group had at least
heard of the App but did not know the specifics of it. Participants said that they
would use it if they believed there was a need for it; however, they feel very safe on
campus. One of the male participants said he would use it if he were a girl. Safe Walk
was more heard of than the other services, but again it was believed to be a service
that was not needed, especially on the Allendale campus. For the most part, there
was a lack of knowledge regarding the service that GVES offers. Another issue
regarding the services was that participants did not know how to use the service.
Specifically, they did not know who to call for Safe Walk. As with the survey,
discussed after this, students felt very safe for the most part on Allendale campus,
but felt significantly less safe on the Pew campus. Next, social media was discussed.
Participants believed that the best way to consume information was through
Facebook and Twitter and also receiving emails about the information. Participants
![Page 5: Primary research cap220 copy](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081216/587761be1a28ab4e4f8b6df3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
revealed that they did not follow any social media accounts affiliated with the
university. Lastly, the website was discussed. Participants said that they had never
been to the website and would not even know where to begin in locating it. When
shown the homepage they said that it was not very attractive or interesting. They
would not have gone searching any further on the page just because of the
homepage. When shown the ‘Do You Know What To Do?’ page students thought that
should be the homepage and is much more inviting and interesting.
Survey
As mentioned previously, there were 98 respondents in the survey that was
distributed via email to students. Also mention earlier was class standing. The
majority of respondents were juniors. The least amount of respondents were
freshman, however, the respondents were relatively equal in regards to class
standing. The gender of respondents was largely female. Over 72% of respondents
who answered were female and only 27% were male. There were two questions in
the survey that asked about how safe students feel on campus. This question was for
the Allendale campus, and a separate question for the Pew campus. The survey
asked on a scale from 1-‐5 how safe they felt, 5 being the safest. Students responded
that they felt very safe on the Allendale campus. 45% of students responded with a 5
on the safety level and 44% responded with a 4 on the safety level. Together this
makes 89% of students who feel very safe or generally safe on the Allendale
campus. For the Pew campus however, results were much different. The majority of
responses were a 3 on the safety scale with 39% of respondents choosing that.
Another 35% of students chose 4. However, the rest of the results varied between 1,
![Page 6: Primary research cap220 copy](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081216/587761be1a28ab4e4f8b6df3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
2, and 5. Students were asked which of the two campuses they spent more time on
and the results were that an astounding 91% of students spent more time on the
Allendale campus. Next, the services GVES offered were asked about. 66% of
students felt that they would use an app that could help them get to their
destination safely while walking. However, over 72% of these students do not know
what the Rave Guardian App is.
Next, students were asked if there was a difference between the Grand Valley Police
Department and Grand Valley Emergency Services. The vast majority of students
responded that they did not know if there was a difference between the two.
![Page 7: Primary research cap220 copy](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081216/587761be1a28ab4e4f8b6df3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The knowledge about services offered from GVES by students was also very
important to determine. A question was formulated to see how much students knew
about the services that Emergency Services offer. The majority answered that they
did not know much or anything about the services offered. Very few respondents
answered that they knew about the services. The last point covered in the survey
was how approachable students felt that campus security is. The results were all
over the board.
![Page 8: Primary research cap220 copy](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081216/587761be1a28ab4e4f8b6df3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The survey results were very informative in the information that we were
looking to find. Results also covered ground that was not covered in the focus group.
Discussion & Analysis
Focus Group
The focus group results were very interesting and important. Students
showed that they do not know much about Grand Valley Emergency Services or the
services they offer. Their responses offered valuable insight into what the first steps
of action should be. The GVES homepage should be redesigned or relocated to show
the ‘Do You Know What To Do?’ page as the homepage, if the client does not desire
any drastic changes. Another issue that needs to be addressed is the lack of
![Page 9: Primary research cap220 copy](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081216/587761be1a28ab4e4f8b6df3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
knowledge about Emergency Services. The department also needs to push their
social media sites. By having separate social media sites that offer information,
students may have a better idea of what the Rave Guardian app is, or who to call
when searching for a Safe Walk. The focus group definitely provided feedback of the
larger issues that are currently happening with the Grand Valley Emergency
Services image.
Survey
The results found gave a lot of information about student’s behaviors and
perceptions. Now knowing the answers to these questions, it can help the client
determine what course of action to take. It was good that students responded from
every class standing to know that there is not any large inconsistency in the
knowledge between classes. Also, the majority of respondents being female may
have been an issue in any other case; however, a lot of GVES services are geared
more toward a female audience. This is very helpful in determining what the female
student body knows about the services offered. Now knowing that students feel
very safe on the Allendale campus may show why the use of the Guardian Rave app
have not been to where GVES wants them to be. With the knowledge of students not
feeling as safe on the Pew campus, perhaps the client can give thought to extending
more services on that campus and heavily promoting them to make students feel
more safe on the downtown campus. On the contrary to this, however, students do
spend far more time on the Allendale campus. This should be taken into
consideration, but should not deter the decision of marketing further services to the
Pew campus since Allendale is in a very rural area, and the Pew campus is in a
![Page 10: Primary research cap220 copy](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081216/587761be1a28ab4e4f8b6df3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
heavily populated urban setting. Also, knowing that 66% of people would use an app
that would allow them to get to their destination safely while walking is a key piece
of information in knowing that students would respond well to marketing the Rave
Guardian app further. More information that goes along with this is the fact that
students do not seem to know about the app at all. If promoted properly, the app has
the potential to gain many more users. A large issue is the fact that students do not
know what Grand Valley Emergency Services is. Not only do they not know what
GVES, they also have a very weak knowledge of the services that are offered through
Emergency Services. This is the first thing that needs to be fixed. Once students are
aware that Grand Valley Emergency Services is a branch off of GVPD, they can start
promoting their services more.
Conclusion
Overall, primary research proved to be very useful in determining the
current knowledge and attitudes that students hold about Emergency Services. This
information will help formulate strategies and tactics to get the client to where it
needs to be with the student community. Through these strategies and tactics, the
hope is that the campaign will start to come together with a plan of how to reach the
students to increase awareness and improve perceptions of Emergency Services.