principal preparation program self-study toolkit for use in … rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · qm...

43
10 th Edition Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in developing, assessing, and improving principal preparation programs Candidate Admissions Clinical Practice Course Content Performance Assessment Pedagogy-Andragogy Graduate Performance Outcomes

Upload: others

Post on 21-Aug-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

10thEdition

Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in developing, assessing, and improving principal preparation programs

• Candidate Admissions • Cl inical Pract ice• Course Content • Performance Assessment• Pedagogy-Andragogy • Graduate Performance Outcomes

Page 2: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

TheWallaceFoundationgenerouslysupportsthiswork.Copyright©2017byEducationDevelopmentCenter,Inc.Allrightsreserved.CoverGraphic:©iStockphoto.comSuggestedcitation:King,C.(2017).QualityMeasures™principalpreparationprogramself-studytoolkit:Foruseindeveloping,assessing,andimprovingprincipalpreparationprograms(10thed.).Waltham,MA:EducationDevelopmentCenter,Inc.CopyrightNotice

ThisdocumentisprotectedbyUnitedStatescopyrightlawandmaynotbereproduced,distributed,transmitted,displayed,orotherwisepublishedwithoutthewrittenpermissionofEducationDevelopmentCenter,Inc.Youmaynotalterorremoveanytrademark,copyrightorothernotice.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 2

Page 3: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

TableofContents

I. Acknowledgments……………………………………………………..………………………….….4

II. IntroductionandOverview…..………..………………………………….……………………...5

III. OperatingTheoryofChange…….……………………………………………………………….7

IV. ProgramDomainsandIndicatorsataGlance…….……………………………………..8

V. SupportingEvidence…………………………………………………………………………………9

VI. Rubrics……………………………………………………………………………………………………11

• CandidateAdmissions………………………………………………………………………12

• CourseContent………………………………………………………………………………...16

• Pedagogy-Andragogy………………………………………………………………………..18

• ClinicalPractice……………..……….………………………………..……………………...20

• PerformanceAssessment………………………………………………………………….24

• GraduatePerformanceOutcomes…..………………………………………………..26

VII. GlossaryofTerms…………………………………………………………………………….…..…28

VIII. SelectedReferences……………………………………………………………………………..…32

© Education Development Center, Inc. 3

Page 4: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

AcknowledgementsThe10theditionofQualityMeasures™representsamilestoneinmorethanadecadeofEDCworkwithschooldistrictsandprincipalpreparationprogramsacrossthecountry,workingtoprepareprincipalstoleadchronicallylowperformingschools,withanendgoalofimprovingstudentachievement.SubstantialchangesinQMcontent,format,andmethodsarereflectedinthiseditionandareindirectresponsetofeedbackfromusersaswellasinsightsgleanedfromourownobservationsofuserimplementation,overthecourseofthepasttwoyearswithadiversepoolofprogramsandschooldistricts.ItiswithsincereappreciationthatweextendourthankstoTheWallaceFoundationwhosegenerousfundingsupportedtheproductionofthis10theditionofQMaspartofthelaunchoftheUniversityPrincipalPreparationInitiative(UPPI)inthefallof2016.Programfacultyfrom:AlbanyStateUniversity,VirginiaStateUniversity,FloridaAtlanticUniversity,SanDiegoStateUniversity,UniversityofConnecticut,WesternKentuckyUniversity,andNorthCarolinaStateUniversityengagedtheirself-studyteamsinthecollectionofbaselineprogramdatausingQualityMeasures™toolsandprotocolsinpartnershipwithaffiliatedschooldistrictstaff.Wewouldalsoliketoacknowledgesurveyfeedbackreceivedfromnewpreparationprogramsthatconductedself-studiesinpartnershipwiththeiraffiliatedschooldistrictsasaninitialstepintheirpartnercollaborationeffortstoimprovetrainingoutcomesforprogramgraduates.MembersoftheNationalTrainingProvider-PrincipalGraduateProfessionalLearningCommunity(TPPGPLC)wereanotherimportantcontributingsourcetothiseditionoftheQualityMeasures™toolkit.Contributionsincluded,butwerenotlimitedto,carefulreviewandfeedbackonProfessionalStandardsforEducationalLeaders(PSEL,2015)aspartofa2016PLCsessioninMassachusetts.AdditionalcontributorsincludedmembersofthefirsttrainingcohortofQMFacilitatorswhoco-facilitatedself-studieswithPPIscale-outprogramsaspartoftheirtraining,andprovidedfeedbackandsuggestionsforimprovingtoolsandprocesses.Finally,itiswithheartfeltgratitudethatIacknowledgeMelissaLin.Hercountlesshoursoftooleditingandformatting,self-studymeetingcoordinationandscheduling,informationandmaterialsmanagement,andexemplarcataloguedesignandpopulationhavesupportedtheevolutionofQualityMeasures™since2009.HertalentedsupporthasbeenaconsistentsourceofbothinspirationandaspirationtoQMusers,trainers,facilitators,anddevelopers.CherylL.King,QMPrincipalInvestigatorEducationDevelopmentCenter,Inc.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 4

Page 5: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

IntroductionandOverviewEducationDevelopmentCenter,Inc.,fundedbyTheWallaceFoundation,ispleasedtointroducethe10theditionofQualityMeasures™evidence-basedtoolsandprotocols.TheQMtoolkitisintentionallydesignedtobeaself-led,analytic,andtopic-specificresourceforuseinthecriticalself-examination,reflection,andpeerreviewofprincipalpreparationprogrameffectiveness.HighlightsandNewResourcesThe10theditionoftheQMtoolkitreflectsseveralimportantchangesthatrespondtonewresearchfindings,performancestandardsforeducationleaders,andfeedbackfromQMprogramandschooldistrictusers.Amongthemorenoticeablechangesisareturn(bypopulardemand)toarubricformatanddevelopmentallevelcontinuum.Alsoincorporated,aspartofthe10thedition,ismoredetailedguidanceonassemblingsupportingevidencethatincludes:typesofevidence,descriptionsforeachtype,andillustrativeexamplesbydomainandlevelofevidencestrength.Inadditiontothesechanges,thiseditionofthetoolincludes:selectedreferencesthatareorganizedbydomain,theQMtheoryofchange,andan“ataglance”lookatQMdomainsandindicators.ResearchBaseandPerformanceStandardsQMrubricindicatorsandcriteriadescribethecharacteristicsassociatedwitheffectivepracticesfromtheliteratureandempiricalresearchonadulttransformationalpedagogy.Inaddition,indicatorsandcriteriatightlylinkedtoProfessionalStandardsforEducationalLeaders(PSEL). RubricOrganizationandRatingContinuumThisQualityMeasures™toolkitincludesarubricforeachofthefollowingprogramdomains:1)candidateadmissions,2)coursecontent,3)pedagogy-andragogy,4)clinicalpractice,5)performanceassessment,and6)graduateperformanceoutcomes.Eachdomainidentifiesspecificindicatorsofeffectivepracticeandcriteria.Rubricsprovideadetaileddescriptionofindicatorsandperformancecriteriaforeachprogramdomain.Afour-levelperformancecontinuumallowsteamstoexaminetheirprogrampracticesagainstindicatorcriteriaateachlevelofthecontinuumtodeterminethedegreetowhichtheirprogrammeetsthestatedcriteriaforaparticularlevel.Evidence-BasedProtocolQMusesaninteractivefacilitatedprocesstocompletetheprogramself-study.Self-studyteamsaretypicallycomprisedofprogramfaculty,affiliatedschooldistrictrepresentatives,andotherprogramstakeholders.Beginningwithafacilitatedorientationsession,theself-studytypicallyconsistsoffourparts:1)ageneralinformationsessionthatintroducesQualityMeasures™toanaudienceofpotentialusers;2)an

© Education Development Center, Inc. 5

Page 6: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

orientationsessionforteams,interestedincompletingaprogramself-study,tobuildasharedunderstandingofQMdomains,indicatorsofeffectiveness,criteria,andtobrainstormexamplesofevidenceofeffectivepractices;3)thepresentationofevidenceandself-scoringsessionthatistypicallyheldwhenteamshavecompletedpreliminaryself-ratingsforeachprogramdomainandassembledsupportingevidence,andfollowingthepresentationofevidenceforeachdomain,theteammakesfinaldeterminationsaboutratinglevels;and4)thefourthsessionthatincludesapresentationoffindingsandrecommendationsforteamconsiderationonwheretofocusinterventionefforts.Thefourpartsofaneffectiveself-studyprocessaretypicallyscheduledasfollows:• Thegeneralinformationsessionistypicallyaone-hoursessiondesignedforprograms,districts,andpolicymakersinterestedinlearning

moreabouttheQMself-studyprocessasawaytosupportcontinuousimprovementactivities.Thissessionisoftenconductedvirtuallyinordertoaccommodatelargeraudiencesofpotentialuserswhomaybelocatedindifferentlocations.

• Theorientationsessionisusuallya2-to3-hourmeetingthatisintendedforprograms,districts,andpolicymakerswhohavedecidedtoparticipateintheQMself-studyprocess,andhaveassembledaself-studyteamtoleadtheprocess.ThesessionisdesignedtofamiliarizeteamswithQMtoolsandprotocols,indicatorsandratingcriteria,andtheprocessforassemblingevidenceandcompletingpreliminaryratings.Teamsalsousethistimetofinalizeplansfortheevidencereviewandfinalratingsession.

• Theevidencereviewandratingsessionisoftendividedintomorethanonesittinginordertoallowadequatetimeforteamstoreviewevidenceandrateeachdomain(suggestaminimumof1-2hoursforeachdomain).Forexample,teamsmaychoosetoreviewallsixdomainsinoneday,ordividethereviewintotwohalf-daysessionsandreviewthreedomainsonone½dayandthreeonanother½day.

• Thereportoffindingsandimprovementplanningsessionismosteffectiveifagendasareplannedtoallowtimeforadiscussionoffindings,targetingareasforintervention,andconductingsomepreliminaryplanningfornextsteps.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 6

Page 7: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

OperatingTheoryofChange

OUTCOMES

HIGHLYEFFECTIVEPRINCIPALS

HighlyEffectiveTeachers

HighPerformingStudents

PrincipalPreparationPrograms

3.ActiveLearning

Experiences

6.Graduate

PerformanceOutcomes

4.Clinical

PracticeinReal

Schools5.

Performance-Based

Assessments

1.Selectingthe"Right"Candidates

2.Standards-BasedCourseContent

ProfessionalStandardsforEducationLeadersStandard1.

Mission,Vision,andCoreValuesEffectiveeducationalleadersdevelop,advocate,andenactasharedmission,vision,andcorevaluesofhigh-qualityeducationandacademicsuccessandwellbeingofeachstudent.

Standard2.EthicsandProfessionalNormsEffectiveeducationalleadersactethicallyandaccordingtoprofessionalnormstopromoteeachstudent’sacademicsuccessandwellbeing.

Standard3.EquityandCulturalResponsivenessEffectiveeducationalleadersstriveforequityofeducationalopportunityandculturallyresponsivepracticestopromoteeachstudent’sacademicsuccessandwellbeing.

Standard4.Curriculum,Instruction,andAssessmentEffectiveeducationalleadersdevelopandsupportintellectuallyrigorousandcoherentsystemsofcurriculum,instruction,andassessmenttopromoteeachstudent’sacademicsuccessandwellbeing.

Standard5.CommunityofCareandSupportforStudents.Effectiveeducationalleaderscultivateaninclusive,caring,andsupportiveschoolcommunitythatpromotestheacademicsuccessandwellbeingofeachstudent.

Standard6.ProfessionalCapacityofSchoolPersonnelEffectiveeducationalleadersdeveloptheprofessionalcapacityandpracticeofschoolpersonneltopromoteeachstudent’sacademicsuccessandwellbeing.

Standard7.ProfessionalCommunityforTeachersandStaffEffectiveeducationalleadersfosteraprofessionalcommunityofteachersandotherprofessionalstafftopromoteeachstudent’sacademicsuccessandwellbeing.

Standard8.MeaningfulEngagementofFamiliesandCommunityEffectiveeducationalleadersengagefamiliesandthecommunityinmeaningful,reciprocal,andmutuallybeneficialwaystopromoteeachstudent’sacademicsuccessandwellbeing.

Standard9.OperationsandManagementEffectiveeducationalleadersmanageschooloperationsandresourcestopromoteeachstudent’sacademicsuccessandwellbeing.

Standard10.SchoolImprovementEffectiveeducationalleadersactasagentsofcontinuousimprovementtopromoteeachstudent’sacademicsuccessandwellbeing.

OUTPUTSINPUTS

© Education Development Center, Inc. 7

Page 8: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

ProgramDomainsandIndicatorsataGlance

1. Standards2. LearningGoals3. CourseDesign4. CourseEvaluation5. CourseCoherence

1. ActiveLearningStrategies2. ExperientialLearning

Activities3. ReflectivePractices4. FormativeFeedback5. PerformanceBenchmarking6. CulturallyResponsive

Pedagogy

1. ClinicalDesign2. ClinicalQuality3. ClinicalCoaching4. ClinicalSupervision5. ClinicalPlacements6. ClinicalEvaluation

CLINICALPRACTICE

1. AssessmentPurpose2. CandidatePerformance

Targets3. AssessmentQuality4. AssessmentMethods5. Communicationof

AssessmentResults6. AssessmentImpact

PERFORMANCEASSESSMENT

1. MarketingStrategy2. RecruitmentPractices3. AdmissionStandards4. ApplicantScreening5. PredictorAssessments6. CandidateSelection

CANDIDATEADMISSIONS PEDAGOGY-ANDRAGOGYCOURSECONTENT

GRADUATEOUTCOMES

1. ExitCompetencies2. StateCertification3. SchoolDistrictEligibility4. SchoolDistrictHiring5. JobPlacementand

Retention6. JobPerformance

© Education Development Center, Inc. 8

Page 9: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

SupportingEvidenceTheQMself-studyprocessusesanevidence-basedprotocolthatasksteamstoprovideproofthatprogramsmeettheindicatorcriteriaforaparticularlevelontheratingcontinuum.Forthesepurposes,sixtypesofevidencearedescribedinthetablebelow:numerical,documents,demonstrational,observational,inferential,andanecdotal.Numericaldata,demonstratingdegreeofimplementation,isconsideredtobethestrongestproofofeffectiveness.Documents,demonstrations,andobservations,thoughstrongformsofevidence,involvesomedegreeofinferenceandsubjectivityandaregenerallyratedaslevel3.Inferentialandanecdotaldataareconsideredtobeinconclusivetypesofevidenceandareratedaslevel2andlevel1,respectively.Thefollowingtableisprovidedtoassistwithassemblingandclassifyingsupportingevidencefordiscussionandratingpurposes.Itdisplayssixtypesofsupportingevidence,andincludesashortdescriptionforeachtype.Finally,illustrativeexamplesforeachtypeandlevelofevidenceareprovidedbyprogramdomainandareincludedforreferencepurposes.

EvidenceType Strength Description QMDomain(Example) IllustrativeExamplesofEvidence

Numericaldata Level4Quantitativedatathatusesnumbers(orstatistics)tosupportaposition.Thistypeofevidenceisbasedontrackingsystemdata,surveyorpolls.

o CandidateAdmissions

o Longitudinalapplicantdatareportso Longitudinaladmissionsdatao Studentsurveydatao Predictorassessmentdata

Documents Level3Writtenformsofproofsuchasdocuments,catalogs,textbooks,other.Canalsoincludeothertypesofmedia,suchasimages,videooraudiorecordings,etc.

o CourseContento Coursesyllabio Programscopeandsequenceo Standardsalignmentmatrices

Demonstrations Level3 Anobjectordocumentisconsideredtobedemonstrationevidencewhenitdirectlydemonstratesfact/indicatorcriteria. o Pedagogy o Instructionalvideosusedtodemonstrate

ormodelaspecificpractice

Observations

Level3 Recordofsomethingactuallyseenandrecorded–involvessomeinference;documentedbyobserver. o Assessment o Fieldobservationnotes

o Videorecordingsofclinicalobservations

Inferentialdata Level2 Evidencepresentedimplies/concludesthatacertainconditionexists,basedoninconclusivedata. o ClinicalPractice o Fieldobservationnotes

o RecordedclinicalindividualobservationAnecdotaldata Level1 Evidenceisprimarilybasedonhearsay;unreliable,subjective,

questionable. o GraduateOutcomes o Lettersofreferencefromfieldsupervisor

© Education Development Center, Inc. 9

Page 10: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

© Education Development Center, Inc. 10

Page 11: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

QMRubrics

© Education Development Center, Inc. 11

Page 12: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Whilecandidaterecruitmentisavitalcomponentleadingtothesuccessofaschool,researchshowsthatlessthanhalfofallhighereducationinstitutionshaveaclearstrategythatguidesthedevelopmentoftheirrecruitmentefforts.1Whileinstitutionsarerelyingmoreonsocialmediaanddigitalpresencetodefinetheirbrandandattractstudents,mostpopulararethetraditionalformsofoutreachthatareevent-drivenandinvolvedirectinteractionwithprospectivestudents.2Amoreselective,probingprocessforselectingcandidatesfortrainingisthoughttobeanessentialfirststepincreatingamorecapableanddiversecorpsoffutureprincipals.3Effectiveprogramsprobetodetermineifapplicantshavetheneededexperience,leadershipskills,aptitudesanddispositionstoachievedistrictgoalsandimproveinstructionundertryingconditions.4Meta-analysesofpsychologyresearchstudiessuggeststhatthebestwaytoforecastleadershipistouseacombinationofcognitiveability,personality,simulation,role-play,andmulti-raterassessmentinstrumentsandtechniques.5Bray(1982)reportedthattheseassessmentdatawerereasonablyvalidpredictorsofaperson’spromotionrecord.6,7

QMIndicatorsofEffectiveCandidateAdmissions:1. MarketingStrategy2. RecruitmentPractices3. AdmissionsStandards4. ApplicantScreening5. PredictorAssessments6. CandidateSelection

1Frolich,N.,&Stensaker,B.(2010).Studentrecruitmentstrategiesinhighereducation:promotingexcellenceanddiversity?InternationalJournalofEducationalManagement,24(4),359-370.2NoelLevitz,R.(2016).Marketingandstudentrecruitmentpracticesbenchmarkreportforfour-yearcollegesanduniversities.CedarRapids,IA:RuffaloNoelLevitz.Retrievedfromwww.RuffaloNL.com/BenchmarkReports 3Mitgang,L.(2012).Themakingoftheprincipal:Fivelessonsinleadershiptraining.WallacePerspectiveSeries.NewYork:TheWallaceFoundation.4Ibid.,55Hogan,R.,Curphy,G.J.,&Hogan,J.(1994).Whatweknowaboutleadership:Effectivenessandpersonality.AmericanPsychologist,49(6),493-504.6Howard,A.(1986).Collegeexperiencesandmanagerialperformance.JournalofAppliedPsychology,71(3),530-552.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.530 7Bray,D.W.,&Howard,A.(1983).TheAT&Tlongitudinalstudiesofmanagers.InK.W.Schaie(Ed.),Longitudinalstudiesofadultpsychologicaldevelopment(pp.112-146).NewYork:Guilford.

Domain1:CandidateAdmissions

© Education Development Center, Inc. 12

Page 13: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Domain1:CandidateAdmissions

QMIndicators Level4 Level3 Level2 Level1

1 MarketingStrategy

AcomprehensivemarketingstrategyisbasedonALLofthefollowingdata:1)anin-depthanalysisofthecurrentandfuturemarketforschoolprincipalsintheregion;2)anassessmentofprogramstrengthsandweaknesses;3)theidentificationofmarketopportunitiesandthreatsthatwillpositivelyornegativelyimpacteffortstoattractthebest,brightest,andmostdiversetalenttoapplyforadmissiontoyourprogram.

AcomprehensivemarketingstrategyisbasedonMOSTofthefollowingdata:1)anin-depthanalysisofthecurrentandfuturemarketforschoolprincipalsintheregion;2)anassessmentofprogramstrengthsandweaknesses;3)theidentificationofmarketopportunitiesandthreatsthatwillpositivelyornegativelyimpacteffortstoattractthebest,brightest,andmostdiversetalenttoapplyforadmissiontoyourprogram.

AcomprehensivemarketingstrategyisbasedonSOMEofthefollowingdata:1)anin-depthanalysisofthecurrentandfuturemarketforschoolprincipalsintheregion;2)anassessmentofprogramstrengthsandweaknesses;3)theidentificationofmarketopportunitiesandthreatsthatwillpositivelyornegativelyimpacteffortstoattractthebest,brightest,andmostdiversetalenttoapplyforadmissiontoyourprogram.

AcomprehensivemarketingstrategyisbasedonFEW/NONEofthefollowingdata:1)anin-depthanalysisofthecurrentandfuturemarketforschoolprincipalsintheregion;2)anassessmentofprogramstrengthsandweaknesses;3)theidentificationofmarketopportunitiesandthreatsthatwillpositivelyornegativelyimpacteffortstoattractthebest,brightest,andmostdiversetalenttoapplyforadmissiontoyourprogram.

2 RecruitmentPractices

ALLrecruitmentpracticesarepartofastrategicplanthatbuildsonprogramstrengthsandopportunitiesidentifiedinthemarketanalyses.Practicesaredesignedtoattractapplicantswhohavethemaximumpotentialforbecomingeffectiveschoolleadersandinclude:strategicsocialmedia,adigitalpresence(websitewithanalytics),andevent-basedoutreachthatinvolvesdirectinteractionwithprospectivestudents.Employstrategiestoexpandtheethnicandgenderdiversityofcandidatepools.

MOSTrecruitmentpracticesarepartofastrategicplanthatbuildsonprogramstrengthsandopportunitiesidentifiedinthemarketanalyses.Practicesaredesignedtoattractapplicantswhohavethemaximumpotentialforbecomingeffectiveschoolleadersandinclude:strategicsocialmedia,adigitalpresence(websitewithanalytics),andevent-basedoutreachthatinvolvesdirectinteractionwithprospectivestudents.Employstrategiestoexpandtheethnicandgenderdiversityofcandidatepools.

SOMErecruitmentpracticesarepartofastrategicplanthatbuildsonprogramstrengthsandopportunitiesidentifiedinthemarketanalyses.Practicesaredesignedtoattractapplicantswhohavethemaximumpotentialforbecomingeffectiveschoolleadersandinclude:strategicsocialmedia,adigitalpresence(websitewithanalytics),andevent-basedoutreachthatinvolvesdirectinteractionwithprospectivestudents.Employstrategiestoexpandtheethnicandgenderdiversityofcandidatepools.

FEW/NOrecruitmentpracticesarepartofastrategicplanthatbuildsonprogramstrengthsandopportunitiesidentifiedinthemarketanalyses.Practicesaredesignedtoattractapplicantswhohavethemaximumpotentialforbecomingeffectiveschoolleadersandinclude:strategicsocialmedia,adigitalpresence(websitewithanalytics),andevent-basedoutreachthatinvolvesdirectinteractionwithprospectivestudents.Employstrategiestoexpandtheethnicandgenderdiversityofcandidatepools.

3 AdmissionStandards

AdmissionstandardsfortheprogramincludearequirementthatALLapplicantsprovidedocumentedevidenceofpriorexperiencetheyhaveinleadingchange,fosteringcollaboration,andcontributingtotheprofessionalgrowthanddevelopmentofothersforuseinconsideringtheirapplication.

AdmissionstandardsfortheprogramincludearequirementthatMOSTapplicantsprovidedocumentedevidenceofpriorexperiencetheyhaveinleadingchange,fosteringcollaboration,andcontributingtotheprofessionalgrowthanddevelopmentofothersforuseinconsideringtheirapplication.

AdmissionstandardsfortheprogramincludearequirementthatSOMEapplicantsprovidedocumentedevidenceofpriorexperiencetheyhaveinleadingchange,fosteringcollaboration,andcontributingtotheprofessionalgrowthanddevelopmentofothersforuseinconsideringtheirapplication.

AdmissionstandardsfortheprogramincludearequirementthatFEW/NOapplicantsprovidedocumentedevidenceofpriorexperiencetheyhaveinleadingchange,fosteringcollaboration,andcontributingtotheprofessionalgrowthanddevelopmentofothersforuseinconsideringtheirapplication.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 13

Page 14: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Domain1:CandidateAdmissionsQMIndicators Level4 Level3 Level2 Level1

4 ApplicantScreening

ALLapplicationsarescreenedtoensurethatapplicantsmeetadmissionstandardsincludingevidenceofpriorexperienceleadingchange,fosteringcollaboration,andsupportingthegrowthanddevelopmentofprofessionalstaff.

MOSTapplicationsarescreenedtoensurethatapplicantsmeetadmissionstandardsincludingevidenceofpriorexperienceleadingchange,fosteringcollaboration,andsupportingthegrowthanddevelopmentofprofessionalstaff.

SOMEapplicationsarescreenedtoensurethatapplicantsmeetadmissionstandardsincludingevidenceofpriorexperienceleadingchange,fosteringcollaboration,andsupportingthegrowthanddevelopmentofprofessionalstaff.

FEW/NOapplicationsarescreenedtoensurethatapplicantsmeetadmissionstandardsincludingevidenceofpriorexperienceleadingchange,fosteringcollaboration,andsupportingthegrowthanddevelopmentofprofessionalstaff.

5 PredictorAssessments

ALLscreenedapplicantsparticipateinacombinationofcognitiveability,personality,simulation,role-play,andmulti-raterassessmentinstrumentsandtechniquesasthefinalstepintheapplicantscreeningprocess.

MOSTscreenedapplicantsparticipateinacombinationofcognitiveability,personality,simulation,role-play,andmulti-raterassessmentinstrumentsandtechniquesasthefinalstepintheapplicantscreeningprocess.

SOMEscreenedapplicantsparticipateinacombinationofcognitiveability,personality,simulation,role-play,andmulti-raterassessmentinstrumentsandtechniquesasthefinalstepintheapplicantscreeningprocess.

FEW/NOscreenedapplicantsparticipateinacombinationofcognitiveability,personality,simulation,role-play,andmulti-raterassessmentinstrumentsandtechniquesasthefinalstepintheapplicantscreeningprocess.

6 CandidateSelection

CandidatefinalselectionprocessesincludeaformalinterviewofALLfinalistsbyacommitteecomprisedofprogramfacultyandschooldistrictstafftoconfirmthatapplicantsare:1)genuinelymotivatedtoleadachronicallylow-performingschool,2)likelytosuccessfullycompleteprogramrequirements,and3)areviewedaspotentialhiresbytheschooldistrict.

CandidatefinalselectionprocessesincludeaformalinterviewofMOSTfinalistsbyacommitteecomprisedofprogramfacultyandschooldistrictstafftoconfirmthatapplicantsare:1)genuinelymotivatedtoleadachronicallylow-performingschool,2)likelytosuccessfullycompleteprogramrequirements,and3)areviewedaspotentialhiresbytheschooldistrict.

CandidatefinalselectionprocessesincludeaformalinterviewofSOMEfinalistsbyacommitteecomprisedofprogramfacultyandschooldistrictstafftoconfirmthatapplicantsare:1)genuinelymotivatedtoleadachronicallylow-performingschool,2)likelytosuccessfullycompleteprogramrequirements,and3)areviewedaspotentialhiresbytheschooldistrict.

CandidatefinalselectionprocessesincludeaformalinterviewofFEW/NOfinalistsbyacommitteecomprisedofprogramfacultyandschooldistrictstafftoconfirmthatapplicantsare:1)genuinelymotivatedtoleadachronicallylow-performingschool,2)likelytosuccessfullycompleteprogramrequirements,and3)areviewedaspotentialhiresbytheschooldistrict.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 14

Page 15: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

© Education Development Center, Inc. 15

Page 16: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Themostimportantdevelopmentinuniversityteachingoverthepastfewyearshasbeentheshiftfromteachingseenasanindividualresponsibilitytoonethattheinstitutionshouldassumeinmattersofassessmentpractice,overallteachingdesign,inaccordancewiththescholarshipofteachingandlearning.Recentinstitutionalconcernforbenchmarking,definingoutcomes,andthestatementsofgraduateattributes,providesanoutcomes-basedframeworkintowhichoutcomes-basedmodelsofteachingandassessmentreadilyfit.McMahonandThakore(2006),inacomprehensivereviewofhigherorderthinkingandcriticalthinkinginconstructivelyalignedcoursesatUniversityCollegeDublin,foundthatconstructivealignment(CA)ledto:greaterstandardizationleadingtofairerandmorereliableassessment;greatertransparencyleadingto(a)easierandmoreaccurateinter-universityandinternationalcomparisons,(b)studentsbeingabletofocusmoreeffectivelyonthekeylearninggoals;moreeffectiveevaluationofbothmodulesandcourses–giventheoutcomes,anevaluatorcanestimatehowwellteachingandlearningstrategies,content,materials,otherresourcesandassessmentproceduresactuallysupportstudentsinachievingthem;greatercoherenceinprogramsoflearning;andanincreaseinthecriticalityanddepthofstudentwork.

QMIndicatorsofEffectiveCourseContent:1. Standards2. LearningGoals3. CourseDesign4. CourseEvaluation5. CourseCoherence

Domain2:CourseContent

© Education Development Center, Inc. 16

Page 17: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Domain2:CourseContent

QMIndicators Level4 Level3 Level2 Level1

1 Standards

ALLcoursesarebasedonleaderperformancestandardsanddesignedtodevelopleadercompetenciestoinclude:1)agencyforchange;2)parent-community-schoolpartnerships;3)professionalcapacitybuilding;4)studentcenteredlearning;5)instructionalguidanceandsupport;6)culturallyresponsiveteachingandlearning.

MOSTcoursesarebasedonleaderperformancestandardsanddesignedtodevelopleadercompetenciestoinclude:1)agencyforchange;2)parent-community-schoolpartnerships;3)professionalcapacitybuilding;4)studentcenteredlearning;5)instructionalguidanceandsupport;6)culturallyresponsiveteachingandlearning.

SOMEcoursesarebasedonleaderperformancestandardsanddesignedtodevelopleadercompetenciestoinclude:1)agencyforchange;2)parent-community-schoolpartnerships;3)professionalcapacitybuilding;4)studentcenteredlearning;5)instructionalguidanceandsupport;6)culturallyresponsiveteachingandlearning.

FEW/NOcoursesarebasedonleaderperformancestandardsanddesignedtodevelopleadercompetenciestoinclude:1)agencyforchange;2)parent-community-schoolpartnerships;3)professionalcapacitybuilding;4)studentcenteredlearning;5)instructionalguidanceandsupport;6)culturallyresponsiveteachingandlearning.

2 LearningGoals

ALLcoursesarticulateclearlearninggoalsforcandidatesthatidentifyboththeleaderbehaviortobedevelopedandthecontextwithinwhichthebehaviorwillbeperformed.

MOSTcoursesarticulateclearlearninggoalsforcandidatesthatidentifyboththeleaderbehaviortobedevelopedandthecontextwithinwhichthebehaviorwillbeperformed.

SOMEcoursesarticulateclearlearninggoalsforcandidatesthatidentifyboththeleaderbehaviortobedevelopedandthecontextwithinwhichthebehaviorwillbeperformed.

FEW/NOcoursesarticulateclearlearninggoalsforcandidatesthatidentifyboththeleaderbehaviortobedevelopedandthecontextwithinwhichthebehaviorwillbeperformed.

3 CourseDesignALLcoursedesignsexplicitlyconnectcoursecontent,learningactivities,resourcesandmaterials,andcourseassessmentmeasures.

MOSTcoursedesignsexplicitlyconnectcoursecontent,learningactivities,resourcesandmaterials,andcourseassessmentmeasures.

SOMEcoursedesignsexplicitlyconnectcoursecontent,learningactivities,resourcesandmaterials,andcourseassessmentmeasures.

FEW/NOcoursedesignsexplicitlyconnectcoursecontent,learningactivities,resourcesandmaterials,andcourseassessmentmeasures.

4 CourseEvaluation

ALLcourseevaluationsareauditedonaregularscheduletoensurethatassessmenttasksandcriteriaclearlyanddirectlyrelatetointendedlearningoutcomes.

MOSTcourseevaluationsareauditedonaregularscheduletoensurethatassessmenttasksandcriteriaclearlyanddirectlyrelatetointendedlearningoutcomes.

SOMEcourseevaluationsareauditedonaregularscheduletoensurethatassessmenttasksandcriteriaclearlyanddirectlyrelatetointendedlearningoutcomes.

FEW/NOcourseevaluationsareauditedonaregularscheduletoensurethatassessmenttasksandcriteriaclearlyanddirectlyrelatetointendedlearningoutcomes.

5 CourseCoherence

ALLcoursesareorganizedandlogicallysequencedtoensurethat:concepts,knowledge,andskillsbuilduponeachotherinstructuredprogressionoflearning,andlearninginonecoursemirrorslearninginthesamecoursetaughtbyadifferentinstructorincludingmethodsusedtoevaluatelearning.

MOSTcoursesareorganizedandlogicallysequencedtoensurethat:concepts,knowledge,andskillsbuilduponeachotherinstructuredprogressionoflearning,andlearninginonecoursemirrorslearninginthesamecoursetaughtbyadifferentinstructorincludingmethodsusedtoevaluatelearning.

SOMEcoursesareorganizedandlogicallysequencedtoensurethat:concepts,knowledge,andskillsbuilduponeachotherinstructuredprogressionoflearning,andlearninginonecoursemirrorslearninginthesamecoursetaughtbyadifferentinstructorincludingmethodsusedtoevaluatelearning.

FEW/NOcoursesareorganizedandlogicallysequencedtoensurethat:concepts,knowledge,andskillsbuilduponeachotherinstructuredprogressionoflearning,andlearninginonecoursemirrorslearninginthesamecoursetaughtbyadifferentinstructorincludingmethodsusedtoevaluatelearning.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 17

Page 18: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Keyindicatorsofeffectivepedagogy/andragogyemergefromreviewsofempiricalstudiesontransformativelearningandarerootedindeeplyheldassumptionsaboutthenatureofadultlearningandpurposesofteachingforchange.Whentakentogether,theyseektoestablishareciprocalrelationshipbetweenthepracticesandthetheoreticalorientationoftransformativelearningthatcanprovidealensformakingmeaningandguidingtransformativeleaderpractice.

QMIndicatorsofEffectivePedagogy-Andragogy:1. ActiveLearningStrategies2. ExperientialLearningActivities3. ReflectivePractices4. FormativeFeedback5. PerformanceBenchmarking6. CulturallyResponsivePedagogy

Domain3:Pedagogy-Andragogy

© Education Development Center, Inc. 18

Page 19: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Domain3:Pedagogy-AndragogyQMIndicators Level4 Level3 Level2 Level1

1 ActiveLearningStrategies

ALLcoursesconsistentlyuseactivelearningstrategiesincludingproject-basedandcase-basedinstructiontoengagecandidatesinthecontentbeingstudied.

MOSTcoursesconsistentlyuseactivelearningstrategiesincludingproject-basedandcase-basedinstructiontoengagecandidatesinthecontentbeingstudied.

SOMEcoursesconsistentlyuseactivelearningstrategiesincludingproject-basedandcase-basedinstructiontoengagecandidatesinthecontentbeingstudied.

FEW/NOcoursesconsistentlyuseactivelearningstrategiesincludingproject-basedandcase-basedinstructiontoengagecandidatesinthecontentbeingstudied.

2ExperientialLearningActivities

ALLcoursesincludestructuredexperientiallearningactivitiesinwhichlearnersapplynewlearningandbecomefamiliarwithvariousreal-worldcontextsandassociatedskillrequirements.

MOSTcoursesincludestructuredexperientiallearningactivitiesinwhichlearnersapplynewlearningandbecomefamiliarwithvariousreal-worldcontextsandassociatedskillrequirements.

SOMEcoursesincludestructuredexperientiallearningactivitiesinwhichlearnersapplynewlearningandbecomefamiliarwithvariousreal-worldcontextsandassociatedskillrequirements.

FEW/NOcoursesincludestructuredexperientiallearningactivitiesinwhichlearnersapplynewlearningandbecomefamiliarwithvariousreal-worldcontextsandassociatedskillrequirements.

3 ReflectivePractices

ALLcoursesincorporatereflectivepracticesasastandardofpracticeindevelopingtheessentialhabitofself-examinationandcontinuousimprovementofone’spractice.

MOSTcoursesincorporatereflectivepracticesasastandardofpracticeindevelopingtheessentialhabitofself-examinationandcontinuousimprovementofone’spractice.

SOMEcoursesincorporatereflectivepracticesasastandardofpracticeindevelopingtheessentialhabitofself-examinationandcontinuousimprovementofone’spractice.

FEW/NOcoursesincorporatereflectivepracticesasastandardofpracticeindevelopingtheessentialhabitofself-examinationandcontinuousimprovementofone’spractice.

4 FormativeFeedback

ALLcoursesuseformativefeedbackasanessentialtoolinguidinglearningtowardstatedgoals,objectivesandperformancebenchmarks.

MOSTcoursesuseformativefeedbackasanessentialtoolinguidinglearningperformancetowardstatedgoals,objectivesandperformancebenchmarks.

SOMEcoursesuseformativefeedbackasanessentialtoolinguidinglearningperformancetowardstatedgoals,objectivesandperformancebenchmarks.

FEW/NOcoursesuseformativefeedbackasanessentialtoolinguidinglearningperformancetowardstatedgoals,objectivesandperformancebenchmarks.

5 PerformanceBenchmarking

ALLcoursesprovidecandidateswithperformancebenchmarksofbestpracticesforuseinreflectinguponandrefiningspecificcompetenciesbeingdeveloped.

MOSTcoursesprovidecandidateswithperformancebenchmarksofbestpracticesforuseinreflectinguponandrefiningspecificcompetenciesbeingdeveloped.

SOMEcoursesprovidecandidateswithperformancebenchmarksofbestpracticesforuseinreflectinguponandrefiningspecificcompetenciesbeingdeveloped.

FEW/NOcoursesprovidecandidateswithperformancebenchmarksofbestpracticesforuseinreflectinguponandrefiningspecificcompetenciesbeingdeveloped.

6CulturallyResponsivePedagogy

ALLcoursesuseculturallyresponsivemethodstodevelopleadercompetenciesatthepersonal,instructional,andinstitutionallevel.

MOSTcoursesuseculturallyresponsivemethodstodevelopleadercompetenciesatthepersonal,instructional,andinstitutionallevel.

SOMEcoursesuseculturallyresponsivemethodstodevelopleadercompetenciesatthepersonal,instructional,andinstitutionallevel.

FEW/NOcoursesuseculturallyresponsivemethodstodevelopleadercompetenciesatthepersonal,instructional,andinstitutionallevel.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 19

Page 20: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Clinicalpracticeisdefinedasaformofexperientiallearningthatintegratesknowledgeandtheorylearnedincourseswithpracticalapplicationandskilldevelopmentinareal-world,professionalsetting.Theseexperiencesareintendedtogivestudentstheopportunitytogainvaluableappliedknowledgeandmakeconnectionstotheprofessionalfieldbeingconsideredasapossiblecareerpath.Additionally,itgivesprospectiveemployerstheopportunitytoguideandevaluatetalent.8Practicumsandinternshipsaretwoformsofschool-basedexperientiallearningoftenusedbypreparationprogramsandschooldistrictstoprovideaspiringprincipalswithexperientiallearningexperiencesinrealschoolsettings.

Practicum Internship

Acomponentofsomeeducationalprogramswherestudentsareplacedinareal-worldsetting(i.e.,classroomorschool)toobservetheworkofprofessionalswhilealsospendingsometimeperformingassignedtasksthemselves.Typically,studentsarealsoenrolledinacourseconnectedtothepracticumfordeeperunderstandingandmeaningfulfacilitationofwhatisbeinglearnedduringtheexperience.

Ashort-termopportunityforstudentstowork(paidorunpaid)foranemployerwhere,ideally,theiracademiclearningcanbeappliedtoreal-worldtasks.Astructuredacademicprogramwherestudents“learnandearn”byworkingatajobsitewhiletakingalimitednumberofacademiccourses.Apprenticeshipscantakebetween3-4years,oftenrequireon-the-jobtraining,andcanleadtoprofessionalcertificationandoftenfull-timeemploymentatthejobsite.

QMIndicatorsofEffectiveClinicalPractice:

1. ClinicalDesign2. ClinicalQuality3. ClinicalCoaching4. ClinicalSupervision5. ClinicalPlacements6. ClinicalEvaluation

8NationalAssociationofCollegesandEmployers(2011).Positionstatement:U.S.internships.Retrievedfromwww.naceweb.org/advocacy/position-statements/united-states-internships.aspx

Domain4:ClinicalPractice

© Education Development Center, Inc. 20

Page 21: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Domain4:ClinicalPracticeQMIndicators Level4 Level3 Level2 Level1

1 ClinicalDesign

ALLclinicaldesignsareco-developedbyacademicfaculty,prospectiveemployers,andcandidates.Theyareanchoredtoacademiccourseworkandarticulateclearandspecificlearningandcareerdevelopmentgoals/targetsforeachcandidate.

MOSTclinicaldesignsareco-developedbyacademicfaculty,prospectiveemployers,andcandidates.Theyareanchoredtoacademiccourseworkandarticulateclearandspecificlearningandcareerdevelopmentgoals/targetsforeachcandidate.

SOMEclinicaldesignsareco-developedbyacademicfaculty,prospectiveemployers,andcandidates.Theyareanchoredtoacademiccourseworkandarticulateclearandspecificlearningandcareerdevelopmentgoals/targetsforeachcandidate.

FEW/NOclinicaldesignsareco-developedbyacademicfaculty,prospectiveemployers,andcandidates.Theyareanchoredtoacademiccourseworkandarticulateclearandspecificlearningandcareerdevelopmentgoals/targetsforeachcandidate.

2 ClinicalQuality

ALLclinicalexperiencesareguidedbycriterionstandardsanddatasystemsthatproduceactionableinformationonthequalityandefficacyofclinicalexperiences.Standardsincludeexpectationsforthedurationoftheclinicalexperience,relevanthigh-levelleadershiptasks,high-qualityonsiteguidanceandmodeling,coordinationbetweenacademicprogramandschoolsitestoensurehigh-qualitylearningexperiencesforcandidates.

MOSTclinicalexperiencesareguidedbycriterionstandardsanddatasystemsthatproduceactionableinformationonthequalityandefficacyofclinicalexperiences.Standardsincludeexpectationsforthedurationoftheclinicalexperience,relevanthigh-levelleadershiptasks,high-qualityonsiteguidanceandmodeling,coordinationbetweenacademicprogramandschoolsitestoensurehigh-qualitylearningexperiencesforcandidates.

SOMEclinicalexperiencesareguidedbycriterionstandardsanddatasystemsthatproduceactionableinformationonthequalityandefficacyofclinicalexperiences.Standardsincludeexpectationsforthedurationoftheclinicalexperience,relevanthigh-levelleadershiptasks,high-qualityonsiteguidanceandmodeling,coordinationbetweenacademicprogramandschoolsitestoensurehigh-qualitylearningexperiencesforcandidates.

FEW/NOclinicalexperiencesareguidedbycriterionstandardsanddatasystemsthatproduceactionableinformationonthequalityandefficacyofclinicalexperiences.Standardsincludeexpectationsforthedurationoftheclinicalexperience,relevanthigh-levelleadershiptasks,high-qualityonsiteguidanceandmodeling,coordinationbetweenacademicprogramandschoolsitestoensurehigh-qualitylearningexperiencesforcandidates.

3 ClinicalCoaching

ALLcandidatesreceivedetailed,high-qualityfeedbackandcoachingsupport,frombothacademicstaffandseniorlevelprofessionals,onavarietyofauthentic,professional-leveltasks.

MOSTcandidatesreceivedetailed,high-qualityfeedbackandcoachingsupport,frombothacademicstaffandseniorlevelprofessionals,onavarietyofauthentic,professional-leveltasks.

SOMEcandidatesreceivedetailed,high-qualityfeedbackandcoachingsupport,frombothacademicstaffandseniorlevelprofessionals,onavarietyofauthentic,professional-leveltasks.

FEW/NOcandidatesreceivedetailed,high-qualityfeedbackandcoachingsupport,frombothacademicstaffandseniorlevelprofessionals,onavarietyofauthentic,professional-leveltasks.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 21

Page 22: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Domain4:ClinicalPracticeQMIndicators Level4 Level3 Level2 Level1

4 ClinicalSupervision

ALLcandidatesaresupervisedthroughoutthedurationoftheirclinicalexperience,bybothacademicstaffandaschool-sitesupervisor(s).Performanceexpectationsandevaluationcriteriaareclearlydefined,priortobeginningtheclinicalexperience,byacademicstaffandschoolsitesupervisors.

MOSTcandidatesaresupervisedthroughoutthedurationoftheirclinicalexperience,bybothacademicstaffandaschool-sitesupervisor(s).Performanceexpectationsandevaluationcriteriaareclearlydefined,priortobeginningtheclinicalexperience,byacademicstaffandschoolsitesupervisors.

SOMEcandidatesaresupervisedthroughoutthedurationoftheirclinicalexperience,bybothacademicstaffandaschool-sitesupervisor(s).Performanceexpectationsandevaluationcriteriaareclearlydefined,priortobeginningtheclinicalexperience,byacademicstaffandschoolsitesupervisors.

FEW/NOcandidatesaresupervisedthroughoutthedurationoftheirclinicalexperience,bybothacademicstaffandaschool-sitesupervisor(s).Performanceexpectationsandevaluationcriteriaareclearlydefined,priortobeginningtheclinicalexperience,byacademicstaffandschoolsitesupervisors.

5 ClinicalPlacements

ALLclinicalplacementsareidentifiedbyacademicprogramstaffandensurethatschoolsitesareadequatelyresourcedtoprovidecandidateswithahigh-qualityclinicalexperience.

MOSTclinicalplacementsareidentifiedbyacademicprogramstaffandensurethatschoolsitesareadequatelyresourcedtoprovidecandidateswithahigh-qualityclinicalexperience.

SOMEclinicalplacementsareidentifiedbyacademicprogramstaffandensurethatschoolsitesareadequatelyresourcedtoprovidecandidateswithahigh-qualityclinicalexperience.

FEW/NOclinicalplacementsareidentifiedbyacademicprogramstaffandensurethatschoolsitesareadequatelyresourcedtoprovidecandidateswithahigh-qualityclinicalexperience.

6 ClinicalEvaluation

ALLcandidateclinicalevaluationsarebasedonsystematicallydevelopedprogramassessmentcriteriaandusedtoguidefieldsupervisionandevaluationappropriateforaspecificclinicalcontext.

MOSTcandidateclinicalevaluationsarebasedonsystematicallydevelopedprogramassessmentcriteriaandusedtoguidefieldsupervisionandevaluationappropriateforaspecificclinicalcontext.

SOMEcandidateclinicalevaluationsarebasedonsystematicallydevelopedprogramassessmentcriteriaandusedtoguidefieldsupervisionandevaluationappropriateforaspecificclinicalcontext.

FEW/NOcandidateclinicalevaluationsarebasedonsystematicallydevelopedprogramassessmentcriteriaandusedtoguidefieldsupervisionandevaluationappropriateforaspecificclinicalcontext.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 22

Page 23: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

© Education Development Center, Inc. 23

Page 24: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Criterion-referencedassessmentsaredesignedtomeasurecandidateperformanceagainstafixedsetofpredeterminedcriteriaorlearningstandards—i.e.,concise,writtendescriptionsofwhatcandidatesareexpectedtoknowandbeabletodoataspecificstageoftheireducation.Theyareusedtoevaluatewhethercandidateshavelearnedaspecificbodyofknowledgeoracquiredaspecificskillset.Ifcandidatesperformatorabovetheestablishedexpectations,theyaredeemedtobeproficient.Inafullycriterion-referencedsystem,objectives(learningoutcomes)definewhatstudentsneedtoknowandbeabletodo(content),howtheywillbetaught(pedagogy),andhowlearningwillbeassessed.9Inacriterion-referencedsystemofassessment,instructorresponsibilitiesincludelinking/scaffoldinglearningandteachingactivitiestotheintendedoutcomesandstructuringassessmentsappropriatetotheleveloflearningexpected.

QMIndicatorsofEffectivePerformanceAssessment:

1. AssessmentPurpose2. CandidatePerformanceTargets3. AssessmentQuality4. AssessmentMethods5. CommunicationofAssessmentResults6. AssessmentImpact

9Biggs,J.,&Tang,C.(2011).Teachingforqualitylearningatuniversity:Whatthestudentdoes(4thed.).NewYork:McGraw-HillEducation.

Domain5:PerformanceAssessment

© Education Development Center, Inc. 24

Page 25: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Domain5:PerformanceAssessment

QMIndicators Level4 Level3 Level2 Level1

1 AssessmentPurpose

ALLassessmentsaredesignedtocollectevidenceofcandidateprogresstowardproficiencythatisthenusedtoinforminstructionaldecisions.

MOSTassessmentsaredesignedtocollectevidenceofcandidateprogresstowardproficiencythatisthenusedtoinforminstructionaldecisions.

SOMEassessmentsaredesignedtocollectevidenceofcandidateprogresstowardproficiencythatisthenusedtoinforminstructionaldecisions.

FEW/NOassessmentsaredesignedtocollectevidenceofcandidateprogresstowardproficiencythatisthenusedtoinforminstructionaldecisions.

2CandidatePerformanceTargets

ALLcandidateperformancetargetsareclearlyarticulatedandalignwithhigh-priorityleaderperformancestandardsthatformthefoundationforcandidateassessments.

MOSTcandidateperformancetargetsareclearlyarticulatedandalignwithhigh-priorityleaderperformancestandardsthatformthefoundationforcandidateassessments.

SOMEcandidateperformancetargetsareclearlyarticulatedandalignwithhigh-priorityleaderperformancestandardsthatformthefoundationforcandidateassessments.

FEW/NOcandidateperformancetargetsareclearlyarticulatedandalignwithhigh-priorityleaderperformancestandardsthatformthefoundationforcandidateassessments.

3 AssessmentQuality

ALLassessmentsfacilitatevalidevaluationofcomplexcompetencies,promotelearning,andarecomplementedwithexemplarsand/ormodelsofperformance.Assessmentsmakeexpectationsandcriteriaexplicitwhichenablesfeedbackandpromotesself-assessment.

MOSTassessmentsfacilitatevalidevaluationofcomplexcompetencies,promotelearning,andarecomplementedwithexemplarsand/ormodelsofperformance.Assessmentsmakeexpectationsandcriteriaexplicitwhichenablesfeedbackandpromotesself-assessment.

SOMEassessmentsfacilitatevalidevaluationofcomplexcompetencies,promotelearning,andarecomplementedwithexemplarsand/ormodelsofperformance.Assessmentsmakeexpectationsandcriteriaexplicitwhichenablesfeedbackandpromotesself-assessment.

FEW/NOassessmentsfacilitatevalidevaluationofcomplexcompetencies,promotelearning,andarecomplementedwithexemplarsand/ormodelsofperformance.Assessmentsmakeexpectationsandcriteriaexplicitwhichenablesfeedbackandpromotesself-assessment.

4 AssessmentMethods

ALLassessmentmethodsaretightlylinkedtolearningtargetsandcollectbothformativeandsummativedatathatprovideasufficientsampleofcandidateperformancedatatoreliablyinferlevelsofproficiencyforaparticularperformancetarget.

MOSTassessmentmethodsaretightlylinkedtolearningtargetsandcollectbothformativeandsummativedatathatprovideasufficientsampleofcandidateperformancedatatoreliablyinferlevelsofproficiencyforaparticularperformancetarget.

SOMEassessmentmethodsaretightlylinkedtolearningtargetsandcollectbothformativeandsummativedatathatprovideasufficientsampleofcandidateperformancedatatoreliablyinferlevelsofproficiencyforaparticularperformancetarget.

FEW/NOassessmentmethodsaretightlylinkedtolearningtargetsandcollectbothformativeandsummativedatathatprovideasufficientsampleofcandidateperformancedatatoreliablyinferlevelsofproficiencyforaparticularperformancetarget.

5CommunicationofAssessmentResults

ALLmethodsforcommunicatingcandidateassessmentdataproduceaccurate,timely,andimmediatelyusableinformationaboutthelevelofcandidatemasteryofperformancetarget(s).

MOSTmethodsforcommunicatingcandidateassessmentdataproduceaccurate,timely,andimmediatelyusableinformationaboutthelevelofcandidatemasteryofperformancetarget(s).

SOMEmethodsforcommunicatingcandidateassessmentdataproduceaccurate,timely,andimmediatelyusableinformationaboutthelevelofcandidatemasteryofperformancetarget(s).

FEW/NOmethodsforcommunicatingcandidateassessmentdataproduceaccurate,timely,andimmediatelyusableinformationaboutthelevelofcandidatemasteryofperformancetarget(s).

6 AssessmentImpact

ALLcandidatesuseassessmentdataandcontinuousimprovementprocessestotakechargeoftheirownprogresstowardperformancemasteryandgrowthovertime.

MOSTcandidatesuseassessmentdataandcontinuousimprovementprocessestotakechargeoftheirownprogresstowardperformancemasteryandgrowthovertime.

SOMEcandidatesuseassessmentdataandcontinuousimprovementprocessestotakechargeoftheirownprogresstowardperformancemasteryandgrowthovertime.

FEW/NOcandidatesuseassessmentdataandcontinuousimprovementprocessestotakechargeoftheirownprogresstowardperformancemasteryandgrowthovertime.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 25

Page 26: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Outcomesareclearlearningresultsthatwewantstudentstodemonstrateattheendofsignificantlearningexperiences.Theyarenotvalues,beliefs,attitudes,orpsychologicalstatesofmind.Instead,outcomesarewhatlearnerscanactuallydowithwhattheyknowandhavelearned.Theyarethetangibleapplicationofwhathasbeenlearned.Thismeansthatoutcomesareactionsandperformancesthatembodyandreflectlearnercompetenceinusingcontent,information,ideas,andtoolssuccessfully.Havinglearnersdoimportantthingswithwhattheyknowisamajorstepbeyondknowingitself.Becauseoutcomesinvolveactualdoing,ratherthanjustknowingoravarietyofotherpurelymentalprocesses,theymustbedefinedaccordingtotheactionsordemonstrationprocessesbeingsought.10

QMIndicatorsofEffectivePrincipalPreparation:1. ExitCompetencies2. StateCertification3. SchoolDistrictEligibility4. SchoolDistrictHiring5. JobPlacementandRetention11,126. JobPerformance

10Spady,W.G.(1994).Outcome-basededucation:Criticalissuesandanswers.Arlington,VA:AmericanAssociationofSchoolAdministrators.11Daloisio,J.(2017).Principalchurn:Acasestudyonprincipalturnoverandstrategiestobuildsustainabilityandcontinuity(Doctoraldissertation).Retrievedfromhttp://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/33237/12Goldring,R.,&Taie,S.(2014).Principalattritionandmobility:Resultsfromthe2012–13PrincipalFollow-upSurvey(NCES2014-064rev).Washington,DC:U.S.DepartmentofEducation,NationalCenterforEducationStatistics.Retrievedfromhttp://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch(accessed2017October)

Domain6:GraduatePerformanceOutcomes

© Education Development Center, Inc. 26

Page 27: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Domain6:GraduatePerformanceOutcomesQMIndicators Level4 Level3 Level2 Level1

1 ExitCompetencies

ALLcandidatesdemonstrateprogramexitcompetenciesrequiredtobecomeeducationleaders,basedonprogramexitexams,professionalstandardsforeducationalleaders,andlocalschooldistrictperformanceexpectationsforprincipalandassistantprincipal.

MOSTcandidatesdemonstrateprogramexitcompetenciesrequiredtobecomeeducationleaders,basedonprogramexitexams,professionalstandardsforeducationalleaders,andlocalschooldistrictperformanceexpectationsforprincipalandassistantprincipal.

SOMEcandidatesdemonstrateprogramexitcompetenciesrequiredtobecomeeducationleaders,basedonprogramexitexams,professionalstandardsforeducationalleaders,andlocalschooldistrictperformanceexpectationsforprincipalandassistantprincipal.

FEW/NOcandidatesdemonstrateprogramexitcompetenciesrequiredtobecomeeducationleaders,basedonprogramexitexams,professionalstandardsforeducationalleaders,andlocalschooldistrictperformanceexpectationsforprincipalandassistantprincipal.

2 StateCertification

ALLprogramgraduatesarecertifiedandlicensedbythestateuponprogramcompletionoradvancedtothenextlevelofthestatecertificationprocess.

MOSTprogramgraduatesarecertifiedandlicensedbythestateuponprogramcompletionoradvancedtothenextlevelofthestatecertificationprocess.

SOMEprogramgraduatesarecertifiedandlicensedbythestateuponprogramcompletionoradvancedtothenextlevelofthestatecertificationprocess.

FEW/NOprogramgraduatesarecertifiedandlicensedbythestateuponprogramcompletionoradvancedtothenextlevelofthestatecertificationprocess.

3SchoolDistrictEligibility

ALLeligibleprogramgraduatesareadmittedintooneormoreschooldistrictapplicantpoolsandareeligibletobeinterviewedforprincipaland/orassistantprincipalpositions.

MOSTeligibleprogramgraduatesareadmittedintooneormoreschooldistrictapplicantpoolsandareeligibletobeinterviewedforprincipaland/orassistantprincipalpositions.

SOMEeligibleprogramgraduatesareadmittedintooneormoreschooldistrictapplicantpoolsandareeligibletobeinterviewedforprincipaland/orassistantprincipalpositions.

FEW/NOeligibleprogramgraduatesareadmittedintooneormoreschooldistrictapplicantpoolsandareeligibletobeinterviewedforprincipaland/orassistantprincipalpositions.

4 SchoolDistrictHiring

ALLeligibleprogramgraduatesarehiredasprincipalsand/orassistantprincipalleadershippositionswithinoneyearofprogramcompletionorprogresstothenextlevelofthehiringprocess.

MOSTeligibleprogramgraduatesarehiredasprincipalsand/orassistantprincipalleadershippositionswithinoneyearofprogramcompletionorprogresstothenextlevelofthehiringprocess.

SOMEeligibleprogramgraduatesarehiredasprincipalsand/orassistantprincipalleadershippositionswithinoneyearofprogramcompletionorprogresstothenextlevelofthehiringprocess.

FEW/NOeligibleprogramgraduatesarehiredasprincipalsand/orassistantprincipalleadershippositionswithinoneyearofprogramcompletionorprogresstothenextlevelofthehiringprocess.

5 JobPlacementandRetention

ALLprogramgraduateshiredbyaschooldistrictareplacedinvacanciesinchronicallylowperformingschoolsandremaininthesamepositionforatleastthreeyears.

MOSTprogramgraduateshiredbyaschooldistrictareplacedinvacanciesinchronicallylowperformingschoolsandremaininthesamepositionforatleastthreeyears.

SOMEprogramgraduateshiredbyaschooldistrictareplacedinvacanciesinchronicallylowperformingschoolsandremaininthesamepositionforatleastthreeyears.

FEW/NOprogramgraduateshiredbyaschooldistrictareplacedinvacanciesinchronicallylowperformingschoolsandremaininthesamepositionforatleastthreeyears.

6 JobPerformance

ALLprogramgraduatesplacedinleadershippositionseithermeetorexceedexpectationsondistrictperformanceevaluationsduringtheirinductionperiod.

MOSTprogramgraduatesplacedinleadershippositionseithermeetorexceedexpectationsondistrictperformanceevaluationsduringtheirinductionperiod.

SOMEprogramgraduatesplacedinleadershippositionseithermeetorexceedexpectationsondistrictperformanceevaluationsduringtheirinductionperiod.

FEW/NOprogramgraduatesplacedinleadershippositionseithermeetorexceedexpectationsondistrictperformanceevaluationsduringtheirinductionperiod.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 27

Page 28: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

GlossaryofTerms

Thisglossaryof terms is includedhereasaquick reference tool for self-study teamsengaged in theprocessofexamining theirprincipalpreparationprogrampracticesusingQualityMeasures™rubrics.Theglossaryisintendedtooffergeneraldefinitionsoftermstoassistteamsindevelopingasharedunderstandingofindicatorsassociatedwitheachprogramdomain.

Domain1:CandidateAdmissionsMarketingStrategy:Acomprehensiveplanforrecruitingadiversepoolofhighlyqualifiedapplicantstoenrollintheinstitution’sprincipalpreparationprogram.RecruitmentPractices:Specificactionstakenbyprogramstoattractapplicantswhodemonstratestrongpotentialforbecomingeffectiveschoolleaders.Practicesmayinclude:strategicsocialmedia,digitalcampaigns(websitewithanalytics),event-basedoutreachthatinvolvesdirectinteractionwithprospectivestudents,andotherpracticesthattargetethnicandgenderspecificapplicants.AdmissionsStandards:Admissionstandardsdefinethespecificrequirementsforscreeningprogramapplicationsandselectingcandidatesforadmission.ApplicantScreening:Referstospecificprocessesdesignedandimplementedtoscreenapplicationsinordertoidentifyhighlyqualifiedapplicantswhomeetprogramadmissionrequirements.PredictorAssessments:Abatteryofassessmentsusedaspartoftheapplicantscreeningprocesstopredictdifferentleadershipbehaviors(e.g.,task-orientedbehaviors,relational-orientedbehaviors,andchange-orientedbehaviors).CandidateSelection:Processesusedtoselectcandidateforadmissiontotheprogram.Mayincludeface-to-faceinterviews,jobshadows,referencechecks.Mayinvolveaselectioncommitteecomprisedofprogramfacultyandschooldistrictstaff.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 28

Page 29: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Domain2:CourseContentStandardsBased:ReferstoProfessionalStandardsforSchoolLeaders(PSEL).LearningGoals:Identifyboththeleaderbehaviortobedevelopedandthecontextwithinwhichthebehaviorwillbeperformed.CourseDesign:Approachtodesigningcurriculumthatintegrateslearninggoals,coursecontent,learningactivities,resourcesandmaterials,andcourseassessmentmeasures.CourseEvaluation:Theprocessofgatheringinformationabouttheimpactoflearningandofteachingpracticeonstudentlearning,analyzingandinterpretingthatinformation,andrespondingtoandactingontheresults.CourseCoherence:Referstoasetofinterrelatedcoursesandlearningexperiencesthatarelogicallysequenced(verticallyaligned)andguidedbyacommonframework/designforcurriculum,instruction,assessment,andlearningclimate,andpursuedoverasustainedperiodoftime.

Domain3:Pedagogy-AndragogyActiveLearning:Amethodoflearningthatengagesstudentsintwoaspectsofthelearningprocess–doingthingsandthinkingaboutthethingstheyaredoing.ExperientialLearning:Theprocessoflearningthroughexperience.Morespecificallydefinedas"learningthroughreflectionondoing."Experientiallearningisdistinctfromroteordidacticlearning,thelatterinwhichthelearnerplaysacomparativelypassiverole.ReflectivePractice:Involvesthepracticeofreflectingonone'sactionsasawaytoengageinaprocessofcontinuouslearning.Accordingtoonedefinition,reflectivepracticesinvolve"payingcriticalattentiontothepracticalvaluesandtheorieswhichinformeverydayactions.”FormativeFeedback:Ongoingfeedbackthroughoutthelearningprocessthatcanbeusedbyinstructorstoimprovetheirteachingandbystudentstoimprovetheirlearning.PerformanceBenchmarking:Awayofdiscoveringwhatisthebestperformancebeingachieved–whetherinaparticularcourse,inacompetitorprogram,orinanentirelydifferentindustry.Thisinformationcanthenbeusedtoidentifygapsinprogramcontentandprocessesinordertoimproveoutcomesandachieveacompetitiveadvantage.CulturallyResponsivePedagogy:Aninstructionalmethodthatisgroundedinteachers'displayingskillatteachinginacross-culturalormulticulturalsetting.Enablesstudentstorelatecoursecontenttotheirownculturalexperiences.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 29

Page 30: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Domain4:ClinicalPracticeClinicalDesign:Referstotheessentialelementsofaneffectiveexperientiallearningexperiencethatintegratesknowledgeandtheorylearnedintheclassroomwithpracticalapplicationandskillsdevelopmentinaprofessionalschoolsetting.Essentialelementsincludelearninggoalsthatarestructuredintothelearningexperienceandsupervisedbyaprofessionalwithrelevantandrelatedbackgroundinthefield.Theoverallclinicaldesignbalancestheintern’slearninggoalswiththeorganization’s(school)needs.Maybepart-timeorfull-time.ClinicalQuality:Referstothedegreetowhichclinicaldesignsincorporatethedesignelementsthatresultindesiredlearnerperformanceoutcomes.ClinicalCoaching:Referstothededicatedtimesupervisorsand/orcoachesspendobservingandprovidingfeedbacktointernsonbothaccomplishmentsandareasforimprovement.Includesintentionalsupportintheintern’stransitionfromtheclassroomtotheworkplace.ClinicalSupervision:Referstothelevelofguidanceandoversightprovidedtointerns.Generallyincludes:familiarizingthemwiththeschoolassignment,providingassignments,andservingasa“contact”personforquestions.Internshipsupervisionshouldbeconductedbyanexpertinthetypeofworktheintern(s)willbeperformingtoprovidetheappropriateguidancefortheintern’sassignments.Aninternsupervisor’sresponsibilitiestypicallyinclude:takingpartinanintern’splacement,screening,andinterviewprocess;conductingtheinternorientation;developinginternlearninggoals;meetingwithandobservinganinternregularlytoevaluateperformanceanddetermineifneeds/goalsarebeingmet;andassessingtheinternshipprogram’ssuccess.ClinicalPlacements:Referstotheprofessionalschoolsidentifiedforinternstocompletetheexperientialsegmentoftheirpreparationandtraining.ClinicalEvaluation:Referstotheevaluationoftheintern’sinitiallearningobjectivesidentifiedatthestartoftheinternship.Typically,supervisorsareaskedtoevaluateinternsatthemidpointandendoftheinternship.Employersareencouragedtoreviewtheinternshipwiththeinternbeforeheorsheleaves.Evaluationsarehelpfulindeterminingtheintern’ssuccesswithintheassignedschoolandalsoserveaspredictorsofsuccessforfutureinternshipsoremploymentupongraduation.

Domain5:PerformanceAssessmentFormativeAssessment:Providesfeedbacktoteachersandlearnersthroughouttheteachingandlearningprocessaboutwhatisworking,whatisnotworking,andwhatthestudentandtheteachershoulddonexttoimprove.

SummativeAssessment:Measurestheextenttowhichthelearnerhasaccomplishedtheintendedlearningoutcomesandcontributestothefinalgrade.Itismostoftenusedattheendofacourseofstudytoquantifylearningachievementandprovidedatafordeterminingthenextlevelofstudy.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 30

Page 31: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

CandidatePerformanceTargets:Definesthespecificlearnerperformancetobeaccomplishedbytheendofthecourseofstudyaswellasinterimindicatorsofprogressalongtheway.AssessmentQuality:Asusedhere,assessmentqualityisdefinedastheextenttowhichanassessmentaccuratelymeasurestheperformanceitisintendedtomeasure.AssessmentMethods:Referstothestrategies,techniques,toolsandinstrumentsusedtocollectinformationtodeterminetheextenttowhichlearnersdemonstratedesiredlearningoutcomes.Severaldifferentmethodsshouldbeusedtoassesslearneroutcomes.CommunicationofAssessmentResults:Referstothemethodsandtimelinesusedtocommunicateprogresstowardperformancetargetsandlearninggoalstolearners.AssessmentImpact:Referstothemethodsusedtodeterminetheeffectsofteachingandlearningonchangesinlearnerbehaviors,eitherintendedorunintended.

Domain6:GraduatePerformanceOutcomesExitCompetencies:Ageneralstatementthatdescribesthedesiredknowledge,skills,andbehaviorsofastudentgraduatingfromaprogram(orcompletingacourse).Competenciescommonlydefinetheappliedskillsandknowledgethatenablepeopletosuccessfullyperforminprofessional,educational,andotherlifecontexts.StateCertification:Thecertificationprocessisdifferentforeachstate,butmoststatesrequireanin-depthanalysisofapotentialprincipal'sbackground,aswellasexamsthattesthisorherknowledgeofrunningaschool.SchoolDistrictEligibility:Referstothenumberofgraduatesfromcertifiedprincipalpreparationprogramswhomeetschooldistrictrequirementsand,asaresult,areeligibletobeinterviewedbytheschooldistrictforthepositionofschoolprincipal.Requirementsforhiringeligibilityvarybyschooldistrict.SchoolDistrictHiring:Referstothenumberofgraduatesfromcertifiedprincipalpreparationprogramswhoarehiredbyschooldistrictsasschoolprincipals.JobPlacementandRetention:Referstothenumberofgraduatesfromcertifiedprincipalpreparationprogramswhoareplacedasfirst-yearprincipalsorassistantprincipalsinchronicallylowperformingschools,andtheirtenureintheposition.JobPerformance:Referstothenumberofgraduatesfromcertifiedprincipalpreparationprogramswhomeetorexceedschooldistrictperformanceexpectationsasreflectedinperformanceevaluationsconductedduringthefirstthreeyearsofinduction.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 31

Page 32: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

DOMAIN1:CANDIDATEADMISSIONSBray,D.W.(1982).Theassessmentcenterandthestudyoflives.AmericanPsychologist,37,108-189.Bray,D.W.,&Howard,A.(1983).TheAT&Tlongitudinalstudiesofmanagers.InK.W.Schaie(Ed.),Longitudinalstudiesofadultpsychological

development(pp.112-146).NewYork:Guilford.Frolich,N.,&Stensaker,B.(2010).Studentrecruitmentstrategiesinhighereducation:Promotingexcellenceanddiversity?International

JournalofEducationalManagement,24(4),359-370.doi:10.1108/09513541011045281.Hogan,R.,Curphy,G.J.,&Hogan,J.(1994).Whatweknowaboutleadership:Effectivenessandpersonality.AmericanPsychologist,49(6),493-504.Howard,A.(1986).Collegeexperiencesandmanagerialperformance.JournalofAppliedPsychology,71(3),530-552.doi:10.1037/0021-

9010.71.3.530Mitgang,L.(2012).Themakingoftheprincipal:Fivelessonsinleadershiptraining.NewYork:TheWallaceFoundation.NoelLevitz,R.(2013).Marketingandstudentrecruitmentpracticesbenchmarkreportforfour-yearandtwo-yearinstitutions.CedarRapids,IA:

RuffaloNoelLevitz.Retrievedfromwww.RuffaloNL.com/BenchmarkReportsNoelLevitz,R.(2016).Marketingandstudentrecruitmentpracticesbenchmarkreportforfour-yearcollegesanduniversities.CedarRapids,IA:

RuffaloNoelLevitz.Retrievedfromwww.RuffaloNL.com/BenchmarkReportsDOMAIN2:COURSECONTENTAckoff,R.L.(1974).Redesigningthefuture:Systemsapproachtosocietalproblems.NewYork:JohnWiley&Sons.Anyon,J.(1997).Ghettoschooling:Apoliticaleconomyofurbaneducationalreform.NewYork:TeachersCollegePress.Anyon,J.(2005).Radicalpossibilities:Publicpolicy,urbaneducation,andanewsocialmovement.NewYork:Routledge.doi:

10.1177/0042085907304904Argyris,C.&Schön,D.A.(1974).Theoryinpractice:Increasingprofessionaleffectiveness.SanFrancisco,CA:Jossey-Bass.Au,K.H.,&Kawakami,A.J.(1994).Culturalcongruenceininstruction.InE.R.Hollins,J.E.King,&W.C.Hayman,(Eds.),Teachingdiverse

populations:Formulatingaknowledgebase(pp.5–23).Albany,NY:StateUniversityofNewYorkPress.Banathy,B.H.(1991).Systemsdesignofeducation:Ajourneytocreatethefuture.EnglewoodCliffs,NJ:EducationalTechnologyPublications.Banks,J.A.,Cookson,P.,Gay,G.,Hawley,W.D.,Irvine,J.J.,Nieto,S.,Schofield,J.W.,&Stephan,W.G.(2001).Diversitywithinunity:Essential

principlesforteachingandlearninginamulticulturalsociety.PhiDeltaKappan,83(3),196–203.Beabout,B.R.(2012).Turbulence,perturbance,andeducationalchange.Complicity:AnInternationalJournalofComplexityandEducation,9(2),15-29.

SelectedReferences

© Education Development Center, Inc. 32

Page 33: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Beabout,B.R.(2014).Communityleadership:Seekingsocialjusticewhilere-creatingpublicschoolsinpost-KatrinaNewOrleans.InBogotch,I.,&Shields,C.(Eds.),Internationalhandbookofeducationalleadershipandsocial(in)justice.SpringerInternationalHandbooksofEducation,29,543-570.Dordrecht,Netherlands:Springer.

Beabout,B.R.(2014).Principlesofleadingchange:Aninductiveanalysisfrompost-KatrinaNewOrleans.PolicyFuturesinEducation,12(8),1048-1063.Beabout,B.R.,&Jakiel,L.B.(2011).Familyengagementincharterschools.InS.Redding,M.Murphy,&P.Sheley(Eds.),Handbookonfamilyand

communityengagement(pp.147–151).Charlotte,NC:InformationAgePublishing.Berends,M.,Chun,J.,SchuylerIkemoto,G.,Stockly,S.,&Briggs,R.J.(2002).Challengesofconflictingschoolreforms:EffectsofnewAmerican

schoolsinahigh-povertydistrict.SantaMonica,CA:RANDCorporation.Biggs,J.B.(2014).Constructivealignmentinuniversityteaching.HERDSAReviewofHigherEducation,1,5-22.Borko,H.,Wolf,S.A.,Simone,G.&Uchiyama,K.P.(2003).Schoolsintransition:ReformeffortsandschoolcapacityinWashingtonstate.

EducationalEvaluationandPolicyAnalysis,25(2),171-201.doi:10.3102/01623737025002171Brook,V.(2006).Learning-focusedcurriculumdevelopment:TheredesignofelementsofaPGCEScience(SubjectYear)Programme.Investigations

inUniversityTeachingandLearning,3(2),27-35.Brown,J.K.(2008).Student-centeredinstruction:Involvingstudentsintheirowneducation.MusicEducatorsJournal,94(5),30-35.Brown,S.L.,&Eisenhardt,K.M.(1997).Theartofcontinuouschange:Linkingcomplexitytheoryandtime-pacedevolutioninrelentlesslyshifting

organizations.AdministrativeScienceQuarterly,42(1),1-34.doi:10.2307/2393807Bryk,A.S.,&Schneider,B.(2003).Trustinschools:Acoreresourceforschoolreform.CreatingCaringSchools,60(6),40-45.Bryk,A.S.,Sebring,P.B.,Allensworth,E.,Luppescu,S.,&Easton,J.Q.(2010).Organizingschoolsforimprovement:LessonsfromChicago.Chicago,

IL:UniversityofChicagoPress.Bryk,A.S.,Sebring,P.B.,Kerbow,D.,RollowS.G.,&Easton,J.Q.(1999).ChartingChicagoschoolreform:Democraticlocalismasaleverfor

change.Boulder,CO:WestviewPress.Bulkley,K.E.,Henig,J.R.,&Levin,H.M.(2010).Betweenpublicandprivate:Politics,governance,andthenewportfoliomodelsforurbanschool

reform.Cambridge,MA:HarvardEducationPress.Carr-Chellman,A.A.(2006).Userdesign.Mahwah,NJ:LawrenceErlbaumAssociates.Corcoran,T.,&Lawrence,N.(2003).Changingdistrictcultureandcapacity:TheimpactoftheMerckInstituteforScienceEducationPartnership.

CPREResearchReports.Philadelphia,PA:UniversityofPennsylvania,ConsortiumforPolicyResearchinEducation.CowenInstituteforPublicEducationInitiativesatTulaneUniversity(2008).ThestateofpubliceducationinNewOrleans:2008report.New

Orleans,LA:Author.Cuban,L.(1972).Ethniccontentand‘White’instruction.PhiDeltaKappan,53(5),270–273.Cuban,L.,&Usdan,M.D.(2002).Powerfulreformswithshallowroots:ImprovingAmerica'surbanschools.NewYork:TeachersCollegePress.DeVore,D.E.,&Logsdon,J.(1991).CrescentCitySchools:PubliceducationinNewOrleans,1841-1991.Lafayette,LA:CenterforLouisianaStudies,

UniversityofSouthwesternLouisiana.Dow,K.L.,&Braithwaite,V.(2013).Reviewofhighereducationregulationreport.Canberra,ACT:CommonwealthofAustralia.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 33

Page 34: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Drago-Severson,E.(2004a).Becomingadultlearners:Principlesandpracticesforeffectivedevelopment.NewYork,NY:TeachersCollegePress.Drago-Severson,E.(2004b).Helpingteacherslearn:Principalleadershipforadultgrowthanddevelopment.ThousandOaks,CA:Corwin.Drago-Severson,E.(2006a,March).Howcanyoubettersupportteachers’growth?TheLearningPrincipal,1(6),1,6-7.Drago-Severson,E.(2006b,Summer).Learning-orientedleadership:Transformingaschoolthroughaprogramofadultlearning.Independent

SchoolJournal,58-62.Drago-Severson,E.(2007).Helpingteacherslearn:Principalsasprofessionaldevelopmentleaders.TeachersCollegeRecord,109(1),70-125.Drago-Severson,E.(2009).Leadingadultlearning:Supportingadultdevelopmentinourschools.ThousandOaks,CA:CorwinandLearningForward.Drago-Severson,E.(2012).Helpingeducatorsgrow:Strategiesandpracticesforleadershipdevelopment.Cambridge,MA:HarvardEducationPress.Drago-Severson,E.(2016).Useavarietyofpracticestoconnectwithall.JournalofStaffDevelopment,37(1),38-42.Drago-Severson,E.,&Blum-DeStefano,J.(2016).TellmesoIcanhearyou:Adevelopmentalapproachtofeedbackforeducators.Cambridge,MA:

HarvardEducationPress.Drago-Severson,E.,Blum-DeStefano,J.,&Asghar,A.(2013).Learningforleadership:Developmentalstrategiesforbuildingcapacityinourschools.

ThousandOaks,CA:Corwin.Eisner,E.W.(1992).Educationalreformandtheecologyofschooling.TeachersCollegeRecord,93(4),610-627.Ellsworth,J.B.(2000).Survivingchange:Asurveyofeducationalchangemodels.Syracuse,NY:ERICClearinghouseonInformation&Technology.Elmore,R.F.,&Burney,D.(1997).Investinginteacherlearning:StaffdevelopmentandinstructionalimprovementinCommunityDistrict

2.Philadelphia,PA:ConsortiumforPolicyResearchinEducationandNationalCommissiononTeachingandAmerica'sFuture.Evans,R.(1996).Thehumansideofschoolchange:Reform,resistant,andtherealproblemsofinnovation.SanFrancisco,CA:Jossey-Bass.Felder,R.M.,&Brent,R.(1996).Navigatingthebumpyroadtostudent-centeredinstruction.CollegeTeaching,44(2),43-47.Ferris,R.M.(2012).Floodofconflict:ThestoryoftheNewOrleansFreeSchool.RoslynHeights,NY:AlternativeEducationResourceOrganization.Fink,D.(2003).Thelawofunintendedconsequences:The‘real’costoftop-downreform.JournalofEducationalChange,4(2),105-128.doi:

10.1023/A:1024783324566FishmanB.,Marx,R.W.,Blumenfeld,P.,Krajcik,J.,&Soloway,E.(2004).Creatingaframeworkforresearchonsystemictechnologyinnovations.

JournaloftheLearningSciences,13(1),43-76.doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_3Forsyth,P.B.,Adams,C.M.,&Hoy,W.K.(2011).Collectivetrust:Whyschoolscan'timprovewithoutit.NewYork:TeachersCollegePress.Freire,P.(1985).Thepoliticsofeducation:Culture,power,andliberation.(D.Macedo,Trans.).SouthHadley,MA:Bergin&GarveyPublishers.French,J.R.P.,&Raven,B.H.(1959).Thebasesofsocialpower.InD.Cartwright(Ed.),Studiesinsocialpower(pp.150–167).AnnArbor,

MI:InstituteforSocialResearch.Fullan,M.(2000).Thethreestoriesofeducationreform.PhiDeltaKappan,81(8),581–584.Fullan,M.(2001).Leadinginacultureofchange.SanFrancisco,CA:Jossey-Bass.Fusarelli,L.D.(2002).Tightlycoupledpolicyinlooselycoupledsystems:Institutionalcapacityandorganizationalchange.JournalofEducational

Administration,40(6),561-575.doi:10.1108/09578230210446045Gardner,H.(1983).Framesofmind:Thetheoryofmultipleintelligences.NewYork:BasicBooks.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 34

Page 35: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Gay,G.(1975).Organizinganddesigningculturallypluralisticcurriculum.EducationalLeadership,33(3),176–183.Gay,G.(2010).Culturallyresponsiveteaching:Theory,research,andpractice(2nded.).NewYork:TeachersCollegePress.Glaser,B.G.,&Strauss,A.L.(1967).ThediscoveryofGroundedTheory:Strategiesforqualitativeresearch.NewBrunswick,NJ:Aldine/Transaction

Publishers.Glesne,C.(2005).Becomingqualitativeresearchers:Anintroduction(3rded.).Boston,MA:PearsonEducation.Goldenberg,C.(2003).Settingsforschoolimprovement.InternationalJournalofDisability,DevelopmentandEducation,50(1),7-16.doi:

10.1080/1034912032000053304Goldstein,L.S.(1999).Therelationalzone:Theroleofcaringrelationshipsintheco-constructionofmind.AmericanEducationalResearchJournal,

36(3),647-673.Goleman,D.(2000,March-April).Leadershipthatgetsresults.HarvardBusinessReview.Retrievedfromhttps://hbr.org/2000/03/leadership-that-

gets-resultsGross,S.J.(1998).Stayingcentered:Curriculumleadershipinaturbulentera.Alexandria,VA:AssociationforSupervisionandCurriculumDevelopment.Gutiérrez,K.D.,&Rogoff,B.(2003).Culturalwaysoflearning:Individualtraitsorrepertoiresofpractice.EducationalResearcher,32(5),19-25.Hammerness,K.(2001).Teachers'visions:Theroleofpersonalidealsinschoolreform.JournalofEducationalChange,2(2),143-163.doi:

10.1023/A:1017961615264Hargreaves,A.(1994).Changingteachers,changingtimes:Teachers'workandcultureinthepost-modernage.NewYork:TeachersCollegePress.Hargreaves,A.(2008).Thecomingofpost-standardization:Threeweddingsandafuneral.InC.Sugrue(Ed.),Thefutureofeducationalchange:

Internationalperspectives(pp.15–34).London,UK:Routledge.Hargreaves,A.,&Shirley,D.(2009).Thefourthway:Theinspiringfutureforeducationalchange.ThousandOaks,CA:Corwin.Hess,F.(Ed.)(1995).Urbanschoolreform:LessonsfromSanDiego.Cambridge,MA:HarvardEducationPress.Hubbard,L.,Mehan,H.,&SteinM.K.(2006).Reformaslearning:Schoolreform,organizationalculture,andcommunitypoliticsinSanDiego.New

York:Routledge.Jenlink,P.M.,Reigeluth,C.M.,Carr,A.A.,&Nelson,L.M.(1998).Guidelinesforfacilitatingsystemicchangeinschooldistricts.SystemsResearch

andBehavioralScience,15,217-233.doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199805/06)15:3<217::AID-SRES223>3.0.CO;2-NJoyce,B.,&Showers,B.(1982).Thecoachingofteaching.EducationalLeadership,40(1),4-10.Kegan,R.(1983).Theevolvingself:Problemsandprocessinhumandevelopment.Cambridge,MA:HarvardUniversityPress.Kegan,R.(1994).Inoverourheads:Thementaldemandsofmodernlife.Cambridge,MA:HarvardUniversityPress.Khalifa,M.(2012).AreNewedparadigminsuccessfulurbanschoolleadership:Principalascommunityleader.EducationalAdministration

Quarterly,48,424-467.doi:10.1177/0013161X11432922Knapp,M.S.,Copland,M.A.,&Talbert,J.E.(2003).Leadingforlearning:Reflectivetoolsforschoolanddistrictleaders.CTPResearchReport.

Seattle,WA:UniversityofWashington,CenterfortheStudyofTeachingandPolicy.Ladson-Billings,G.(1994).Thedreamkeepers:SuccessfulteachersofAfricanAmericanchildren.SanFrancisco,CA:Jossey-Bass.Ladson-Billings,G.(2001).CrossingovertoCanaan:Thejourneyofnewteachersindiverseclass-rooms.SanFrancisco,CA:Jossey-Bass.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 35

Page 36: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Ladson-Billings,G.(2001).Fightingforourlives:PreparingteacherstoteachAfricanAmericanstudents.JournalofTeacherEducation,51(3),206-214.Lai,K.-W.,&Pratt,K.(2004).Informationandcommunicationtechnology(ICT)insecondaryschools:Theroleofthecomputercoordinator.British

JournalofEducationalTechnology,35(4),461-475.doi:10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00404.xLand,S.M.,&Hannafin,M.J.(1997).Student-centeredlearningenvironments:Foundations,assumptions,andimplications.InstructionalScience,

25(3),167-202.doi:10.1023/A:1002997414652Lewin,K.(1989).Changingasthreesteps:Unfreezing,moving,andfreezingofgroupstandards.InFrench,W.L.,Bell,C.H.,&Zawacki,R.A.(Eds.),

Organizationaldevelopment:Theory,practiceandresearch(3rded.).Homewood,IL:BPI/Irwin.McLaughlin,M.W.(1990).TheRandChangeAgentstudyrevisited:Macroperspectivesandmicrorealities.EducationalResearcher,19(9),11–

16.doi:10.3102/0013189X019009011McLaughlin,M.W.,&Mitra,D.(2001).Theory-basedchangeandchange-basedtheory:Goingdeeper,goingbroader.JournalofEducational

Change,2(4),301-323.doi:10.1023/A:1014616908334McMahon,T.&Thakore,H.(2006).Achievingconstructivealignment:Puttingoutcomesfirst.QualityofHigherEducation,3,10-19.McQuillanP.J.(2008).Small-schoolreformthroughthelensofcomplexitytheory:It's‘goodtothinkwith.’TeachersCollegeRecord,110(9),1772-1801.Miles,M.(2005).Findingkeystoschoolchange:A40-yearodyssey.InA.Lieberman(Ed.),Therootsofeducationalchange:Internationalhandbook

ofeducationalchange(pp.25-57).Dordrecht,Netherlands:Springer.doi:10.1007/1-4020-4451-8_3Moll,L.C.,&Diaz,S.(1987).Changeasthegoalofeducationalresearch.Anthropology&EducationQuarterly,18(4),300-311.doi:

10.1525/aeq.1987.18.4.04x0021uMorrison,K.(2002).Schoolleadershipandcomplexitytheory.London,UK:Routledge.NationalPolicyBoardforEducationalAdministration(2015).Professionalstandardsforeducationalleaders2015.Reston,VA:Author.Neufeld,B.,&Roper,D.(2002).Offtoagoodstart:YearIofcollaborativecoachingandlearningintheEffectivePracticeSchools.Cambridge,MA:

EducationMatters,Inc.Neufeld,B.,&Roper,D.(2003).Coaching:Astrategyfordevelopinginstructionalcapacity:Promisesandpracticalities.Cambridge,MA:Education

Matters,Inc.Newmann,F.M.,&Wehlage,G.G.(1995).Successfulschoolrestructuring:Areporttothepublicandeducators.Madison,WI:Universityof

Wisconsin-Madison,CenteronOrganizationandRestructuringofSchools.Noguera,P.A.(1996).Confrontingtheurbaninurbanschoolreform.TheUrbanReview,28(1),1-19.doi:10.1007/BF02354375Olsen,B.,&Kirtman,L.(2002).Teacherasmediatorofschoolreform:Anexaminationofteacherpracticein36Californiarestructuringschools.

TeachersCollegeRecord,104(2),301-324.doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00164Orr,M.T.,Byrne-Jimenez,M.,McFarlane,P.,&Brown,B.(2005).Leadingoutfromlowperformingschools:Theurbanprincipalexperience.

LeadershipandPolicyinSchools,4(1),23-54.doi:10.1080/15700760590924609Payne,C.M.(2008).Somuchreform,solittlechange:Thepersistenceoffailureinurbanschools.Cambridge,MA:HarvardEducationPress.Peck,K.L.,&Carr,A.A.(1997).Restoringpublicconfidenceinschoolsthroughsystemsthinking.InternationalJournalofEducationalReform,

6(3),316-323.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 36

Page 37: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Perry,A.M.,&Schwam-Baird,M.M.(2010).Schoolbyschool:ThetransformationofNewOrleanspubliceducation.InTheNewOrleansIndexatFive.Washington,DC:BrookingsInstitutionandGreaterNewOrleansCommunityDataCenter.

Ravitch,D.(2010).ThedeathandlifeofthegreatAmericanschoolsystem:Howtestingandchoiceareunderminingeducation.NewYork:BasicBooks.Reigeluth,C.M.(2006).Aleveragedemergentapproachtosystemictransformation.TechTrends,50(2),46–47.Reigeluth,C.M.,Carr-Chellman,A.A.,Beabout,B.R.,&Watson,W.(2006).CreatingsharedvisionsofthefutureofK-12education:Asystemic

transformationprocessforalearner-centeredparadigm.JournalofEducationalAlternatives,2(3),34–66.Reynolds,P.R.(2007).The‘pedagogyoftheoppressed’:Thenecessityofdealingwithproblemsinstudents'lives.EducationalHorizons,86(1),53–60.Rogers,E.M.(2003).Diffusionofinnovations(5thed).NewYork:FreePress.Rudman,L.A.(2004).Sourcesofimplicitattitudes.CurrentDirectionsinPsychologicalScience,13(2),79-82.doi:10.1111/j.0963-

7214.2004.00279.xRussell,G.(2006).Guiltypleasexpectedinbribecase.TheTimes-Picayune.Retrievedfromhttp://www.nola.com/education(accessed7December2006).Sammons,P.(1999).Schooleffectiveness:Comingofageinthe21stcentury.Lisse,Netherlands:Swets&Zeitlinger.Santamaría,L.J.(2009).Culturallyresponsivedifferentiatedinstruction:Narrowinggapsbetweenbestpedagogicalpracticesbenefitingall

learners.TeachersCollegeRecord,111(1),214-247.Santamaría,L.J.,&Thousand,J.A.(2004).Collaboration,co-teaching,anddifferentiatedinstruction:Aprocess-orientedapproachtowhole

schooling.InternationalJournalofWholeSchooling,1(1),13-27.Senge,P.M.(1990).Thefifthdiscipline:Theartandpracticeofthelearningorganization.NewYork:Doubleday/Currency.Spillane,J.P.(2002).Localtheoriesofteacherchange:Thepedagogyofdistrictpoliciesandprograms.TeachersCollegeRecord,104(3),377-

420.doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00167Spillane,J.P.,Halverson,R.,&Diamond,J.B.(2004).Towardatheoryofleadershippractice:Adistributedperspective.JournalofCurriculum

Studies,36(1),3–34.Squire,K.D.,&Reigeluth,C.M.(2000).Themanyfacesofsystemicchange.EducationalHorizons,78(3),143–152.Stein,M.K.,&Coburn,C.E.(2008).Architecturesforlearning:Acomparativeanalysisoftwourbanschooldistricts.AmericanJournalof

Education,114(4),583-626.Stein,M.K.,&D’Amico,L.(2002).Inquiryatthecrossroadsofpolicyandlearning:Astudyofadistrict-wideliteracyinitiative.TeachersCollege

Record,104,1313-1344.Supovitz,J.A.(2006).Thecasefordistrict-basedreform:Leading,building,andsustainingschoolimprovement.Cambridge,MA:HarvardEducationPress.Taylor,R.&Canfield,P.(2007).Learningtobeascholarlyteachingfaculty:Culturalchangethroughsharedleadership.InA.Brew&J.Sachs(Eds.),

Thetransformeduniversity:Scholarshipofteachingandlearninginaction(pp.233-247).Sydney,Australia:SydneyUniversityPress.Tearle,P.(2003).ICTimplementation:Whatmakesthedifference?BritishJournalofEducationalTechnology,34(5),567–583.doi:10.1046/j.0007-

1013.2003.00351.xTomlinson,C.A.(1999).Thedifferentiatedclassroom:Respondingtotheneedsofalllearners.Alexandria,VA:AssociationforSupervisionand

CurriculumDevelopment.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 37

Page 38: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Tomlinson,C.A.(2003).Fulfillingthepromiseofthedifferentiatedclassroom:Strategiesandtoolsforresponsiveteaching.Alexandria,VA:AssociationforSupervisionandCurriculumDevelopment.

Tomlinson,C.A.,&Allan,S.D.(2000).Leadershipfordifferentiatingschoolsandclassrooms.Alexandria,VA:AssociationforSupervisionandCurriculumDevelopment.

Tomlinson,C.A.,Brimijoin,K.,&Narvaez,L.(2008).Thedifferentiatedschool:Makingrevolutionarychangesinteachingandlearning.Alexandria,VA:AssociationforSupervisionandCurriculumDevelopment.

Tomlinson,C.A.,&Kalbfleisch,M.L.(1998).Teachme,teachmybrain:Acallfordifferentiatedclassrooms.EducationalLeadership,56(3),52-55.Tyack,D.B.,&Cuban,L.(1995).TinkeringtowardsUtopia:Acenturyofpublicschoolreform.Cambridge,MA:HarvardUniversityPress.Warren,M.R.(2005).Communitiesandschools:Anewviewofurbaneducationreform.HarvardEducationalReview,75(2),133–173.doi:

10.17763/haer.75.2.m718151032167438Weick,K.E.(1976).Educationalorganizationsaslooselycoupledsystems.AdministrativeScienceQuarterly,21(1),1–19.doi:10.2307/2391875Weimer,M.(2002).Learner-centeredteaching:Fivekeychangestopractice.SanFrancisco,CA:Jossey-Bass.Wenger,E.(1999).Communitiesofpractice:Learning,meaning,andidentity.Cambridge,UK:CambridgeUniversityPress.Wheatley,M.J.(1999).Leadershipandthenewscience:Discoveringorderinachaoticworld(2nded.).SanFrancisco,CA:Berrett-Koehler.Wolcott,H.F.(1973).Themanintheprincipal'soffice:Anethnography.NewYork:Holt,Rinehart,&Winston.Wong,K.K.,Shen,F.X.,Anagnostopoulos,D.,&Rutledge,S.(2007).Theeducationmayor:ImprovingAmerica'sschools.Washington,

DC:GeorgetownUniversityPress.Wright,G.B.(2011).Student-centeredlearninginhighereducation.InternationalJournalofTeachingandLearninginHigherEducation,23(1),92-97.DOMAIN3:PEDAGOGY-ANDRAGOGYAmbrose,S.A.,Bridges,M.W.,DiPietro,M.,Lovett,M.C.,Norman,M.K.,&Mayer,R.E.(2010).Howlearningworks:Sevenresearch-based

principlesforsmartteaching.SanFrancisco,CA:Jossey-Bass.Barr,R.B.,&Tagg,J.(1995).Fromteachingtolearning—Anewparadigmforundergraduateeducation".Change:TheMagazineofHigher

Learning,27(6),12-25.doi:10.1080/00091383.1995.10544672Bloom,B.S.(1956).Taxonomyofeducationalobjectives:Theclassificationofeducationalgoals.Philadelphia,PA:DavidMcKayPublications.Blumenfeld,P.C.,Soloway,E.,Marx,R.W.,Krajcik,J.S.,Guzdial,M.,&Palincsar,A.(1991).Motivatingproject-basedlearning:Sustainingthe

doing,supportingthelearning".EducationalPsychologist,26(3-4),369-398.doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139Bolton,G.E.J.(2010).Reflectivepractice:Writingandprofessionaldevelopment(3rded.).ThousandOaks,CA:SagePublications.Bonwell,C.C.,&Eison,J.A.(1991).Activelearning:Creatingexcitementintheclassroom.ASHE-ERICHigherEducationReportNo.1.Washington,

DC:TheGeorgeWashingtonUniversity,SchoolofEducationandHumanDevelopment.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 38

Page 39: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Bryk,A.S.,Gomez,L.,Grunow,A.,&LeMaheiu,P.(2015).Learningtoimprove:HowAmerica’sschoolscangetbetteratgettingbetter.Cambridge,MA:HarvardEducationPress.

Chickering,A.W.,Gamson,Z.F.(1987).Sevenprinciplesforgoodpracticeinundergraduateeducation.AmericanAssociationofHigherEducationBulletin,3-7.

Chiu,M.M.(2000).Groupproblem-solvingprocesses:Socialinteractionsandindividualactions.JournalfortheTheoryofSocialBehavior,30(1),26-49.doi:10.1111/1468-5914.00118

Cochran-Smith,M.,&Lytle,S.L.(1999).Relationshipsofknowledgeandpractice:Teacherlearningincommunities.ReviewofResearchinEducation.24(1),249-305.doi:10.3102/0091732X024001249.

Cranton,P.(2012).Planninginstructionforadultlearners(3rded.).Toronto,Ontario,Canada:Wall&Emerson.Dillenbourg,P.(1999).Collaborativelearning:Cognitiveandcomputationalapproaches.AdvancesinLearningandInstructionSeries.NewYork:

EmeraldGroupPublishingLimited.Donovan,M.S.,Bransford,J.D.,&Pellegrino,J.W.(1999).Howpeoplelearn:Bridgingresearchandpractice.Washington,DC:NationalAcademyPress.Drago-Severson,E.(2004).Helpingteacherslearn:Principalleadershipforadultgrowthanddevelopment.ThousandOaks,CA:Corwin.Drago-Severson,E.(2016).Useavarietyofpracticestoconnectwithall.JournalofStaffDevelopment,37(1),38-42.Farmer,J.A.,Buckmaster,A.&LeGrand,B.(1992).Cognitiveapprenticeship.NewDirectionsinAdultandContinuingEducation55:41–49.Freeman,S.,Eddy,S.L.,McDonough,M.,Smith,M.K.,Okoroafor,N.,Jordt,H.,&Wenderoth,M.P.(2014).Activelearningincreasesstudent

performanceinscience,engineering,andmathematics.ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciencesoftheU.S.A.,111(23),8410-8415.doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Grabinger,R.S.,&Dunlap,J.C.(1995).Richenvironmentsforactivelearning:Adefinition.ResearchinLearningTechnology,3(2),5-34.doi:10.1080/0968776950030202

GreatSchoolsPartnership(2013).Authenticlearning.Theglossaryofeducationreform.Retrievedfromhttp://edglossary.org/authentic-learningHansman,C.A.(2001).Context-basedadultlearning.NewDirectionsforAdultandContinuingEducation,2001(89),43-52.Hansman,C.A.(2017).Adultlearningtheoriesinmentoringrelationshipsandmodels.InV.C.X.Wang(Ed.),Theoryandpracticeofadultand

highereducation.Charlotte,NC:InformationAgePublishing.Heifetz,R.A.,&Linsky,M.(2002).Leadershipontheline:Stayingalivethroughthedangersofleading.Cambridge,MA:HarvardBusinessReviewPress.Jentz,B.(2007).Talksense:Communicatingtoleadandlearn.Acton,MA:ResearchforBetterTeaching.Kirschner,P.A.,Sweller,J.,&Clark,R.E.(2006).Whyminimalguidanceduringinstructiondoesnotwork:Ananalysisofthefailureof

constructivist,discovery,problem-based,experiential,andinquiry-basedteaching.EducationalPsychologist,41(2),75-86.doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

Knowles,M.S.(1980).Themodernpracticeofadulteducation:Frompedagogytoandragogy.NewYork:Cambridge,TheAdultEducationCompany.Kozulin,A.(2003).Vygotsky’seducationaltheoryinculturalcontext.Cambridge,UK:CambridgeUniversityPress.Ladson-Billings,G.(2006).Fromtheachievementgaptotheeducationdebt:UnderstandingachievementinU.S.schools.EducationalResearcher,

35(7),3-12.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 39

Page 40: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Lipton,L.,&Wellman,B.(2007).Howtotalksoteacherslisten.EducationalLeadership,65(1),30-34.Loughran,J.J.(2002).Effectivereflectivepractice:Insearchofmeaninginlearningaboutteaching.JournalofTeacherEducation.53(1):33-43.doi:

10.1177/0022487102053001004Mann,R.S.,Abbas,A.,Kohl,H.,Orth,R.,Görmer,M.(2010).Globalsurveyonbusinessimprovementandbenchmarking.GlobalBenchmarkingNetwork.McKinney,K.(2010).Activelearning.IllinoisStateUniversity,CenterforTeaching,Learning&Technology.Archivedfromtheoriginalon2011-09-11.Merriam,S.B.,&Bierema,L.L.(2014).Adultlearning:Linkingtheoryandpractice.SanFrancisco,CA:Jossey-Bass.Mezirow,J.,Taylor,E.W.,&Associates(2009).Transformativelearninginpractice:Insightsfromcommunity,workplace,andhighereducation.

SanFrancisco,CA:Jossey-Bass.Milner,H.R.,IV(2010).Startwhereyouare,butdon'tstaythere:Understandingdiversity,opportunitygaps,andteachingintoday'sclassrooms.

Cambridge,MA:HarvardEducationPress.Mitnik,R.,Recabarren,M.,Nussbaum,M.,&Soto,A.(2009).Collaborativeroboticinstruction:Agraphteachingexperience.Computers&

Education,53(2),330-342.Mullainathan,S.(2015,January3).Racialbias,evenwhenwehavegoodintentions.TheNewYorkTimes.Retrievedfrom

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/04/upshot/the-measuring-sticks-of-racial-bias-.htmlO’Dell,C.,&C.J.Grayson(1998).Ifonlyweknewwhatweknow:Identificationandtransferofinternalbestpractices.CaliforniaManagement

Review,40(3),154–174.Peterson,L.(2007).Authenticlearningenvironments.ETEC510Wiki,UniversityofBritishColumbia.RetrievedSeptember26,2017

fromhttp://etec.ctlt.ubc.ca/510wiki/Authentic_Learning_EnvironmentsPrince,M.(2004).Doesactivelearningwork?Areviewoftheresearch.JournalofEngineeringEducation,93(3),223-231.Renkl,A.,Atkinson,R.K.,Maier,U.H.,&Staley,R.(2002).Fromexamplestudytoproblemsolving:Smoothtransitionshelplearning.Journalof

ExperimentalEducation,70(4),293-315.Schön,D.A.(1983).Thereflectivepractitioner:Howprofessionalsthinkinaction.NewYork:BasicBooks.Shuell,T.J.(1986).Cognitiveconceptionsoflearning.ReviewofEducationalResearch,56(4),411-436.Steele,C.M.(2011).WhistlingVivaldi:Howstereotypesaffectusandwhatwecando.NewYork:W.W.Norton&Company.Taylor,E.W.(2008).Transformativelearningtheory.InS.Merriam(Ed.),Thirdupdateonadultlearningtheory.NewDirectionsforAdultand

ContinuingEducation,2008(119),5-16.doi:10.1002/ace.301Vygotsky,L.S.(1978).Interactionbetweenlearninganddevelopment.InL.S.Vygotsky&M.Cole,Mindinsociety:Thedevelopmentofhigher

psychologicalprocesses.Cambridge,MA:HarvardUniversityPress.Welsh,J.F.,&Metcalf,J.(2010).Administrativesupportforinstitutionaleffectivenessactivities:responsestothe‘newaccountability.’Journalof

HigherEducationPolicyandManagement,25(2).Wright,M.C.,Goldwasser,M.,Jacobson,W.,&Dakes,C.(2017).Assessmentfromaneducationaldevelopmentperspective.ToImprovethe

Academy,36,39–49.doi:10.1002/tia2.20051

© Education Development Center, Inc. 40

Page 41: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Yew,E.H.J.,&Schmidt,H.G.(2012).Whatstudentslearninproblem-basedlearning:Aprocessanalysis.InstructionalScience,40(2),371-95.doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9181-6

DOMAIN4:CLINICALPRACTICEAnast-May,L.,Buckner,B.,&Geer,G.(2011).Redesigningprincipalinternships:Practicingprincipals’perspectives.InternationalJournalof

EducationalLeadershipPreparation,6(1),1-7.Billitteri,T.J.(2009).Thevalueofacollegeeducation:Isafour-yeardegreetheonlypathtoasecurefuture?CQResearcher,19(41),981-1004.Bradshaw,L.K.,Perreault,G.,McDowelle,J.O.,&Bell,E.W.(1997,November).Evaluatingtheresultsofinnovativepracticesineducational

leadershipprograms.PaperpresentedattheannualconferenceoftheSouthernRegionalCouncilforEducationalAdministration,Charleston,SC.

Bridge.jobs(n.d.).Employerguidetostructuringasuccessfulinternshipprogram.AcollaborativeeffortofallofRhodeIsland’scollegesanduniversities.Retrievedfromhttp://career.bryant.edu/resources/files/RI%20Employer%20Guide%20Good%20Internships%20are%20Good%20Business2%20(3).pdf

Burns,M.K.,Aitkenhead,J.M.,Frederick,C.M.,&Huddy,S.(2013).Undergraduateinternshipexpectations:Strategicencouragementofstudentinvolvement.InquiriesJournal/StudentPulse,5(12),1-2.Retrievedfromhttp://www.inquiriesjournal.com/a?id=838

Chance,E.W.(1990).Theadministrativeinternship:Effectiveprogramcharacteristics.PaperpresentedattheannualmeetingoftheNationalCouncilofProfessorsofEducationalAdministration,LosAngeles,CA.

Chandler,M.,Chan,T.C.,&Jiang,B.(2013).Theeffectivenessofanembeddedapproachtopracticumexperiencesineducationalleadership:Programcandidates’perspectives.InternationalJournalofTeachingandLearninginHigherEducation,25(1),79-91.

D’Abate,C.P.,Youndt,M.A.,&Wenzel,K.E.(2009).Makingthemostofaninternship:Anempiricalstudyofinternshipsatisfaction.AcademyofManagementLearning&Education,8(4),527-539.

Deal,T.E.,&Kennedy,A.A.(1982).Corporatecultures:Theritesandritualsofcorporatelife.NewYork:BasicBooks.Dewey,J.(1997).Experienceandeducation.NewYork:FreePress.Fain,P.(2017,June14).Newmoneyandnewplayersonapprenticeships.InsideHigherEd.Retrievedfrom

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/06/14/white-house-apprenticeship-push-will-include-funding-and-focus-alternative-providersFreestone,R.,Williams,P.,Thompson,S.,&Trembath,K.(2007).Aquantitativeapproachtoassessmentofwork-basedlearningoutcomes:An

urbanplanningapplication.HigherEducationResearch&Development,26(4),347-361.Fry,B.,Bottoms,G.,&O’Neill,K.(2005).Challengetoleadseries:Theprincipalinternship:Howcanwegetitright?Atlanta,GA:SouthernRegional

EducationBoard.Hoffman,N.(2011).Schoolingintheworkplace:Howsixoftheworld’sbestvocationaleducationsystemsprepareyoungpeopleforjobsandlife.

Cambridge,MA:HarvardEducationPress.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 41

Page 42: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Hora,M.T.,Wolfgram,M.,&Thompson,S.(2017).Whatdoweknowabouttheimpactofinternshipsonstudentoutcomes?Resultsfromapreliminaryreviewofthescholarlyandpractitionerliteratures.CenterforResearchonCollege-WorkforceTransitionsResearchBrief#2.Retrievedfromhttp://ccwt.wceruw.org/documents/CCWT-report-Designing-Internship-Programs.pdf

Kolb,A.Y.,&Kolb,D.A.(2005).Learningstylesandlearningspaces:Enhancingexperientiallearninginhighereducation.AcademyofManagementLearning&Education,4(2),193-212.

Mitgang,L.(2012).Themakingoftheprincipal:Fivelessonsinleadershiptraining.NewYork:TheWallaceFoundation.NationalAssociationofCollegesandEmployers(2011).Positionstatement:U.S.internships.Retrievedfromwww.naceweb.org/advocacy/position-

statements/united-states-internships.aspxO’Neill,N.(2010).Internshipsasahigh-impactpractice:Somereflectionsonquality.PeerReview,12(4),4–8.Orton,J.D.,&Weick,K.E.(1990).Looselycoupledsystems:Areconceptualization.AcademyofManagementReview,15(2),203-223.Pounder,D.,&Crow,G.(2005).Sustainingthepipelineofschooladministrators.EducationalLeadership,62(8),56-60.Resnick,L.B.(1987).The1987presidentialaddresslearninginschoolandout.EducationalResearcher,16(9),13-54.Schein,E.H.(1985).Organizationalcultureandleadership.SanFrancisco,CA:Jossey-Bass.Silva,P.,Lopes,B.,Costa,M.,Melo,A.I.,Dias,G.P.,Brito,E.,&Seabra,D.(2016).Themillion-dollarquestion:Caninternshipsboostemployment?

StudiesinHigherEducation,1-20.True,M.(n.d.).Startingandmaintainingaqualityinternshipprogram.Retrievedfrom

https://www.binghamton.edu/ccpd/employers/documents/starting-maintaining-quality-internship-programlo.pdfUniversityofNotreDame,TheCareerCenter(n.d.).Internships:Anemployer’sguidetodevelopinganinternshipprogram.Retrievedfrom

https://careercenter.nd.edu/assets/136851/employer_internship_development_guide.pdfUniversityofWisconsin,SchoolofBusiness,BusinessCareerCenter(n.d.).Designingasuccessfulinternshipprogram.Retrievedfrom

https://bus.wisc.edu/~/media/bus/recruit-hire/internship_guide.ashxWalker,S.(2017).StateofWisconsin:Budgetinbrief.Madison,WI:DivisionofExecutiveBudgetandFinance,DepartmentofAdministration.

Retrievedfromhttp://doa.wi.gov/Documents/DEBF/Budget/Biennial%20Budget/2017-19%20Executive%20Budget/17-19%20BIB%20FINAL%20revised%2002082017.pdf

Westerberg,C.,&Wickersham,C.(2011).Internshipshavevalue,whetherornotstudentsarepaid.TheChronicleofHigherEducation.Retrievedfromhttp://www.chronicle.com/article/Internships-Have-Value/127231/

DOMAIN5:PERFORMANCEASSESSMENTBennett,R.E.(2011).Formativeassessment:Acriticalreview.AssessmentinEducation:Principles,Policy&Practice,18(1),5-25.doi:

10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678Biggs,J.,&Tang,C.(2011).Teachingforqualitylearningatuniversity:Whatthestudentdoes(4thed.).NewYork:McGraw-HillEducation.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 42

Page 43: Principal Preparation Program Self-Study Toolkit for use in … Rubrics... · 2017. 12. 7. · QM Self-Study Toolkit Introduction and Overview Education Development Center, Inc.,

QMSelf-StudyToolkit

Black,P.,&McCormick,R.(2010).Reflectionsandnewdirections.Assessment&EvaluationinHigherEducation,34(5),493-499.Black,P.,&Wiliam,D.(1998).Assessmentandclassroomlearning.AssessmentinEducation,5(1),7-74.doi:10.1080/0969595980050102Dunn,K.E.,&Mulvenon,S.W.(2009).Acriticalreviewofresearchonformativeassessments:Thelimitedscientificevidenceoftheimpactof

formativeassessmentsineducation.PracticalAssessment,Research&Evaluation,14(7).Retrievedfromhttp://pareonline.net/pdf/v14n7.pdf

Howard,T.C.(2003).Culturallyrelevantpedagogy:Ingredientsforcriticalteacherreflection.TheoryintoPractice,42(3),195-202.Stiggins,R.J.(2002).Assessmentcrisis:TheabsenceofassessmentFORlearning.PhiDeltaKappan,83(10),758-765.Stiggins,R.J.(2005).FromformativeassessmenttoassessmentFORlearning:Apathtosuccessinstandards-basedschools.PhiDeltaKappan,

87(4),324-328.Retrievedfromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/20441998DOMAIN6:GRADUATEPERFORMANCEOUTCOMESDaloisio,J.(2017).Principalchurn:Acasestudyonprincipalturnoverandstrategiestobuildsustainabilityandcontinuity(Doctoraldissertation).

Retrievedfromhttp://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/33237/Goldring,R.,&Taie,S.(2014).Principalattritionandmobility:Resultsfromthe2012–13PrincipalFollow-upSurvey(NCES2014-064rev).

Washington,DC:U.S.DepartmentofEducation,NationalCenterforEducationStatistics.Retrievedfromhttp://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch(accessed2017October)

Spady,W.G.(1994).Outcome-basededucation:Criticalissuesandanswers.Arlington,VA:AmericanAssociationofSchoolAdministrators.

© Education Development Center, Inc. 43