PRINCIPAL’S MESSAGE

Spiritually, it is believed that the life on the earth is regulated by the

laws of the Lord or Divinity. It is the ‘rule of law’ that draws the essential

difference between human society and the animal world. The legal

education plays an important role in promoting the social justice as Law

professionals are characterized as ‘Social Engineers’. Our College is

greatly revered for organising National Level Moot Court Competitions &

Client Counselling Competitions and this year we have decided to

combine it together into a Law Festival. Thus, it gives me immense

pleasure to introduce our National Level Law Fest – Legis Centrum.

K. C. Law College, Mumbai was established under the aegis of the HSNC

Board. Over the years, it has been recognized and ranked as one of the

leading law Colleges in the country.

It is said unique ideas and thoughts cannot be inherited and taught.

Thoughts give birth to a creative force that is neither elemental nor sidereal.

When mind comes together it catalyzes great thoughts and creates a unique

experience which is ‘Legis Centrum’. The Fest is aimed to develop

knowledge, awareness of legal implications, communications and

management skills etc. of all the students. I hope that this Fest would be

much information and fruitful to all participants, since it will give an

opportunities for students to develop their level of confidence to work in

any kind of environment.

I cordially invite you all to participate in this National Level Law Fest and

welcome you all to join in our celebrations and share your ideas and

knowledge of law to make this event a grand success.

Dr. Kavita Lalchandani Principal

ABOUT K. C. LAW COLLEGE

Kishinchand Chellaram Law College, popularly known as K.C.Law College,

is one of the premier law institutions in the city of Mumbai imparting legal

education since 1955. It is permanently affiliated to University of Mumbai

and recognized under Section 2(f) and 12 (B) of UGC Act.

Bearing in mind that law is an instrument of social change; the College has

adopted a motto which says „Law is the King of Kings‟. The aim of K. C. Law

College is to promote excellence in legal studies and its mission is to provide

legal knowledge through theory and practice and to make the study of law

socially relevant and fruitful. The College is ranked 10th at National Level

and 4th in the State of Maharashtra as amongst Top Law School of

Outstanding Excellence by Competition Success Review – June 2018 issue.

ABOUT the fest

K. C. Law College is extremely happy to host its National Level Law Fest –

‘Legis Centrum’. As the name suggest „Centre of Law‟ which mean that

through law a bridge between the common man and the government can be

build.

The objective of the fest is to enhance skills of the students and to give them

stimulated experience in varied areas of the legal profession. Through this

fest the aim is to improve the competitive spirit in an innovative process of

mind and deal with learning aspects of legal education. The events in the

fest are designed in such a way that different facts of learning are

highlighted and it will be an ecstacy to discover so many talents amongst

the students.

The events of the law fiesta are:

1) 14th National Client Counselling Competition

2) Letter to the Chief Justice Competition

3) 13th National Level Moot Court Competition

14th NATIONAL CLIENT COUNSELLING

Date: Saturday, 23rd & 24th March, 2019

COMPETITION FORMAT & RULES:

1. Each team consisting of two student participants would be allotted a

room for interview and counselling. Here the team will conduct themselves

as advocates in a lawyer‟s chamber. The client will be a person trained by

the organizers and would consult the team with a problem. The team is

required to elicit all relevant information from the client by interviewing or

questioning the client and then counsel the client.

2. All teams will be pre-assigned a letter designation (A, B, C… etc) by the

organizer by drawing of lots.

a) The Consultation (Interview Period): All teams will go through a 30-

minutes session. The first 20-minutes are devoted to consultation

with the client during which the team is expected to elicit the

relevant information, outline the problem and propose a solution or

other means of resolving the problem. (Refer Judging Standards).

During the consultation and the post- consultation, the team may

use books, notes, files and other materials.

b) Post - Consultation (Post Interview Period): During the 10-minutes

post-consultation the participants in the team may talk loudly to

each other loud enough to be overheard by the Judges. The post-

consultation performance may summarize the interview, indicate

the scope of legal work to be undertaken, and state the legal issues

that should be researched.

3. The Judges may penalize the students who allow the interview sessions to

run beyond the 20-minute period allotted in the rules. However the

judges in their discretion, taking into account the circumstances, may

allow some time beyond the 20 minutes period for the interview. If

extended this circumstance will be taken into consideration by the judges

in making their decision. If the 20 minutes period is exceeded the team in

no circumstances will be given more than 35 minutes to complete both

tasks (Consultation and Post-Consultation). Judges will stop the

students after 35 – minutes regardless of whether the team is in

Consultation or Post-Consultation process.

4. There will be one elimination round for each participating team in one

room with one panel of judges. The judges can discuss with the team their

performance. The judges will individually rank the teams. Team with the

highest scores will be qualified for the semi-final round. Two top scoring

teams of semi-final round will be selected for the final round.

RULES:

1. This Competition is open to students pursuing their Bachelor‟s degree in

the current calendar year i.e. 2018 – 19 in a three-year course or five years

course in law from any recognized School/ College/ University in India. The

students should be deputed by their respective colleges.

2. Each Law College/School/University may send one team consisting of two

students. Students undergoing master‟s course or research in law are not

entitled to participate.

3. Each team will have a 30 minutes session. The first 20 minutes are

devoted to the interview with the client (consultation), during which time the

team is expected to elicit the relevant information, outline the problem and

make suggestion for its resolution.

4. During the 10 minutes post interview period (post consultation), the

participants of the team should discuss the interview with each other,

within the hearing of the judges, using the opportunity to assess the

interview and discuss future strategies for dealing with the client‟s

problems. The judges may question the team within this period and may use

anything in this period to assist them in their judging.

5. The judges may penalize teams who exceed the time limits.

6. i. In order to preserve anonymity each team will be identified to the judges

only by a number or letter, which will be allotted to each team by the

organizers.

ii. Teams that have conducted the interview will be segregated from those

who have not yet participated.

iii. Any interaction among the competing teams once the rounds have

started will be considered as misconduct and the teams may be disqualified.

7. All teams will have the same problem.

8. The organizers will arrange their own time-keepers, who will ring a

warning bell at the end of 15 minutes and 8 minutes followed by a final bell

at the end of 20 minutes and 10 minutes of the Consultation and Post

Consultation respectively.

9. Each judge will evaluate for a maximum of 100 marks independently. The

scores of each judge will be added up and then listed according to their

scoring. The decision of the judges will be final and binding.

10. The organizers reserve the right to amend or modify the rules and

regulations.

11. The last date for receiving the entries will be 9th March, 2019.

JUDGING STANDARDS:

1. Establishing the working atmosphere: Whether the participants

established the beginning of an effective professional relationship and

working atmosphere and at an appropriate point oriented the client to

the special nature of the relationship in a courteous, sensitive and

professional manner.

2. Description of the problem: Whether the participants learned how the

client viewed his or her situation, using a combination of listening and

questioning ability, drawing out both information and feelings, as

appropriate, to develop a reasonably complete and reliable description of

the problem and reflecting this understanding to the client.

3. Client’s goals, expectations and needs: Whether the participants

learned the client‟s goals and initial expectations and modified or

developed them as necessary, giving attention in doing so to all aspects of

the problem.

4. Problem Analysis: Whether the participants analyzed the client‟s

problem with creativity and both legal and non-legal perspectives,

resulting in a clear and useful formulation of the problem by asking

specific relevant questions.

5. Legal analysis and Legal advice: Legal analysis and the consequent

legal advice given should be both accurate and appropriate to the

situation and its context. Consistence with analysis of the client‟s

problem develops a set of potential and feasible alternatives, if any, both

legal and non-legal.

6. Client’s informed choice: Whether the participants having developed a

set of potentially effective and feasible alternatives assist the client in

making an informed choice. Potential legal, economic, social and

psychological consequences should be taken into account.

7. Effective conclusion: Whether the participants concluded the interview

skillfully, and left the client with feeling of reasonable confidence and

understanding, with appropriate reassurance, and with a clear sense of

specific explanation and mutual obligations to follow.

8. Teamwork: Whether the participants as collaborating counselors,

worked together as a team, with flexibility and an appropriate balance of

participation.

9. Professional and ethical relationship throughout the

interview: Whether the participants developed an appropriate balance in

dealing with the legal and emotional needs of the client.

10. De-briefing (Post Interview Reflection): Whether the participants,

during the post consultation time, gave evidence of having recognized

their own and the client‟s feelings; the strengths and limitations of their

interviewing skills, their handling of substantive aspects of the client‟s

problems (both legal and non-legal), the quality and the appropriateness,

of their advice and provided for an effective follow-up.

For any further clarifications or queries kindly contact:

Faculty Co-ordinator – Dr. Bindu Variath - 09869329967

Student Co-ordinator – Mr. Keshav Tripathi - 09967797003

Assistant Student Co-ordinator – Ms. Prerna Israni - 09167289865

Assistant Student Co-ordinator – Mr. Darshil Jhaveri - 099699954955

LETTER TO THE CHIEF JUSTICE COMPETITION

Date: 23rd March, 2019

“Letter to the Chief Justice” Competition is an event which is inspired by

cases where concerned members of civil society in India wrote to the Chief

Justices of various High Courts or the Supreme Court, on Inland Letters or

post cards, to draw attention to pressing issues. These letters were later

converted into writ Petitions/SLPs. One such case is that of D. K. Basu and

Others v/s State of West Bengal & Others, wherein D. K. Basu attached a

newspaper article to an inland letter and sent it to the Chief Justice of

Calcutta High Court, to bring light to the issue of custodial deaths. On

similar line, we have conceived this event, which entails writing a letter to

the Chief Justice of India on an inland letter.

General Rules:

1) Each team will comprise of 2 participants.

2) The topic for the letter will be disclosed 15 minutes before the start of the

competition, at the venue.

3) A blank Inland Letter will be provided to the participants at the time of

the competition.

4) The letter should be hand written in English.

5) Participating teams should enter only their team code in the space

provided for the address on Inland Letter provided to them.

6) The time allotted to write the letter will be 1 hour.

Guidelines for writing the letter:

1) Avoid excessive use of legal terms. Participants should keep in mind that

this is a method of appeal used by the common man.

2) Clean and legible handwriting is welcome.

3) The letter should be formulated so as to emphasize the larger public

interest of the given topic.

Faculty Co-ordinator – Mrs. Poornima Joshi - 09082971711

Student Co-ordinator – Ms. Farzeen Khambatta - 09619190714

Assistant Student Co-ordinator – Mr. Kshitij Wadhwani - 0976239477

13th NATIONAL LEVEL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2019

Moot Court Problem

Akash Talreja has businesses across five countries which requires him to

travel frequently. His wife, Tina Talreja is a former super model and

socialite. After three years of marriage, Akash was desirous of having a

child. However, the couple was unable to have a child. On seeking medical

advice and after medical examination, it was learned that due to a genetic

condition, Tina was infertile and would not be able to carry the baby.

As Akash continued to be keen to have a child, Akash and Tina sought the

assistance of medical experts at ISK fertility clinic. Akash and Tina were

advised that they could opt for surrogacy and the surrogate mother would

also be the egg donor. Akash and Tina completed all the formalities and

agreed to bear all the medical and other expenses involved. Anjali Menon,

the proposed surrogate, was contacted and treatment commenced. Akash

and Tina would regularly contact Anjali to enquire about her health and the

health of the baby. After seven months and one week of the pregnancy,

Akash and Tina informed ISK fertility clinic and Anjali that they had

divorced and were no longer desirous of going ahead with the pregnancy.

While they did not disclose the reasons leading upto their divorce, they

stated that as a result of their divorce, they may not now be able to provide

an environment conducive to the well-being of the baby. As the eighth

month had commenced and it was a matter of weeks before the child would

be born, it was uncertain what effect such termination of pregnancy would

have on the health of Anjali. On 1st January, 2019, Baby Q was born in

Bluebell Hospital. Both, Akash and Tina refused to take Baby Q. Baby Q

continues to be in the care of the Bluebell Hospital.

Baby Q, through Anjali, ISK fertility clinic and Bluebell Hospital have jointly

filed a public interest litigation against Akash, Tina and the State to not only

protect the rights of Baby Q but also to seek the intervention of the highest

court in framing guidelines to protect and ensure that no more babies suffer

the same fate as Baby Q.

Issues framed

(a) Do Anjali Menon, ISK fertility clinic and Bluebell Hospital have the locus

to file this petition?

(b) Were Akash and Tina justified in requesting termination of pregnancy in

the eighth month on the ground of their divorce?

(c) Was ISK fertility clinic justified in rejecting Akash and Tina's request on

the ground of Anjali's health being possibly at risk?

(d) Are there guidelines presently in place to protect and provide for a baby

born of surrogacy whose parents refuse to take custody of such baby after

her/his birth?

Rules & Regulations of the National Level Moot Court

Competition

I. DEFINITIONS

1. The following terms shall have the corresponding meanings unless

otherwise provided.

1.1. „Competition‟ shall refer to 13th National Level Moot Court Competition,

2019.

1.2. „Competition Problem‟ shall refer to the compendium of facts and

issues released by the organizers of the Competition with its clarifications

and corrections.

1.3. „Competition Rules‟ shall refer to the official rules of the Competition as

amended from time to time.

1.4. The Preliminary Round shall be based on Merit, the Semi – Final shall

be based on Knock-out round‟ & the Final Round of Moot Court Competition

shall be based on „Merit‟.

1.5. „Memorial‟ shall refer to the memorandum of written submissions

submitted by any participating team as per the Competition Rules.

1.7. „Official Email‟ shall refer to the official email id of the K.C. Law College

Moot Court Association i.e. kclc.legiscentrum@gmail.com

II. GENERAL RULES

1. Eligibility

1.1. Students pursuing their Bachelor‟s degree in the current calendar year

i.e. 2018-19 in a three-year course or five years course in law from any

recognized School/ College/ University in India are eligible to participate in

the competition.

1.2. Each participating team shall comprise of three members wherein two

(2) members, shall be designated as Speakers and one (1) member as

Researcher. No change in the names of participants shall be permitted after

the last date of registration, except at the sole discretion of the organizers.

1.3. No team shall contradict the composition mentioned above. No faculty

member, coach, or a designated observer will be allowed to accompany the

team.

2. Clarifications regarding the Moot Problem

2.1. Teams may request for clarifications via e-mail to

kclc.legiscentrum@gmail.com latest by 27th February, 2019 till 23:59

hours.

2.2. All responses to clarifications will be sent via email to the registered

Email IDs of the teams by 28th February, 2019 till 23:59 hours.

3. Dress Code

3.1. Western formals (white shirt, black trousers, black tie, black blazer,

and black shoes for gentlemen); and

3.2. Western (White shirt, black trousers, black blazer, and black shoes) or

Indian (Punjabi dress –white kurta and white/black churidar/salwar with or

without dupatta [white or black] and black shoes) formals for ladies.

4. Language

4.1. The Competition shall be held in the English language ONLY.

5. Memorandum

5.1. Each team participating in the Competition must prepare a

memorandum on behalf of the Plaintiff and on the behalf of the Respondent.

5.1.1.Each team shall at the time of submission, must submit a soft copy in

Portable Document Format (.PDF extension) and in Word format (.DOC

extension) via email to kclc.legiscentrum@gmail.com on or before 14th

March, 2019, 23:59 hours with subject line stating “Memorials for Team

(Mention College Name)”.

5.1.2.Teams must further submit 4 hard copies of the Memorial (in respect

of the Plaintiff/Petitioner/Appellant and Defendant/Respondent) on or

before 15th March, 2019, 17:00 hours to the following address:

5.1.3. Participants must carry a minimum of 2 copies of Memorials (in

respect of Plaintiff and Respondent) for the Judges on the day of the Moot

Court Competition.

5.1.4. Participants may also create and provide Case Compendiums;

however, they must get extra copies for the judges by themselves.

5.2. Any memorial submitted after the deadline shall be subject to penalty

for late submission.

5.3. The participating teams shall be allotted a „Team Code‟ after the

registration. Teams „shall not reveal identity‟ in any form, except the Team

Code allotted to them during the Competition. Names of participants or

name of College of the teams concerned must not appear on or within the

Memorial.

5.4. The Memorial must contain the following parts only:

5.4.1. Cover Page;

5.4.2. Table of Contents;

5.4.3. List of Abbreviations;

5.4.4. Index of Authorities;

5.4.5. Statement of Jurisdiction;

5.4.6. Statement of Facts;

5.4.7. Questions Presented;

5.4.8. Summary of Pleadings;

5.4.9. Written Submission/Arguments Advanced/Pleadings

5.4.10. Prayer

5.5. Content Specification

5.5.1. Cover Page - The front cover of each Memorial must have the following

information: The Team Code on the upper right-hand corner followed by „P‟

for Memorial on behalf of the Plaintiff/Petitioner and „R‟ for Memorandum on

behalf of the Respondent (e.g., Team allotted code number 23 shall write

„TCP23‟ on the top right hand corner of the front cover of its Memorial for

the Plaintiff and „TCR23‟ of the Memorial for the Respondent);

The name of the court;

The year of the Competition (the year during which the relevant Round takes

place, for instance, 13th National Level Moot Court Competition, 2019);

The name of the case; and The title of the document (i.e., „Memorandum on

behalf of the Plaintiff/Petitioner‟ or „Memorandum on behalf of the

Respondent‟);

5.5.2. Index of Authorities

The Index of Authorities must list all legal authorities cited in any part of

the Memorial and must indicate the page number(s) of the Memorial on

which each authority is cited.

5.5.3. Citation

Footnotes must be used to identify the source of statements or propositions

made in the pleadings of the Memorial. Endnotes are not permitted. The use

of footnotes must be restricted to pleadings only. Font size should be

restricted to 10, Times New Roman, with single spacing.

5.5.4. Length

The total length of the Memorial including the Statement of Jurisdiction,

Statement of Facts, Questions Presented, Summary of Arguments, Written

Submission and Prayer must not exceed 30 pages.

5.5.5. Presentation of Memorial

The following colour schemes shall be followed for marking of the separate

cover pages containing the Memorial: Plaintiff/Petitioner- BLUE and

Respondent – RED.

5.5.6.Scoring of the Memorandum

Sr. No.

Marking Criteria Marks allocated

1. Knowledge of Law & Extent of Research

20

2. Application and appreciation of facts

10

3. Evidence of Original Thought 10

4. Grammar & Style 20

5. Correct Format & Citation 20

6. Proper and Articulate Analysis,

Clarity and Organization

20

Total 100

5.5.7 Formatting Specifications

The Memorials shall be formatted according to the following specifications:

i. Typed on standard A4 size page

ii. Font type: Times New Roman

iii. Font size for body text: 12; the text of the written submission must have

one and a half spacing

iv. Font size for footnotes: 10; text of footnotes may be single-spaced

however two separate footnotes must be double spaced

v. Margin: 1 inch margin on each side of the A4 size page

vi. Quotations of sources outside of the memorial of fifty words or more in

any part of the memorial shall be block quoted and must be in italics.

The footnotes must follow the Bluebook format of citation.

6. Procedure of Oral Rounds

6.1. Oral presentations during the round must be made by two (2)

members. Each Team must indicate to the bailiff how it wishes to allocate

it‟s given time for each round among (a) its first speaker, (b) its second

speaker.

6.2. Time allocated for but not used by one speaker may not be used by

another speaker, or in the rebuttal or sur-rebuttal.

6.3. Scope of Pleadings

A team's oral pleadings are not in any way limited to the scope of the

Team's Memorial. The scope of the Plaintiff's rebuttal is limited to

responding to the Respondent's primary oral pleadings, and the scope of the

Respondent's sur-rebuttal is limited to responding to the Plaintiff's rebuttal.

If the Plaintiff waive off its right to rebut, Respondent may not appear for

sur-rebuttal.

Marking Criteria for Speakers

The criterion for scoring of the Speakers has been given herein below:

Sr. No.

Marking Criteria Marks allocated

1. Knowledge of pertinent Laws 20

2. Application of Laws 20

3. Proficiency and adeptness in answering questions

20

4. Style, Poise, Courtesy and Demeanor 10

5. Use of relevant Case Laws 10

6. Reference to Memorials 10

6. Organization and flow of Arguments 10

Total 100

7.4.4. Court Room Communication

Written communication during the Oral Round shall be limited to written

communication among team members seated at the counsel table. No other

written communication may take place.

Participants seated at the Counsel‟s table may use laptops or electronic

gadgets in the courtroom but must ensure that this does not interfere with

the court proceedings. The use of laptops or electronic gadgets are not

permitted in the Semi-Final and Final Round.

7.4.5. Scouting

Team members or persons directly affiliated with any Team may only

attend preliminary rounds in which their team is competing. Violation of

this rule should be brought to the attention of the court room officers

immediately, without disturbing the oral round, or immediately after the

oral round has finished. A team which commits scouting in any form shall

be disqualified from the competition.

III. STRUCTURE OF THE COMPETITION

The Competition shall consist of the following:

1. Researcher‟s Test*

2. The Preliminary Rounds;

3. The Semi Final Round; and

4. The Final Round

1. Researcher‟s Test

The Researcher‟s Test will be conducted via Multiple Choice Questions and

shall be held on the day of the Competition, i.e. Sunday 24th March, 2019.

Note: The side on which the team will be arguing will be decided by a draw

of lots, with the teams picking the lots. The teams will be provided with a

hard copy of the memorandum of their opponent‟s Written Submission prior

to the oral rounds. They are required to return the same after their rounds.

2. Preliminary Rounds

2.1. In the preliminary rounds, each team shall argue only once either as

the Plaintiff/Petitioner or Respondent. The draw of lots for determining the

Opponent teams shall be conducted after registration. No team shall be

provided any information regarding the identity of their opponent teams or

any other team under any circumstances.

2.2. The time limit for Preliminary round shall be Twenty (20) minutes for

each team. This shall include the submission of both the student counsels

from the team. Each student counsel shall argue for a minimum five (5)

minutes for their oral submission.

2.3. The team appearing from the Plaintiff/Petitioner will be given five (5)

minutes for rebuttal after the Respondent team completes their arguments

and rebuttals. One speaker from each team will be permitted to rebut.

2.4. The team appearing from the side of the Respondent will have to rebut

during their arguments. They will be given five (5) minutes in addition to the

allotted fifteen (15) minutes for their oral submission. Each student counsel

shall argue for a minimum five (5) minutes for their oral submission.

3. Semi - Final Round

3.1. The time limit for Semi-Final Round shall be twenty five (25) minutes

for each team. This shall include the submission of both the student

counsels from the team. Each student counsel shall argue for a minimum

thirteen (13) minutes for their oral submissions.

3.2. The team appearing from the Plaintiff/Petitioner will be given five (5)

minutes for rebuttal after the Respondent team completes their arguments

and rebuttals. One speaker from each team will be permitted to rebut.

3.3. The team appearing from the side of the Respondent will have to rebut

during their arguments. They will be given five (5) minutes in addition to the

allotted twenty five (25) minutes for their oral submission.

4. Final Round

4.1. The time limit for the Final Round shall be forty-five (45) minutes for

each team. This shall include the submission of both the student counsels

from the team. Each student counsel shall include the submission of both

the student counsels from the team. Each student counsel shall argue for a

minimum twenty (20) minutes.

IV. ADVANCEMENT OF ORAL ROUNDS

The advancement of oral rounds shall be as follows:

1. Teams with the higher cumulative points from the Preliminary Rounds

shall be ranked higher.

2. If two or more teams have the same cumulative points then the team with

the higher cumulative memorial score. i.e. the score of the memorial shall be

ranked higher.

3. The ranks/marks are not to be disclosed to the teams until the Final

Rounds are concluded.

4. The Semi – Final: The four teams shall have to argue the case only from

one side and shall be assigned sides by draw of lots. Two teams will be

qualifying for the finals on the Knock – Out basis.

5. The Final: The two team shall be assigned side by draw of lots. The team

which scores higher marks in the final round, shall be declared as winner.

The other team shall be declared as the Runner-Up.

V. EXCHANGE OF MEMORIALS

1. Prior to each round, the organizers will arrange for the exchange of the

memorials.

2. The teams are prohibited from making any marks on the exchanged

memorials.

3. The teams are prohibited from making any copies of the memorials which

have been thus exchanged.

4. The teams are required to return the exchanged memorials to the Court

officers of the respective rounds.

VI. MISCELLANEOUS

1. The College reserves the right to amend, modify, change or repeal any of

the competition rules at any stage. The College shall communicate any

changes made in the competition rules to the Participating Teams.

2. In case of any doubt in either understanding any of the details or

interpreting them, the decision taken by the organizers shall be final and

binding.

3. Drawing of lots for the Preliminary Round shall take place on 23rd March,

2019 at the venue.

4. Rules should be strictly adhered to. Any deviation thereof can attract

penalties and may be even disqualification.

5. Organizers shall reserve unanticipated or unexpected contingencies, if

any, and the decision in this regard shall be final.

IMPORTANT DATES

1. 14th March, 2019 (on or before 17.00 hours): Last date for e-mailing soft

of the Memorial to College email.

2. 15th March, 2019 (on or before 17.00 hours): Last date for receiving four

(4) copies of each side of the Memorial by post.

3. 23rd March, 2019: Inauguration of „Legis Centrum - National Level Law

Fest, 2018-19‟.

4. 23rd March, 2019: Students Orientation, Drawing of Lots and Exchange of

Memorials & Preliminary Rounds of Moot Court Competition.

5. 24th March, 2019: Semi-Final Round followed by declaration of results.

6. 24th March, 2019: Final Round of Late 13th National Level Moot Court

Competition.

VENUE OF THE COMPETITION:

K. C. Law College, Dinshaw Vaccha Road, K. M. Kudnani Chowk,

Churchgate, Mumbai – 400020.

Email Id:

Contact Persons:

Faculty Co-ordinator: Dr. Kiran Sharma – 09773706539

Student Co-ordinator: Mr. Kunal Motwani – 09969709664

Asst. Student Co-ordinator –Ms. Hetanshi Kamdar – 09920233699

Asst. Student Co-ordinator – Mr. Gauresh Patil - 09004888672

* Disclaimer: The moot court problem is based on purely fictitious facts,

whereby the characters and the incidents or the course of event in the moot

problem are completely imaginary and the same has no relation to any living

or dead past/present real life incidents. The Moot Court problem is made

solely for the purpose to train the students of law.

Prizes:

(A) 14th National Client Counselling Competition

(1) The winning team for the 14th National Client Counselling Competition

will be awarded a trophy and certificate of merit.

(2) The runners – up team for the 14th National Client Counselling

Competition will be awarded a trophy and certificate of merit.

(B) Letter to the Chief Justice Competition

1) The winning team for the Letter to the Chief Justice Competition will be

awarded a trophy and certificate of merit.

2) The runners up for the Letter to the Chief Justice Competition will be

awarded a runners-up trophy and certificate of merit.

(C) 13th National Level Moot Court Competition

1) The winning team for the 13th National Level Moot Court Competition will

be awarded a trophy and certificate of merit.

2) The runners – up team for the 13th National Level Moot Court Competition

will be awarded a trophy and certificate of merit.

3) Best Student Advocate will be awarded a trophy and certificate of merit.

4) Best Researcher will be awarded a trophy and certificate of merit.

(D) Participation Certificate

Each participant will be given a participation certificate.

IMPORTANT DETAILS:

Maximum students of 6 per College will be allowed to participate in

altogether three events of the Legis Centrum - A National Level Law Fest.

For any Queries the participating teams can contact:

Student Event Co-ordinator: Mr. Vinay Nair - 09619431898

Registration:

1) Each participating institute have to register by making a payment of

Rs.3,000/- through a demand draft drawn in favour of “THE PRINCIPAL,

K. C. LAW COLLEGE‟ payable at Mumbai. The registration fee does not

include accommodation charges.

2) Teams from each participating College are required to send a scanned

copy of their duly filled-in registration form along with the demand draft for

registration via email to kclc.legiscentrum@gmail.com or

info@kclawhsnc.edu.in latest by 27th February, 2019.

3) Teams participating are required to send the hard copy of the Registration

form, Demand Draft latest by 28th March, 2019 at “K. C. Law College, 23,

Dinshaw Vacha Road, Vidyasagar Prin. K. M Kundnani Chowk, Churchgate,

Mumbai, Maharashtra - 400020.”

4. Teams shall provisionally register with the host College by 20th February,

2019 before sending the Registration Form, Demand Draft and Travel Form.

Forms will only be accepted if the host has confirmed the Registration

formalities.

Accommodation

1) Participants will be provided accommodation on request. Student will be

charged for the said accommodation accordingly.

2) No pickup drop services will be provided by the host college. It will only be

provided from the place of accommodation to the College premises.

VENUE OF THE COMPETITION:

K. C. Law College, 23, Dinshaw Vacha Road, Vidyasagar Prin. K. M

Kundnani Chowk, Churchgate, Mumbai, Maharashtra – 400020.

Email id: info@kclawhsnc.edu.in and

Website: http://www.kclawhsnc.edu.in/

H. S. N. C. Board’s K. C. Law College

Presents Legis Centrum

Programme Schedule Sr.

No.

Date and Time Schedule

1. (Day 1)

23rd March, 2019

08.15 a.m.- 09.00 a.m.

Registration & Breakfast

2. (Day 1)

23rd March, 2019

09.00 a.m.- 10.15 a.m.

Inaugural Function of Legis Centrum - A National Level Law

Fest

3. (Day 1)

23rd March, 2019

10.15 a.m.-11.15 a.m.

Letter to the Chief Justice Competition

4. (Day 1)

23rd March, 2019

11.15 a.m.-01.45 a.m.

Preliminary Round of Client Counselling

5. (Day 1)

23rd March, 2019

1.45 p.m. - 2.45 p.m.

Lunch Break, Declaration of Result of Preliminary Round of

Client Counselling & Draw of Lots & Exchange of Memorials for

Moot Court Competition

6. (Day 1)

23rd March, 2019

02.45 p.m. - 3.45 p.m.

Semi – final Round of Client Counselling

7. (Day 1)

23rd March, 2019

03.45 p.m. – 6.00 p.m.

Preliminary Round of Moot Court Competition

8. (Day 1)

23rd March, 2019

06.00 p.m. - 6.15 p.m.

Declaration of Results of Preliminary Round of Moot Court

Competition & Semi - Final Round of Client Counselling

9. (Day 2)

24th March, 2019

08.30 a.m.- 09.30 a.m.

Reporting of the Participants & Breakfast

Final Round of Client Counselling

10. (Day 2)

24th March, 2019

10.00 a.m. – 11.30 pm

Final Round of Client Counselling

11. Day 2)

24th March, 2019

11.30 p.m. – 12.30 p.m.

Semi – Final Round of Moot Court Competition

12. Day 2)

24th March, 2019

12.30 p.m. – 1.30 p.m.

Lunch Break & Declaration of Result of Semi-Final Round of

Moot Court Competition & Exchange of Memorials for Final

Round

13. (Day 2)

24th March, 2019

1.30 p.m.- 2.30 p.m.

Guest Lecture by Eminent Legal Luminary

14. (Day 2)

24th March, 2019

2.30 pm - 4. 15 p.m.

Final Round of Moot Court Competition

15. (Day 2)

24th March, 2019

04.15 p.m. - 4.30 p.m.

High Tea

16. (Day 2)

24th March, 2019

04.30 p.m. - 5.30 p.m.

Valedictory Function

HYDERABAD (SIND) NATIONAL COLLEGIATE BOARD

KISHINCHAND CHELLARAM LAW COLLEGE

Presents

LEGIS CENTRUM

(National Level Law Fest)

23rd

& 24th

March, 2019

REGISTRATION FORM FOR REGISTRATION OF COLLEGES

1. Name of the College ________________________________________________________

2. Address of the College ________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________

3. Telephone No. ________________________________________________________

4. Email Id ________________________________________________________

Seal and Signature of the Head of the Institute

*Please cut out the forms

HYDERABAD (SIND) NATIONAL COLLEGIATE BOARD

KISHINCHAND CHELLARAM LAW COLLEGE

Presents

LEGIS CENTRUM

(National Level Law Fest)

23rd

& 24th

March, 2019

REGISTRATION FORM FOR CLIENT COUNSELING

COMPETITION

1. Name of the College: ________________________________________________

2. Address of the College: ________________________________________________

________________________________________________

3. Name of the Participant: (1) ________________________________________________

(2) ________________________________________________

4. Mobile No.: ________________________________________________

5. Email Id of the Participant: ________________________________________________

Seal and Signature of the Head of the Institute

*Please cut out the forms

HYDERABAD (SIND) NATIONAL COLLEGIATE BOARD

KISHINCHAND CHELLARAM LAW COLLEGE

Presents

LEGIS CENTRUM

(National Level Law Fest)

23rd

& 24th

March, 2019

REGISTRATION FORM FOR LETTER TO THE CHIEF JUSTICE

COMPETITION

1. Name of the College: ______________________________________________

2. Address of the College: ______________________________________________

______________________________________________

3. Name of the Participant: (1) ______________________________________________

(2) ______________________________________________

4. Mobile No.: ______________________________________________

5. Email Id of the Participant: ______________________________________________

Seal and Signature of the Head of the Institute

*Please cut out the forms

HYDERABAD (SIND) NATIONAL COLLEGIATE BOARD

KISHINCHAND CHELLARAM LAW COLLEGE

Presents

LEGIS CENTRUM

(National Level Law Fest)

23rd

& 24th

March, 2019

REGISTRATION FORM FOR 13th NATIONAL LEVEL MOOT

COURT COMPETITION

1. Name of the College: ______________________________________________

2. Address of the College: ______________________________________________

______________________________________________

3. (A) (i) Name of the Mooter 1: ____________________________________________

(ii) Class: ____________________________________________

(iii) Email Id: ___________________________________

(B) (i) Name of the Mooter 2: ____________________________________________

(ii) Class: ____________________________________________

(iii) Email Id: ___________________________________

(C) (i) Name of the Researcher: ________________________________________________

(ii) Class: _______________________________________________

(iii) Email Id: ___________________________________

4. Mobile No.: _____________________________________________

Seal and Signature of the Head of the Institute

*Please cut out the form

PHOTO

PHOTO

PHOTO