principals’ council meetings may 2013. given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much...

22
Educator Effectiveness Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013

Upload: rosalind-erika-miles

Post on 26-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

Educator Effectiveness

Principals’ Council MeetingsMay 2013

Page 2: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

Non-Teaching Professionals- Act 82 Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after

much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify individuals working under instructional certifications who do not provide direct instruction to students as non-teaching professionals as defined in Act 82.

Given that they are working under an instructional certification they will be evaluated utilizing the Framework for Teaching. However, the observation component will constitute 80% and the multiple measures component will be 20% of professional’s evaluation. Additionally, they will not be evaluated under Act 82 till the fall of 2014.

Page 3: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

Non-Teaching Professionals- Act 82 Who? IU TAC hired under a teacher contract IU Consultants hired under a teacher

contract Instructional coaches Special education case-managers Others?

Page 4: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

The Elective Portion of the Teacher Evaluation Model

The SLO (Student Learning Objective)

Process

Activity Update 4/16/13

Page 5: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

Starting with the end in mind…

To develop a process through which teacher effectiveness can be measured based on student achievement.Considerations:

1. Meeting legal requirements2. Meeting LEA capacity concerns 3. Developing Assessment Literacy4. Aligning and applying assessment to teacher evaluation

Page 6: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

2. Meeting LEA Capacity Concerns

a. Creation of Vetted Content –Specific Models

b. Training Modules for IU Trainers and LEA leadership

c. Development of online materials for personal, LEA and IU use

Page 7: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

3. Developing Assessment Literacy

Page 8: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

3. Developing Assessment Literacy

Page 9: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

SLO Development and Implementation Timeline

• May– Continued model vetting (both PA practitioners and RIA personnel

• June– Intent to have models, template available

• August 1– Go Live date for online SLO creation and implementation tools

• 2013/2014 School Year– Continued development and refinement of models and online

tools– Continued training of IU and LEA personnel– Implementation Evaluation Study and Analysis, subsequent process

refinement• Fall 2014

– SLO Process to be implemented as defined by current law

Page 10: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

2013-2014

Practice Makes Perfect!

2014-2015: Full Implementation

Page 11: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

PDE submits Regulatory Analysis Form, Preamble and Regulation – March 2013

Governor’s Office of General

Counsel – Review for form and

legality

Governor’s Budget Office –

Prepares fiscal note

Governor’s Policy Office –

Review for policy and

related issues

Note: There is no statutory timetable for the completion of these reviews.

Timetable for Classroom Teacher RulemakingStep #1: Governor’s Offices Review

Page 12: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

Timetable for Classroom Teacher RulemakingStep #2: Publication

Governor’s Office of General Counsel

Governor’s Budget Office

Governor’s Policy Office

PDE Submits formal final rule to Office of Pennsylvania Code and Bulletin

in the Legislative Reference Bureau

Pennsylvania Code and Bulletin

Publication as a final rule with the full force and effect of law

in the Pennsylvania Bulletin in April 2013

Pennsylvania Code and Bulletin -

10 days to 2 weeks to prepare rule for

publication

Page 13: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

DRAFT(4/15/13)

DRAFT(4/15/13)

Page 14: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

DRAFT(4/15/13)

DRAFT(4/15/13)

Page 15: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

DRAFT(4/15/13)

DRAFT(4/15/13)

Page 16: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

Principal Effectiveness

Page 17: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

The survey is being developed and as soon as that work is completed, Phase II participants will be sent an email asking for their feedback. The survey will consist of Likert formated questions and open-ended questions.

Survey Monkey will be used to collect the responses.

Survey to Participants in Phase II

Page 18: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

Email addresses are being collected so that the surveys can be sent to obtain additional feedback on the Principal Effectiveness framework and process.

We added a field to the data collection instrument website to collect the administrator’s email address. As a reminder, the principal data collection instrument can be found at:

http://webapps.pattan.net/tes/PEval/principalevalcontact.asp

PaTTAN will send out survey links on a rolling basis as evaluations are completed (in batches every 2 weeks after May 1).

Survey to Participants in Phase II (continued)

Page 19: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

Each resource will be included as part of the IU refresher training.

Updates to process/requirements for Phase III.

Systems graphic representing the process.

Evidence Documents Revised to represent evidence, rather than process.

Includes examples of evidence, NOT requirements.

The actual evidence that is provided is determined locally. Evidence is not to be sent to PDE.

Provide additional examples for specific roles (e.g. CTC Directors).

Preview of New Resources for Phase III

Page 20: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

Connectedness (Conversation) documents The documents will be provided to spur some thoughts as

to the individual conversations that occur between a principal/teacher and supervising administrator/principal.

The actual conversations that occur should be determined locally.

It is not mandatory to use these questions, nor should they be viewed as a “checklist” to be followed.

They are provided solely as a resource.

Preview of New Resources for Phase III

Page 21: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

Framework Updates◦ Inclusion of an additional component 2g: Ensures

a High Quality, High Performing Staff The school leader establishes, supports and effectively

manages processes and systems which ensure a high quality, high performing staff.

◦ Other updates based upon Survey Monkey Feedback.

Preview of New Resources for Phase III

Page 22: Principals’ Council Meetings May 2013.  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify

August 1 – October 25 Turn-Around Training

November 1, 2013 – June 30, 2014 Proposed Phase III Timeline

Those trained and ready to begin the process are encouraged to start earlier

PE Key Dates