principles of economics ohio wesleyan university goran skosples imperfect competition 11. imperfect...

33
Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples 11. Imperfect Competition

Upload: franklin-bell

Post on 29-Dec-2015

227 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

Principles of Economics

Ohio Wesleyan UniversityGoran Skosples

11. Imperfect Competition

Page 2: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

2

Page 3: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

3

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

What market structures lie between perfect competition and monopoly, and what are their characteristics?

What outcomes are possible under oligopoly?

Why is it difficult for oligopoly firms to cooperate?

How is monopolistic competition similar to perfect competition? How is it similar to monopoly?

What are the social costs and benefits of advertising and brand names?

Page 4: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

4

Introduction: Between Monopoly and Competition

Two extremes• Competitive markets: ________ firms,

________ products• Monopoly: _____ firm

In between these extremes• Oligopoly: only a few sellers offer similar or

identical products • Monopolistic competition: many firms sell

similar but not identical products.

Page 5: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

5

P Q

$0 140

5 130

10 120

15 110

20 100

25 90

30 80

35 70

40 60

45 50

EXAMPLE: Cell Phone Duopoly in Smalltown

Smalltown has 140 residents

The “good”: cell phone service with unlimited anytime minutes and free phone

Smalltown’s demand schedule

Two firms: T-mobile, Verizon(duopoly: an oligopoly with two firms)

Each firm’s costs: FC = $0, MC = $10

Page 6: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

6

5045

6040

7035

8030

9025

10020

11015

12010

1305

140$0

QP

1,750

1,800

1,750

1,600

1,350

1,000

550

0

–650

–1,400

Profit

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

1,100

1,200

1,300

$1,400

Cost

2,250

2,400

2,450

2,400

2,250

2,000

1,650

1,200

650

$0

Revenue

EXAMPLE: Cell Phone Duopoly in Smalltown

Competitive outcome:

P = _______Q = ______Profit = $___

Competitive outcome:

P = _______Q = ______Profit = $___

Monopoly outcome:P = $____Q = _____

Profit = $_____

Monopoly outcome:P = $____Q = _____

Profit = $_____

Page 7: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

7

EXAMPLE: Cell Phone Duopoly in Smalltown

One possible duopoly outcome: _________

Collusion: an agreement among firms in a market about quantities to produce or prices to charge

T-mobile and Verizon could agree to each produce half of the monopoly output:• For each firm: Q = ___, P = $__, profits = $___

Cartel: a group of firms acting in unison, e.g., T-mobile and Verizon in the outcome with collusion

Can you name a cartel?

Page 8: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

8

A C T I V E L E A R N I N G 1: Collusion vs. self-interestA C T I V E L E A R N I N G 1: Collusion vs. self-interest

Duopoly outcome with collusion:Each firm agrees to produce Q = 30, earns profit = $900.

If T-mobile reneges on the agreement and produces Q = 40, what happens to the market price? T-mobile’s profits?

Is it in T-mobile’s interest to renege on the agreement?

If both firms renege and produce Q = 40, determine each firm’s profits.

8

P Q

$0 140

5 130

10 120

15 110

20 100

25 90

30 80

35 70

40 60

45 50

Page 9: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

9

A C T I V E L E A R N I N G 1: AnswersA C T I V E L E A R N I N G 1: Answers

If both firms stick to agreement, each firm’s profit = $

If T-mobile reneges on agreement and produces Q = 40:

Market quantity = ___, P = $___T-mobile’s profit = ___________________

T-mobile’s profits are _______ if it reneges.

Verizon will conclude the same, so both firms _______, each produces Q = __:

Market quantity = ___, P = $____Each firm’s profit = __________________

P Q

$0 140

5 130

10 120

15 110

20 100

25 90

30 80

35 70

40 60

45 50

Page 10: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

10

Collusion vs. Self-Interest Both firms would be _______ off if both stick to

the cartel agreement.

But each firm has incentive to __________ the agreement.

Lesson: It is ________ for oligopoly firms to form cartels and honor their agreements.

Page 11: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

11

A C T I V E L E A R N I N G 2: The oligopoly equilibriumA C T I V E L E A R N I N G 2: The oligopoly equilibrium

If each firm produces Q = 40,market quantity = 80 P = $30 each firm’s profit = $800

Is it in T-mobile’s interest to increase its output further, to Q = 50?

Is it in Verizon’s interest to increase its output to Q = 50?

11

P Q

$0 140

5 130

10 120

15 110

20 100

25 90

30 80

35 70

40 60

45 50

Page 12: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

12

A C T I V E L E A R N I N G 2: AnswersA C T I V E L E A R N I N G 2: Answers

If each firm produces Q = 40, then each firm’s profit = $800.

If T-mobile increases output to Q = 50:Market quantity = ___, P = $____T-mobile’s profit = ____________ = ________

T-mobile’s profits are ________ at Q = 40 than at Q = 50.

The _______ is true for Verizon.

12

P Q

$0 140

5 130

10 120

15 110

20 100

25 90

30 80

35 70

40 60

45 50

Page 13: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

13

The Equilibrium for an Oligopoly Nash equilibrium: a situation in which

economic participants interacting with one another each choose their best strategy given the strategies that all the others have chosen

Our duopoly example has a Nash equilibrium in which each firm produces Q = .

• Given that Verizon produces Q = 40, T-mobile’s best move is to produce Q = .

• Given that T-mobile produces Q = 40, Verizon’s best move is to produce Q = .

Page 14: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

14

Game Theory Game theory: the study of how people behave in

strategic situations

___________ strategy: a strategy that is best for a player in a game regardless of the strategies chosen by the other players

_____________________: a “game” between two captured criminals that illustrates why cooperation is difficult even when it is mutually beneficial

Page 15: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

15

Prisoners’ Dilemma Example

The police have caught Bonnie and Clyde, two suspected bank robbers, but only have enough evidence to imprison each for 1 year.

The police question each in separate rooms, offer each the following deal:• If you confess and implicate your partner,

you go free.• If you do not confess but your partner implicates

you, you get 20 years in prison.• If you both confess, each gets 8 years in prison.

Page 16: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

16

Prisoners’ Dilemma Example

Confess Remain silent

Confess

Remain silent

Bonnie’s decision

Clyde’s decision

Bonnie gets

8 yearsClyde gets 8 years

Bonnie gets

20 years

Bonnie gets

1 year

Bonnie goes free

Clyde goes free

Clyde gets 1 year

Clyde gets 20 years

Confessing is the dominant strategy for both players.

Nash equilibrium: both confess

Page 17: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

17

Prisoners’ Dilemma Example Outcome: Bonnie and Clyde both _________,

each gets _____ years in prison.

Both would have been better off if both remained silent.

But even if Bonnie and Clyde had agreed before being caught to remain silent, the logic of _______________ interest takes over and leads them to confess.

Page 18: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

18

Oligopolies as a Prisoners’ Dilemma

When oligopolies form a cartel in hopes of reaching the monopoly outcome, they become players in a prisoners’ dilemma.

Our earlier example:• Cingular and Verizon are duopolists in

Smalltown.• The cartel outcome maximizes profits:

Each firm agrees to serve Q = 30 customers.

Here is the “payoff matrix” for this example…

Page 19: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

19

Cingular & Verizon in the Prisoners’ Dilemma

Q = 30 Q = 40

Q = 30

Q = 40

Cingular

Verizon

Cingular’s profit = $900

Verizon’s profit = $900

Cingular’s profit = $1000

Cingular’s profit = $800

Cingular’s profit = $750

Verizon’s profit = $750

Verizon’s profit = $800

Verizon’s profit = $1000

Each firm’s dominant strategy: __________________,

produce Q = ____.

Page 20: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

20

A C T I V E L E A R N I N G 3: The “fare wars” gameA C T I V E L E A R N I N G 3: The “fare wars” game

The players: American Airlines and United Airlines

The choice: cut fares by 50% or leave fares alone.• If both airlines cut fares,

each airline’s profit = $400 million• If neither airline cuts fares,

each airline’s profit = $600 million • If only one airline cuts its fares,

its profit = $800 millionthe other airline’s profits = $200 million

Draw the payoff matrix, find the Nash equilibrium.

20

Page 21: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

21

A C T I V E L E A R N I N G 3: AnswersA C T I V E L E A R N I N G 3: Answers

Nash equilibrium:both firms cut fares

21

Cut fares Don’t cut fares

Cut fares

Don’t cut fares

American Airlines

United Airlines

Page 22: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

22

Other Examples of the Prisoners’ Dilemma

Ad Wars

Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries

Arms race between military superpowers

Common resources

Page 23: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

23

A Comparison of Market Outcomes

When firms in an oligopoly individually choose production to maximize profit,

• Q is ________ than monopoly Q but ________ than competitive market Q

• P is ________ than competitive market P but _________ than monopoly P

What would happen if the number of firms increased?

Page 24: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

24

Introduction to Monopolistic Competition

Monopolistic competition: a market structure in which many firms sell products that are similar but not identical (style or type, location, quality).

Examples:

Page 25: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

25

Monopolistic Competition and Monopoly

Short run: Under monopolistic competition, firm behavior is ______________ monopoly.

Long run: In monopolistic competition, ____________ drive economic profit ________.

Monopolistic Competition and Welfare

Monopolistically competitive markets do not have all the desirable welfare properties of ___________________ markets.

Because P MC, the market quantity is ______ the socially efficient quantity.

Page 26: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

26

Comparison

perfect comp.

monopoly oligopoly monopol. comp.

no of sellers

free entry/exit

LR econ prof.

the products

mkt power

D curve

substitutes?

strategic inter.

competition?

Page 27: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

27

Advertising In monopolistically competitive industries, product

differentiation and markup pricing lead naturally to the use of advertising.

In general, the more differentiated the products, the more advertising firms buy.

Page 28: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

28

The Critique of Advertising

The Defense of Advertising

Page 29: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

29

Advertising as a Signal of Quality

A firm’s willingness to spend huge amounts on advertising may signal the quality of its product to consumers, regardless of the content of ads.

Page 30: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

30

Brand Names In many markets, brand name products coexist with

generic ones.

Firms with brand names usually spend more on advertising, charge higher prices for the products.

As with advertising, there is disagreement about the economics of brand names…

Page 31: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

31

The Critique of Brand Names

The Defense of Brand Names

Page 32: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

32

CHAPTER SUMMARY

Oligopolists can maximize profits if they form a cartel and act like a monopolist.

Yet, self-interest leads each oligopolist to a higher quantity and lower price than under the monopoly outcome.

The larger the number of firms, the closer will be the quantity and price to the levels that would prevail under competition.

Page 33: Principles of Economics Ohio Wesleyan University Goran Skosples Imperfect Competition 11. Imperfect Competition

33

CHAPTER SUMMARY

A monopolistically competitive market has many firms, differentiated products, and free entry.

Product differentiation and markup pricing lead to the use of advertising and brand names. Critics of advertising and brand names argue that firms use them to reduce competition and take advantage of consumer irrationality. Defenders argue that firms use them to inform consumers and to compete more vigorously on price and product quality.