probiotic ppt

22
DIVAKARA R LECTURER DEPT. OF BIOTECHNOLOGY TOCE

Upload: divakaratoce

Post on 23-Nov-2014

191 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Probiotic Ppt

DIVAKARA RLECTURER

DEPT. OF BIOTECHNOLOGYTOCE

Page 2: Probiotic Ppt
Page 3: Probiotic Ppt

• Bacteriocin producing Lactobacillus acidophilus strain was isolated from the gut of marine prawn (Penaeus monodon).

• Bacteriocin is an antibacterial agent against major food borne pathogens.

• Maximum bacteriocin production was observed at temperature 50°C, pH 4 and 0.9% sodium chloride.

• The bacteriocin was purified by ammonium sulphate precipitate and ion exchange (DEAE cellulose) chromatography.

ABSTRACT

Page 4: Probiotic Ppt

• This study revealed the possibility of using bacteriocin as a food preservative and the L. acidophilus strain as probiotic.

• Lactobacillus are gram-positive rods with a size range of 0.5-1.2×1-10 μm and non spore formers producing lactic acid as a fermented end product.

• Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) are useful in the food industry.

• They reduce the pH in food, low enough to inhibit the growth of most of other microorganisms including common human pathogens, thus increasing the shelf life of food (Ivanova et al., 2000).

Page 5: Probiotic Ppt

INTRODUCTION

• LAB are also popular because they produce bacteriocin which is used as food preservative (Daeschel, 1990)

• Bacteriocins are proteinaceous compounds of bacterial origin that are lethal to bacteria other than the producing strain.

• Bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria have received considerable attention because of their possible use as biopreservative in food, with a resultant reduction in the use of chemical preservatives.

Page 6: Probiotic Ppt

• L. acidophilus is one of the strain which produces bacteriocin (Van Reenen and Dicks, 1996).

• In this work antibacterial activity, production, characteristics and isolation of bacteriocin from L. acidophilus isolated from the gut of marine prawn (Penaeus monodon) was studied.

•Several bacteriocin-producing strains have been isolated from marine habitat.

Page 7: Probiotic Ppt

MATERIALS AND METHODS

COLLECTION OF SAMPLES

•P. monodon samples were collected from Mudasalodai area.•Gut sample was used for the current study.

Page 8: Probiotic Ppt

ISOLATION OF BACTERIA•L. Acidophilus was isolated using the method described by Todorov and Dicks (2004).

Prawn gut samples were pooled

ground well

1 g of pooled sample

serially diluted in sterile physiologicalsaline

plated on MRS agar

plates were incubated at 30°Cfor 72-96 hr.

Page 9: Probiotic Ppt

IDENTIFICATION

•The strains were identified according to the method

described by Michael (1981).

•Morphological characteristics

•Physiological characteristics

•Biochemical characteristics

• Gas production capacity• Resistance to biliary salts• pH assay (3-6.5)• Starch hydrolysis

Page 10: Probiotic Ppt

DETECTION OF ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY

Agar spot test method as described by Eamanu et al. (2005).

7 ml of sterile BHI soft agar (47°C)

10 μl of a bioassay strain cell suspension

Then poured over the agar plates

Cooled at room temperature for 30 min

5 μl of culture free supernatant of test organism

Incubated at 37°C for 18-24 hr.

Examined for zone of inhibition

Page 11: Probiotic Ppt

BACTERIOCIN PRODUCTION AND BIOMASS IN DIFFERENT MEDIA

•Measured as described by Eamanu et al. (2005).•MRS broth•GP broth

Test organism was inoculated

OD was measured at 600 nm

bacteriocin titer determined

For every 1 hr. regular interval

Page 12: Probiotic Ppt

DETECTION OF BACTERIOCIN TITER

Quantified by the method described by Todorov andDicks (2004).

Cell free extract of L. acidophillus

Diluted using physiological saline

0.1 μL from each dilution

Spotted in plates seeded with the bioassay strain

Plates were incubated at 37°C for 18-24 hrs.

Examined for the clear zone of inhibition around the spot

The reciprocal of the highest dilution showed the inhibitory activity (Arbitrary Unit)

Page 13: Probiotic Ppt

PURIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF BACTERIOCIN

Ammonium sulphate precipitation:•Crude bacteriocin sample was treated with ammonium sulphate as 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60% saturation (Yang et al., 1992).

•The precipitate was resuspended in 25 ml of 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer.

•The mixture was stirred for 24 hrs. at 4° C.

•Dialysis was followed in a tubular cellulose membrane (1000 cut off) against 2L distilled water for 24 hrs.

•From which the bacteriocin titer was performed

Page 14: Probiotic Ppt

Ion-exchange chromatography

• Dialysate was purified by cation exchange column chromatography using DEAE cellulose column.

• Elution was performed by using a linear gradient citrate phosphate buffer ranging from pH 2.6-7.0 (Macher and Klock, 1980).

• Protein content was determined by Bradford method (Sadasivam and Manickam, 1996).

• The bacteriocin titer was assessed.

Page 15: Probiotic Ppt

Molecular size of bacteriocin

• Molecular size of bacteriocin was determined using SDS PAGE gel following the procedure of Sambrook et al. (2006).

• Using molecular marker ranging from 2,500-40,000 KDa.

Page 16: Probiotic Ppt

RESULTS & DISCUSSION

Isolation of bacteria

• LAB was isolated gut of P. monodon using MRS agar.

• The viable cell count of LAB was around 4.0×105 CFU/g.

• The isolated Lactobacillus strains showed antagonistic activity against L. bulgaricus.

• The strains which showed the largest zone of growth inhibition was selected for further identification.

Page 17: Probiotic Ppt

Morphological characteristics• The colonies were cream, little sticks and smooth round

colonies.

• The strain was gram positive rod.

• In liquid MRS broth it produced uniform turbidity.

Physiological characteristics & biochemical characters• It was homofermentative.

• It showed positive reaction in the fermentation of galactose, glucose,fructose, mannitol, lactose, sucrose and maltose but not with rhamnose.

Page 18: Probiotic Ppt

• It did not produce catalase and amylase.

• Resistant to bilary salt and it produces H2S.

Antimicrobial activity

Antagonistic activity was tested against ten majorpathogens. Among the ten pathogens tested, all the pathogens were found to be sensitive to bacteriocin except Vibrio cholerae.

Page 19: Probiotic Ppt

BACTERIOCIN PRODUCTION AND BIOMASS IN DIFFERENT MEDIA

Both MRS and GP broths showed bacteriocin production at stationary phase at 14 hrs. of incubation. In MRS broth 3400 AU/mL was produced by the strain where as in GP broth it produced only 800AU/mL.

Page 20: Probiotic Ppt

Purification, characterization of bacteriocin Ionexchange Chromatography & Molecular size of bacteriocin

The maximum inhibitory activity was measured at 50% saturation. In ionexchange chromatography (DEAE cellulose) the active fraction was eluted with pH 5.0-citrate phosphate buffer.

Page 21: Probiotic Ppt
Page 22: Probiotic Ppt

REFERENCES Daeschel, M.A., 1990. Application of bacteriocin in food system. In: Bills, D.D. and S.D. Kung. (Eds.),Biotechnology and food safety, Butterworth-

Heinemann, Baston, 91-104. Van Reenen, C.A. and L.M.T. Dicks, 1996. Evaluation of numerical analysis of random amplified polymorphicDNA-PCR on the method to differentiate

Lactobacillus plantarum Lactobacillus pentosus.Curr. Microbiol., 32: 183-187. Todorov, S.D. and L.M.T. Dicks, 2004. Comparison of 2methods for purification of plantaricin ST31, a

bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum ST31 Enzyme and Microbial. Technol., 36: 318-326.

Michael, T., 1981. Family Lactobacillaecea. In: Star, P.(Eds.). The Prokaryotes. New York, Blackwell Press,USA, pp: 609-619.

Eamanu, V., V. Adrian, P. Ovidiu and C. Gheorghe, 2005.Isolation of a Lactobacillus plantarum strain used for obtaining a product for the preservation of fodders. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 4: 403-408.

Yang, R., M.C. Johnson and B. Ray, 1992. Novel method to extract large amounts of b acteriocins from lacticacid bacteria. Appl. and Environ. Microbiol., 58:3355-3359.

Macher, B.A and J.C. Klock, 1980. Isolation and chemical characterization of neutral glycosphingolipids of human neutrophils. J. Biol. Chem., 255: 2092-296.

Sadasivam, S. and A. Manickam, 1996. Protein estimation Bradford method. In. Biochemical method. New age international (p) limited, pp: 58.

Sambrook, J.E., E. Fristsch and T. Maniatis, 2006.. In:Encyclopedia of microbiology. Academic press,pp:383

V. Karthikeyan and S.W. Santhosh,2009. Study of Bacteriocin as a Food Preservative and the L. acidophilus Strain as Probiotic. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 8 (4): 335-340,