process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

46
Process model based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem networks Harmonization of local interests with global sustainability Monika Varga Research Group on Process Network Engineering

Category:

Government & Nonprofit


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Process model based decision supportfor multi-stakeholder

water-food-energy-ecosystem networksHarmonization oflocalinterests

with global sustainability

Monika VargaResearchGroupon Process NetworkEngineering

Page 2: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Water-Food-Energy networks

Water Food

Energy

Source:Garcia andYou,2016.Computers andChemical Engineering,91:49–67.Further edited according to Fig.1ofthe above paper.

30%62%

8%

70%

15%

15%

99%

1%

Page 3: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Challenges ofharmonization• Growing global population→needsmorewater,food andenergyfrom efficient use of renewablelocalresources;

• Globalproblems with climate change andecosystems →need sustainable andresilient designandcontrol oflocalwater/food/energy networks;

• Model based decisions on localpossibilities helpsto find compromise between localinterests andglobal sustainability.

• Longterm questions →Youth have adefiniteinterestandresponsibility for finding solutions!

Page 4: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Conclusion: we have to manage bottom-up themosaics ofthese apparently quite differentprocess networks.

How?

Quantitative decision supportmethods ofProcess SystemsEngineering help to find goodlocalpossibilities:

• to minimize trade-offs and• to maximize synergies.

Page 5: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

What isProcess SystemsEngineering?

• It originates from chemical engineering;• It offersmodelingandsimulation tools for– design,operation,control,andoptimization ofprocess systems.

• Recently it encompassesabroad rangeofmultidisciplinary applications:– e.g.biotechnology,environmental engineering,agriculture and food industry,advancedmaterials,etc.

Page 6: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

How do process modeling andsimulationsupport better decisions?

• Amodel isasimplifiedrepresentationoftheessential features ofaprocess topromoteunderstandingofits real,dynamic behavior;

• Model based simulation enables topercievethose causal interactionsthatwouldnototherwisebeobvious;

• Thesimulation based designandcontroldecisions can consider the balances.

Page 7: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Our method for modeling andsimulation:Direct ComputerMapping

• Automatic generation ofexecutable processmodels from:– Structure:network ofthe investigated problem;– Functionalities:programprototypes to calculatethe elementary processes

• Graphical interface for model expert• Case specific interfaces for users (webbased,MSExcel,etc.)

• Successful andongoing demand-ledapplications:modelers +field experts

Page 8: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Our recent partners (modeling &field experts)

• NationalPolytechnicInstituteofToulouse,France• CenterforProcessandEnvironmentalEngineering,UPC,Barcelona,Spain

• UniversityofPannonia,Veszprem,Hungary

• Ecological ResearchCenter,HungarianAcademyofSciences

• ChinaAgriculturalUniversity,Beijing,China• Fino-FoodLtd.,Hungary• GS1HungaryNon-profitLtd.• ResearchInstituteforFisheriesandAquaculture,NationalAgriculturalResearchandInnovationCentre

Page 9: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Recently studied demand-led examples(with the unified DCMmethodology)

• Complex environmentalprocess system:managementofasensitivewatershed

• Trans-sectorial agrifoodprocess system:quantitativetracing andtracking

• Process design:Recirculating AquacultureSystems

• Process operation:scheduling ofamulti-product dairy plant

Page 10: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Recently studied demand-led examples

• Complex environmentalprocess system:managementofasensitivewatershed [1,2]

• Trans-sectorial agrifoodprocess system:quantitativetracing andtracking

• Process design:Recirculating AquacultureSystems

• Process operation:scheduling ofamulti-product dairy plant

Page 11: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Studied environmental systemEurope

LakeBalatonarea

Hungary

Page 12: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

GISbased interface

Detailed hydrologicalmodel withmeteorological data

CORINErepresentation ofland use

Water network andland use

Page 13: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

User interface

Page 14: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

What isit for?

• To study the effects of(extremly or slowlychanging)meteorological situations;

• To follow contaminants in the watershed;• To study the effects ofpossible land use;• To combine with the investigation ofwater-food-energy-ecosystem related studies.

Page 15: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Example:fictitious weather scenarios

Page 16: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Example:spreading ofcontaminant

Page 17: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Recently studied demand-led examples

• Complex environmentalprocess system:managementofasensitive watershed

• Trans-sectorial agrifoodprocess system:quantitativetracingandtracking[2,3,4,10]

• Process design:RecirculatingAquaculture Systems

• Process operation:schedulingofamulti-product dairy plant

Page 18: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Tracingandtrackingoffood products

Page 19: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Challenges

• Heterogeneous actors (plant cultivation,fodder production,animal breeding,foodprocessing,commerce,etc.)

• Dataservicevaries from the logbook offamily farms to the sophisticated ERPsystems;

• Need for trackingandtracingof(sometimessuddenly appearing)harmful andusefulcomponents.

Page 20: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Testsystems

• Family farm(plant cultivation,vegetables)• Meat chain (from plant cultivation to slaughtering)

Technical partner

• GS1HungaryNonprofit Ltd.

Page 21: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Example:webbased data supply

Page 22: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

What isit for?

• Qualitative tracking• Qualitative tracing• Quantitative tracking• Quantitative tracing• Balance control• Value chain analysis (ongoing)

Page 23: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Example:tracking report

Page 24: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Recently studied demand-led examples

• Complex environmentalprocess system:managementofasensitivewatershed

• Trans-sectorial agrifoodprocess system:quantitativetracing andtracking

• Process design:RecirculatingAquacultureSystems [5,6,8]

• Process operation:scheduling ofamulti-product dairy plant

Page 25: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Recirculation Aquaculture System

Page 26: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Basicscheme ofRAS

Page 27: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Increasing volume ofmultiple tanks in RAS

Page 28: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Challenges

• Technical:– Fish growth,feeding strategy (quality,amount,scheduling)transporting fishes between stagesandwastewater treatment are highly interacting;

– Designandcontrol ofthis whole system hasanenormous complexity.

• Organizational:– Push:long-term contracts for buying fingerlings;– Pull:long-term contracts for selling products.

Page 29: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Example for the modeling interface

Page 30: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

What isit for?

• To design anew system for:– optimal tankstructure ofthe subsequent stages(adapted to the fish speciesandto commercialstrategy);

– optimal waste water treatment unit.

• To control anexisting system for:– optimal operation (e.g.minimize fresh water use);– optimal transporting strategy between the stages.

Page 31: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Example:optimization in a„fictitious tank”

Page 32: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Example:considering diversification in weight

Page 33: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Recently studied demand-led examples

• Complex environmentalprocess system:managementofasensitivewatershed

• Trans-sectorial agrifoodprocess system:quantitativetracing andtracking

• Process design:Recirculating AquacultureSystems

• Process operation:scheduling ofamulti-product dairy plant [7,9]

Page 34: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Demand driven scheduling ofadairy plant

Page 35: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

PLANNING–Monthly

••Target:Equilibrated material balance••Push feature:Yearly based contracts for raw milk••Pull feature:EXPECTEDselling with EMPIRICALESTIMATION

SCHEDULING–Weekly

••Target:100%serving rate••Pull feature:last week selling andproduction numbers +realorders (fixed+ad-hoc)

••Push feature:MUSTprocess the milk in lessthan 48hours

RESCHEDULING– Daily/Shift

••Target:100%serving rate with minimumnumber ofconversions••Pull features:••Orders ofthe coming 4days••Available stock

Planning,scheduling andre-scheduling

Page 36: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Example flowsheet ofdairy plant processes

Rawmilktakeover

Milk processing(pasteurisation,homogenization,

skimming)

Batches••Cheese••Yogurt••Processedcheese

Packaging

Ripening/Storing

Selling

Page 37: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

What isit for?

Dynamic simulation based reasoning with theknowledge ofdemands andstocks supports:

• fast scheduling/rescheduling according to theactual consumers’demands;

• consideration ofmany operational constraints(e.g.cleaning periods,cooling times,changingmachine capacity,etc.).

Page 38: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

2014

.4.3.18

2014

.4.3.14

2014

.4.3.10

2014

.4.3.6

2014

.4.3.2

2014

.4.2.22

2014

.4.2.18

2014

.4.2.14

2014

.4.2.10

2014

.4.2.6

2014

.4.2.2

2014

.4.1.22

2014

.4.1.18

2014

.4.1.14

2014

.4.1.10

2014

.4.1.6

2014

.4.1.2

2014

.3.31.22

2014

.3.31.18

2014

.3.31.14

2014

.3.31.10

2014

.3.31.6

Qua

ntity,p

iece

Changing stocks ofthree products(in linewith packaging andselling)

JoghurtAJoghurtB

Example for decision supporting results

Page 39: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

ConclusionsWe can use unified modellingandsimulationmethods- for analysis,designandoperation- ofthe various sub-systems of water,food,energyandecosystem related processes.

This ought to becombined with utilization ofavailable big data to generate better models forthe actual andpossible solutions.

Outlook: In this way the interacting complexsystems can beoverviewed andevaluated for aquantitatively founded decision support.

Page 40: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Outlook

Page 41: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Outlook

Page 42: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Outlook

Page 43: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

Outlook

Page 44: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

R&Dfor necessary newtechnological alternatives forfood-water-energy processes

Process models,built from thevarious technological

alternatives

Multi-objective evaluations forvarious time horizons

Outlook

Page 45: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

efita2017.org/

Page 46: Process model-based decision support for multi-stakeholder water-food-energy-ecosystem network

References1. Varga M, Balogh S, Csukás B. An extensible, generic environmental process modelling framework

with an example for a watershed of a shallow lake ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE 75:pp. 243-262. (2016) IF: 4.42

2. Varga M, Csukás B. Simulation of Agro-environmental Processes by Direct Computer MappingLecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science II: pp. 847-852. (2015) World Congress onEngineering and Computer Science 2015. San Francisco, USA. ISBN 978-988-14047-2-5

3. Varga M, Csukás B, Balogh S. Transparent Agrifood Interoperability, Based on a Simplified DynamicSimulation Model In: Mildorf T, Charvat K (szerk.) ICT for Agriculture, Rural Development andEnvironment: Where we are? Where we will go?. Prague: Czech Centre for Science and Society,2012. pp. 155-174. (ISBN: 978-80-905151-0-9)

4. András Tankovics, Sándor Balogh, Mónika Varga. Testing of a process model based Web interface forintegration of small family farms in sector spanning traceability. Agriculture Informatics 2013 - Thepast, present and future of agricultural informatics, 8-9. November 2013, Debrecen, Hungary.

5. Varga M, Balogh S, Wei Y, Li D, Csukas B Dynamic simulation based method for the reduction ofcomplexity in design and control of Recirculating Aquaculture Systems INFORMATION PROCESSINGIN AGRICULTURE 3:(3) pp. 146-156. (2016)

6. Varga Mónika, Balogh Sándor, Kucska Balázs, Yaoguang Wei, Daoliang Li, Csukás Béla Testing ofDirect Computer Mapping for dynamic simulation of a simplified Recirculating Aquaculture System.JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL INFORMATICS 6: (3) pp. 1-12. (2015)

7. Linda Egyed, Mónika Varga, Béla Csukás. First steps toward Direct Computer Mapping basedscheduling of dairy production. Agricultural Informatics 2014 - Future Internet and ICT Innovation,13-15 November 2014, Debrecen, Hungary.

8. Gergo Gyalog. Bio-economic optimization of fish producing technologies. Ongoing PhD thesis.9. Linda Egyed. Analysis and development of multiscale (sub)optimal scheduling in a dairy plant.

Ongoing PhD thesis.10. András Tankovics. Dynamic process modeling of a dairy farm. Ongoing PhD thesis.