processor exceptions

22
Processor Exceptions A survey of the x86 exceptions and mechanism for handling faults, traps, and aborts

Upload: veda-giles

Post on 03-Jan-2016

35 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Processor Exceptions. A survey of the x86 exceptions and mechanism for handling faults, traps, and aborts. Types of exceptions. The CPU recognizes various kinds of processing errors (called ‘exceptions’): Those which are known before they have occurred (and which therefore can be prevented) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Processor Exceptions

Processor Exceptions

A survey of the x86 exceptions and mechanism for handling

faults, traps, and aborts

Page 2: Processor Exceptions

Types of exceptions

• The CPU recognizes various kinds of processing errors (called ‘exceptions’):

• Those which are known before they have occurred (and which therefore can be prevented)

• Those which are known only after they’ve occurred (but for which corrective action can still be taken)

• Those which were not forseen, and which do not permit any steps that would lead to recovery

• We will need some more background for explaining these distinctions

Page 3: Processor Exceptions

More ‘application’ registers

• The 8087 NPX (numeric processor extension) introduced eight 80-bit registers (for doing floating-point arithmetic):

• and the Pentium continues to implement these registers

st0st1st2st3st4st5st6st7

80-bits

Page 4: Processor Exceptions

Control Register 0

PG

CD

NW

AM

WP

NE

ET=1

TS

EM

MP

PE

Legend: PE = Protection Enabled (1=yes, 0=no) MP = Math NPX Present (1=yes, 0=no) EM = Emulate Math NPX (1=yes, 0=no) TS = Task was Switched (1=yes, 0=no) ET = NPX Extension-Type (1=387, 0=287) NE = NPX Errors trapped (1=yes, 0=no) WP = Write-Protect user-pages (1=yes, 0=no) AM = Alignment-checking Mask (1=on, 0=off) NW = Non-Write-through (1=yes, 0=no) CD = Cache is Disabled (1=yes, 0=no) PG = Paging is Enabled (1=yes, 0=no)

031

These are NPX-related

These arecache-related

Page 5: Processor Exceptions

More ‘system’ registers

• We already mentioned Control Register 0, but there are also other system registers:

CR0

CR2

CR3

CR4

DR0

DR1

DR2

DR3

DR6

DR7

DR4

DR5

CR1

4 Control Registers

6 Debug Registers= unimplemented register

Page 6: Processor Exceptions

‘Before-the-fact’ errors

• The CPU may fetch an instruction which it cannot correctly execute (due to an invalid operand or insufficient privilege-level, or to the instruction’s opcode not being defined)

• A few examples are:– Attempting to perform a division by zero– Attempting to exceed memory-segment limits– Attempting to modify a ‘read-only’ segment

Page 7: Processor Exceptions

‘After-the-fact’ errors

• Also the cpu may perform some operation that results in an incorrect or illegal value (due to limits on the CPU register-sizes or to limits on the supported data-formats)

• A few examples:– Add positive numbers, but get a negative total– Store an array-entry beyond the array-bounds– Take square-root of a real value less than 0.0

Page 8: Processor Exceptions

“privileged” instructions

• In Protected-Mode the instructions below can only be executed at ring0 (i.e., if the CPU’s Current Privilege Level is zero): – ‘MOV’ to/from a control-register (e.g., CR0) – ‘MOV’ to/from a debug-register (e.g., DR7)– Modifying a system segment-register (i.e.,

‘LGDT’ / ’LIDT’ / ’LLDT’ / ’LTR’ / ’LMSW’ )– Cache-invalidates: ‘INVD’/‘INVLPG’/ WBINVD’– ‘CLTS’ or ‘HLT’

Page 9: Processor Exceptions

What happens if…?

• If protection rules are violated, or if errors result from computations, the processor will generate an ‘exception’ (i.e., it will save some information on the stack and transfer control to an ‘exception-handler’)

• Different kinds of exceptions will trigger different exception-handling procedures

• Gates in the IDT define the ‘entry-points’

Page 10: Processor Exceptions

Faults, traps, and aborts

• Intel classifies exceptions into categories, (according to whether or not it may be possible to ‘recover’ from the ‘error’):– ‘Faults’ are detected ‘before-the-fact’ (and

generally indicate ‘recoverable’ errors) – ‘Traps’ are detected ‘after-the-fact’ (and

indicate some corrective action is needed)– ‘Aborts’ are unrecoverable error-conditions

Page 11: Processor Exceptions

A ‘fault’ example

• Suppose an instruction tries to read from a ‘not-present’ data-segment: mov (%si),ax

• The CPU generate exception-number 0xB• In case the corresponding IDT-descriptor is

a 32-bit interrupt-gate (or trap-gate), the CPU will push at least four 32-bit values:– Current contents of the EFLAGS register– Current contents of registers CS and EIP– An ‘error-code’ (with info about DS register)

Page 12: Processor Exceptions

‘Fault’ example (continued)

• If it is necessary to switch stacks (because of a change in the exception-handler’s code-segment privilege-level), then the ‘old’ stack’s address (i.e., registers SS and ESP) will also get pushed onto the ‘new’ stack

• The fault-handler can take whatever actions are necessary to resolve the ‘not-present’ condition, then mark the data-segment as being ‘present’ and ‘restart’ execution of the prior instruction

Page 13: Processor Exceptions

What about ‘not-present’ gates?

• If an exception is generated, but the IDT’s gate-descriptor for that type of exception isn’t ‘present’, then the CPU generates a General Protection exception (INT-0x0D)

• So by supplying one exception-handler for this ‘catch-all’ exception, you can ‘service’ nearly all of the various error-conditions (if you include code that distinguishes them)

Page 14: Processor Exceptions

Error-Code Formats

• The format of the error-code that the CPU pushes onto its stack depends upon which type of exception has been encountered

• For General Protection exceptions, the error-code format looks like this:

segment selector indexEXT

INT

TI

15 3 2 1 0

TI=Table Indicator (0=GDT, 1=LDT) INT=Interrupt (1=yes, 0=no)EXT=External-to-CPU event was cause of the exception (1=yes, 0=no)

Page 15: Processor Exceptions

Stack Frame Layout (32bit)

ESP

EFLAGS

EIP

SS

CS

Error Code

points to the faulting instruction

points to the old stack’s top

SS:ESP = the new stack’s top

When the ‘fault’ exception uses a 32-bit Interrupt-Gate (or Trap-Gate)

Page 16: Processor Exceptions

Stack Frame Layout (16bit)

SP

FLAGS

IP

SS

CS

Error Code

points to the faulting instruction

points to the old stack’s top

SS:SP = the new stack’s top

When the ‘fault’ exception uses a 16-bit Interrupt-Gate (or Trap-Gate)

Page 17: Processor Exceptions

Catalog of x86 exceptions

• 0x00: divide-overflow fault• 0x01: single-step trap or debug fault• 0x02: non-maskable interrupt (NMI) trap• 0x03: breakpoint trap• 0x04: integer overflow trap• 0x05: array bounds fault• 0x06: invalid opcode fault• 0x07: coprocessor unavailable fault

Page 18: Processor Exceptions

Catalog (continue)

• 0x08: double-fault abort• 0x09: (reserved)• 0x0A: invalid TSS fault/abort• 0x0B: segment not present fault• 0x0C: stack fault• 0x0D: general protection exception fault• 0x0E: page fault• 0x0F: (reserved)

Page 19: Processor Exceptions

Catalog (continued again)

• 0x10: FPU floating-point error fault• 0x11: operand alignment-check fault• 0x12: machine-check exception abort• 0x13: SIMD floating-point exception fault• 0x14-0x1F: (reserved)• 0x20-0xFF: (user-defined interrupts)• NOTE: Only the following exceptions have

error-codes: 0x8, 0xA, 0xB, 0xC, 0xD, 0xE

Page 20: Processor Exceptions

Demo program: ‘whycrash.s’

• To illustrate the processor’s response to exceptions, we created this short demo

• It displays some diagnostic information (including the ‘error-code’) when the CPU triggers any exception-condition (all get routed through the IDT-gate for General Protection exceptions in this demo)

• Can help us identify causes for a ‘crash’

Page 21: Processor Exceptions

In-class exercise #1

• Try experimenting with your own examples of impermissible instructions

• What if you try to store a value to the vram memory-segment using an address-offset larger than its 32KB segment-limit?

• What if you try to load a segment-register with a selector-value that exceeds the size of your descriptor-table?

• What if you try to ‘call’ to ring3 from ring0?

Page 22: Processor Exceptions

In-class exercise #2

• What if you tried to load a selector for the wrong kind of descriptor:

• e.g., putting a code-selector into register SS?• e.g., putting a data-selector into register CS?• e.g., putting a gate-descriptor into register DS?

• What if you tried to execute an ‘undefined opcode’?

• e.g., putting bytes 0xF, 0xB in instruction-stream