production #291

20
1 Production #291 HV HV 1 2 3 7 12 Before After

Upload: ady

Post on 05-Jan-2016

55 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

DESCRIPTION

Production #291. HV. Before After. 3. 7. 12. 2. 1. HV. Production # 503. HV. Before After. HV. Diode scan (no HV) from damaged tube fromCERN HPD #291. Setup and readout. B. HV =10 kV. Keithly 80 V BIAS and ampmeter. 80.00 V. 05.956 nA. LED pulser. Ortec Preamp A~0.5 mv/pe. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Production #291

1

Production #291HV

HV

12

3 7 12

Before After

Page 2: Production #291

2

Production # 503HV

HV

Before After

Page 3: Production #291

3

Diode scan (no HV) from damaged tube fromCERN HPD #291

Page 4: Production #291

4

Setup and readout

HV =10 kV

Ortec Preamp

A~0.5 mv/pe

Keithly 80 V BIAS and ampmeter

80.00 V 05.956 nA

B

LED pulser

Page 5: Production #291

5

Noise seen with ortec QI amplifier in Pixel10

-0.05

-0.04

-0.03

-0.02

-0.01

0

0.01

0.02

-1.00E-03 -8.00E-04 -6.00E-04 -4.00E-04 -2.00E-04 0.00E+00

(s)

(V)

We see the same noise at CERN in B-field (Ortec amplifier is a QI, fast rise time and slow decay)

Page 6: Production #291

6

HPD 291 no Angle

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6

B (T)

Bia

s cu

rren

t (n

A)

Bias Curr

Big Pulses

We can see the small pulses with keithly bias supplyWithout amplifier we see also large pulses in bursts

Page 7: Production #291

7

HPD 503 at 0.7 Tesla

05

101520253035404550

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Angle (deg)

Bia

s C

urr

ent

(nA

)

bias curr

Big Pulses

When getting on an angle small pulses increase but large ones disappear

Page 8: Production #291

8

Tube 291

-0.02

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

-4.E-06 1.E-06 6.E-06

(s)

(V)

pixel 5

pixel 10

Pulse shape of large pulses seen in the two pixels (smaller ones are later in time)At 10 V bias pulse becomes very wide(10 micro seconds) > so it looks like a real photo current

Page 9: Production #291

9

Tube 291

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

-4.00E-06 1.00E-06 6.00E-06

(s)

(V)

pixel 19 (x 50)

pixel 1

Two pulses seen in two opposite side pixelsHere PIXEL 1 is the biggest(smaller ones are later in time)

Page 10: Production #291

10

Tube 291

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

-4.00E-06 1.00E-06 6.00E-06

(s)

(V)

pixel 19

pixel 1 (x 10)

Two pulses pulses seen in two opposite side pixelsHere PIXEL 19 is the biggest(smaller ones are always later in time)

Page 11: Production #291

11

Tube 291 using QI-preamp on pixel 10 while triggered on pixel5

-0.40

-0.30

-0.20

-0.10

0.00

0.10

0.20

-2.00E-03 -1.00E-03 0.00E+00 1.00E-03 2.00E-03

(s)

(V)

pixel 5 triggered

pixel10 through Amplifier

Relation between Large and small noise signalsWe triggered on the big pulse in channel 5 and look at the amplified signal from Pixel 10 (small pulses disappear for some time after a big pulse )

AC coupling to scope

Total 4 ms

Page 12: Production #291

12

Tube 291 using QI-preamp

-0.4

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

-2.00E-02 0.00E+00 2.00E-02

(s)

(V)

pixel5 triggered

pixel10 amplified

Relation between Large and small noise signalsWe triggered on the big pulse in channel 5 and look at the amplified signal from Pixel 10 (small pulses disappear for some time after a big pulse )

Total 40 ms

Page 13: Production #291

13

We also took data where we KNOW that we triggered on the pixel which was EARLIER in time and had the Amplifier on the one that “reacted” later.

(sorry, but the data on the file was corrupted and Brian is trying to recover it now…)

In this case, the later one did NOT have the small pulses either before or after the big pulse.

Thus, pixels with small pulses are the ones which start the “cascade” and the other pixels which follow have been quiet just before (and after).

Page 14: Production #291

14

HV

10 M Voltmeter20 Mohm

OR

HPD HV gnd

RBX gnd

PC

diode

1G

VB

Scope on 50 ohm

Setup to look at the HV current on side walls of HPD (diode is isolated from this current path)

Cable capacitance

??

Page 15: Production #291

15

HV vs current (B=0) HPD =~10Tohm

-1.8

-1.6

-1.4

-1.2

-1

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

HV (kV)

Cu

rre

nt

(nA

)HV current to Ground through ~5Mohm Previous measured at CERN

Page 16: Production #291

16

DC measured current to ground and noise counts measured in pedestal vs B ( B, E = 20 degree, HV=6 kV)

-1.4

-1.35

-1.3

-1.25

-1.2

-1.15

-1.1

-1.05

-1

0.0 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4

B (Tesla)

Cu

rre

nt

in n

A

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

No

ise

ev

en

ts a

bo

ve

10

fC

DC current[nA]

noise counts

Correlation between DC measured current through the side-walls of HPD and Noise

Page 17: Production #291

17

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

-5.00E-07 5.00E-07(s)

(V)

current to ground (offset 1V and x10)

Pixel 1 (triggered)

Correlation between AC measured current through the side-walls of HPD and Large noise pulses(Pulse in the HV current is first) (negative so it is opposite from photo current)

Page 18: Production #291

18

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

-5.00E-07 5.00E-07(s)

(V)

current to ground (offset 1V and x10)

Pixel 1 (triggered)

Correlation between AC measured current through the side-walls of HPD and Large noise pulses(Pulse in the HV current is first) (negative so it is opposite from photo current)

Page 19: Production #291

19

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

-2.00E-06 -1.00E-06 0.00E+00 1.00E-06 2.00E-06 3.00E-06 4.00E-06(s)

(V)

current to ground (offset 1V and x10)

Pixel 1 (triggered)

Correlation between AC measured current through the side-walls of HPD and Large noise pulses(Pulse in the HV current is first) (negative so it is opposite from photo current)

Page 20: Production #291

20

NO Angle

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0 1 2 3 4 5

B (Tesla)

Bia

s C

urr

en

t(n

A)

HPD 291

HPD 503

HPD 193

The worst HPD has his noise completelyreduced at 4 Tesla(we did 18 hour test at 4 Tesla with no increase)(We are currently running the best one at 1.3 Tesla for a 1 day)