profession germanynorth america based on international peers survey may 2015

General Practitioner

OMS

Prosthodontist

Periodontist

Implantologist

-10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%

9%

31%

40%

20%

0%

General Practi-tioner

OMS

Prosthodontist

Periodontist

Implantologist

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%

35%

57%

20%

9%

23%

Profession

GermanyNorth America

Based on international PEERS survey May 2015

5-10 Jahre

11-20 Jahre

Mehr als 20 Jahre

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%

13%

39%

48%

Length of time working in dentistry


5-10 years

11-20 years

More than 20 years

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%

0%

24%

76%


Male

Female

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%

96%

4%

Gender


Male

Female

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%

88%

13%


Primary work setting


Private practice

University

Public healthcare

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%

80%

18%

2%

Private practice

University

Public healthcare

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%

83%

14%

3%


<40 years old

41-60 years old

61-75 years old

>75 years old

0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00%

6%

21%

38%

28%

Unter 40 Jahre:

41–60 Jahre:

61–75 Jahre:

Über 75 Jahre:

0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00%

4%

11%

21%

25%

Fully edentulous in one jaw:percentage by patient age group



<40 years old

41-60 years old

61-75 years old

>75 years old

0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00%

4%

16%

36%

35%

Unter 40 Jahre:

41–60 Jahre:

61–75 Jahre:

Über 75 Jahre:

0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00%

3%

8%

19%

26%

Fully edentulous in both jaws:percentage by patient age group



Konventionelle Prothese:

Deckprothese auf zwei Implantaten:

Deckprothese auf vier Implantaten:

Deckprothese auf mehr als vier Implantaten:

Brücke auf vier Implantaten:

Brücke auf mehr als vier Implantaten:

0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00% 45.00%

35%

4%

22%

17%

5%

16%

Conventional den-ture

Overdenture on two implants

Overdenture on four implants

Overdenture on more than four

implants

Bridge on four implants

Bridge on more than four implants

0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00% 45.00%

38%

4%

22%

10%

11%

26%

Fully edentulous in the upper jaw:percentage by treatment type provided



Konventionelle Prothese:

Deckprothese auf zwei Implantaten:

Deckprothese auf vier Implantaten:

Deckprothese auf mehr als vier Implantaten:

Brücke auf vier Implantaten:

Brücke auf mehr als vier Implantaten:

0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00%

29%

20%

28%

6%

7%

14%

Conventional den-ture

Overdenture on two implants

Overdenture on four implants

Overdenture on more than four

implants

Bridge on four implants

Bridge on more than four implants

0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00%

21%

31%

17%

3%

20%

22%

Fully edentulous in the lower jaw:percentage by treatment type provided



Not likely

Somewhat likely

Very likely

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%

3%

33%

64%

Nicht wahrscheinlich

Weniger wahrscheinlich

Sehr wahrscheinlich

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%

4%

12%

85%

How likely to incorporate a removable with the stability of a fixed solution?


North America Germany

Replacement of resilient, remov-

able implant connectors

Adjustment of the connectors

Relining of the denture base for

improved soft tissue support

None of the above

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%

68%

18%

59%

29%

What services do you charge for?


Replacement of resilient, remov-

able implant connectors

Adjustment of the connectors

Relining of the denture base for

improved soft tissue support

None of the above

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%

72%

36%

82%

17%


Nicht zutreffend

Ein- oder zweimal

Drei- oder viermal

Häufiger als viermal

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0%

45%

51%

2%

2%

Number of times per year your patient’s overdenture needs adjustment


Not applicable

One or two

Three or four

More than four

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0%

35%

65%

0%

0%


Average chairtime for adjustment or replacement of retention component


Less than 15 minutes

15-30 minutes

31-45 minutes

46-60 minutes

Over one hour

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%

52%

29%

14%

5%

0%

Less than 15 minutes

15-30 minutes

31-45 minutes

46-60 minutes

Over one hour

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%

49%

36%

13%

0%

2%


Null

1-25%

26-50%

51-75%

76-100%

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0%

4%

17%

23%

36%

21%

% of conventional denture patients you would consider transitioning to something more stable


Zero

1-25%

26-50%

51-75%

76-100%

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0%

3%

9%

24%

18%

47%


Null

1-25%

26-50%

51-75%

76-100%

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%

24%

53%

12%

7%

4%

Zero

1-25%

26-50%

51-75%

76-100%

-10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%

3%

38%

21%

21%

18%

% of attachment-retained patients you would consider transitioning to something more stable



Null

1-25%

26-50%

51-75%

76-100%

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%

24%

54%

11%

10%

2%

Zero

1-25%

26-50%

51-75%

76-100%

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%

15%

53%

12%

18%

3%

% of patients with attachment-retained prostheses who have expressed the desire for something more stable



Anatomical/func-tional (e.g. alveo-lar ridge resorp-

tion)%

Financial%

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00%

27.71%

61%

Anatomische/funktionale

Gründe (z. B. Resorption des Kieferkamms):

Finanzielle Gründe:

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00%

35%

56%

% ratio between anatomical vs. financial limitation for not being able to transition to a more stable solution



Patients with fixed solutions – frequency of recall


Zero

One or two

Three or four

Over four

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%

3%

76%

15%

6%

Zero

One or two

Three or four

Over four

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%

6%

74%

16%

4%


No

Yes

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%

56%

44%

Do the screws in a fixed prosthesis need replacement due to “wear and tear”


No

Yes

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%

86%

14%


% of fixed prostheses that require screw replacement


Zero

1-25%

26-50%

51-75%

76-100%

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%

14%

50%

21%

7%

7%

Zero

1-25%

26-50%

51-75%

76-100%

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%

10%

50%

20%

10%

10%


Innerhalb des ersten Jahres

Während des zweiten Jahres

Nach dem zweiten Jahr

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%

30%

10%

60%

Within the first year

During the second year

After the second year

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%

8%

15%

77%

Average time after delivery of fixed prostheses that screws start being replaced



Zweimal pro Jahr

Einmal pro Jahr

Einmal alle 2 Jahre

Einmal alle 3 Jahre und seltener

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%

18%

9%

18%

55%

How often the screws are replaced


Twice a year

Once a year

Once every two years

Once every three+ years

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%

0%

8%

23%

69%


profession germanynorth america based on international peers survey may 2015

Documents