proforma for environmental appraisal of mining projects...

67
Q-1A PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS (MINING SECTOR PROJECTS) 1. General Information (a) Name of the project : Proposed 7.0 MTPA capacity of limestone mine in ML area of 631.311 ha (i) Name of the proponent : Jaypee Cement Corporation Ltd. (Formerly Zawar Cements Pvt. Ltd.) Mailing Address : Sector-128 Noida Uttar Pradesh Pin - 201304 E-mail : [email protected] Telephone : 0120-4609000 Fax No. : 0120-4609464 (b) Objective of the project : Captive lime stone mine (c) Location of mine (s) Village(s) Taluka District State Taranhalli and Shahabad Chittapur Gulbarga (Kalaburagi) Karnataka (d) Does the proposal related to (i) New mine Yes No (ii) Expansion Yes No Increase in ML area Yes No Increase in annual production Yes No (iii) Renewal of ML Yes No (iv) Modernisation Yes No Note 1: All information to be given in the form of Annex/s should be properly numbered and form part of reply to this proforma. Note 2: Please enter √ in appropriate box where answer is Yes / No Note 3: No abbreviation to be used - Not available or Not applicable should be clearly mentioned. Note 4: Core zone is the mining lease area. Buffer zone in case of ML area up to 25 ha. is to be considered as 5 km all around the periphery of the core zone and for ML area above 25 ha. an area 10 km all around the periphery of the core zone. Note 5: Adopt Scoping process in carrying out EIA study. Note 6: Please indicate source of data.

Upload: vuongthien

Post on 09-Mar-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-1A

PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS

(MINING SECTOR PROJECTS)

1. General Information

(a) Name of the project : Proposed 7.0 MTPA capacity of limestone mine in ML area of 631.311 ha

(i) Name of the proponent : Jaypee Cement Corporation Ltd. (Formerly Zawar Cements Pvt. Ltd.)

Mailing Address : Sector-128 Noida Uttar Pradesh Pin - 201304

E-mail : [email protected] Telephone : 0120-4609000 Fax No. : 0120-4609464

(b) Objective of the project : Captive lime stone mine

(c) Location of mine (s)

Village(s) Taluka District State

Taranhalli and Shahabad Chittapur Gulbarga (Kalaburagi)

Karnataka

(d) Does the proposal related to

(i) New mine Yes No

(ii) Expansion Yes No • Increase in ML area Yes No

• Increase in annual production Yes No

(iii) Renewal of ML Yes No

(iv) Modernisation Yes No

Note 1: All information to be given in the form of Annex/s should be properly numbered and form part of reply to this proforma.

Note 2: Please enter √ in appropriate box where answer is Yes / No

Note 3: No abbreviation to be used - Not available or Not applicable should be clearly mentioned.

Note 4: Core zone is the mining lease area. Buffer zone in case of ML area up to 25 ha. is to be considered as 5 km

all around the periphery of the core zone and for ML area above 25 ha. an area 10 km all around the periphery of the core zone.

Note 5: Adopt Scoping process in carrying out EIA study. Note 6: Please indicate source of data.

Page 2: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-2A

(e) Site Information

(i) Geographical Location

• Latitude

• Longitude • Survey of India Topo sheet number • Elevation above Mean Sea Level (aMSL) • Total mining lease area (in ha)

(ii) Dominant nature of terrain • Flat Yes Yes No No

• Undulated Yes No

• Hilly Yes No

2. Land usage of the mining lease area (in ha.)

(a) Agricultural (Private Land) (b) Forest (c) Waste land (Barren land) (d) Grazing (e) Surface water bodies (f) Others (Govt. land-Barren) (g) Govt. Pasture land (h) Habitatted land (i) Private land

Total

3. Indicate the seismic zone in which ML area falls. In case of zone IV & V,

details of earth quakes in last 10 years.

The ML area falls in Seismic Zone-II as per IS-1893 (Part-1)-2002.

(a) Severity (Richter Scale):

(a) Impact i.e. Damage to • Life Yes No

• Property Yes No

• Existing mine Yes No

631.311

17007’27.74” to 17010’10.81”N

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

631.311

76053’00.48” to 76055’27.88”E

631.311 ha

56 C/16, & G/4

400 - 460 m MSL

Nil

Nil

--

Page 3: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-3A

4. Break-up of mining lease area (in ha.) as per approved conceptual plan:

Purpose Mining Lease Area Total Area acquired Area to be acquired

Government Private Government Private Government Private

Forest Others Agri. Others Forest Others Agri. Others Forest Others Agri. Others 1. Area to be excavated

593.311 353.5077 239.8045

2. Storage for top soil - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3. Overburden / Dumps - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4. Mineral storage - - 7.0 - - - - - - - - 7

5. Infrastructure (Workshop, Administrative Building)

- - 10 - - - - 10 - - - - -

6. Roads (Area for Roads and Safety Zone for Roads)

- - 6 - - - - 1.6 - - - 4.4

-

7. Railways - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8. Green Belt - - 15 +3.5 (Out

of point no. 6) + 85 (Out of point no.1) + 7 (On point no. 4)

- - - - - - - - 15 -

9.Tailings pond - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10.Effluent treatment plant - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11.Coal handling plant / mineral separation plant

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

12. Township area - - - - - - - - - - - - - 13.Other (Specify) - - - - - - - - - - - - -

TOTAL

- - 631.311 - - - - 365.1077 - - - 266.2025 -

Page 4: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-4A

5. Township (outside mining lease): No township is proposed, residential

colony is location at plant site

(a) Total area (in ha)

(b) No. of dwelling units (c) Distance from mine site

6. Distance of water bodies (in km) Distance

from

River Bank * Other Water bodies *

Sea / creek / lake / nalla etc.

(specify)

Mining lease boundary

Kagina river- 5.0 km, E

Nandana halla-2.9 Km, W

Bhima river-9.0 km, S

NA

Ancillary facilities NA NA

[* From highest flood line / high tide line] 7. For projects falling within the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ)

Whether the mineral to be mined is of rare nature and not available outside CRZ? Yes No if yes, annex a scaled location map showing low tide line (LTL), high tide line (HTL) duly demarcated by one of the authorized agencies* [ *Director, Space Application Centre, Ahmedabad: Centre for Earth Sciences Studies, Thiruvananthapuram: Institute of Remote Sensing, Anna University, Chennai: Institute of Wetland Management & Ecological Designs, Kolkata: Naval Hydrographers’s Office, Dehradun: National Institute of Oceanography, Panjim, Goa: and National Institute of Ocean Technology, Chennai], boundary of mining lease area, distance of ML area from LTL and HTL CRZ boundary and CRZ classification of the project area as per the approved Coastal Zone Management Plan, and settlements, sand dunes, mangroves, forest land/patches, turtles breeding and nesting sites etc., if any, in the project area.

8. Indicate aerial distance from the periphery of core zone / area from the

periphery of the buffer zone to the boundary of following (up to 10 km):

Sr. No. Areas Name Aerial distance from

(in km.)

Core

Zone*

Buffer Zone*

1. National Park / Sanctuary Nil Nil Nil 2. Biosphere Reserve / Tiger

Reserve / Elephant Reserve / any other Reserve

Nil Nil Nil

3. Forest (RF/PF/Unclassified) Nil Nil Nil 4. Habitat for migratory birds Nil Nil Nil 5. Corridor for animals of

schedule I & II of the Wildlife Nil Nil Nil

-

-

-

Page 5: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-5A

Sr. No. Areas Name Aerial distance from

(in km.)

Core

Zone*

Buffer Zone*

(Protection) Act, 1972

6. Archaeological sites * Notified * Others

Nil Nil Nil

7. Defense Installation Nil Nil Nil 8. Industries / Thermal Power

Plants Jaypee cement

plant Bankur mines

Nil 3.0 km, E

5.0 km, NE 9. Other Mines Nil Nil Nil 10. Airport Nil Nil Nil 11. Railway Lines Shahabad Nil 2.5 km, SE 12. National / State Highways NH–218, SH-125

and 149 Nil 10.0 km W,

0.2 km S and 0.6 km E

[* Buffer zone in case of ML area up to 25 ha. is to be considered as 5 km all around the periphery of the core zone and for ML area above 25 ha. an area 10 km all around the periphery of the core zone]. Study area map showing 10 km radius is given in Annexure-I. 9. Description of flora & fauna separately in the core and buffer zones.*

[* Consult the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 as amended subsequently and list species with (1) Common name (2) Scientific name and (3) under which schedule of the Wildlife (Protection) Act the identified species fall. Get the list authenticated by an Expert in the field/credible scientific institute/University/Chief Wildlife Warden Office. Information to

be based on field survey.] A. Flora Core Zone Buffer Zone 1. Agricultural crops

Annexure-II

2. Commercial crops 3. Plantation 4. Natural vegetation / forest type 5. Grass lands 6. Endangered species 7. Endemic species 8. Others (Specify) B. Fauna 1. Total listing of faunal elements 2. Endangered species 3. Endemic species 4. Migratory species 5. Details of aquatic fauna, if

applicable

10. Details of mineral reserves (as per approved Mining Plan)

Quantity (in million tonnes) as on 01.03.2016 (a) Proved

36.94

Page 6: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-6A

(b) Indicated

(c) Inferred (d) Mineable reserves

11. Major geological formation / disturbances in the mining lease area (a) Geological maps submitted Yes No

Annexure -III

(b) Geological sections submitted Yes No

Annexure-IV

(c) Contour map submitted Yes No

(d) Whether the presence, if any, noted of

(i) Faults Yes No

(ii) Dykes Yes No

(iii) Shear Zone Yes No

(iv) Folds Yes No

(v) Other weak zones Yes No

(e) Source of data (Indicate)

12. Production of mineral(s) and life of mine

(a) Rated capacity of mine mineral wise (Tonnes / annum) (b) Life of mine at proposed capacity (Years)

(c) Lease period (Years)

(d) Date of expiry of lease (D /M /Y) (After execution)

(e) Indicate in case of existing mines (i) Date of opening of mine

7.00 MTPA

62 years

--

50 year

Mine Plan

Nil

217.57

94.17

NA

Page 7: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-7A

(ii) Production in the last 5 years 1st to 5th year from year……… to year ………

in million tonnes. (iii) Projected production for the next 6th to 10th year 5 years from year ……… to year

………..in million tonnes.

(iv) Whether mining was suspended after Yes No opening of the mine? If yes, details thereof including last production figure and reason for the same.

(f) Whether plans & sections provided? Yes No

Plans & sections are covered under Annexure-III and IV 13. Type and method of mining operations

TYPE METHOD

Opencast Manual

Underground Semi-mechanised

Both Mechanised

14. Details of ancillary operations for mineral processing

(a) Existing (c) Additional

15. Mine details

(a) Opencast mine

(i) Stripping ratio (mineral in tonnes to over burden in m3) (ii) Ultimate working depth (in m bgl) (iii) Indicate present working depth in case of

existing mine (in m bgl)

(iv) Thickness of top soil (in m.)

• Minimum

• Maximum

390 m RL

1.0

4.0

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

1:0.16

-

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Page 8: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-8A

• Average

(v) Thickness of overburden (in m.)

• Minimum

• Maximum

• Average

(vi) Mining Plan

• Height and width of the bench in overburden / waste. (temporary storage of topsoil only) • Height & width of the bench in ore body /

coal seam.

• Proposed inclination / slope of the sides of the opencast mine (separately for overburden, coal / ore and overall slope of the pit sides) both while operating the mine as well as at the time of closure of the mine.

• Whether transverse sections across the Yes No

opencast mine at the end of fifth year and at the end of the life of the mine have been submitted? Annexure-IV

(vii) Type of blasting, if any, to be adopted.

(b) Underground mine: Not Applicable

(i) Seam / Ore body Min.Depth (m) Max. Depth (m) Avg. thickness (m)

Rate of dip in degree Direction of dip

(ii) Mode of entry into the mine

• Shaft

• Adit

• Incline

(iii) Details of machinery: Not applicable

-

- -

-

-

-

-

- -

-

-

2.35 m

10 m

9 m height & 30 m width

The slope angle of the bench is maintained below 45 degrees

Multi row drilling and deep hole blasting using millisecond delay / relay detonators

Page 9: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-9A

(iv) Method of stoping (metalliferrous mines)

• Open

• Filled

• Shrinkage

• Caving

• Combination of above

• Others (Specify)

(v) Extraction method

• Caving

• Stowing

• Partial extraction (vi) Subsidence

• Predicted max. subsidence (in m)

• Max. value of tensile strain (in mm/m)

• Max. slope change (in mm/m)

• Whether identified possible subsidence area(s) superimposed on Surface Yes No

Plan has been submitted?

• Major impacts on surface features like natural drainage pattern, houses, buildings, water bodies, roads, forest, etc.

• Salient features of subsidence

management (monitoring and control).

16. Surface drainage pattern at mine site

(a) Whether the pre-mining surface drainage plan Yes No

submitted?

(b) Do you propose any modification / diversion Yes No in the existing natural drainage pattern at any stage? If yes, when. Provide location map indicating contours, dimensions of water body to be diverted, direction of flow of water and proposed route / changes, if any i.e. realignment of river / nallah / any other water body falling within core zone and

its impact.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

- -

-

Page 10: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-10A

17. Embankment and / or weir construction

Not Applicable

(a) Do you propose, at any stage, construction of (i) Embankment for protection against flood? Yes No

(ii) Weir for water storage for the mine? Yes No (b) If so, provide details thereof. Not Applicable

(c) Impact of embankment on HFL and settlement Not Applicable around.

(d) Impact of weir on down stream users of water. Not Applicable 18. Vehicular traffic density (outside the ML area) Not Applicable

Type of vehicles No. of vehicles per day

(a) Existing

(b) After the proposed activity

(c) Whether the existing road Yes No network is adequate? If no, provide details of alternative proposal?

19. Loading, transportation and unloading of mineral and waste rocks on

surface:

(a) Manual Yes No (b) Tubs, mine cars, etc. Yes No (c) Scraper, shovels, dumpers / trucks. Yes No (d) Conveyors (belt, chain, etc.) Yes No (e) Others (specify).

- -

- -

Hydraulic shovels-dumpers/tippers (loading, transportation & unloading) for limestone handling

Page 11: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-11A

20. Mineral (s) transportation outside the ML area

Qty. (in TPD) Percentage (%) Length (in km)

(a) Road

(b) Rail

(c) Conveyors

(d) Rope way

(e) Water ways

(f) Pipeline

(g) Others (Specify)

Total

Nil

Nil

23,400

23,400

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

-

Nil

Nil

100

100

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Page 12: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-11A

21. Baseline Meteorological and Air Quality data

(a) Micro-meteorological data

[Continuous monitoring through autographic instrument for one full season other than monsoon]

(i) Wind rose pattern for one full season (16 points of compass i.e. NE, ENE, NNE, ---) based on 24-hourly data. For coastal area also furnish day-time and night time data.

• Day time

• Night time Refer Annexure-V

• 24 – hours period (ii) Site specific monitored data Month Wind Speed

(kmph)

Temperature (oC) Relative Humidity (%) Rain Fall * (mm) Cloud

Cover**

(Octas of

sky)

Mean Max. % of

calm

Mean

(Dry

Bulb)

Highest Lowest Mean Highest Lowest Total 24-

hours

Highest

No. of

rainy

days

Mean

* 24-hours rainfall should be reported from 08:30 hrs. IST of previous day to 08:30 hrs. IST of the day. * Rainy day is considered when 24 hrs. rainfall is ≥ 2.5 mm. ** Visual observations of cloud cover should be recorded four times a day at regular intervals.

(iii) Indicate name and distance of the nearest IMD meteorological

Station from which climatological data have been obtained : Gulbarga

Page 13: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-12A

(b) Ambient air quality data* (PM10, PM2.5, SO2, and NOx)

[*Monitoring should be carried out covering one full season except monsoon – same season as in 21 (a) (i)] [*Frequency of sampling: Sampling to be done twice a week for the entire season 24 hourly for PM & PM10. For gaseous

pollutants 24- hourly data be given irrespective of the sampling period.]

(i) Season and period for which monitoring has been carried out. : Winter Season (1st December 2015 – 29th February 2016)

(ii) No. of samples collected at each monitoring station : 24 Samples

Name of monitoring equipment used SPM RPM SO2 Nox Pb**

Equipment sensitivity Permissible AAQ standard (CPCB) R

I

S

Monitoring Location

No. of Samples Drawn

Category* (R, I, S)

Min. Max. 95% tile

Min. Max. 95% tile

Min. Max. 95% tile

Min. Max. 95% tile

Min. Max. 95% tile

Core zone

CA1

CA2

CA3

Buffer zone

BA1

Page 14: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-13A

BA2

BA3

Enclosed as Annexure-VI

*R = Residential; S = Sensitive # Annex a location map indicating location of AAQ stations, their direction and distance with respect to project site. 22. Stack and emission details, if any*: Not Applicable

Sr. No.

Process / unit of operation

(e.g. DG Set,

Boiler)

Height of stack

(m)

Internal top dia.

(m)

Flue gas exit

velocity

(m/sec)

Emission rate (kg/hr) Heat emission rate from top of

stack (K.cal/hr)

Exhaust / Flue gas

PM SO2 NOx CO Temp

OC Density Specific

Heat Volumetric flow rate

(m3/hr.)

23. Details of fugitive emissions during mining operations*

The limestone is transported by covered conveyor system from the limestone crusher unit to the plant, having dust suppression system; hence fugitive dust is not envisaged. Water sprinklers will be installed. The dust on haul roads will be suppressed through regular water sprinkling. The fugitive emission generated during drilling is controlled by using dust collectors with vacuum suction to the drilling machines. Dust generation is reduced by using sharp teeth for shovels. The fugitive emissions from mine will be controlled by means of sprinklers and development of greenbelt, which will also serve to arrest the soil erosion. With the proposed control measures, the fugitive emissions will be insignificant in terms of their impact on environment. To control the fugitive emissions, the following measures are taken:

Page 15: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-14A

� An effective dust suppression system installed at limestone handling system in the proposed mine;

� The sprinkling of water to be done along the internal roads in the ML area in order to control the dust arising due to the movement of vehicular traffic;

� All the workers and officers working inside the mine lease area are to be provided with disposable dust masks;

� Thick greenbelt is planned around the mine lease area to arrest the fugitive emissions; and

24. Air Quality Impact Prediction (AQIP)* Enclosed as Annexure-VII

(a) Details of model(s) used for AQIP including grid -

size, terrain features, and input meteorological data (b) Maximum incremental GLC values of pollutants based on -

prediction exercise (in µg/m3)

S. No. Pollutants Incremental Value Ambient Air Quality Resultant Air Quality

1. PM

2**. SO2

3**. NOX

[* Question Number 22, 23 & 24 need not be filled-in for mines having ML area of 25 ha. or less.] [**Information on item no. 2 & 3 to be provided in cases with captive power generation of 500 KVA and above]

Page 16: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-15

25. Water requirement (m3/day)*

Purpose Avg. Demand Peak Demand

A. Mine site

1. Mine operation (Wet drilling)

2. Land reclamation

3. Dust suppression

4. Drinking

5. Green Belt

6. Beneficiation

7. Washeries

8. Fire Service

9. Others (specify) (Vehicle

washing)

(Land Reclamation)

B. Township

1. Green Belt

2. Domestic

3. Other (specify)

30

Nil

60

10

25

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

-

-

-

30

Nil

60

10

25

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

-

-

-

Total 125 125

26. Source of water supply*

S. No. Source m3/day

1 Kagina River (5.0 km, E) 125 2 Ground water -- 3 Water Reservoir -- 4 Other surface water bodies (specify) --

* Which shall be met from the existing allocation for plant & mine of 6180

m3/day water from Kagina river and subsequently from water reservoir developed in the mine.

[*Annex a copy of sanction letter / permission from the concerned authority (Central Ground Water Authority in case of ground water abstraction is from notified area / State Ground Water Board in case of non-notified area / State Irrigation Department for surface water pumping) for drawing water.] Water allocation letter enclosed as Annexure-VIII

27. Lean season flow in case of pumping from river / nalla (cumecs)

The water will be sourced from Kagina river (5.0 km, E);

Page 17: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-16

28. Ground water potential of the study area

There are no wells or tube wells in the lease area, so it was not possible to get pre and post monsoon water levels in the lease area. Minimum and maximum depth of water table based on observations from the nearby wells and water bodies is 30 m (370 MSL) to 45 m (355 MSL) from general ground level (400 MSL). During the plan period workings are proposed upto 390 m RL and from general observations the ground water level is below 350 m RL.

28.1. Ground water availability

(a) Range of water table (m bgl)

(i) Pre-monsoon (April/May)

• Core Zone

• Buffer zone

(ii) Post-monsoon (November)

• Core Zone

• Buffer zone

(a) Total annual replenishable recharge (million m3/ year) • By ground water table fluctuation method

• By rainfall infiltration factor method

(c) Annual draft excluding estimated draft through mine discharge (million m3/ year)

(d) Estimated draft through mine discharge (million m3/ year)

(e) Net annual ground water availability (million m3/ year)

(f) Stage of ground water development in %

28.2. Water demand - Competing users of the water source

Sr.

No.

Usage Present

Consumption

(m3/day)

Additional

proposed as per

local plan

(m3/day)

Total (m3/day)

Surface Ground Surface Ground Surface Ground 1 Domestic

2 Irrigation 3 Industry 4 Mining

5 Others (specify)

125 m3/day of water will be sourced from existing allocation from Kagina river.

Total

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Page 18: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-17

29. Water quality*

(a) Annex physico-chemical analysis of water at intake point ** Annexure-IX (b) In case of existing mine, annex report on quality of water discharge

i.e. complete physico - chemical analysis** [*For non-discharging mines at least four ground water samples to be taken preferably from downstream direction of the mine in pre-monsoon and post-monsoon periods and analysed. For discharging mines six samples are to be analysed] **All parameters as per BIS 10500. Indicate name of Methodology, Equipment used for analysis, and Detection Level (DL) for each parameter. *** Wherever any analytical parameter is below detection level, “BDL” (Below Detection Level) should be written instead of ‘NIL’.

30. Impact on ground water regime / stream / lake / springs due to mine

dewatering *

(a) Radius of influence (in m) [To be estimated based on analysis of pumping test data and application of empirical formula]

(b) Whether saline water ingress will take place? Yes No (applicable to coastal areas) (c) Impact on stream / lake / springs Ground water characteristics in the study area given in Annexure-IX

[* Provide a comprehensive hydro-geological assessment report if the average mine dewatering is more than 100 m3/day and or going below water table in non-monsoon period. The report should be based on preferably latest one year pre-monsoon and post-monsoon baseline data covering information on ground water situation, aquifer characteristics, water level conditions (April – May and November), estimate of ground water resources, predicted impact of the project on ground water regime and detailed remedial / conservation measures such as artificial recharge of ground water etc. The report should be based on actual field inventory out of existing wells, at least 30 observation wells in the buffer zone with supplementary information from secondary sources (mention name). For estimation** of ground water resource (refer question no. 28 above) be designated study area of the buffer zone may be sub-divided into command and non-command areas, watershed-wise (in case of hard rock / consolidated formations) / block-wise / mandal-wise in case of alluvial / unconsolidated formations)]

[**For estimating ground water resources in the area follow the Ground Water Estimation Committee recommendations of 1997]

Not Applicable

Page 19: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-18

31. Waste Water Management

Mine

(a) Daily average discharge (m3/day) from different sources

(i) Mine water discharge during

• Lean period • Monsoon period

(ii) Workshop

(iii) Domestic (mine site) (iv) Beneficiation / Washeries

(v) Coal Handling Plant

(vi) Tailings pond

(vii) Others (Specify)

Total

(b) Waste water treatment plant; flow

sheet for treatment process attached. Yes No

(c) Quantity of water recycled / reused / to be recycled in

(i) Percentage 100%

(ii) m3 /day

(d) Point of final discharge No discharge of wastewater

Final Point Quantity discharged (in m3/day)

1. Surface (i) Agricultural land (ii) Waste land (iii) Forest land (iv) Greenbelt

-- -- -- --

2. River / nallah Nil 3. Lake Nil 4. Sea Nil 5. Others (specify) Nil

Total Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Page 20: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-19

(e) Users of discharge water

(i) Human Yes No

(ii) Livestock Yes No

(iii) Irrigation Yes No

(iv) Industry Yes No

(v) Others (specify) (f) Details of the river / nalla, if final effluent is / will be discharged (cumecs) Not Applicable

(i) Average flow rate

(ii) Lean season flow rate

(iii) Aquatic life

(iv) Analysis of river water 100 meters Yes No

upstream and 100 meters downstream of discharge point submitted.

Township :

(a) Waste water generation from township (m3/day)

No waste water generated from this mine lease.

(b) Are you planning to provide sewage Yes No treatment plant?

(c) Usage of treated water Utilized for greenbelt development and dust suppression

32. Attach water balance statement in the form of a flow diagram indicating

source (s), consumption (Section-wise) and output.

Refer Annexure–X

33. Ambient noise level leq dB(A) Refer Annexure–XI

Location of sampling

station

Noise level

Day Time Night Time

A. Core Zone CN1 CN2

B. Buffer Zone BN1 BN2

-

-

-

-

Page 21: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-20

34. Solid Waste

(a) Top soil and Solid waste quantity and quality

Name

(Lump/fines/slurry/ Sludge/others)

Composition Quantity

(m3)

Method of disposal

Mining Activity * a. Top Soil There is no waste handling during the plan period expect top

soil. 1.128 million m3 Top Soil (during plan period) will be generated which will be utilized for formation of bund on 7.5 m safety zone and temporarily stacked over an area of 8.50 ha.

b. Over burden

c. Others (specify) -- -- Effluent Treatment Plant (sludge)

-- -- --

Total -- -- --

[* Annex layout plan indicating the dump sites.]

(b) (i) Does waste (s) contain any hazardous/toxic substance/

radioactive materials or Yes No heavy metals?

(ii) If yes, whether details and Yes No

precautionary measures provided?

(c) Recovery and recycling possibilities. Not Applicable (d) Possible user(s) of the solid waste. Not Applicable

(e) (i) Is the solid waste suitable for backfilling? Yes No

(ii) If yes, when do you propose

to start backfilling.

(in million m3) Solid waste (s) Already

accumulated (A)

To be generated*

(B)

% of A & B to be

backfilled

A B

Over burden

- - - -

Others (specify)

- - - -

* Overburden generated will be for the life of the mine

Land reclamation Plan

(f) In case waste is to be dumped on the ground, indicate

(i) Associated environmental problems : Not Applicable

(ii) Number & type of waste dumps

• No. of external dumps

- [

Nil

Page 22: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-21

• Max. projected height of dumps (in m)

• No. of terraces and height of each stage

• Overall slope of the dump (degree)

• Proposed reclamation measures : Reclamation and rehabilitation work will be taken up along with mining. Plantation scheme will be taken up systematically with soil binding grasses and shrubs and followed by trees plantation, below the mines road (slopes), along the mines road, mines office premises, crusher and adjoining areas.

(iii) Section of the waste dump in relation to the adjacent ground profile attached. Yes No

35. Fuel / Energy requirements*:

[*To be furnished for mines having ML area more than 25 ha. or captive power generation of 500KVA and above]

(a) Total power requirement:

(in MW) S. No. Mine Site Township Others

(specify) Total

1 Present - - - - 2 Proposed /

additional 2 MW 2 MW

Total 2 MW - - 2 MW

(b) Source of power: (in MW)

S.

No.

SEB/Grid* Captive power plant DG Sets

1 Present - - 2 Proposed Power requirement will be met from KSEB

(Karnataka State Electricity Board) grid and CPP of cement plant

-

Total - - - [* Annex a copy of the sanction letter from the concerned authority]

(c) Details of fuels:

S. No. Fuel Daily Consumption

(KDL)

Calorific

value

(Kcals/kg)

% Ash % Sulphur

Existing Proposed

1 2 3

HSD LSHS Other (specify)

- - -

- - -

- - -

- - -

- - -

Nil

Nil

-

Page 23: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-22

36. Storage of inflammable / explosive materials: Not Applicable

S. No. Name Number of

Storages

Consumption

(in TPD)

Maximum Quantity

at any point of time

1 Fuels - - -

2 Explosives

- - -

37. Human Settlement

Core Zone Buffer Zone

Population* Nil 182109

No. of villages Nil 38

Number of households village-wise

Nil 1 district Gulbarga District

[* As per 2011 census record or actual survey] 38. Rehabilitation & Resettlement (R&R) Plan*

[*Provide a comprehensive rehabilitation plan, if more than 1000 people are likely to be displaced, other-wise a summary plan]

(a) Villages falling within the study area:

Villages

Number Name

Core zone Nil Nil 500 m from the blasting site (s)

Nil Nil

Buffer zone 38 1 district Gulbarga District

Township site - - (b) Details of village(s) in the core zone: Not Applicable, no villages in core zone

Sr. No. Village name

Population* Average Annual Income

Tribal Others

[*As per 2011 census / actual survey]

(c) Population to be displaced and / or Land oustees: Not applicable

Name of village(s) falling within Number of oustees

Land (only)

Homestead (only)

Land and Homestead (both)

Mining Lease - - -

Township Site 1. 2.

- - -

Page 24: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-23

(c) Whether R&R package has been finalised?

No Rehabilitation of human settlements involved in the proposed mine lease area. Land purchased directly from land owners as per acre rate including compensation with the approval of Government of Karnataka. (i) Site details where the people are proposed to

be resettled & facilities existing / to be created.

(ii) Funds earmarked for compensation package.

(iii) Agency /Authority responsible for their resettlement.

(iv) Time of commencement of resettlement

of Project Affected People (PAP).

(v) Period by which resettlement of PAP will be over.

39. Lease-wise plantation details: Details are enclosed as Annexure-XII

(a) Lease area (in ha.) Existing mine New mine

(i) Area broken up

(ii) To be broken up

(during plan period)

(iii) Area not to be broken-up

(during plan period) (b) Township area (in ha.)

Not Applicable

(c) Area afforested and proposed (in ha.)

Peripheral Dumps Roads Township Others

(i) Existing Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

(ii) Proposed 15 --- 3.5 Nil 92 ha (backfilled & mineral storage area)

(d) No. and type of trees planted and proposed

(i) Existing: • When plantation was started? Month / Year

No. of plant species planted Number saplings (per ha.)

- -

- -

- 48

583.311

-

- -

Page 25: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-24

Survival rate % ● Avg. height

(ii) Proposed

No. of plant species to be

planted

Number of saplings (per ha.)

5000 1000/ha

40. Environmental health and safety

(a) What major health and safety hazards are anticipated? The main health hazards associated in the mining activities are; 1. Respiratory problems due to air borne dust 2. Hearing loss due to noise levels The Safety hazards associated with mining are; Mishaps due to human errors

(b) What provisions have been made/ proposed to be made to conform to health and safety requirements?

Health

Air borne dust will be controlled by regular water sprinkling. Heavy machinery will be provided with closed cabins. Personnel Protective Equipment will be provided like ear muff/pug, safety shoes, helmets and dust masks. Protective maintenance of the HEMM will done periodically to check emissions. Periodical Medical Examination of all employees will be carried out as per the equipments of MMR.

Well-equipped medical center for the workers is proposed. The same facility will be utilized in future also.

Safety

1. Personnel Protective Equipment will be provided to workers 2. All electric equipment will be provided with proper earthing 3. Regular training programs for the workers 4. All the safety measures are taken as per the Mine Act 1952 and rules and

regulations made there under

(c) In case of an existing mine - Not applicable

(i) Comprehensive report on health status of the workers as under the Mines Act. Yes No

(ii) Mineralogical composition of RPM (dust)

• Free silica : • Chromium* (Total as well as Hexavalent) : • Lead** : Not applicable

Page 26: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-25

[* Only for Chromite mines]

[**Only for Base Metal mines]

(d) Information on radiation protection measures, if applicable.

Not Applicable

41. Environmental Management Plan

Salient features of environmental protection measures

Sr.

No.

Environmental issues* Proposed

1 Air pollution

Regular water sprinkling on haul roads and active mine face; Wet drilling; and Greenbelt development

2 Water pollution No trade effluent is generated from the mining activities. Domestic wastewater will utilized for green belt and dust suppression. Check dams will be constructed for the working phase/pit in the downstream for the arrest of silt during rainy seasons.

3. Water conservation

Rainwater harvesting implemented in adjoining part of mine area as catchments. Waste water is utilized for dust suppression and greenbelt development.

4. Noise pollution Greenbelt development in and around the ML area, along the haul roads, Proper maintenance and provision of silencers for noise generating machinery. Operator cabin is provided with acoustic barrier and periodic job rotation will be carried out.

5. Solid waste / Tailings No solid waste generation

6.

Land degradation Mined out area will be backfilled and remaining area converted into water reservoir

7. Erosion & Sediment Not Applicable

8. Top soil The lease area has top soil ranging in thickness from 1.0 to 4.0 m and average thickness is 2.35 m. During the plan period, 1.128 million cum of soil has been estimated to handle. Top soil will be utilized for plantation

9. Ground vibration

Controlled Blasting Technique, NONEL using hole-to-hole delay is used.

Utilising Instantel Blastmate (vibration measuring

instrument) to measure the ground vibration during blasting.

The blasting is being done as per the advice of CMRI.

No Secondary blasting.

10. Wildlife conservation Not Applicable

11. Forest protection Not Applicable

12. Others (specify) Not Applicable

[* As applicable]

Page 27: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-26

42. Compliance with environmental safeguards (For existing units)

Applicable

(a) Status of the compliance of conditions of Environmental clearance issued by MoEF, Yes No if any, enclosed.

(b) Status of the compliance of ‘Consent to Operate’ issued by SPCB, if any, enclosed. Yes No

(c) Latest 'environmental statement' enclosed. Yes No

43. Scoping of EIA: Refer Annexure -XIII

Whether environmental impact assessment of the project has been carried out by Yes No following scoping process? If yes, a copy of scoping of EIA Yes No annexed.

44. Mine closure : Refer Annexure-XIV

(a) Have you planned mine closure? Yes No (b) Submitted a conceptual mine Yes No

closure plan. (c) If yes, indicate estimated amount for implementing the same (in Rs. lakhs) 45. Capital cost of the project (Based on latest estimate)

46. Cost of environmental protection measures, as enclosed Annexure-XV

(in Rs. Lakh) Sr.

No.

Particulars Capital

Cost

Recurring

Cost

1 Air quality monitoring and management 2 Water quality monitoring &

management 3 Greenbelt Development/ Plantation 4 Occupational health Monitoring

Total

47. Amount earmarked for socio-economic welfare measures for the nearby

villages other than R&R plans.

JCCL has already taken up various activities, as a part of CSR, for upliftment of

surrounding areas of existing cement plant and mines. Rs.150 crores is allotted

for CSR activities by JCCL as a part of integrated project. Out of Rs. 150 Crores,

Rs. 1.50 crores is allocated under proposed mine project. An amount of Rs.

30 Crores

--

Page 28: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-27

111.252 lakhs has been incurred so far for the community welfare activities.

Existing CSR activities will be strengthened further under proposed project.

48. Public Hearing

Public hearing details are given in Annexure-XVI.

(a) Date of Advertisement (b) Newspapers in which the advertisement appeared (c) Date of public hearing (DD/MM/YYYY) (d) Public Hearing Panel chaired by & members present

(e) No. of people attended the public hearing meeting

and number of people from the lease area. (f) Summary/details of public hearing in tabular form.

Issues raised by the Public

Response/Commitment of Project Proponents

Suggestions made by the Public Hearing Panel

49. Whether the following approvals* (wherever applicable) have been

obtained?

(i) Site clearance from MoEF Yes No (ii) ‘Consent for Establishment’ from the

State Pollution Control Board Yes No (iii) NOC from Atomic Mineral Division Yes No

(iv) Mining plan approval from IBM /

Ministry of Coal Yes No (v) In case of existing mines, mining scheme approval from IBM Yes No

(vi) Forestry clearance under FCA, 1980 Yes No (vii) NOC from Chief Controller of Explosives Yes No

9th July, 2016

9th August 2016

Deccan herald and Vijaykarnataka in Kannada

---

Page 29: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-28

Page 30: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-29

ANNEXURE-I

STUDY AREA MAP (10 KM RADIUS)

Page 31: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-30

ANNEXURE-II

CORE ZONE & BUFFER ZONE LIST OF FLORA AND FAUNA

LIST OF FLORA OBSERVED IN THE CORE ZONE

Sr. No. Scientific Name Common Name Family

Trees

1 Acacia nilotica Babul Mimosaceae 2 Azadirachta indica Spinous Kino Tree Phyllanthaceae 3 Prosopis juliflora Vilayati Babul/ Sarkar

Thumma Mimosaceae

4 Ipomea pres caprae Railway weed Convolvulaceae Grasses 5 Achyranthes aspera Prickly Chaff flower Amaranthaceae 6 Zizyphus jujuba Berry Rhamnaceae

LIST OF FAUNAL SPECIES RECORDED IN CORE AREA

Sr.

No

Scientific Name Common Name Conservation Status as

per Indian Wildlife (Protection), Act, 1972

1 Corvus splendens House crow Sch-V 2 Columbia livia Rock Pigeon Sch-V 3 Oriolus oriolus Indian Oriole Sch-IV 4 Sturnus pagodarum Brahminy Myna Sch-IV 5 Acridotheres tristis Common myna Sch-IV 6 Ploceus philippinus Weaver bird Sch-IV 7 Passer domesticus House Sparrow Sch-IV 8 Alcedo atthis Common Kingfisher Sch-IV 9 Bubulcus ibis Cattle Egret Sch-IV 10 Ardeola grayii Pond Heron Sch-IV 11 Egretta garzetta Little Egret Sch-IV Reptiles 1 Calotes versicolor Common garden lizard Sch-IV Amphibians 1 Rana hexadactyla Frog Sch-IV 2 Rana tigrina Bull frog Sch-IV Mammals 1 Funambulus palmarum Three Striped Squirrel Sch-IV 2 Herpestes edwardsii Common mongoose Sch-IV 3 Lepus nigricollis Indian Hare Sch-IV

LIST OF THE FLORA OF THE BUFFER ZONE OF THE STUDY AREA

Sr. No. Scientific Name Common Name Family Name

Trees 1 Acacia auriculiformis Australian Acacia Mimosaceae 2 Acacia nilotica Babul Mimosaceae 3 Acacia chundra Chundra Mimosaceae 4 Vitex negundo Nirgundi Verbenaceae 5 Acacia ferrugenia Lakkigida Mimosaceae 6 Ailanthus excelsa Kudrebevu/ Mahanimb Meliaceae 7 Albizzia lebbeck Bage Mimosaceae 8 Anogeissus latifolia Dindiga Combretaceae 9 Annona reticulate Rampal Annonaceae 11 Azadirachta indica Neem/Bevu Meliaceae 12 Butea monosperma Muthuga/Palash Fabaceae 13 Citrus sp Nimbe Rutaceae 14 Ficus benghalensis Ala Moraceae 15 Ficus religiosa Arali Moraceae 16 Dodonea viscoa Banarike Sapindaceae 17 Chloroxylon swietenia Mashiwal Meliaceae 18 Emblica officinalis Nelli/Amla Euphorbiaceae 19 Gliricidia sepium Gobbaraa Gidda Papilionaceae 20 Holoptelia integrifolia Tapasi/Nemalinara Urticaceae

Page 32: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-31

Sr. No. Scientific Name Common Name Family Name

21 Mangifera indica Mavu/Mango Anacardiaceae 22 Pongamia pinnata Karanj Fabaceae 23 Proposis juliflora Simejali/Mesquite/Thum

ma Mimosaceae

24 Syzgium cumnii Neralu/Jamun Myrtaceae 25 Wrightia tinctoria Hali Apocynaceae 26 Tamarindus indica Hunise Cesalpinaceae 27 Phoenix dactylifera Ichalu; Khajur Palmae 28 Samanea saman Rain tree Ceasalpinaceae Shrubs, Herbs, Climbers and Grasses 29 Calotropis gigantea Ekkada gidda Asclepidiaceae 30 Cymbopogon coloratus Poaceae Bodha grass 31 Euphorbia tirucalli Kalli Euphorbiaceae 32 Cassia auriculata Thangadi Casealpinaceae 33 Lantana camara Lantana Verbenaceae 34 Musa paradisica Banana Musaceae 35 Optunia dillenii Cactaceae Papakalli 36 Zizyphus jujuba Ber/Bare hannu Rhamnaceae 37 Tridax procumbens Mexican daisy Asteraceae 38 Argemone mexicana Mexican poppy Papaveraceae 39 Cynodon dactylon Nut grass Poaceae 40 Cajanus cajan Red Gram Fabaceae 41 Oryza sativa Rice /Paddy Poaceae/Graminae 42 Decalepsis hamiltonii ** Makali beru/ Vagani

beru Apocynaceae

43 Andropogon sorghum Sorghum/Jowar Graminae 44 Bambusa bamboos Bans Poaceae

** - Endangered and Endemic Climber.

FAUNA FROM BUFFER ZONE

Sr. No. Scientific Name Common Name Conservation as per WPA (1972)

AVES

1 Dicrurus adsimilis Black drongo Sch-IV 2 Pycnonotus cafer Red-Vented bulbul Sch-IV 3 Gallinago gallinago Common snipe Sch-IV 4 Ocyceros birostris Common grey Horn bill Sch-IV 6 Caprimulgus asiaticus Common Indian Nightjar Sch-IV 7 Alcedo atthis Small blue king fisher Sch-IV 8 Streptopelia chinensis Spotted dove Sch-IV 9 Bulbulcus ibis Cattle-Egret Sch-IV 10 Acridotheres ginginianus Bank Myna Sch-IV 11 Passer domesticus House sparrow Sch-IV 12 Bubo bubo Eurasian eagle owl Sch-IV 13 Anas crecca Cotton teal Sch-IV 14 Tyto alba Barn Owl Sch-IV 15 Corvus macrorhynchos Indian Jungle crow Sch-IV 16 Gallus sonneratii Grey jungle Fowl Sch-II 17 Gallus gallus Red jungle Fowl Sch-IV 18 Columbia livia Blue-rock pigeon Sch-V 19 Egretta gularis Indian Roof Heron Sch-IV 20 Dendrocopos mahrattensis Yellow fronted wood Pecker Sch-IV 21 Egretta garzetta Little Egret Sch-IV 22 Corvus splendens House crow Sch-V 23 Eudynamys scolopaeca Koel Sch-IV 23 Lonchura punctulata Spotted Munia Sch-IV

24 Acridotheres tristis Indian myna Sch-IV 25 Sarkidiornis melanotos Comb duck Sch-IV 26 Coracias benghalensis Blue jay (Roller)/Indian Roller Sch-IV 27 Dendrocygna javanica Lesser whistling Teal Sch-IV 28 Merops orientalis Small Green Bee-eater Sch-IV 29 Motacilla cinerea Grey wagtail Sch-IV 30 Motacilla maderaspatens Large pied wag-tail Sch-IV 31 Sacrogyps calvus King vulture Sch-IV 32 Anthene brama Spotted Owl Sch-IV

Page 33: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-32

Sr. No. Scientific Name Common Name Conservation as per WPA (1972)

AVES

33 Hirundo smithi Wire-tailed Swallow Sch-IV 34 Himantopus himantopus Black Winged Stilts Sch-IV 35 Lanus vittatus Bay-backed Shrike Sch-IV 36 Francolinus pondicerianus Grey Francolin Sch-IV 37 Anas clypeata Shovellar Sch-IV 38 Psittacula krameri Rose-Ringed Parakeet Sch-IV 39 Perdicula asiatica Jungle Bush Quail Sch-IV 40 Coturnix coromandelica Rain Quail Sch-IV 41 Ploceus philippinus Baya weaver bird Sch-IV 42 Fulica atra Eurasian Coot Sch-IV 43 Himantopus himantopus Black-winged Stilt Sch-IV 44 Apus affinis House Swift Sch-IV 45 Vanelleus indicus Red –Wattled Lapwing Sch-IV

Mammals 1 Macaca mullata Rhesus Macaque (Red faced

Monkey) Sch-II

2 Presbytis entellus Common Langur Sch-II 4 Bandicota bengalensis Field Rat Sch-V 3 Funambulus pennanti Five Striped Squirrel Sch-V 4 Lepus nigricololis Indian hare Sch-IV 5 Vulpes bengalensis Indian Fox Sch-II 6 Herpestes edwardsii Common mongoose Sch-II Reptiles 1 Naja naja Cobra-Naja tripadians Sch-II 2 Varanus benghalensis Monitor Lizard Sch-II 3 Ptyas mucosus Rat snake Sch-II 3 Vipera russellii Russel’s viper Sch-II 4 Bungarus caeruleus The common krait Sch-II

Page 34: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-33

AUTHENTICATION OF FLORA AND FAUNA

Page 35: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-34

Page 36: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-35

Page 37: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-36

Page 38: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-37

Page 39: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-38

Page 40: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-39

Page 41: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-40

Page 42: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-41

Page 43: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-42

ANNEXURE-III

GEOLOGICAL PLAN

Page 44: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-43

ANNEXURE-IV

GEOLOGICAL SECTIONS

Page 45: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-44

ANNEXURE-V SITE SPECIFIC WINDROSE

(DECEMBER 2015 - FEBRUARY 2016)

Parameters Pre Monsoon Season 2015

First Predominant Wind Direction E (27.9 %) Second Predominant Wind Direction

NE (19.3 %)

Third Predominant Wind Direction SE (7.3 %) Predominant Wind Speeds (kmph) 1.0 – >19 kmph Calm Conditions 16.7 (%)

SUMMARY OF THE METEOROLOGICAL DATA GENERATED AT SITE

Month Temperature (0C) Relative Humidity (%)

Rainfall (mm)

Atmospheric Pressure (mb)

Min Max Min Max Min Max

December, 2015 20.3 31.2 33 58 -- 961.3 965.4 January, 2016 18.1 32.4 29 55 -- 960.8 964.9 February, 2016 22.2 33.6 26 45 -- 959.1 963.5 Range 18.1 – 33.6 26 - 58 -- 959.1 – 965.4

C-16.7%

N 3

.6%

NN

E 1

.7%

NE 19.

3%

ENE 2.5%

E 27.9%

ESE 1.9%

SE 7.3%

SS

E 1.7%S

5.2%

SS

W 1

.1%

SW 2

.8%WSW 1.2%

W 3.4%

WNW 0.9%

NW 1.3%

NN

W 1.5%

CALMSPEED

SCALE 5%

1.0 5 11 19 >19 Km/hr

Page 46: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-45

ANNEXURE-VI AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA

DETAILS OF AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING

Station Code

Name of the Station Distance (km) Direction Environmental Setting w.r.t. ML Area

AAQ1 ML site (core area) - - - AAQ2 Kirni village 4.5 W Downwind AAQ3 Near Telgul village 5.2 NW Crosswind AAQ4 Muthur village 4.8 N Crosswind AAQ5 Dewan Tegnur village 4.2 NE Upwind AAQ6 Taranhalli village 1.0 E Upwind AAQ7 Shahabad Town 1.7 SE Crosswind AAQ8 Near Tonsanhalli village 0.5 SW Downwind

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY LOCATION MAP

C-16.7%

N 3

.6%

NN

E 1

.7%

NE 19.

3%

ENE 2.5%

E 27.9%

ESE 1.9%

SE 7.3%

SS

E 1.7%S

5.2%

SS

W 1

.1%

SW 2

.8%

WSW 1.2%

W 3.4%

WNW 0.9%

NW 1.3%

NN

W 1.5%

CALMSPEED

SCALE 5%

1.0 5 11 19 >19 Km/hr

Page 47: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-46

SUMMARY OF AMBIENT AIR QUALITY RESULTS

Station Code

Locations PM2.5 (µµµµg/m3) PM10 (µµµµg/m3) SO2 (µµµµg/m3) NOx (µµµµg/m3)

Min Max Avg 98th

%le Min Max Avg 98th

%le Min Max Avg 98th

%le Min Max Avg 98th

%le

AAQ1 Mine Area 10.4 14.6 12.5 14.4 23.1 37.0 32.1 36.6 7.8 8.9 8.2 8.8 9.6 10.7 10.1 10.7 AAQ2 Kirni Village 11.3 15.4 13.3 15.2 20.9 28.6 24.7 28.2 7.5 9.6 8.7 9.5 9.7 11.8 10.6 11.8 AAQ3 Near Telgul Village 11.4 15.5 13.5 15.3 21.6 35.0 26.5 34.3 8.2 10.3 9.4 10.2 9.3 12.4 11.0 12.4 AAQ4 Muthur Village 13.7 17.6 15.7 17.4 26.9 34.6 30.7 34.2 8.7 10.8 9.9 10.7 10.5 13.6 12.2 13.6 AAQ5 Dewan Tegnur Village 11.9 15.1 13.1 14.7 23.8 30.1 26.2 29.4 9.9 12.3 11.0 12.1 11.8 14.1 12.8 14.1 AAQ6 Taranhalli Village 15.2 26.0 22.3 25.5 35.1 47.3 43.5 46.8 10.2 13.1 11.7 12.8 12.2 14.8 13.5 14.8 AAQ7 Shahabad Town 24.1 30.0 26.9 29.5 38.3 52.0 45.7 51.0 11.1 13.7 12.4 13.6 13.9 16.2 15.1 16.2 AAQ8 Tonsanhalli Village 11.1 15.2 13.1 15.0 20.5 35.0 26.4 34.1 8.2 9.3 8.7 9.3 9.2 11.3 10.2 11.3 Study area Range 10.4 – 30.0 20.5 – 52.0 7.5 – 13.7 9.2 – 16.2

Station Code

Locations CO (µµµµg/m3) O3 (µµµµg/m3)

Min Max Avg 98th

%le Min Max Avg 98th

%le

AAQ1 Mine Area 219 290 250 290 1.3 6.1 3.4 5.9 AAQ2 Kirni Village 223 360 290 351 1.7 5.2 3.2 5.1 AAQ3 Near Telgul Village 228 329 277 327 2.3 6.9 4.3 6.5 AAQ4 Muthur Village 238 355 308 354 2.2 6.4 4.3 6.1 AAQ5 Dewan Tegnur Village 246 315 278 315 2.1 6.7 4.1 6.5 AAQ6 Taranhalli Village 231 348 274 344 1.5 6.7 4.0 6.6 AAQ7 Shahabad Town 267 383 337 382 2.5 7.1 4.8 6.8 AAQ8 Tonsanhalli Village 225 292 264 290 1.8 6.4 4.1 5.6

Study area Range 219 - 383 1.3 – 7.1

Page 48: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

A-47

SUMMARY OF AMBIENT AIR QUALITY RESULTS

SUMMARY OF AMBIENT AIR QUALITY RESULTS

Station

Code

Locations As (µg/m3) Ni (µg/m3) C6H6 (µg/m3)

Min Max Avg 98th

%le

Min Max Avg 98th %le Min Max Avg 98th

%le

AAQ1 Mine Area <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 AAQ2 Kirni Village <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 AAQ3 Near Telgul Village <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 AAQ4 Muthur Village <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 AAQ5 Dewan Tegnur Village <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 AAQ6 Taranhalli Village <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 AAQ7 Shahabad Town <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 AAQ8 Tonsanhalli Village <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Range <0.001 <0.001 <0.01

Station Code

Locations Ammonia, NH3 (µµµµg/m3) Pb (µg/m3) Bap (ng/m3)

Min Max Avg 98th

%le Min Max Avg 98th

%le Min Max Avg 98th

%le

AAQ1 Mine Area <20.0 <20.0 <20.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 AAQ2 Kirni Village <20.0 <20.0 <20.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 AAQ3 Near Telgul Village <20.0 <20.0 <20.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 AAQ4 Muthur Village <20.0 <20.0 <20.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 AAQ5 Dewan Tegnur Village <20.0 <20.0 <20.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 AAQ6 Taranhalli Village <20.0 <20.0 <20.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 AAQ7 Shahabad Town <20.0 <20.0 <20.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 AAQ8 Tonsanhalli Village <20.0 <20.0 <20.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Range <20.0 <0.001 <0.01

Page 49: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-48

ANNEXURE-VII

EMISSION FACTORS FOR MINING OPERATIONS USED FOR MODELLING

Activities / Operations Units Emission Factors

Top soil removal by ripper gm/m 0.623 Drilling gm/sec 0.720 Blasting gm/sec 2.190 Loading to tippers excavator gm/sec 0.005 Dumper/ tipper unloding OB gm/sec 0.005 Bulldozing of OB gm/sec 0.025 Loading ore to dumper/ tipper gm/sec 0.012 Dumper/ tipper unloading ore gm/sec 0.018 Wheel generated dust on haul road

gm/m 0.560

Source: SP Benerjee, Minetech, Volume - 27

PREDICTED 24-HOURLY SHORT TERM INCREMENTAL GLC’S

Pollutant Incremental Level (At ML boundary without control measures) µg/m3

Direction

PM10 8.3 W

Page 50: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-49

ANNEXURE–VIII

WATER ALLOCATION LETTER

Page 51: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-50

Page 52: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-51

Page 53: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-52

Page 54: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-53

Page 55: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-54

Page 56: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-55

ANNEXURE–IX

WATER SAMPLING LOCATIONS

Code Location Distance (km) Direction

Ground Water

GW1 Mine Area -- -- GW2 Kirni 4.5 W GW3 Near Telgul 5.2 NW GW4 Muthur 4.8 N GW5 Dewan Tegnur 4.2 NE GW6 Taranhalli 1.0 E GW7 Shahabad 1.7 SE GW8 Tonsanhalli 1.7 SW

Surface Water

SW1 Nandana Halla u/s 2.6 E SW2 Kagna River d/s 4.2 SE

WATER SAMPLING LOCATIONS

Page 57: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-56

GROUNDWATER QUALITY

Sr. No.

Parameters IS:10500 Limits Units GW1 GW2 GW3 GW4

1 pH 6.5 – 8.5 (NR) - 7.13 7.31 7.29 7.0 2 Colour 5 (25) Hazen 3 2 3 2 3 Taste Agreeable - Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable 4 Odour Agreeable - Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable 5 Conductivity $ uS/cm 850 1293 2005 3142 6 Turbidity 5 (10) NTU 8 4 3 2 7 TDS 500 (2000) mg/l 590 912 1400 2120

8 Total Hardness as CaCO3

300 (600) mg/l 340 215 275 580

9 Total Alkalinity 200 (600) mg/l 360 395 505 625 10 Calcium as Ca 75 (200) mg/l 114 46 46 162 11 Magnesium as Mg 30 (100) mg/l 13.4 24.3 38.9 42.5 12 Residual Chlorine 0.2 min mg/l <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 13 Boron as B 1 mg/l 0.21 0.68 0.80 0.68 14 Chlorides as Cl 250 (1000) mg/l 7.8 24.2 121.9 357.3 15 Sulphates as SO4 200 (400) mg/l 10.4 111.6 133.1 229 16 Fluorides as F 1.0 (1.5) mg/l 0.7 1.4 1.3 0.5 17 Nitrates as NO3 45 (NR) mg/l 43.8 105.6 213 236.5

18 Phenolic Compounds

0.001 (0.002) mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

19 Cyanides as CN 0.05 (NR) mg/l <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

20 Anionic Detergents

0.2 (1.0) mg/l <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

21 Mineral Oil 0.1 (0.03) mg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 22 Cadmium as Cd 0.003 (NR) mg/l <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 23 Arsenic as As 0.01 (0.05) mg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 24 Copper as Cu 0.05 (1.5) mg/l 0.02 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 25 Lead as Pb 0.05 (NR) mg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 26 Manganese as Mn 0.1 (0.3) mg/l 0.09 0.01 <0.01 0.08 27 Iron as Fe 0.3 (NR) mg/l 0.32 0.26 0.18 0.13 28 Chromium as Cr+6 0.05 (NR) mg/l <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 29 Selenium as Se 0.01(NR) mg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 30 Zinc as Zn 5 (15) mg/l 3.2 0.17 0.03 8.2 31 Aluminum as Al 0.03 (0.2) mg/l 0.09 0.04 0.09 0.086 32 Mercury as Hg 0.001 (NR) mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 33 Pesticides Absent mg/l Absent Absent Absent Absent 34 E. Coil Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent 35 Total Coliforms 10 MPN/100 ml <2 <2 <2 <2

GROUNDWATER QUALITY (Contd…….)

Sr.

No Parameters

IS:10500 Limits Units GW5 GW6 GW7 GW8

1 pH 6.5 – 8.5 (NR)

- 7.06 7.37 7.14 7.92

2 Colour 5 (25) Hazen 5 4 6 5 3 Taste Agreeable - Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable 4 Odour Agreeable - Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable 5 Conductivity $ uS/cm 1375 901 1856 550 6 Turbidity 5 (10) NTU 2 6 5 9 7 TDS 500 (2000) mg/l 962 610 1235 365

8 Total Hardness as CaCO3

300 (600) mg/l 360 260 335 160

9 Total Alkalinity 200 (600) mg/l 450 350 505 200 10 Calcium as Ca 75 (200) mg/l 112 48 38 32 11 Magnesium as Mg 30 (100) mg/l 19.4 34 58.3 19.4 12 Residual Chlorine 0.2 min mg/l <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 13 Boron as B 1 mg/l 0.25 0.27 0.76 0.13 14 Chlorides as Cl 250 (1000) mg/l 56.9 19.9 150.3 28.4 15 Sulphates as SO4 200 (400) mg/l 55.4 25.6 157.4 27.8

Page 58: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-57

Sr.

No Parameters

IS:10500 Limits Units GW5 GW6 GW7 GW8

16 Fluorides as F 1.0 (1.5) mg/l 0.6 1.2 1.3 0.4 17 Nitrates as NO3 45 (NR) mg/l 113.4 44.1 43.9 1.6

18 Phenolic Compounds

0.001 (0.002) mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

19 Cyanides as CN 0.05 (NR) mg/l <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

20 Anionic Detergents

0.2 (1.0) mg/l <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

21 Mineral Oil 0.1 (0.03) mg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 22 Cadmium as Cd 0.003 (NR) mg/l <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 23 Arsenic as As 0.01 (0.05) mg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 24 Copper as Cu 0.05 (1.5) mg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 25 Lead as Pb 0.05 (NR) mg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 26 Manganese as Mn 0.1 (0.3) mg/l <0.01 <0.01 0.3 0.01 27 Iron as Fe 0.3 (NR) mg/l 0.13 0.18 0.27 0.5 28 Chromium as Cr+6 0.05 (NR) mg/l <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 29 Selenium as Se 0.01(NR) mg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 30 Zinc as Zn 5 (15) mg/l 0.27 0.06 0.07 0.12 31 Aluminum as Al 0.03 (0.2) mg/l 0.04 0.06 0.05 0.18 32 Mercury as Hg 0.001 (NR) mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 33 Pesticides Absent mg/l Absent Absent Absent Absent 34 E. Coil Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent 35 Total Coliforms 10 MPN/100 ml <2 <2 <2 <2

SURFACE WATER QUALITY

Sr. No Parameters Units SW1 SW2

1 pH - 7.67 7.88 2 Colour Hazen 5 4 3 Conductivity µS/cm 572 563 4 TDS mg/l 375 370 5 DO mg/l 5.9 5.7 6 BOD mg/l <3 <3 7 COD mg/l 20 40 8 Total Hardness as CaCO3 mg/l 165 165 9 Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 mg/l 200 205 10 Calcium as Ca2+ mg/l 32 34 11 Magnesium as Mg2+ mg/l 20.7 19.4 12 Chlorides as Cl mg/l 34.0 31.2 13 Residual free Chlorine mg/l <0.2 <0.2 14 Phosphates as PO4 mg/l <0.1 <0.1 15 Sulphates as SO4

2- mg/l 30.3 25.0 16 Fluorides as F- mg/l 0.5 0.4 17 Nitrates as NO3 mg/l 1.0 1.5 18 Sodium as Na mg/l 52.3 50.9 19 Potassium as K mg/l 3.2 2.5 20 Total Boron as B mg/l 0.13 0.13 21 Phenolic Compound as C6H5OH mg/l <0.001 <0.001 22 Cyanide as CN- mg/l <0.02 <0.02 23 Oil and Grease mg/l <1.0 <1.0 24 Cadmium as Cd mg/l <0.01 <0.01 25 Arsenic as As mg/l <0.01 <0.01 26 Copper as Cu mg/l 0.01 <0.01 27 Lead as Pb mg/l <0.01 <0.01 28 Iron as Fe mg/l 0.13 0.24 29 Chromium as Cr+6 mg/l <0.05 <0.05 30 Selenium as Se mg/l <0.01 <0.01 31 Zinc as Zn mg/l 0.02 0.04 32 Aluminium as Al mg/l 0.05 0.09 33 Mercury as Hg mg/l <0.001 <0.001 34 SAR - 1.77 1.72 35 Insecticides mg/l Absent Absent 36 Anionic detergents as MBAS mg/l <0.1 <0.1 37 Total Coliforms MNP/100ml 10 8

Page 59: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-58

ANNEXURE–X

WATER BALANCE DIAGRAM

Mine Pit

Mining Operations

Dust Suppression

Greenbelt

125

30 60 25

All Values are in m3/day

Potable Water

10

Septic Tank/Sock

Pit

8

Page 60: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-59

ANNEXURE-XI

DETAILS OF NOISE MONITORING LOCATIONS

Location

Code

Location Distance

(Kms) Direction Zone

N1 Mine Area -- -- Industrial N2 Kirni 4.5 W Rural / Residential N3 Near Telgul 5.2 NW Rural / Residential N4 Muthur 4.8 N Rural / Residential N5 Dewan Tegnur 4.2 NE Rural / Residential N6 Taranhalli 1.0 E Rural / Residential N7 Shahabad 1.7 SE Rural / Residential N8 Tonsanhalli 0.5 SW Rural / Residential

NOISE LEVELS IN THE STUDY AREA

Code Location L10 L50 L90 Leq Lday Lnight Ldn N1 Mine Area 47.3 43.6 40.0 44.5 45.1 41.9 48.9 N2 Kirni 49.6 45.8 42.3 46.7 47.3 44.3 51.3 N3 Near Telgul 48.8 45.2 41.5 46.1 46.6 43.6 50.6 N4 Muthur 49.1 45.5 41.8 46.4 46.9 43.9 50.9 N5 Dewan Tegnur 48.6 44.7 40.9 45.7 46.7 42.8 50.0 N6 Taranhalli 47.9 44.2 40.6 45.1 47.6 44.4 51.4 N7 Shahabad 52.5 48.9 45.2 49.8 50.3 47.2 54.2 N8 Tonsanhalli 49.6 45.8 42.3 46.7 45.6 42.7 49.7

Page 61: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-60

NOISE MONITORING LOCATIONS

Page 62: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-61

ANNEXURE-XII

PLANTATION PROGRAMME

The details of year wise proposed plantation on safety zone/ bund during the plan period.

PROPOSED PLANTATION & BUND DETAILS

Period (Yr.)

Bund Formation on Safety Zone (m)

Proposed Plantation Area No of plants

Location Name of Species

1 1500 1.00 1000 Bund on safety zone

Neem, Jamun, Tamarind, Jali, Subabu and other species

2 5170 1.00 1000 3 - 1.00 1000 4 - 1.00 1000 5 - 1.00 1000

Total 6670 5.00 5000

Source: Mine Plan

Page 63: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-62

ANNEXURE-XIII

SCOPING OF EIA

1.0 Introduction

It is very important to understand the present environmental status of the study area before assessment of the impact of the proposed project on the surrounding area. This helps to choose the right approach in conducting the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study, which can address the problems associated with the project. The steps followed in the preparation of EIA are:

1. Review of existing data base since it is an operating mines 2. Review of literature related to project 3. Study of technical aspect of project and identification of pollution sources 4. Determination of baseline conditions 5. Impact prediction based on scientific and mathematical tools 6. Preparation of EMP

1.1 Basis of Scoping

The scoping of EIA has been done considering the pollution in the area and potential polluting sources of the proposed project. In this mining project, the pollution related to air quality, water quality and noise has been considered to be critical attributes.

1.2 Present Environmental Status

There is a cement plant and other mines within 10 km radial distance from the mine lease boundary. There are no ecological sensitive areas like bird sanctuaries, wild life sanctuaries, biosphere etc and archaeological monuments within 10-km radial distance from the mine lease boundary.

1.3 The Sources of Pollution from Mines

The main sources of pollution from mine are air pollution, water and noise pollution. � Air Pollution

The sources contributing to air pollution in the mine activities are:

° Blasting ° Drilling ° Excavation ° Loading and unloading of ore and overburden ° Transportation of ore and overburden on the haul roads

The above sources mainly contribute to the suspended and Respirable particulate matter. The contribution to the gaseous pollutants is limited. � Water Pollution No process wastewater generation is envisaged in the mine operation. � Noise Pollution

The mining activities are the main sources of noise generation that may contribute to the ambient noise level.

Page 64: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-63

1.4 Scoping of EIA

The outline of the EIA was prepared based on the existing environmental status of the study area and proposed pollution emissions from the mining project.

As per the ministry guidelines, buffer zone radial distance from the mine lease boundary and the area falling within the mine lease area is considered as core zone. The primary data related to various attributes were generated in buffer as well as core area. The critical environmental attributes, which need to be monitored, are ambient air quality, water quality, noise monitoring and ground vibration.

The environmental attributes considered for monitoring are;

1. Meteorology

Meteorological parameters like wind speed, wind direction, temperature and rainfall, which are required in prediction of air quality impacts are recorded at site.

2. Ambient Air Quality

The mining activity mainly contributes to PM as well as RPM of the ambient air quality and these were considered for monitoring to assess the present concentration in the ambient air quality. The parameters considered for the assessment of ambient air quality are:

• Particulate Matter; • Respirable Particulate Matter; • Sulphur dioxide; • Oxides of Nitrogen; and • Carbon monoxide (CO)

3. Water Quality

The mine operates on zero discharge condition and no wastewater is discharged outside the premises of mine. The water quality at ten locations in and around the mine area is considered. The seasonal water samples are collected to understand the seasonal changes in the water quality. The water quality are compared with IS 10500.

4. Noise Levels

The mining activities contribute to increase in noise levels. To assess the impact of noise on the surrounding villages, noise levels need to be monitored at 8 locations falling under different land use categories.

5. Geology & Hydro-geology

The data related to geology and hydro-geology is required to understand the mine water discharge due to mining activity. The available data from Ground Water Board is collected in this regard.

6. Environmental Management Plan

The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is required to be prepared for the systematic monitoring of environmental attributes.

7. Risk Assessment & Disaster Management Plan (DMP)

The Risk Assessment and Disaster Management Plan are required to be prepared in case of emergency.

Page 65: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-64

ANNEXURE-XIV

FINANCIAL AREA ASSURANCE PLAN

Page 66: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-65

ANNEXURE-XV

BUDGETARY ALLOCATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

As environmental protection will be monitored and implemented by a centralized environmental management cell, the fiscal estimates have been arrived for the mining activity, which is shown in the below table. JCCL is proposed to spend about Rs 35 lakhs towards environmental protection measures.

BUDGET PROVISION FOR EMP IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING

Sr. No

Particulars Expenditure (Rs. Lakhs)

1 Mitigation measures to control Air & water pollution & environmental monitoring

17

2 Occupational Heath & Safety 10 3 Green belt / afforestation 3 4 Engineering constructions like wall, check dam, garland drain,

settling tank 5

Sub Total 35

Page 67: PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/EC/... ·  · 2016-10-07PROFORMA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING

Q-66

ANNEXURE-XVI

SUMMARY OF MAIN ISSUES RAISED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING