progress in characterizing amoc structure and variability from observations
DESCRIPTION
Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations. Bill Johns RSMAS, University of Miami, Miami FL Outline : An AMOC tour from the subpolar gyre to the South Atlantic How to move forward in directly observing the AMOC What have we learned in the last ~5 years?. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Progress in Characterizing AMOC Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Structure and Variability from
ObservationsObservations
Bill Johns Bill Johns
RSMAS, University of Miami, Miami FL
OutlineOutline: :
1.1. An AMOC tour from the subpolar gyre to the South An AMOC tour from the subpolar gyre to the South Atlantic Atlantic
2.2. How to move forward in directly observing the AMOCHow to move forward in directly observing the AMOC
3.3. What have we learned in the last ~5 years?What have we learned in the last ~5 years?
![Page 2: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
AMOC Observational Network
International ProgramsU.S. Programs
![Page 3: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Nordic Seas Overflows
Quadfasel and Käse (2007)
Based on Hansen et al. (2007), Macrander et al. (2005), and updates
![Page 4: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Nordic Seas Overflows (modeled)
Olsen et al. (2008)
Blue = obs. Red = model Total overflow
Faroe Bank
Faroe Bank Channel
Model hindcast of Faroe Bank overflow during the observational record (top), and for the last 50 years (right). Total Nordic Sea overflow shown in green (right).
![Page 5: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Entrainment into the overflows
Dickson and Brown (1994)
LSW 4 Sv
![Page 6: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
DWBC Measurements at Cape Farewell
Bacon and Saunders (2010)
Mean transport = 8.6 Sv (σθ > 27.80)
![Page 7: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Bacon (1998)
Historical DWBC Measurements at Cape Farewell
Baroclinic transport relative to 1000 db
Mean: 5.5 Sv
![Page 8: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Historical DWBC Measurements at Cape Farewell (updated)
Sarafanov et al. (2009)
Baroclinic transport anomaly relative to mean value of 5.5 Sv
![Page 9: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Summary of LNADW (DSOW/ISOW) Transports
Haine at el. (2008)
------- 9 Sv
![Page 10: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Kieke et al. (2006)
Labrador Sea Water Formation Rates
LSW Production estimates: 2-10+ Sv (Haine et al., 2008)
CFC 11/12 Tracer Inventories (1970-1997):
Average cLSW production: 4.4 – 5.6 Sv Average uLSW production: 3.2 – 3.3 Sv Average total LSW production: 7.6 – 8.9 Sv
![Page 11: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Kieke et al. (2007)
Labrador Sea Water Formation Rates (’97-’03)
97-99 99-01 01-03
uLSW cLSW
![Page 12: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Lumpkin et al. (2008)
MOC: 16.2 Sv Mean UNADW: 7.1 Sv Mean LNADW: 9.1 Sv
Export to the Subtropics (48ºN)
![Page 13: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
1. Increasing evidence that overflows are stable (over the modern record, last 50 yrs)
2. DWBC at Cape Farewell (overflows+entrainment) is variable on decadal timescales; mean transport of ISOW/DSOW ~9 Sv (not 13 Sv). Varies by ±30%.
3. LSW production constrained by tracer inventories. Recent biennial surveys resolve temporal variability of formation. Mean LSW production 7.6-8.9 Sv (1970-97), Highly variable. Cycling between cLSW/uLSW, linked to NAO forcing.
4. Export to subtropics in MOC (at 48N): 16.2 ± 2.0 Sv (1993-2000). Relatively stable (recently). LSW: 7.1± 1.4 Sv; LNADW: 9.1± 1.7 Sv.
Summary for Subpolar region:
![Page 14: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
RAPID/MOCHA 26.5°N Array
Florida Current Monitoring by undersea cable (Baringer and Larson, 2001)
Western Boundary array (Johns et al., 2008)
Mid-ocean Array
(Cunningham et al., 2007)
![Page 15: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
MOC streamfunction and layer transports (Rapid Array 26.5ºN)
MOC: 18.5 Sv
UNADW: 8.2 Sv LNADW: 12.3 Sv
uLSW 2.8 Sv
cLSW 5.4 Sv
ISOW 4.8 Sv
DSOW 7.5 Sv
AABW 2.1 Sv
![Page 16: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Contributions to northward flowing (upper ocean) part of AMOC cell
MOC variability range: 5-30 Sv
AMOC Variability at 26.5ºN
Kanzow et al. (2010)
![Page 17: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
MOC and Heat Transport Variability
3.5 year mean MOC: 18.5 ± 4.9 (3.8*) Sv (σerr = 2.1 Sv)
mean MHT: 1.33 ± 0.40 (0.24*) PW (σerr = 0.12 PW) *with contribution by Ekman transport variability removed
![Page 18: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Contributions to northward flowing (upper ocean) part of AMOC cell
AMOC variability spectrum at 26.5ºN
Kanzow et al. (2010)
![Page 19: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
AMOC seasonal cycle and seasonal contributions to upper ocean part of AMOC cell
The interior transport (TUMO) cycle can be explained by linear, forced Rossby wave response to wind stress curl, contained mostly in eastern basin
AMOC seasonal cycle at 26.5ºN
Kanzow et al. (2010)
![Page 20: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Bryden (2005) MOC values after application of seasonal correction
Kanzow et al. (2010)
26.5ºN in perspective
CCSP (2008): Abrupt Climate Change
Synthesis model ensembleSynthesis model ensemble
![Page 21: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
“SAMOC” Program
MOC and MHT estimates at 35ºS (AX18)
South Atlantic
![Page 22: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
17 transects (2002-2007): Mean MOC: 17.9 ± 2.2 Sv Mean MHT: 0.55 ± 0.14 PW
South Atlantic (35ºS)
Dong et al. (2009)
![Page 23: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Complex AMOC structure in South Atlantic (relative to N. Atlantic subtropics):
• Eddy transport processes important in both upper and lower limbs
• Contributions of warm/salty (Agulhas) and cool/fresh (AAIW/SAMW) to the upper limb
• Interaction of DWBC with equator; interior NADW pathways; deep water mass transformation
AMOC Pathways/Processes
Lumpkin and Speer (2007)
Schematic: R. Lumpkin NOAA/AOML
![Page 24: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
AMOC streamfunction in density coordinates
NADW Transformation in S. Atlantic
Lumpkin and Speer (2007)
![Page 25: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Establish discrete set of trans-basin arrays (moorings + autonomous profiling) for continuous AMOC estimates
Value:
• Accurate multi-year mean AMOC estimates, for comparison with future (and past) AMOC states
• Understanding of processes underlying short-term (intraseasonal to annual) variability
• Benchmarks for evaluation of modeled AMOC variability (GCMs, data synthesis models)
AMOC Monitoring Strategy
Lumpkin and Speer (2007)
O-SNAPO-SNAP
RAPIDRAPID
MOVEMOVE
SAMOCSAMOC
![Page 26: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
AMOC Variability at 41ºN from ARGO/altimetry
Profiling Floats and AMOC Monitoring
Willis (2010)
![Page 27: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
1. Increasing evidence that overflows are stable (over the modern record, last 50 yrs). -> Denmark Strait and Iceland-Faroes Ridge monitoring remains challenging.
2. Mean transport of ISOW/DSOW at Cape Farewell appears to be ~9 Sv (not 13 Sv). Varies by ±30% on decadal timescales. -> Entrainment variability? LSW “blocking” at Gibbs?
LSW production can be temporally monitored by transient tracers. Mean LSW production 7.6-8.9 Sv (1970-97). Cycling between cLSW/uLSW, w/ link to NAO forcing. -> How to monitor going forward (SF6 )? Pathways of export to the subtropics?
LSW makes up nearly half of the deep limb of the AMOC. 48ºN: LSW: 7.1 Sv; DSOW/ISOW: 9.1 Sv. 26ºN: LSW: 8.2 Sv; DSOW/ISOW (minus AABW): 10.2 Sv. -> How are variations in LSW production reflected in export to subtropics? Modulating/buffering processes?
What have we learned in the past ~5 years?
![Page 28: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
1. Large short-term (intraseasonal to annual) MOC variability in subtropics. Ekman forcing dominates at intraseasonal; geostropic variability dominates on longer time scales (annual+). Annual MOC cycle documented and its fundamental mechanism explained.
2. AMOC snapshots derived from single hydrographic sections can be subject to considerable aliasing. The interior baroclinic flow cannot be assumed steady. The Bryden (2005) “trend” can be largely explained by seasonal aliasing.
3. MOC strength is fairly uniform throughout the basin. (16-18 Sv). Minor “internal” closure. -> How does the partitioning of internal components vary? uLSW/CLSW? Agulhas leakage vs. AAIW?
4. Complex NADW transformation processes in the S. Atlantic. DWBC eddies; interior pathways -> eastern boundary “DWBC”. Significant upward shift in mean density of NADW limb. -> Equatorial mixing/deep jets?
What have we learned in the past ~5 years?
![Page 29: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
![Page 30: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
1. Response of MOC to variation in deep water formation rates (convective + overflow)? - LSW formation rates have large interannual variation (and still disagreement on the “mean” formation rate). How are these variations connected to export, and MOC variability? - New results (Bacon and Saunders, 2010) call into question accepted magnitude of DSOW/ISOW entrainment and DWBC flux at Cape Farewell – while sill overflows appear ~steady. Does this imply a reduction in LNADW limb of AMOC? What is the “transfer function” between overflows and LNADW part of MOC? Is it stable/robust?
Questions/Issues on Variability:
![Page 31: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
2. Inter-gyre AMOC coherence/connectivity? - Models suggest “breakpoints” in AMOC coherence at certain latitudes. Where and for what time scales? Mechanisms?
Questions/Issues on Variability:
Bingham et al. (2007)
HadCM3 (coupled) OCCAM (forced)
![Page 32: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
3. Inter-hemispheric (and global) AMOC coherence/connectivity? - Role of “equatorial buffer” in AMOC meridional coherence? - Influences arising from S. Atlantic (e.g. change of partitioning between warm/cold routes)? Changes external to Atlantic?
Questions/Issues on Variability:
Johnson and Marshall (2002)
HadCM3
l
Dong and Sutton (2003)
![Page 33: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
4. Can we devise a long-term strategy for observing coherent modes of interannual/decadal variability?
Questions/Issues on Variability:
Bingham et al. (2007)
HadCM3
Forced
Bentsen et al. (2004)
Coupled
![Page 34: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
5. Are we prepared to observe and document anthropogenically- forced AMOC changes?
Questions/Issues on Variability:
IPCC/AR4 A1-B
scenario runs
(Schmittner et al., 2005)
![Page 35: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Discussion…
![Page 36: Progress in Characterizing AMOC Structure and Variability from Observations](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56815a83550346895dc7f266/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Atlantic MOCECCO-SIO
ECCO-50y
ECCO-GODAE
ECCO-JPL
INGV
SODA
GFDL