progress in ipv6 deployment

37
Progress in IPv6 Deployment Marco Hogewoning RIPE NCC

Upload: ripe-ncc

Post on 14-Dec-2014

783 views

Category:

Technology


5 download

DESCRIPTION

Presentation given by Marco Hogewoning at: IPv6 task force 11th meeting, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia on 16 May 2012

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Progress in IPv6 DeploymentMarco Hogewoning

RIPE NCC

Page 2: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

Because everybody likes statistics

Page 3: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

IPv6 RIPEness

• Rating system designed to monitor progress in the deployment of IPv6

• Four “stars” to earn, based on the level of deployment:– First star for getting an IPv6 allocation

– Subsequent stars awarded for visibility, route objects and reverse DNS

• Only lists RIPE NCC members

3

Page 4: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

Middle East Region (September 2011)

4

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

AE(19)

BH (24)

IQ(22)

IR(104)

JO(35)

KW(32)

LB(29)

OM(5)

PS(17)

QA(6)

SA(61)

SY(13)

TR(126)

YE(2)

No IPv6 1 star 2 star 3 star 4 star

Page 5: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

Middle East Region (May 2012)

5

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

AE(20)

BH (22)

IQ(32)

IR(119)

JO(33)

KW(29)

LB(29)

OM(4)

PS(18)

QA(7)

SA(62)

SY(11)

TR(136)

YE(2)

No IPv6 1 star 2 star 3 star 4 star

Page 6: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

Saudi Arabia Over Time

6

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

05-10 08-10 11-10 02-11 05-11 08-11 11-11 02-12 05-12

No IPv6 1 star 2 star 3 star 4 star

Page 7: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

Saudi Arabia Over Time (linear)

7

0

14

28

42

56

70

05-10 08-10 11-10 02-11 05-11 08-11 11-11 02-12 05-12

No IPv6 1 star 2 star 3 star 4 star

Page 8: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

Saudi Arabia Over Time (linear)

8

0

6

12

18

24

30

05-10 08-10 11-10 02-11 05-11 08-11 11-11 02-12 05-12

4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star

Page 9: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

RIPE NCC Service Region over time

9

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

05-10 08-10 11-10 02-11 05-11 08-11 11-11 02-12 05-12

No IPv6 1 star 2 star 3 star 4 star

Page 10: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

Is this really slowing down?

Page 11: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

IPv6 Allocations by the RIPE NCC

11

Page 12: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

How about non-members?

Page 13: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

Autonomous Systems and IPv6

13

http://v6asns.ripe.net

Page 14: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

...one more graph

Page 15: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

RIPE NCC IPv4 Pool

15

Page 16: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

Is the IPv6 adoption rate slowing down?

Page 17: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Update From the RIPE NCC

Page 18: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

Policy Changes

• Recent changes on IPv6:– IPv6 PI multihoming requirement got removed

– Minimum initial allocation size changed to /29

• Ongoing discussion about IPv4:– Reserve some IPv4 address space for IXPs

– Provider Independent (PI) assignments from last /8

– Inter RIR Address Transfers

18

Page 19: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

PI Assignments from Final /8?

• When the RIPE NCC reaches the final /8:– Every member can get one /22 (1024 addresses)

– If you already have IPv6

– If you can prove you need them

• Policy does not allow for PI assignments

• Policy proposal 2012-04:– Change the final /8 policy

– Allow for a /24 PI from the final /8

19

Page 20: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

IPv4 Address Transfer

• We have a transfer policy for within the service region:– Members can transfer addresses to each other

– If they are not in use

– If the receiving party has a justified need

– Minimum size is /21

• Somebody proposed to allow transfers to and from the RIPE NCC Service region as well

20

Page 21: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

Inter RIR Transfer Proposal

• Original proposal received a lot of comments– People didn’t like the idea of selling addresses

– People didn’t like inter RIR transfers at all

• Original proposal was revoked

• New proposal was drafted:– Allow for Inter RIR Transfers to/from RIPE NCC

– If it matches the transfer policy of the loosing RIR

– If the recipient qualifies for an address allocation according to the policy of the receiving RIR

21

Page 22: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

Fixing the Current Transfer Policy

• To qualify for a transfer you have to match exactly the same rules as for a regular allocation– Evaluation period is 3 months

• This was an unintended side effect of the “run out fairly” proposal which lowered this value– It used to be 24 months

• Proposal to change it back to 2 years in case of address transfers

22

Page 23: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

Join the Discussion

• Tell other people what you think about this

• Join the discussion on the mailing list:– [email protected]

–Warning: you can only post after you are subscribed!

23

http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/current-proposals

Page 24: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Outreach and Capacity Building

Page 25: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

Activities towards IPv6 Adoption

• Outreach/PR:– Publishing Articles

– Brochures

– Website: http://www.ipv6actnow.org

– Dedicated contact point: [email protected]

• Capacity Building– Training courses

– IPv6 Roadshow (together with MENOG)

– Conferences

25

Page 26: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

Training

• RIPE NCC “IPv6 for LIRs Training Course”– One day training

– Mix of technical and RIPE NCC related topics

• MENOG IPv6 Roadshow– 3 or 5 day training course

– Learn how to configure IPv6 in your network

26

Page 27: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

Training Locations 2010/2011

27

Page 28: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

Training Locations 2012

28

IPv6 training course

Roadshow

Roadshow

Roadshow

Page 29: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

Document Ripe-501

• Document contains an overview of what to ask for when requesting IPv6 support in equipment

• Useful for tenders and RFPs

• Best Current Practice

• Update is expected in a few weeks– Will get a new document number

29

http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-501

Page 30: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Outreach

Page 31: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

Outreach Activities

• Recently participated in Palestine IPv6 Forum

• CITC IPv6 Workshops

• MENOG Conference

• Government Roundtables

• First Arab IGF in Kuwait, October 2012

31

Page 32: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

TRA Orientation at the RIPE NCC

• Staff from all Telecommunications Regulatory Authorities (TRA) from the Middle East will visit RIPE NCC for a 3 day orientation

• Formal proposal approved by GCC - Council of Ministers in February 2012

• Will cover IPv6 amongst other things

32

Page 33: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

Summary

• We reach out to a lot of people:– Members of the RIPE NCC

– Network operators

– Governments

– Regulators

– Law enforcement agencies

33

Page 34: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

What should be the next step?

Page 35: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

World IPv6 Launch

• Initiative taken by ISOC, Google, Akamai, Cisco, Microsoft, XS4ALL, Comcast and a lot of others

• RIPE NCC participates in doing measurements

• Switch on IPv6 on 6-6-2012– And leave it on

• www.worldipv6launch.org

35

Page 36: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

Who else to talk to?

• IPv6 adoption rate seems to be slowing down– Did we get all the “low hanging fruit”?

– Did we really reach all operators?

– Will Launch Day make the difference?

• How to get the other 60% to start with IPv6?

• What about your customers?– Enterprises

– Residential users

36

Page 37: Progress in IPv6 Deployment

Marco Hogewoning, CITC, May 2012

How can we help you?