project 3 final report perspectives of gulf of maine

21
Bycatch Consortium – Final Report # NA10NMF4520343 73 Project 3 Final Report Perspectives of Gulf of Maine Lobster Fishermen on Reducing Large Whale Entanglements Heather Tetreault, Maine Lobstermen’s Association Kate McClellan, Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction Introduction The endangered North Atlantic right whale, Eubalaena glacialis, has a current population of approximately 526 individuals (Pettis and Hamilton, 2015). Entanglement in fishing gear has been identified as one of the main threats to this species (Kraus et al 2005), causing an average of observed mortality of 1.5 individuals per year from 2001-2010 (Waring et al 2008; Waring et al 2010; Waring et al 2013). Ropes recovered from entangled right and humpback whales found along the east coast of the United Stated and Canada have been identified as lobster pot/trap gear and gillnet gear in 80% of the cases in which the gear type could be determined (Johnson et al 2005). The four parts of fixed fishing gear most commonly involved in entanglements were found to be: buoy line (also known as the vertical line), groundline, floatline, and surface system lines (Johnson et al 2005). An analysis of 626 right whale photographs taken from 1980 to 2009 suggests that at least 83% had been entangled at least once and 59% had been entangled more than once (Knowlton et al 2013). These authors also found that the percentage of animals observed each year with rope on the body increased significantly during the study period, implying that it is becoming more difficult for whales to free themselves from fishing gear. The Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan, intended to reduce the incidental mortality and serious injury of North Atlantic right, humpback, and fin whales, informs regulatory actions for commercial trap/pot and gillnet fishing activity in the region (NMFS 2002). The plan addresses fixed gear fisheries from Maine to Florida. All trap/pot fishermen in northern inshore state waters of Rhode Island, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Maine must comply with measures to reduce the risk of fishing gear to whales, including: rigging without the buoy line floating at the surface; hauling gear at least once every 30 days (no wet storage); marking surface buoys; rigging buoys, floatation devices, and/or weights attached to the buoy line with a weak link having a breaking strength no greater than 600 lbs; fishing groundline made of sinking line; and gear marking. Some exceptions to these rules apply within an exemption zone approximately equivalent to 2nm offshore from the nearest landmass in Maine state waters. Fishermen are also encouraged to maintain knot-free buoy lines. Restricted Areas (Cape Cod Bay, Stellwagen Bank Jeffrey’s Ledge, and Great

Upload: others

Post on 14-Feb-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

BycatchConsortium–FinalReport#NA10NMF452034373

Project3FinalReport

PerspectivesofGulfofMaineLobsterFishermenonReducingLargeWhaleEntanglements

HeatherTetreault,MaineLobstermen’sAssociation

KateMcClellan,ConsortiumforWildlifeBycatchReductionIntroductionTheendangeredNorthAtlanticrightwhale,Eubalaenaglacialis,hasacurrentpopulationofapproximately526individuals(PettisandHamilton,2015).Entanglementinfishinggearhasbeenidentifiedasoneofthemainthreatstothisspecies(Krausetal2005),causinganaverageofobservedmortalityof1.5individualsperyearfrom2001-2010(Waringetal2008;Waringetal2010;Waringetal2013).RopesrecoveredfromentangledrightandhumpbackwhalesfoundalongtheeastcoastoftheUnitedStatedandCanadahavebeenidentifiedaslobsterpot/trapgearandgillnetgearin80%ofthecasesinwhichthegeartypecouldbedetermined(Johnsonetal2005).Thefourpartsoffixedfishinggearmostcommonlyinvolvedinentanglementswerefoundtobe:buoyline(alsoknownastheverticalline),groundline,floatline,andsurfacesystemlines(Johnsonetal2005).Ananalysisof626rightwhalephotographstakenfrom1980to2009suggeststhatatleast83%hadbeenentangledatleastonceand59%hadbeenentangledmorethanonce(Knowltonetal2013).Theseauthorsalsofoundthatthepercentageofanimalsobservedeachyearwithropeonthebodyincreasedsignificantlyduringthestudyperiod,implyingthatitisbecomingmoredifficultforwhalestofreethemselvesfromfishinggear.TheAtlanticLargeWhaleTakeReductionPlan,intendedtoreducetheincidentalmortalityandseriousinjuryofNorthAtlanticright,humpback,andfinwhales,informsregulatoryactionsforcommercialtrap/potandgillnetfishingactivityintheregion(NMFS2002).TheplanaddressesfixedgearfisheriesfromMainetoFlorida.Alltrap/potfishermeninnortherninshorestatewatersofRhodeIsland,Connecticut,Massachusetts,NewHampshire,andMainemustcomplywithmeasurestoreducetheriskoffishinggeartowhales,including:riggingwithoutthebuoylinefloatingatthesurface;haulinggearatleastonceevery30days(nowetstorage);markingsurfacebuoys;riggingbuoys,floatationdevices,and/orweightsattachedtothebuoylinewithaweaklinkhavingabreakingstrengthnogreaterthan600lbs;fishinggroundlinemadeofsinkingline;andgearmarking.Someexceptionstotheserulesapplywithinanexemptionzoneapproximatelyequivalentto2nmoffshorefromthenearestlandmassinMainestatewaters.Fishermenarealsoencouragedtomaintainknot-freebuoylines.RestrictedAreas(CapeCodBay,StellwagenBankJeffrey’sLedge,andGreat

SouthChannel)haveadditionalrestrictionsonweaklinksandthenumberoftrapsandendlinespertrawlduringcertaintimesoftheyear.In2015,additionalregulationswereimplementedthatincludeexpandedgearmarking,aseasonalclosureoffofMassachusetts,andaminimumnumberoftrapspertrawlbasedonareafished,inordertoreducetheoverallnumberofverticallines(NMFS,2015).Since2005,theConsortiumforWildlifeBycatchReduction(“BycatchConsortium”)hasbeentestingmodifiedfishinggearsuchasabrasion-resistantgroundlines,glowrope,weakrope,stiffrope,redrope,andtime-tensionlinecutterswithlobstermenandinthelab,hasmodeledwhaleentanglementscenariosusingcomputersimulation,andhassupportedresearchtolearnmoreaboutrightwhalevisualperception.Thepurposeoftheseprojectshasbeentoidentifywaystoreduceinteractionsandentanglementsinvolvinglobsterfishinggearandwhales,whilemaintainingpracticalfishingmethodsandlobstercatchrates.Manyoftheseprojectshavebeenconductedincollaborationwithlobstermen,specificallybytestingmodifiedfishinggear.TheMaineLobstermen’sAssociation(MLA),amemberoftheBycatchConsortium,hasengagedlobstermeninconversationstoidentifyinnovativeyetpracticalfishinggearandmethodsthathavepotentialforpreventinglargewhaleentanglements.Aspastbycatchreductioneffortshaveshown,fishermen’sunderstandingoftheproblemisimportantforidentifyingsolutionsandadoptingnewtechniques(see,forexample,discussionofshrimptrawlfishermenandtheadoptionofseaturtleexclusiondevices(TEDs)inTuckeretal[1997]).Cooperativefisheriesresearchhasmanybenefits,including:helpingfishermenandscientistsbecomemoreinformedandappreciativeabouteachother’sexpertise;makingfishermenmorelikelytoacceptthecredibilityofscientificobservations;andpromotingthelikelihoodoflastingpartnerships(HartleyandRobertson2006).Recognizingthis,theMLAandtheBycatchConsortiumorganizedaseriesofmeetingsoverseveralyearsto1)developacommonlanguagebetweenscientistsandlobstermenforcommunicatingtheproblemofrightwhaleentanglements,3)discusspastbycatchmitigationresearchandresults,and4)provideopportunitiesforlobstermentooffertheirinsightsonfishingpracticesandpotentialbycatchmitigationtechniques.Ultimately,thegoalwastoincreasetheinvolvementoffishermeninunderstandingtheentanglementproblemwhilesolicitingtheirinputintoidentifyingsustainablesolutions.Thisreportpresentstheresultsoftheseoutreachactivities.OutreachwithFishermenCreatingaCommonLanguageThefirstgoaloftheBycatchConsortiumandMLAwastocreatearesourceforscientists,lobstermen,policymakers,andotherinterestedpartiesthatexplainedthediverserangeoffishinggearandtechniquesusedthroughouttheGulfofMaine.In2010,lobstermenwereinvitedtoparticipateinoneof39meetingsheldalongthecoastofMainetocharacterizethefishinggearandtechniquesusedbytheircommunity(Table1).Meetingswereheldinalllobstermanagementzones(Figure1)

BycatchConsortium–FinalReport#NA10NMF452034375

aswellasinNewHampshireandMassachusetts;over150activelobstermenintotalattendedthesemeetings.Fishermenwereaskedtodocument(drawandlabel)theindividualcomponentsandriggingoftheirlobstergear.TheMLAcollecteddrawingsfrom115lobstermen.Thedescriptionsanddrawingsincludedthesizeandnumberoftraps,weightandballast,brand,size,andlengthoflines,typesofflotationdevices,andmethodsofrigginggear.Table1.MLAoutreachmeetingstocharacterizefishingmethodsanddiscusswhalebycatchmitigation.Date MeetingLocation Date MeetingLocation2.23.10 ZoneB,District2-7 5.13.10 ZoneE,District9-103.5.10 ZoneB,District2 5.13.10 ZoneC,District23.15.10 ZoneG,District6-7 5.19.10 ZoneF,District13.22.10 ZoneG,District1-3 5.20.10 ZoneF,District53.23.10 ZoneD,District3 5.26.10 ZoneD,District1-23.25.10 ZoneF,District8-9 5.27.10 ZoneF,District74.5.10 ZoneA,District1-2 6.1.10 ZoneC,District94.5.10 ZoneA,District3-4 6.2.10 ZoneD,District124.6.10 ZoneA,District5-6 6.7.10 ZoneD,District114.6.10 ZoneA,District7-8 6.16.10 ZoneG,District4-54.6.10 ZoneB,District5 8.7.10 ZoneC,District24.7.10 ZoneC,District1-2 12.14.10 ZoneA,District64.7.10 ZoneC,District3-4 12.15.10 ZoneD,District3-44.7.10 ZoneC,District5 1.25.11 ZoneB,District54.8.10 ZoneD,District7 3.31.11 ZoneG,District1-34.8.10 ZoneD,District6

2.11MassachusettsLobstermen’sAssociationAnnualWeekend

4.9.10 ZoneD,District8-10

4.29.10 ZoneG,District8-9 2.11 MLADirectorsMeeting4.30.10 ZoneG,District10-11 3.11 MaineFishermen’s

Forum5.4.10 ZoneD,District10-11

4.11MassachusettsLobstermen’sAssociationDelegatesMeeting

5.5.10 ZoneD,District5

5.6.10 ZoneF,District2 4.11 NewHampshireRegionalMeeting5.11.10 ZoneE,District5-8

Lobstermenwerealsoaskedtodescribetheirfishingarea’senvironmentalconditions,includingtides,currents,andbottomhabitat;thelengthoftheactivefishingseason;depthsfished;theaveragesoaktime;thenumberoftrapspertrawl;numberofbuoylines(endlines);vesselsize;andnumberofcrewmembers.Someofthesecharacteristicschangeoverthecourseoftheseason,solobstermendocumentedhow,when,andwheretheychange.

Figure1.MeetinglocationsinMainetocollectdataongearconfigurations.Afterthisinformationwascollectedandsummarized,itwasreviewedforaccuracybylobstermen,includingtheMLA’sBoardofDirectors.A33-pageillustratedreportwasproducedwithin-depthdescriptionsofthefishinggearandtechniquesusedineachZoneoftheGulfofMaine(McCarronandTetreault2012,AppendixE).Thisreportcollectedlobstermen’sknowledgeaboutthefishery,illustratedthediversityoffishingmethodsintheGulfofMaine,anddisseminatedterminologyforgearwithpeopleandgroupsinterestedinthelobsterfishery.Itisespeciallyimportantforuseinevaluatingtherelativeimpactsofpotentialgearorregulatorychangesinvolvingfishinggear,bygivingscientists,fishermen,andfisheriesmanageracommonunderstandingabouttherangeoffishingtechniquesusedintheregion.Todate,morethan700copiesofthereporthavebeendistributedtolobstermen,marinemammalandfisheriesscientists,governmentofficials,students,andbusinesses.SharingBycatchKnowledgeThesecondgoalwastocommunicatetheproblemofrightandotherlargewhaleentanglementsinfishinggear,andsharethemitigationresearchcarriedouttodate.InFebruaryandMarchof2012,theBycatchConsortiumandtheMLAhostedsevenhalf-daymeetingsinMachias(ZoneA),BarHarbor(ZoneB),Bucksport(ZoneC),Rockland(ZoneD),Boothbay(ZoneE),Yarmouth(ZoneF),andBiddeford(ZoneG)entitled

BycatchConsortium–FinalReport#NA10NMF452034377

“UnderstandingInteractionsbetweenWhalesandLobsterGear”.Atotalof40lobstermen,scientists,MaineDMRstaff,andreportersattendedthemeetings.TheBycatchConsortiumandtheMLApresentedslideshowsexplainingthepurposeoftheConsortiumandsummarizeditsresearchrelatedtolargewhaleentanglementsandlobsterfishinggear(Table2).TheMLAandtheConsortiumalsohostedahalf-daymeetingatthe2012MaineFishermen’sForumentitled“Howdowhalesgetentangledinfishinggear?Usingreverseengineeringtounderstandwhaleentanglements”.TheBycatchConsortiumandtheMLApresentedslideshowssimilartothosegivenattheZonemeetings.TheseweresupplementedwithinsightsfromtwolobstermenwhohadattendedtheBycatchConsortium’s2011whaleentanglementreverseengineeringworkshop.Lastly,informationboothsstockedwithprojectreports,videos,andimagesweresetupbytheBycatchConsortiumandtheMLAattheMaineFishermen’sForumandtheMassachusettsLobstermen’sAssociationAnnualweekendin2012.Table2.PresentationtopicsgivenateachoutreachmeetingbytheBycatchConsortiumandtheMLA.

• Rightwhalestatusandverticallineruleupdate• WhatistheConsortiumforWildlifeBycatchReduction?• Fieldtestingexperimentalropesandgear(glowrope,stiffrope,weakrope,

etc.)• CharacterizinglobstergearintheGulfofMaine• Makingsinkinggroundlinesmoreworkable• Whatcanwelearnfromentangledwhales?Thedynamicsofwhale

entanglements• Insightsfromropesandwhaleinjuries• Insightsfromdisentanglementeffortsandnecropsycases• Whathappenswhenarightwhaleswimsintofishinggear?Usingmodelsto

simulateentanglements• Reviewingrightwhaleentanglementcasestudiesandthegearremovedfrom

whalesFeedbackfromLobstermenBasedonpresentationsgivenduringthesemeetingsandinformationsharedbylobstermenabouttheirfishingexperiences,theywereaskedtoprovidefeedbackonfishingpracticestheythoughtmightreducetheriskofgeartowhales.Lobstermenidentifiedtwomainchallengesinconsideringthistopic.First,theyhighlightedthattheymainlyworkaloneandthereforedeveloptheirfishingstrategyindependently,includingthenumberoftrapsfished,gearrigging,geardeploymentandwhenandwheretheyfish.Therefore,manywerenotcomfortablediscussingtheirfishingstrategies,particularlyiftheybelievedthesemightbeusedtodevelopgeneralrecommendationsthatmightdictatehowotherlobstermenshouldfishintheGulfof

Maine.Second,arecurringobservationamonglobstermenwasthattheirgearconfigurationshavebeenoptimizedthroughtrialanderrorovermanyyears.Mostlobstermenreportedthattheircurrentfishingpracticesareusedforeaseofoperation,tomaximizecatch,andtoensurethesafetyofthemselvesandtheircrew.Individualismandthebeliefthatfishingpracticeshavebeenperfectedmakeitchallengingtogarnersupportfordiscussionaboutnewgearorfishingtechniques.Lastly,lobstermenexpressedfrustrationwiththeongoingregulatoryprocesssurroundingtheprotectionoflargewhales,whichhascausedchangestothefishery,includingweaklinks,gearmarking,andtheunpopularrequirementtousesinkinggroundlines.Althoughdiscussionsaboutfishingropesandtheirroleinwhaleentanglementscoveredbothverticallinesandgroundline,theFinalReportforBycatchConsortiumProject2(“ReviewofSinkingGroundlinePerformanceintheMaineLobsterFishery,withRecommendationsforImprovingitsFishability”)discussedgroundlinesinfarmoredetail.ResultsLobstermenidentifiedanumberofideasduringthesemeetingsforavoidingorreducingtheseverityofwhaleentanglements.Thesearenotpresentedastheconsensusviewamonglobstermen,butratheralistofthedifferentideasthatemerged.

1. Maximizethenumberoftrapsperendlinetoreducethetotalnumberofendlinesinthewater.

2. Minimizethelengthoffloatinggroundlinebetweentrapsa. Usesinkingropewheneverpossible,eveninsidetheexemptionlineb. Maximizethegear-settingspeedwhendeployingtrapstokeep

groundlinesastautaspossibleonbottom3. Minimizeentanglementriskfromthesurfacesystem

a. Limittheamountofscopeontheverticallineb. Limitthelengthofropefishedbetweenflotationdevicesinthesurface

systemc. Incorporatesmaller,weakerropesonthetopthirdofthebuoylined. Deployonlytheflotationdevicesinasurfacesystem(suchashighflyers,

polyballs,tidebuoysandtoggles)necessarytohaulthegearbasedontheconditionsfished;avoidusingredundantflotationasaprecautionagainstlosinggear

4. Minimizetheuseofknotsandcoilsontheverticallinea. Usesplicingratherthanknotsb. Uselengthenerstoaddandremovescopeofbuoylinewhenshifting

gearratherthancoilingorshankingropewhichcouldinterferewiththeefficacyofthebreakaway

5. Reducegeardensitythroughtrapreductions

BycatchConsortium–FinalReport#NA10NMF452034379

6. Investigatetheuseofstifflineortautline7. Reduceghostgearthroughavarietyofoperationalguidelinesforsinking

groundlinesMaximizenumberoftrapsperendlinetoreduceverticallinesRationaleAnanalysisoffishinggearinvolvedin45rightandhumpbackwhaleentanglementsfoundthatverticallineswerecommonlyinvolvedinentanglementsoflargewhales(Johnsonetal2005).Whenresearcherswereabletoidentifythetypeoflineretrievedfromentangledwhales,in56%ofthecasesitinvolvedverticalline.Giventhatverticallinesposeaseriousthreattowhales,eliminatingthenumberofverticallineswouldbeexpectedtoreducetheriskofwhaleentanglements.NMFSalsobelievesthatreducingthenumberofverticallines,particularlyinareasofhighwhaledensity,couldreduceseriousinjuriesanddeathsoflargewhalesfromentanglementsinfishinggear(NMFS2012).Whatwouldthischangeinvolve?ThereisabroadrangeofgearconfigurationsfishedthroughouttheGulfofMaine.Inmanyinshoreareasshorterstringsofgeararefished,largelyconsistingofsingles,pairsandtriples,generallywithoneendline.IntheMassachusettsOuterCapefishery,singlesarealsofishedwithoneendline.InotherinshoreareasincludingCutler,Boothbay,CascoBay,Kittery,andmostareasofNewHampshireandMassachusetts,longerstringsofgeararefished.TheMaine,NewHampshireandMassachusettsoffshorefisheriesalldeploymuchlongertrawlsof10to40traps,each.Foralobstermanfishingatotalof800traps,achangeingearconfigurationcansignificantlyalterthenumberofendlines.Themoretrapsonatrawl,thefewerthenumberofverticallinesinthewater(Table3).

Table3.Totalnumberofendlinesbasedongearconfiguration(traps/trawl).

Configuration#VerticalLineswith1Endline

#VerticalLineswith2Endlines

Single 800 --Pairs(2) 400 --Triples(3) 267 --4traptrawl 200 --5traptrawl 160 3206traptrawl 133 2668traptrawl 100 20010traptrawl 80 16015traptrawl -- 10620traptrawls -- 80

25traptrawls -- 64

40traptrawl -- 40Table3showsthatlobstermenfishingsinglescanreduceverticallinesby1/2goingtopairs,andby1/3goingtotriples.Lobstermenfishingtriplescanreducethenumberofverticallinesby¼goingtofour-traptrawls.However,atripleslobstermentrawlingupwouldneedtofishmorethansixtrapsonatrawlwithtwoendlinesinordertoseeanyreductioninverticallines.Twoimportantconsiderationsherearethat,first,increasingthenumberoftraps/trawlfrom<5to>5canhavenonetreductioninverticallines,becauselongertrawlsrequiretheadditionofasecondendline.However,ifalobstermanisalreadyusingtwoendlinesbutthenaddsmoretraps/trawl,theremaybeanincentivetoincreasethestrengthoftheendlinesused,whichmightreducethechancethatanentangledwhalecanbreakfreeofthegear(Knowltonetal.,2015).Manyfactorsmustbeconsideredwhencontemplatingtrawlingupgearsuchastides,bottomcurrents,bottomhabitat,depth,leveloffishingcongestion,boattraffic,vesselsizeandequipment,personalsafety,lobstercatch,andthecultureandtraditionsofthelocalfishery.Manyofthesefactorswilllimitthenumberoftrapsthatcanbesafelyandeffectivelytrawledup.Lobstermenwhohavebeenmostsuccessfulinmaximizingthenumberoftrapsperendlinearetypicallylobstermenwhohaveaminimumvessellengthof32feet,fishwithoneormorecrew,fishinareasofmudorgravelbottom,fishinareasofhighboattraffic,orfishindeeperoffshorewaters.Lobstermenalsoidentifiedissuesrelatedtothewidthofthevesselandthetypeofhaulingequipmentaboardthevesselsasfactorsthatcanlimitthenumberoftrapspertrawlthatcanbesafelyfished.

BycatchConsortium–FinalReport#NA10NMF452034381

Whenfishingtrawlsoftenormoretraps,lobstermenareseldomabletofishwithonlyoneendline.Thisisduetothehighlikelihoodoflosinganendlinebecauseofgearcongestionfromotherlobstermen,boattraffic(particularlyinMassachusetts,NewHampshireandsouthernMainefromAprilthroughSeptember)orfromchafingandhang-downs.Asecondendlinealsoprovideslobstermenwithanalternatewaytohaulthegearifoceanorweatherconditionsmakeitchallengingtohaulfromoneend.Trawlsfishedwithsinkingropeareextremelydifficulttorecoverifbuoylinesbecomeunavailable,becausegroundlinethatrestsontheseafloormakesitvirtuallyimpossibletolocateusingabottomsounder,particularlyinareaswithuneven,ruggedbottom.Lobstermenidentifiedavarietyofspecificreasonsforfishingsingles,pairsandtriples:

• Abilitytotargetrockybottom,holes,crevicesmorestrategicallytomaintainlobstercatchlevels

• Variablebottomhabitat(suchasboulders,rockoutcroppingsandholes)makesitimpossibletoeffectivelysetlongertrawlsontheseabed,especiallyininshoreshallowwater

• Deployingmoretrapsinalargernumberofareasminimizescompetitionbetweentraps

• Smallervesselscan’thandlelargestringsoftrapsondeck• Itissaferforlobstermenwhofishalonebecausethegearfitsmoreeasilyon

deck,anditissaferandmoremanageabletoredeploythegearandmanagetheropeondeck

• Inareaswithahighdensityoffishingeffortandgear,especiallythosewithvariablebottomtype,lobstermenaremorelikelytosetgearoveroneanother,increasingtheprobabilityofgeartanglesandtraploss.However,theseconflictscanbeminimizedwhenlobstermenconsistentlysetgearinthesameorientationinrelationtothetide.

• Singlesarenecessaryinareasaroundislandstomaintainsafetyduetorugged,shallow,androckybottomhabitats.

SupportingevidenceReductioninthetotalnumberofverticallineshaspotentialtoreducetheincidenceofwhaleentanglements,butthenumberofvariablesthatfactorintoentanglementriskaremany,andwhilethemeasuremakesintuitivesense,itisdifficulttopredictitsimpact.Eventhoughverticallineshavebeenidentifiedmorethanotherpartsofgearinwhaleentanglements(Johnsonetal2005),itmaynotbethecasethattheyconstitutethemostriskypartoflobsterpotgear.Verticallinesmayjustbeeasiertorecognize,

becausebuoysorhigh-flyersareattached.Otherlinesdon’talwayshavedistinguishingcharacteristics.Formostentanglements,itisimpossibletodeterminethegearpartinvolved;Johnsonetal(2005)werenotabletoidentify44%ofthegearinvolvedinentanglementevents.ReducefloatinglinebetweentrapsonbottomtoreduceropeprofileRationaleGroundlineisalsoknowntoentanglewhales.Incasesinwhichgearretrievedfromwhaleentanglementscouldbeidentified,Johnsonetal(2005)foundthat28%involvedgroundline.Since2009,governmentregulationsrequirethatanygroundlineusedintheGulfofMaineoutsidetheexemptionlinemustbenegativelybuoyant.WhiletheNationalMarineFisheriesServicehasdeterminedthatthefisheryinsidethislineposesminimalrisktowhalesduetothelackofwhalessightedinthethesewaters,entanglementshavebeenknowntooccurintheseinshorewaters.Wherepositivelybuoyantgroundlineisstillallowed,lobstermenneverthelessrecommendedshorteningitslengthbetweentrapstoreducetheprofileoftheropeinthewatercolumn.Whatwouldthischangeinvolve?In2003,theMaineLobstermen’sAssociationpartneredwiththeMaineDepartmentofMarineResources(DMR)toconductanunderwaterobservationoffloatinggroundlinesineachlobstermanagementzone.Thisstudyprovidedabaselineofthelengthofgroundlinetypicallyfishedbetweentrapsininshorewaters(rangingfrom10to14fathom),anddocumentedtheunderwaterprofileofmanycommonlyusedlines,includinghowtheirhowarcschangeaccordingtogearconfiguration(StockwellandSummers,2008).TheDMRfurtherinvestigatedtheconceptoffishingneutrallybuoyantorlowprofilelinesthroughfieldworkin2005and2006.Thisworkdocumentedthearcheightoflowprofileversusfloatinglinewithvaryinglengthsoflinethroughexperimentalgeardeployments.Whileoverallthestudyshowedthatthearcoflowprofilelineswaslessthanthatoffloatingline,italsomeasuredthedifferenceinprofileoffloatinglinewithdifferinglengthsoflinebetweentraps(Table5).

BycatchConsortium–FinalReport#NA10NMF452034383

Table5.AverageandMaximumHeightsforFloatRopeandLowProfileRope(StockwellandSummers,2008).RopeType N Length

(Fa)Avgarcheight(m)

Maxarcheight(m)

Avgarcheight(ft)

Maxarcheight(ft)

Floatrope 72 18 5.28 11.89 17.33 39.20 72 10 2.99 7.48 9.8 24.54 72 6 2.37 3.80 7.78 12.50LowProfilerope

72 18 0.21 0.90 0.68 2.97

72 10 0.23 0.63 0.75 2.07 72 6 0.43 0.97 1.42 3.20

Thisresearchdemonstratedareductioninthearcofthefloatinglineasthelengthofgroundlineisdecreased.Asignificantreductioninthearcoftheropeinthewatercolumnwasachievedbyshorteninggroundlinesfrom18to10fathoms;theaverageheightofthearcwasreducedby43%(from5.28to2.37meters),andthemaximumarcheightwasreducedby37%(from11.89metersto7.48meters).Whiletherearemanyvariableswhichaffectthearcheightofgroundlineincludingregiondeployedandtautnessofthelinedependingonhowitwasset,overall,theseobservationsindicatethatlobstermencouldreducetheamountoffloatinggroundlineinthewatercolumnbyreducingthelengthoflinefishedbetweentraps.Areductionintheamountofropeinthewatercolumncouldbeachievedbyreducingthelengthoffloatinggroundlinesto10fabetweentraps.SupportingevidenceLobstermenandtheMaineDepartmentofMarineResourceshaveindicatedthatbecausetheNorthernGulfofMaineisrockyandhasextremetides,someflotationisneededingroundlinesforfishingsafetyandoperationalfeasibility(StockwellandSummers2008).Alowerprofilelinewouldbemorelikelytochafeonarockybottomorhangdown.Somelobstermendidindicatethatingeneral,shortergroundlinescanbesuccessfullyfishedinshallower,nearshoreareas.Indeeperwatershowever,theystatedthatlongerlengthsofgroundlineareneededtosafelyhaulatdepthandsuccessfullyfishlongertrawls.RightwhalediveprofilestrackedintheGulfofMainehaveshownthattheyforageveryclosetoorrightagainsttheseafloor(Marsh2005),andtherearemanyphotographicrecordsofrightwhaleswithmudontheirmouths(S.Kraus,pers.comm.).M.WeinrichandD.WileyalsousedinformationfromarchivaltagsonhumpbacksintheGreatSouthChanneltoshowthatthewhalesoftendivetothebottomandthenpropelthemselvesalongtheseabedontheirsidesorupsidedown

withtheirmouthsopen(NMFS2005).Thissuggeststhatreducingtheprofileofthefloatinglinemaynotavoidtheriskofentanglementingroundlinestoforagingwhales,butcouldreduceit.However,ithasalsobeensuggestedthatwhaleforaginginshore,inrockyhabitats,maydifferfromthatobservedfurtheroffshore.Additionalresearchisstillneededtoexaminewhalebehaviorininshorewaters.MinimizeriskfromendlinesandthesurfacesystemRationaleRightwhalesfrequentlyfeedatorjustbelowthesurfaceofthewater(Baumgartner,Mayoetal.2007).Thesurfacesystemoflineshasbeeninvolvedinlargewhaleentanglements(Johnsonetal2005).Lobstermensuggestedreducingtheamountofsurfacegearbyfishingtheminimumamountofropenecessaryfortheendlineandtheminimumamountofropenecessarybetweenflotationdevicesinthesurfacesystemanddeployingonlytheflotationdevicesinasurfacesystem(suchashighflyers,polyballs,tidebuoysandtoggles)necessarytohaulthegearbasedontheconditionsfished.Whatwouldthischangeinvolve?Lobstermennotedthattheyobservesomelobstermenintheirareasfishingmoreropebetweenflotationdevicesatthesurfacethannecessarytosuccessfullyretrievegearunderlocalconditions.Forexample,insomeinstanceslobstermenfish15fathomsoflinebetweenthemarkerandmainbuoys,andmanysuggesteditcouldbereducedto5fathoms.Lobstermenalsosaidthatthediameterofropeonthetop1/3oftheendlineconnectedtothebuoyislarger,andthereforestronger,thannecessary.Manylobstermenuse3/8”diameterropewhenthestrainonthisportionofthelinecouldactuallybehandledwith7/16”orevenassmallas5/16”.Thiswouldreducethestrengthoftheropenearthesurfacesystem.Oneofthechallengeslobstermenfaceiskeepingthesurfacesystemoftheirgearvisibleovertherangeofthetidalcycle.Avarietyofmethodsareemployedtoachievethisdependingonthestrengthofthetidesandbottomcurrents.Lobstermenmayuseoneormoretogglesseveralfathomsbelowthebuoy,orsmallerbuoysreferredtoastideormarkerbuoys,located5to15fathomsdistantfromthemainbuoy.Thesebuoyshelpmaintainthemainbuoyatthesurface,butprimarilyserveasawayforlobstermentogafftheirgearwithoutfightingthestrainonthelinefromtidesandcurrents.Inoffshorewaters,lobstermenusemoreflotationtokeepthesurfacesystemfromsubmerging,typicallyusingtwobulletbuoysorapolyball.Theseconfigurationsgenerallyrequiretheuseofasecond,smallermarkerbuoyattachedbylinetothemainbuoy.Lobstermenfishingoutside12nmarerequiredtomarktheendsoftheirtrawlswithhighflyers.Highflyersarelarge,metalmarkersthatrequiresignificantflotationtostayabovethesurface,suchasapolyballplusamarkerbuoy.Federalregulationsallowfortheuseoffloatinglineatthesurfaceifmorethanonebuoyis

BycatchConsortium–FinalReport#NA10NMF452034385

attachedtoasinglebuoylineorifahighflyerandabuoyareusedtogetheronasinglebuoyline.Lobstermensuggestedshorteningthelengthofendlinetominimizetheriskduetotheamountofropeinthewatercolumn.Lobstermentypicallyadd“scope”,oradditionallinelength,toabuoylineinordertoaccountfortidesandcurrents.However,thereisalotofvariabilityinhowmuchextraropeisfishedbasedondifferentdeterminationsamongfishermen.Itmaybepossibleformanylobstermentoshortenthelinestheyareusingandstillfishsafelyandeffectively.Lobstermenseemedtothinkthatshorteningthelineinthesurfacesystemcouldsignificantlyreducewhaleentanglementriskbecausemanybelieveitisdisproportionatelyinvolvedinentanglementsbecauseofskimfeedingbehaviorinrightwhales.However,inareaswithstrongtidesandcurrentsthatrequiremoreropetokeepthesurfacesystemvisible,thisalterationmaynotbeadvisable.SupportingevidenceItisknownthatwhalesgetentangledinthesurfacesystemoffishinggear,althoughtheriskofsurfacesystemgearmaybeoverestimatedbecauseitistheeasiesttoidentify(Johnsonetal2005).Thereisnoinformationonhowtheamountofgearatthesurfacemayimpacttheriskofgeartowhales.Nevertheless,ifthechangeissimpleandpossiblyevenreducesoperationalcostsbyusingropesoflesserdiameter,itisadvisabletoimplementwhereverpossiblegivennoconsequencetofishermenwhilepotentiallybenefittingwhales.MinimizetheuseofknotsandcoilsRationaleFederalregulationsencourage,butdonotrequire,lobstermentofishbuoylineswithoutknots(NMFS2002).Itishypothesizedthataknottedropemaygetstuckinthebaleenofawhale,whileaknotlessropewouldbemoreabletoslidethroughit,andthereforebelesspronetocausinganentanglement.Obstructionsonthelinecanalsobecreatedwhenalobstermancoilshisrope,creatingashankbelowthebuoy.Whatwouldthischangeinvolve?Lobstermenoftenusesplicesinsteadofusingknotswhenconfiguringgear,aprocedurethatiseasieronlandthanduringfishing.Theoperationalchallengesofsplicingwhilefishingoftenmakefishermenpreferusingknotsratherthansplices.Maintainingknotlesslinesbecomeschallengingoverthecourseofthefishingseasonbecausethecircumstancesrequiringlinestobejoinedtogetherincreasesinfrequency.Linesareoftencutbyotherlobstermenduetogearconflicts,andoverthecourseofthefishingseasonendlinesarecombinedforredeployinggearouttodeeper

waters.Muchofthisgearisshiftedduringthecoldermonthsoftheyear,inthedark,creatinganadditionalchallengingtosplicingrope.Creatingshanksisanalternativemethodtoshorteninggearwhenshiftingitfromdeeptoshallowerwater,insteadofreplacingtheentireendlinewithashorterropeorremovingalengthener.Lobstermenproposedalternativemethodsoftyingropestogetherinsteadofusingknots,suchasaneyesplicetuck,thatcouldbemanagedonaworkingvessel.Thismethodoftyinglinestogetherwouldminimizethebulgeontheline,andthereforetheobstructionifawhaleencounterstheline.Acommonconcernlobstermenhadaboutdecreasingtheuseofknotswasthebeliefthatknotsreducethestrengthofrope,increasingthelikelihoodthattheropewillbreakattheknotifencounteredbyawhale.Manylobstermenalsoidentifiedcoilingropeintoshanksaspotentiallyunsafeforwhales,becauseitmaycauseentanglementandcouldrendertheweaklinkineffective.Lobstermensuggesteddiscouragingtheuseofthismethodtoshortenandlengthenendlines.However,shanksrequirelessinvestmentinrope,andlessgearthatneedstobetransportedandhandledondeck.SupportingevidenceTherehavebeendiscussionsatAtlanticLargeWhaleTakeReductionTeammeetingstodeterminewhetherknotsshouldbeprohibitedinbuoylinesandfortheattachmentofthetogglegangiontothebuoyline(ALWTRT2003).Itwasdecidedthatitwasnotoperationallyfeasibletomakethisarequirement.However,thereisnoconclusiveevidencetosuggestthatknotsincreaseentanglementprobability.Thereisalsonoinformationastowhetherreducingtheamountofgearatthesurface,byeliminatingshanks,wouldreduceentanglementrisktowhales.ReducenumberoftrapsdeployedRationaleLessfishinggearshouldresultinalowerprobabilitythatwhaleswillencountergearandthereforebecomeentangledinit.Theassumptionisthattrapreductionwouldalsoresultinareductioninthenumberoffishinglines.Whatwouldthechangeinvolve?Toreducethetotalamountofgear,thenumberoftrapsdeployedwouldneedtoberestrictedbytraplimitsorbyreducingthenumberoflobstermenfishing.Manylobstermenbelievetheirincomeswoulddeclineiftheyfishedfewertrapsbecausetheyuseaportionoftheirtrapstoinvestigatelobstermigration.Lobstermenalsosaidthatiftheyhadtofishfewertraps,theymaydeploytheminsmallerstringsofsingles,pairs,ortriplestomaximizethecatchofeachtrap,leadingtomoreendlinesinthewater.Ofcourse,inmanyareasnewregulationswouldpreventthemfromreducingthenumberoftraps/trawl(NMFS,2005).Somelobstermensuggestedhavingseasonaltraplimitsduringperiodswheretheriskofinteractionswithwhalesishigh,whileallowingafullcomplementoftrapsduringtherestoftheyear.

BycatchConsortium–FinalReport#NA10NMF452034387

ThereareareasinMainethathaveimplementedreducedtraplimits,therebyminimizingtheamountofgearinthewater.InZoneB,SwansIslandlobstermenimplementedanislandconservationszonein1984andarelimitedto475traps,whichisa40%reductionperlobstermaninthatzone.In2000,ZoneElobstermenvotedtoimplementa600-traplimit,whichisa25%reduction.InZoneD,MonheganIslandlobstermenin1998establishedaconservationareaandhaveawinterfishingseason,andatrapreductionto300traps,laterincreasedto400trapsbasedonlobstermen’sclaimsthattheywerenotabletomakeadecentlivingunderthe300traprestriction.SupportingevidenceAssumingthatreducingthetotalamountofgeardeployedresultsinfewerendlinesinthewatercolumn,thereshouldbeareducedriskofentanglementtowhales(NMFS2013).DeploylinesundertensionRationaleIthasbeenhypothesizedduringAtlanticLargeWhaleTakeReductionTeammeetingsthatalinewithincreasedstiffnessorunderhightensionmayreducethenumberofentanglementsinverticallines,becauseoflowerentanglingproperties.Whatwouldthechangeinvolve?Linescomeunderhightensionwhenpolyballsareusedatoneendofthebuoylineandananchorattheother,especiallyinextremelystrongtidesandcurrents.ThispracticealreadyexistsineasternMaine(typicallyeastofSchoodicPoint),wherelobstermenfaceuniqueenvironmentalchallengesduetoextremelystrongbottomcurrentsandtides.Todealwithstrongtides,theydeploypolyballspairedwithatidebuoyforgrappling,tomarktheirgearatthesurface.PolyballsprovidemoreflotationthanStyrofoambulletoracornbuoysfishedelsewhere,aswellaspreventingthesurfacesystemfrombeingpulledunderwater.

Confoundingtheproblemofstrongtidesisthespeedofthebottomcurrents,whicharecapableofmovingunder-weightedlobstergeargreatdistancesalongthebottom.Inordertokeepthelobstertrawlswheretheyareset,lobstermendeployheavyDanforthanchors,mushroomanchors,railroadtiesorsimilarlyweighteddevicesattheendoftheirbuoylines.Theyalsosometimesweighdownindividuallobstertrapsfishedassingles,pairs,ortripleswithbricks,windowweights,cementorotherballast.

Otherlobstermenwhofishinareasofstrongtidesandcurrents,includingoffshorelobstermenindeepwaterareasandthosefishingaroundtheOuterCape,alsoreportdeployinggearinasimilarfashion.Todeploylinesundertension,lobstermenwouldhavetouseacombinationofalargeflotationdevice,anchors,andshortverticallines.Anotherpossibilityistouseropesofharderlay,butthesearemoredifficulttocoilondeckandarenotpopularinthisregion’strapfishery.LobstermenfromareasoutsideeasternMainedonotconsidertheuseofapolyballincombinationwithananchorasaviablefishingoption,anddonotbelievethatfishingthissortofgearwouldresultinthedesired“stiffening”ofthelineintheirlocalfishingareas.Thepolyballswouldprovidetoomuchflotationandcreateanexcessiveamountofdragonthegear.Anystrongwindorrunningtidewouldcausethegeartomovesignificantdistancesalongthebottom.Theuseofanchorsorextremeamountsofballastintrapstooffsetthistendencyisconsideredunnecessaryandextremelydangeroustothehauler,ondeckandwhensettingbackgear.Lobstermenalsosaidthatusinglargerfloatsandweightswouldnotcreatethelinetensiondesired,becausethattensioncomesfromthelargetidesandstrongcurrentsmorethanthecharacteristicsofthegear.Insteadofusinglargerfloatsandweights,lobstermenrecommendedmaximizinglinetensionbyshorteningthescopeofverticalline,coupledwithusingadequateballasttoholdtrapsonthebottom.Mostlobstermenreportedthatthiswasalreadythestandardconfigurationandthatthelinesinthewaterwerealreadyverytaut.Lobstermenalsocautionedthatwhenlinesareunderextremetension,lobstermenmustdeploymultipleflotationdevicesinthesurfacesysteminordertobeabletogaffthegearforhauling.Thisstrainonthelinealsoincreasesriskofinjuryifaropesnapsduetochafingorhang-downs.TheoverallconclusionbylobstermenwithregardtocreatinglinesunderextremetensionasseenineasternMaineisthatintheabsenceofstrongtides,anchoringgearisunlikelytoachievethesameleveloftensionontheline.SupportingevidenceTestsconductedbyBaldwinetal(2012)suggestthatahighertensionlinemaynotreducetheriskofinjurytowhales.Theyfoundthatlinesundertensionmaycauselacerationsthroughthesawingactionoftheropeagainstthepointofcontact.Theresultsoftheseexperimentsdidnotcompletelyeliminatethepotentialbenefitsofusingahighertensionlineorastiffline,butindicateahighriskofinjuryusingropediameterstypicallyusedinthisfisheryandathightension.Inaddition,ropesofharderlay,suchasthoseusedintheWesternAustralianrocklobsterfisheryareknowntoentanglewhales(How,Coughranetal.2015).

BycatchConsortium–FinalReport#NA10NMF452034389

ConclusionModifyingfishingpracticesisdifficultbecausemanylobsterfishermenreporttheircurrentmethodsarealreadyoptimizedtomaximizetargetcatch,areassimpleastheypreferthem,andaresafeforvesselandcrew.Lobstermendidhoweveridentifyarangeofapproachesforalteringfishingmethodsthatcouldserveasabasisforfutureresearchintopotentialgearmodificationstoreducetheriskofwhaleentanglementsinlobstergear.Table6brieflysummarizesthese,whichwerediscussedaboveinmoredetail.OneofthetechniqueshasbeenunderexaminationbytheBycatchConsortium(stiffrope),butgenerallytheseideasmaynotbetestableinthefield.TheBycatchConsortium’sVirtualWhaleEntanglementSimulator(VWES),acomputerprogramthatmodelsinteractionsbetweenrightwhalesandfishingropes,maybeausefulalternativetoolforevaluatingthesemitigationtechniquessuggestedbylobstermen.(See:http://www.bycatch.org/project/modeling-right-whale-entanglements).Table6.MethodssuggestedbylobstermeninthenortheastUStomitigatelobstergearentanglementrisktolargewhales.MitigationMethod

ScientificallyTested?

Regulated? Potentialtoreduceentanglementrisk

Maximizethenumberoftrapsperendlinetoreducethetotalnumberofverticallines

No

Yes.NewrulesfortheminimumnumberoftrapspertrawlwasimplementedbyNMFSundertheALWTRP(NMFS2015)

Fewerendlinesinthewatercolumnmayreduceentanglementprobability,althoughmanyotherfactorsareinvolved

Minimizethelengthoffloatinggroundlinebetweentrapstoreduceropeprofile

No,althoughshorteningthelengthofgroundlinereducestheprofileoftheline(StockwellandSummers2008)

No.Lobstermenarenotregulatedontheamountofropefishedbetweentraps.

Probablypreferablethanhavingthelinehigherinthewatercolumn,althoughentanglementpronerightandhumpbackwhalesdosometimesfeedattheseafloor

Minimizeriskfromsurfacegear

No

No Shorteningthelengthofline,ifpractical,soundslikeasensiblemeasurethatmayreduceentanglementrisk

Minimizetheuseofknotsandcoils

No

No,butreducingthenumberofknotsisencouragedbyNMFS

Assumptionisthatknotsincreasetheprobabilityofentanglementsinbaleen.However,knotsalsocreateapointalongthelinewithreducedbreakingstrengththatcanalsofacilitatewhalesbreakingfreeofgear

Reducethenumberoftraps

No No

Lessgearandropeinthewatershoulddecreasethelikelihoodofentanglementrisk.

Deploylinesundertension

ExaminedbytheBycatchConsortium(Baldwinetal2012),andinthisreport(Project1-EvaluationofWesternAustralianStiffRopeFishing)

No

Mightdecreaseentanglementriskbutcouldpotentiallyincreaseentanglementseverity(Baldwinetal2012).Evenifadvisable,itisnotclearhowfishingforlobsterusingropesofhighertensioncouldbereproducibleinareasoutsideonesthathaveconditionssimilartodowneastMaine.

Gearmodificationsmadeintheinterestsofreducingendangeredspeciesbycatcharemosteffectiveforfishermenandwildlifewhentheyresultthroughcollaborationsinvolvingstakeholders,especiallyfishermen.InthecaseofNorthAtlanticRightwhaleentanglements,theinputoffishermenisrarelysoughtoutsideoftheformalTakeReductionTeamprocess.Regularengagementandcooperativeresearchshouldbeusedtoincreasetransparencyandaccountabilityoftheresearchandregulatoryprocess.Duringourmeetings,lobstermenreportedthattheystillfeelalotofdistrusttowardsresearchersandmanagersbecauseofhistoricallybeingleftoutofresearchandmanagementdecisions.Thisisunfortunate,becausemanyofthemostpracticalandsustainablesolutionsemergeasideasproposedbyfishermenthemselves,makingtheirparticipationcriticalforbycatchreductionefforts(Werneretal,2006).Supportforcollaborativeresearch,includingwithsomeofthesesuggestionsproposedbylobstermen,remainsacriticalneedastheincidenceandseverityofrightwhaleentanglementsisnotdecreasingdespitemanyyearsofregulatedchangestolobsterandgillnetfishingpractices.

BycatchConsortium–FinalReport#NA10NMF452034391

ReferencesBaldwinK,ByrneJ,andBrickettB.2012.TautverticallineandNorthAtlanticrightwhaleinteraction:experimentalobservations.FinalReporttotheConsortiumforWildlifeBycatchReduction,underNOAAAward#NA09NMF4520413totheNewEnglandAquarium,Boston.[Accessiblefordownloadathttp://bycatch.org/sites/default/files/Baldwin%20et%20al%202012.pdf]BaumgartnerMF,MayoCA,andKenneyRD.2007.EnormousCarnivores,MicroscopicFood,andaRestaurantThat'sHardtoFind.TheUrbanWhale.S.D.KrausandR.M.Rolland.Cambridge,Massacusetts,HarvardUniversityPress:138-171.

HowJ,CoughranD,SmithJ,DoubleM,HarrisonJ,McMathJ,HebitonB,andDenhamA.2015.Effectivenessofmitigationmeasurestoreduceinteractionsbetweencommercialfishinggearandwhales.W.A.DepartmentofFisheries:120pp. HartleyTWandRobertsonRA.2006.Stakeholderengagement,cooperativefisheriesresearchanddemocraticscience:thecaseoftheNortheastConsortium.HumanEcologyReview13(2):161-171JohnsonAJ,SalvadorG,KenneyJF,RobbinsJ,KrausSA,LandryS.2005.Fishinggearinvolvedinentanglementsofrightandhumpbackwhales.MarineMammalScience21:635-645KnowltonAR,RobbinsJ,LandryS,McKennaHA,Kraus,SD,andWerner,TB.2015.Implicationsoffishingropestrengthontheseverityoflargewhaleentanglements.ConservationBiology(Acceptedmanuscriptonline:17JUL201503:24AMEST|DOI:10.1111/cobi.12590)KrausSD,BrownMW,CaswellH,ClarkCW,FujiwaraM,HamiltonPK,KenneyRD,KnowltonAR,LandryS,MayoCA,McLellanWA,MooreMJ,NowacekDP,PabstDA,ReadAJ,RollandRM.2005.NorthAtlanticrightwhalesincrisis.Science309:561-562MarshJL.2005.AnalysisofNorthAtlanticrightwhaleswimmingbehaviorduringbottomforagingeventstoassessentanglementrisk.MastersProject,NicholasSchooloftheEnvironmentandEarthSciences,DukeUniversity[Accessiblefordownloadat:http://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/10161/232/Maresh%20MP%202005.pdf?sequence=1]McCarronP,andTetreaultH.2012.LobsterPotGearConfigurationsintheGulfofMaine.MaineLobstermen'sAssociation,Kennebunk,ME.[Accessiblefordownloadathttp://www.bycatch.org/publications]

NationalMarineFisheriesService(NMFS).2002.Takingofmarinemammalsincidentaltocommercialfishingoperations;AtlanticLargeWhaleTakeReductionPlanRegulations,FinalRule.FederalRegister67(7):1300-1314[Accessiblefordownloadathttp://www.nero.noaa.gov/whaletrp/plan/11002gear.pdf]NationalMarineFisheriesService(NMFS)2005.SummaryofNMFSlowprofilegroundlineworkshop.September21-29,2005.[Accessiblefordownloadat:http://www.nero.noaa.gov/whaletrp/reports/2005LowProfileWorkshopSummary.pdf]NationalMarineFisheriesService(NMFS).2013.Takingofmarinemammalsincidentaltocommercialfishingoperations;AtlanticLargeWhaleTakeReductionPlanRegulations,ProposedRule.FederalRegister78(136):42654-42675[Accessiblefordownloadathttp://www.nero.noaa.gov/regs/2013/July/13alwtrpvlapr.pdf]NationalMarineFisheriesService(NMFS).2015.Takingofmarinemammalsincidentaltocommercialfishingoperations;AtlanticLargeWhaleTakeReductionPlanRegulations,FinalRule.FederalRegister80(102):30367-30379[Accessiblefordownloadathttp://www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov/protected/whaletrp/docs/2015-12869.pdf]PettisHM,andHamiltonPK.2015.NorthAtlanticRightWhaleConsortium2015annualreportcard.ReporttotheNorthAtlanticRightWhaleConsortium,November2015."(http://www.narwc.org/index.php?mc=9&p=29)StockwellTandSummersE.2008.Mainelow-profilegroundlineareaproposal:submittedtotheAtlanticLargeWhaleTakeReductionTeam.MaineDepartmentofMarineResources[Accessiblefordownloadathttp://www.maine.gov/dmr/rm/whale/lowprofileproposal2008.pdf]TuckerAD,McPheeDP,RobbinsJB.1997.AdoptingturtleexcluderdevicesinAustraliaandtheUnitedStates:whatarethedifferencesintechnologytransfer,promotion,andacceptance?CoastalManagement25:405-421WareC,WileyDN,FriedlaenderAS,WeinrichM,HazenEL,BocconcelliA,ParksSE,StimpertAK,ThompsonMA,andAbernathyK.2013.Bottomside-rollfeedingbyhumpbackwhales(Megapteranovaeangliae)inthesouthernGulfofMaine,U.S.A.MarineMammalScience.DOI:10.1111/mms.12053WaringGT,JosephsonE,Fairfield-WalshCP,Maze-FoleyK.2008.Northernrightwhale(Eubalaenaglacialis):WesternAtlanticstockinU.S.AtlanticandGulfofMexicoMarineMammalStockAssessments–2009.NationalMarineFisheriesService[Accessiblefordownloadathttp://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/nefsc/publications/tm/tm205/pdfs/7NorthRightW.pdf]

BycatchConsortium–FinalReport#NA10NMF452034393

WaringGT,JosephsonE,Maze-FoleyK,RoselPE.2010.NorthAtlanticrightwhale(Eubalaenaglacialis):WesternAtlanticstockinU.S.AtlanticandGulfofMexicoMarineMammalStockAssessments–2009.NationalMarineFisheriesService[Accessiblefordownloadathttp://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/publications/tm/tm213/pdfs/F2009NARW.pdf]WaringGT,JosephsonE,Maze-FoleyK,RoselPE.2013.NorthAtlanticrightwhale(Eubalaenaglacialis):WesternAtlanticstockinU.S.AtlanticandGulfofMexicoMarineMammalStockAssessments–2012Volume1.NationalMarineFisheriesService[Accessiblefordownloadathttp://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/pdf/ao2012.pdf]WernerT,KrausS,ReadA,andZollettE.2006.Fishingtechniquestoreducethebycatchofthreatenedmarineanimals.MarineTechnologySocietyJournal40(3):50-68.