project interim evaluation cocompeur

Leonardo da VinciPARTNERSHIPS

Welcome to the 4th COCOMPEUR project meeting in Espoo.

17.-20.01.2011

E-UMBRELLA


Topics

• Feedback to Kaunas meeting• Evaluation results• Current situation of the project

E-UMBRELLA


Feedback to Kaunas meetingaccording to questionnaire

• The poll was carried out in November 2010• Totally 12 responses • Conclusion – we had great time in Kaunas.

Thank you Kaunas team!• How it seems on pictures…

The start was rainy and foggy…

We waisted all our money to buy some sun….

We worked quite hard

…… visited companies

…..had lot of fun

E-UMBRELLA


And here it comes….

Our points to you dear Lithuanian friends

E-UMBRELLA


Structure, contest and handling of the event (average points)

ORGANIZATION-Evidence of clear planning – 3,73-Realistic deadlines (timescales)- 3,64CONTENTS-Contents appropriate and faithful to the objectives – 3,58-Variety of activities – 3,75

E-UMBRELLA


Structure, contest and handling of the event

• MANAGEMENT- Coordination of the project – 3,92- Management and follow-up – 4,00

E-UMBRELLA


Comments

• In general in terms of structure and the contents of the meeting everything went smoothly however I think that the deadlines need to be decided more clearly so that they will be respected !

• I think that everything was OK with planning and handling. All activities and meetings started and finished as planned. I liked to visit school and construction sites.

E-UMBRELLA


Quality of the transnational element

• CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE PARTNERS- Degree of contribution from each partner – 3,08- Partners sharing roles and responsibilities during

the event – 3,17• LINKS BETWEEN THE AIMS OF THE MEETING AND

THE AIMS OF THE PROJECT- Mutual understanding among partners about the

objectives of the project – 3,08- Synergy in the program of the meeting with the

project – 3,25

E-UMBRELLA


Comments

• It seems as though there was some confusion about the goals of the project and what all needs to be accomplished during the meetings. The partners do however share the responsibilities and all activities seem to have been divided up evenly and that each partner is willing to do their share of the work

E-UMBRELLA


Quality of partnership

TRANSNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP-Commitment of every partner – 3,17-Agreement among the partners – 3,42-Effective communication between the partners -3,42

E-UMBRELLA


Comments

• All of the partners work well together and get along without any problems. Sometimes there seems to be a little problem in communicating, not because of language differences but because of cultural and societal differences instead. All partners are very open to learning about the construction education systems in each of the partner countries.

E-UMBRELLA


Quality of the reception

QUALITY AND COMFORT- Attention brought to the practical aspects and catering – 3,58- Appropriate workplace – 3,75- Quality of accomodation – 3,92

E-UMBRELLA


Comments

• We felt very welcomed in Kaunas and the accomodations were very nice. The hotel was a good quality for the price and conveniently located. The hosting partners were very hospitable and put in a lot of effort to make the meeting successful

E-UMBRELLA


What were your expectations of this meeting

• We wanted to know more about possibilities to gain vocational education in the schools of Lithuania for young people and adults, how is organized practical training in schools and in companies, find out which subjects are taught in partner countries (in construction curricula).

• I wanted to know more about my professional subjects and organizing practical training at school and in companies.

E-UMBRELLA


Comments vol 2

• My expectation was comparison among more professional figures because the work in building sector is changing and itś important to know the caracteristics of more kind of jobs

E-UMBRELLA


Additional comments

• I think that we all need to try to be more efficient when working together during the meetings because otherwise it just creates more work for each partner to do their own time.

• The main conclusion is the fact that this partnership project provide possibilities for further collaboration in other different projects and programs.

E-UMBRELLA


Additional comments vol 2

• This meeting helped me to learn from my colleagues in Kaunas school and I would like to participate in other similar project

• It was pleasure to work together with colleagues that have such great experience in professional field and in project work.


COCOMPEUR project interim evaluation

November 2010

E-UMBRELLA


Project progress evaluation questionnaire

• The poll was carried out in November 2010• Totally 26 questions • 6 opened-questions• 21 responses• 8 questions got average points 4,45 and

higher

E-UMBRELLA


There are some achievements in project work I would like to highlight

I think that we have seen a lot of interesting construction sites which have given us a good understanding of the construction similarities and differences in each of the countries that we have visited. After seeing the differences in the types of schools and companies we decided to prepare some extra documentation in order to better explain the sector and give an overview for each country. Good knowledge about differences and

similarity in education and work among the countries

E-UMBRELLA


Achievements…. Direct collaboration with companies for

working out common demands to development professional education quality and our schools’ curricula; possibilities for future colloboration in next time different programs

development future activities between Cocompeur partners

Language skills are improved

E-UMBRELLA


Shortages to underline

• the involvement of all persons who are taking part of the meetings is not enough, probably due to bad English skills

• I think that we need to try to be more efficient during our meetings and try to cover more topics and complete more work in the time that we have.

• maybe we haven’t' plenty of time for partners meetings, especially for project finishing event in Kuressaare?

E-UMBRELLA


Problems to solve

• we should prepare the continuous project and involve other countries, as Baltic countries and Finland are quite similar, Italy much more different. We do not know about other countries where our students go to work placement and later to work.

• it possible that crises situation can bring any changes because situation in construction sphere isn’t typical for daily situation

• sufficient assessment of crisis risks

E-UMBRELLA


Comments

• There seems to be a little bit of confusion once in a while on the timelines and the project work that each partner needs to prepare on their own. The number of meetings seems to be enough but it is important that each partner prepares their work prior to the meeting so that we can be more efficient and make the most out of the time we have.

E-UMBRELLA


Comments 2

• It seems that the work is most effective during the get togethers and not meanwhile. We should put more effort on the work during the meetings.

E-UMBRELLA


I know the objectives of the project well enough

E-UMBRELLA


I understand my responsibilities in the project

E-UMBRELLA


The tasks between partners are equally distributed in the project

E-UMBRELLA


I know what is expected on behalf of my organization well enough

E-UMBRELLA


The communication between all project coordinators is efficient

E-UMBRELLA


I feel support from the management of my organization

E-UMBRELLA


All leaders of work groups are leading their tasks and groups well

E-UMBRELLA


Reporting issues (rules, timelines) are clear to me

E-UMBRELLA


I am aware of dissemination and valorisation responsibilities

E-UMBRELLA


Our organization has plan for dissemination and valorisation of the

project progress and outcomes

E-UMBRELLA


Comments 3

• I think that this partnership works very well together and that all partners are working hard and learning from one another. In my opinion the project is going smoothly and we will be very successful.

E-UMBRELLA


Conclusions

• Actually we are doing quite well….• Maybe we should try more to share the

responsibilities equally• We should work more effectively during

meetings• We should more clearly agree the the tasks

(homeworks) and timelines

E-UMBRELLA


Aitäh!!!!

project interim evaluation cocompeur

Documents

hosting partners

partner countries

variety of activities

construction education

contentscontents appropriate

vincipartnerships structure

appropriate workplace

terms of structure