project title: western regional soft white winter wheat

2
115 "--- PROJECT TITLE: Western Regional Soft White Winter Wheat Evaluation PROJECT LEADERS: Bob Stougaard and Todd Keener, NWARC, Kalispell, MT Phil Bruckner/Rhoda Burrows, Plant and Soil Science, Bozeman, MT. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate soft white winter wheats for adaptability, yield, quality, and disease resistance. RESULTS: Yields were drastically reduced in many varieties of the Soft White Winter Wheat nursery due to a combination of winter injury and snow mold. Most severe in the Oregon entries, the winter kill complex in some cases thinned stands by 90%. Apparently however, regrowth combined with spring and summer tillering enabled some varieties to produce a fair yield in spite of considerable stand reduction. Besides the Oregon entries suffering from the winter kill, there were also large plot losses in the varieties of Nugaines, Moro, Elgin and Kharkof. The high yield was 138.9 bu/A (WA 7756) while the mean for the nursery was 92 bul A. Eighteen varieties had yields in excess of 100 bul A. Test weights were less than normal due mainly to environmental conditions throughout the growing season. The mean test weight was 49.07 lb/bu and the high was 54.55 lb/bu ( OR 851139). TCK smut ( dwarf bunt) was observed in the nursery at low levels with only seven varieties having greater than 1% infection. There were twelve varieties that had no TCK infection. FUTURE PLANS: Continued evaluation of new and introduced lines is planned in the future through cooperative state-wide testing.

Upload: others

Post on 29-Nov-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

115

"--- PROJECT TITLE: Western Regional Soft White Winter Wheat Evaluation

PROJECT LEADERS: Bob Stougaard and Todd Keener, NWARC, Kalispell, MTPhil Bruckner/Rhoda Burrows, Plant and Soil Science,Bozeman, MT.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate soft white winter wheats for adaptability, yield, quality, anddisease resistance.

RESULTS: Yields were drastically reduced in many varieties of the Soft White Winter Wheatnursery due to a combination of winter injury and snow mold. Most severe in the Oregonentries, the winter kill complex in some cases thinned stands by 90%. Apparently however,regrowth combined with spring and summer tillering enabled some varieties to produce a fairyield in spite of considerable stand reduction. Besides the Oregon entries suffering from thewinter kill, there were also large plot losses in the varieties of Nugaines, Moro, Elgin andKharkof. The high yield was 138.9 bu/A (WA 7756) while the mean for the nursery was 92bul A. Eighteen varieties had yields in excess of 100 bul A. Test weights were less than normaldue mainly to environmental conditions throughout the growing season. The mean test weightwas 49.07 lb/bu and the high was 54.55 lb/bu ( OR 851139). TCK smut ( dwarf bunt) wasobserved in the nursery at low levels with only seven varieties having greater than 1% infection.There were twelve varieties that had no TCK infection.

FUTURE PLANS: Continued evaluation of new and introduced lines is planned in the futurethrough cooperative state-wide testing.

.:»

116

Table 1. Agronomic data from the Western Regional Soft White Winter Wheat Nursery grown onthe Northwestern Agricultural Research Center. Kalispell. MT in 1993.Planted: September 21. 1992 Harvested: August 30. 1993

CI NUMBER VARIETY YIELD TESTWT HEADING HEIGHT WINTER 11 % 21BU/A LB/BU DATE INCHES KILL % TCK

LODGE 31INDEX

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CI 1442CI 11755CI 13740CI 13968CI 17596CI 17917OR 855WA 7662WA 7686WA 7753WA 7690OR850933OR851048OR860303.LD085153WA 7729WA 7730WA 7717\'lA7695WA 7E97Tr'IH 1004j;Xrl 1005?3185;..rIi1OR851139OR856537OR855350ORFW0333viA 7622w: 7752WA Ti54WA 7755WA 7756XWH 1008OR870012OR870337OR8708310R880525ORFWHS02ORFWB004ORFWHS04F383WW56PB83WW59

KharkofElginMoroNugainesStephensTresPahaIISel.72-330/DLuke/Daws/IHill 81VH02254/0RCW8313.Tyree/Roazon/Tres.VPM/MS951/YMH/HillYMH/HYS/4/MRS/3/YMStephens/QuilarnapuAFG2/BUC. F1/KvrSprague/StephensWA6814/Tres. VA087VH090077WA7690 SibDawsIISU92/3*Omar-SPNIISU92/3*Ornar-2X WH1004 HybritechX WH1005 HybritechDawsl C~ITT/PNW BYMH/HYS/3/EG/17838niS/YAHAIIWA4095/3Pendleton Sel. OR8Pendleton Sel.Tyee/Roason/Trest

TresllMadsen/Tres.Pullman Sel. VD090Pullman Sel. VH091Pullman Sel. VH091XWH1008 Hybritechh~S703/3/55-1744/7KVZ/3/HD/ONIIBB/41AFG2/BUC,F1/KVZOR946I HILL1HILLT. TIMOPHEEVI/2*P1STEPHENS*2/SM-4FW841061GREERPlant Breeders 1 SPlant Breeders 1 S

OVERALL MEAN =LSD (05 by t)=

55.8562.7964.9639.7993.4578.5273.0474.71109.374.0498.0063.49102.236.83122.464.5964.05110.259.1561.90135.7125.8113.9129.923.1474.7684.9397.74113.282.70131.8138.9113.092.57111.3105.1118.882.21101.2110.7135.4130.5

51.5049.0047.3047.8548.8847.8047.7744.8050.1545.7849.9048.4048.9751.5350.0045.7045.0350.1744.1348.3853.2052.7051.9254.5541.3047.2245.2847.2251.5045.9251.1053.5048.7748.0050.4553.2852.7846.1549.4851. 8050.5851.25

91.96 49.0717.57 1.742

158.5 49.21164.0. 44.78162.3 ';:,41.83161.0' 31.00159.0 34.45164.3 37.89162.8 32.97162.8 30.51160.5 34.94165.3 34.94160.5 36.91157.5 31.99159.5 35.43154.8 31.99159.3 38.39163.8 33.46164.8 32.97162.8 41.34163.0 31.00162.8 31.50159.5 37.89160.0 39.37159.0 36.42161.0 41.34163.3 35.43161.3 34.94165.3 33.46164.5 37.40162.8 38.88163.5 38.88159.5 39.37160.8 40.85158.8 35.43162.0 34.45159.0 32.48154.3 34.94162.5 41.34163.0 43.80164.0 36.42158.8 34.94158.8 38.39162.0 40.85

94.7582.5093.2597.2557.5083.7591.5093.2552.5071.7564.7585.7566.0098.0043.7594.7588.7523.7575.5090.504.5003.25040.0032.5099.5086.2555.254.2502.5003.5002.0003.2507.50038.506.5005.0001.5004.00010.507.7502.7504.750

161.2 36.78 47.021.984 1.976 20.07

.25

.12

.00

.12

.62

.12

.00

.25

.25

.00

.25

.12

.125.50

.12

.00

.00

.12

.00

.00

.37

.37

.25

.12

.00

.00

.12

.00

.12

.00

.871.001. 25

.121.256.00

.75

.004.75

.37

.62

.00

67.75.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.13.0

42.7.13.0.0.8

.628 2.7772.533 7.268

11 Winter Kill % = that percent of plot reduced by snow mold and winter injury21 % TCK = percent of plot ( ocular observation ) infected with Dwarf Bunt31 Lodging Index determined by lodging prevalence X severity divided by 9.

-:»

.:»