projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 main and lateral canal

28
Imperial Irrigation District Metropolita~ Water District of So~thern California Water Conservation Agreement Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal Concrete Lining Verification Summary Report Conserva!ion Verification Cot sul!ants April 20, 1996

Upload: others

Post on 24-Mar-2022

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

Imperial Irrigation District

Metropolita~ Water District ofSo~thern California

Water Conservation Agreement

Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7Main and Lateral Canal

Concrete LiningVerification Summary Report

Conserva!ion Verification Cot sul!ants

April 20, 1996

Page 2: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

Imperial Irrigation District

Metropolitan Water District ofSouthern California

Water Conservation Agreement

Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7Main and Lateral Canal

Concrete LiningVerification Summary Report

Conservation Verification Consultants

April 20, 1996

Page 3: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

Conservation Verification Consultants

April 20, 1996

Water Conservation Measurement Committee Members

Mr. Gerald DavissonPalo Verde Irrigation District180 West 14th AvenueBlythe, California 92225

Mr. Kirk DimmittMetropolitan Water District107 South 5th Street, Suit,200El C.entro, California 92243

Mr. Robert KriegerKdeger and Stewart3602 University Avenue, Suite 201Riverside, California 92501

Mr. Jesse SilvaImperial Irrigalion DistrictP.O. Box 937Imperial, California 92251

Mr. Joseph SummersWCMC ChairmanSummers EngineeringP.O. Box 1122Hartford, California 93232

Dear Sirs,

Transmitted herewith is lhe Cottservation Vedfication Consultants’ Vedfication Summary Report forProjects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7: Main and Lateral Canal Lining.

Conservation Vedfication Consultants

~:. Davi~E

~sephq. Bur~s, ENG, PE

ec: Mr. Mike Kingl]]3/Project Management

Page 4: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ....................................................... 1

CONSERVATION VERIFICATION PROCEDURES ................................ 2

MAIN CANAL WATER CONSERVATION ESTIMATES ............................ 3

LATERAL CANAL WATER CONSERVATION ESTIMATES ......................... 4

TABLE 1. Water Conservation Estimate for Concrete Lining of Main Canals ................ 6

APPENDIXES

A

B

C

PONDING TEST INDEX

VERIFICATION DOCUMENTATION INDICES

TABLES OF ESTIMATED CONSERVATION SAVINGS FOR ALL PROJECT 7 LATERALCANAL REACHES BASED ON LATERAL PROBE RUNS

CVC (KB)elng_3vsr.cvc

Proj~ts 2,5,10,11,&16, and 7April 20, 1996 (Supers~xies 2/20/96)

Page 5: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

PROJECT 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7MAIN AND LATERAL CANAL

CONCRETE LININGVERIFICATION SUMMARY REPORT

INTRODUCTION

Concrete lining of selected secdons of main and lateral canals were included in the December 1988Imperial Irrigation District (IID)/Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) WaterConservation Agreement. The Main Canal Lining Projects are:

¯ Project 2 -- South Alamo Canal Phase I;

¯ Project 5 -- South Alamo Canal Phase II;

¯ Project 10 -- Vail Supply Canal;

¯ Project 11 -- Rositas Supply Canal; and

Project 16 -- Westside Main Canal.

Project 7 is the Lateral Canal Lining Project. Its objective was to line sections of laterals throughout IID’sservice area wherever the cost per anticipated acre-foot (AF) of conservation savings would be sufficientlylow, ie. a total life cycle cost of $125/AF per year or less in 1988 dollars.

IID began the main canal lining activities in 1989 and completed all of ~he Main Canal Lining Projects in1992. They began lining laterals in February of 1990 without using a screening strategy to select reacheswhere the annualized cost was no greater than the targeted value of $125/AF of conserved water. IID’sWater Resource Unit analyzed 110 miles of lateral canals lined as of September 30, 1991 and found thatthe estimated savings and the respective annualized cost per AF did not meet the desired goal for Project 7.In view of this, they estimated the potential savings from lining the remaining unlined lateral reaches andrecommended how to proceed with the program (see the draft report Project 7." Lateral Canal LiningProject Plan dated November 1991, filed as Annex A).

As a follow-up to the Water Resource Unit study, project management contracted with an outsideconsultant to further review Project 7. That effort resulted in the preparation of the report Critique of the

¯Conservation Program’s Lateral Canal Lining Verification Plans and Procedures dated February 12, 1992,which is filed as Annex B. In this critique it is suggested that: a more rigorous seepage analysis procedurebe used; more careful procedures be used for the ponding tests; and that in addition to considering steadystate seepage and evaporation loss savings, comideration also be given to start-up and shutdown losses.(Start-up and Shutdown losses were not considered in the earlier analysis of conservation savings.) Thefinal recommendation was to develop revised conservation estimates and screening procedures in view ofthe above.

cvcclng_3vsr.cvc 1

Projects 2,5,10,11,&16, and 7April 20, 1996 (Supersedes 2/20/96)

Page 6: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

After reviewing the above reports, the Program Coordinating Committee asked the consultant to develop anew set of procedures for screening all remaining unlined lateral canal reaches and estimating the potentialconservation savings that would result from lining them. The result of this effort was the development ofthe report Computer Program for Estimating Losses from Unlined and Lined Lateral and Main CanalReaches dated June 30, 1992, which is filed as Annex C. The original computer program Lateral Probethat was developed as part of the report was used to screen all remaining unlined lateral reaches to locatethose where the annualized cost of conserved water was less than $125/AF.

CONSERVATION VERIFICATION PROCEDURES

The basic procedure for estimating the conservation savings from canal lining is to first estimate the pre-project quantity of water that is being lost to seepage, evaporation, and canal operations from an unlinedreach of canal. Then estimate what these losses would be with the canal lined and subtract this with-project loss from the pre-project loss.

For verification purposes the seepage losses were determined from falling head ponding tests. For the maincanals the tests were conducted on selected reaches that were being considered as candidates for lining. Inthe case of lateral canals, seepage tests were conducted in typical (half-mile long) reaches of canalstraversing soils that represented the full spectrum of soil types and permeabilities. These seepage testswere then used to develop a seepage inference model. Appendix A is a listing of the seepage tests wereperformed.

Computerized Verification Program

The seepage inference model in the original version of Lateral Probe was upgraded using supplementarydata from the additional series of more detailed seepage tests covering a wider range of soil classifications.To prepare the conservation estimates, the CVC relied on the updated version of Lateral Probe that isincluded in the report Project 7 - Lateral Canal Screening and Verification Model dated October 31, 1993,which is filed as Annex D. In general, lateral canal losses can be considered to fall into the categories ofstart-up seepage, steady-state seepage, evaporation, flow management, and post-shutdown losses. LateralProbe contains a physically based seepage inference model that can be used to estimate seepage as well asthe other losses1.

Because steady-state seepage is the most significant of these losses, most of the effort associated withproducing Lateral Probe centered on developing a seepage inference model giving a seepage rate that isconverted to a steady-state seepage rate using an estimate of the effective hydraulic conductivity. The

The seepage inference model used by Lateral Probe is based on a calibration of theErnst equation to lateral and main canal ponding tests conducted by IID under theAgreement. The Ernst equation is a combination method that considers both regionsof curvilinear (radial) flow and Dupuit-Forchheimer (horizontal) flow. Parameters the Ernst equation include: the geometry of the canal, the depth to the groundwatertable, the depth to an impermeable boundary, and the horizontal extent of canalseepage.

cvc (K~)elng_3vsr.evc

Projects 2,5,10,11,&16, and 7April 20, 1996 (Supersedes 2/20/96)

Page 7: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

ponding test data were used to calibrate the model and develop a regression equation for estimating theeffective hydraulic conductivity.

This approach gives an accurate estimate of the steady-state seepage rate in large canals (top width greaterthan 20 feet) and a less accurate but satisfactory estimate of the steady-state seepage rate in small canals.The coefficient of correlation (R2) between the predicted and measured steady-state seepage for theponding tests is 0.75, which demonstrates that Lateral Probe is sufficiently accurate to be used forverification purposes. (Only the seepage inference model portion of Lateral Probe was used in making theconservation estimates for main canals.)

MAIN CANAL WATER CONSERVATION ESTIMATES

The installation of concrete lining in main canals will reduce the volume of water presently lost to seepage.Also the concrete lined sections will generally have narrower water surface top widths than unlinedsections. Consequently the water lost to evaporation from canal water surfaces and transpiration by canalbank vegetation will also be less in concrete lined sections. Thus water conservation resulting fromconcrete lining of main canals comes from reduced seepage and, when the canal’s top width is narrowerafter lining, reduced evaporation. Since main canals are operating nearly 100% of the time, startup andshutdown losses are insignificant and, therefore, not considered in the conservation estimates.

Seepage Loss Estimates

IID conducted pre-lining ponding tests in four of the ten main canal reaches lined or scheduled to be linedunder the Agreement. With the exception of the Westside Main Canal, the seepage measured by thesetests corresponds well with that predicted by the seepage inference model used by Lateral Probe. In thecase of the Westside Main Canal, the measured seepage rate is much less than that predicted by the model.The Westside Main Canal reaches are in sandy soils where the expected seepage rate is high; however,there is an apparent clogging layer that effectively restricts seepage.

The measured pre-lining seepage rate was used for those canal reaches with ponding tests. For theremaining reaches, the pre-lining seepage rate was estimated by Lateral Probe or from the average ofnearby ponding tests. These seepage rates were applied for 100% of the time since main canals are notdrained when shutdown.

A constant unit seepage rate of 0.0360 ft3/ftZ/day was assumed for the post-lining. This value was derivedfrom the average of ponding tests conducted by IID in lined canal reaches. The post-lining seepage lossfor a canal reach was computed by multiplying the average wetted perimeter of the reach by the length ofthe reach limes this unit seepage rate.

CVC (KB)ehag_3vsr.cvc 3

Projects 2,5,10,11,&16, and 7April 20, 1996 (Supersedes 2/20/96)

Page 8: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

Evaporation Loss Estimates

A net annual evaporation rate2 of 5.86 feet was assumed for estimating the evaporation loss from the freewater surface of the canals. The annual evaporation loss for a canal reach was reduced by lining becauselined reaches generally have narrower top widths. The pre- and post-lining evaporation losses werecomputed by multiplying the corresponding average widths of the reach times the length of the reach timesthe assumed evaporative demand of 5.86 ft/year.

Projected Conservation Savings

The water conservation for concrete lining of main canals was computed as the difference between the pre-lining and post-lining seepage and evaporation loss estimates. Table 1 summarizes the estimated waterconservation for all main canal lining completed or planned under the Agreement. The ProjectedConservation Savings for the entire set of Main Canal Lining projects (Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, and 16) 1,810 AF per year.

LATERAL CANAL WATER CONSERVATION ESTIMATES

Lining lateral canals also reduces seepage and evaporation losses. In addition it reduces the start-up andshutdown losses that are associated with lateral operation. Starting and stopping flows is a necessary partof operations because water deliveries to the farm turnouts along lateral canals are not continuous.Furthermore, since any given reach of a lateral is only carrying water part of the time, the opportunitytime for seepage and evaporation losses to occur is reduced proportionately.

Lateral canal loss categories include start-up seepage, steady-state seepage, evaporation, flowmanagement, and post-shutdown losses. The first three of these losses are passive losses in that little canbe done from the standpoint of lateral operation to prevent them from occurring. The latter two are activelosses in that they are closely tied to the way in which the lateral is operated. Lateral Probe includesprocedures for estimating all of these losses except for those associated with flow management.

Lateral Probe uses the delivery data in the liD CFS file 3, to summarize the amount and frequency of thecarriage and delivery flows in each lateral. To estimate the losses due to evaporation, seepage, andtransitory losses (during operation of the checks and during start-up or shutdown of the lateral), additionaldata must be compiled and entered into the program. These data include: lateral grades and cross-sectionstaken from IID’s E-drawings; water table elevations from liD’s observation well logs and tile drain maps; .soil texture and permeability from USDA Soil Conservation Service’s Soil Survey oflmperial CountyCalifornia Imperial Valley Area; evaporation pan information, and IID’s engineering data for the reachesproposed for lining. (This information is listed in the Verificafon Documentation Indices, see Appendix and included in the Main and Lateral Canal Lining archives.)

Based on an average annual pan evaporation of 105 inches at the weather station at IIDheadquarters and utilizing a pan coefficient of 0.67.

The IID CFS file is a subset of the water delivery records stored in IID’s AS400 computerdatabase.

cvc (I~)clng_3vsr.cvc

Projects 2,5,10,11,&16, and 7April 20, 1996 (Supersedes 2/20/96)

Page 9: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

For each lateral canal reach, Lateral Probe was used to compute estimates the losses twice: once as if thereach were unlined; and a second time as if it were lined. The difference between these two estimatesrepresents the estimated amount of water that is conserved by lining.

Projected Conservation Savings

Appendix C contains a table showing the output from Lateral Probe for all of the lateral canal reaches thatwere lined and included in Project 7. A total of 199.7 miles of lateral canal were lined by December 31,1995. The estimated average net conservation is 121.41 AF per mile per year based on net values (start-up, shutdown, seepage and evaporation) obtained from the screening runs made with Lateral Probe usingaverage operating conditions from May 1986 through April 1992. The Projected Conservation Savings forProject 7 - Lateral Canal Lining is 24,250 AF per year.

cvc (KB)clng_3vsr.cvc 5

Projects 2,5,10,11,&16, and 7April 20, 1996 (Supersedes 2/20/96)

Page 10: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

Table 1. Water Conservation Estimate for Concrete Lining of Main Canals.

Main Canal Projects

ProjectPre-Lining Post-Lining Conservation

Year Length Seepage Basis* Evaporation Seepage Evaporation Estimate

Lined (miles) (AFY) (AFY) (AFY) (AFY) (AFY)

Project 2 - South Alamo Canal Phase I:Delivery 31 to Alamo River Spill & Lateral 5A

Project 5 - South Alamo Canal Phase II:Heading to Del 9/9ADelivery 9/9A to Del. 15A/16Delivery 15A/16 to Del. 31

Project 10 - Vail Supply Canal:Alamo River to Del. 173A (existing lining)

Project 11 - Rositas Supply Canal:Station 7301 (existing lining) to Palmetto Del.

Project 16 - Westside Main CanalTdf. Lat. 10 to Station 218155 (existing lining)Trif. Lat. 12 to Del. 93Delivery 93 to Del. 99Tdf. Lat. 6 to Trif. Lat. 10

1989 2.55 582 LP 55 98 21 510

1990 1.01 493 Test 25 56 121990 0.89 303 Avg 14 48 101990 1.30 245 Test 35 68 15 9OO

1990 0.49 15 LP 13 11 5 10

1991 1.52 174 Test 42 68 15 130

1992 1.34 151 Test 36 98 361991 2.10 118 Avg 39 54 211990 2.10 174 Avg 47 84 31--- 167 Avg 57 148 57

260

*Basis for pre-lining seepage estimate: Test = result of ponding test; Avg = average of nearby ponding test; and LP - Lateral Probe seepage inferencemodel.

cvc (K~)clng_3vsr.cve 6

Project 2,5,10,I 1,&16, and 7April 20, 1996 (Supersedes 2/20/96)

Page 11: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

APPENDIX A

PONDING TEST INDEX

Page 12: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

Ponding Test Binder Index7/18/95

Lateral Ponding Data

Status Report Concrete Lining Verification Ponding Tests

1990 Lateral Ponding Data

Dahlia Lat., 52-53, February 1990Pear Lat. 1, 44-42A, May 1990Acacia Canal, Lat. 6-gate 45, July/August 1990Hemlock Lat. 1, August 1990Forgetmenot Canal, 17-19, August 1990Ash Lat. 3, headgate-gate 15, August 1990Date Lateral 10, 81-81A, September 1990Rockwood Canal, 133-134, September 1990Fillaree Canal, 27-28, September 1990Daffodil Canal, 11-12A, September 1990Pear Main Canal, 69-70, October 1990F Lateral, 18-20, October 1990Alder Canal, 24-26, November 1990Newside Lateral 3, 31-32, November 1990Vail Lateral 3A, 363-365, December 1990Vail Lateral 6, 606-608, December 1990Thistle Main Canal, 36-38, December 1990Ash Main Canal, headgate-Lat. 2, December 1990

1991 Lateral Ponding Data

Spruce Main Canal, headgate-37, January 1991Moss Canal, 6-7, January 1991FLat., 8-10, April 1991Dogwood Lateral 2, 17-18, April 1991Flax Canal, 24-end, April 1991Wisteria Lat. 6, 79-Lat. 6A, May 1991Roselle Canal, 6-end, June 1991Dogwood Canal, 41-44, July 1991K Lat., 12-13, July 1991Township Lat., 25-26, August 1991Rockwood Canal, 138A- 146, August 1991Acacia Canal, 46-46A, August 1991

Page 13: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

Ponding Test Binder Index7/18/95

1992 Lateral Ponding Data

Vail Lat. 4, 413-415, July 1992Acacia Lat., headgate-end, July 1992Oxalis Lat., 1-2, July 1992Elm Lat. 3, 10-10A, September 1992Alder Lat., 67-70, December 1992

1993 Lateral Ponding Data

Occident Lat., 7-8, February 1993Elder Lat. 6, Headgate-I8, April 1993Woodbine Canal, 36-45, April 1993Rose Lat. 6, Dogwood Rd.-end, May 1993Rose Canal, 19-22, October 1993

1994 Lateral Ponding Data

Rose Canal, 8-18, February 1994

Lateral Post Project Data

IID Water Resources Unit - September 29, 1994 and July 12, 1995Post Project Seepage Tests Note

Pear Lat. 1, February 1991Date Lat. 10, headgate-81, February 1991South Alamo, 8-9, June 1991Best Canal, 10-13, July 1994Elm Canal, 38-39, July 1994Hemlock Lateral 2B, 55-58, August 1994

Main Canal Ponding Data

South Alamo Canal, Highway 98-3 I, November 1990Rositas Supply Canal, adjacent to Palmetto 20-20A, November 1990Rositas Supply Canal, existing lining-station 8760, November 1990Rositas Supply Canal, Ash Inlet-Sperber Reservoir, January 1991Vail Supply Canal, Drop 34-Nectarine A heading, December 1990Westside Main Canal, 90-91, December 1990Westside Main Canal, Trifolium Lat. 10-11, February 1991Westside Main Canal, Trifolium Lat. 5-6, December 1991Westside Main Canal, Spruce weir-65, December 1991

Page 14: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

Ponding Test Binder Index7/18/95

Main Canal Ponding Data Continued

Westside Main Canal, Trifolium Lat. 8-9, February 1991East Highline Canal, Narcissus-Nutmeg Lats., December 1991

Continuous Seepage Test Data

Rockwood Lat. 5, 138-139, April 91Rockwood Lat. 5, 138-139, June 1991Rockwood Lat 5, 138-139, August 1991Ash Lat. 39, 168-169, January 1991Ash Lat. 39,Ash Lat. 39,Ash Lat. 39,Ash Lat. 39,Ash Lat. 39,Ash Lat. 39,Date Lat. 9,Date Lat. 9,Date Lat. 9,Date Lat. 9,Date Lat. 9,Date Lat. 9,

168-169, March 1991168-169, May 1991168-169, July 1991168-169, November 1991168-169, February 1992168-169, July 199283-85, February 199183-85, April 199183-85, July 199183-85, August 199183-85, November 199183-85, February 1992

Page 15: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

APPENDIX B

VERIFICATION DOCUMENTATION INDICES

Page 16: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

ARCHIVED DOCUMENTS FOR MAIN AND LATERAL CONCRETECANAL LINING PROJECTS 2, 5, 10, 16, and 7

GENERAL REPORTS REFERRED TO IN VERIFICATION SUMMARY REPORT

Annex A: Project 7: Lateral Canal Lining Project Plan - DraftliD, Water Resources Unit, November 1991

Annex B: Critique of the Conservation Program’s Lateral Canal Lining Verification Plans andProcedures, Keller-Bliesner, February 12, 1992

Annex C: Computer Program for Estimating Losses from Unlined & Lined Lateral & MainCanal Reache~, Keller-Bliesner, June 30, 1992

Annex D: Lateral Canal Lining Screening and Verifi~ation Model - Project 7 - Final ReportKeller-Bliesner Engineering, October 31, 1993

ALL ARCHIVED GENERAL REPORTS AND MEMORANDUMS

1990, 8. Verification Plan Concrete Canal Lining Projects(Project 2/5 South Alamo Canal Lining, Project 7 Lateral canal Lining, Project 10 Vail Supply CanalLining, Project 11 Rositas Supply Canal Lining, Project 16 Westside Main Canal Lining)Bookman-Edmonston Engineering, Inc., August 1990

1990, 12. Water Conservation Report 1990 South Alamo Canal Lining Phase I. Pro_iect No. 2Bookman-Edmonston Engineering, Inc., December 1990

1991, 8. Water Conservation Agreement Water Conservation Verification PlanBookman-Edmonston Engineering, Inc., August 1991

1991, 11. Pro_ieet 7: L~teral Canal Lining Pro_iect Plan - DraftIID, Water Resources Unit, November 1991

1991, 11. Canal Concrete Lining Projects Water Conservation Verification ImplementationPlan - Draft, liD, Water Resources Unit, November 1991

1992, 2. Critique of the Conservation Program’s Lateral Canal Lining Verification Plans andProcedures, Keller-Bliesner, February 12, 1992

1992, 6. Computer Program for Estimating Losses from Unlined & Lined Lateral & Main CanalReaches, Keller-Bliesner, June 30, 1992

1992, 8. Water Conservation Estimate for Concrete lining of the Westside Main Canal - InterimReport, CH2M Hill and Keller-Bliesner, August 6, 1992

Page 17: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

1992, 10 Ponding Test Procedures Manual - Final DocumentIID Water Resources Unit, October 1992

1993, 1. Sensitivity Testing of Seepage Inference Model - Draf~Keller-BIiesner Engineering, January 25, 1993

1993, 8. Lateral Canal Lining Screening and Verification Model - Project 7 - Final ReportKeller-Bliesner Engineering, October 31, 1993

1993, 8. References cited in: Lateral Canal Lining S~reening and VerifiCation Model - Project 7 FinalReport, Keller-Bliesner Engineering, October 31, 1993

1994, 3. Main Canal Sections (Memorandum)liD Water Resources Unit - March 22, 1994

1994, 5. Main Canal Lining Water Conservation EstimateCVC, (Revised) May 3, 1994 & April 24, 1994

1994, 7. Review of Lateral Probe Runs on All Potential Concrete Lining Sites (Memorandum)liD Water Resources Unit, July 28, 1994

1994, 10. Concrete Lining Water conservation Information Table, Through December 1994(Spreadsheet), lid Water Resources Unit - October 7, 1994

1995, 3. Westside Main Seepage Studies Conducted Feb. 15-18, 1995 (Memorandum)IID Water Resources Unit, March 6, 1995

1995, 3. Pro_iected 1995 Water Conservation Savings with Summaries of Supporting Documentation,CVC, March 1995

PONDING TEST REPORTS AND MEMORANDUMS

1990, 7. Ponding Test Study Results. DraftIID Water Resources Unit, July 1990

1990, 8. Concrete Lining Water Conservation Verification Draft Status Report. Draftlid Water Resources Unit, August 9, 1990

1990, 12. Water Conservation Report 1990 South Alamo Canal Lining Pha~¢ I, Project NO. 2(includes South Alamo Canal Ponding Study and Ponding Study Calculations)Bookrnan-Edmonston Engineering, Inc., December 1990

1992, 10. Ponding Test Procedures Manual Final DocumentIID Water Resources Unit, October 1992

2

Page 18: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

1993, 4. Soil and Water Investigations at Previous Ponding Test Sites (Memorandum)IID Water Resources Unit, April 1, 1993

1993, 11. Rose Canal Seepage Study (Memorandum)liD Water Resources Unit - November 3, 1993

1994, 2. Rose Canal Seepage Study (Memorandum)liD Water Resources Unit, February 28, 1994

I994, 7. Best Canal Post-Project Seepage Test Results (Memorandum)lid Water Resources Unit, July 29, 1994

1994, 8. Elm Canal Post-Project Seepage Test Results (Memorandum)IID Water Resources Unit, August 5, 1994

1994, 8. Hemlock Lateral 2B Seepage Test Results (Post-Project) (Memorandum)liD Water Resources Unit, August 30, 1994

1994, 9. Post Project Seepage Tests (Memo to File)lid Water Resources Unit, September 29, 1994 and updated July 12, 1995

1995, 7. Canal & Lateral Concrete Lining Verification Ponding Test Summary (Current ThroughJuly 1995), lid Water Resources Unit, Compiled July 11, 1995

1995, 7. Main Canal Seepage Study and Ponding Test Summary (Current Through December 1993 ),lid Water Resources Unit, Compiled July 1995

~ELD DATA

1996, 2. liD Concrete Lining Lateral and Main Canals(mileage per work approvals and section length in miles)liD, 1994

1995, 7. Canal and Laterals Drawing Number IndexIID, September 30, 1992

1995, 7. General Well Data - 1974 through July 1976liD, Compiled 1992

1995, 7. liD Ponding Test Databound data: lateral ponding, lateral post project, main canal ponding, and continuous ponding;liD Water Resources Unit, 1990 through 1995

1995, 7. Soil Survey of Imperial County California Imperial Valley AreaUSDA Soil Conservation Service - October 1981

Page 19: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

1995, 7. Lateral Probe Model Runs for Concrete Lining Verification - Volume 1 A through G,Volume 2 H through R, and Volume 3 S through Z canals and laterals,lid Water Resources Unit, 1992, 1993, and 1994

Page 20: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

APPENDIX C

TABLES OF ESTIMATED CONSERVATION SAVINGSFOR ALL PROJECT 7 LATERAL CANAL REACHES

BASED ON LATERAL PROBE RUNS

Page 21: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

CONCRETE LINING WATER CONSERVATION INFORMATION TABLE, THROUGH DECEMBER 1994

CANAL LOCATION

ACACIA CANAL 1HDG-DEL 4ACACIA CANAL DEL 044ACACIA CANAL DEL 0~12ACACIA CANAL DEL 12-18 (tAT 2)ACACIA CANAL DEL 18 (tAT 2)-19ACACIA CANAL DEL 18-.20AACACIA CANAL DEL 20A-22AACACIA CANAL DEL 22A-24ACACIA CANAL DEL 24-26 (I.AT 3)ACACIA CANAL DEL ~2 (53)~5ACACIA CANAL DEL ~TAACACIA CANAL DEL 87A~8ACACIA LAT 02 HDQ-DEL 17 (END)ACACIA LAT 03 HDG-DEL 25 (END)ACACIA LAT 05A DEL 51A~1C/51D (END)ACACIA LAT 09 1HDG (OEL 75)-76ACACIA LAT 09 DEL 7~-79ACACIA LAT 09 DEL 7~80ACACIA tAT 09 DELACACIA LAT 09 DEL 81~3ACACIA LAT O9 DEL 8~84ACACIA LAT 10 DEL 95-96ACACIA tAT 10 DEL ~97ACACIA tAT 11 1HDG (US DEL 93A/~B)-~93BACACIA tAT 11 DEL 63A/~94/94AACACIA tAT 12 HDG-DEL ~A (END)ALAMITOS CANAL DEL 5(~50AALAMITOS CANAL DEL 50A~2ALAMITOS CANAL DEL 52-52AALAMITOS CANAL DEL 52A-53AtAMITOS CANAL DEL 5~54ALAMITO~ CANAL DEL 5~80ALAMITOS tAT 4 1HDG-OELALAMITOS tAT 4 DEL 17-18ALAMITOS tAT 4 DEL I~SPILL (END)AtAMITOS tAT 4 DEL 19C~17ALAMITOS tAT 4A H0~-ENDALDER CANAL IHOG-DEL 2AALDER CANAL DEL 02A~3ALDER CANAL DEL 0~7ALDER CANAL DEL 24-29ALDER CANAL DEL 2~27AALDER CANAL DEL 27A-30

LATERAL LATERALPROBE PROBE EARTHEARTH LINED REACH TOP

SEEPAGE SEEPAGELENGTHWIDTHAF/YR AF/YR FEET FEET INIHR

ON%

27.70 2.57 2.074 34.0 1.80 96.013.82 3.36 2.716 29.6 0.81 95.918.75 5.01 4,175 27.4 0.60 95.94.56 1.17 947 25.5 0.54 95.9

42.52 2.94 2.751 27.1 1.71 95.852.08 1.61 1,360 26.1 2.40 95.85.08 1.54 1.301 32.7 0.5~ 95.83.76 2.56 2,608 32.2 0.31 95.85.98 3.63 2,713 30.4 0.32 95.7

125.3~ 2.42 2.153 21.3 4.~d) 95.05~.33 1.94 1.775 19.6 2.(~ 94.852.77 1.81 1.486 18.8 3.40 93.433.65 1.22 5.356 11.3 0.20 37.035.49 1.03 4.039 12.3 0.20 27.873.67 0.40 2,775 10.0 2.00 28.630.36 0.79 1,865 11.9 1,00 55.48.57 0.66 2,665 18,0 0,20 43.4

13.98 0.32 1,2~8 13,5 1,40 38.038.77 0,30 1,767 14.0 6.00 33.114.58 0.18 1,010 16.8 4.07 30.42.67 0.18 1,569 13.9 0.20 22.86.95 0.32 912 14.0 0.~0 47.19.72 0.49 1,714 14.1 0.43 34.7

29.20 0.43 1,324 12.1 0.80 51.177.45 0.34 1,288 13.5 3.87 38.421.39 0.35 2.630 15.5 0.91 21.88.03 0.44 1.309 11.8 0.37 45.2

11.47 1.04 3,999 14,4 0.20 42.62.71 0.19 1,278 13.0 0.49 22.43.50 0.15 1,342 9.0 0.60 17.43.39 0.22 2,874 8.5 0.38 12.2

17.12 1.14 2.~2~ 15.4 0.~0 53.625.19 0.62 2.753 11.6 0.~0 38.82.58 0.O9 1,339 9,9 0.50 7.60.00 0.98 I)69 7.0 0.e0 0.07.10 0.15 1,257 10.7 0.57 15.43.16 0.07 1,156 10.8 0.~0 6.47.42 3.58 3,076 32.7 0.80 ~5.0

48.56 3.33 2,~63 32.4 1,64 95,013,5~ 3.18 2,527 28.7 0.55 95.010.73 2.67 2,615 29.3 0.34 94.96.98 3.55 3,485 27.0 0.23 94,9

89.27 2.48 2.434 22.4 3.42 94.9

(S:~VICKIE~CL~94CLWQ1, REVISED 10/7/94)

LATERAL LATERAL LATERALPROBE PROBE PROBE

NET NET NET SHUTEVAP START UP DOWN CORREC-

SAVINGS SAVINGS SAVINGS TIONAF/YR AF/YR AF/YR FACTOR

5.78 0.62 1.45 1.055.g~ 0.21 -1.07 17.79 0.69 1.41 1.051.56 0.17 -O.13 1.055.88 0.07 -0.19 1.052.50 0.14 0.37 1.0~3.56 0.01 0.46 1.OF,7.67 0.68 -0.62 1.056.01 0.28 -1.38 1.0~3.02 1.19 -2.27 1.052.16 1.76 -2.05 1.041.65 0.30 -0.28 0.992.23 38.73 15.57 1.383.54 12.13 22.45 1.321.23 34.54 7.78 0.911.81 24.24 -4.48 1.122.53 13.00 5.45 1.410.72 9.42 2.~2 0.991.03 13.~5 2.47 0.840.97 10.15 5.97 0.850.82 4.74 4.13 1.280.87 4.O9 4.38 1.201.51 4.83 23.59 1.200.89 15.16 3.66 1.210.96 23.52 8.54 0.872.37 1.56 40.0~ 0.970.56 3.83 1,12 1.292.39 12.17 7.02 1.400.50 1.71 1.76 1.080.19 3.49 0.43 1.000.35 0,13 "0.~3 1.032.55 8.87 0.80 1.221.52 20.58 8.19 1.150.28 0.92 4.57 0.~20.00 O.00 0.00 0.790.3~ 0.71 2.32 0.980.29 8.28 3.29 0,668.36 0,13 0.75 1.058.78 0.22 0.64 1.055.17 0.13 -5.07 1.056.51 0.~9 0.24 1.057.60 0.50 -1.94 1.053.79 0.74 -5.14 1.05

ADJUSTEDEARTH

SEEPAGEAF/YR

29.~14.4919.664.78

44.5854.615.333.946.27

131.4557.2752.~

66.81

12.0713.63

12.453.418.31

11.6835.4267.6829.7410.3916.112.933.803.48

2.370.~7.022.767.78

14.2511.257.32

90.61

ADJUSTEDLINED

SEEPAGEAF/YR

9.2512.1018.044.21

10.585.805.333.946.278.716.965.804.393.711.442.84

1.151.O90.650.651.151.761.551.221.261.583.740.680.540.794.102.230.320.030.540.257.78

11.9911.459.617.328.93

ESTIMATEDANNUALWATER

CONSERVEDAF/YR

27.647.50

11.512.17

39.7651

4.037.114.90

124.6852.1848.19

81.25108.~2

30.8725.7447.17

12.4516.27

63.7914.30

6.227.072.54

27.0657.127.820.009.87

14.389.24

40.573.039.066.16

84.07

Page 22: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

CONCRETE LINING WATER CONSERVATION INFORMATION TABLE, THROUGH DECEMBER 1994 (S:~VICKIE~CL~4CLWQ1, REVISED 10/7p~4)

LATERAL LATERALPROBE PROBE EARTHEARTH LINED REACH TOP

SEEPAGESEEPAGELENGTH WIDTH ~ ONCANAL LOCATION AF/YR AF/YR FEET FEET IN/HR %

ALDER CANAL DEL 38/39(REMOVED)-45/48 (MC CABE 124.31 2.45 2,722 22.4 2.00 94.0ALDER CANAL DEL 83-84 19.24 0.63 1,312 16.5 4.20 94,0ALDER CANAL DEL 94-64A 43,89 0.64 1,272 15.9 8.00 83.7ALDER CANAL DEL 64A-86(INTERSTATE 8) 81.26 0,67 1,342 19.0 4,65 83.2ALDER LAT 02 DEL 12-DS DEL 11 (END) 4.48 0.41 5,173 12.8 0.20 50,4ALDER LAT 07 DEL ~)-~4A 42.30 0.63 1,763 11.5 4,20 64.7ALDER LAT 07 DEL ~IA-70 101.00 11.10 3,160 10.3 1.78 78.5ALDER LAT 07 DEL 70-HWY 80 (EVAN HEWES) 51.53 0.71 3,189 9,9 1.18 48.7ALDER LAT 10 HDQ-DEL 58 (END) 8.27 0,12 1,304 9.3 0.20 10.0ASH CANAL 1HD~-HDQ LAT 2 (DS DEL 8) 396.96 12.55 5.264 40.7 8.00 96.3ASH CANAL DEL 63,A-~ (DS HWY 115/EVAN HEWES) 77.16 2.34 4,551 12.7 0,20 93.5ASH LATERAL 03 1HDQ (DEL 17)-DEL ~2.45 0.45 2.756 10.4 3.24 27.5ASH LATERAL 03 OEL 15-1~/16C 31.52 0.24 1.386 13.4 2.B5 23.2ASH LATERAL 18 + HOQoOEL 77 (END) 32.07 0.57 3.2~ 11,0 0,eO 35,9ASH LATERAL 33 DEL 150/152-150A/152A 6.56 0.24 1.231 18.3 2.00 3~,8ASH LATERAL 39 (HDG) DEL 1~0-168 (END) 21.63 0.33 2,817 12.2 0.20 17.5B LATERAL OEL 34 (USOEL 35,SPRR)-35 4,89 0.45 511 22.5 0.52 96,4B LATERAL DEL ~ 7,64 0,76 1,323 15,2 0.20 55.7B LATERAL DEL 38..40 12.85 0.76 1,321 15.3 0,~0 53,8B LATERAL DEL 40-41 11.03 1.10 2,325 12.8 0.20 48.0B LATERAL DEL 41-42 11.39 0,71 1,312 18.0 0,53 48.5BEST CANAL 1HIX~-DEL 4~ 67,78 1.17 1,290 17,7 6.00 94.8BEST CANAL DEL 100-102 (HWY 78) 48.68 1.47 2,890 16,5 4.65 93.6BEST CANAL DEL 110-113 11.61 0.71 1,228 16,1 0.20 ~2,1BEST CANAL DEL 11~-114 12.94 0.77 1,318 18.6 0.57 92.0BEST CANAL DEL 114,-120 25.79 1.70 8,670 15.6 0.20 91.6BEST LAT 1 HDQ (OEL 11~)-DEL 116A/llBB (ENO) 26,~0 2.14 1.891 17,0 0.20 89.9C L.’~TERAL DEL 21-23 6.01 0.89 2,750 17.2 0.29 49.1C LATERAL DEL 23-25 3.55 0.68 2,611 13,5 0,30 43.0C LATERAL DEL 25-29 8.30 1.11 5,298 16.1 0.20 35.4DAHLIA CANAL DEL 33A-3(~ (PIPE) 1.75 0.32 ~05 24.9 0.20 92.7DAHLIA LAT 8 HO~-DEL 68 (RELOCATED) ~2.94 1.35 2.640 14.4 0.50 94.5DANDEUON CANAL DEL 2.,3 11.13 0.25 1.326 13.3 2.97 35,5DANDELION CANAL DEL ~ 16.21 0.28 1.335 15.0 2.49 32.0DANDELION CANAL DEL 3B-4 14,17 0.~5 4,541 15,0 0,45 20.8DATE LATERAL 07 HD~-END 5.95 0.26 2.549 10.8 0.20 16.2DATE LATERALOB + DEL92-63 3.24 1.27 5.20~ 10.8 1,91 52.6DATE LATERAL 10 DEL 7~-79 26.63 0.26 1.891 9.1 2.13 25.3DATE LATERAL 10 DEL ~ (END) 7.68 0.23 2,642 8.0 0.20 14.8DATE LATERAL 10 DEL 81A-78 48,37 0,44 2,210 9.5 3.42 34.4DATE LATERAL 10 HD~.DEL 81A 3.03 0.29 1,324 9.9 0,20 38,4DATE LATERAL 11 1HD~-DEL 68A 56.67 0.65 2,653 12.9 2.03 44.9DATE LATERAL 11 D~L ~8A-70 (END) 21,55 0.25 1.2~ 13.0 1.44 31.4

LATERAL LATERAL LATERALPROBE PROBE PROBE

NET NET NET SHUTEVAP START UP DOWN CORREC~

SAVINGS SAVINGS SAVINGS TIONAF/YR AF/YR AF/YR FACTOR

4.96 13.22 -1.38 1.051.66 0.41 0.49 0.951.59 1.68 0.26 0.902.1 5 6.53 0.25 0.931.63 6.40 22.52 1.431.01 4.84 1.08 0,911,90 111.90 -3,10 1.071.29 ~).36 0.88 1.0~0,48 18.99 4.71 1.10

11.38 8.17 1.31 1,053,77 12.20 -3.68 1.520.98 3.23 4.95 0.8~1.09 4.18 15.55 0.8~1.96 20.68 -0.72 1.141.01 2.74 2.73 0.941.59 33.76 12.94 1.220.92 0.03 0.68 1.050.65 11.31 0.28 1.450.79 8.30 1.59 1.220.54 20.35 1.08 1.431.67 14.54 9.88 1.221.39 6.53 -0.54 0.924.36 0.57 0.80 0.951,63 1.93 0,11 1,522.19 0.18 0,33 1.355.28 31.01 16.79 1.521.45 5.12 -3.92 1.522.46 1.63 6.76 1.351.73 0.20 2.87 1.333.65 9.10 24.11 1.371.45 0.28 0.07 1.058.63 4.gO 0.34 1.350.75 4.5~ 2.4~ 0.681,41 1.g6 68.38 0.903,47 3.80 70.90 10.92 8.93 4.92 1.201.97 33.95 4.68 1.020.51 7.54 6.13 0.890,75 3.74 2.48 1.180,91 7.87 1.22 0,870,41 4.37 1.1 1 1.391.73 57.g~ 7.22 0.9~1.10 5.34 15.55 0.96

ADJUSTEDEARTH

SEEPAGEAF/YR

130.3518.2039.5157.096.43

3~.70106.9554.736.89

418.27117.67

27.1035.456.15

4.9210,9415.7215.7313.8962.19

17.6817.48

8.184.72

11,411.84

9.9014.5315.277.153.31

23.679.29

42.324.20

ADJUSTEDLINED

SEEPAGEAF/YR

8.822.272.502.411.482.27

2.580.43

45.188,42

0.682.050.951.191.~22.742.743.962.564.215.292.552.776.127.703.202.454.001.154.680.901.012.340.943.310.640.531.581.042.340.90

ESTIMATEDANNUALWATER

CONSERVEDAF/YR

138.3518.4940.9463.7135.5043.3~

178.791 23.7030.64

391.95121,6161.4047.0~

11.7773.434.90

20.4523.6733.7407.73

18.8017,41

16.027.07

44,472.48

93.7016.7773.2991.10

37.0"215.4150,749.34

119,0541.72

Page 23: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

CONCRETE LINING WATER CONSERVATION INFORMATION TABLE. THROUGH DECEMBER 1994

CANAL LOCATION

LATERAL LATERALPROBE PROBE EARTHEARTH LINED REACH TOP

SEEPAGE SEEPAGELENGTHWIDTHAF/YR AF/YR FEET FEET

DOGWOOD CANAL DEL 51-53 (HWY 50, EVAN HBNES) 4.71 1.02DOGWOOD LAT02 DEL 1(~14 26.78 1.15DOGWOOD LAT 02 DEL 13A-15 16.36 0.59DOGWOOD LAT 02 DEL 14-13A 10.56 0.56DOGWOOD LAT 02 DEL 15-17 8.15 0.43OOGWOOD LAT 02 DEL 17-18 15.51 0.54DOGWOOD LAT 10 DEL 80~1/~1A 56.31 0.36DOGWOOD I.AT 10 DEL 64A-84B 0.80 0.04DOGWOOD tAT 10 DEL 84B-85A (END) 0.15 0.05E LATERAL DEL 7-8 43.33 0.56E LATERAL DEL 8-10 61.82 1.01EHL LATERAL 5 1HDG-DEL 171 9.84 0.06EHL LATERAL 5 DEL 164-1~ 19.~4 0.46EHL LATERAL 5 DEL 168-1(~ 1.86 0.14EHL LATERAL 5 DEL 16~170 (END) 9.79 0.15EHL LATERAL 5 DEL 171-164 47.39 0.29EHL SIDEMAIN #1 + HDG-DEL 122 5.18 1.45ELDER CANAL 1HDQ-DEL 3/4 0NAHL RD) 31.08 9.03ELDER CANAL + US DEL 25/FORR RD-DEL 26 182.13 5.26ELDER LATERAL 2 DEL ~29 49.15 0.26ELDER LATERAL 3 DEL 35rJsAF3~-37 (END) 9.35 o.o~ELDER LATERAL 6 HDQ-DEL 54 (END) 11.95 0.21ELM CANAL DEL Oe (HWY BO, EVAN HEWES)-3~ (SPRR) 6.44 1.01ELM CANAL DEL 38-3~ 74.77 1.10ELM CANAL DEL 39-49 222.73 4.85ELM CANAL DEL 49-49A/49B 44.90 1.40ELM LATERAL 3 1HDG-DEL 1OR 25.80 0.~0ELM LATERAL 3 DEL 2~26 26.40 0.16EUCALYFrUS CANAL 1H[X~STA 32+00 70.47 9.37EUCALYPTUS CANAL DEL 01A 0NAHL RD)~ 151.13 13.56EUCALYPTUS CANAL DEL 081/82~3/V~5/85A 282.69 4.41EUCALYPTUS CANAL DEL 10e-110 51.72 3.64EUCALYPTUS CANAL DEL 144-145 35.46 0.69EUCALYPTUS CANAL OEL 145-147 16.~6 0.64EUCALYPTUS CANAL DEL 147-148/149 36.97 1.26EUCALYPTUS CANAL DEL 150 (D~ 1/4MI)-151 21.32 0.79EUCALYPTUS CANAL DEL 153/154-155 86.46 0.40EUCALYPTUS LAT 02 DEL 21-END 9.10 0.14EUCALYPTUS LAT 10 + DEL 102-101 5.10 0.22EUCALYPTUS LAT 14 H[X3-DEL 114/Vl15 17.83 1.38EUCALYPTUS LAT 18 + HDG-OEL 126 (END) 11.11 0.32F LATERAL 1HDQ-DEL ~ 106.75 3.19F LATERAL DEL 24-31A ~0.34 2.95

IN/HRON%

1,506 22.2 0.20 95.32,610 12.6 0,55 77.91,341 12.7 0.68 87.91,294 11.8 0.20 70.81,228 15.0 0.20 66.21,267 15.8 1.44 82.91,315 11.6 3.40 40.5

378 10.4 0.40 14.11,408 18.4 0.20 7.61,336 14.5 8.00 86.12,606 19.6 5.50 83.4

310 16.0 6.00 36.12,849 16.3 ~-41 22.31,139 12.7 0.20 16.71,308 10.1 0.50 11.51,487 14.3 4.86 27.91,131 34.0 8.00 91.63,343 35.3 0.97 97.01,814 15.2 4.14 86.83,790 12.8 2.80 6.01,503 10.0 0.52 7.42,315 8.2 1.30 13.11,192 18.5 0.20 90.02,592 14.5 4.49 70.87,994 12.6 1.77 88.92,626 13.0 0.20 61.31,395 12.5 1.22 56,82,699 13.6 4.50 8.66,059 35.1 1.61 95.25,561 35.0 2.95 95.23,839 22.9 4.91 93.13,710 18.8 1.32 95.01,34~ 1 5.9 4.04 70.91,324 15.4 0.50 86.83,017 15.3 1.36 61.82,434 16.8 1.42 50.53,822 12.0 4.32 15.31,218 13.1 Z(~ 15.72,~ 10.3 0.20 13.2B,051 12.7 0.28 33.32,¢Z0 12.5 0.33 16.17,420 20.3 5.00 90.77,765 13.4 0.20 73.0

(S:~VlCKIL~CL\94CLWOl, REVISED 10/7/94)

LATERAL LATERAL LATERALPROBE PROBE PROBE

NET NET NET SHUTEVAP START UP OOWN CORREC-

SAVINGS SAVINGS SAVINGS TIONAF/YR AF/YR AF/YR FACTOR

2.93 0.35 0.26 1.352.38 1.72 0.07 1.320.90 6.99 -2.27 1.250.74 1.01 1.17 1.491.18 11.05 0.65 1.481.36 8.54 3.18 1.070.72 12.99 1.04 0.900.12 1.02 0.95 1.030.0~ 0.68 0.70 11.78 1.03 0.0~ 0.914.65 2.00 0.47 0.910.23 4.27 0.76 0.841.43 7.~0 9.25 0.870.31 16.26 1.73 1.210.38 10.41 2.46 0.940.80 26.83 7.47 0.643.73 1.64 0.49 18.73 1.15 1.57 1.052.27 5.86 -4.14 0.971.42 42.29 10.76 0.810.33 12.45 2.11 0.910.64 12.29 .0.24 0.881.14 6.06 -O.41 1.522.35 2.84 0.88 0.925.47 25.27 -0.90 11.90 5.26 -1.57 1.471.20 19.40 2.30 1.0~0,63 13.91 16.29 0.81

16.10 2.73 6.95 1.0522.50 4.13 5.56 1.055.88 4.46 0.90 I4.15 3.61 -1.18 1.171.32 7.32 1.0~ 0.931.42 6.82 4.04 1.262.73 14.13 4.42 1.062.45 13.64 7.50 1.032.04 8.29 31.00 0.820.45 2.79 5.23 0.640.75 0.71 4.65 1.162.82 17.82 6.18 1.291.42 30,86 4.37 1.(]D

11.52 1.01 1.70 16.95 39.19 2.75 1.49

ADJUSTEDEARTH

SEEPAGEAF/YR

4.9435.4520.4215.729.09

18.6450.810.830.16

39.3156.458.26

17.062.259.21

5.43

176.17

8.4710.4612.8368.57

234.71

21.2673.89

156.47296.42

35.7521.30

7.655.~0

12.1B174.8595.07

ADJUSTEDLINED

SEEPAGEAF/YR

3.674.142.122.091.551.941.300.140.162.023.640.291.660.500.541.045.22

32.5116.941.010.320.763.643.96

16.745.042.160.58

33.7348.8915.8813.822.462.304.542.641.440.500.794.971.15

11.4810.62

ESTIMATEDANNUALWATER

CONSERVEDAF/YR

4.8135.4823.9216.5520.4527.7664.272.771.47

40.1156.9313.26

21.9376.846.07

11.53161.0593.1623.04

14.9970.86

247.8166.4148.7451.52

141.79291.79

31.27

42.8194.4115.6111.4244.7947.48

177.06126.34

Page 24: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

CONCRE3rE LINING WATER CONSERVATION INFORMATION TABLE, THROUGH DECEMBER 1994

CANAL LOCATION

FERN SlDEMAIN HDG-OEL 12/12A (END)FIG LAT 4 DEL 2~29 (END)FILIJ~REE CANAL 1H[X~DEL 5/6/7FILLAREE CANAL DEL 7-10AFILLAREE LAT 1A 1HDQ-DEL 3CFILLAREE LAT 1A DEL 3C-ENDFLAX CANAL DEL 24-ENDFORQETMENOT LAT + HDG-DEL 3 (END)Q lATERAL DEL 12-24QUNTERMAN CANAL 1HIX~DEL 88/67 (PREVIOUS ENO)QUNTERMAN CANAL DEL 87-63 (EN0,PREVIOUS GUN LAT 1)H LATERAL DEL 14-16H LATERAL DEL 24-28H LATERAL DEL 2~SPRR (USDEL 28)HEMLOCK LAT 1 HOQ-DEL 3HEMLOCK LAT 2B DELHEMLOCK LAT 2B DELHEMLOCK LAT 2B DELHEMLOCK LAT 2B DELHEMLOCK LAT 2B DEL 87~8 (END, NO DEL 89)J LATERAL 1HDQ-DEL 4J LATERAL DEL 12-14J LATERAL DEL 14-22K LATERAL DEL 16-17K LATERAL DEL 17-18K LATERAL DEL 18-20K LATERAL OEL 20-21K LATERAL DEL 21-22K LATERAL OEL 22-23 (SPRR)L LATERAL + DEL 24-28MAGNOLIA LATERAL DEL 10-13MAGNOLIA LATERAL DEL 4-6MAGNOLIA LATERAL DEL 7-10MALVA LATERAL 2 + DEL 1-3MALVA LATERAL 2 + HDG-OEL 1MAPLE LATERAL DEL 10-20MAYFLOWER LATERAL 1HOG-DEL 4MAYFLOWER LATERAL DEL 0~-9MAYFLOWER LATERAL DEL 15-16 (HWY 115)MOSS LATERAL 1HDO-DEL 3MOSS LATERAL DEL 4-5MOSS LATERAL X-OVER(DSDEL 7)-OEL 11/12MULLEN LATERAL DEL ~A-12

LATERAL LATERALPROBE PROBE EARTHEARTH LINED REACH TOP

SEEPAGE SEEPAGELENGTHWIOTHAF/YR AF/YR FEET FEET IN/HR

ON%

86.20 0.44 2,394 9.8 4.00 39.127.06 0.38 850 11.3 6.00 9.758.24 8.36 6,768 15.5 0.82 94.3

216.75 9.86 8.519 25.1 4.33 93.354.95 1.00 2,378 18.5 2,00 64.1

140.68 0.76 3.227 13.2 6.00 37.61.32 0.12 955 16.1 0.20 10.44.01 0.09 1,2~0 7.0 0.75 5.7

88.78 6.18 15,993 14.9 0.20 96.317.10 0.16 1,405 10.9 1.18 28.813.69 0.08 1,0~7 10.4 2.00 5.47.99 1.01 2,750 12.3 0.30 77.1

17.43 0.79 2.613 12.8 0.20 58.712.34 0.57 2.057 14.0 0.45 53.512.49 0.11 2,~ 9.1 1.70 6.030.93 1.41 3,074 31.9 1.40 51.932.79 1.07 3,383 17.5 1.69 34.77.47 0.20 1,294 15.4 2.50 18.15.21 0.11 852 18.0 1.86 15.43.32 0.17 1,396 15.6 0.20 10.5

76.17 3.94 5,480 15.4 5.00 81.325.33 1.82 2,667 12.0 0.60 66.341.34 4.96 10,678 20.0 0.10 62.4

1.57 0.34 1.329 23.0 0.15 54.71.44 0.32 1.328 21.5 0.06 52.7

10.71 0.61 2,651 19.0 0.16 48.79.13 0.27 1,301 20.0 0.69 42.90.84 0.24 1.341 21.O 0.0~ 35.61.20 0.20 2.00~ 20.7 0.17 22.3

57.0~ 1.21 2.880 13.8 2.74 59.36.66 2.12 2,722 18.1 0.20 93.88.30 2.38 2.644 23.3 0.~0 96.16.61 2.01 2,595 18.9 2.58 95.1

42.79 3.41 3,951 21.0 0.20 90.23~.99 0.75 992 18.0 3.10 91.020.93 2.01 7.534 14.9 0.09 50.995.09 2.34 4,227 19.0 2.43 87.129.91 1.21 2,844 18.8 0.20 78.555.57 0.76 2,488 13.0 2,00 53.7

197.74 1.42 3,000 25.8 6.00 98.123.48 1.31 2,638 22.3 1.36 97.224.2~ 2.75 5,130 18.7 0.20 96.5

128.42 2.19 5,168 14.5 1.72 65.5

(S:\VICKIE~CL~g4CLWQ1, REVISED 10/7/94)

LATERAL LATERAL LATERALPROBE PROBE PROBE

NET NET NET SHUTEVAP START UP DOWN CORREC~

SAVINGS SAVINGS SAVINGS TIONAF/YR AF/YR AF/YR FACTOR

1.03 30.27 -1.34 0.870.28 6.28 3.74 0.80

13.45 2.39 -5.12 1.2814.54 1.15 -21.18 1.054.2~ 20.54 17.45 1.023.0~ 13.02 31.35 0.840.55 2.25 14.14 1.110.52 14.44 8.57 0.86

22.65 1.79 0.89 1.530.58 17.42 4.79 0.970.24 10.83 1.50 0.812.32 0.01 1.09 1.441.93 6.47 3.30 1.461.43 2.84 0.93 1.290.~0 1.21 -0.86 0.828.83 45.83 28.75 1.054.00 78.~3 13.53 0.050.58 20.32 8.17 0.850.44 18.89 2.07 0.8~1.02 14.57 18.02 1.118.81 1.12 1.02 O.gO1.65 6.44 1.08 1.27

13.0;2 8.82 8.25 12.00 0.30 3.13 1.051.80 2.55 3.39 1.052.82 4.~5 1.34 1.471.48 1.55 7.23 1.051.54 5.55 6.45 1.050.97 4.21 0.28 1.051.78 6.70 -0.51 0.964.54 1.02 003 1.535.94 0.03 1.44 1.054.~0 0.4~ -0.11 1.005.47 5.23 -1.93 1.051.29 0.g~ 0.13 1.006.48 20.30 4.39 1.5~5.70 14.64 1.11 1.003.34 3.64 1.16 1.501.~0 32.68 1.14 0.997.49 0.24 0.30 1.0~0.14 0.01 0.10 1.05g.17 0.03 0.89 1.533.92 22.~2 2.14 1.05

ADJUSTEDEARTH

SEEPAGEAF/YR

75.2321.7274.49

227.2855.8~

118.741.483.43

135.6716.6511.1311.4925.4515.8710.2432.1231.136.374.483.68

32.18

1.751.51

15.709.570.881.28

10.168.706.89

44.8737.07

207.3524.6237.09

134.48

ADJUSTEDLINED

SEEPAGEAF/YR

1.580.29

30.1055.503.602.740.430.32

22.250.580.293.642.842.050.405.063.850.720.400.61

14.186.55

17.861.221.152.200.970.860.724.357.638.506.89

12.282.707.248.424.352.745.114.72

7.88

ESTIMATEDANNUALWATER

CONSERVEDAF/YR

103.6031.7155.11

196.2994.51

163.4417.9728.64

138.9538.8623.4111.27

19.0211.00

110.45123.4434.7025.49

63.43

54.185.968.10

22.3119.1913.548.00

58.198.127.824.95

41.3935.7756.59

111.5548.7388.57

210.2628.1537.28

155.56

Page 25: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

CONCRETE LINING WATER CONSERVATION INFORMATION TABLE, THROUGH DECEMBER 1994 (S:~VICKIE~CL~94CLWQ1, REVISED 10/7/94)

CANAL LOCATION

MUNYON LATERAL DEL 24 (HWY 115)-29 (END)MYRTLE LATERAL 1HDG-DEL 3MYRTLE LATERAL DEL 23.28 (END)NEWSIDE LAT 3 HDG-DEL 338 (HWY 88)O LATERAL DEL 8-14 (BLAIR RD)OAT LATERAL DEL 01DS (1/2 MI DS HDQ)- DEL OAT LATERAL DEL 23-24OHMAR LATERAL DEL 02-4OHMAR LATERAL + DEL 24-25OHMAR LATERAL + DEL 25-2~OLIVE LATERAL DEL 20A-23OLIVE LATERAL DEL 24-26ORANGE LATERAL 1HDG-DEL 4ORANGE LATERAL + DEL 04-5ORANGE LATERAL DEL 23-24ORIENT LATERAL DEL 02-2AORIENT LATERAL DEL 2~22ORITA LATERAL 1HDQ (I/4 MI DS)-DEL ORITA LATERAL DEL 4-5ORITA LATERAL DEL 7-21OSAGE LATERAL HDQ-DEL 5OXALIS LATERAL 1HOG-DEL 3OXALIS LATERAL DEL 7-8OXALIS LATERAL DEL 8-10OXALIS LATERAL HWY 115-DEL 27PALMETTO LATERAL 1HDG-DEL 2PALMETTO LATERAL 1PAMPAS DR (DS DEL 2)-DEL 5/4/4APALMETTO LATERAL DEL 37~8PEACH LATERAL DEL 2-5PEAR 9TH ST-PIPE HDG-DEL 55PEAR CANAL DEL 33-45PEAR CANAL DEL 53C-(~ (HOLT RD)PEAR LATERAL 1 DEL 43-ENDPEPPER CANAL + DEL 3A(US).4PEPPER CANAL + OELPEPPER CANAL + HOG-DELlPEPPER LATERAL DEL 23-28PINE CANAL + DEL 2-4PINE CANAL + HDG-DEL 2PLUM LATERAL + 1HDG-OEL 2PLUM LATERAL + DELPLUM LATERAL + DELl9POMELO LATERAL GEL 21-23

LATERAL LATERALPROBE PROBE EARTHEARTH LINED REACH TOP

SEEPAGE SEEPAGELENGTHWIDTHAF/YR AF/YR FEET FEET IN/HR

ON%

31.32 0.99 5,277 44.6 0.54 37.2109.67 3.00 3,958 17.2 2.36 88.826.69 1.30 6,453 12.7 0.20 38.132.68 2.11 10,275 12.1 0.40 46.370,43 3.00 7,991 16.1 1.40 92.951.77 3.36 5,463 18.7 0.45 95.410.78 1.22 2,694 22.7 0.60 89.797.51 1.82 2,677 17.4 3.37 94.211.82 0.83 2,588 13.6 0.20 53.838.88 0.76 2,~68 14.5 1.49 49.5

113,15 2.18 6,409 18.2 2.59 63.053.99 1,17 5,265 15.7 2.62 44.3

188.40 4.15 5,582 18.1 2.82 97.165.70 1,20 2,641 17.7 5.78 100.015.66 1,99 3,777 18.7 0.34 73.620.8~ 0.71 1,295 16.5 1.02 88.3

130.48 1.41 3,479 22.3 2.76 71.493.43 2.82 5,065 20.5 2.00 99.616.37 1.28 2,881 28.3 0.60 99.625.97 2.53 5,243 24.8 0.40 99.5

122.64 3.97 9,470 14.8 5.43 77.486.64 2.25 3,328 20.6 1.49 88.712.30 1.30 2,645 15.0 0.60 80.218.30 1.60 2,686 16.8 0.50 80.240.38 1.20 5,462 15.3 2.3~ 41.521.15 0.55 1,325 13.0 6.00 89.1~0.47 1.15 1,524 16.0 6.00 87.618.22 0.50 2,703 9.8 0.39 24.9

190.38 3.06 5,083 17.4 4.13 83.337_14 1.14 1,997 9.4 0.60 37.310.29 0.87 1.418 21.7 0.60 80.146.08 2.18 6,047 15.4 1.04 62.88.71 0.38 2,579 13.3 1.10 14.2

140.91 1.64 1,629 21.9 4.19 ~0.627.65 2,46 2.473 34.5 3.75 90.229.69 0.80 777 17.7 6.00 92.05~.57 3.68 7,939 18.3 0.60 74.659.52 1.52 1,931 12.0 1 .~2 68.378.78 1.03 1,3~ 14.5 8.00 88.928.63 0.16 2~7 21.5 8.00 86.027.61 0.83 1,116 15.0 4,45 86.027.55 1.60 3,257 18.0 2.40 83.465,92 1,71 3,915 19.0 4.71 74.8

LATERAL LATERAL LATERALPROBE PROBE PROBE

NET NET NET SHUTEVAP START UP DOWN CORREC-

SAVINGS SAVINGS SAVINGS TIONAF/YR AF/YR AF/YR FACTOR

2.11 77.30 3.96 1.054.72 9.58 0.55 1.043.33 91.08 13.28 1.384.42 70.58 11 .IN] 1,28

12.38 2,05 0.21 1.169.20 4.32 .0.24 1.406.06 0.17 1.80 1.053.79 2,67 0.08 0.991.78 11.67 1.10 1.452.01 33.71 3.09 1.026.73 21.97 6.86 0.973.71 39.38 7.17 0.937.78 2.11 0.44 1.036.30 0.50 0.30 0.935.09 2.8~ 4,14 1.411.74 1.21 0.21 1.225.86 2.79 2.27 1.05

10.33 0.11 0.14 1.059.25 0.01 0.02 1

14.30 0.00 0.04 1.0510.18 1.38 4.38 0.915.51 15.75 4.89 1.053.70 1.50 1.30 1.31

10.30 8.90 2.40 1.354.68 10.17 6.14 0.931.11 1.14 ~).16 0.911.76 1.95 <).23 0.911.58 10.60 -1.87 1.156.29 24.63 1.45 0.950.00 0.00 0.00 1.142.55 4.46 0.74 1.055.~0 9.34 6.40 1.140.71 6.75 2.82 0.902.44 6.57 .0.0~ 1.057.eO 0.33 0.55 1.050.80 0.85 0.11 0.919,95 8.55 10.34 1.300.68 9.26 -1.08 1.081.13 10.00 0.11 0.910.4~ 1.67 0.0~ 1.050.95 2.05 -0.07 0.944.52 3.24 1.08 1.035.82 15.99 4.9~ 0.92

AOJUSTEDEARTH

SEEPAGEAF/YR

32.~114.5938.9341.~81.6072.6711.~95.9417.~37.72

110.1040.95

163.5563.97

25.38138.~97.9717.1727.~

111.18

16.1324.~37.4919.2054.97

1~.~38.7910.79

7.81147.76

27.14

71.74

28.~61.44

ADJUSTEDLINED

SEEPAGEAF/YR

3.5610.804.687.60

10.8017_104.396.552.99?-747.854.21

14.944.327.16

5.0810.154.549.11

14.298.104.685.764.323.684.141.60

11,024.103.137.651.375.938.86

13.255.473.710.5~2.995.766.16

ESTIMATEDANNUALWATER

CONSERVEDAF/YR

112.67118.74139.92121.1385.4473.8614.9695.9328.6573.79

137.81

63.7526.97

142.66

21.91

112.81108.9017.95

18.29

29.47201.81

15.41

16.72150.81

79.2731.~

31.47

Page 26: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

CONCRETE LINING WATER CONSERVATION INFORMATION TABLE. THROUGH DECEMBER 1994

CANAL LOCATION

REDWOOD CANAL DEL 06..15/18/17AREDWOOD CANAL DEL 19 (D~,HD [.AT 11)-27( HD LAT REDWOOD CANAL DEL 92-98REDWOOD LAT 3 + 1HDG-DEL 45REDWOOD LAT 3 + DEL 45~48 (END)REDWOOD LAT 4 + 1HDG-DEL 48 (END)REDWOOD LAT 5 DEL 64~6REDWOOD LAT 6 + 1HDG-DEL 65REDWOOD LAT 6 + DEL ¢~62 (END)ROCKWOOD CANAL DEL 031/32-33ROCKWOOD CANAL DEL 036-42ROCKWOOD CANAL DEL 133-136ROCKWOOD LAT 2 HDQ-DEL 37C (END)ROCKWOOO LAT 5 HDQ-DEL 145 (END)ROSE CANAL 1HOG-DELROSE CANAL DEL 30 (HOQ LAT 2)-45 (HOG LAT ROSE CANAL DEL 80~3 (END)ROSE LATERAL 1 HOG-DEL 15 (END)ROSE LATERAL 3 DEL 36 (RALPH RD)~37ROSE LATERAL 6 HOGoOEL 598 (END)ROSELLE CANAL HOG-ENDRUBBER CANAL DEL ~11A/LAT 6 HOG)SO ALAMO CANAL OEL 116/1171117A-119 (END/SPILL)SO ALAMO LAT 02P HOG-US DEL 17A (HWYSO ALAMO LAT 03 HOG-0EL 22A/23 (END)SO ALAMO LAT 04 HOG-DEL 26 (END)SO ALAMO L~T 17 HOG-OEL 10~ (END)SO ALAMO LAT 18 HDG-DEL 113 (END)SPRUCE CANAL 1HOG-DEL 37SPRUCE CANAL DEL 3~32SPRUCE CANAL DEL 32~34A (END)SPRUCE CANAL + DEL 37~q~NDAL LAT 1 SPILLSPRUCE LAT 1 HOS-DEL ~ (DS HOVLEY RD)SPRUCE LAT8 + DELg~I00A (END)SPRUCE LAT B + HDG-DEL 59SUMAC CANAL OEL 57~3ATAMARACK CANAL HOG-DEL 198/200THISTLE CANAL 1HOG-DEL 8THISTLE CANAL DEL 3~ENDTHISTLE LAT 4 DEL 1~15THISTLE LAT 4 OEL 2~ENDTHISTLE LAT 5 DEL I~18THISTLE LAT 5 DEL 27-END

LATERAL LATERALPROBE PROBE EARTHEARTH LINED REACH TOP

SEEPAGESEEPAGELENGTH WIDTH KIe= ONAF/YR AF/YR FEET FEET IN/HR %

102.93 12.11 5.494 28.9 1.28 98.2148.54 10.30 4.678 28.3 2.00 96.064.23 5.42 9,510 17.8 0.32 63.00.96 0.03 115 9.3 2.00 43.1

38.21 0.51 2,409 10.1 3.68 36.817.39 0.33 1,330 10.0 0.20 33.349.15 0.82 2.333 17.9 2.O0 67.88.07 0.04 19~ 11.9 8.00 35.0

26,40 0,17 1,189 9,6 1,65 22.320.20 3.71 2.645 40.0 0.60 96.029.98 B.94 5.414 37.5 0.60 95.9

182.16 8.46 7,837 27.7 1.26 93.549.97 0.64 1,984 6.50 0.26 51.6

104.90 1.81 8,096 12.1 2.20 4~.610~.52 7.36 7,746 22.9 1.29 94.839.81 5.29 6,092 18.8 0.47 94.17.54 1.26 2,904 24.9 0.20 40.2

99.75 6.34 6,464 10.0 0.34 46.717.07 0.38 1,305 12.5 0.20 56.5

106.97 1.0~ 2.904 5.0 1.53 87.738.09 1.25 6,373 10.6 2.49 37.252.26 10.75 8,021 24.9 0.44 90,75.29 0.26 1,620 12.0 0.20 11.4

15.83 0.26 5~3 16.5 3.60 52.59.87 0.07 1,315 10.1 6.00 12.1

14.07 0.12 1,399 12.4 4.33 22.033.71 0.04 772 11.0 6.00 8.432.58 0,03 1,344 7.8 6.00 5.6

261.67 9.00 2,671 41.7 6.00 98.716.90 0.94 2,719 16.0 O.eO 29.73.47 0.20 2,960 14.5 0.52 10.9

101.51 5.98 2.645 24.2 2.70 98.6211.82 0.gO 2,738 10.3 2.00 48.822.21 0.19 1,798 14.4 1.74 15.659.46 1.04 6.543 12.0 0.90 26.698.29 3.64 5,847 18.1 1.97 75.0

365.13 3.01 5,238 33.7 B.00 99.529.47 10.17 0,086 28.2 0.65 91.751.06 2.0e 10,714 15.5 1.53 52.075.49 0.44 1,407 10.0 6.00 50.520.52 0.92 2,792 23.0 B.O0 1.7

53~.38 1,81 5,344 2t.6 4.44 ~0.445.74 0.12 3,906 21.0 4.87 11.6

(S:WICKIL~CL~)4CLWOl, REVISED 10/7/94)

LATERAL LATERAL LATERALPROBE PROBE PROBE ESTIMATED

NET NET NET SHUT ADJUSTEDADJUSTED ANNUALEVAP START UP DOWN CORREC~EARTH LINED WATER

SAVINGS SAVINGS SAVINGS TION SEEPAGE SEEPAGE CONSERVEDAF/YR AF/YR AF/YR FACTOR AF/YR AF/YR AF/YR

11.73 7.60 .0.26 1.05 107.93 43.609.58 9.99 -1.69 1.03 155.76 37.0e

10.26 90.71 27.24 1.39 89.27 19.510.04 0.26 0.12 0.96 0.92 0.111.36 1.52 2.42 0.87 33.41 1.840.97 9.26 -2.06 1.36 23.60 1.193.02 21.78 4.00 1.03 50.44 2.950.12 3.03 1.09 0.84 6.78 0.140.58 13.52 4.30 0.90 23.79 0.618.94 4.84 .0.39 1.05 21.18 13.36

15.11 2.42 2.57 1.0~ 31.44 31.1016.05 16.36 1.57 1.05 191.01 30.4~0.85 4.53 -2.86 1.44 71.89 2.303.02 148.44 11.71 0.95 157.24 6.52

13.15 1.98 1.22 1.05 113.79 26.507.84 1.11 0.55 1.39 55.46 19.045.81 18.38 54.04 1.05 7.91 4.543.00 46.~6 0.55 1.32 131.39 22.821,00 9.5~ 1.35 1.45 24.82 1.370.40 2.67 -0.69 1.13 122.88 3.822.36 27.63 21.63 0.91 34.73 4.50

16.46 11.95 0.08 1.05 65.2e 38.700.~ 21.30 7.30 1.13 5.98 0.940.74 4.51 1.16 0.91 14.3~ 0.940.30 0.34 3.69 0.81 7.50 0.250.54 44.11 11.98 0.63 11.73 0.430.31 9.47 2.38 0.50 26.99 0.140.21 8.65 0.30 0.50 26.94 0.187.95 3.31 2.65 1.05 274.38 32.402.07 22.22 20.00 1.10 18.55 3.380.62 7.05 16.93 0.95 3.30 0.724.02 1.01 0.29 1.05 t06.44 21.561.86 55.75 0.95 0.97 206.20 3.241,06 16.38 6.90 0.87 19.24 0.683.55 ~.58 8.97 1.00 59.65 3.746.24 17.74 3.53 1.05 193.95 13.10

19.6~ 0.34 "0.04 1.0~ 382.87 10.846.64 4.37 0.50 1.05 30.93 30.909.91 3.72 38.81 1.03 52.53 7.521.64 17.14 3.11 0.86 63,06 1.580.33 2.03 1.35 1.03 21.52 0.078.00 33,98 8.42 1.0~ 3~5.87 5.801.53 2.20 5,09 1.05 47.98 0.43

83.40136.56197.97

1.2536.9850.5876.2910.8841.8921.2220.43

194.5377-11

313.89103.6545.918.1.58

160.77

121.4481.8557.0904.3119.8~11.8867.9139.01

255.89

27.18

261.3242-92

134.98118.3839Z0114.0197.4465.37

400.37

Page 27: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

CONCRETE LINING WATER CONSERVATION INFORMATION TABLE. THROUGH DECEMBER 1994 (S:~VICKIE~CL~g4CLWQ1. REVISED 10/7/94)

LATERAL LATERALPROBE PROBE EARTHEARTH LINED REACH TOP

SEEPAGE SEEPAGELENGTHWIDTH ~ ONCANAL LOCATION AF/YR AF/YR FEET FEET IN/HR

THISTLE LAT 7 DEL ~-18 (SPILUEND) 72.90 1.41 6,577 13.3 2.37 39.0THORN CANAL 1HDQ-DEL 6/7/8 258.18 3.12 6.003 20.6 1.63 89.0THORN CANAL DEL 20/21-25/26 75.33 0.84 2.657 24.0 1.50 65.8TOWNSHIP LATERAL DEL 22-25 (SPRR) 55.04 3.19 7,658 19.9 0.60 61.8TRIFOLIUM EXT DEL 16 (POE HDQ)-21 (BARTH RD & LAT) 40.96 8.79 6.458 28.5 0.63 97.6TRIFOLIUM EXT DEL 21(BARTH RD)-US 50(OESERT RANCH) 131.26 11.39 10,473 22.6 1.60 97.6TRIFOLIUM LAT03 DEL 4~50 417.19 5.79 10,637 21.0 1.43 63.9TRIFOLIUM LAT 03 DEL 51-52 69.61 0.98 2.654 19.3 2.00 56.1TRIFOLIUM LAT03 + DEL53-57 6.72 0.35 2,025 13.2 0.20 29.4TRIFOLIUM LAT03 + DEL57-58 58.57 0.28 1,257 11.1 1.64 29.4TRIFOLIUM LAT 05 DEL 91-08 DEL 91H (HWY 68),(PIPEUNE) 29.24 0.13 2.581 10.2 5.81 9.6TRIFOLIUM LAT 07 DEL 131-134 65.34 0.97 2,665 19.5 1.47 67.0TRIFOLIUM LAT 07 DEL 135A-137A 75.54 1.09 4.012 20.5 1.05 51.5TRIFOLIUM LAT 08 IHDG-DEL 142 3.16 0.41 735.00 23.5 0.28 85.6TRIFOLIUM LAT08 DEL 150-151 75.03 1.64 2,981 14.9 0.98 68.7TRIFOLIUM LAT 11 DEL 208/209 (BAUGHMAN RD)-210 68.26 0.64 1.394 30.5 2.88 64.3TRIFOLIUM LAT 12 HDQ-US DEL 224 (EXSlSTING LINING) 171.51 2.70 5.783 18.0 6.00 75.4TRIFOUUM tAT 13 1HDG-OEL 247 274.65 0.81 2.340 28.5 5.00 80.5TRIFOLIUM LAT 13 GEL 25~258A 352.49 1.83 6.494 18.2 4.92 64.1TRIFOUUM LAT 14 1HDG-DEL 264A/265 21.91 0.5~ 2.170 16.5 2.00 71.BTRIFOUUM LAT 14 DEL 264A/2~%267 91.58 0.64 3,097 23.5 2.00 46.1TRIFOUUM LAT 15 1HD4~ - DEL 284 10.12 0.43 1,490 13.9 3.01 62.9TRIFOLIUM t.AT 15 DEL2~4-25~ 276.38 0.79 4,922 19.9 6.00 43.2TUBEROSE CANAL DEL 128/12~133 61.02 1.31 3,886 16.7 2.50 68.3TUBEROSE CANAL DEL 13~140 17.21 0.36 2.613 15.9 2.65 26.3TUBEROSE CANAL DEL 142-143 22.12 0.16 2,679 15.1 4.80 9.0TUBEROSE CANAL DEL 148-WSM SPILL (END) 0.00 0.03 2.503 15.9 3.46 0.0VAIL CANAL LAT 4-LAT 6 57.40 13.97 10,339 34.0 0.51 94.7VAIL LAT 1 DEL 118/11~-123 6.86 0.63 2.721 18.8 0.05 40.5VAIL LAT 2A DEL 25~257 41.89 0.76 1,352 10.0 2.00 77.0VAIL LAT 2A DEL 2~1-252 38.53 0.57 1.329 11.4 2.00 06.7VAIL LAT 2A DEL 25~2¢5 30.17 1.02 2.630 14.7 1.10 62.1VAIL LAT 2A DEL 270-271 2.64 0.23 I,~ 15.0 0.O8 28.1VAIL LAT 3 OEL 305-309 93.43 3.27 5,277 24.4 0.91 68.4VAIL LAT 3A DEL 353-3~1 158.97 5.30 10,572 14.3 1.30 65.0VAIL LAT 3A DEL 381-,365 (KUNS RD) 155.99 1.37 5.290 13.4 2.77 61.9VAIL EAT 4 1HDQ-DEL 405 122.95 1.18 5,267 21.1 1.53 96.2VAIL LAT 4 DEL 40~411 91.70 1.20 2.574 13.0 1.63 94.6VAIL LAT 4 DEL 411-413 243,50 1.20 2,660 14.3 2.65 94.0VAIL LAT 4 DEL 413-415 259.00 1.10 2,~0~ 14.8 6.00 94.6VAIL LAT 4 OEL 418-422 51.02 0.76 4,001 18.6 2.23 49.6VAIL LAT 4A 0EL 453-459 329.35 2.22 7.953 16.5 5.56 93.5VAIL LAT 4A DEL 459-4~1 28.23 0.22 2,~8 15,9 3.00 27.6

LATERAL LATERAL LATERALPROBE PROBE PROBE

NET NET NET SHUTEVAP START UP DOWN CORREC~

SAVINGS ,~AVINGS ~AVINGS TIONAF/YR AF/YR AF/YR FACTOR

3.80 9.48 16.18 0.9212.59 13.20 3.51 1.055.35 10.86 2.08 1.059.40 18.62 1 1.90 1.25

12.16 0.35 1.47 1.0515.24 1.12 3.17 1.0518.12 45.79 2.03 1.053.58 13.01 3.46 0.990.59 35.29 1.11 1.331.05 3.45 5.41 0.930.30 21.94 3.10 0.803.71 3.97 1.63 1.O85.19 53.03 14.75 1.051.54 0.34 1,11 1.051,80 6.99 -0.30 1.173.98 4.33 0.58 1.056.79 10.51 4,62 0.896.87 1.91 1.37 1.058.96 34.23 21.89 0.gO3.34 1.19 1.12 1.045.64 21.52 35.97 1.051.~O 0.20 2.74 0.955.45 74.44 13.34 0.855.27 12.91 14.38 0.991.51 14.61 4.73 0.871.32 3.67 14.53 0.810.00 0.00 0.00 0.79

27.31 10.24 -15.34 1.052.35 6.56 6.38 1.580.50 6.23 0.58 1.050.77 10.25 0.41 1.022.30 27.01 3.53 1.121.00 7.31 11.11 1.53

12.18 14.98 6.72 1.0510.68 34.98 8.40 1.164.29 59.18 9.99 0.989.85 5.64 1.62 1.052.90 2.40 .0,20 1.133.40 4.80 0.60 1.043.70 7.~0 0.20 0.924.02 44.92 29.99 0.989.45 92.42 ~0.29 0.921.27 30.82 22.34 0.87

ADJUSTEDEARTH

SEEPAGEAF/YR

67.22270.7278.9969.0742.95

137.64437.4669.248.95

54.60

70.8179.213.31

67.62

153.36267.99318.3922.709~.019.65

235.44

15.0417.810.00

65.1910.73

4.0397.97

183.68149.89126.92103.64252.12246.76

24.51

ADJUSTEDUNED

SEEPAGEAF/YR

5.0811.233.02

11.4831.6441.0020.843.531.261.010.473.493.921.465.902.309.722.926.592.122.301.582.844.721.300.580.00

2.272.742.053.670.83

11.7719.064.934.254.324.323.982.747.000.79

ESTIMATEDANNUALWATER

CONSERVEOAF/YR

91.61288.7994.2797.7125.32

116.16482.5585.57

46.3576.63

148.264.83

90.4176.06

165.5~295.23374.88

15~.8312.62

88.2734.5935.750.00

32.1123.73

48.8163.1122.62

120.08218.67218.42141.99104.42

125.19438.7078.15

Page 28: Projects 2, 5, 10, 11, 16, and 7 Main and Lateral Canal

CONCRETE LINING WATER CONSERVATION INFORMATION TABLF~ THROUGH DECEMBER 1994 (S:WICKIE~CL~94CLWQ1, REVISED 10/7/~4)

LATERAL LATERALPROBE PROBE EARTHEARTH LINED REACH TOP

SEEPAGE SEEPAGE LENGTH WIDTH Ir~¢= ONCANAL LOCATION AF/YR AF[YR FEET FEET IWHR %

VAIL LAT 5 DEL 50~507 245.71 1.88 5,284 20.4 2.05 63.1VAIL LAT 8 DEL 606 TO DEL 612 237.06 1.19 7,889 12.4 6.20 31.50VAIL LATERAL § + 1HDG-DEL 602 6.15 0.46 2,587 14.0 0.60 35.4VAIL LATERAL 8 + DEL 602~06 42.03 0.54 2,722 14.9 3.84 35.4WESTMORLAND CANAL HDG-EXISTING LINING 145.10 0.44 1,862 8.0 6.03 55.9WISTERIA CANAL DEL 37/48 (LAT 2)-US 49 (EXIST LINING) 12.24 3.45 2,554 21.6 0.20 95,5WISTERIA CANAL DEL 7:F96 22.20 2.24 2,762 19.5 0.20 92.8WISTERIA CANAL DEL 9~110/111 46.45 2.85 5,106 14.1 0.56 74.0WISTERIA L~T 5 HDQoDEL 70 165,24 2.21 9,589 11.7 1.07 57.4WISTERIA LAT 8 H[X~US DEL 8~ (WISTERIA LAT 6/0 70.48 3.2~ 8,533 17.0 0.20 64.8WISTERIA LAT 6A H[X~END 3.88 0.05 1,236 16.5 1.01 3.7WISTERIA LAT 7 DEL 101-102 37.53 0.96 2,615 12.0 0.20 63.8WOODBINE CANAL DEL 3~51 123.72 3.91 8,330 16.3 0.60 ~6.2WOODBINE CANAL DEL 54-50/57 (END) 22.00 0.42 2.784 17.4 0.43 18.7WOODBINE LAT 2 HD<~DEL 5H 138.01 3.03 12,955 10.5 0.88 57.9WOODBINE LAT 3 HDG-DEL 11 52.07 0.46 3,604 10.8 2.40 31.7WORMWOOD CANAL + DEL 84A/85A-90A 27.70 1.11 5,280 14.5 0.20 36.9WORMWOO0 CANAL HDQ-DEL 9 64.47 6.57 5,828 27.8 1.46 95.2

Total= 18.058.62 199.51 mime

+ - SecUo~ Added Fo~ 1994

LATERAL LATERAL LATERALPROBE PROBE PROBE

NET NET NET SHUTEVAP START UP DOWN CORREC-

SAVINGS SAVINGS SAVINGS TIONAF/YR AF/YR AF/Y’R FACTOR

7.40 59.32 4.98 1.053.72 48.52 38.13 0.631.10 5.48 1.29 1.131.79 18.38 6.20 0.870.50 57.78 0.76 0.875.49 0.57 -3.85 1.054.41 4,52 2.25 1.525.09 10,90 2.07 1.315.03 69.41 26.01 1.118.92 59.39 9.03 1.480.42 7.93 15.31 0.822.34 7.35 2.02 1.519.51 100.14 18.42 1.273.11 27,70 25.48 1.075.37 87.17 9.13 1.161.05 41.12 8.50 0.903.75 75.67 19.50 1.38

12.37 1.04 -1.13 1.05

1272.9 4516.9 1637.1

ADJUSTEDEARTH

SEEPAGEAF/YR

257.65197.68

6.9738.50

126.1112.8333.8363.42

164.0~103.97

3.1958.72

157.12

158.6546.8138.15

187g~.2

6.4 22.6 8.2 1.04 94.2

ADJUSTEDLINED

SEEPAGEAF/YR

6.774.281.661.941.58

12.428.06

10.267.96

11.740.183.46

14.O81.51

10.911.734.00

2070.4

10.4

ESTIMATEDANNUALWATER

CONSERVEDAF/YR

322.58283.77

13.1960.92

183.542.62

38.9471.22

278.551~9.5826.6764.97

271.1278.34

95.75133.13

24,153AFY

121.1AFY/MI

S:\VICKIE~CL~)4CLWQ1Revbed 10/7/94