property capital markets report - amazon s3...reading, australian mortgage holders are continuing to...

Property capital markets reportSPRING 2013

On the moveInvestors flock back to property markets

Economic outlookWill demand for credit stay at record lows?

Policy poserLessons from New Zealand’s mortgage lending market

State by stateAnalysis of home values, sales and rents across Australia

RP Data can help you to:

f Quickly and accurately confirm collateral values f Expose hidden risks within a loan file f Build confidence and reliability with investment decisions

RP Data is the only provider in Australia that offers a comprehensive risk evaluation and property valuation framework allowing you to make prudent, risk adjusted decisions.

Ring to speak to one of our Banking and Finance Consultants on 1300 734 318 or visit rpdata.com

Giving you the confidence to make better decisions with superior property and market information


f Gain valuable insights into Australian property dynamics at a macro or micro level f Make better informed decisions with predictive insights and dynamic risk management f Gain the competitive edge with solutions that expose hidden risks or opportunities within

investment alternatives


Providing vital insights and analytics in an ever-changing property market

1

02 Introduction

03 Executive summary

04 Economic overviewWhile economic conditions are comparatively strong, Australia is not immune from the effect of global economic uncertainty.

14 Lessons from New ZealandWhat can be learnt from New Zealand policy makers and their efforts to put the brakes on that country’s housing market?

16 Housing market overviewSales transactions and home values are generally increasing but prudence remains the watch word for Australian households.

24 State by State analysisSydney and New South Wales ...................................................... 24Melbourne and Victoria ...................................................................... 26Brisbane and Queensland ............................................................... 28Adelaide and South Australia ......................................................... 30Perth and Western Australia ............................................................ 32Hobart and Tasmania .......................................................................... 34Darwin ............................................................................................................. 36Canberra ........................................................................................................ 38

ContentsProperty capital markets reportSPRING 2013

Publisher Andrew Stabback T: +61 2 02 9376 9501 E: [email protected] Managing Editor: Andrew Starke T: +61 2 9376 9506 E: [email protected] Art Direction: Six Black Pens, www.sixblackpens.com, [email protected]

All rights reserved © 2013. No part of this work covered by the publisher’s copyright may be reproduced in any form by any means, graphic, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or information storage and retrieval, without the written permission of the publisher. Any unauthorised use of this publication will result in immediate legal proceedings.

Publisher’s Note: Although every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained within this publication, neither the publishers, authors nor their employers can be held liable for any inaccuracies, errors or omissions. Readers are strongly advised to contact their professional advisor before entering into any contract to buy or sell any security.

Asia-Pacific Banking & Finance Suite 103, Level 1, 83 York Street, Sydney, NSW 2000 financialpublications.com.au

2

IntroductionRP Data’s research team is very pleased to bring you the fourth edition of the RP Data Property Capital Markets Report. The report is released at a time when Australia has a newly elected government, the economy is transitioning away from a mining-related infrastructure boom and housing markets are well into a recovery with both dwelling values and transaction volumes on the rise.

The residential housing market in Australia is the country’s largest and most valuable asset class; worth an estimated $4.9 trillion, which is about three and a half times the value of Australia’s stock market and about three times the value of Australia’s combined superannuation funds.

Dwelling values across the combined capital city index have increased by 3.8 per cent over the most recent financial year. Based on early data flows, it is clear that dwelling values have continued to rise over recent months.

Buyer numbers have moved from their low base over the past year, rising by close to twenty per cent compared with a year ago.

Australians are viewing the housing market in a more positive light, and buyer demand is being fuelled by the low cost of debt and the recent improvements in affordability, brought about by the 7.7 per cent fall in dwelling values recorded between late 2010 and May 2012, as well as the low interest rate environment.

The burgeoning housing recovery is occurring as the Australian economy enters a period of transition. The resources infrastructure boom has been winding down since commodity prices peaked in late 2011, creating some challenges for economic growth.

Policy makers are now looking towards housing construction to fill part of the economic void that has been left by the slowdown in the resources sector. To date the economic transition could be described as relatively sedate, however there has been a considerable lift in the number of new dwellings approved for construction, which is likely to gather pace as the housing market recovery gathers momentum.

With the economy shifting down a gear, there has also been some softening in the national labour force. The rate of unemployment has drifted higher, with the national rate as at July sitting at 5.7 per cent. The reading remains low from a historical measure and an international stand point.

Despite the slightly higher unemployment reading, Australian mortgage holders are continuing to demonstrate their capacity to pay down debt. Housing loan arrears remain well contained, with the percentage of mortgages more than ninety days overdue well below one per cent.

Looking forward, the Australian housing market is likely to see a continuation of the growth conditions that are currently evident. The market drivers will continue to be a mix of low interest rates, a strong population growth rate that is trending higher while dwelling construction fails to keep pace. Vacancy rates are currently below 3 per cent across most capital cities. This suggests that rental markets will continue to experience upwards pressure.

At the time of writing virtually every housing market indicator was heading in a positive direction. Homes are selling faster, vendors are discounting their prices by a lesser amount and auction clearance rates are consistently higher than 70 per cent.

Overall, the Australian housing market will continue to face some challenges. Housing affordability is an ongoing issue, particularly in the larger cities such as Sydney and Melbourne where dwelling prices are higher. Softening labour markets will result in more Australians being unemployed or under employed. This in turn is likely to have an impact on consumer confidence and, willingness to take on additional credit. The economic transition away from the mining sector and towards other sectors of the economy such as construction, manufacturing, tourism and retail remains in the early phases and the outcome remains uncertain.

We hope that the spring 2013 edition of the RP Data Property Capital Markets Report is a useful reference guide. More up to date information and market indicators are always available at www.rpdata.com.

Introduction | RP Data Property Capital Markets Report, Spring 2013

Tim Lawless Research Director, RP Data

3

Executive summaryWhile economic indicators are comparatively strong, Australia has not been immune to the effect of global economic uncertainty and financial markets turmoil. The local economy is currently experiencing below average levels of economic growth, falling terms of trade (from record high levels) and lower commodity prices are undoubtedly impacting economic growth. As a result, demand for credit is growing at near-record low levels and Australian households are more focussed on saving rather than spending, with the national household savings ratio now relatively stable at their highest levels in 25 years.

With mortgage rates anticipated to remain low over the next six months it will be important to monitor how the housing market responds, particularly in light of a slowing resources sector, an anticipated increase in the unemployment rate, low levels of credit growth and a high level of household savings. The Reserve Bank (RBA) still has scope to cut official interest rates further if required.

The residential housing market is Australia’s single largest asset class with a total estimated value of $4.89 trillion as at June 2013. In comparison, the total value of listed Australian equities is almost three and a half times smaller at $1.4 trillion.

The national gross domestic product over the year to March 2013 was $1.48 trillion indicating that the value of housing assets is 3.3 times larger than the economy’s annual output. With such a large proportion of Australian wealth allocated to residential housing, providing timely, complete and accurate measurements about the performance of Australia’s largest and most valuable asset class is essential.

Over the 12 months to June 2013, home values across the eight capital cities of Australia, which account for 65.5 per cent of the national population, have increased by 3.8 per cent. In contrast, over the 12 months to June 2012, combined capital city home values had fallen by 3.6 per cent, indicating a sharp reversal of the housing market’s performance

over the past year. Over the first six months of 2013, home values have increased by 3.0 per cent, indicating that much of the annual value growth has occurred during 2013. Capital city home values have been recording moderate rises over the past 12 months, however, they remain 2.9 per cent lower than they were at their peak in October 2010.

Most encouraging is the fact that the rise in home values is being accompanied by a rise in transaction numbers. Over the three months to May 2013, capital city house and unit sales were 19.3 per cent higher than over the same period a year ago. The fact that values are rising in line with transaction numbers suggests that the current increase in values is likely to be more sustainable.

Sydney houses took an average of 38 days to sell in June 2013 compared to 58 days a year earlier. Units are taking an average of 31 days to sell currently, compared to 46 days a year earlier.

Melbourne homes are selling much quicker than they were at the same time a year ago. In June 2012, it took an average of 57 days to sell a house and 60 days to sell a unit. Currently it takes an average of 41 days to sell a house and 37 days for a unit.

It is taking a similar length of time to sell a Brisbane home to what it was a year ago. Houses and units are currently selling after an average of 62 days and 65 days respectively on the market. In June 2012 it took an average of 63 days to sell a house and 68 days to sell a unit.

Homes are also taking a shorter length of time to sell across Adelaide than they were at the same time last year. A year ago, houses took an average of 70 days to sell and units 74 days. In June 2013 houses took an average of 56 days to sell and units took 54 days.

The length of time it takes to sell a house in Perth has also improved over the year. Houses are currently taking an average of 49 days to sell and units 52 days. In June 2012 they were taking an average of 60 days and 59 days respectively.

RP Data Property Capital Markets Report, Spring 2013 | Executive summary

The national gross domestic product over the year to March 2013 was $1.48 trillion indicating that the value of housing assets is 3.3 times larger than the economy’s annual output.

4

Economic overview | RP Data Property Capital Markets Report, Spring 2013

Key StatisticsOfficial interest rates are currently at their lowest level in more than 50 years at 2.5 per cent. As a result, we are starting to see a response by the housng market both in terms of capital growth and sales activity.

The following pages detail some of the key economic factors which are affecting the Australian residential housing market.

According to the International Monetary Fund, Australia was the 12th largest economy in the world in 2012, representing 2.2 per cent of the world’s economy. In comparison to most other developed economies, Australia is performing well, albeit economic growth more recently has transitioned to a below trend rate of growth. Australia hasn’t had a recession since the early 1990’s, housing markets have not collapsed following the financial crisis and the national unemployment rate remains at low levels.

Although economic conditions are comparatively strong, Australia is not immune to the effect of global economic uncertainty and financial markets turmoil. The Australian economy is currently experiencing below average levels of economic growth, falling terms of trade (from record high levels) and lower commodity prices. As a result, demand for credit is growing at near record low levels and Australian households are more focussed on saving rather than spending, with the national household savings ratio now fairly stable at the highest levels in 25 years.

Official interest rates are currently at their lowest level in more than 50 years,

Economic overviewWhile economic conditions are comparatively strong, Australia is not immune to the effect of global economic uncertainty.

RP Data Property Capital Markets Report, Spring 2013 | Economic overview

5

Key StatisticsIn the recent RBA bi-annual Statement on Monetary Policy, the RBA expects inflation will remain within the target range throughout 2013 and remain below 3 per cent at least until the end of 2015.

8%

6%

4%

2%

0%

-2%

-4%

8%

6%

4%

2%

0%

-2%

-4%

Source: RP Data, ABS

G2: Gross Domestic ProductMar-83 to Mar-13

Quarterly change Annual change

Mar-83 Mar-88 Mar-93 Mar-98 Mar-03 Mar-08 Mar-13

12%

10%

8%

6%

4%

2%

0%

-2%

12%

10%

8%

6%

4%

2%

0%

-2%

Headline in�ation Source: RP Data, ABS

G1: Consumer Price Index (CPI)Jun-83 to Jun-13

Underlying in�ation

Jun-83 Jun-86 Jun-89 Jun-92 Jun-95 Jun-98 Jun-01 Jun-04 Jun-07 Jun-10 Jun-13

RBA target range

2.5 per cent. As a result we are starting to see a response by the housing market both in terms of capital growth and sales activity.

It is important to note that even though housing markets are recovering, there has been no deterioration in household savings, nor has there been a break out in housing credit growth.

Despite this strong economic position, the rate of unemployment (5.7 per cent in July) is currently at its highest level since September 2009 and Federal Treasury has recently stated that they are forecasting a peak in unemployment of 6.25 per cent in the middle of next year. If unemployment does reach this level, it would be the highest unemployment rate since September 2002. With the prospect of rising unemployment, this may dampen consumer confidence and demand for credit and subsequently impact on the national housing market.

With low mortgage rates anticipated to remain over at least the next six months, it will be important to monitor how the housing market responds, particularly in light of a slowing resources sector, an anticipated increase in the unemployment rate, low levels of credit growth and a high level of household savings. The RBA still has scope to cut official interest rates further if required.

Low inflation provides the Government scope for further monetary policy stimulus if required (See G1)The Consumer Price Index (CPI) is a quarterly measure of the level of price inflation within the Australian economy. As at June 2013, headline inflation was recorded at 2.4 per cent over the year. The RBA has a medium-term target rate for inflation of between two and three per cent which indicates inflation currently sits in the middle of their target range.

The RBA uses other core inflation indicators as its preferred measure, specifically the weighted median and the trimmed mean. Over the 12 months to June 2013, these measures were both recorded at 2.2 per cent and 2.6 per cent respectively, again indicating that inflation is comfortably contained. With headline and underlying inflation comfortably in the middle of the target range, it is clear that the RBA has scope, if required, to cut official interest rates further over the coming months.

You will note from the chart that the RBA has a target rate for inflation of 2 per cent to 3 per cent over the cycle. This target rate was introduced in the middle of 1993 and you can see that since that time, inflation has been much lower and has generally been contained within this target range.

Focussing on the CPI groups, inflation over

the past year has been highest in health (6.6 per cent), education (5.7 per cent), housing (5.3 per cent) and alcohol and tobacco (4.0 per cent). On the other hand, CPI has fallen by 0.5 per cent for transport, 0.3 per cent for clothing and footwear and 0.1 per cent for recreation and culture.

Recent forecasts by the RBA contained in their bi-annual Statement on Monetary Policy indicates that the RBA expects inflation will remain within the target range throughout 2013. In fact, the RBA forecasts inflation will remain below 3 per cent at least until the end of 2015.

Australia has not had a recession since the June 1991 quarter (See G2)Australia’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has increased by 0.6 per cent over the March 2013 quarter and is 2.6 per cent higher over the 12 months to March 2013. Australia has not been in recession (defined as two successive quarters of GDP contraction) since June 1991, more than 21 years ago. Over the 12 months to March 2013, the value of the domestic economy’s output was $1.48 trillion.

The GDP data for March 2013 showed


6

Key StatisticsAustralia’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has increased by 0.6 per cent over the March 2013 quarter and is now 2.6 per cent higher over the 12 months to March 2013.

110

100

90

80

70

60

50

40


G4: Terms of trade indexMar-73 to Mar-13110

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

Mar-73 Mar-77 Mar-81 Mar-85 Mar-01 Mar-97 Mar-93Mar-89 Mar-05 Mar-09 Mar-13

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

-5%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

-5%


G3: Household savings ratioMar-73 to Mar-13

Mar-73 Mar-77 Mar-81 Mar-85 Mar-01 Mar-97 Mar-93Mar-89 Mar-05 Mar-09 Mar-13

that the industries providing the largest contribution to overall GDP growth over the past year were: mining (9.9 per cent), financial and insurance services (9.6 per cent), construction (7.3 per cent) and manufacturing (7.1 per cent). Ownership of dwellings contributed a substantial 7.6 per cent to overall GDP over the year. This result, coupled with construction, highlights why the RBA is hopeful that housing construction can fill some of the void in the economy as investment in the mining sector falls from here. As a result of slowing mining investment, its contribution to overall GDP is also likely to slow.

The RBA and Treasury have recently lowered their forecast for economic growth this year to 2.25 per cent. Forecasts also anticipate economic growth of just 2.25 per cent for the 2013/14 financial year.

The ABS National Accounts also reveal that household disposable incomes have increased by just 1.1 per cent over the past year. Given the increased level of household savings and other economic indicators, it is clear that with less income growth, households are showing a lower propensity to spend the money they have available or take on additional debt.

Household savings remain at an elevated level (See G3)The ABS National Accounts data, which contains GDP, also details the level of savings by households which is measured by the household savings ratio. This ratio was recorded at 10.6 per cent over the March 2013 quarter and has averaged 9.8 per cent over the past five years. Based on current levels, household savings is at its highest level since 1987. As the chart shows, the jump in household savings over recent years has reversed the trend which commenced in 1974.

The decline in savings by households reached a record low in the June 2002 quarter when the ratio reached -2.4 per cent, which indicated households spent all of their disposable income plus an additional 2.4 per cent. Since that time, the savings ratio has been trending higher, with the increase hastened by the onset of the financial crisis. However, spending patterns had shown some signs of changing prior to the onset of the crisis.

The high level of household savings, we believe, is one of the reasons why there has been restraint in other areas of the economy, including retail trade and housing market activity.

Terms of trade is declining as mining investment peaks (See G4)The terms of trade index was recorded at 90.8 points over the March 2013 quarter, with the index having fallen by 14.7 per cent since it peaked over the September quarter of 2011. Having moved beyond the peak in the terms of trade, there is likely to be some impact on economic growth and other sectors of the Australian economy, given the recent strength of the mining and resources sector and its significant contribution to economic growth over recent years.

More recent data on commodity prices indicates that resource prices have continued to trend lower over recent months. However, commodity prices are lower than their 2011 peak, on average they remain significantly higher than historic levels.

Population growth continues to increase from already high levels (See G5)Australia’s population increased by 394,233 persons throughout the 2012 calendar year, up from an increase of 339,650 persons over the 2011 calendar year. In terms of the total population, Australia’s population increased by 1.8 per cent over the year which was in-line with the average annual increase over the past five years but, was the highest level of population growth since the 12 months to December 2009.


7

80,000

60,000

40,000

20,000

0

80,000

60,000

40,000

20,000

0


G5: Quarterly change in national population Dec-82 to Dec-12

Natural increase Net overseas migration

Dec-82 Dec-85 Dec-88 Dec-91 Dec-94 Dec-97 Dec-00 Dec-03 Dec-06 Dec-09 Dec-12

There are two components to population growth at the national level: net overseas migration and natural increase (births minus deaths). Both measures remain elevated on a historical basis with natural increase contributing 40 per cent of national population growth (158,319) and net overseas migration contributing the additional 60 per cent (235,914).

More recently available data on overseas arrivals and departures shows that net long-term overseas arrivals continue to increase and were at their highest annual level in June 2013 (306,500) since November 2009 (312,430). This is likely to be reflected over the coming quarters by further increases to net overseas migration which should drive population growth higher.

Of course, the increase in population translates to higher demand for housing across the country. As will be detailed in the coming pages, the unemployment rate is anticipated to rise over the coming year, which may result in a lower level of population growth. Based on the labour force data, 122,912 new jobs were created over the 12 months to July whilst net long-term overseas arrivals were recorded at 306,500 persons to June 2013. If job creation slows, employment prospects for those moving here from abroad will be lower which may result in lower levels of overseas migration.

A highly centralised nation (See G6)The population of Australia is highly centralised and largely concentrated in and around a few key centres, mostly along the eastern seaboard. As at June 2012, 65.5 per cent of Australians (slightly more than 15 million) lived within a capital city. Of this 65.5 per cent, 38.9 per cent lived in either Sydney or Melbourne with 56.8 per cent of Australians located in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane or Perth. One in five Australians live within the Greater Sydney region.

The fact that so many Australians live in a handful of capital cities creates significant housing demand within these regions. The further challenge is that housing is much more expensive as you move closer to the city centre as the more affordable areas on the outskirts of the city often have limited provision of much needed transport infrastructure and facilities. This goes some way to explaining why home values in Australia appear high on an international basis.

Private sector appetite for credit is at low levels on an historic basis (See G7)Private sector credit (including securitisations) has increased by 3.1 per cent over the 12 months to June 2013. The result is made up

of a 4.6 per cent increase in housing credit, a 0.2 per cent increase in other personal credit and a 0.9 per cent increase in business credit. As the chart highlights, credit growth is at an anaemic level. At June 2012, overall credit had grown by 4.4 per cent over the year.

The RBA has been tracking the annual growth in private sector credit since September 1977. Between then and June 2013 private sector credit has increased at an average annual rate of 11.9 per cent. Given this you can appreciate just how low consumer appetite for credit is.

The slowdown in the demand for credit is a response to the financial crisis and the higher levels of global economic volatility. Growth in private sector credit has been much slower since mid 2008, and looks set to remain at low levels for as long as consumers, and to a lesser extent, businesses are more focussed on reducing leverage.

The annual growth in private sector credit has been consistently below 5.0 per cent since March 2009, highlighting the extent of the ongoing slowdown and the reluctance by the private sector to take on additional debt.

G6: Estimated population by capital city as at June 2012

Capital city State PopulationPer cent of capital city population

Per cent of total population

Sydney NSW 4,667,283 31.1% 20.4%Melbourne VIC 4,246,345 28.3% 18.5%Brisbane QLD 2,189,878 14.6% 9.6%Adelaide SA 1,277,174 8.5% 5.6%Perth WA 1,897,548 12.6% 8.3%Hobart TAS 216,959 1.4% 0.9%Darwin NT 131,678 0.9% 0.6%Canberra ACT 374,658 2.5% 1.6%

Combined capital cities 15,001,523 65.5%Source: RP Data, ABS

Key StatisticsAustralia’s population increased by 394,233 persons throughout the 2012 calendar year, up from 339,650 persons over the 2011 calendar year. Australia’s total population increased by 1.8 per cent over the year which was in-line with the average annual increase over the past five years.


8

Key StatisticsPrivate sector housing credit increased by just 4.6 per cent over the 12 months to June 2013 and is at near record low levels. Between August 1977 to June 2013, housing credit has grown at an average annual rate of 13.5 per cent. At the same time 12 months ago, housing credit had grown by 5.0 per cent over the year.

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

Source: RP Data, RBA

G8: Annual growth in private sector housing creditJun-78 to Jun-13

Jun-78 Jun-83 Jun-88 Jun-93 Jun-98 Jun-03 Jun-08 Jun-13

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

-5%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

-5%


G7: Annual growth in private sector creditJun-78 to Jun-13


Demand for housing credit by the private sector at near record low levels (See G8)Over the 12 months to June 2013, private sector housing credit has increased by just 4.6 per cent. Over recent months there has been a slight increase in housing credit growth, however, it remains at an extremely low level. The data series for private sector housing credit extends back to August 1977. Between then and June 2013, credit has grown at an average annual rate of 13.5 per cent. At the same time 12 months ago, housing credit had grown by 5.0 per cent over the year.

The data further breaks the housing credit aggregates into owner occupier and investor housing credit. Owner occupier housing credit has increased by 4.1 per cent over the 12 months to June 2013, compared to a 4.9 per cent increase over the year to June 2012. Investor housing credit has risen by 5.7 per cent over the past year compared to a more moderate 5.3 per cent annual increase to June 2012. Growth in housing credit has been trending lower ever since February 2004, which was the peak of the Sydney housing market. This time period also marked the end

of the 2001 to 2003 housing boom. It was also around this time that households started to increase their rate of savings. The household savings ratio increased dramatically in late 2008 and has been at an elevated level ever since. The record low level of growth in private sector housing credit is reflective of both lower demand for new housing loans and the fact that home owners are paying off their home loans at a more rapid pace.

Households remain highly indebted (See G9)As at March 2013, the typical Australian household had a level of debt which was 147.3 per cent higher than their disposable income. Although that figure remains at a very high level, the debt level has been at a similar level now since the end of 2005 as detailed in the G9 chart. It is also important to note that housing accounts for 90.5 per cent of the outstanding debt to households. This highlights that housing is the single largest asset purchase that most Australians will ever make. Unlike many other countries, the level of debt hasn’t decreased over recent years, however, it has seemingly reached a plateau.

The RBA recently published detailed research on the slow rate of credit growth by the private sector and the level of household debt in their March 2013 Financial Stability Review. They noted “that a contributing factor to the slower pace of credit growth is the fact that households have been taking advantage of the lower interest rate environment to pay down their debt faster. Mortgage buffers (balances in mortgage offset and redraw facilities) are now estimated to be equivalent to around 14 per cent of the outstanding stock of housing loans. When interest rates fall, not all borrowers reduce their mortgage payments, resulting in an increase in prepayment rates. The increase in the rate of prepayments as a result of the decline in mortgage lending rates since late 2011 is estimated to have reduced the growth rate of housing credit by around 0.5 percentage points over 2012. Measured a different way, in aggregate, households’ mortgage buffers are equivalent to around 20 months of scheduled repayments (principal plus interest) at current interest rates. This provides considerable scope for many borrowers to continue to meet their loan repayments even during a temporary spell of unemployment or reduced income.”

Falling mortgage rates are powering the current housing market recovery (See G10)Official interest rates, as set by the RBA, started on a loosening bias in November 2011 when the official cash rate was cut by 25 basis points. Since that time the cash rate has fallen by 225 basis points to 2.5 per cent, its lowest level in


9

Key StatisticsWith mortgage rates at such low levels, the housing market is clearly responding to the low interest rate charges on mortgage debt. The RBA still has the scope to cut rates further.

14%

12%

10%

8%

6%

4%

14%

12%

10%

8%

6%

4%


G10: Typical home loan lending rates across AustraliaAug-91 to Aug-13

Standard variable mortgage rate Discounted variable mortgage rate 3 yr �xed rate

Aug-91 Aug-93 Aug-95 Aug-97 Aug-99 Aug-01 Aug-03 Aug-05 Aug-07 Aug-09 Aug-11 Aug-13

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20


G9: Household debt to disposable incomeMar-77 to Mar-13160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

Mar-77 Mar-81 Mar-85 Mar-01 Mar-97 Mar-93Mar-89 Mar-05 Mar-09 Mar-13

more than 50 years. To August 2013, standard variable mortgage rates have fallen by approximately 185 basis points over that time, from 7.8 per cent to 5.95 per cent. In reality, most mortgagees receive the discounted variable mortgage rate which currently sits at 5.1 per cent. The average three year fixed mortgage rate is currently 4.9 per cent.

With mortgage rates at such low levels, the housing market is clearly responding to the low interest charges on mortgage debt. The RBA still has scope to cut rates further should the need arise. The likelihood of further interest rate cuts seems fairly high given that Federal Treasury is now forecasting that economic growth will slow to 2.5 per cent this year and the unemployment rate will peak at 6.25 per cent. Of course, the challenge will be once interest rates inevitably move higher, will mortgagees be able to continue to repay their loans and what impact will interest rate rises have on home values? The predominance of variable or ‘floating’ rate mortgages in Australia means that changes to official interest rates quickly flow through to the budgets and spending patterns of those with a mortgage.

Low returns in lower risk asset classes are driving investors into the housing market (See G11)Investor activity in the Australian housing market has been extremely strong over the past year. When you look at the returns currently available on relatively risk-free asset classes such as bank deposits and government bonds you can understand why investors are targeting other asset classes such as property. At the end of July 2013, the overnight cash rate was recorded at 2.75 per cent, one year term deposits had an interest rate of 3.7 per cent and five and 10 year Australian Government Bonds were returning 3.09 per cent and 3.75 per cent respectively. The returns for low risk investment classes have severely reduced due the fact that there is stronger demand for risk free investment.

The reduced return in risk-free asset classes was recently noted in a speech by the Reserve Bank Governor Glenn Stevens. “Absolute borrowing costs for most borrowers are very low despite higher spreads, because the return on one of the least risky assets – the cash rate – is the lowest for 50 years or more. The market yields on government securities, the lowest risk assets of all, have likewise been very low. In other words, with many investors wanting safety, the price of safety has risen. It has to rise by enough to prompt at least some people to start to shift their portfolios in the direction of taking some more risk – by holding equities, physical assets and so on, though obviously we don’t want too much risk-taking. One of the things we have been watching for as

we have been reducing interest rates has been an indication of savers shifting portfolios towards some of the slightly more risky asset classes, as that is one of the expected and intended effects of monetary policy easing. There are clearly signs of policy working in this respect, though not, to date, by so much that we see a serious impediment to further easing, were that to be appropriate from an overall macroeconomic point of view.”

When you consider 4.9 per cent growth in capital city home values over the past year accompanied by a 4.2 per cent gross rental yield on a typical investment property, it is no surprise that investor interest in the housing market is currently so strong.

Consumer sentiment has been trending higher over the past year (See G12)The monthly survey of consumer sentiment undertaken by Westpac and the Melbourne Institute shows that Australian consumers are currently more optimistic than pessimistic about economic conditions. The Index measures views on the financial situation of Australian households over the past


10

Key StatisticsOver the 12 months to June 2013, there was $259.646 billion spent on retail across Australia. The total value of retail trade was 2.9 per cent higher over the 2012/13 financial year than for the 2011/2012 financial year.

130

120

110

100

90

80

70

60

130

120

110

100

90

80

70

60

Source: RP Data, Westpac-Melbourne InstituteConsumer sentiment 12 mth average

G12: Australian consumer sentimentAug-77 to Aug-13

Aug-77 Aug-83 Aug-89 Aug-95 Aug-01 Aug-07 Aug-13

12%

10%

8%

6%

4%

2%

12%

10%

8%

6%

4%

2%


G11: Returns on selected low-risk asset classes Jul-91 to Jul-13

1 yr term deposits Overnight cash rate 5 yr bonds 10 yr bonds

Jul-91 Jul-93 Jul-95 Jul-97 Jul-99 Jul-01 Jul-03 Jul-05 Jul-07 Jul-09 Jul-11 Jul-13

and coming year, anticipated economic conditions over the coming year and five years, as well as buying conditions for major household items. When the Index is above 100 points, consumers are more optimistic than pessimistic, and when below 100 points pessimism outweighs optimism.

The Consumer Sentiment Index has been above 100 points for nine of the past 12 months. While the month-to-month movement shows some volatility, the 12 month rolling average has remained above the 100 mark over the past 12 months. The result suggests that consumers are slowly responding to the low mortgage rate environment.

If we look at the components of the index on a 12 month average basis, we also see ongoing improvements. Most encouraging is that the index of family finances over the next 12 months has trended higher since July of last year, with optimism outweighing pessimism over the past three months. If consumers are confident that the next year is going to be better, they are likely to show a greater propensity to spend which should translate good news for the retail and housing sector.

The Index also regularly tracks where consumers believe to be the best place for savings. Over the June 2013 quarter, 34.0 per cent of respondents felt bank deposits were the wisest place for savings. If this figure is extended to all financial institutions (building societies and credit unions) it rises to 37.1 per cent. Real estate showed the second highest response, with 24.6 per cent of respondents believing that was the best savings vehicle. Interestingly, just 8.4 per cent of respondents felt that shares were the wisest place for savings. These figures highlight the significant change in consumer attitudes by Australians over recent years, away from spending and higher risk investments to increased savings and repaying debt.

It is interesting to note that the percentage of respondents nominating real estate as the best place for savings rose from 21.3 per cent in March 2013 to 24.6 per cent in June. With lower interest rates resulting in lower returns on savings, some are now looking to other investment vehicles in which to invest such as real estate, particularly given the rental yields available and the capital gains that are starting to crystalize.

Retail trade fails to fire as consumer conservatism reigns supreme (See G13)Over the 12 months to June 2013, there was $259.646 billion spent on retail across Australia. The total value of retail trade was 2.9 per cent higher over the 2012/13 financial year than the 2011/12 financial year. As the chart shows, growth in retail trade has been quite low over the year, reflective of the slow credit growth and general caution which is being shown by consumers. It is also important to note that this series does not measure purchases made from overseas or on-line, only those in Australian stores.

There have been much sharper rises on an annual basis across several retail sectors. Cafes, restaurants and take-away food services (4.7 per cent) and food retailing (4.4 per cent) each recorded much higher increases over the financial year. On the other hand, trade has increased at much more moderate rates over the year for household goods (1.2 per cent), clothing, footwear and personal accessories (2.3 per cent), department stores (0.3 per cent) and other retailing (0.8 per cent). As mentioned, the data does not include purchases from overseas, however, the categories of retail which fell over the year or grew modestly are the types of items which can be purchased from overseas and often at prices much cheaper than those available in Australia. On the other hand, the data indicates Australians are spending much more on food purchased for consumption both inside and outside of the home.


11

Key StatisticsThe national unemployment rate was recorded at 5.8 per cent in August 2013, at its highest level since August 2009. Over the past year, the unemployment rate has slowly trended higher from 5.2 per cent in July 2012.

30%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

30%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

Source: RP Data, ABSProportion of �xed rate home loans Rolling 12 mth average

G14: Proportion of home loans on a fixed rate mortgageJun-93 to Jun-13

Jun-93 Jun-97 Jun-01 Jun-05 Jun-09 Jun-13

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%

-1%

-2%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%

-1%

-2%

Source: RP Data, ABSMonthly change Rolling 12 mth average change

G13: Change in Australian retail tradeJun-03 to Jun-13


Loan types – Australians overwhelmingly prefer variable mortgage rate loans (See G14)Historically, Australians have favoured a variable or ‘floating’ rate mortgage rather than a fixed rate (note that fixed rate loans are typically three to five years in duration). Housing finance data for June 2013 shows that over the month, 17.8 per cent of owner occupier loans written were on a fixed rate mortgage. Over the past 12 months, an average of 14.8 per cent of home loans written each month were on a fixed rate. The result highlights that Australian’s overwhelmingly prefer a variable rate loan as opposed to the short-term security of a fixed rate loan.

The fact that most Australian home loans are on a variable rate has proven to be a positive outcome for policy makers over recent years. Due to the popularity of variable mortgages, changes to monetary policy have an almost immediate impact on household balance sheets and consumer behaviour. In turn, this assists the RBA when it makes monetary policy adjustments as they directly and quickly filter through to most households. It is interesting to note that fixed rate loans are currently available at a lower interest rate than variable loans which potentially means the popularity of fixed rate mortgages will continue to grow over the coming months.

The unemployment rate was at its highest level in almost four years in June and July 2013 (See G15)The national unemployment rate was recorded at 5.7 per cent in July 2013, at its highest level since August 2009. Over the past year, the unemployment rate has slowly trended higher from 5.2 per cent in July 2012. The number of employed persons has increased by 122,912 persons over the past 12 months which is the equivalent of just 10,243 persons a month. Breaking the data down further, 37,657 additional full time jobs have been created and 85,254 part-time roles have been created over this period. The data indicates that almost 70 per cent of new jobs created over the year have been part-time. Recently released figures by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) showed that employment underutilisation was most recently recorded at 12.9 per cent, highlighting that many employees would like to be working more hours than they currently do. The proportion of the working age population, either employed or actively looking for work, was recorded at 65.1 per cent as at July 2013. Over the past year, the size of the labour force has expanded by 1.6 per cent to 12.35 million persons, however, the number of persons unemployed that are actively looking for work has increased by 10.8 per cent to 705,000 persons.

The ABS also releases a quarterly analysis of job vacancies across the country. The latest analysis which focusses on the three months to May 2013 found that there were 138,900 job vacancies across Australia, which was the fewest since the three months to November 2005 and 28 per cent lower than its most recent peak in November 2010. Job vacancies have been trending lower over recent years as the unemployment rate has been increasing. Given this factor it is reasonable to expect further increases to the unemployment rate over the coming months. As already mentioned, Federal Treasury is forecasting that the unemployment rate will peak at 6.25 per cent during 2013.

First home buyer activity has increased from recent lows but remains at below average levels (See G16)In June 2013, there were 7,331 housing finance commitments to first home buyers which is slightly lower than the 12 month average of 7,546 commitments. Over the past 12 months, there were 90,551 commitments by first home buyers which is 8.9 per cent lower than over


12

Key StatisticsOver the past 12 months, there were 90,551 housing finance commitments by first home buyers which is 8.9 per cent lower that over the same 12 month period in 2012. First home buyer commitments have accounted for 16.2 per cent of all owner occupier finance commitments over the last 12 months.

20,000

16,000

12,000

8,000

4,000

20,000

16,000

12,000

8,000

4,000


G16: National number of first home buyer finance commitmentsJun-93 to Jun-13

First home buyer �nance commitments Rolling 12 mth change


12%

10%

8%

6%

4%

2%

12%

10%

8%

6%

4%

2%


G15: National unemployment rate Jul-80 to Jul-13

Unemployment rate Rolling 12 mth average

Jul-80 Jul-83 Jul-86 Jul-89 Jul-92 Jul-95 Jul-98 Jul-01 Jul-04 Jul-07 Jul-10 Jul-13

the same 12 month period in 2012. First home buyer finance commitments have accounted for 16.2 per cent of all owner occupier finance commitments over the last 12 months.

As the chart shows, first home buyer finance commitments have begun to increase over recent months, off a very low base. First home buyer housing finance commitments reached a recent peak in activity back in 2009 when more than 18,000 commitments were being made a month. At that time, the federal government had introduced additional incentives for first home buyers, over and above the First Home Buyers Grant. These incentives, coupled with the lowest mortgage rates in more than a generation, resulted in a surge of first home buyers entering the market. Since that time the number of first home buyer finance commitments have been much lower due to the pull forward of demand brought about by these favourable conditions.

Interestingly, the first home owners grant is now being offered exclusively for new homes only (first home buyers purchasing an established home are no longer eligible to receive the Grant) in New South Wales, Queensland and Victoria, Australia’s three

largest states. The policy objective is that focussing this incentive on new homes will encourage a higher level of demand for new dwellings and consequently drive a higher level of housing construction. The change didn’t come into effect in Victoria until July 1 2013. However, in New South Wales and Queensland, activity by first home buyers has recently slumped to record lows following these changes. The challenge is that new homes are typically available in outer areas of the city that are less desirable to first home buyers and new stock is often more expensive than pre-existing stock in these areas. Despite the incentives, the higher cost acts as a disincentive to purchase.

Owner occupier finance commitments improving, largely driven by new loans rather than refinances (See G17)In June 2013, there were 34,461 owner occupier finance commitments for new loans compared to 16,541 commitments for refinance purposes. There have been 379,517 owner occupier finance commitments for new loans over the 12 months to June 2013, compared to 182,489 refinance commitments. On an annual basis, the number of new loan commitments are 7.1 per cent higher while refinance commitments have fallen by 2.6 per cent. The lower levels of refinancing over the year is a little surprising given that mortgage rates have been trending much lower and many financial institutions are offering competitive home loan rates.

The data is further split into three categories which include both new loans and refinances: loans for new construction, loans for the purchase of new dwellings and loans for the purchase of established dwellings. Over the past year the number of loans for new construction has increased by 5.3 per cent, loans for purchase of new dwellings have risen by 30.9 per cent and loans for purchase of existing dwellings have risen by 2.1 per cent. Finance commitments for new construction and new purchase have risen at a much greater rate than commitments for existing homes over the year. Although both construction of new homes and purchase of new homes have recorded significant increases over the year, finance commitments for the purchase of established dwellings accounted for 83.5 per cent of all commitments throughout the year.

Investment activity has improved markedly over the year (See G18)There was $8.3 billion worth of finance commitments for investment purposes in June 2013, which was 18.3 per cent higher than in June 2012. Based on commitments over the 12 months to June 2013, investment finance


13

commitments were 15.3 per cent higher over the year.

The total value of investment finance commitments has clearly risen significantly over the past year. In fact, investment activity is now at its highest level since it peaked in June 2007. Investment activity is so strong at the moment because the returns on less risky assets are comparatively low, hence many investors are seeking a higher level of return. In Australia, housing is typically viewed as relatively low risk and when you factor in capital growth and rental yields, the return on residential property is currently quite attractive.

Dwelling approvals trending higher over the year off a very low base (See G19)There were 93,554 houses and 64,096 units approved for construction nationally over the 2012/13 financial year. As the chart shows, approvals have trended higher over the year with the annual number of house approvals up 2.7 per cent and unit approvals rising by 9.1 per cent. Although dwelling approvals are trending higher it is off a very low base with dwelling approvals now sitting right at the 20 year average. The data splits out dwelling approvals to those by the public and the private sector. Over the past 12 months, the public sector received just 3,436 dwelling approvals which represent 2.2 per cent of all approvals. Historically, approvals to the private sector have shown an overwhelming majority.

Over the year, 40.7 per cent of new dwelling approvals were for units as opposed to 59.3 per cent for houses. Although detached houses remain the dominant dwelling type, the 40.7 per cent of units approved over the year is an almost record high proportion of unit approvals. Not only are units more affordable than detached houses, they are also largely being delivered into inner city areas and along strategically located transport spines where a large proportion of the population prefers to live. There has been a strong trend towards a greater proportion of unit approvals over recent years and we believe affordability factors will result in a continuation of this trend over coming years.

$billion

8

6

4

2

0

$billion

8

6

4

2

0


G18: Monthly value of finance commitments for investment purposes Jun-93 to Jun-13


50,000

40,000

30,000

20,000

10,000

0

50,000

40,000

30,000

20,000

10,000

0


G17: National number of owner occupier refinance vs. non-refiannce commitmentsJun-93 to Jun-13

Re�nances New loans


14,000

12,000

10,000

8,000

6,000

4,000

2,000

14,000

12,000

10,000

8,000

6,000

4,000

2,000

Source: RP Data, RBAUnit approvals Unit 12 mth average

G19: National house and unit approvalsJun-85 to Jun-13

House approvals House 12 mth average


14

Commentary | RP Data Property Capital Markets Report, Spring 2013

Lessons from New ZealandWhat can be learnt from New Zealand policy makers and their efforts to put the brakes on that country’s housing market?

This article explores the recent decision by the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) to impose macro-prudential policy on the New Zealand residential policy mortgage lending market in order to help slow the rate of housing related credit growth and house price inflation in New Zealand.

It explores the rationale for the potential application of such a policy in Australia and explains why the author believes such a policy is unlikely to be introduced in the near to medium term.

What did the RBNZ do and why did they do it?On 20 August 2013, the Governor of RBNZ, Mr Graeme Wheeler, announced a new macro-prudential tool in order to limit the rate of housing-related credit growth and house price inflation in that market. RBNZ noted that house prices increased by 16 per cent and 10 per cent respectively in Auckland and Christchurch over the 12 months.

Given this strong rate of growth, RBNZ’s view that house prices in New Zealand were already high by international standards and the extent of household leverage in that market (household debt at 145 per cent of household income), RBNZ felt the need to impose a new macro-prudential instrument in order to seek to limit the rate of future home price appreciation and therefore mitigate the risk of a material correction in home values in the New Zealand market.

Prior to the implementation of this macro-prudential instrument, approximately 30 precent of all new lending activity by New Zealand banks had a loan to value ratio (LVR) 80 per cent or higher. The macro-prudential instrument announced by RBNZ, with effect from 1 October 2013, places a “speed limit” on the amount of high LVR lending (over 80 per cent LVR) a financial institution is able to undertake.

In summary, New Zealand banks will be required to restrict high LVR to no more than 10 per cent of the dollar value of their new housing lending loans until further notice. After taking into account certain exemptions,

the impact of this new rule will mean that New Zealand banks will effectively need to halve their high LVR lending from current levels. This is expected to have a material impact on lending volumes and the availability of mortgage finance in the New Zealand market in the short to medium term.

Is it likely that such a macro-prudential instrument will be introduced in Australia in the near to medium term?In the author’s opinion, the answer is no.The first point to make is that Australia hasn’t seen nearly the level of home price appreciation that New Zealand has experienced over the past 12 months.

Whilst it is fair to say that current housing market conditions in Australia, particularly lead by markets such as Sydney and Melbourne, are particularly strong, the point remains that capital city home values still remain approximately 1 per cent below their peak, having recovered 7 per cent since their trough. Markets such as Brisbane in particular remain nearly 10 per cent below their previous peak.

Whilst capital city home values have increased by around 4 per cent over the past three months (a rate at which policy makers would feel uncomfortable with were it to continue at that pace over a 6 to 12 month period), the Australian housing market has not seen the rapid level of home price appreciation witnessed in parts of the Auckland market over the past 12 to 18 months.

Further, the more modest 0.5 per cent gain in home values over the month of August is a more sustainable rate of growth and will be a welcome turn of events for policy makers. It is important to remember that the average annual capital gain over the past decade has been just 4.3 per cent across the combined capital cities. In Sydney the annual rate of growth has been a much lower level of 2.4 per cent.

Also, the rate of home value growth seen across the capital cities in recent months is

Craig MacKenzie, Head of Corporate Affairs and General Counsel, RP Data

15

RP Data Property Capital Markets Report, Spring 2013 | Commentary

not evenly shared. The softer housing market conditions during August can be attributed mostly to a lower rate of growth across the Sydney and Melbourne housing markets, where dwelling values rose by 0.6 per cent and 0.2 per cent respectively. Several cities recorded a fall in values over the month, with Hobart seeing the largest decline with a 1.2 per cent fall and Perth values slipping by 0.2 per cent.

Accordingly, it is argued that the problem that RBNZ is seeking to solve in New Zealand is not currently present in the Australian housing market.

Second, other similarities and differences between the Australian and New Zealand housing and mortgage markets need to be understood and explored.

One of the key similarities is that, like in New Zealand, approximately 30 per cent of all new lending in Australia is for LVRs over 80 per cent. A recent report issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) on property exposures by Approved Deposit-taking Institutions (ADIs) noted that 32 per cent of new residential lending in the June 2013 calendar quarter was for LVRs of 80 per cent or above.

The level of high LVR lending in Australia has typically varied between 20 and 30 per cent over the past decade, mainly driven by first home buyer and investor activity (both of which typically fall in the high LVR category).

At present first home buyers are largely sitting on the side lines, impacted by affordability constraints. In contrast, in Australia investors are very active in the market, and to a lesser degree, owner occupiers seeking to upgrade their property.

Notwithstanding the similarities in the current levels of high LVR lending activity in Australia and New Zealand, this does not mean that there is a material proportion of reckless or irresponsible lending taking place in the Australian market. In particular, a key difference between the Australian and New Zealand mortgage markets is the widespread presence of lenders mortgage insurance (LMI) in Australia. LMI companies have a strong financial incentive to ensure that credit standards are maintained with respect to high LVR lending, as the risk is completely transferred by the lending institution to the LMI provider.

LMI companies do not currently operate in New Zealand, with the lending institutions in that market maintaining the credit risk associated with high LVR loans on their balance sheets, having typically received a “low equity premium” from the borrower when applying for the loan.

Their presence and market influence

in Australia serves as a very useful vehicle through which to monitor and influence the extent and quality of high LVR lending in Australia.

Third, there are several adverse and potentially unintended consequences likely to flow as a consequence of any regulatory intervention to limit high LVR lending in Australia.

Policies such as this undoubtedly have an adverse impact on first home buyers by effectively limiting the supply of available finance. This is a very unpopular political message to deliver and arguably against the Australian ethos of promoting (responsible) home ownership.

What else can APRA and the Reserve Bank of Australia do to put some breaks on an overly heated housing market?

1. Diligent SupervisionThis is the main weapon in APRA’s armoury. APRA closely supervises its regulated institutions to monitor the quality and composition of new mortgage originations so as to ensure that each regulated institution is not growing materially over and above system credit growth, either overall or in a particular geographic market or sub market.

If APRA were to form the view that a regulated institution was writing too much high LVR business or otherwise poor credit quality business, APRA would have no hesitation in ‘reigning in the horns’ of that institution.

This diligence and supervision, combined with repeated commentary by both APRA and the Reserve Bank of Australia that regulated institutions should not seek to counter balance weak credit growth with a loosening of credit standards, means that this ‘weapon’ will be the main vehicle through which APRA ensures that prudent lending activity continues to occur and does not, of itself, act as an instrument which contributes to an overheated Australian housing market.

2. Increase capital on high loan to value ratio loansPrior to the introduction of the macro-prudential instrument in New Zealand, RBNZ increased capital on high LVR loans written by New Zealand regulated institutions.Whilst APRA would have closely followed this initiative, APRA is unlikely to adopt such an approach in Australia as APRA already follows a relatively conservative approach to the capital treatment of high LVR loans, with the introduction of a minimum 20 per cent LGD floor for internally rated institutions (the

international floor is 10 per cent). That is, the large banks would argue that

APRA’s conservative approach is requiring them to hold more capital than is necessary in respect of their respective residential mortgage portfolios, and in particular their high LVR loans in that book.

3. Product RestrictionsAPRA was a pioneer in defining a high quality residential mortgage. In 2008 it introduced the definitions of a standard and non-standard mortgage, with non-standard mortgages requiring more capital to be held.

It is important to note that the definition of standard mortgage and non-standard mortgages are not dependant on LVR. Currently, the only effective type of non-standard loans being written in the Australian market is a small number of low doc loans by regulated financial institutions.

However, were APRA to consider that a certain type of mortgage lending activity was leading to either a weakening of credit standards or credit induced home price appreciation beyond that felt comfortable, APRA could follow the lead of other global banking regulators and seek to re-define the definition of a standard mortgage.

For example, in the Unites States regulators are currently implementing rules associated with qualified mortgages (QM) and qualified residential mortgages (QRM) which will influence lender’s risk appetite to originate mortgages that fall outside of these definitions.

For example, interest only loans and loans with a debt to income servicing ratios above 43 per cent are unable to qualify as QM loans. Similarly, in Canada the regulator (OSFI) has introduced rules which limit loan terms beyond 35 years from being originated in that market, and are currently considering lowering this to 25 years. OSFI has also placed LVR caps on loans for refinance purposes.

This is a possible approach APRA may take down the track, if they consider that a certain type of lending product is leading to outcomes which they consider undesirable.

ConclusionFor the reasons set out above, neither the Reserve Bank of Australia nor APRA is likely to introduce macro-prudential instruments along the lines of RBNZ in the near term. However, with interest rates at historically low levels and capital city home values increasing by 4 per cent over the past three months, both institutions will have a keen eye on ensuring strong credit standards are maintained and that the rate of home price appreciation does not become unsustainable.

Housing market overview | RP Data Property Capital Markets Report, Spring 2013

16

Housing market overviewSales transactions and home values are generally increasing but prudence remains the watch word for Australian households.

The residential housing market is Australia’s single largest and most valuable asset class with a total estimated value of $4.89 trillion as at June 2013. In comparison, the total value of listed Australian equities is almost three and a half times smaller at $1.4 trillion.

The national gross domestic product over the year to March 2013 was $1.48 trillion indicating that the value of housing assets is 3.3 times larger than the economy’s annual output. With such a large proportion of Australian wealth allocated to residential housing, providing timely, complete and accurate measurements about the performance of Australia’s largest asset class is essential. This is why RP Data, together with Rismark International, developed the suite of Hedonic Indices that have become the benchmark in understanding how dwelling values have changed across Australia’s housing markets. It also highlights why the stability of the housing market is so important to the overall wellbeing of the Australian economy.

Over the 12 months to June 2013, home values across the eight capital cities of Australia, which account for 65.5 per cent of the national population, have increased by 3.8 per cent. In contrast, over the 12 months to June 2012, combined capital city home values had fallen by 3.6 per cent indicating a sharp reversal of the housing market’s performance over the past year. Over the first six months of 2013, home values have increased by 3.0 per cent indicating that much of the annual value growth has occurred during 2013. Capital city home values have now been recording moderate rises over the past 12 months however, they remain 2.9 per cent lower than they were at their October 2010 peak.

Most encouraging is the fact that the rise in home values is being accompanied by a rise in transactions. Over the three months to May 2013, capital city house and unit sales were 19.3 per cent higher than over the same

period a year ago. The fact that values are rising in line with transactions suggests that the current increase in values is likely to be more sustainable.

Although the number of sales transactions and home values are generally increasing, Australian households are continuing to act in a prudent nature, saving around 10 per cent of their disposable income. There also has not been any substantial increase in housing credit growth, with it continuing to increase but at near record low levels.

Despite the fact that the economy continues to grow and home values and transaction numbers are now increasing, there have been ongoing reductions to interest rates over recent years by the Reserve Bank. Official interest rates have been trending lower since November 2011 falling by 225 basis points since that time. As at August 2013, the official cash rate was recorded at 2.5 per cent, its lowest level in more than 50 years.

Adjustments to interest rates and the subsequent changes to mortgage rates generally have an almost immediate impact on consumers. Not only do interest rate changes affect the interest received on their cash at bank, the prominence of variable or ‘floating’ mortgage rates means that changes to interest rates are passed directly on to anyone with money in the bank as well as the vast majority of mortgagees. Subsequently, changes to the cost of debt have a significant and immediate impact on consumer sentiment and their spending patterns.

Although dwelling values are broadly climbing across the capital city housing markets, as always there are variations in the rate of growth on a city-to-city basis. The gains being recorded across the combined capital city Index are mainly being driven by a 6.0 per cent annual value increase in Perth and a 5.6 per cent annual increase in Sydney. Values have also risen by 6.1 per cent in Darwin but the

Over the 12 months to June 2013, home values across the eight capital cities of Australia, which account for 65.5 per cent of the national population, have increased by 3.8 per cent. In contrast, over the 12 months to June 2012, combined capital city home values had fallen by 3.6 per cent indicating a sharp reversal of the housing market’s performance over the past year.

RP Data Property Capital Markets Report, Spring 2013 | Housing market overview

17

Key StatisticsAlong with the broad rise in home values, there has been a marked improvement in other lead indicators. The number of properties available for sale has fallen and is now lower than at the same time last year. Auction clearance rates are noticeably higher than they have been in a number of years. Vendor discounting has also reduced and homes are selling faster than they were a year ago.

8%

6%

4%

2%

0%

-2%

8%

6%

4%

2%

0%

-2%

G2: Capital city performanceAnnual change in dwelling values – year ending June 2013

Source: RP Data, RP Data - Rismark Home Value Index

Perth Darwin Sydney MelbourneCanberra Brisbane Adelaide Hobart Australiancapitals

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

-5%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

-5%


G1: Rolling quarterly and annual change in Sydney home values

Source: RP Data, RP Data - Rismark Home Value IndexJu

n-97

Jun-

99

Jun-

01

Jun-

03

Jun-

05

Jun-

07

Jun-

09

Jun-

11

Jun-

13

small size of the city means it has a relatively insignificant impact on the combined capital city figure. Elsewhere, annual value growth has been recorded at 3.4 per cent in Melbourne, 0.6 per cent in Brisbane, 0.2 per cent in Adelaide and 1.1 per cent in Canberra whilst values have fallen by 1.8 per cent over the year in Australia’s southernmost capital city, Hobart. Broadly speaking, the increase in home values over the year has been driven by the lower valued stock in the market as opposed to the prestige housing markets.

Along with the broad rise in home values there has been a marked improvement in other lead indicators. The number of properties available for sale has fallen and is now lower than at the same time last year. Auction clearance rates are noticeably higher than they have been in a number of years. The amount of discounting by vendors has also reduced and homes are selling faster than they were a year ago. All of these signs suggest that home values are likely to continue to trend higher over the coming months.

The unemployment rate is forecast to rise to as high as 6.25 per cent over the 2013/14 financial year and economic growth is expected to be below trend at 2.5 per cent.

Although these softening indicators may provide some headwinds for the housing market, an unemployment rate of 6.25 per cent is still quite low and the last time unemployment was that high (September 2002) capital city home values were increasing at an annualised rate of 18.2 per cent. Australia’s economic future is of course not certain, but forecasts indicate slowing economic growth on the back of a slowdown in mining investment.

The RBA has stated that they would like to see an improvement in dwelling investment as the mining sector slows, however, the transition is unlikely to be smooth. Nevertheless, the economy is forecast to continue to grow and unemployment is forecast to remain relatively low, albeit much higher than those levels we have become accustomed to over recent years.

Over the next six months we anticipate that housing market conditions will continue to improve and we expect that the current value and volume increases may gather pace as cities which have lagged in their recovery potentially begin to experience improved market conditions. On the other hand, those markets more heavily exposed to the mining and resources sector may see weakening conditions over the coming six months as housing demand falls and economic conditions taper.

Capital city home values increase throughout 2013 (See G1)According to the RP Data-Rismark Home

Value Index, combined capital city home values increased by 0.2 per cent over the second quarter of 2013.

The result indicates slower market conditions given that home values rose by 2.8 per cent over the first three months of 2013. However, the second quarter of the year is seasonally softer than the first quarter. Over the first six months of 2013, combined capital city home values have risen by 3.0 per cent and they are 3.8 per cent higher than they were in June 2012. The detached housing market has outperformed the unit market over the past year with values growing by 4.0 per cent and 2.4 per cent respectively.

Based on the median selling price of homes over the three months to June 2013, capital city units are $80,000 more affordable than houses.

Although capital city home values have increased by 3.8 per cent over the past year, they remain 2.9 per cent lower than their historic high levels (See G2)The annual rise in capital city home values has been broad-based with Hobart (down


18

Key StatisticsAlthough all sectors of the housing market are improving, the premium sector has lagged where over the 12 months to June 2013; the premium sector of capital city housing markets has been the weakest performer for capital gains.

1.8 per cent) the only capital city in which home values have fallen over the past year. Across the remaining capital cities, annual value growth has been recorded at 6.1 per cent in Darwin, 6.0 per cent in Perth, 5.6 per cent in Sydney, 3.4 per cent in Melbourne, 1.1 per cent in Canberra, 0.6 per cent in Brisbane and 0.2 per cent in Adelaide.

Although home values are rising across each city except for Hobart, they remain lower than they were at the time of their respective market peaks in all cities except for Sydney. Sydney home values are now 1.2 per cent higher than their previous market peak. On the other hand, dwelling values across the combined capital cities are 2.9 per cent lower than their October 2010 peak.

Across the other capital cities, the decline in values from their respective market peaks are recorded at 11.1 per cent in Darwin, 10.8 per cent in Brisbane, 10.6 per cent in Hobart, 6.6 per cent in Melbourne, 4.4 per cent in Adelaide, 2.1 per cent in Canberra and 1.6 per cent in Perth. Although home values are broadly improving across the capital city marketplaces, the housing market still has a way to go, outside of Sydney, before reaching

a technical recovery. It is also important to remember that these figures are not inflation adjusted; the decline in housing markets from their peak and the period at which the respective markets peaked varies quite dramatically once inflation is taken into consideration.

Although all sectors of the housing market are improving, the premium sector has lagged (See G3)Over the 12 months to June 2013, the premium sector of capital city housing markets has been the weakest performer for capital gains. RP Data and Rismark analyse the performance of the national housing market across different value segments using a stratified hedonic regression index which provides a measure of value changes across the most affordable 25 per cent of capital city suburbs, the broad middle 50 per cent of suburbs and the most expensive 25 per cent of capital city suburbs.

Each of these broad value based segments of the capital city housing market has recorded growth over the past 12 months. Home values across the broad middle market have increased by 4.1 per cent compared to a 4.0 per cent increase across the most affordable suburbs and a 3.0 per cent increase in the most expensive suburbs.

Dwelling values across the most affordable and the middle priced suburbs have recorded a rise in values of 4.5 per cent and the middle market has seen values rise by 5.0 per cent since their respective troughs. Since the most expensive suburbs reached their trough, values have increased by 4.4 per cent. Values across the most affordable suburbs were at an historic high level in June 2013 while values across the middle market were 0.4 per cent lower than their previous peak. Values across the most expensive suburbs are still 5.3 per cent lower than they were at their previous peak.

Overall, it is clear that the housing market is picking up across all sectors. Growth has initially been spurred across the more affordable sectors of the market and that is now starting to flow through to the more expensive sector of the market. We would not be surprised if the premium housing sector of the market records the strongest growth over the next six to twelve months.

The instances of homes selling at a loss has begun to ease (See G4)Over the three months to May 2013, 11.8 per cent of home sales were transacted at a gross loss (ie their sale price was lower than their previous purchase price). 12 months ago, 12.1 per cent of all homes sold over the three months period sold for less than their previous purchase price.

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0

-5%

-10%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0

-5%

-10%

G3: Annual change across market segments – Most affordable 25% vs. middle 50% vs. most expensive 25%

Middle 50% Most a�ordable 25% Most expensive 25% Source: RP Data, RP Data - Rismark Home Value Index

Jun-01 Jun-04 Jun-07 Jun-10 Jun-13

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

Source: RP DataProportion of homes sold for more than double purchase price Proportion of homes sold at a loss

G4: Proportion of homes sold at a loss vs. homes sold for more than double their previous purchase price

May-03 May-05 May-07 May-09 May-11 May-13


19

Key StatisticsBased on RP Data sales volumes estimates, there has been a noticeable increase in transactions during 2013. The increase in sales activity has occurred across both the house and unit markets and is indicative of a lower mortgage market environment at play.

60,000

50,000

40,000

30,000

20,000

10,000

0

60,000

50,000

40,000

30,000

20,000

10,000

0

Source: RP Data5 year average

G6: Monthly sales volumes – nationallyMay-93 to May-13

Units Houses

May-93 May-97 May-01 May-05 May-09 May-13

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

G5: National housing markets with the greatest proportion of homes sold at a lossThree months to May 2013

Source: RP Data

Mer

sey-

Lyel

l, Ta

s

Bris

bane

, Qld

Mid

-Nor

th C

oast

, NSW

Gre

ater

Hob

art,

Tas

Mac

kay,

Qld

Mur

ray,

NSW

York

e an

d Lo

wer

Nor

th, S

A

Mid

land

s, W

A

Sout

h W

est,

WA

Mal

lee,

Vic

Nor

ther

n, T

as

Wes

t Mor

eton

, Qld

Nor

ther

n, Q

ld

Rich

mon

d-Tw

eed,

NSW

Sout

h Ea

st, S

A

Low

er G

reat

Sou

ther

n, W

A

Wid

e Ba

y-Bu

rnet

t, Q

ld

Suns

hine

Coa

st, Q

ld

Far N

orth

, Qld

Gol

d Co

ast,

Qld

On a historic basis, the 11.8 per cent of loss making sales is a historically high proportion however, the figure has fallen from a recent peak of 13.1 per cent over the three months to January 2013. It should be noted that the 11.8 per cent of loss making sales over the most recent three months is the lowest proportion since the three months to January 2012.

Although the proportion of homes selling at a loss is declining, there is yet to be a bounce in the proportion of homes selling for more than double their previous purchase price. Over the three months to May 2013, 31.2 per cent of homes sold for more than double their previous purchase price; the lowest proportion since the three months to April 2003. Over the three months to May 2012, 33.2 per cent of all homes sold, sold for more than double the previous purchase price.

The results highlight that over recent years, the instances of sales at a loss has risen however, the vast majority of homes continue to be sold at a profit. In fact, 43.6 per cent of homes sold over the most recent quarter sold at a price that was more than 50 per cent higher than their initial purchase price.

Homes are much more likely to sell at a loss within coastal and ‘lifestyle’ housing markets (See G5)Although the proportion of homes selling at a loss is trending lower as home values once again start to rise, certain markets continue to have a large proportion of loss making sales. Those markets that are recording a high proportion of loss making sales are generally located in coastal housing markets which were extremely popular in the lead-up to the financial crisis.

Over recent years, the market performance in these regions has been hampered by much lower housing demand as ‘sea change’ migration has slowed and the tourism market has also eased. In many instances the value declines in these markets has been much more significant than the broader national benchmark.

Three of Queensland’s major coastal markets have had the largest proportion of homes selling at a loss over the three months to May 2013. On the Gold Coast, 36.2 per cent of all homes sold at a loss over the quarter followed by 35.4 per cent of sales in the Far North region and 31.1 per cent of homes on the Sunshine Coast. All three of these regions recorded strong appreciation in home values and a high rate of population growth in the lead-up to the financial crisis.

Since the on-set of the financial crisis, these markets have typically seen population growth rates fall. Tourism and investment has slowed and there has also been a subsequent decline in demand for housing. These markets

previously saw a large proportion of holiday home buyers. Demand for this type of asset has also fallen over recent years while many owners have looked to sell these non-core assets. It is important to note that no market is recording more than half of its stock selling at a loss and the vast majority of vendors, particularly those who have owned their home for longer than five years, continue to make a profit on the sale of their home.

The 20 regions listed in chart G5 have recorded 48 per cent of all loss making sales nationally over the three months to May 2013. Only two capital city markets; Hobart (17.8 per cent) and Brisbane (17.4 per cent) made the list. This highlights that housing market conditions have generally been stronger within the capital city markets than those in regional lifestyle driven housing markets.

Transaction volumes are generally starting to increase (See G6)RP Data’s estimate of sales volumes indicates there has been a noticeable increase in transactions during 2013. This increase in sales activity has occurred across both the house and unit market, indicating that the lower


20

Key StatisticsOver the past 12 months, 37.8 per cent of all home sales occurred at a price point between $200,000 and $400,000. Sales of homes at a price point below $600,000 accounted for 77.2 per cent of all national sales. Home sales above $1 million only accounted for 5.8 per cent of all transactions over the past year and only 1.0 per cent of sales were transacted for more than $2 million.

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

G8: Proportion of national home sales by price point 12 months to May 2008 vs. 12 months to May 2013

Source: RP Data2008 2013

Less than$200,000

$200,000 to$400,000

$400,000 to$600,000

$600,000 to$800,000

$800,000 to$1 million

$1 million to$2 million

$2 millionplus

10%

9%

8%

7%

6%

5%

10%

9%

8%

7%

6%

5%

Source: RP DataHouses Units

G7: Rolling annual average hold period of homes sold across AustraliaJun-99 to Jun-13


mortgage rate environment is encouraging a pick-up in market activity.

Over the three months to May 2013, there were 90,274 house sales and 33,394 unit sales across the country. In comparison to sales transactions over the same three month period in 2013, sales volumes are currently 18.9 per cent higher for houses and 14.7 per cent higher for units.

Across the combined capital cities over the three months, there were 56,892 house sales (63 per cent of all house sales) and 25,494 unit sales (76 per cent of all unit sales). As the G6 chart shows, house sales were 21.1 per cent higher than over the corresponding three months in 2012 and unit sales were 15.4 per cent higher.

As the chart shows, sales volumes were at significantly higher levels between 2001 and 2003 as the national housing market experienced a boom in home values. The market experienced another (lower) spike in housing market activity in 2007 and again in 2009. The most recent peak in activity occurred in September 2009, which was an important point for the national housing market with the partial roll-back of the boost

to the First Home Owner’s Grant commencing at the end of the month and interest rates starting to rise from their generational lows in October 2009.

Mortgage rates are now at lower levels than those recorded throughout 2009 and as the chart highlights the market has started to respond with buyer demand increasing. It is important to note that the response to generational low mortgage rates has not been as strong as the response in 2009, also at generational lows. This is likely due to a number of factors, namely: lower levels of consumer and business confidence, lower levels of growth in housing credit, a longer period of sustained household savings of around 10 per cent of disposable income, the slowing of the boom in mining sector investment and the absence of a boost to the First Home Owners Grant.

The average hold period of homes has continued to climb as sales have generally trended lower (See G7)Although sales volumes have recently started to increase, they remain well below the peak in sales activity recorded in the middle of 2003. The result of this has been that home owners are holding on to their homes for a longer period of time.

In fact the average hold period has continued to rise since late 2004 which coincides with the time that the housing boom had run out of steam. Of course, other factors have contributed to home owners holding on to their properties longer. Specifically, the higher price of housing means that transaction costs such as agency fees and stamp duty are much higher than they were over earlier periods. This is a significant impost on sellers and acts a disincentive for people to move homes on a more regular basis.

Looking at the average hold period, at a national level it was recorded at 9.6 years for houses and 8.3 years for units in June 2013. 12 months earlier, hold periods were recorded at 9.3 years and 7.9 years. If you go back 10 years, homes were selling after an average of just 6.7 years for houses and 5.8 years for units.

The majority of home sales over the 12 months to May 2013 have occurred at prices below $600,000 (See G8)Over the past 12 months, 37.8 per cent of all home sales occurred at a price point between $200,000 and $400,000. This price point was the one which had recorded the greatest proportion of all sales over the year. Sales of homes at a price point below $600,000 accounted for 77.2 per cent of all sales nationally over the past year. Although the market for housing above $1 million gets


21

Key StatisticsAuction clearance rates were much higher in 2013 than in previous years and although popular in certain regions, at a combined capital city level, they typically accounted for around 15 to 20 per cent of sales with private treaty sales accounting for the vast majority. RP Data’s most recent auction clearance rates have been recorded at 70 per cent which is their highest level since May 2010.

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

G10: Rolling four week average combined capital city auction clearance ratesAug-08 to Aug-13

Source: RP Data

Aug-08 Aug-09 Aug-10 Aug-11 Aug-12 Aug-13

300,000

250,000

200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0

300,000

250,000

200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0

Source: RP DataNew listings Total listings

G9: National number of properties advertised for sale

Aug-07 Aug-08 Aug-09 Aug-10 Aug-11 Aug-12 Aug-13

so much attention in the national press, these sales accounted for only 5.8 per cent of all transactions over the past year and only 1.0 per cent of sales were transacted for more than $2 million.

If we look back five years ago you can see that there has been a shift in the market to slightly higher price pointed sales. This is as a result of the impact of the growth in values over the period.

Over the 12 months to May 2008, 46.5 per cent of all sales were priced between $200,000 and $400,000 and 58.1 per cent of all sales were below $400,000. Over the past year just 47.4 per cent of sales were under $400,000. This result highlights a key challenge for price sensitive purchasers in the Australian market. Currently; there are fewer opportunities to purchase lower priced housing.

In 2008, 5.2 per cent of all home sales were in excess of $1 million compared to 5.8 per cent over the past year. Interestingly, 1.2 per cent of sales in excess of $1 million in 2008 were for more than $2 million compared to just 1.0 per cent over the past year. This reflects the fact that the premium sector of the housing market has been hardest hit by the downturn over recent years.

The number of homes available for sale has been trending lower (See G9)The number of properties available for sale across the country has moderated quite significantly throughout 2013 as sales transactions have increased.

After the number of properties available for sale peaked late in 2012 there has been a noticeable reduction in properties listed for sale. Based on unique counts of properties available for sale across the country, there are currently 248,131 properties listed for sale. The number of properties available for sale is currently 14.6 per cent lower than the market peak in November 2012 and 8.2 per cent lower than at the same time last year.

Total listings include a combination of newly advertised properties and properties re-advertised for sale.

The lower levels of stock available for sale currently is largely due to homes selling quicker, which then translates into a lower level of properties being re-listed. There are currently around 40,000 new listings being added to the market per month, which is 1.4 per cent lower than at the same time last year and 39.4 per cent lower than what was recorded at the peak of the market.

The relatively low number of properties available for sale, particularly at a time when buyers are increasingly becoming more active, means that selling conditions are improving with increased competition from potential purchasers.

Auction clearance rates much higher in 2013 than over the previous two years (See G10)Auction clearance rates are widely reported in Australia as they provide a timely update on the housing market. Although auctions are popular in certain regions, at a combined capital city level they typically account for around just 15 to 20 per cent of sales, with private treaty sales accounting for the vast majority of sales. Auctions also tend to be reflective of higher priced housing stock which tends to be the most likely stock type to be taken to auction.

The success rate of auctions as a means of selling a home has improved quite dramatically over the last 12 months. Throughout 2012, capital city auction clearance rates were recorded at an average of 50.4 per cent on a week-to-week basis. In comparison, auction clearance rates have been recorded at an average of 64.2 per cent on a week-to-week basis throughout 2013 to-date. More recently, clearance rates have been consistently recorded at around 70 per cent which is the highest level since May 2010. With clearance rates at noticeably higher


22

Key StatisticsAcross the combined capital cities housing market, the average time on market for houses as at June 2013 was 47 days and for a unit it was 42 days. At the same time last year, the average time on market was slightly shorter at 60 days for houses and 54 days for units.

0%

-2%

-4%

-6%

-8%

0%

-2%

-4%

-6%

-8%

G12: Average vendor discount – combined capital city dwellingsJun-06 to Jun-13

Source: RP Data, RP Data - Rismark


8%

7%

6%

5%

4%

3%

$500

$450

$400

$350

$300

$250

Weekly rental rate (LHS) Gross rental yield (RHS)

G11: Capital city rental rates and gross yieldsJun-97 to Jun-13


Jun-97 Jun-99 Jun-01 Jun-03 Jun-05 Jun-07 Jun-09 Jun-11 Jun-13

levels, it is no surprise that overall housing market conditions and particularly conditions across the premium sector of the housing market have been showing value increases throughout 2013.

Rental rates showing modest increases across most cities (See G11)Over the 12 months to June 2013, weekly rents across the combined capital cities increased at a moderate pace of 3.2 per cent for houses and 2.8 per cent for units.

The growth in house rents have been outpaced by growth in values however, unit rental growth has outpaced unit value growth. The growth in rents over the past year has been much lower than the five year average annual rental increases of 4.9 per cent for both houses and units. As at June 2013, the median rent for a capital city house was recorded at $478 per week and for a unit it was $444 per week.

With rental growth having been at a similar level to growth in home values over the past year, there has been no change to gross rental yields across the combined capital

cities over the period. Gross rental yields for houses are currently recorded at 4.2 per cent and for units at 4.9 per cent.

With rental vacancy rates remaining tight across most capital cities, we are anticipating further moderate increases in rental rates over the year. It will be interesting to follow the growth in home values and rents because if value growth outpaces rental growth we may start to see some erosion of rental yields over the coming year. Of course if value growth slows, yields would likely improve. As sales transactions increase we may also see some pressure released from the rental market as those that were previously renting move into home ownership.

Vendor discounting levels have improved as value growth has picked-up (See G12)Vendor discounting measures the percentage difference between the initial asking price of a property and the final contract price on the property. Vendor discounting levels have eased over the past year, which is reflective of an easing of stock available for sale and an increase in home values.

Vendor discounting levels across the combined capital cities were recorded at 6.5 per cent for houses and 5.6 per cent for units in June 2013.

At the same time a year ago, houses were being discounted by an average of 7.3 per cent and units by 7.0 per cent. The results highlight that as the housing market has improved over the past 12 months, buyer and seller expectations have also become more closely aligned, which has resulted in lower levels of discounting.

The average length of time on market has shortened as housing market conditions have improved (See G13)The average time on market is the number of days it takes from when a home is initially advertised for sale to when it ultimately sells. Note that it is only measured across actual home sales over the month and excludes sales by auction. The average time on market has fallen over the past 12 months.

Across the combined capital cities housing market, the average time on market for a house as at June 2013 was 47 days and for a unit was 42 days. At the same time a year earlier, the average time on market was slightly longer at 60 days for houses and 54 days for units. Much like the lower levels of vendor discounting, the fall in the average time on market reflects the pick-up in housing market activity and indicates buyers and sellers are meeting an agreeable price for sale in a more timely manner.


23

Key StatisticsAn escalation in land prices over time has been a major contributing factor to the high values of homes in Australia’s capital cities. Between June 1997 and June 2013, capital city land values increased by 267 per cent. Over the same period, capital city house values increased by 225 per cent.

250,000

200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0

250,000

200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0

G14: Combined capital city median land prices over time

Source: RP Data

Jun-97 Jun-99 Jun-01 Jun-03 Jun-05 Jun-07 Jun-09 Jun-11 Jun-13

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Average days on market

G13: Average time on market – combined city dwellingsJun-06 to Jun-13



Land prices are the real driver behind higher home values (See G14)The escalation of land prices over time has been a major contributing factor to the high values of homes in Australia’s capital cities. Between June 1997 and June 2013, capital city land values have increased by a total of 267 per cent. Over the same period, capital city house values have increased by 225 per cent. As this data shows, the escalation in overall home values has been driven by the higher cost of the underlying value of the land.

Over the three months to June 2013, the median selling price of vacant residential land across the combined capital cities was recorded at $240,250. There are a few things to keep in mind here. Firstly this is a cost just to purchase the land, when you add in the cost of physically building the home, the starting cost will be closer to $400,000.

While the cost of vacant residential land has escalated so much over recent years, the typical area of the land has declined. Over the three months to June 1997, the average area of capital city vacant land sold was 700 square metres.

Over the three months to June 2013, the average area has shrunk to 467 square metres. As a result of the compression of land sizes, the rate per square metre of capital city vacant land has increased to $541.67 per metre compared to $93.51 per metre in 1997. Based on this, if you were to purchase a 700 square metre block of vacant land today, which was the typical size in 1997, it would cost $379,169.

Vacant residential land costs across Australian capital cities are high due to a number of factors.

Firstly, development approvals take time and while developers await approvals they have to pay appropriate bank or government holding costs.

The development approval process is often inefficient and it can take a long time to receive approval. Unfortunately the costs are inevitably passed on to the end user, the purchaser of the vacant land.

Secondly, when a council grants development approval they will often make it a requirement that the developer commits to upgrades of infrastructure. Alternatively they will charge developers a cost per lot for the additional infrastructure required to service development.

Some typical infrastructure upgrades that a developer may have to pay include: a new road/roundabout, water infrastructure upgrades or sewerage infrastructure upgrades. Once again, this is a significant cost to the developer which ultimately is passed through to the purchaser of the land.

Finally, local councils normally have zoning

regulations and urban growth boundaries and population densities.

These zonings and boundaries limit how much new housing supply can enter the market at any one time. Often these regulations will lead to land banking by developers. What this means is that they will secure large tracts of land in particular areas and feed the new supply to the market over a period of time. If demand in the area is high, it will mean that they can charge a price premium.

These factors significantly contribute to the high cost of vacant land within Australian capital cities.

As a result, the cost of the ultimate end product, a dwelling, is also quite high. It is also important to keep in mind that most vacant land is located on the outskirts of the city where there is less local infrastructure and amenity and travel times around a city tend to be much longer. We believe this is one of the reasons why we are seeing an increasing trend towards inner city unit development as a logical alternative to new houses on the city fringe.

24

State by State analysis | RP Data Property Capital Markets Report, Spring 2013

38 daysSydney houses took an average of 38 days to sell in June 2013 compared to 58 days a year earlier. Units are taking an average of 31 days to sell currently compared to 46 days 12 months ago.

Key StatisticsBased on median selling prices over the three months to June 2013, Sydney house prices are $135,000 more expensive than units.

The average level of vendor discounting was recorded at 6.2 per cent for houses and 4.3 per cent for units in June 2013, at the same time in 2012 discount levels were 7.2 per cent and 5.6 per cent respectively.

Of those homes sold over the past 12 months in Sydney, houses had been owned by the vendors for an average of 10.7 years and units were owned for 8.2 years.

Over the three months to May 2013, 6.5 per cent of Sydney homes sold at a loss compared to their previous purchase price, compared to 7.9 per cent of homes over the same period 12 months earlier.

Sydney’s estimated residential population as at June 2012 was almost 4.7 million persons, with the population increasing by 1.3 per cent over the year and 63.9 per cent of the State’s overall population living within the city.

Sydney

Sydney home values rebound to a new historic high level (See G1)Sydney home values have increased by 5.6 per cent over the past 12 months and have now eclipsed their previous high point. House values have increased by 6.3 per cent over the year and unit values are 2.4 per cent higher. In June 2012, Sydney house values had fallen by 2.0 per cent over the previous 12 month period and unit values were 2.7 per cent lower. Local dwelling values in Sydney recently eclipsed their previous peaks and are now 1.2 per cent higher than the previous record high. Sydney home values recorded a peak in early 2004 following exceptional growth from 2001. From 2004 until 2009, Sydney saw virtually no growth in home values, with many parts of the city recording actual declines. In fact, when adjusted for inflation, Sydney home values still remain below their December 2003 peak. Sydney home values have recorded average annual growth of 3.8 per cent over the past five years, which is a significant improvement on the 2.5 per cent average annual growth over the past decade. Over the past ten years, Sydney has recorded the lowest average annual growth in home values of all capital cities.

Transaction volumes are starting to ramp-up across the city (See G2)Over the three months to May 2013, it was estimated that there were 15,864 house sales and 10,534 unit sales. In comparison to the same three month period in 2012, sales volumes were 30.6 per cent higher this year for houses and 23.6 per cent higher for units. Over the 12 months to May 2013, there were 52,243 houses and 35,618 units sold, which was 7.3 per cent higher and 2.9 per cent lower respectively compared to the same period last year. It is clear that the lower mortgage rate environment is having a positive impact on the Sydney housing market and resulting in not just increasing home values but also a lift in transaction activity. The lift in sales activity has been more significant for houses than it has been for units.

Rents and yields show modest improvements over the year (See G3)Although median weekly rents across Sydney have increased over the past year, growth in home values has outpaced rental growth. Median weekly rents for houses and units have each increased by 2.9 per cent over the past 12 months and median rents are recorded at $575 per week for houses and $500 per week for units. Although there has been moderate rental growth over the past year, it has been well below the average annual growth in rents over the past five years of 5.3 per cent for houses and 5.1 per cent for units. With house value growth outstripping rental growth over the past year, gross rental yields for houses have fallen from 4.4 per cent a year ago to 4.2 per cent currently. Unit gross rental yields have remained unchanged over the past year at 4.9 per cent.

25

RP Data, RP Data-Rismark Home Value Index, ABS

RP Data, RP Data-Rismark Home Value Index

RP Data Property Capital Markets Report, Spring 2013 | State by State analysis

Mon

thly

sale

s vol

umes

16,000

12,000

8,000

4,000

0

16,000

12,000

8,000

4,000

0

Sydney home sales 5 year average

G2: Sydney house and unit sales volumes vs. five year average

Source: RP Data

May

-97

May

-99

May

-01

May

-03

May

-05

May

-07

May

-09

May

-11

May

-13

Rent

al ra

te ($

)

Gro

ss re

ntal

yie

ld (%

)

600

530

460

390

320

250

6.5

5.8

5.1

4.4

3.7

3.0

Median weekly rent (LHS) Gross rental yield (RHS)

G3: Sydney gross rental yields and weekly rents


Jun-

97

Jun-

99

Jun-

01

Jun-

03

Jun-

05

Jun-

07

Jun-

09

Jun-

11

Jun-

13

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

-5%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

-5%


G1: Rolling quarterly and annual change in Sydney home values


Jun-

97

Jun-

99

Jun-

01

Jun-

03

Jun-

05

Jun-

07

Jun-

09

Jun-

11

Jun-

13

Sydney key statistics – June 2013Houses Units

Median price $635,000 $500,00012 month value growth 6.3% 2.4%5 yr average annual growth 3.7% 4.1%10 yr average annual growth 2.4% 2.7%15 yr average annual growth 6.1% 5.0%Average time on market (days) 38 31Average vendor discount -6.2% -4.3%Median weekly rental rates 575 500Gross rental yield 4.2% 4.9%Average hold period (years) 10.7 8.2

Regional New South WalesThe performance of regional New South Wales housing markets has been quite varied over the past 12 months although most regions have recorded an increase in house and unit values. For houses, the Richmond-Tweed region which adjoins Queensland’s Gold Coast is the only region to have recorded a fall in house values over the year, down 0.3 per cent. It was also the only unit market in which values have fallen, down by 0.5 per cent over the year.

Although house values have generally been rising in regional New South Wales markets over the past year, unlike Sydney in most areas they are yet to eclipse their previous peaks. The North

Western and Far West regions of the state are the only ones in which house values are currently at their historic peak. Elsewhere, house values are as much as 4.4 per cent lower than their peak in the Central West, 3.6 per cent lower in Murrumbidgee and 3.2 per cent lower in the Mid-North Coast.

In the two largest unit markets outside of Sydney, Hunter and Illawarra, values are now at an historic high level. Unit values in the Richmond-Tweed are 10.7 per cent lower than they were at their peak, in the Mid-North Coast values are 0.2 per cent lower than their peak and South Eastern values are 2.0 per cent off their peak.

Change in home values over timeHouses Units

Region 12 mth 5 yr From peak 12 mth 5 yr From peakHunter 5.6% 4.2% -0.3% 2.7% 2.5% 0.0%Illawarra 2.4% 3.7% -0.2% 3.7% 4.1% 0.0%Richmond-Tweed -0.3% 1.0% -1.7% -0.5% -1.3% -10.7%Mid-North Coast 1.0% 2.8% -3.2% 1.3% 2.2% -0.2%Northern 6.7% 7.3% -1.3%North Western 7.1% 8.9% 0.0%Central West 5.1% 8.8% -4.4%South Eastern 3.5% 4.0% -1.8% 2.2% 3.4% -2.0%Murrumbidgee 1.1% 3.8% -3.6%Murray 11.2% 5.0% -1.4%Far West 5.3% 4.8% 0.0%Reference: 12 mth = 12 month change, 5 yr = Average annual change over five years, 10 yr = Average annual change over 10 years, From peak = change in values since the market peak.

26


8.4%8.4 per cent of homes sold over the three months to May 2013 sold for less than their initial purchase price compared to 6.9 per cent over the same period in 2012.

Melbourne’s housing market has rebounded over the past 12 months (See G1)Home values across Melbourne have been quite resurgent over the past year increasing by 3.4 per cent, with house values up 3.3 per cent compared to a 4.1 per cent increase in unit values. Over the same period to June 2012, both house and unit values had fallen by 6.6 per cent indicating quite a dramatic reversal of fortunes for the market over the past year. Although home values have increased over the past year, house values are currently 6.9 per cent lower than their historic peak and unit values are 4.9 per cent lower. Over the past decade, Melbourne house values have increased at an average annual rate of 5.6 per cent and unit values at 4.6 per cent. Over the past five years, Melbourne has been the second strongest capital city for capital growth with house values having increased at an average annual rate of just 3.5 per cent and units by 4.1 per cent. Home values in Melbourne have been through several distinct cycles over the decade, having recorded strong growth between 2001 and 2004, a consolidation period between 2004 and 2006, further strong growth in 2007, value falls in 2008 and a rebound during 2009 and 2010, with moderation thereafter.

Melbourne sales volumes are back above the five year average (See G2)Over the three months to May 2013, RP Data estimates that there were 15,518 house sales and 6,570 unit sales. In comparison to the same period in 2012, sales volumes are currently 15.0 per cent higher for houses and 12.4 per cent higher for units. Over the 12 months to May 2013, there have been 52,760 houses and 21,943 units sold across the city. Sales volumes for houses are 7.7 per cent higher than over the same period a year ago whereas unit sales are 3.0 per cent lower. Similar to Sydney, Melbourne’s housing market is clearly experiencing a positive reaction to the current low mortgage rates however, the reaction has been stronger in the housing market than the unit market.

Moderate growth in rents and the lowest yields of any capital city (See G3)Growth in Melbourne home values has outpaced the growth in rents over the year to June 2013. Melbourne house rents have increased by 2.2 per cent over the year to $436 per week and unit rents are recorded at $391 per week following a 2.3 per cent increase over the year. The growth in rents over the past 12 months has been lower than the average annual increases over the past five years of 3.8 per cent for houses and 3.9 per cent for units. With growth in values outstripping the growth in rents over the past year, gross rental yields for houses have remained unchanged while unit yields have weakened. House yields are currently recorded at 3.7 per cent and unit yields are recorded at 4.4 per cent, down from 4.5 per cent at the same time a year ago.

Key StatisticsBased on median selling prices over the three months to June 2013, Melbourne house prices are $79,000 higher than units.

The average level of vendor discounting was recorded at 7.2 per cent for houses and 6.0 per cent for units in June 2013 compared to 7.1 per cent for houses and 7.7 per cent for units a year earlier.

Melbourne homes are selling much quicker than they were at the same time a year ago. In June 2012, it took an average of 57 days to sell a house and 60 days to sell a unit. Currently it takes an average of 41 days to sell a house and 37 days for a unit.

Amongst residential homes sold over the 12 months to June 2013, vendors had owned their houses for an average of 11.1 years and units for 9.3 years.

The estimated residential population of Melbourne as at June 2012 was more than 4.2 million persons. The population increased by almost 1.9 per cent over the year and 75.4 per cent of the State’s residents lived in the capital city.

Melbourne

27




Rent

al ra

te ($

)

Gro

ss re

ntal

yie

ld (%

)

450

400

350

300

250

9.0

7.5

6.0

4.5

3.0


G3: Melbourne gross rental yields and weekly rents


Jun-

97

Jun-

99

Jun-

01

Jun-

03

Jun-

05

Jun-

07

Jun-

09

Jun-

11

Jun-

13

Mon

thly

sale

s vol

umes

12,000

10,000

8,000

6,000

4,000

2,000

0

12,000

10,000

8,000

6,000

4,000

2,000

0

Melbourne home sales 5 year average

G2: Melbourne house and unit sales volumes vs. five year average

Source: RP Data

May

-97

May

-99

May

-01

May

-03

May

-05

May

-07

May

-09

May

-11

May

-13

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

-5%

-10%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

-5%

-10%


G1: Rolling quarterly and annual change in Melbourne home values


Jun-

97

Jun-

99

Jun-

01

Jun-

03

Jun-

05

Jun-

07

Jun-

09

Jun-

11

Jun-

13


Region 12 mth 5 yr From peak 12 mth 5 yr From peakBarwon 2.1% 6.3% -3.3% -7.4% 1.1% -15.5%Western District 6.5% 7.3% -0.2%Central Highlands 8.3% 10.0% -0.8%Wimmera 8.0% 11.6% -1.1%Mallee 2.3% 2.1% -3.6%Loddon 8.0% 8.9% 0.0%Goulburn 4.0% 5.9% -3.6%Ovens-Murray 3.2% 3.6% -4.9%East Gippsland 8.3% 8.6% -2.0%Gippsland 0.9% 7.1% -3.3%Reference: 12 mth = 12 month change, 5 yr = Average annual change over five years, 10 yr = Average annual change over 10 years, From peak = change in values since the market peak.

Melbourne key statistics – June 2013Houses Units


Regional VictoriaMuch like Melbourne home values, regional housing markets across Victoria have typically recorded an increase in values throughout the past year. Over the 12 months to June 2013, Melbourne home values have increased by 3.4 per cent and most regional areas have actually recorded a superior level of capital gain. All regions have recorded growth in house values over the year whereas the unit market in Barwon has recorded a 7.4 per cent value fall over the past year.

House values have increased across each regional market over the past 12 months, however the Loddon region is the only market in which home values are now at an historic high level. The greatest

value falls since the market peak in regional Victoria have been recorded in Ovens-Murray (4.9 per cent), Mallee (3.6 per cent) and Barwon (3.3 per cent).

The Barwon region, which includes a large volume of units within popular coastal markets, is the only regional area of Victoria for which unit market statistics are calculated. As mentioned, values across this region have fallen by 7.4 per cent over the year and they are 15.5 per cent lower than they were at their peak. This is largely a result of weakness over recent years within many of the coastal ‘lifestyle’ markets around the region.

28


2.2 millionBrisbane’s population was estimated to be almost 2.2 million persons as at June 2012, which was 2.0 per cent higher over the year. Brisbane is the State’s most populous city however, just 48.0 per cent of all QLD residents live in Brisbane.

Brisbane home values are up 0.6 per cent over the year, a fairly muted response to the low mortgage rate environment (See G1)Brisbane home values have increased by 0.6 per cent over the 2012/13 financial year, driven by a 0.9 per cent increase in house values whereas unit values have fallen by 1.8 per cent. Although value growth is limited, it is a significant improvement on the declines of 4.6 per cent and 2.5 per cent respectively on an annual basis at the same time in 2012. Although values have recorded some minor growth over the past year, house values are currently 10.8 per cent below their peak and unit values are 10.6 per cent lower. Ever since the national property market began recording strong growth post the financial crisis, Brisbane has significantly underperformed other capital city markets. Capital gains have been limited after Brisbane’s housing market outperformed most other capital cities for most of the previous decade. Over the past ten years, Brisbane home values have increased at an average annual rate of 5.0 per cent compared to an annual average fall of 1.1 per cent over the past five years.

Sales volumes in Brisbane have increased at a slower rate than most other cities (See G2)Based on RP Data estimates, there were 7,512 houses and 2,902 units sold across Brisbane over the three months to May 2013. In comparison to activity over the same period a year ago, sales volumes for houses are 14.1 per cent higher and unit sales volumes are 8.0 per cent lower. Looking at sales over the past year, there have been 28,059 houses and 11,418 units sold across the city. The volume of house sales is 10.7 per cent higher than a year ago whereas unit sales are just 0.8 per cent higher. The Brisbane housing market is not responding with the same vigour as other capital cities to the low mortgage rate environment, however sales activity across the city is slowly trending higher.

Unit rental yields in Brisbane are particularly strong and rising (See G3)The current median weekly advertised rent for a Brisbane house is $422 while median unit rents are recorded at $410. Although the annual increase in rents has been moderate over the past year, rental growth has outpaced home value growth providing an improved yield scenario for Brisbane’s housing market. House rents have increased by 2.9 per cent over the past year compared to a 2.5 per cent increase in unit rents. Rental growth for both houses and units has underperformed compared to average annual rental growth over the past five years, which has been recorded at 3.9 per cent for houses and 3.8 per cent for units. With rental growth outpacing value growth, we have seen yields improve over the past 12 months. House yields have improved to 4.7 per cent currently from 4.6 per cent a year ago. Unit yields have shifted from 5.5 per cent a year ago to 5.7 per cent currently; the second highest gross yield of any capital city.

Key StatisticsMedian house prices across the city are $80,000 higher than unit prices over the three months to June 2013.

The average level of vendor discounting in June 2013 has shown an improvement compared with June 2012, however discounting remains higher than average. Discounting levels are currently recorded at 7.5 per cent for houses and 7.2 per cent for units compared to 8.8 per cent for houses and 8.0 per cent for units a year ago.

Of those Brisbane properties that sold over the past year, vendors had owned their houses for an average of 9.5 years and units for 7.9 years.

It is taking a similar length of time to sell a Brisbane home to what it was a year ago. Houses and units are currently selling after an average of 62 days and 65 days respectively on the market. In June 2012 it took an average of 63 days to sell a house and 68 days to sell a unit.

Over the three months to May 2013, 16.7 per cent of Brisbane homes sold for less than their purchase price compared to 16.9 per cent at the same time a year ago.

Brisbane

29

RP Data Property Capital Markets Report, Spring 2013 | State by state analysis



Rent

al ra

te ($

)

Gro

ss re

ntal

yie

ld (%

)

450

400

350

300

250

200

8.5

7.5

6.5

5.5

4.5

3.5


G3: Brisbane gross rental yields and weekly rents


Jun-

97

Jun-

99

Jun-

01

Jun-

03

Jun-

05

Jun-

07

Jun-

09

Jun-

11

Jun-

13

Mon

thly

sale

s vol

umes

8,000

6,000

4,000

2,000

0

8,000

6,000

4,000

2,000

0

Brisbane home sales 5 year average

G2: Brisbane house and unit sales volumes vs. five year average

Source: RP Data

May

-97

May

-99

May

-01

May

-03

May

-05

May

-07

May

-09

May

-11

May

-13

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

-10%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

-10%


G1: Rolling quarterly and annual change in Brisbane home values


Jun-

97

Jun-

99

Jun-

01

Jun-

03

Jun-

05

Jun-

07

Jun-

09

Jun-

11

Jun-

13

Brisbane key statistics – June 2013Houses Units

Median price $450,000 $370,00012 month value growth 0.9% -1.8%5 yr average annual growth -1.2% -0.4%10 yr average annual growth 5.0% 5.3%15 yr average annual growth 7.8% 5.6%Average time on market (days) 62 65Average vendor discount -7.5% -7.2%Median weekly rental rates 422 410Gross rental yield 4.7% 5.7%Average hold period (years) 9.5 7.9

Regional QueenslandQueensland has the least centralised population of all Australian states with more than half of its residents living outside of the capital city Brisbane. As a result of these conditions, regional markets tend to be larger than in most other states and their performances have been vastly different. This is highlighted by the fact that house values have risen by as much as 16.1 per cent in the North West region over the past year and by as little as 1.6 per cent on the Gold Coast. Generally, regional markets have recorded stronger value growth over the past year than the 0.6 per cent increase in Brisbane.

House values are currently at historically high levels in the Far North and North West regions of the state, elsewhere they remain lower than their peak. Houses on the Gold Coast are currently significantly lower than their peak (10.4 per cent), while values are 4.8 per cent lower on the Sunshine Coast and 3.4 per cent lower on the Darling Downs. The results highlight the weakness in house values in coastal markets and coupled with Brisbane it shows a weak South-East Queensland market over recent years.


Region 12 mth 5 yr From peak 12 mth 5 yr From peakGold Coast 1.6% -1.7% -10.4% -2.9% -3.2% -16.0%Sunshine Coast 2.1% 1.1% -4.8% -4.5% -2.5% -13.6%West Moreton 13.1% 3.9% -0.2%Wide Bay-Burnett 3.0% 1.1% -2.6%Darling Downs 3.4% 4.9% -3.4% 0.4% -2.3% -15.8%South West 4.3% 1.6% -0.4%Fitzroy 8.7% 4.6% -0.5%Central West 4.3% 1.6% -0.4%Mackay 13.7% 6.7% -0.6%Northern 7.3% 1.0% -2.3% -4.5% -1.9% -16.6%Far North 5.8% 1.7% 0.0% -3.5% -3.4% -16.5%North West 16.1% 9.4% 0.0%Reference: 12 mth = 12 month change, 5 yr = Average annual change over five years, 10 yr = Average annual change over 10 years, From peak = change in values since the market peak.

30


7.8 yearsOf the houses that have sold within Adelaide over the 12 months to June 2013, the vendors had owned them for an average of 7.8 years and units had been owned for an average of 7.6 years.

Adelaide’s housing market is showing only limited signs of recovery (See G1)Adelaide home values have increased by just 0.2 per cent over the 12 months to June 2013. House values have increased by 0.2 per cent and the much smaller unit market has seen values fall by 0.4 per cent. Although there has been little growth in home values, the housing market has improved over the years with house values falling by 2.4 per cent and unit values down 2.3 per cent over the same 12 month period a year ago. Adelaide’s housing market recorded stronger conditions than those across the combined capital cities between late 2002 and early 2006 and the market significantly outperformed once again in 2007. Since the onset of the financial crisis, Adelaide has consistently underperformed the capital city benchmark. Capital gains in the housing market have been much stronger over the first five years of the past decade with house values increasing at an average annual rate of 10.0 per cent and units by 9.5 per cent annually over the period. In comparison, over the past five years house values have increased at an annual rate of 0.8 per cent compared to an annual 0.6 per cent fall in unit values.

Sales activity in Adelaide has started to pick up over recent months (See G2)Over the three months to May 2013, RP Data estimates that there were 4,926 houses and 1,648 units sold in Adelaide. Based on this level of activity, sales transactions are 8.5 per cent higher than over the corresponding period a year ago for houses and 16.3 per cent higher for units. Over the 12 months to May 2013, there were 18,287 houses and 5,670 units sold across Adelaide. These figures indicate a 3.6 per cent lift in house sales over the year and a 1.1 per cent increase in unit sales. Overall the data indicates that the Adelaide housing market is responding to the lower mortgage rates with increased housing market activity however, it has not been a surge in activity rather just a moderate response to date.

Limited rental pressures across Adelaide (See G3)Adelaide median weekly rents for a house are currently recorded at $365 per week and for units they sit at $310 per week. Rental growth has been moderate for houses over the past year, increasing by 2.1 per cent while unit rents are virtually unchanged, up by 0.8 per cent. Although growth in rents has been low it has outstripped growth in values of houses and units. Rental growth over the past year has also been much lower than five year average annual levels which have been recorded at 3.6 per cent for houses and 3.4 per cent for units. With rental growth outstripping value growth, there has been a slight improvement in gross rental yields. House yields have shifted from 4.3 per cent a year ago to 4.4 per cent. Unit yields have increased to 4.9 per cent in June 2013 from 4.8 per cent a year earlier.

Key StatisticsOver the three months to June 2013 the median house price was $60,000 greater than the median unit price.

Vendor discounting is at a lower level than a year ago. In June 2012, discount levels for houses were 7.2 per cent, lower than the 7.6 per cent for units. In June of this year discounts were recorded at 6.4 per cent for houses and 6.8 per cent for units.

Adelaide’s residential population was estimated to be almost 1.3 million in June 2012 with 77.1 per cent of the State’s population living in the capital city. Over the year, Adelaide’s population grew by 1.1 per cent.

Homes are taking a shorter length of time to sell across Adelaide than they were at the same time last year. A year ago, houses took an average of 70 days to sell and units 74 days, in June 2013 houses took an average of 56 days to sell and units took 54 days.

Over the three months to May 2012, 11.3 per cent of Adelaide homes sold for less than their purchase price, over the same period this year 12.8 per cent of homes sold for lower than their purchase price.

Adelaide

31

RP Data Property Capital Markets Report, Spring 2013 | State by state analysis



Rent

al ra

te ($

)

Gro

ss re

ntal

yie

ld (%

)

380

350

320

290

260

230

200

9.0

8.0

7.0

6.0

5.0

4.0

3.0


G3: Adelaide gross rental yields and weekly rents


Jun-

97

Jun-

99

Jun-

01

Jun-

03

Jun-

05

Jun-

07

Jun-

09

Jun-

11

Jun-

13

Mon

thly

sale

s vol

umes

3,600

3,000

2,400

1,800

1,200

600

0

3,600

3,000

2,400

1,800

1,200

600

0

Adelaide home sales 5 year average

G2: Adelaide house and unit sales volumes vs. five year average

Source: RP Data

May

-97

May

-99

May

-01

May

-03

May

-05

May

-07

May

-09

May

-11

May

-13

30%

20%

10%

0%

-10%

30%

20%

10%

0%

-10%


G1: Rolling quarterly and annual change in Adelaide home values


Jun-

97

Jun-

99

Jun-

01

Jun-

03

Jun-

05

Jun-

07

Jun-

09

Jun-

11

Jun-

13

Change in home values over timeHouses

Region 12 mth 5 yr From peakOuter Adelaide 2.9% 5.4% -3.3%Yorke and Lower North -3.1% 5.8% -10.6%Murray Lands -2.1% 3.4% -13.2%South East 4.1% 2.6% -2.5%Eyre 3.1% 3.6% -2.2%Northern 0.5% 0.2% -4.2%Reference: 12 mth = 12 month change, 5 yr = Average annual change over five years, 10 yr = Average annual change over 10 years, From peak = change in values since the market peak.

Adelaide key statistics – June 2013Houses Units

Median price $395,000 $335,00012 month value growth 0.2% -0.4%5 yr average annual growth 0.8% -0.6%10 yr average annual growth 5.3% 4.4%15 yr average annual growth 8.1% 6.9%Average time on market (days) 56 54Average vendor discount -6.4% -6.8%Median weekly rental rates 365 310Gross rental yield 4.4% 4.9%Average hold period (years) 7.8 7.6

Regional South AustraliaRegional South Australian housing markets have generally experienced stronger levels of value growth over the past year than the 0.2 per cent increase in Adelaide home values. Houses are the only product type of significance in regional South Australia; values across these areas have generally risen over the past year with Yorke and Lower North (down 3.1 per cent) and Murray lands (down 2.1 per cent) the exceptions.

Across the detached housing market, despite the fact that a number of regions have recorded value increases over the year, all markets have values which are currently below their historic highs. The Eyre region has the lowest magnitude of decline at just 2.2 per cent below its peak. House values in the Murray Lands region are 13.2 per cent lower than their historic high and Yorke and Lower North values are 10.6 per cent lower.

Quick FactSouth Australia’s population increased by 1.0 per cent over the 12 months to June 2012 to an estimated 1.65 million persons. Over the past ten years South Australia’s population has increased by an average annual rate of 0.8 per cent each year.

32


$101,000 Median unit prices across the city were $101,000 lower than house prices over the three months to June 2013.

Growth in home values in Perth has been strong over the past year (See G1)Growth in home values in Perth has been strong over the past year, with local dwelling values increasing by 6.0 per cent. House values have increased by 6.3 per cent over the year and unit values have risen by 2.4 per cent. This is a reversal of fortunes for house values in Perth considering they fell by 0.2 per cent over the 12 months to June 2012 compared to a 1.4 per cent annual increase in unit values. Up until the past eighteen months, the Perth housing market has recorded little growth in home values for more than five years, following exceptional growth over the preceding period. The previous surge in home values was largely associated with a boom in investment in the mining and resources sector over the period. Given that values have previously shown no increase for such a long period of time, it is clear that Perth home values overshot the mark prior to 2007. Over the most recent five years, Perth house values have increased at an average annual rate of 0.8 per cent, whilst unit values have risen by 0.2 per cent annually. Over the five years to June 2008, Perth house values rose at an average annual rate of 16.9 per cent and unit values by 14.9 per cent annually.

Transaction volumes across Perth have been rising as market conditions improve (See G2)RP Data estimates that over the three months to May 2013, there were 10,253 houses and 2,376 units sold in Perth. Based on these sales, the number of transactions was 28.8 per cent higher than a year ago for houses and 31.2 per cent higher for units. Over the 12 months to May 2013, there were 35,159 Perth house sales and 8,144 unit sales. In comparison to the number of sales over the 12 months to May 2012, activity over the past year has been 26.8 per cent higher for houses and 34.0 per cent higher for units. The data indicates that the low mortgage rate environment has resulted in a strong reaction from the market with a significant increase in sales activity as rates have fallen.

Rental rates surging throughout the city (See G3)Rental rates across Perth have surged over the past year, increasing by 7.7 per cent for houses and by 7.4 per cent for units. The median weekly rent is recorded at $510 per week for houses and $452 per week for units. Rental growth over the past year has been stronger than the five year average annual growth level. Although growth has been strong over the year, it is important to note rental growth has slowed over the past few months, perhaps foreshadowing slowing demand across the city. Although value growth has been outpaced by rental growth, gross rental yields for houses are unchanged over the year at 4.4 per cent. The more sluggish level of unit value growth has seen yields increase to 5.1 per cent from 4.9 per cent a year ago.

Key StatisticsThe average level of vendor discounting has shown a subtle improvement over the year for houses and a much greater improvement for units. Discounting levels for houses are currently recorded at 6.1 per cent and units are at 5.0 per cent. In June 2012 they were recorded at 6.4 per cent and 6.8 per cent respectively.

The length of time it takes to sell a house in Perth has also improved over the year. Houses are currently taking an average of 49 days to sell and units 52 days. In June 2012 they were taking an average of 60 days and 59 days respectively.

Across Perth, of the homes sold over the 12 months to June 2013, vendors had on average owned their houses for 8.3 years and units for 7.7 years.

4.9 per cent of homes sold over the three months to May 2013 sold for less than their purchase price compared to 11.6 per cent of homes over the same period in 2012.

The estimated residential population of Perth as at June 2012 was more than 1.9 million persons. The population had increased by 3.6 per cent over the year, with 78.0 per cent of all Western Australians living in Perth.

Perth

33




Rent

al ra

te ($

)

Gro

ss re

ntal

yie

ld (%

)

520

470

420

370

320

270

220

8.5

7.5

6.5

5.5

4.5

3.5

2.5


G3: Perth gross rental yields and weekly rents


Jun-

97

Jun-

99

Jun-

01

Jun-

03

Jun-

05

Jun-

07

Jun-

09

Jun-

11

Jun-

13

Mon

thly

sale

s vol

umes

6,000

5,000

4,000

3,000

2,000

1,000

0

6,000

5,000

4,000

3,000

2,000

1,000

0

Perth home sales 5 year average

G2: Perth house and unit sales volumes vs. five year average

Source: RP Data

May

-97

May

-99

May

-01

May

-03

May

-05

May

-07

May

-09

May

-11

May

-13

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

-10%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

-10%


G1: Rolling quarterly and annual change in Perth home values


Jun-

97

Jun-

99

Jun-

01

Jun-

03

Jun-

05

Jun-

07

Jun-

09

Jun-

11

Jun-

13


Region 12 mth 5 yr From peak 12 mth 5 yr From peakSouth West 5.6% 2.5% -1.3% 3.3% 5.4% -3.9%Lower Great Southern -4.5% 1.0% -7.3%Upper Great Southern 10.7% 4.2% 0.0%Midlands 2.4% 9.8% -8.0%South Eastern 6.9% 1.2% -1.4%Central 10.0% 8.8% -2.9%Pilbara 16.7% 5.3% 0.0%Kimberley 10.7% 4.2% 0.0%Reference: 12 mth = 12 month change, 5 yr = Average annual change over five years, 10 yr = Average annual change over 10 years, From peak = change in values since the market peak.

Perth key statistics – June 2013Houses Units


Regional Western AustraliaMuch like the performance of home values in Perth, regional Western Australian markets have generally recorded quite high levels of capital growth over the past year. Detached house values have risen by as much as 16.7 per cent in the Pilbara region over the year and Lower Great Southern was the only region in which values fell, down 4.5 per cent.

Regional house values are currently at their historic high level in Upper Great Southern, Pilbara and the Kimberley. Elsewhere, values

are down as much as 8.0 per cent in the Midlands, 7.3 per cent in Lower Great Southern and 2.9 per cent in the Central region.

The South West region has the only significant regional unit market across the state and it has recorded a 3.3 per cent increase in values over the past year. The region has seen a significant correction in values over recent years however; the market is now clearly improving with values currently just 3.9 per cent lower than their previous highs.

34


8.5%Vendor discounting levels in Hobart have fallen for houses but increased for units over the past year. The average level of vendor discounting for a house has fallen to 8.5 per cent in June 2013 from 10.5 per cent a year ago. For units, discount levels have risen from 7.9 per cent a year ago to 13.6 per cent.

Hobart’s housing market the weakest of all capital cities (See G1)Hobart is the only capital city in which home values have fallen over the past 12 months, down 1.8 per cent. House values have fallen by 2.0 per cent over the year and unit values are 0.1 per cent lower. Although declines have continued, the magnitude of value falls is much lower than at the same time in 2012 when house and unit values had fallen by 5.1 per cent and 6.4 per cent respectively over the year. Hobart’s housing market recorded exceptional capital gains between late 2002 and 2004 with annual value growth peaking at one point at 57.9 per cent. Since that time the Hobart housing market has largely underperformed the combined capital cities benchmark. Over the five years to June 2013, Hobart house values have declined at an average annual rate of 0.5 per cent and unit values have fallen at a faster average annual rate of 1.1 per cent. In comparison, house values rose at an average annual rate of 11.6 per cent between June 2003 and June 2008 and unit values rose by 10.1 per cent annually.

Hobart sales activity has started to pick up over recent months from a very low base (See G2)Over the three months to May 2013, RP Data estimates that there were 919 houses and 268 units sold across the Hobart housing market. The number of sales over this three month period was 37.3 per cent higher for houses than over the same period a year ago and 39.8 per cent higher for units than a year ago. Over the 12 months to May 2013, there were 3,045 houses and 901 units sold in Hobart. Based on this data, the number of house sales was 10.5 per cent higher than over the 12 months to May 2012 and unit sales were 6.3 per cent higher. The Hobart housing market is clearly starting to show an increase in sales activity, however the improvement to date, at least from a capital gains perspective, has not been as strong as the pick-up seen in most other capital cities.

Rental markets remain week across Hobart (See G3)The Hobart rental market has also been weak over the past year with house rents increasing by just 0.1 per cent over the year whilst unit rents fell by 3.0 per cent. Median rents are currently recorded at $332 per week for houses and $276 per week for units. Growth in house rents has outstripped house value growth while the declines in unit values have been smaller than the declines in unit rents. The limited growth in rental rates is a reflection of little growth in demand and a sufficient supply of housing. It is also reflective of the fact that housing is relatively affordable, therefore resulting in lower rental demand. Gross rental yields for houses have increased from 5.1 per cent a year ago to 5.2 per cent currently. Conversely, yields for units have fallen to 5.2 per cent from 5.4 per cent a year ago.

Key StatisticsBased on median selling prices over the three months to June 2013, houses across the city were $60,000 more expensive than units.

Hobart houses sold over the 12 months to June 2013 had been owned by the vendors for an average of 9.1 years and units had been owned for an average of 8.5 years.

Over the three months to May 2013, 17.4 per cent of Hobart homes sold for a lower price than what they were purchased compared to 17.1 per cent over the same period a year ago.

As at June 2012, Hobart was estimated to be home to almost 217,000 persons or 42.3 per cent of Tasmania’s overall population. Hobart’s population increased by 0.3 per cent over the period.

The average number of days on the market has risen for units but fallen for houses over the past year. Houses were taking an average of 96 days to sell a year ago and units took 104 days. In June of this year, houses took an average of 78 days to sell and units took 112 days to sell.

Hobart

35




Rent

al ra

te ($

)

Gro

ss re

ntal

yie

ld (%

)

350

300

250

200

150

12.0

10.0

8.0

6.0

4.0


G3: Hobart gross rental yields and weekly rents


Jun-

99

Jun-

01

Jun-

03

Jun-

05

Jun-

07

Jun-

09

Jun-

11

Jun-

13

Mon

thly

sale

s vol

umes

750

600

450

300

150

0

750

600

450

300

150

0

Hobart home sales 5 year average

G2: Hobart house and unit sales volumes vs. five year average

Source: RP Data

May

-97

May

-99

May

-01

May

-03

May

-05

May

-07

May

-09

May

-11

May

-13


G1: Rolling quarterly and annual change in Hobart home values


Jun-

99

Jun-

01

Jun-

03

Jun-

05

Jun-

07

Jun-

09

Jun-

11

Jun-

13

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

-10%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

-10%

Change in home values over timeHouses

Region 12 mth 5 yr From peakSouthern -6.2% 8.7% -13.1%Northern -1.7% 0.5% -7.7%Mersey-Lyell -2.4% 0.8% -7.8%Reference: 12 mth = 12 month change, 5 yr = Average annual change over five years, 10 yr = Average annual change over 10 years, From peak = change in values since the market peak.

Hobart key statistics – June 2013Houses Units

Median price $330,000 $270,00012 month value growth -2.0% -0.1%5 yr average annual growth -0.5% -1.1%10 yr average annual growth 5.4% 4.3%15 yr average annual growth 8.0% 6.2%Average time on market (days) 78 141Average vendor discount -8.5% -13.6%Median weekly rental rates 332 276Gross rental yield 5.2% 5.2%Average hold period (years) 9.1 8.5

Regional TasmaniaHome values in Hobart have fallen by 1.8 per cent over the past year. Similarly, the three regional markets of the state have also recorded falling home values. Across the three regional areas, house values have fallen by as much as 6.2 per cent in the Southern region and by as little as 1.7 per cent in the Northern region of the state.

Across each of the regional detached housing markets, values remain below their historic highs and the weakness across the market is highlighted by the low rates of average annual value growth across most regions over the past five years. Values in the Southern region are 13.1 per cent lower than their peak, in the Mersey-Lyell region they are 7.8 per cent lower and they are 7.7 per cent lower in the Northern region.

Quick FactAs of June 2012, there was an estimated 512,019 persons residing in Tasmania, up 0.2 per cent, or a total of just over 800 persons over the twelve months. Over the past decade, Tasmania’s population growth has been recorded at an average of 0.8 per cent each year.

36


44 daysThe average number of days on market has eased over the past year. Houses are currently taking an average of 44 days to sell and units 57 days. In June 2012 houses took an average of 56 days to sell and units took 74 days.

Darwin’s housing market swiftly recovering from its recent correction (See G1)Home values in Darwin have increased by 6.1 per cent over the 12 months to June 2013. House values have increased by 6.1 per cent and unit values have risen by 6.4 per cent. At the same time a year earlier, house values had fallen by 1.9 per cent and unit values were down 0.6 per cent. Although the annual rate of value growth has been strong, values have actually fallen by 0.4 per cent over the first half of 2013. Darwin’s housing market consistently outperformed the combined capital city result between 2004 and mid-2010. Following this period, it experienced a short and sharp correction in values, however it has recorded strong levels of value growth over the past 12 to 18 months. House values increased at an average annual rate of 15.8 per cent over the five years to June 2008 compared to 4.4 per cent growth annually over the past five years. It is a similar story in the unit market with values increasing at an average annual rate of 3.6 per cent over the past five years compared to 15.1 per cent average annual growth over the five years to June 2008.

Darwin sales activity has increased over the past year (See G2)Based on RP Data estimates, there were 592 houses and 286 units sold across Darwin over the three months to May 2013. Over this period, house sales were 17.5 per cent higher than over the same period a year earlier while unit sales were 7.1 per cent lower. Based on RP Data’s figures there were 2,113 houses and 1,090 units sold over the 12 months to May 2013. Sales activity over the past 12 months has been 14.8 per cent higher for houses and 11.8 per cent higher for units than the corresponding 12 month period a year ago. Over the past year, sales activity has been trending higher across the city, clearly assisted by the low mortgage rate environment. With a slowing resources sector it will remain to be seen whether this continues.

Rental rates surge over the past 12 months (See G3)Median rents for houses in Darwin are currently recorded at $619 per week and unit rents sit at $486 per week. Over the 12 months to June 2013, house rents have increased by 9.3 per cent and unit rents have risen by 8.5 per cent. Rental growth over the past year has been stronger than the five year averages for houses and units (7.6 per cent and 7.1 per cent respectively) however, the rate of rental growth has slowed dramatically throughout 2013. Growth in rents over the past year has outpaced growth in home values and subsequently yields have increased slightly. In June 2012, both houses and units had a gross rental yield of 6.1 per cent and over the past year both have increased to 6.2 per cent.

Key StatisticsUnits are $70,000 more affordable than houses currently based on median selling prices over the three months to June 2013.

Across Darwin, the levels of vendor discounting are currently at a similar level to what they were a year ago. Discounting has increased from 4.1 per cent a year ago for houses to 4.3 per cent currently. Unit discounts are steady at 5.3 per cent over the year.

As at June 2012 Darwin’s estimated population was 132,000 persons and increased by 2.0 per cent over the year.

Of the residential properties sold across the city over the past year, vendors had owned their houses for an average of 6.0 years and unit owners had held their properties for 5.5 years.

8.3 per cent of Darwin homes sold for less than their previous purchase price over the three months to May 2012 compared to 10.8 per cent of homes over the same period in 2013.

Darwin

37



Rent

al ra

te ($

)

Gro

ss re

ntal

yie

ld (%

)

600

550

500

450

400

350

300

10.0

9.0

8.0

7.0

6.0

5.0

4.0


G3: Darwin gross rental yields and weekly rents


Jun-

01

Jun-

03

Jun-

05

Jun-

07

Jun-

09

Jun-

11

Jun-

13

Mon

thly

sale

s vol

umes

500

400

300

200

100

0

500

400

300

200

100

0

Darwin home sales 5 year average

G2: Darwin house and unit sales volumes vs. five year average

Source: RP Data

May

-99

May

-01

May

-03

May

-05

May

-07

May

-09

May

-11

May

-13

30%

20%

10%

0%

-10%

-20%

30%

20%

10%

0%

-10%

-20%


G1: Rolling quarterly and annual change in Darwin home values


Jun-

03

Jun-

05

Jun-

07

Jun-

09

Jun-

11

Jun-

13

Darwin key statistics – June 2013Houses Units

Median price $520,000 $450,00012 month value growth 6.1% 6.4%5 yr average annual growth 4.4% 3.6%10 yr average annual growth 9.9% 9.2%15 yr average annual growth na naAverage time on market (days) 44 57Average vendor discount -4.3% -5.3%Median weekly rental rates 619 486Gross rental yield 6.2% 6.2%Average hold period (years) 6.0 5.5

38


$145,000Based on the median selling price of a home over the three months to June 2013, houses are $145,000 more expensive than units in Canberra.

Canberra home values show nominal change over the past year (See G1)Canberra home values have increased by 1.1 per cent over the 12 months to June 2013. House values have increased by 1.1 per cent over the year and unit values have increased by a greater 1.7 per cent. At the same time a year earlier, Canberra house values had increased by 0.8 per cent over the year and unit values had fallen by 1.7 per cent. Annual growth in Canberra home values consistently outperformed that of the combined capital cities between late 1999 and mid-2004 and since that time capital gains have tracked the growth of the combined capital cities benchmark fairly closely. Over the most recent five years, house values have increased at an average annual rate of 2.7 per cent and units by 2.9 per cent. Over the five years to June 2008, growth in home values was much stronger with house values recording an average annual increase of 6.4 per cent and unit values increasing by 5.8 per cent annually. The future challenge for the Canberra housing market will be the likelihood of public service job cuts following the federal election, which is anticipated to have an impact on the demand for housing.

There has been only a moderate increase in sales activity in Canberra over the past year (See G2)It is estimated that there were 1,309 houses and 910 units sold in Canberra over the three months to May 2013. House sales were 19.5 per cent higher than over the corresponding period a year earlier and unit sales were 8.1 per cent higher. Over the 12 months to May 2013, there were 4,166 houses and 3,322 units sold in Canberra. Annual transaction activity was 1.6 per cent higher than a year ago for houses and 5.2 per cent lower for units. It is clear that although sales activity has increased over the past year in Canberra the uplift has been much more moderate than that recorded across the other capital city housing markets.

A lack of rental pressures prevalent in the Canberra detached housing market (See G3)Canberra houses have a current median rent of $536 per week for houses and $443 per week for units. Over the 12 months to June 2013, house rents have increased by just 0.8 per cent and unit rents have fallen by 2.0 per cent. The figures indicate that there is very little rental pressure currently across the Canberra housing market. The change in rents over the past year is well below the five year average annual levels of 4.0 per cent for houses and 3.7 per cent for units. Gross rental yields have remained unchanged over the past year at 4.6 per cent. Unit rental yields have fallen on the back of the decline in rental rates, shifting to 5.6 per cent from 5.8 per cent a year ago.

Key StatisticsThe average number of days on the market has fallen over the past year. Houses and units are currently taking an average of 48 days to sell. In June 2012, houses took an average of 63 days to sell and units took 72 days.

Of the residential properties sold across the city over the year to June 2013, vendors had owned their houses for an average of 9.3 years and unit owners had held their properties for 7.9 years.

The proportion of homes selling at a loss when compared to their previous purchase price has risen from 3.8 per cent of sales over the three months to May 2012 to 6.2 per cent over the same period in 2013.

Canberra’s estimated residential population at June 2012 was almost 375,000 persons with the population increasing by 1.9 per cent over the past year.

The level of discounting by vendors has increased over the past 12 months. In June 2013, houses were being discounted by an average of 6.2 per cent and units by 5.9 per cent. A year earlier, discount levels were recorded at 5.2 per cent for houses and 5.0 per cent for units.

Canberra

39



Rent

al ra

te ($

)

Gro

ss re

ntal

yie

ld (%

)

550

500

450

400

350

300

250

10.0

9.0

8.0

7.0

6.0

5.0

4.0


G3: Canberra gross rental yields and weekly rents


Jun-

97

Jun-

01

Jun-

99

Jun-

03

Jun-

05

Jun-

07

Jun-

09

Jun-

11

Jun-

13

Mon

thly

sale

s vol

umes

1,500

1,200

900

600

300

0

1,500

1,200

900

600

300

0

Canberra home sales 5 year average

G2: Canberra house and unit sales volumes vs. five year average

Source: RP Data

May

-97

May

-99

May

-01

May

-03

May

-05

May

-07

May

-09

May

-11

May

-13

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

-10%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

-10%


G1: Rolling quarterly and annual change in Canberra home values


Jun-

97

Jun-

99

Jun-

01

Jun-

03

Jun-

05

Jun-

07

Jun-

09

Jun-

11

Jun-

13

Canberra key statistics – June 2013Houses Units


About RP Data

RP Data is wholly owned by CoreLogic, a leading provider of consumer, financial and property information, analytics and services to business and government. CoreLogic has more than 6,000 employees globally and revenues of US$1.6 billion (2012) and is listed on the NYSE.

RP Data is the biggest provider of property information, analytics and risk management services in Australia and New Zealand, with a database of 210 million property records. Our customers range from real estate agents and consumers to banks, mortgage brokers, financial planners and governments.

We understand that data is most useful when it’s presented as relevant and actionable analytics. Our data provides customers with insights that realise more market opportunities, while simultaneously growing businesses and managing risk. We provide Australia’s most trusted pre-listings comparative market appraisal report, as well as industry standard tools that promote transparency and confidence when buying and selling property. In addition, 1 million consumers use RP Data to make important decisions about property they are about to hold, sell or purchase.

Our mortgage platforms cover

more than 90 per cent of the mortgage lending activity in Australia. We estimate the value of every residential property in Australia each week via our automated valuation models which support our industry leading RP Data Rismark Daily Home Value Index. On average, we issue over 30 million automated valuation assessments every month. We’re Australia’s leading source for mobile property information too, with over 500,000 mobile devices accessing our services each month.

We employ 330 people in Australia and New Zealand and our revenue for 2012 was over $70 million.

40

RP Data: ©2013 Copyright RP Data Pty Ltd, Local, State, and Commonwealth Governments. All rights reserved. No reproduction, distribution or transmission of the copyrighted materials in this publication is permitted whether in whole or in part. The copyrighted materials in this publication are provided for personal or internal business purposes only unless otherwise agreed in writing.

The information provided in this publication is current as at the publication date only. This publication is supplied on the basis that while RP Data attempts to ensure the information in it is reliable at the publication date, it does not warrant its accuracy or completeness and to the full extent allowed by law excludes liability in contract, tort or otherwise, for any loss or damage sustained by yourself, or by any other person or body corporate arising from or in connection with the supply or use of the whole or any part of the information in this publication through any cause whatsoever and limits any liability it may have to the amount paid to RP Data for the supply of such information.

This publication provides general information only – it is not intended as advice or a professional property appraisal and should not be relied upon as such. The information provided has not been prepared by taking into account your investment objectives, financial situation or personal needs and may depend on statistical models and assumptions which may be incomplete or wrong, negatively impacting the accuracy of this publication. You should make your own inquiries and if necessary take independent financial advice tailored to your specific circumstances before making any investment decisions.

If you see any inaccuracies in this publication please email us at [email protected].

New South Wales Data: Contains property sales information provided under licence from the Land and Property Information (“LPI”). RP Data is authorised as a Property Sales Information provider by the LPI.

Victorian Data: To the extent that this report has been developed using information owned by the State of Victoria, the State of Victoria owns the copyright in the Property Sales Data which constitutes the basis of this report and reproduction of that data in any way without the consent of the State of Victoria will constitute a breach of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). The State of Victoria does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this report and any person using or relying upon such information does so on the basis that the State of Victoria accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any errors, faults, defects or omissions in the information supplied.

Queensland Data: Based on or contains data provided by the State of Queensland (Department of Environment and Resource Management) 2012. In consideration of the State permitting use of this data you acknowledge and agree that the State gives no warranty in relation to the data (including accuracy, reliability, completeness, currency or suitability) and accepts no liability (including without limitation, liability in negligence) for any loss, damage or costs (including consequential damage) relating to any use of the data. Data must not be used for direct marketing or be used in breach of the privacy laws.

South Australian Data: This information is based on data supplied by the South Australian Government and is published by permission. The South Australian Government does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the published information or suitability for any purpose of the published information or the underlying data.

Australian Capital Territory Data: The Territory Data is the property of the Australian Capital Territory. No part of it may in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, microcopying, photocopying, recording or otherwise) be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior written permission. Enquiries should be directed to: Director, Customer Services ACT Planning and Land Authority GPO Box 1908 Canberra ACT 2601.

Tasmanian Data: This product incorporates data that is copyright owned by the Crown in Right of Tasmania. The data has been used in the product with the permission of the Crown in Right of Tasmania. The Crown in Right of Tasmania and its employees and agents:a) give no warranty regarding the data’s

accuracy, completeness, currency or suitability for any particular purpose; and

b) do not accept liability howsoever arising, including but not limited to negligence for any loss resulting from the use of or reliance upon the data.

Base data from the LIST ©State of Tasmania http://www.thelist.tas.gov.au

Western Australian Data: Based on information provided by and with the permission of the Western Australian Land Information Authority (2012) trading as Landgate.

DisclaimersDisclaimers | RP Data Property Capital Carkets Report, Spring 2013


f Quickly and accurately confirm collateral values f Expose hidden risks within a loan file f Build confidence and reliability with investment decisions

RP Data is the only provider in Australia that offers a comprehensive risk evaluation and property valuation framework allowing you to make prudent, risk adjusted decisions.


Giving you the confidence to make better decisions with superior property and market information


f Gain valuable insights into Australian property dynamics at a macro or micro level f Make better informed decisions with predictive insights and dynamic risk management f Gain the competitive edge with solutions that expose hidden risks or opportunities within

investment alternatives


Providing vital insights and analytics in an ever-changing property market

property capital markets report - amazon s3...reading, australian mortgage holders are continuing to...

Documents