property taxation of affordable housing todd c. brockmannlee j. van de carr jr. the brockmann law...

26
Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. Brockmann Lee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PC The Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate Center Drive 3924 Browning Place Suite 100 Suite 1 Charlotte, NC 28226 Raleigh, NC 27609 (704) 541-5779 (919) 755-0558 [email protected] [email protected]

Upload: victor-anderson

Post on 24-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

Property Taxationof

Affordable Housing

Todd C. Brockmann Lee J. Van De Carr Jr.The Brockmann Law Firm, PC The Pendergraph Companies, LLC8037 Corporate Center Drive 3924 Browning PlaceSuite 100 Suite 1Charlotte, NC 28226 Raleigh, NC 27609(704) 541-5779 (919) 755-0558 [email protected] [email protected]

Page 2: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

What is the Issue?

Income Approachvs.

Income Using Market Rentsvs.

Income + Tax Credit Value Approachvs.

Replacement Cost Approachvs.

Statutory Guidelines

Page 3: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

State Analysis

Results vary from:

• State to State

• County to County in some states

• Variances declining?

Page 4: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

Example of Income Approach

Example Property:

136 units, 8 story high-rise, Senior community

NOI = $267,000, Effective Tax Rate = 1.43%

Income Approach:

NOI = $ 267,000

Cap Rate = 9.00%

Value = $ 2,966,667

Page 5: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

Example of Income Approach using Market Rate Rents

Example Property:

136 units, 8 story high-rise, Senior community

NOI = $267,000, Effective Tax Rate = 1.43%

Income Approach using Market Rate Rents:

NOI = $360,000 * assuming market rents are 10% higher than TC rents

Cap Rate = 9.00%

Value = $4,000,000

Page 6: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

Example of Income Approach adding Tax Credit Value

Example Property:136 units, 8 story high-rise, Senior communityNOI = $267,000, Effective Tax Rate = 1.43%

Income Approach adding Tax Credit Value:NOI = $267,000

Cap Rate = 9.00%Sub-Total = $2,966,667Tax Credits = $3,000,000Value = $5,966,667

Page 7: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

Example of Income Approach using Market Rate Rents and adding Tax Credit Value

Example Property:136 units, 8 story high-rise, Senior communityNOI = $267,000, Effective Tax Rate = 1.43%

Income Approach using Market Rate Rents and adding Tax Credit Value:

NOI = $360,000 Cap Rate = 9.00%

Sub-Total = $4,000,000Tax Credits = $3,000,000Value = $7,000,000

Page 8: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

Example of Replacement Cost Approach

Example Property:136 units, 8 story high-rise, Senior communityNOI = $267,000, Effective Tax Rate = 1.43%

Replacement Cost Approach:

Insured Value = $6,075,000 * Typically a per sq ft value is used to get this calculation

(135,000 sq ft at $45.00 per sq ft)

Dev Budget = $5,300,000 Dev budget minus financing costs, land, soft costs, dev fee

Average = $5,687,500

Page 9: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

Taxes at Different Values using Effective Tax Rate

APPROACH VALUE PROPERTY TAXES

Restricted Income $2,966,667 $42,423

Market Income $4,000,000 $57,200

Restricted Income+ Tax Credits

$5,966,667 $85,323

Market Income + Tax Credits

$7,000,000 $100,100

Replacement Cost $5,687,500 $81,331

Page 10: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

North Carolina Case Law

The Greens of Pine Glen Ltd. v. Durham County Board of Equalization (2003) Supreme Court

“Taxpayer voluntarily entered into such an agreement because of the substantial tax credits it received in return. Taxpayer could have built these apartments for rental on the open market, but it chose to be in the business of affordable housing in order to take advantage of the various federal and state incentives. Its participation in the section 42 program created another way to finance taxpayer’s building project because the sale of the tax credits generated funds that taxpayer used to construct The Greens of Pine Glen. Therefore, taxpayer’s participation in section 42 housing represented a business and economic decision…..”

Page 11: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

Recent Bankruptcy Case

In re: Creekside Senior Apartments, LP, et al

• Five related Kentucky LIHTC projects fell into bankruptcy.

• Bankruptcy Court was tasked with determining the value of each property and added the net present value of the remaining tax credits to the property value at the rent-restricted appraised value.

Page 12: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

Recent Bankruptcy Case

In re: Creekside Senior Apartments, LP, et al

“The issue was whether the fair market value of the various apartment complexes secured by the Bank's mortgages should reflect the value of the remaining tax credits. The Bank did not argue, nor did the bankruptcy court determine, that the Bank was entitled to claim the tax credits on its tax returns. Nor did the Bank argue that it owned or had a separate security interest in the tax credits or in the money paid by the investors in exchange for allocation of the tax credits. The only aspect of the tax credits at issue in this case is whether the value of the remaining credits affects the value of the Bank's collateral and, thus, the amount of the Bank's secured claim.”

“Because the restrictions limit the amount of income an owner can realize from low-income housing properties, the restrictions affect the price a willing seller would agree to pay for such properties….If the burden impacts the value, the benefits must as well…[T]he value of the remaining tax credits is properly included in determining the amount of the Bank's secured claim.”

Page 13: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

North Carolina Statute

N.C.G.S. Section 105-277.16.

A North Carolina low-income housing development to which the North Carolina Housing Finance Agency allocated a federal tax credit under section 42 of the Code is designated a special class of property under Article V, Section 2(2) of the North Carolina Constitution and must be appraised, assessed, and taxed in accordance with this section. The assessor must use the income approach as the method of valuation for property classified under this section and must take rent restrictions that apply to the property into consideration in determining the income attributable to the property. The assessor may not consider income tax credits received under this section 42 of the Code or under G.S. 105-129.42 in determining the income attributable to the property.

Became effective for 2009-2010 fiscal tax year

Page 14: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

Sample under N.C.G.S. Section 105-277.16

Mayberry Apartments, LLCMayberry County, North Carolina

Units 50% 60%1-bedroom 28 345 3752-bedroom 8 418 448Total Units 36

Sources:Tax Credit Equity 2,914,441$ NC State Credit 788,958$ Deferred Dev Fee 31,720$

3,735,119$

Total Revenues 167,028$ Less Vacancy (11,692)$ Less Operating Expenses (exc. Taxes) (98,854)$ Less Replacement Reserves (9,000)$ Projected NOI 47,482$ Audited NOI 46,756$

Page 15: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

Sample under N.C.G.S. Section 105-277.16

Mayberry Apartments, LLCMayberry County, North Carolina

II. County Methodology

Total Revenue 162,528$ Gross Rent Multiplier (based on "sales") 11County Valuation 1,787,808$ Tax Rate 1.2450%Taxes 22,258.21$

Excess Valuation 1,268,297$ 1,203,358$ 1,119,865$ Tax Rate 1.2450% 1.2450% 1.2450%Excess Taxes 15,790$ 14,982$ 13,942$

Page 16: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

How Do you Calculate Costs?

• Actual costs are most accurate for the project, but county wants uniformity.

• County will apply a percentage of income (e.g. 40%) as a flat cost amount.

• Normal multifamily percentage underestimates costs because of lower affordable rents.

• Are reserves considered expenses?

Page 17: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

Other Issues Under Statute

• Value is based upon revaluation year

• 1602/Exchange projects

• Which rent restrictions – actual or maximum

• Capitalization rate used

• Weighing the cost of the appeal – attorney, appraiser, time

Page 18: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

North Carolina Exemptions

• Property Tax Exemption in certain circumstances

• N.C.G.S. § 105-278.6 (a)(8): Exempt if wholly-owned by nonprofit organizations providing housing for individuals or families with low or moderate incomes.

• What about for-profit affordable housing without tax credits?

 

Page 19: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

South Carolina Statutes

• Anecdotal evidence indicates that it was negotiable in various counties prior to 2006

• SC Code of Laws § 12-37-225: Income approach required“(A) Federal or state income tax credits for low income

housing may not be taken into consideration with respect to the valuation of real property or in determining the fair market value of real property for property tax purposes. For properties that have deed restrictions in effect that promote or provide for low income housing, the income approach must be the method of valuation to be used.

(B) For purposes of this section, ‘low income housing’ means housing intended for occupancy by households with incomes not exceeding eighty percent of area median income, adjusted for household size, as determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.”

• SC Code of Laws § 12-37-220: Nonprofit exemption from property taxes

Page 20: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

North Carolina Property Tax Appeal Process

STEP ONE: INFORMAL APPEAL

• File appeal form• Tax department appraiser will review• The result is mailed to owner• The owner has thirty (30) days to file a formal appeal

Page 21: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

North Carolina Property Tax Appeal Process

STEP TWO: FORMAL APPEAL

• File formal appeal form• Tax department appraiser meets with owner to

discuss findings and give opinion. If still disputed, a formal appeal case will be scheduled and presented to the Board of Equalization and Review.

• At hearing, owner and tax department present information to Board.

• Board makes decision which is mailed to owner within thirty (30) days of hearing.

Page 22: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

North Carolina Property Tax Appeal Process

STEP THREE: PROPERTY TAX COMMISSION

The owner has thirty (30) days from the date on the formal appeal decision to file an appeal with the North Carolina Property Tax Commission.

Appeal cases are adjudicated in Raleigh.

Page 23: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

North Carolina Property Tax Appeal Process

STEP FOUR: COURTS

The owner may make an appeal to the North Carolina Court of Appeals and North Carolina Supreme Court.

See Greens of Pine Glen case.

Page 24: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

Important Dates for Real Estate Tax Appeals in North Carolina

APPEALS AT COUNTY LEVEL(Board of Commissioners or Board of Equalization and Review)

NCGS 105-322 (g)(2): On request, the board of equalization and review shall hear any taxpayer who owns or controls property taxable in the county with respect to the listing or appraisal of the taxpayer’s property or the property of others.

a. A request for a hearing under this subdivision (g)(2) shall be made in writing to or by personal appearance before the board

prior to its adjournment.

NCGS 105-322(e): Time of Meeting. – Each year the board of equalization and review shall hold its first meeting not earlier than the first Monday in April and not later than the first Monday in May.

NCGS 105-322(g)(2)(d): ...The board shall notify the appellant by mail as to the action taken on the taxpayer’s appeal not later than 30 days after the board’s adjournment.

Page 25: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

Important Dates for Real Estate Tax Appeals in North Carolina

APPEALS AT STATE LEVEL(Property Tax Commission and ultimately the North Carolina Court of Appeals)

NCGS 105-290(e): Time Limits for appeals. – A notice of appeal from an order of a board of county commissioners, other than an order adopting a uniform schedule of values, or from a board of equalization and review shall be filed with the Property Tax Commission within 30 days after the date the board mailed a notice of its decision to the property owner.

NCGS 105-345(a): No party to a proceeding before the Property Tax Commission may appeal from any final order or decision of the Commission unless within 30 days after the entry of such final order or decision the party aggrieved by such decision or order shall file with the Commission notice of appeal and exceptions which shall set forth specifically the ground or grounds on which the aggrieved party considers said decision or order to be unlawful, unjust, unreasonable or unwarranted, and including errors alleged to have been committed by the Commission.

Page 26: Property Taxation of Affordable Housing Todd C. BrockmannLee J. Van De Carr Jr. The Brockmann Law Firm, PCThe Pendergraph Companies, LLC 8037 Corporate

Property Taxationof

Affordable Housing

Todd C. Brockmann Lee J. Van De Carr Jr.The Brockmann Law Firm, PC The Pendergraph Companies, LLC8037 Corporate Center Drive 3924 Browning PlaceSuite 100 Suite 1Charlotte, NC 28226 Raleigh, NC 27609(704) 541-5779 (919) 755-0558 [email protected] [email protected]